First Report on Successful Conversion of Long-Term Treatment of Recurrent Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome With Eculizumab to Ravulizumab in a Renal Transplant Patient

Complement in Antibody-Mediated Rejection of the Kidney Graft: From Pathophysiology to Clinical Practice

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a leading cause of kidney graft failure. Complement activation is involved in the AMR process. Our aim is to provide the current understanding of the pathophysiology related to complement-mediated injury in AMR, to present the current evidence regarding complement blockade in AMR management, and to point out emerging therapies and future directions in this area. The complement system plays an important role in the onset and progression of AMR. There is a balance between complement-dependent and -independent mechanisms in the development of rejection lesions. Classic and leptin pathways are involved in this process. C4d positivity is no longer a mandatory feature for AMR diagnosis but remains an independent predictor of negative outcomes. The current evidence regarding AMR treatment is limited. Terminal and proximal complement blockade has gained recognition in clinical practice. Eculizumab and C1 inhibitors are effective in the treatment of AMR as adjuvant therapies to the standard of care. The availability of novel complement inhibitors will lead to more effective and tailored treatment strategies.

Global aHUS Registry Analysis of Patients Switching to Ravulizumab From Eculizumab

Introduction

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a progressive rare disease that, if untreated, can result in severe organ damage and death. Ravulizumab, a next-generation terminal complement inhibitor, provides immediate, complete, and sustained complement C5 inhibition. Real-world data in patients with aHUS who switched to ravulizumab from eculizumab are lacking.

Methods

The Global aHUS Registry is a multicenter study (NCT01522183) collecting data on adult or pediatric patients with an aHUS diagnosis, regardless of treatment. Patient characteristics, genetic data, hematological and renal parameters, clinical events (e.g., dialysis and kidney transplantation), and adverse events (AEs) were extracted from patients who switched to ravulizumab from eculizumab up to July 3, 2023.

Results

Overall, 60 patients switched to ravulizumab (adult: n = 43; pediatric: n = 17); 11 patients were excluded from effectiveness and genetic analyses (N = 49; adult: n = 40; pediatric: n = 9) because they received <3 months ravulizumab treatment and/or had >1 month between eculizumab discontinuation and ravulizumab initiation. Pathogenic complement variants were identified in 11 of 49 patients (22%); the most common was a complement factor H variant (n = 5/49 [10%]). During ravulizumab treatment, 20 AEs occurred in 13 patients, with no unexpected AEs and only 3 treatment-related AEs (infusion reaction, headaches, and fatigue). No meningococcal infections or deaths were reported. No new events of dialysis, kidney transplantation, or thrombotic microangiopathy were reported. Renal and hematological parameters remained stable after switching to ravulizumab.

Conclusion

This is the first real-world cohort analysis of data from patients treated with ravulizumab and reinforces the real-world safety and effectiveness data of ravulizumab in patients with aHUS who switched from eculizumab.

Clinical efficacy and safety of switching from eculizumab to ravulizumab in adult patients with aHUS- real-world data

BACKGROUND

The complement factor 5 (C5)-inhibitor eculizumab has been established as standard-of-care for the treatment of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). In 2021, the long-acting C5-inhibitor ravulizumab was approved, extending intervals of intravenous treatment from two to eight weeks resulting in improvement of quality of life for patients and lowering direct and indirect therapy associated costs.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective data analysis of 32 adult patients with aHUS (including 10 kidney transplant recipients) treated with eculizumab for at least three months and switched to ravulizumab aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of switching medication in the real-world setting. Hematologic parameters, kidney function, concurrent therapy and aHUS associated events were evaluated three months before and until up to 12 months after switching to ravulizumab.

RESULTS

Mean age (range) at ravulizumab initiation was 41 years (19-78 years) and 59% of the patients were female. Genetic analysis was available for all patients with 72% showing a pathogenic variant. Median time (range) on eculizumab before switching was 20 months (3-120 months). No new events of TMA or worsening of renal function were reported during up to 12 months of follow-up during ravulizumab treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest, non-industry derived, multi-center retrospective analysis of adult patients with aHUS switching C5-inhibitor treatment from eculizumab to ravulizumab in the real-world setting. Switching to ravulizumab was safe and efficient resulting in sustained hematological stability and preservation of renal function.

The role of anticomplement therapy in the management of the kidney allograft

As the number of patients living with kidney failure grows, the need also grows for kidney transplantation, the gold standard kidney replacement therapy that provides a survival advantage. This may result in an increased rate of transplantation from HLA-mismatched donors that increases the rate of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which already is the leading cause of allograft failure. Plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, anti-CD20 therapies (i.e., rituximab), bortezomib and splenectomy have been used over the years to treat AMR as well as to prevent AMR in high-risk sensitized kidney transplant recipients. Eculizumab and ravulizumab are monoclonal antibodies targeting the C5 protein of the complement pathway and part of the expanding field of anticomplement therapies, which is not limited to kidney transplant recipients, and also includes complement-mediated microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, and ANCA-vasculitis. In this narrative review, we summarize the current knowledge concerning the pathophysiological background and use of anti-C5 strategies (eculizumab and ravulizumab) and C1-esterase inhibitor in AMR, either to prevent AMR in high-risk desensitized patients or to treat AMR as first-line or rescue therapy and also to treat de novo thrombotic microangiopathy in kidney transplant recipients.

Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Treated With Ravulizumab or Eculizumab: A Claims-Based Evaluation of Health Care Resource Utilization and Clinical Outcomes in the United States

Rationale and Objective

Ravulizumab and eculizumab have shown efficacy for the treatment of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), but real-world evidence for ravulizumab is limited owing to its more recent approval. This real-world database study examined outcomes for adult patients switching to ravulizumab from eculizumab and patients treated with individual treatments.

Study Design

A retrospective, observational study using the Clarivate Real World Database.

Setting and Population

US health-insurance billing data (January 2012 to March 2021) of patients aged 18 years or older with ≥1 diagnosis relevant to aHUS, ≥1 claim for treatment with eculizumab or ravulizumab, and no evidence of other indicated conditions.

Exposures

Treatment-switch (to ravulizumab after eculizumab), ravulizumab-only, and eculizumab-only cohorts were examined.

Outcomes

Clinical procedures, facility visits, health care costs, and clinical manifestations.

Analytical Approach

Paired-sample statistical testing compared the mean numbers of claims for each group 0-3 months before (preindex period) and 0-3 months and 3-6 months after (postindex period) the index date (point of initiation with a single treatment or treatment switch).

Results

In total, 322 patients met the eligibility criteria at 3-6 months postindex in the treatment-switch (n=65), ravulizumab-only (n=9), and eculizumab-only (n=248) cohorts. The proportions of patients with claims for key clinical procedures continued to be small after treatment switch and were small (0%-11%) across all cohorts at 3-6 months postindex. Inpatient visits were reduced in the postindex period across all cohorts. At 3-6 months after treatment switch, patients reported fewer claims for outpatient, private practice, and home visits and lower median health care costs. The proportions of patients with claims for clinical manifestations of aHUS were generally reduced in the postindex period compared with those of the preindex period.

Limitations

Low patient numbers receiving ravulizumab only.

Conclusions

The health-insurance claims data showed a reduced health care burden for US adult patients after treatment with ravulizumab or eculizumab for treatment of aHUS.