Threshold of Toxicological Concern—An Update for Non-Genotoxic Carcinogens

Glucosinolate Hydrolytic Products-A Multi-Arm Warrior

BACKGROUND

Glucosinolates (GSLs) are the most controversial yet ignored class of phytochemicals. These are the middleman phytochemicals that have low bioactivity. But once there is any injury in the plant-manmade, insect caused, or natural-magic happens. The compound is broken down into smaller phytochemicals referred to as glucosinolate hydrolytic products (GHPs; nitriles, isothiocyanates [ITCs], and thiocyanates). These hydrolytic products are like a showstopper of the fashion industry. These compounds have some of the highest bioactivity in nature. They have been associated with a varied range of bioactivities (anticancer, antioxidant, insecticidal, weedicide, etc.) by researchers across the globe.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the current article is to provide a critical review to highlight some of the important bioactivities of these ignored compounds and for promoting researchers to at least give these compounds a chance-to glow in the dark.

METHODS

This review has been written from analysis of accessible literature, mostly from the last 5 years (2018-2023), with some critically essential exceptions.

RESULTS

The review highlighted a brief background of GSLs and its hydrolysis. Efforts were made to include most of the biological properties of the compound. Special emphasis has been given to the anticancer activities of the compound with details of the involved mechanism.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the wide array of bioactivities of GHPs, it is essential to consider it as a prospective medicinal compound. More GHPs-in a similar manner as sulforaphane-can be proceeded to phase trials.

HIGHLIGHTS

The mechanistic pathway for production of GHPs and related biological activities have been discussed in detail. The bioactivities have been further explained using the involved mechanism.

Exploring novel insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying Bisphenol A-induced toxicity: A persistent threat to human health

Bisphenol A (BPA) is a ubiquitous industrial chemical used in the production of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins, found in numerous consumer products. Despite its widespread use, its potential adverse health effects have raised significant concerns. This review explores the molecular mechanisms and evidence-based literature underlying BPA-induced toxicities and its implications for human health. BPA is an endocrine-disrupting chemical (EDC) which exhibits carcinogenic properties by influencing various receptors, such as ER, AhR, PPARs, LXRs, and RARs. It induces oxidative stress and contributes to cellular dysfunction, inflammation, and DNA damage, ultimately leading to various toxicities including but not limited to reproductive, cardiotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and endocrine toxicity. Moreover, BPA can modify DNA methylation patterns, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA expression, leading to epigenetic changes and contribute to carcinogenesis. Overall, understanding molecular mechanisms of BPA-induced toxicity is crucial for developing effective strategies and policies to mitigate its adverse effects on human health.

Computational framework for identifying and evaluating mutagenic and xenoestrogenic potential of food additives

Food additives are chemicals incorporated in food to enhance its flavor, color and prevent spoilage. Some of these are associated with substantial health hazards, including developmental disorders, increase cancer risk, and hormone disruption. Hence, this study aimed to comprehend the in-silico toxicology framework for evaluating mutagenic and xenoestrogenic potential of food additives and their association with breast cancer. A total of 2885 food additives were screened for toxicity based on Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC), mutagenicity endpoint prediction, and mutagenic structural alerts/toxicophores identification. Ten food additives were identified as having mutagenic potential based on toxicity screening. Furthermore, Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) analysis identified ESR1, as a key hub gene in breast cancer. KEGG pathway analysis verified that ESR1 plays a significant role in breast cancer pathogenesis. Additionally, competitive interaction studies of the predicted potential mutagenic food additives with the estrogen receptor-α were evaluated at agonist and antagonist binding sites. Indole, Dichloromethane, Trichloroethylene, Quinoline, 6-methyl quinoline, Ethyl nitrite, and 4-methyl quinoline could act as agonists, and Paraldehyde, Azodicarbonamide, and 2-acetylfuranmay as antagonists. The systematic risk assessment framework reported in this study enables the exploration of mutagenic and xenoestrogenic potential associated with food additives for hazard identification and management.

Occurrence and prioritization of non-volatile substances in recycled PET flakes produced in China

Recycled PET (rPET) is gaining popularity for use in the production of new food contact materials (FCMs) under the context of circular economy. However, the limited information on contaminants in rPET from China and concerns about their potential risk are major obstacles to their use in FCM in China. Fifty-five non-volatile compounds were tentatively identified in 126 batches of hot-washed rPET flakes aimed for food packaging applications in China. Although the 55 substances are not necessarily migratable and may not end up in the contacting media, their presence indicates a need for proper management and control across the value chain. For this reason, the 55 substances prioritized on the basis of level of concerns and in-silico genotoxicity profiler. Among them, dimethoxyethyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate, bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate were classified as level V substances, and Michler's ketone and 4-nitrophenol were both categorized as level V substances and had the genotoxic structure alert, while 2,4,5-trimethylaniline was specified with genotoxic structure alert. The above substances have high priority and may pose a potential risk to human health, therefore special attention should be paid to their migration from rPET. Aside from providing valuable information on non-volatile contaminants present in hot-washed rPET flakes coming from China, this article proposed a prioritization workflow that can be of great help to identify priority substances deserving special attention across the value chain.

Update of the Cancer Potency Database (CPDB) to enable derivations of Thresholds of Toxicological Concern (TTC) for cancer potency

The purpose of this study was to update the existing Cancer Potency Database (CPDB) in order to support the development of a dataset of compounds, with associated points of departure (PoDs), to enable a review and update of currently applied values for the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) for cancer endpoints. This update of the current CPDB, last reviewed in 2012, includes the addition of new data (44 compounds and 158 studies leading to additional 359 dose-response curves). Strict inclusion criteria were established and applied to select compounds and studies with relevant cancer potency data. PoDs were calculated from dose-response modeling, including the benchmark dose (BMD) and the lower 90% confidence limits (BMDL) at a specified benchmark response (BMR) of 10%. The updated full CPDB database resulted in a total of 421 chemicals which had dose-response data that could be used to calculate PoDs. This candidate dataset for cancer TTC is provided in a transparent and adaptable format for further analysis of TTC to derive cancer potency thresholds.

Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) in the evaluation of drinking water contact chemicals

The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) is an approach for assessing the safety of chemicals with low levels of exposure for which limited toxicology data are available. The original TTC criteria were derived for oral exposures from a distributional analysis of a dataset of 613 chemicals that identified 5th percentile no observed effect level (NOEL) values grouped within three tiers of compounds having specific structural functional groups and/or toxic potencies known as Cramer I, II and III classifications. Subsequent assessments of the TTC approach have established current thresholds to be scientifically robust. While the TTC has gained acknowledgment and acceptance by many regulatory agencies and organizations, use of the TTC approach in evaluating drinking water chemicals has been limited. To apply the TTC concept to drinking water chemicals, an exposure-based approach that incorporates the current weight of evidence for the target chemical is presented. Such an approach provides a comparative point of departure to the 5th percentile TTC NOEL using existing data, while conserving the allocation of toxicological resources for quantitative risk assessment to chemicals with greater exposure or toxicity. This approach will be considered for incorporation into NSF/ANSI/CAN 600, a health effects standard used in the safety evaluation of chemicals present in drinking water from drinking water contact additives and materials certified to NSF/ANSI/CAN 60 and 61, respectively.

Evaluation of functional candidate biomarkers of non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogenicity in human liver spheroid co-cultures

Validated in vitro assays for testing non-genotoxic carcinogenic potential of chemicals are currently not available. Consequently, the two-year rodent bioassay remains the gold standard method for the identification of these chemicals. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses have provided a comprehensive understanding of the non-genotoxic carcinogenic processes, however, functional changes induced by effects at transcriptional and translational levels have not been addressed. The present study was set up to test a number of proposed in vitro biomarkers of non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogenicity at the functional level using a translational 3-dimensional model. Spheroid cultures of human hepatocytes and stellate cells were exposed to 5 genotoxic carcinogenic, 5 non-genotoxic carcinogenic, and 5 non-carcinogenic chemical compounds and assessed for oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, endoplasmic reticulum stress, apoptosis, and inflammation. The spheroid model could capture many of these events triggered by the genotoxic carcinogenic chemicals, particularly aflatoxin B1 and hydroquinone. Nonetheless, no clear distinction could be made between genotoxic and non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogenicity. Therefore, spheroid cultures of human liver cells may be appropriate in vitro tools for mechanistic investigation of chemical-induced hepatocarcinogenicity, however, these mechanisms and their read-outs do not seem to be eligible biomarkers for detecting non-genotoxic carcinogenic chemicals.

Prioritization of chemicals in food for risk assessment by integrating exposure estimates and new approach methodologies: A next generation risk assessment case study

Next generation risk assessment is defined as a knowledge-driven system that allows for cost-efficient assessment of human health risk related to chemical exposure, without animal experimentation. One of the key features of next generation risk assessment is to facilitate prioritization of chemical substances that need a more extensive toxicological evaluation, in order to address the need to assess an increasing number of substances. In this case study focusing on chemicals in food, we explored how exposure data combined with the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) concept could be used to prioritize chemicals, both for existing substances and new substances entering the market. Using a database of existing chemicals relevant for dietary exposure we calculated exposure estimates, followed by application of the TTC concept to identify substances of higher concern. Subsequently, a selected set of these priority substances was screened for toxicological potential using high-throughput screening (HTS) approaches. Remarkably, this approach resulted in alerts for a selection of substances that are already on the market and represent relevant exposure in consumers. Taken together, the case study provides proof-of-principle for the approach taken to identify substances of concern, and this approach can therefore be considered a supportive element to a next generation risk assessment strategy.