Exoscope as a Teaching Tool: A Narrative Review of the Literature

Exoscope-assisted orbital fracture reduction surgery-Clinical assessment by surgeons: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Exoscope-assisted digital imaging allows continuous real-time visualization of the surgical site on a large 3D monitor. We evaluated its usefulness in orbital fracture reduction surgery, a procedure with a narrow and deep operative field that restricts direct visibility for the operating surgeon.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent orbital floor fracture reduction with an absorbable plate via a subciliary approach at our institution from January 2022 to December 2024. ORBEYE 3D exoscope system (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was used in all cases when available, as the device was shared among several departments in our institution. Surgeries performed with and without the ORBEYE exoscope were compared for the following preoperative variables: (i) years since the surgeon's graduation and (ii) days from injury to surgery, and outcome variables including (iii) operative time, (iv) blood loss, and (v) absorbable plate size. Surgeons also completed a questionnaire regarding their experience with ORBEYE.

RESULTS

Eleven patients underwent conventional surgery, and 10 underwent ORBEYE-assisted surgery. ORBEYE-assisted surgery resulted in a significantly shorter operative time, while no significant differences were observed in other preoperative or outcome variables. The involved surgeons reported reduced physical strain, particularly in the neck, as well as improved collaboration and education. Despite some disadvantages, all surgeons expressed a positive attitude toward continued ORBEYE use.

CONCLUSIONS

ORBEYE-assisted surgery offers significant advantages in orbital floor fracture reduction, including reduced operative time, improved ergonomics, and enhanced teamwork and education. Its drawbacks are relatively minor, and broader adoption in plastic surgery should be considered.

Implementation of ORBEYE®-Exoscope in the Operative Treatment of Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistula

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (sDAVFs) are rather uncommon lesions of the spine. In sDAVFs, which represent the most frequent form of vascular malformations of the spine, operative treatment remains the most common treatment modality. In operative surgery, visualization and pathology detection have a key impact on the results of the neurosurgical treatment of an sDAVF. The exoscope is one of the most recent imaging devices developed alongside the microscope and endoscope. The exoscope is being increasingly applied in neurosurgical procedures as an alternative to operative microscopes due to various advantages, such as its non-space-occupying camera, excellent visualization of the anatomical details and the perfect teaching possibilities it thus provides. In this publication, we present our experience in the treatment of a patient with an sDAVF, where surgery was performed exclusively with an ORBEYE-exoscope for the entire duration of the procedure. This report outlines the workflow and some of the technical pitfalls involved in managing this vascular pathology using the exoscopic technique.

Neurosurgical applications of the exoscope: from in vitro studies to real-life surgical use in selective dorsal rhizotomy

BACKGROUND

The microscope has been the gold standard in neurosurgical practice due to its ability to magnify anatomical structures. However, it has limitations, including restricted visual fields and ergonomic challenges that can lead to surgeon fatigue and musculoskeletal issues. The exoscope is an emerging technology that may address these limitations by offering comparable magnification with improved ergonomics.

METHODS

This study compares the traditional microscope (KINEVO 900) with a 3D digital exoscope (Aeos Digital Microscope) in visual field width, image sharpness, and ergonomic impact. Visual field assessments were conducted using millimeter paper at a fixed distance, while image sharpness was evaluated using graph paper with pins at different depths. Ergonomic evaluation involved simulating surgical positions using a spine anatomical model. The practical applicability was tested during Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy (SDR) procedures, comparing the surgeon's experience with both devices over 20 consecutive cases.

RESULTS

The exoscope provided a larger visual field (81.18 cm2) compared to the microscope's (54.10 cm2). Image sharpness was similar for both devices across various depths and zoom levels. Ergonomically, the exoscope allowed the surgeon to maintain a neutral posture while visualizing extreme angles, unlike the microscope, which required significant upper body movement. In SDR procedures, the exoscope improved surgeon comfort and interaction with the operating team, despite an initial learning curve.

CONCLUSIONS

The exoscope presents notable advantages in terms of visual field and ergonomics. The exoscope's ability to facilitate better posture and team communication without compromising image quality makes it an addition to neurosurgical practice, as in SDR.

3D 4K Exo-Endoscopic Temporal Bone Dissection: A Novel Approach for Sharing the Anatomy

BACKGROUND

Temporal bone dissection is overwide recognized as an ideal training method for otologic surgeons. The knowledge of temporal bone anatomy and especially of the course of infratemporal facial nerve is pivotal in practice. The 3D exoscope is an innovative and promising tool, that was recently introduced in ear surgery.

METHODS

A high-definition 3D exoscope (3D VITOM®) mounted on the VERSACRANETM holding system (Karl Storz) was used to perform two temporal bone dissection, with the aim to study the anatomy of infratemporal facial nerve. The 3D endoscope (TIPCAM®1 S 3D ORL, Karl Storz) was used in combination to provide a close-up high-quality view and to provide a different angle of view on fine anatomical relationships.

RESULTS

The high-definition 3D exoscope allowed to conduct the dissection with high quality visualization and to share the same surgical field with trainees. Moreover, it showed a high interchangeability with the 3D endoscope.

CONCLUSIONS

3D 4 K Exo-endoscopic temporal bone dissection seems to have benefits in terms of educational purpose, especially concerning anatomy understanding. The superiority in teaching value of this tool should be further investigated in cohort studies.

Assessment of head-mounted display for exoscopic neurosurgery

Background

Head-mounted display (HMD) arises as an alternative display system for surgery. This study aimed to assess the utility of a stereoscopic HMD for exoscopic neurosurgery.

Methods

The leading operator and assistants were asked to assess the various aspects of the HMD characteristics compared to the monitor display using a visual analog scale (VAS)-based questionnaire. The VAS score ranged from 0 to 10 (0, HMD was significantly inferior to the monitor; 5, HMD and monitor display were equal; and 10, HMD was significantly superior to the monitor).

Results

The surgeons and assistants used and evaluated HMD in seven exoscopic surgeries: three tumor removal, one aneurysm clipping, one anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, and two cervical laminectomy surgeries. The leading operators' assessment of HMD-based surgery was not different from monitor-based surgery; however, the assistants evaluated the field of view, overall image quality, and the assisting procedure as better in MHD-based surgery than monitor-based surgery (P = 0.039, 0.045, and 0.013, respectively).

Conclusion

HMD-based exoscopic neurosurgery can be performed at a similar quality as monitor-based surgery. Surgical assistants may benefit from using HMD-based surgery.

Ergonomics of Various Modalities for Ear Surgery

Objective

Evaluate ergonomic differences of various modalities for performing middle ear surgery.

Study Design

Observational study.

Setting

Two academic tertiary care centers.

Methods

Attending physicians and residents performing middle ear surgery were photographed intraoperatively. Intraoperative photographs were analyzed using the validated Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) tool to measure musculoskeletal disease (MSD) risk. Descriptive statistics and significance testing were used to characterize and compare ergonomic differences between surgical modalities. Multivariable ordinal regression was performed to assess factors associated with increased MSD risk, as determined by the final RULA score.

Results

Most of our 110 intraoperative photos featured attendings (82.7%) performing combined middle ear surgery and mastoidectomy (60.0%). Body angles and the final RULA score varied significantly among modalities. On subset analysis, microscopic surgery exhibited significantly worse wrist, trunk, and neck angles compared to endoscopic and exoscopic surgery. Exoscopic surgery had significantly lower final RULA scores than both endoscopic and microscopic surgery, indicating significantly lower MSD risk. Microscopic and endoscopic surgery final scores did not vary significantly. In a multivariable ordinal regression of factors associated with increased RULA score, exoscopic surgery had statistically significantly less ergonomic risk relative to microscopic surgery (odds ratio = 0.12, 95% confidence interval = [0.03-0.43]).

Conclusion

Exoscopic, endoscopic, and microscopic surgery all featured low ergonomic risk, although exoscopic middle ear surgery demonstrated the lowest risk profile among studied surgical modalities. This demonstrates the importance of using each modality in combination with other ergonomic interventions to provide meaningful musculoskeletal benefits.

Exoscope Use in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of Applications, Benefits, and Limitations

BACKGROUND

Exoscopes were recently developed as an alternative to the operative microscope (OM) and endoscope for intraoperative visualization during neurosurgery. Prior reviews studying mixed cranial and spinal surgical cohorts reported advantages with exoscope use, including improved ergonomics and teaching. In recent years, there has been an increase in exoscope research, with no updated systematic review focused exclusively on the benefits and limitations of exoscope use in spine surgery. Thus, we sought to systematically synthesize the literature related to exoscope-assisted spine surgery.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies reported between 2010 and September 2023. Data, such as the exoscope model used, procedure types performed, and user observations, were then collected.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies met our inclusion criteria, including 481 patients with spine pathologies who underwent a surgical procedure using 1 of 9 exoscope models. The lumbar region was the most frequently operated area (n = 234; 48.6%), and discectomies comprised the most overall procedures (n = 273; 56.8%). All patients benefited clinically. The reported advantages of exoscopes compared with OMs or endoscopes were improved focal distance, surgeon posture, trainee education, compactness, and assistant participation. Other aspects such as stereopsis, illumination, and cost had various observations.

CONCLUSIONS

Exoscopes have advantages compared with OMs or endoscopes during spine surgery. The user learning curve is minimal, and no negative patient outcomes have been reported. However, some aspects of exoscope use necessitate longer term prospective research before exoscopes can be considered a standard tool in the armamentarium of intraoperative visualization strategies.

Exoscopic microneurosurgery in pediatric brain tumors: an ideal tool for complex and peculiar anatomo-topographic scenarios?

PURPOSE

Since its introduction in the 1950s, the microsurgical paradigm has revolutionized neurosurgery. New technologies have been introduced over the years trying to overcome limits of the classical operating microscope. The recently developed 3D exoscopes represent a potential new paradigm for micro-neurosurgery. We analyzed our own experience with a 4 K-3D exoscope in a series of pediatric brain tumors to verify its advantages and limitations in comparison to the operating microscope and in light of the literature.

METHODS

Twenty-five pediatric patients with brain tumors underwent surgery at our Institute; the population has been analyzed and described. A score to evaluate the exoscopes and compare it to the operating microscope was considered and postoperatively applied to each single case.

RESULTS

The exoscope appears to be at least comparable to the operating microscope (OM) in all analyzed aspects. In the case of deep-seated or fourth ventricle tumors, the exoscope seems to be superior to the microscope. A surgeon-dependent learning curve is necessary for neurosurgeons to be confident with the exoscope.

CONCLUSION

Exoscopes appear to be as safe and effective as operating microscopes in pediatric neuro-oncological surgery. They have some advantages that make them superior to microscopes, particularly regarding surgeon ergonomics and fatigue, visual field qualities, and higher choice of intraoperative viewing angles.

The New Era of Spinal Surgery: Exploring the Use of Exoscopes as a Viable Alternative to Operative Microscopes-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The growing interest in exoscopic (EX) technology has prompted a comprehensive evaluation of its clinical, functional, and financial outcomes in neurosurgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the utilization of EX in spine surgery and assess their safety, efficacy, and impact on surgical outcomes.

METHODS

A thorough literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The study focused on articles concerning the application of EXs in spinal surgical procedures. The inclusion criteria encompassed various study designs presenting clinical data and intraoperative experiences related to EX utilization in spine surgery.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included studies examining various aspects of EX utilization, such as intraoperative complications, video/image quality, surgical field visualization, ease of manipulation, ergonomic characteristics, educational utility, surgical duration, and team involvement. Findings indicated that EXs offered superior video quality and favorable ergonomic features. Comparable outcomes were observed in surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, time to discharge, and postoperative pain levels between EX and conventional microscope approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides valuable insights into the utilization of EXs in spine surgery, demonstrating their potential advantages and comparable outcomes with conventional microscopes.

From Microscopic to Exoscopic Microsurgery: Are We Facing a Change of Paradigm?

BACKGROUND

Neurosurgery is a medical branch characterized by small and deep surgical field with the need of manipulation and dissection of anatomical structures. High light and magnification are required in order to avoid injuries to important anatomical structures and to avoid permanent neurological deficits. Introduction of operative microscope made a change of paradigm in neurosurgery allowing to better see what could not be seen with common light. Nowadays, introduction of several technologies have increased the safety and efficacy of neurosurgery. Among new technologies, the 3D exoscope is emerging pretending to shift the paradigm of microneurosurgery. In this work, we aim to show our first experience with the use of the exoscope showing advantages and disadvantages.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed our surgical database from the introduction of the exoscope in our department (in November 2020 temporarily; then from November 2021 definitively) searching for all the microsurgery interventions performed in the period.

RESULTS

From the introduction of the exoscope in our department, we operated 244 cases with the OM and 228 with the exoscope. We operated 175 lesions located in the supratentorial compartment, 29 in the infratentorial, and 24 in the spinal column. Regarding the OM, the ratios were as follows: 122 females and 122 males; 235 adults and 9 children; 66 supratentorial lesions, 14 infratentorial lesions, and 164 spine surgeries. Our team showed a progressive switch from the microscope to the exoscope. Only one member of our team preferred to continue to use the standard operative microscope.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience showed no complications related to the use of the exoscope that proved to be safe and effective both for surgery and teaching.

Functionality and Usability of the Exoscope in Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm and Trigeminal Neuralgia

BACKGROUND

Studies on the functionality and usability of the exoscope in neurosurgical procedures against surgical microscopes (SMs) are limited. This study aimed to examine the functionality and usability of the exoscope during microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery.

METHODS

Seven neurosurgeons evaluated the usefulness of a 4 K, 3-dimension digital exoscope in MVD by answering a questionnaire. The questionnaire inquired about the functionality and usability of the exoscope by utilizing a visual analog scale (VAS; 1-10). A score of 5 on VAS was equivalent to the corresponding quality of the SM. The learning effect of the exoscope was evaluated using mean VAS scores in the first and last 3 cases for each neurosurgeon.

RESULTS

The functionality of the exoscope in MVD was superior to that in SM (P < 0.001). In the last 3 surgeries, the mean VAS scores of the exoscope were excellent in terms of ease of arm handling, exchange of surgical instruments, ease of surgical procedure, and intraoperative physical stress. The mean VAS scores of the exoscope in intraoperative asthenopia were significantly higher than those of the SM (P < 0.001). No statistical significance was found in operation time, discharge outcome, and 1-year post-surgery outcome between MVD performed using the exoscope and SM.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurosurgeons may experience reduced stress levels during MVD when using the exoscope. As the outcome of MVD using the exoscope did not demonstrate a statistical difference compared with MVD using the SM, the exoscope may prove to be a useful tool for performing MVD.

The Feasibility of the Three-Dimensional Footswitch-Operated Robotic Arm Exoscope for Cochlear Implant Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To compare the three-dimensional (3D) footswitch-operated robotic arm exoscope with the operating microscope (OM) in cochlear implant surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Matched case-control study.

PATIENTS

Cochlear implantation was performed with the exoscope on unselected patients with normal temporal anatomy. The control group that underwent cochlear implantation with the OM was case matched with respect to age, anatomy, surgical technique, and type of anesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

Cochlear implantation performed with the 3D exoscope.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Surgical time, occupation of the operation theater, surgical results, and user experience evaluated by a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (13 ears) were successfully operated on with the exoscope. In the exoscope group, we observed one minor intraoperative complication, where the middle dura was exposed during mastoidectomy. Although no clear preference was evident for either device in the overall rating, the subdomain rating revealed that the exoscope's image quality was deemed inferior, especially at higher magnifications where pixelation became noticeable. The exoscope received higher scores for usability, particularly excelling in terms of surgeon's ergonomic and comfortability. There was a statistically significant difference in mean surgical time, 146 and 129 min for the exoscope and OM group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cochlear implant surgery was found to be feasible with a 3D exoscope. However, there is a learning curve to overcome regarding handling and the different quality of the image. The exoscope provides better ergonomics for the surgeon.

Accessible Spinal Surgery: Transformation Through the Implementation of Exoscopes As Substitutes for Conventional Microsurgery in Low- and Middle-Income Settings

Advancements in neurosurgical visualization have been made possible by the introduction of the operating microscope (OM) and the emergence of exoscopic technology (EX). Both OMs and EXs provide enhanced magnification and illumination, but they come with their own set of advantages and disadvantages. OMs provide high-quality magnification and illumination and have been used successfully in a variety of surgical procedures. They can be customized to fit the specific needs of the surgeon and are a well-established technology. However, they can be bulky, expensive, and cause discomfort during extended procedures. EXs provide high-definition magnification and illumination, improved depth perception and ergonomics, and can be cost-effective. They can be customized to fit the specific needs of the surgeon and can be made using locally available materials, reducing the need for expensive imports. However, they may require adjustment and have a learning curve for surgeons who are used to operating with OMs. Additionally, they may have limited availability in some healthcare settings. The choice between OMs and EXs will depend on the specific needs of the surgeon and the healthcare setting. The integration of 3D EX systems has revolutionized neurosurgery, offering improved depth perception and ergonomics. EX's cost-effectiveness addresses accessibility concerns, making it an attractive alternative, particularly for low and middle-income healthcare settings. The exoscope seems to be a safe alternative compared to an operative microscope for the most common brain and spinal procedures. The exoscope may help expand access to neurosurgical care and training worldwide. In conclusion, both technologies have their own set of advantages and disadvantages, and the choice between them will depend on the specific needs of the surgeon and the healthcare setting.

Taming the exoscope: a one-year prospective laboratory training study

PURPOSE

Digital 3D exoscopes have been recently introduced as an alternative to a surgical microscope in microneurosurgery. We designed a laboratory training program to facilitate and measure the transition from microscope to exoscope. Our aim was to observe the effect of a one-year active training on microsurgical skills with the exoscope by repeating a standardized test task at several time points during the training program.

METHODS

Two board-certified neurosurgeons with no previous exoscope experience performed the same test tasks in February, July, and November during a 12-month period. In between the test tasks, both participants worked with the exoscope in the laboratory and assisted during clinical surgeries on daily basis. Each of the test segments consisted of repeating the same task 10 times during one week. Altogether, 60 test tasks were performed, 30 each. The test task consisted of dissecting and harvesting the ulnar and radial arteries of the second segment of a chicken wing using an exoscope (Aesculap AEOS). Each dissection was recorded on video and analyzed by two independent evaluators. We measured the time required to complete the task as well as several metrics for evaluating the manual skills of the dissection and handling of the exoscope system.

RESULT

There was a clear reduction in dissection time between the first and the last session, mean 34 min (SD 5.96) vs. 26 min (SD 8.69), respectively. At the end of the training, both neurosurgeons used the exoscope more efficiently utilizing more available options of the device. There was correlation between the dissection time and several of the factors we used for evaluating the work flow: staying in focus, zoom control, reduction of unnecessary movements or repetitive manual motions, manipulation technique of the vessel under dissection, handling of the instruments, and using them for multiple dissection purposes (stretching, cutting, and splitting).

CONCLUSION

Continuous, dedicated long-term training program is effective for microsurgical skill development when switching from a microscope to an exoscope. With practice, the micromotor movements become more efficient and the use of microinstruments more versatile.

Exoscopic Microsurgery: A Change of Paradigm in Brain Tumor Surgery? Comparison with Standard Operative Microscope

BACKGROUND

The exoscope is a high-definition telescope recently introduced in neurosurgery. In the past few years, several reports have described the advantages and disadvantages of such technology. No studies have compared results of surgery with standard microscope and exoscope in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

METHODS

Our retrospective study encompassed 177 patients operated on for GBM (WHO 2021) between February 2017 and August 2022. A total of 144 patients were operated on with a microscope only and the others with a 3D4K exoscope only. All clinical and radiological data were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have been estimated in the two groups and compared by the Cox model adjusting for potential confounders (e.g., sex, age, Karnofsky performance status, gross total resection, MGMT methylated promoter, and operator's experience).

RESULTS

IDH was mutated in 9 (5.2%) patients and MGMT was methylated in 76 (44.4%). Overall, 122 patients received a gross total resection, 14 patients received a subtotal resection, and 41 patients received a partial resection. During follow-up, 139 (73.5%) patients experienced tumor recurrence and 18.7% of them received a second surgery. After truncation to 12 months, the median PFS for patients operated on with the microscope was 8.82 months, while for patients operated on with the exoscope it was >12 months. Instead, the OS was comparable in the two groups. The multivariable Cox model showed that the use of microscope compared to the exoscope was associated with lower progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 3.55, 95%CI = 1.66-7.56, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The exoscope has proven efficacy in terms of surgical resection, which was not different to that of the microscope. Furthermore, patients operated on with the exoscope had a longer PFS. A comparable OS was observed between microscope and exoscope, but further prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed.

Neurovascular Microsurgical Experience Through 3-Dimensional Exoscopy: Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

The microscope is important in neurosurgery, but it is not exempt from limitations. The exoscope has emerged as an alternative because it offers better 3-dimensional (3D) visualization and better ergonomics. We present our initial experience in vascular pathology using 3D exoscopy at the Dos de Mayo National Hospital to show the viability of the 3D exoscope in vascular microsurgery. We also provide a review of the literature.

METHODS

In this work, the Kinevo 900 exoscope was used in 3 patients with cerebral (2) and spinal (1) vascular pathology. We evaluated the image quality, equipment management, ergonomics, educational utility, and 3D glasses and recorded the characteristics of the cases. We reviewed the experience of other authors as well.

RESULTS

Three patients underwent surgery: 1 occipital cavernoma, 1 cerebral dural fistula, and 1 spinal dural fistula. Excellent 3D visualization with Zeiss Kinevo 900 exoscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany), surgical comfort, and educational utility occurred, and there were no complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience and that of other authors suggests that the 3D exoscope shows excellent visualization, better ergonomics, and an innovative educational experience. Vascular microsurgery can be performed safely and effectively.

Exoscope and operative microscope for training in microneurosurgery: A laboratory investigation on a model of cranial approach

Objective

To evaluate the viability of exoscopes in the context of neurosurgical education and compare the use of a 4k3D exoscope to a traditional operative microscope in the execution of a task of anatomic structure identification on a model of cranial approach.

Material and methods

A cohort of volunteer residents performed a task of anatomical structure identification with both devices three times across an experimental period of 2 months. We timed the residents’ performances, and the times achieved were analyzed. The volunteers answered two questionnaires concerning their opinions of the two devices.

Results

Across tries, execution speed improved for the whole cohort. When using the exoscopes, residents were quicker to identify a single anatomical structure starting from outside the surgical field when deep structures were included in the pool. In all other settings, the two devices did not differ in a statistically significant manner. The volunteers described the exoscope as superior to the microscope in all the aspects the questionnaires inquired about, besides the depth of field perception, which was felt to be better with the microscope. Volunteers furthermore showed overwhelming support for training on different devices and with models of surgical approaches.

Conclusion

The exoscope appeared to be non-inferior to the microscope in the execution of a task of timed identification of anatomical structures on a model of cranial approach carried out by our cohort of residents. In the questionnaires, the residents reported the exoscope to be superior to the microscope in eight of nine investigated domains. Further studies are needed to investigate the use of the exoscope in learning of microsurgical skills.

3D Exoscopes in Experimental Microanastomosis: A Comparison of Different Systems

Background: In recent years, three-dimensional exoscopes have been increasingly applied in neurosurgery. Multiple exoscopic systems are available, all offering specific features. In this study, we assessed practical and visualization performance of four different exoscopic systems in a highly challenging microsurgical procedure, and evaluated whether these affected the quality of work. Methods: We included four different exoscopes: Olympus ORBEYE, Zeiss KINEVO, Storz VITOM, and Aesculap AEOS. With each exoscope, ten experimental bypass procedures were carried out on chicken wing vessels at a depth of 3 cm. We evaluated the quality of the anastomoses, the practical considerations for the setup of the exoscopic systems, and the visualization quality by tracking the number of unnecessary movements. Results: All included exoscopes enabled us to perform the bypass procedures with mostly adequate or excellent results. Surgically, the most pronounced difference between the exoscopes was the duration of the procedure, which was mainly due to the number of unnecessary movements. Practically, the exoscopes differ highly which is important when considering which exoscope to apply. Conclusions: This is the first study comparing different exoscope systems while performing the same challenging microsurgical procedure. We found major practical differences between the exoscopes that determine the suitability of an exoscope based on the demands and conditions of the surgical procedure. Therefore, preprocedural practical training with the exoscope is required.

Comparative survey study of the use of a low cost exoscope vs. microscope for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)

Background

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an often performed procedure in spine neurosurgery. These are often performed using an operating microscope (OM) for better illumination and visualization. But its use is limited to the surgeon and the assistant. There is difficulty in maneuvering long surgical instruments due to the limited space available. Exoscope (EX) has been used as an alternative to microscopes and endoscopes. We used an EX in patients undergoing ACDF for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Methods

A prospective comparative trial was conducted to test the safety and usability of a low-cost EX compared to a conventional surgical binocular OM in ACDF. Twenty-six patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy symptoms were operated by ACDF assisted by the EX and OM between December 2021 and June 2022. The authors collected and compared data on operative time, intraoperative hemorrhage, hospital admission, and complications in the two groups.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in mean operative time, hospital stay, or postoperative complications. The average intraoperative blood loss was significantly more in the OM group. There were no surgical complications related to the use of the EX or OM. The comfort level, preoperative setup and intraoperative adjustment of position and angle of the EX were rated higher than the OM group. The image quality, depth perception, and illumination were rated as inferior to that of the OM. The low-cost EX was rated to be superior to that of the OM with regard to education and training purposes.

Conclusion

Our study showed that the low-cost EX appears to be a safe and effective alternative for OM-assisted ACDF with great comfort and ergonomics and serves as an essential tool for education and training purposes. However, some limitations of our EX included slightly inferior image quality and illumination when compared with the OM.

Visualization, navigation, augmentation. The ever-changing perspective of the neurosurgeon

Introduction

The evolution of neurosurgery coincides with the evolution of visualization and navigation. Augmented reality technologies, with their ability to bring digital information into the real environment, have the potential to provide a new, revolutionary perspective to the neurosurgeon.

Research question

To provide an overview on the historical and technical aspects of visualization and navigation in neurosurgery, and to provide a systematic review on augmented reality (AR) applications in neurosurgery.

Material and methods

We provided an overview on the main historical milestones and technical features of visualization and navigation tools in neurosurgery. We systematically searched PubMed and Scopus databases for AR applications in neurosurgery and specifically discussed their relationship with current visualization and navigation systems, as well as main limitations.

Results

The evolution of visualization in neurosurgery is embodied by four magnification systems: surgical loupes, endoscope, surgical microscope and more recently the exoscope, each presenting independent features in terms of magnification capabilities, eye-hand coordination and the possibility to implement additional functions. In regard to navigation, two independent systems have been developed: the frame-based and the frame-less systems. The most frequent application setting for AR is brain surgery (71.6%), specifically neuro-oncology (36.2%) and microscope-based (29.2%), even though in the majority of cases AR applications presented their own visualization supports (66%).

Discussion and conclusions

The evolution of visualization and navigation in neurosurgery allowed for the development of more precise instruments; the development and clinical validation of AR applications, have the potential to be the next breakthrough, making surgeries safer, as well as improving surgical experience and reducing costs.