Newly emerging type B insulin resistance (TBIR) during treatment with eculizumab for AQP4-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD): fatal outcome

BACKGROUND

Aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are frequently associated with other autoimmune disorders, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Eculizumab (ECU) is a highly effective long-term treatment for NMOSD. However, ECU is known to increase significantly the risk of infection with encapsulated bacteria and sepsis. Recently, increased insulin resistance (IR) in patients with NMOSD has been suggested. Type B IR (TBIR) is a rare autoimmune condition often accompanying or preceding SLE. TBIR has not yet been reported in NMOSD.

OBJECTIVE

To report an ECU-treated patient with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD who developed fatal septic complications after the emergence of TBIR.

METHODS

Description of the clinical course over a period of 8 years.

RESULTS

A female patient was diagnosed with NMOSD at the age of 16 years. A variety of disease-modifying drugs failed to achieve sufficient disease control, resulting in severe tetraparesis. Treatment with ECU was started 6 years after NMOSD diagnosis and stabilized the disease. The patient developed TBIR 8 months after initiation of ECU therapy. Following high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone therapy for a clinical relapse and three further courses of ECU, the patient was admitted with severe pneumonia caused by the encapsulated bacterium Klebsiella pneumoniae and hypoglycemia. Despite multimodal therapy, the patient died from sepsis-related multiorgan failure 18 months after initiation of ECU.

CONCLUSIONS

TBIR should be considered as differential diagnosis in patients with NMOSD presenting with disturbed glucose metabolism, irrespective of the presence of SLE. More real-world data are needed on the risk/benefit ratio of ECU treatment in patients who have co-existing autoimmune comorbidities that may compromise immune function. Strategies to mitigate the risk of serious infection in patients treated with ECU are discussed.

Efgartigimod and Ravulizumab for Treating Acetylcholine Receptor Auto-antibody-Positive (AChR-Ab+) Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Indirect Treatment Comparison

INTRODUCTION

Efgartigimod and ravulizumab, both approved for treating acetylcholine receptor auto-antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), have not been directly compared. This paper assessed comparative effects of efgartigimod vs. ravulizumab for treating adults with AChR-Ab+ gMG using indirect treatment comparison methods.

METHODS

The matching-adjusted indirect comparison used data from two randomized trials of adult men and women. The ADAPT (efgartigimod vs. placebo; individual patient data available) population was reweighted to match the CHAMPION (ravulizumab vs. placebo; index study; aggregate data available) population. The relative effect of efgartigimod versus placebo was estimated in this reweighted population and compared with the observed ravulizumab versus placebo effect to estimate the efgartigimod versus ravulizumab effect. The outcomes were Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG), and Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15-item-revised scale (MG-QoL15r) assessed as cumulative effect (area under the curve; AUC) over 26 weeks (primary) and change from baseline at 4 weeks and time of best response (week 4 for efgartigimod; week 26 for ravulizumab).

RESULTS

For MG-QoL15r, efgartigimod had a statistically significant improvement compared with ravulizumab over 26 weeks [mean difference (95% confidence interval): - 52.6 (- 103.0, - 2.3)], at week 4 [- 4.0 (- 6.6, - 1.4)], and at time of best response [- 3.9 (- 6.5, - 1.3)]. Efgartigimod had a statistically significant improvement over ravulizumab in MG-ADL at week 4 [- 1.9 (- 3.3, - 0.5)] and at time of best response [- 1.4 (- 2.8, 0.0)] and in QMG at week 4 [- 3.2 (- 5.2, - 1.2)] and at time of best response [- 3.0 (- 5.0, - 1.0)]. For AUC over 26 weeks, improvements were not significantly different between efgartigimod and ravulizumab for MG-ADL [- 8.7 (- 36.1, 18.8)] and QMG [- 13.7 (- 50.3, 22.9)].

CONCLUSION

Efgartigimod may provide a faster and greater improvement over 26 weeks in quality of life than ravulizumab in adults with AChR-Ab+ gMG. Efgartigimod showed faster improvements in MG-ADL and QMG than ravulizumab.

Dosing Patterns of Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria Treated with Ravulizumab in the United States: A Retrospective Claims-Based Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Complement factor 5 inhibitors eculizumab and, recently, ravulizumab are standard therapies for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). However, some patients experience suboptimal response and may benefit from dosage adjustments. Ravulizumab is administered less frequently than eculizumab on the basis of patient's body weight. This retrospective analysis of insurance claims investigated ravulizumab dosing patterns among patients with PNH from the USA.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 12 years with ≥ 2 ravulizumab infusions between June 21, 2019 and May 6, 2021, and ≥ 6 months of continuous clinical activity prior to first ravulizumab infusion (index date) were identified from the Symphony Health Integrated Dataverse (IDV®) database. Observed mean (standard deviation, SD) ravulizumab doses administered were reported and stratified by previous eculizumab use. Scenarios adjusting for patients' body weights (unavailable in Symphony Health IDV) based on the US general population distribution were performed to estimate percentages of patients receiving label-recommended doses.

RESULTS

Among 433 patients (mean [SD] age 47 [17] years), the mean (SD) loading dose was 3316.3 (2931.7) mg, greater than the maximal label-recommended loading dose (3000 mg for patients ≥ 100 kg). The mean (SD) loading doses were 3581.3 (3673.7) mg for eculizumab-naive versus 3093.1 (2096.8) mg for eculizumab-experienced patients. Over a mean (SD) treatment period of 11.8 (6.9) months, the mean (SD) average maintenance dose was 3403.7 (1024.4) mg, falling between label-recommended maintenance dose categories (3300 mg for ≥ 60 to < 100 kg; 3600 mg for ≥ 100 kg). Estimated percentages of patients receiving label-recommended loading and maintenance doses were 23.1% and 39.2%, respectively; 59.1% and 28.4% were estimated to receive above label-recommended loading and average maintenance doses, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although limited by missing clinical characteristics including body weight, this study of ravulizumab dosing patterns in patients with PNH identified potential deviations from label-recommended dosing, warranting further investigations of treatment response to complement inhibitors in PNH.

Predictors for improvement in patient-reported outcomes: post hoc analysis of a phase 3 randomized, open-label study of eculizumab and ravulizumab in complement inhibitor-naive patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is characterized by uncontrolled terminal complement activation leading to intravascular hemolysis (IVH), thrombosis, and impairments in quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study was to identify the clinical drivers of improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with PNH receiving the complement component 5 (C5) inhibitors eculizumab and ravulizumab.This post hoc analysis assessed clinical outcomes and PROs from 246 complement inhibitor-naive patients with PNH enrolled in a phase 3 randomized non-inferiority study that compared the C5 inhibitors ravulizumab and eculizumab (study 301; NCT02946463). The variables of interest were lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, a surrogate measure of IVH, and hemoglobin (Hb) levels. PROs were collected using Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) to assess fatigue and QoL, respectively.Improvements in absolute mean LDH levels were significantly associated with improvements in mean FACIT-F score (p = 0.0024) and EORTC QLQ-C30 global health (GH) score (p < 0.0001) from baseline to day 183. Improvements in scores were achieved despite a non-significant increase in Hb levels. To understand the interaction between LDH and Hb, a regression analysis was performed: LDH response with Hb improvements was a significant predictor of improvement in fatigue. The independent effect of improved Hb did not significantly affect FACIT-F or EORTC QLQ-C30 GH scores.These findings suggest that LDH levels are an important determinant of fatigue and QoL outcomes in patients with PNH. CTR: NCT02946463, October 27, 2016.

Cost-effectiveness of ravulizumab compared with eculizumab for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ravulizumab compared with eculizumab for the treatment of adult patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) in the Netherlands.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted based on a Markov cohort model simulating the course of patients with PNH with clinical symptom(s) indicative of high disease activity, or who are clinically stable after having been treated with eculizumab for at least the past six months. Costs, quality of life, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were estimated over a lifetime horizon from a Dutch societal perspective. Several additional analyses were performed, including a one-way sensitivity analysis, a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and scenario analysis.

RESULTS

When compared with eculizumab, ravulizumab saves €266,833 and 1.57 quality adjusted life years (QALYs) are gained, resulting in a dominant ICER. Drug costs account for the majority of the total costs in both intervention groups. Cost savings were driven by the difference in total treatment costs of ravulizumab compared with eculizumab caused by the reduced administration frequency, accounting for 98% of the total cost savings. The QALY gain with ravulizumab is largely attributable to the improved quality of life associated with less frequent infusions and BTH events. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000/QALY, there is a 76.6% probability that ravulizumab would be cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost reduction and QALY gain associated with the lower rates of BTH and less frequent administration make ravulizumab a cost-saving and clinically beneficial substitute for eculizumab for adults with PNH in the Netherlands.

Summary of Research: Terminal Complement Inhibitor Ravulizumab in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

This article provides a summary of a previously published paper: Terminal Complement Inhibitor Ravulizumab in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis. The paper reported the results of the CHAMPION-MG trial which investigated the drug ravulizumab in the rare disease, myasthenia gravis. Terminal Complement Inhibitor Ravulizumab in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis (MP4 594600 KB).

Interim analysis of post-marketing surveillance of ravulizumab for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria in Japan

Ravulizumab is a long-acting C5 inhibitor available for treating paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). Post-marketing surveillance (PMS) was implemented following its approval in September 2019 in Japan. We report safety data obtained through to December 2021 for 218 patients and effectiveness data for 194 patients (182 switched from eculizumab and 12 complement inhibitor-naïve). Over a median follow-up of 74.4 weeks, 193 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 66/218 patients (30.3%; incidence 72.73/100 patient-years). The two most frequent AEs were anemia and pyrexia (each 3.01/100 patient-years). The incidence of serious AEs was 36.93/100 patient-years. In patients who switched from eculizumab, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and hemoglobin (Hb) levels were maintained over 26 weeks of ravulizumab treatment. In complement inhibitor-naïve patients, LDH decreased significantly and Hb increased significantly over 26 weeks of ravulizumab treatment. These data for Japanese patients with PNH who were naïve to complement inhibitors and patients who switched from eculizumab show that the safety and effectiveness of ravulizumab are consistent with the published clinical trial data. However, transfusion independence was less likely in patients with bone marrow failure. Further follow-up data from this PMS will help to elucidate the long-term clinical safety and effectiveness of ravulizumab for treating PNH.

Long-term efficacy and safety of ravulizumab in adults with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis: results from the phase 3 CHAMPION MG open-label extension

INTRODUCTION

Ravulizumab demonstrated efficacy and an acceptable safety profile versus placebo in the randomized controlled period (RCP) of the phase 3 CHAMPION MG trial in patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis. We report an interim analysis of the ongoing open-label extension (OLE) designed to evaluate long-term treatment effects.

METHODS

Following completion of the 26-week RCP, patients could enter the OLE; patients who received ravulizumab in the RCP continued the drug; patients who previously received placebo switched to ravulizumab. Patients receive body-weight-based maintenance dosing of ravulizumab every 8 weeks. Efficacy endpoints up to 60 weeks included Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores, with least-squares (LS) mean change and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) reported.

RESULTS

Long-term efficacy and safety in the OLE were analyzed in 161 and 169 patients, respectively. Improvements in all scores were maintained through 60 weeks in patients who received ravulizumab during the RCP; LS mean change from RCP baseline in MG-ADL score was - 4.0 (95% CI: - 4.8, - 3.1; p < 0.0001). Rapid (within 2 weeks) and sustained improvements occurred in patients previously receiving placebo; LS mean change in MG-ADL score from OLE baseline to Week 60 was - 1.7 (95% CI: - 2.7, - 0.8; p = 0.0007). Similar trends were seen in QMG scores. Ravulizumab treatment was associated with a decreased rate of clinical deterioration events compared with placebo. Ravulizumab was well tolerated; no meningococcal infections were reported.

CONCLUSION

Findings support the sustained efficacy and long-term safety of ravulizumab, administered every 8 weeks, in adults with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov identifier: NCT03920293; EudraCT: 2018-003243-39.

Ravulizumab pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

The terminal complement C5 inhibitor ravulizumab has a long elimination half-life, allowing maintenance dosing every 8 weeks. In the 26-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled period (RCP) of the CHAMPION MG study, ravulizumab provided rapid and sustained efficacy and was well tolerated in adults with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). This analysis evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and potential immunogenicity of ravulizumab in adults with AChR Ab+ gMG.

METHODS

Data were analyzed from 86 patients who received ravulizumab in the CHAMPION MG RCP. Ravulizumab dosing was weight-based: initial loading dose of 2400/2700/3000 mg on Day 1 and maintenance doses of 3000/3300/3600 mg on Day 15 and then every 8 weeks. PK parameters were estimated from serum ravulizumab concentrations determined pre- and post-dose; PD effects of ravulizumab on serum free C5 concentrations were measured; and immunogenicity was assessed using anti-drug antibody and neutralizing-antibody assays.

RESULTS

Target serum ravulizumab concentrations (> 175 µg/mL) were achieved immediately after the first ravulizumab dose (within 30 min of infusion completion) and maintained throughout the 26-week treatment period irrespective of patient body weight. Following the final maintenance dose, mean C_max was 1548 µg/mL and C_trough 587 µg/mL; no meaningful differences were noted among body-weight categories. Inhibition of serum free C5 was immediate, complete (< 0.5 μg/mL), and sustained throughout treatment in all patients. No treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

PK/PD evidence supports the use of ravulizumab every 8 weeks for immediate, complete, and sustained inhibition of terminal complement C5 in adults with AChR Ab+ gMG.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03920293 (April 18, 2019).

[Japanese patient preferences between ravulizumab and eculizumab for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria]

Ravulizumab is the first long-acting complement inhibitor approved for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) treatment. We evaluated patient preference for ravulizumab or eculizumab among Japanese adults with PNH. The ALXN1210-PNH-301 (NCT02946463) and ALXN1210-PNH-302 (NCT03056040) studies included 23 Japanese adults who are enrolled in complement inhibitor treatment-naive and eculizumab (≥6 months) treatment. Patient preference was assessed using the PNH-specific patient preference questionnaire (PNH-PPQ©). Most patients preferred ravulizumab (19/23, 82.6%), none preferred eculizumab, and four (17.4%) reported no preference (χ² test, p<0.005). The preference for ravulizumab was driven by its lower infusion frequency (every 8 weeks) compared with eculizumab (every 2 weeks). The included Japanese patients with PNH preferred ravulizumab because of its reduced infusion frequency, which increases activity planning ability, treatment convenience, and overall quality of life, as compared with eculizumab. These data provide useful insight into patient perspectives and may aid decision-making for PNH treatment.

Phase 3 Study of Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Ravulizumab in Eculizumab-Experienced Adult Patients with PNH: Primary Analysis and 1-Year Follow-Up

INTRODUCTION

This study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the ravulizumab on-body delivery system for subcutaneous (SUBQ) administration with intravenous (IV) ravulizumab in eculizumab-experienced patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH).

METHODS

Patients with PNH received SUBQ ravulizumab (n = 90) or IV ravulizumab (n = 46) during the 10-week randomized treatment period; all patients then received SUBQ ravulizumab during an extension period (< 172 weeks; data cutoff 1 year). Primary endpoint was day 71 serum ravulizumab trough concentration (C_trough). Secondary endpoints were ravulizumab C_trough and free C5 over time. Efficacy endpoints included change in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), breakthrough hemolysis (BTH), transfusion avoidance, stabilized hemoglobin, and Treatment Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (TASQ) score. Safety, including adverse events (AEs) and adverse device effects (ADEs), was assessed until data cutoff.

RESULTS

SUBQ ravulizumab demonstrated PK non-inferiority with IV ravulizumab (day 71 SUBQ/IV geometric least-squares means ratio 1.257 [90% confidence interval 1.160-1.361; p < 0.0001]). Through 1 year of SUBQ administration, ravulizumab C_trough values were > 175 μg/mL (PK threshold) and free C5 < 0.5 μg/mL (PD threshold). Efficacy endpoints remained stable: mean (standard deviation, SD) LDH percentage change was 0.9% (20.5%); BTH events, 5/128 patients (3.9%); 83.6% achieved transfusion avoidance; 79.7% achieved stabilized hemoglobin. Total TASQ score showed improved satisfaction with SUBQ ravulizumab compared with IV eculizumab (mean [SD] change at SUBQ day 351, - 69.3 [80.1]). The most common AEs during SUBQ treatment (excluding ADEs) were headache (14.1%), COVID-19 (14.1%), and pyrexia (10.9%); the most common ADE unrelated to a device product issue was injection site reaction (4.7%). Although many patients had ≥ 1 device issue-related ADE, full SUBQ dose administration was achieved in 99.9% of attempts.

CONCLUSIONS

SUBQ ravulizumab provides an additional treatment choice for patients with PNH. Patients may switch to SUBQ ravulizumab from IV eculizumab or ravulizumab without loss of efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03748823.

Pharmacological treatment of COVID-19: an opinion paper

The precocity and efficacy of the vaccines developed so far against COVID-19 has been the most significant and saving advance against the pandemic. The development of vaccines has not prevented, during the whole period of the pandemic, the constant search for therapeutic medicines, both among existing drugs with different indications and in the development of new drugs. The Scientific Committee of the COVID-19 of the Illustrious College of Physicians of Madrid wanted to offer an early, simplified and critical approach to these new drugs, to new developments in immunotherapy and to what has been learned from the immune response modulators already known and which have proven effective against the virus, in order to help understand the current situation.

The burden of illness in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria receiving treatment with the C5-inhibitors eculizumab or ravulizumab: results from a US patient survey

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare and life-threatening disease with symptoms of hemolysis and thrombosis. Current therapies for this complement-mediated disease rely predominantly on inhibition of the C5 complement protein. However, data on treatment responses and quality of life in C5-inhibitor (C5i)-treated PNH patients are scarce. The objective of this study was to determine C5i treatment effects on clinical parameters, PNH symptoms, quality of life, and resource use for PNH patients. This cross-sectional study surveyed 122 individuals in the USA receiving treatment for PNH with C5-targeted monoclonal antibodies, eculizumab (ECU) or ravulizumab (RAV). Despite most patients receiving C5i therapy for ≥ 3 months (ECU 100%, n = 35; RAV 95.4%, n = 83), many patients remained anemic with hemoglobin levels ≤ 12 g/dL in 87.5% (n = 28/32) and 82.9% (n = 68/82) of ECU and RAV recipients, respectively. A majority of patients on ECU (88.6%; n = 31/35) and RAV (74.7%; n = 65/87) reported fatigue symptoms. Among PNH patients receiving C5i therapy for ≥ 12 months, some still reported thrombotic events (ECU, 10.0%, n = 1/10; RAV, 23.5%, n = 4/17) and required transfusions within the past year (ECU, 52.2%, n = 12/23; RAV, 22.6%, n = 7/31). Other patient-reported PNH symptoms included breakthrough hemolysis, shortness of breath, and headaches. Patients reported scores below the average population norms on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) scales. Overall, this study found that PNH patients receiving ECU or RAV therapy demonstrated a significant burden of illness, highlighting the need for improved PNH therapies.

[Perioperative management of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a patient with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria undergoing ravulizumab treatment]

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is characterized by hemolysis, thrombosis, and bone marrow failure. Infection, pregnancy, and surgical operation have the potential to evoke severe episodes of hemolysis and thrombosis. Therefore, the use of an antibody agent against complement component 5 (C5), eculizumab, one day before the operation is recommended. Ravulizumab is a newly approved long-acting antibody agent against C5. Thus, little is known about perioperative management with ravulizumab. We experienced a 43-year-old female patient who safely underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy under ravulizumab treatment for PNH. Ravulizumab was administered one day before the operation. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis was performed under intravenous anesthesia, intermittent air compression of the lower extremities, and low pneumoperitoneum pressure. Additionally, heparin was administered, and the patient left the sickbed early without significant postoperative complications. Like eculizumab, complement inhibition by ravulizumab is also considered effective in the perioperative management of patients with PNH. However, close cooperation with surgeons and anesthesiologists and careful management based on clinical symptoms and laboratory data such as LDH, CH50, and D-dimer are essential.

Ravulizumab: Characterization and quantitation of a new C5 inhibitor using isotype specific affinity purification and high-resolution mass spectrometry

Introduction

Ravulizumab (RAVUL) is a new complement inhibitor, with a difference of 4 amino acids in the heavy chain from a predecessor compound, eculizumab (ECUL).

Objectives

First, to utilize mass spectrometry (MS) to characterize RAVUL and verify differences from its predecessor and, second, to validate and implement a lab developed test (LDT) for RAVUL that will allow for quantitative therapeutic monitoring.

Methods

A time-of-flight mass spectrometer (TOF-MS) was used to characterize and differentiate the molecular weight differences between RAVUL and ECUL by both digest and reduction experiments. In parallel, an LDT for RAVUL was validated and implemented utilizing IgG4 enrichment with light chain detection and quantitation on a high throughput orbitrap MS platform.

Results

The TOF-MS platform allowed for the mass difference between RAVUL and ECUL to be verified along with providing a proof of concept for a new intact protein quantitation software. An LDT on an orbitrap MS was validated and implemented using intact light chain quantitation, with the limitation that it cannot differentiate between ECUL and RAVUL. The LDT has an analytical measuring range from 5 to 600 mcg/mL, inter-assay imprecision of ≤13% CV (n = 13) and accuracy with <4% error from expected values (n = 20).

Conclusion

The TOF-MS is a versatile development platform that can be used to characterize and verify the molecular weight differences between the ECUL and RAVUL heavy chains. Routine laboratory testing for RAVUL was viable using an orbitrap-MS to quantitate using the mass of the intact light chain. These two platforms, combined, provide incomparable value in development of LDTs for the clinical laboratory.

Norm-based comparison of the quality-of-life impact of ravulizumab and eculizumab in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria

Aims

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare and life-threatening intravascular hematologic disorder with significant morbidity and premature mortality. Clinical trials (NCT02946463 and NCT03056040) comparing ravulizumab with eculizumab for PNH have supported the non-inferiority of the former and similar safety and tolerability. This secondary analysis compared PNH trial participants after 26 weeks on either treatment (n = 438) to a general-population sample (GenPop) (n = 15,386) and investigated response-shift effects.

Methods

Multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) investigated function and symptom scores on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 of people with PNH as compared to GenPop, after covariate adjustment. Risk-factor groups were created based on clinical indicators known to be associated with worse PNH outcomes, and separate MANCOVAs were computed for lower- and higher-risk-factor groups. Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses examined whether item response varied systematically (1) by treatment, (2) compared to GenPop, and (3) over time, the latter two suggesting and reflecting response-shift effects, respectively. DIF analyses examined 24 items from scales with at least two items. Recalibration response shift was operationalized as uniform DIF over time, reflecting the idea that, for a given group, the difficulty of endorsing an item changes over time, after adjusting for the total subscale score. Reprioritization response shift was operationalized as non-uniform DIF over time, i.e., the relative difficulty of endorsing an item over time changes across the total domain score.

Results

Across PNH risk-factor levels, people who had been on either treatment for 26 weeks reported better-than-expected functioning and lower symptom burden compared to GenPop. Ravulizumab generally showed larger effect sizes. Results were similar for lower and higher PNH risk factors, with slightly stronger effects in the former. DIF analyses revealed no treatment DIF, but did uncover group DIF (9 items with uniform DIF, and 11 with non-uniform) and DIF over time (7 items with uniform DIF, and 3 with non-uniform).

Conclusions

This study revealed that people with PNH on ravulizumab or eculizumab for 26 weeks reported QOL levels better than those of the general population. Significant effects of DIF by group and DIF over time support recalibration and reprioritization response-shift effects. These findings suggest that the treatments enabled adaptive changes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-021-02016-8.

Concept confirmation of the Treatment Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (TASQ) in rare paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria

Background

This study was conducted to evaluate content validity of the IntraVenous and SubCutaneous Treatment Administration Satisfaction Questionnaires (TASQ-IV and TASQ-SC), for use in a clinical trial population of participants with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) undergoing eculizumab treatment.

Methods

Participants underwent semi-structured combined brief introduction to disease history and full cognitive debriefing interviews to establish symptoms and key impacts of PNH and to explore the clarity and relevance of both sets of instructions (TASQ-IV and TASQ-SC). The clarity, relevance, response options, and recall period of the TASQ-IV items were also explored.

Results

Ten participants with PNH were recruited. Fatigue was the most commonly reported symptom (n = 7); the most commonly reported impact of PNH was on physical activity (n = 4). Nine participants indicated understanding and relevance of the TASQ-IV instructions; three participants suggested changes. Of the 20 TASQ-IV items, ≥ 15 were considered understandable, relevant and to have suitable response options (n ≥ 8). The TASQ-SC instructions were understood by all participants; seven participants indicated relevance. While a few participants suggested minor changes for the items, these reflected the one-off completion of the measure in an interview setting and were thus not considered sufficient to justify modification of the measure for clinical trial completion.

Conclusions

Most participants understood the TASQ-IV and TASQ-SC instructions (n = 9 and 10, respectively) and the TASQ-IV items were considered clear, relevant and to have suitable response options, demonstrating face and content validity of the instruments for the clinical trial setting.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-021-00319-9.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Ravulizumab in Adults with Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019

INTRODUCTION

Terminal complement amplification is hypothesized to be a key contributor to the clinical manifestations of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Ravulizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to complement protein C5 and inhibits terminal complement activation, is being evaluated as a treatment for COVID-19-related severe pneumonia, acute lung injury, and acute respiratory distress syndrome in an ongoing phase 3 randomized controlled trial (ALXN1210-COV-305). To address the overactivation of terminal complement in severe COVID-19 compared to the diseases in which ravulizumab is currently approved, a modified dosing regimen was adopted. This analysis evaluates preliminary pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data to confirm the modified dosing regimen.

METHODS

Weight-based ravulizumab doses were administered on days 1, 5, 10, and 15. Serum levels of ravulizumab and free C5 were measured before and after administration of ravulizumab and any time on day 22. Free C5 levels < 0.5 μg/mL indicate complete C5 inhibition. The pharmacokinetic target was defined as ravulizumab concentrations at the end of the dosing interval > 175 μg/mL, the concentration above which C5 is completely inhibited.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were included in this evaluation. At baseline, mean C5 concentration was 240 ± 67 μg/mL. In all patients and at all individual timepoints after the first dose was administered, ravulizumab concentrations remained > 175 μg/mL and free C5 concentrations remained < 0.5 μg/mL.

CONCLUSION

High levels of baseline C5 observed in patients with severe COVID-19 contribute to the growing body of evidence that suggests this disease is marked by amplification of terminal complement activation. Data from this preliminary pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of 22 patients with severe COVID-19 show that the modified ravulizumab dosing regimen achieved immediate and complete terminal complement inhibition, which can be sustained for up to 22 days. These data support the continued use of this dosage regimen in the ongoing phase 3 study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04369469.

The long-acting C5 inhibitor, ravulizumab, is efficacious and safe in pediatric patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome previously treated with eculizumab

BACKGROUND

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare, complement-mediated disease associated with poor outcomes if untreated. Ravulizumab, a long-acting C5 inhibitor developed through minimal, targeted modifications to eculizumab was recently approved for the treatment of aHUS. Here, we report outcomes from a pediatric patient cohort from the ravulizumab clinical trial (NCT03131219) who were switched from chronic eculizumab to ravulizumab treatment.

METHODS

Ten patients received a loading dose of ravulizumab on Day 1, followed by maintenance doses administered initially on Day 15, and then, every 4-8 weeks thereafter, depending on body weight. All patients completed the initial evaluation period of 26 weeks and entered the extension period.

RESULTS

No patients required dialysis at any point throughout the study. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate values remained stable during the trial: 99.8 mL/min/1.73m2 at baseline, 93.5 mL/min/1.73m2 at 26 weeks, and 104 mL/min/1.73m2 at 52 weeks. At last available follow-up, all patients were in the same chronic kidney disease stage as recorded at baseline. Hematologic variables (platelets, lactate dehydrogenase, and hemoglobin) also remained stable throughout the initial evaluation period and up to the last available follow-up. All patients experienced adverse events; the most common were upper respiratory tract infection (40%) and oropharyngeal pain (30%). There were no meningococcal infections reported, no deaths occurred, and no patients discontinued during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, treatment with ravulizumab in pediatric patients with aHUS who were previously treated with eculizumab resulted in stable kidney and hematologic parameters, with no unexpected safety concerns when administered every 4-8 weeks.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial identifiers: Trial ID: ALXN1210-aHUS-312 Clinical trials.gov : NCT03131219 EudraCT number: 2016-002499-29 Graphical abstract.

[A reference guide for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: recent updates and points of medical treatment]

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) causes clonal expansion of hematopoietic stem cells with abnormal GPI-anchor biosynthesis. The major pathological condition of PNH is that the erythrocytes lacking the complement regulatory factors CD55 and CD59, which are GPI-anchored proteins, lead to intravascular hemolysis through complement activation. Clonal expansion has been assumed to be involved in an immunological attack on hematopoietic stem cells, and the bone marrow failure associated therewith modifies the pathology to varying degrees. The introduction of eculizumab made complement control possible; however, the problems associated with it became apparent as the treatment progressed. Additionally, the PNH Reference Guide was significantly revised in 2016, partly because PNH was designated as a Japanese medical subsidy. With the revised edition of 2020, minor revisions have been added to reflect further advances in treatment and understanding of the disease, while mainly dealing with the clinical introduction of eculizumab derivative, ravulizumab, which uses recycling antibody technology. This review outlines the points of the 2020 revision, including the important points of the previous revision.

Efficacy and safety of the long-acting C5 inhibitor ravulizumab in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome triggered by pregnancy: a subgroup analysis

BACKGROUND

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) triggered by pregnancy is a rare disease caused by dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway that occurs in approximately 1 in 25,000 pregnancies. The 311 phase 3 trial (NCT02949128) showed that ravulizumab, a long-acting C5 inhibitor obtained through selective modifications to eculizumab, is efficacious in inhibiting complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) in patients with aHUS. In this analysis, we report outcomes in a subgroup of patients from the 311 study who developed TMA postpartum.

METHODS

This was a phase 3, multicenter trial evaluating efficacy and safety of ravulizumab in adults (≥18 years of age) with aHUS naïve to complement inhibitor treatment. The primary endpoint was complete TMA response (simultaneous platelet count normalization [≥150 × 109/L], lactate dehydrogenase normalization [≤246 U/L] and 25% improvement in serum creatinine) through the 183-day initial evaluation period. Additional efficacy endpoints included time to complete TMA response, hematologic normalization, and dialysis requirement status.

RESULTS

Eight patients presenting with TMA postpartum (median age of 37.7 [range; 22.1-45.2] years) were diagnosed with aHUS and received ≥1 dose of ravulizumab. Five patients (63%) were on dialysis at baseline. Complete TMA response was achieved in 7/8 patients (87.5%) in a median time of 31.5 days. Hematologic normalization was observed in all patients. All patients on dialysis at baseline discontinued dialysis within 21 days after treatment with ravulizumab. All patients showed continued improvements in the estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline to Day 183. Three possible treatment-related adverse events were observed in 2 patients (arthralgia and nasopharyngitis [both non-severe]; urinary tract infection). No deaths or meningococcal infections occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with ravulizumab provided immediate and complete C5 inhibition, resulting in rapid clinical and laboratory improvements and complete TMA response through 183 days in patients with aHUS triggered by pregnancy. The safety profile observed in this subset of patients analysed is consistent with the 311 study investigating ravulizumab in patients with aHUS naïve to complement treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial identifier: NCT02949128 .

Monitoring Ravulizumab effect on complement assays

Ravulizumab is a new C5 inhibitor therapeutic monoclonal antibody with a longer half-life than eculizumab. Monitoring complete complement blockade by eculizumab has allowed personalized therapy in specific settings. Similar action is expected with ravulizumab. Ravulizumab has 4 different amino acids from eculizumab, which allow greater affinity for the FcRn immunoglobulin receptor and change the affinity of the molecule for C5. Here we investigate if clinical lab tests traditionally used to monitor complement blockade for eculizumab are appropriate for monitoring complement blockade caused by ravulizumab. De-identified serum samples with known normal complement activity were spiked with increasing amounts of ravulizumab, from zero to 1000 μg/mL. Measurement of classical pathway function (CH50) and C5 function using a liposome method (Wako Diagnostics) showed >50% complement inhibition starting with 50 μg/mL of ravulizumab, but inhibition >95% of complement activity was not achieved, with residual measurements of 11% at 700 μg/mL. In contrast, measurement of alternative pathway function using an ELISA (AH50, Wieslab) showed alternative pathway function inhibition of 80% at 50 μg/mL of ravulizumab and > 95% at 200 μg/mL, which is consistent with expected therapeutic concentrations of ravulizumab >175 μg/mL. If replicated in patient sera, AH50 could be a suitable therapeutic monitoring tool.

[Antibody therapy for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria]

Treatment with eculizumab (Soliris^®), a humanized anti-C5 monoclonal antibody improves the quality of life of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), remarkably reduces hemolysis, improves symptoms associated with hemolysis, and prevents thrombosis. Because eculizumab therapy is not a curative treatment, it is necessary to continue infusion every two weeks, which has been an issue from the viewpoint of convenience. In recent years, an improved version of eculizumab, ravulizumab (Ultomiris^®), which relies on the technology of recycling antibodies has been developed and can be administered every 8 weeks. Crovalimab (SKY59), which can be administered subcutaneously every four weeks, is also under development, and therefore, the convenience for patients with PNH is improving. However, many issues still persist, and several new anti-complement drugs are currently under development. Hopefully, a better drug will be developed by thorough examination of what drug is best for the patient by considering not only its efficacy and safety but also its convenience.

Results from multinational phase 3 studies of ravulizumab (ALXN1210) versus eculizumab in adults with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: subgroup analysis of Japanese patients

Ravulizumab demonstrated noninferior efficacy and comparable safety to eculizumab in two open-label, phase 3 studies in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) who complement inhibitor-naive (Study 301) or were previously treated with eculizumab (Study 302). This subgroup analysis assessed ravulizumab's efficacy and safety in Japanese patients in Studies 301 and 302, who are known to have different clinicopathologic features from white patients. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to eculizumab every-two-weeks or weight-based dosing of ravulizumab every-eight-weeks for 26 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were transfusion avoidance and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) normalization in Study 301 and percentage change in LDH levels from baseline to day 183 in Study 302. Thirty-three Japanese patients (n = 18 ravulizumab; n = 15 eculizumab) enrolled in Study 301; 12 enrolled in Study 302 (n = 5 ravulizumab; n = 7 eculizumab). In the Study 301 ravulizumab group, 83.3% (15/18) of patients avoided transfusion; the adjusted prevalence of LDH normalization was 52.1%. In the Study 302 ravulizumab group, the least-squares-mean percentage change from baseline in LDH was 8.34%. No deaths or meningococcal infections occurred during the 6-month primary evaluation period in either study. In conclusion, ravulizumab's efficacy and safety were consistent in the Japanese and global patient populations with PNH in the phase 3 studies. Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT02946463; NCT03056040.

Repurposed immunomodulatory drugs for Covid-19 in pre-ICu patients - mulTi-Arm Therapeutic study in pre-ICu patients admitted with Covid-19 - Repurposed Drugs (TACTIC-R): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To determine if a specific immunomodulatory intervention reduces progression of COVID-19-related disease to organ failure or death, compared to standard of care (SoC).

TRIAL DESIGN

Randomised, parallel 3-arm (1:1:1 ratio), open-label, Phase IV platform trial of immunomodulatory therapies in patients with late stage 1 or stage 2 COVID-19-related disease, with a diagnosis based either on a positive assay or high suspicion of COVID-19 infection by clinical and/or radiological assessment.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged 18 and over, with a clinical picture strongly suggestive of COVID-19-related disease (with/without a positive COVID-19 test) AND a Risk count (as defined below) >3 OR ≥3 if risk count includes "Radiographic severity score >3". A risk count is calculated by the following features on admission (1 point for each): radiographic severity score >3, male gender, non-white ethnicity, diabetes, hypertension, neutrophils >8.0 x109/L, age >40 years and CRP >40 mg/L. Patients should be considered an appropriate subject for intervention with immunomodulatory therapies in the opinion of the investigator and be able to be maintained on venous thromboembolism prophylaxis during the inpatient dosing period, according to local guidelines. The complete inclusion and exclusion criteria as detailed in the additional file 1 should be fulfilled. Patients will be enrolled prior to the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, cardiac or renal support. Participants will be recruited across multiple centres including initially at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, University Hospital of Wales, Gloucestershire Royal Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust.

INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR

Each active comparator arm will be compared against standard of care (SoC). The immunomodulatory drugs were selected from a panel of licenced candidates by a drug evaluation committee, which considered potential efficacy, potential toxicity, scalability and novelty of each strategy. The initial active arms comprise baricitinib and ravulizumab. Baricitinib will be given 4 mg orally (once daily (OD)) on days 1-14 or until day of discharge. The dose will be reduced to 2 mg OD for patients aged > 75 years and those with an estimated Cockcroft Gault creatinine clearance of 30-60 ml/min. Ravulizumab will be administered intravenously once according to the licensed weight-based dosing regimen (see Additional file 1). Each active arm will be compared with standard of care alone. No comparisons will be made between active arms in this platform trial.

MAIN OUTCOMES

The primary outcome is the incidence (from baseline up to Day 14) of any one of the events (whichever comes first): death, invasive mechanical ventilation, extra corporeal membrane oxygenation, cardiovascular organ support (inotropes or balloon pump), or renal failure (estimated Cockcroft Gault creatinine clearance <15ml/min).

RANDOMISATION

Eligible patients will be randomised using a central web-based randomisation service (Sealed Envelope) in a 1:1:1 ratio, stratified by site to one of the treatment arms or SoC.

BLINDING (MASKING)

This is an open-label trial. Data analysis will not be blinded.

NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE)

There is no fixed sample size for this study. Serial interim analyses will be triggered by an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC), including analysis after 125 patients are recruited to each arm, 375 in total assuming 3 arms. Additional interim analyses are projected after 229 patients per arm, and potentially then after 469 per arm, but additional analyses may be triggered by the IDMC.

TRIAL STATUS

TACTIC-R Protocol version number 2.0 date May 20, 2020, recruitment began May 7, 2020 and the end trial will be the date 18 months after the last patient's last visit. The recruitment end date cannot yet be accurately predicted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered on EU Clinical Trials Register EudraCT Number: 2020-001354-22 Registered: 6 May 2020 It was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04390464 ) and on ISRCTN (ISRCTN11188345) FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.

Eculizumab and Beyond: The Past, Present, and Future of Complement Therapeutics

Dysregulation of the complement system underlies the pathophysiology of many diseases. Renewed interest in complement occurred with the recognition that its therapeutic inhibition was possible. Terminal complement blockade with the anti-C5 monoclonal antibody eculizumab significantly changed management and clinical outcomes of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, and served as a proof of concept for other complement-mediated diseases. Eculizumab is also approved for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and myasthenia gravis. Multiple new disease indications have been identified, and novel complement inhibitors are in various stages of development, with several currently in human trials. Beyond C5, these new drugs block proximal complement, pathway-specific targets, convertase activity, and anaphylatoxin function. Though monoclonal antibodies are still common, peptides, RNAi, and small molecule inhibitors provide the opportunity for different administration routes and schedules. Several challenges still exist or will soon present themselves, including mitigation of infection risk, effective monitoring strategies, and how to choose between therapeutics when more than one is available. In this review, we will describe the lessons learned from the "eculizumab era," present many of the novel therapeutics currently or soon to be in trials, and highlight some of the challenges that will require attention as the field progresses.