1
|
López Martí Á, Montero Palma C, López Martí H, Ranchal Sánchez A. Efficacy of probiotic, prebiotic, synbiotic and postbiotic supplementation on gastrointestinal health in cats: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Small Anim Pract 2025; 66:219-235. [PMID: 39800337 PMCID: PMC12000713 DOI: 10.1111/jsap.13822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2024] [Revised: 11/25/2024] [Accepted: 12/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The clinical efficacy of the use of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and postbiotics (biotics) in cats is unknown, despite their use in daily practice. The objectives of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of biotic supplementation in treating and preventing gastroenteropathies, and in reducing gastrointestinal signs associated with antibiotics in cats. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review was conducted by searching four databases for publications before August 2, 2024, following a pre-registered protocol. Eligible publications were trials involving healthy cats or those with gastroenteropathies, supplemented with biotics (and an inactive control), studying outcomes such as faecal consistency, faecal microbiota or vomiting. Risk of bias and quality of reports were assessed. Effects were synthesised by meta-analyses and vote counting based on direction of effect. Certainty of evidence was rated using GRADE approach. RESULTS Twenty reports were included, presenting unclear or low risk of bias. The evidence did not permit a high-confidence evaluation of the effectiveness of biotics, although five of the seven probiotic trials showed beneficial effects on faecal consistency. Synbiotics presented no clinically relevant effect in reducing antibiotics-associated vomiting, with very low certainty, in a meta-analysis including 32 adult cats. Probiotics significantly reduce the Bacillota/Actinomycetota ratio, with low certainty, in a meta-analysis involving 34 healthy young-adult cats. Following vote counting, probiotics improved immune profile in young cats, and increased butyric acid concentration in healthy cats. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Current data highlight the need for further research, especially focused on at-risk groups and sick cats, before advocating the use of biotic supplementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Á. López Martí
- Institute of Postgraduate StudiesUniversity of CordobaCordobaSpain
| | | | - H. López Martí
- Faculty of Medicine and NursingUniversity of CordobaCordobaSpain
| | - A. Ranchal Sánchez
- Department of Nursing, Pharmacology and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and NursingUniversity of CordobaCordobaSpain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhu S, Guo Z, Liu L, Gao Y, Bai L, Chen Y, Zha M. Complex Probiotics Relieve Constipation Through Regulation of the Intestinal Microbiota in Kittens. Microorganisms 2025; 13:563. [PMID: 40142456 PMCID: PMC11945230 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms13030563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2025] [Revised: 02/24/2025] [Accepted: 02/27/2025] [Indexed: 03/28/2025] Open
Abstract
The early developmental phase is a critical window for feline growth, during which immature digestive systems are susceptible to microbiome imbalances caused by environmental stressors. Our research employed macrogenomic analysis to evaluate how complex probiotic formulations influence growth metrics and gastrointestinal flora in juvenile felines. Two dozen healthy kittens were equally divided into the control group and the probiotics group following a 5-day environmental adaptation phase. Fecal scores were recorded daily for all kittens. Fresh fecal samples were collected on days 1 and 14 for macrogenomic analysis. The results showed a significantly lower rate of constipation in the probiotics group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in intestinal microbial diversity or structure between the two groups. Metagenomic analysis revealed a higher relative abundance of Bifidobacterium animalis in the probiotics group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Additionally, the probiotics group exhibited lower relative abundances of Lachnospiraceae bacterium 2 1 58FAA, Lachnospiraceae bacterium 1 1 57FAA, and Acidaminococcus intestini compared to the control group (p < 0.05). These results suggest that complex probiotics can regulate the intestinal microbiota, improve constipation, and promote intestinal health in kittens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shimin Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China; (S.Z.); (Z.G.); (L.L.); (Y.G.); (L.B.); (Y.C.)
- Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
| | - Zhengrong Guo
- Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China; (S.Z.); (Z.G.); (L.L.); (Y.G.); (L.B.); (Y.C.)
- Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
| | - Lin Liu
- Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China; (S.Z.); (Z.G.); (L.L.); (Y.G.); (L.B.); (Y.C.)
- Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
| | - Yuan Gao
- Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China; (S.Z.); (Z.G.); (L.L.); (Y.G.); (L.B.); (Y.C.)
- Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
| | - Lu Bai
- Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China; (S.Z.); (Z.G.); (L.L.); (Y.G.); (L.B.); (Y.C.)
- Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
| | - Yongfu Chen
- Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China; (S.Z.); (Z.G.); (L.L.); (Y.G.); (L.B.); (Y.C.)
- Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
| | - Musu Zha
- Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China; (S.Z.); (Z.G.); (L.L.); (Y.G.); (L.B.); (Y.C.)
- Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Swanson KS, Allenspach K, Amos G, Auchtung TA, Bassett SA, Bjørnvad CR, Everaert N, Martín-Orúe SM, Ricke SC, Ryan EP, Fahey GC. Use of biotics in animals: impact on nutrition, health, and food production. J Anim Sci 2025; 103:skaf061. [PMID: 40036559 PMCID: PMC12010704 DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaf061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2025] [Indexed: 03/06/2025] Open
Abstract
Probiotics, prebiotics, and other biotic substances are not only effective ways to promote a healthy gastrointestinal tract, an effective immune system, and the overall health of humans, but also in agricultural and companion animals. Because key differences exist in regard to gastrointestinal tract anatomy and physiology, dietary management and feeding strategy, and disease susceptibility, however, biotic types and amounts often differ according to host species and life stage. Despite these differences, the literature demonstrates the value of biotics in agricultural and companion animal species. While high variability in responsiveness and efficacy has been reported, biotic substances may be effectively used to improve digestion, reduce morbidity, increase growth rate and/or efficiency in agricultural animals and promote gastrointestinal health and immune response in companion animals. As the oversight of antibiotic use intensifies, the population density of animals and humans increases, and production strategies of agricultural animals are more heavily scrutinized, the importance of biotics and other health promotors will continue to increase in the future. To date, the effects of animal biotic use have focused primarily on the farm, home, or veterinary clinic. In the future, their impact must be viewed on a larger scale. As global "One Health" approaches seek to reduce antimicrobial use and resistance and there are increasing demands for sustainable and safe food production, biotics will continue to be an important part of the solution. As knowledge of gastrointestinal microbiomes grows and the biotic field develops, more targeted and effective strategies for health promotion in these species are expected. At the 2023 International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics meeting, experts were invited to participate in a discussion group focused on "The Use of Probiotics and Prebiotics in Agricultural and Companion Animals". This review reports the outcomes of that discussion, including the documented use of probiotics, prebiotics, and other biotic substances to promote health or treat disease in agricultural and companion animals, provide implications of animal biotic use on human health, and provide perspective on how scientific advances may impact the development and improvement of biotics in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly S Swanson
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Karin Allenspach
- Department of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | - Gregory Amos
- Waltham Petcare Science Institute, Melton Mowbray LE13, UK
| | | | - Shalome A Bassett
- Fonterra Limited, Fonterra Research & Development Centre, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
- Riddet Institute, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
| | - Charlotte R Bjørnvad
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Susana M Martín-Orúe
- Department of Animal and Food Science, Animal Nutrition and Welfare Service, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Steven C Ricke
- Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Meat Science and Animal Biologics Discovery Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | - Elizabeth P Ryan
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA
| | - George C Fahey
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wilson SM, Swanson KS. The influence of 'biotics' on the gut microbiome of dogs and cats. Vet Rec 2024; 195:2-12. [PMID: 39545542 DOI: 10.1002/vetr.4914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2024]
Abstract
A global rise in pet ownership and an increasing tendency towards the humanisation of pets have resulted in a greater focus on improving animal health and longevity. These developments coincide with the increased recognition of the role of the gut microbiome in animal health. The gut microbiome has been shown to play a prominent role in gastrointestinal health, and it is becoming increasingly clear that these health benefits extend beyond the gut and into different physiological systems, such as the immune system. Dietary supplementation with products known as 'biotics', which include probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and postbiotics, is a strategy used to modify the gut microbiome and promote host health. Although biotics have been successfully used in companion animals, questions remain regarding appropriate biotic selection, mechanisms of action, optimum inclusion levels and safety. This review aims to summarise the effects of biotics on the gut microbiome of dogs and cats and assess their potential role in supporting gastrointestinal health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia M Wilson
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - Kelly S Swanson
- Department of Animal Sciences, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shah H, Trivedi M, Gurjar T, Sahoo DK, Jergens AE, Yadav VK, Patel A, Pandya P. Decoding the Gut Microbiome in Companion Animals: Impacts and Innovations. Microorganisms 2024; 12:1831. [PMID: 39338505 PMCID: PMC11433972 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12091831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2024] [Revised: 08/26/2024] [Accepted: 08/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
The changing notion of "companion animals" and their increasing global status as family members underscores the dynamic interaction between gut microbiota and host health. This review provides a comprehensive understanding of the intricate microbial ecology within companion animals required to maintain overall health and prevent disease. Exploration of specific diseases and syndromes linked to gut microbiome alterations (dysbiosis), such as inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, and neurological conditions like epilepsy, are highlighted. In addition, this review provides an analysis of the various factors that impact the abundance of the gut microbiome like age, breed, habitual diet, and microbe-targeted interventions, such as probiotics. Detection methods including PCR-based algorithms, fluorescence in situ hybridisation, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing are reviewed, along with their limitations and the need for future advancements. Prospects for longitudinal investigations, functional dynamics exploration, and accurate identification of microbial signatures associated with specific health problems offer promising directions for future research. In summary, it is an attempt to provide a deeper insight into the orchestration of multiple microbial species shaping the health of companion animals and possible species-specific differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harsh Shah
- TREE Lab, Department of Biomedical and Life Sciences, School of Science, Navrachana University, Vadodara 391410, India (M.T.)
| | - Mithil Trivedi
- TREE Lab, Department of Biomedical and Life Sciences, School of Science, Navrachana University, Vadodara 391410, India (M.T.)
| | - Tejas Gurjar
- TREE Lab, Department of Biomedical and Life Sciences, School of Science, Navrachana University, Vadodara 391410, India (M.T.)
| | - Dipak Kumar Sahoo
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA;
| | - Albert E. Jergens
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA;
| | - Virendra Kumar Yadav
- Marwadi University Research Center, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, Marwadi University, Rajkot 360003, India;
| | - Ashish Patel
- Department of Life Sciences, Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University, Patan 384265, India;
| | - Parth Pandya
- TREE Lab, Department of Biomedical and Life Sciences, School of Science, Navrachana University, Vadodara 391410, India (M.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang W, Dong H, Chang X, Chen Q, Wang L, Chen S, Chen L, Wang R, Ge S, Wang P, Li Y, Liu S, Xiong W. Bifidobacterium lactis and Lactobacillus plantarum Enhance Immune Function and Antioxidant Capacity in Cats through Modulation of the Gut Microbiota. Antioxidants (Basel) 2024; 13:764. [PMID: 39061833 PMCID: PMC11273429 DOI: 10.3390/antiox13070764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2024] [Revised: 06/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) afflictions are prevalent among the feline population, wherein the intricacies of the gut microbiome exert a profound influence on their overall health. Alterations within this microbial consortium can precipitate a cascade of physiological changes, notably in immune function and antioxidant capacity. This research investigated the impact of Bifidobacterium lactis (B. lactis) and Lactobacillus plantarum (L. plantarum) on cats' GI health, exploring the effects of probiotic supplementation on the intestinal ecosystem using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The findings demonstrated a significant improvement in gut barrier function by reducing plasma concentrations of D-lactate (D-LA) by 30.38% and diamine oxidase (DAO) by 22.68%, while increasing the population of beneficial bacteria such as Lactobacillus. There was a notable 25% increase in immunoglobulin A (IgA) levels, evidenced by increases of 19.13% in catalase (CAT), 23.94% in superoxide dismutase (SOD), and 21.81% in glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px). Further analysis revealed positive correlations between Lactobacillus abundance and IgA, CAT, and total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) levels. These correlations indicate that B. lactis and L. plantarum enhance feline immune and antioxidant functions by increasing the abundance of beneficial Lactobacillus in the GI tract. These findings provide a foundation for probiotic interventions aimed at enhancing health and disease resistance in feline populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiwei Wang
- Food Laboratory of Zhongyuan, Luohe 462300, China; (W.W.); (H.D.); (X.C.); (Q.C.); (S.C.); (L.C.)
| | - Hao Dong
- Food Laboratory of Zhongyuan, Luohe 462300, China; (W.W.); (H.D.); (X.C.); (Q.C.); (S.C.); (L.C.)
| | - Xiaohan Chang
- Food Laboratory of Zhongyuan, Luohe 462300, China; (W.W.); (H.D.); (X.C.); (Q.C.); (S.C.); (L.C.)
| | - Qianqian Chen
- Food Laboratory of Zhongyuan, Luohe 462300, China; (W.W.); (H.D.); (X.C.); (Q.C.); (S.C.); (L.C.)
| | - Longjiao Wang
- Key Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China; (L.W.); (R.W.); (S.G.); (P.W.); (Y.L.); (S.L.)
| | - Shuxing Chen
- Food Laboratory of Zhongyuan, Luohe 462300, China; (W.W.); (H.D.); (X.C.); (Q.C.); (S.C.); (L.C.)
| | - Lishui Chen
- Food Laboratory of Zhongyuan, Luohe 462300, China; (W.W.); (H.D.); (X.C.); (Q.C.); (S.C.); (L.C.)
| | - Ran Wang
- Key Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China; (L.W.); (R.W.); (S.G.); (P.W.); (Y.L.); (S.L.)
| | - Shaoyang Ge
- Key Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China; (L.W.); (R.W.); (S.G.); (P.W.); (Y.L.); (S.L.)
| | - Pengjie Wang
- Key Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China; (L.W.); (R.W.); (S.G.); (P.W.); (Y.L.); (S.L.)
| | - Yixuan Li
- Key Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China; (L.W.); (R.W.); (S.G.); (P.W.); (Y.L.); (S.L.)
| | - Siyuan Liu
- Key Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China; (L.W.); (R.W.); (S.G.); (P.W.); (Y.L.); (S.L.)
| | - Wei Xiong
- Food Laboratory of Zhongyuan, Luohe 462300, China; (W.W.); (H.D.); (X.C.); (Q.C.); (S.C.); (L.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zha M, Zhu S, Chen Y. Probiotics and Cat Health: A Review of Progress and Prospects. Microorganisms 2024; 12:1080. [PMID: 38930462 PMCID: PMC11205573 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12061080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Cats are increasingly favored as companion animals; their health has drawn widespread attention. Given the continuous improvements in the required living standards of both humans and animals, inflammatory bowel disease, allergies, diarrhea, constipation, periodontal disease, obesity, diabetes, and other health issues have become recognized as valid pet problems. Antibiotics are commonly used to treat pet diseases, greatly improving animal health. However, antibiotic abuse is common, especially when seeking to treat bacterial infections. Probiotics are beneficial microorganisms that may be directly ingested in food or as feed additives; they improve the intestinal microflora balance, enhance immunity, and ensure healthy growth. However, cat data are usually inferred from reports on dogs or humans; cat research remains preliminary in nature. Therefore, we here describe the current understanding of how probiotics improve cat health, facilitating the further development and application of probiotics for cats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Musu Zha
- Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China;
| | | | - Yongfu Chen
- Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang Q, Wu Z. Gut Probiotics and Health of Dogs and Cats: Benefits, Applications, and Underlying Mechanisms. Microorganisms 2023; 11:2452. [PMID: 37894110 PMCID: PMC10609632 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11102452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Pets (mostly domestic dogs and cats) play an important role in the daily lives of humans and their health has attracted growing attention from pet owners. The intestinal microbiota, a complex microbial community with barrier-protective, nutritional, metabolic, and immunological functions, is integral to host health. Dysbiosis has been related to a variety of diseases in humans and animals. Probiotics have been used in functional foods and dietary supplements to modulate intestinal microbiota and promote host health, which has been introduced in pet dogs and cats in recent years. Various canine- and feline-derived probiotic strains have been isolated and characterized. The administration of probiotics has shown positive effects on the gut health and can alleviate some intestinal diseases and disorders in dogs and cats, although the underlying mechanisms are largely unresolved. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the benefits of probiotics and discuss their possible mechanisms in dogs and cats in order to provide new insights for the further development and application of probiotics in pets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zhenlong Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Companion Animal Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
| |
Collapse
|