Subcutaneous Infliximab [CT-P13], a True Biologic 2.0. Real Clinical Practice Multicentre Study

Comparative efficacy of subcutaneous infliximab switching in remission and non-remission patients with inflammatory bowel disease after intravenous maintenance: 1-year outcome from a multicentre cohort study

Background

Elective switching from intravenous (IV) to subcutaneous (SC) infliximab (IFX) has shown efficacy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, long-term outcomes for patients not in remission remain unclear.

Objectives

We evaluated the effectiveness of SC IFX switching in both remission and non-remission patients.

Design

This study was a retrospective multicentre study conducted across five tertiary hospitals in Korea.

Methods

Patients with IBD who switched to SC IFX between January 2021 and January 2023 were included. Clinical remission was defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index of <150 or a partial Mayo score of <2. Biochemical remission was defined as faecal calprotectin of <250 µg/g and C-reactive protein of <0.5 mg/dL. We investigated the treatment persistence rate of SC IFX and trends in pharmacokinetics, clinical indices and biomarkers over 1 year of follow-up, analysing the data based on the baseline remission state.

Results

Among 127 patients included, 90 (70.9%) were in clinical remission, and 37 (29.1%) were not at the time of switching. The one-year treatment persistence rate was 92.1%, with no significant difference between the clinical remission and non-remission groups (p = 0.139). Persistence was also unaffected by baseline biochemical remission status. IFX pharmacokinetics and biomarkers improved significantly in both clinical groups over 12 months (p < 0.005). Disease activity indices remained stable in the remission group and decreased in the non-remission group after switching. Previous biologics exposure was the only significant predictor of treatment persistence (hazard ratio, 5.634; 95% confidence interval, 1.357-23.384; p = 0.017). Adverse events related to SC IFX occurred in 15.7% of patients. The optimal SC IFX cutoff levels associated with clinical and biochemical remission were 11 and 17 μg/mL, respectively.

Conclusion

Switching from IV to SC IFX during maintenance therapy demonstrated high treatment persistence and safety, irrespective of clinical and biochemical remission status.

Switching to Subcutaneous Infliximab Maintenance Therapy Is Effective in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest that subcutaneous infliximab is effective and safe for treating patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Real-world studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm the efficacy of subcutaneous treatment.

AIMS

The aim was to assess real-world treatment persistence, clinical outcomes, infliximab concentrations, and treatment safety after switching from intravenous to subcutaneous infliximab treatment with patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

This retrospective register-based study included patients with inflammatory bowel disease who were in clinical remission and switched from intravenous infliximab maintenance therapy to subcutaneous infliximab in two tertiary centers.

RESULTS

A total of 274 patients (104 Crohn's disease and 170 ulcerative colitis) were included. After the switch, the treatment persistence at 12 months was 94.8% in patients with Crohn's disease and 88.8% in patients with ulcerative colitis. Only 11.3% (n = 31) of the patients discontinued the treatment during 79-week median follow-up. Compared to the baseline, no change occurred in clinical disease activity at the time points of 3, 6, and 12 months, based on the Harvey-Bradshaw Index or partial Mayo Score (p = 0.792 and p = 0.426, respectively). Infliximab median concentrations were higher (p < 0.0001) during subcutaneous treatment (16.75 µg/ml) compared to the intravenous treatment median trough levels before the switch (6.71 µg/ml). In total, 15.0% (n = 41) of the patients reported adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Switching to subcutaneous infliximab maintenance therapy was associated with high treatment persistence, a stable disease course, increased infliximab concentrations, and an acceptable safety profile.

Switching from intravenous to subcutaneous infliximab is safe and feasible in patients with perianal Crohn's disease

Background and objectives

We assessed the evolution of perianal lesions after switching intravenous (IV) to subcutaneous (SC) infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease (CD).

Design

Subgroup analysis of REMSWITCH studies.

Methods

We described the clinical and MRI outcomes of patients with a prior or current CD perianal lesions after the switch.

Results

In REMSWITCH, 40 CD patients had a prior history of perianal lesions. No patient experienced a new perianal lesion (median follow-up = 18 months). Among the three patients (3/40, 7.5%) with clinically active perianal lesions at baseline, two patients had no more perianal lesions at month 18 while the last patient experienced lesions worsening. Another one with active perianal lesions on MRI but no symptom at baseline did not have any relapse within 18 months. Only one patient (1/40, 2.5%) had a perianal relapse (at month 25) with remission recapture after SC infliximab intensification.

Conclusion

Switching from IV to SC infliximab in CD with perianal lesions is safe and feasible.

Subcutaneous Infliximab Cutoff Points in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Data From the ENEIDA Registry

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Switching from intravenous infliximab (IV-IFX) to subcutaneous biosimilar infliximab (SC-IFX) has been shown to safely maintain clinical remission and increase drug levels in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes after switching from IV-IFX to SC-IFX, including the drug concentration thresholds for maintaining remission and other predictors for loss of response after the switch.

METHODS

This multicenter observational study involved CD and UC patients who were in clinical remission for at least 24 weeks and were scheduled to switch from IV-IFX to SC-IFX.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty patients were included (74 UC [34%] and 146 CD [66%]). IV-IFX was administered for 52.5 months (range 25-89). Before switch, 106 (49%) patients were receiving intensified IV-IFX. While SC-IFX levels significantly increased following the switch from IV-IFX to SC-IFX, clinical parameters, C-reactive protein, and fecal calprotectin remained unchanged during follow-up. SC-IFX levels were significantly higher in patients receiving the standard IV-IFX dose than in those receiving the intensified dose. Immunomodulatory therapy at baseline and perianal disease had no effect on IFX trough levels, whereas higher body mass index was associated with increased levels. The suggested optimal SC-IFX cutoff concentration for clinical and biochemical remissions based on receiver operating characteristic analysis was 12.2 μg/mL (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.62) at Week 12 and 13.2 μg/mL (AUC: 0.57) at Week 52. Drug persistence was 92% at Week 52, with a good safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from IV-IFX to SC-IFX safely maintains long-term remission in patients with CD and UC. In maintenance, the optimal cutoff point associated with remission was 12-13 μg/mL.

Systematic review with meta-analysis of the effectiveness of subcutaneous biologics versus intravenous biologics in inflammatory bowel diseases

BACKGROUND

Biologic therapies are commonly used for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Multiple biologic medicines can now be given both intravenously and subcutaneously. The different administration routes present provide different advantages regarding dose escalation, healthcare resource utilisation, pharmacokinetics, convenience and safety. Comparator effectiveness studies between intravenous and subcutaneous administration are lacking.

AIM

Our primary outcome was to compare the effectiveness between intravenous and subcutaneous biologics in rates of clinical remission.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to include all relevant articles from MEDLINE ( Ovid ), EMBASE , PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1 January 2003 to 28 January 2024. Studies that compared intravenous and subcutaneous administration of the same biologic therapy in IBD patients and reported effectiveness outcomes were included. This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023442675).

RESULTS

Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Nine vedolizumab cohort studies were meta-analysed for clinical remission and no difference was found in clinical remission rates between intravenous and subcutaneous administration (relative risk = 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.88, 1.11). Six infliximab cohort studies were meta-analysed for clinical remission and no difference was found in clinical remission rates between intravenous and subcutaneous administration (relative risk = 0.91; 95% confidence interval: 0.77, 1.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings in the first meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of intravenous and subcutaneous biologic therapies in IBD suggest there is no difference in the effectiveness between these two administration routes. However, further high-quality studies, particularly head-to-head studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Subcutaneous versus intravenous infliximab therapy - a real-world study: toward higher drug concentrations

BACKGROUND

Recently, a formula of subcutaneous infliximab (SC-IFX) has been approved for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), demonstrating a better pharmacokinetic and immunogenic profiles, compared to intravenous infliximab (IV-IFX), with similar efficacy and safety.

AIM

The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical, biochemical, and pharmacological outcomes of IBD patients in clinical remission, who switched from IV-IFX to SC-IFX, with a follow-up period of 6 months.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study, including IBD patients in clinical remission, previously medicated with IV-IFX, who switched to SC-IFX 120 mg every other week. Biochemical parameters were evaluated before the switch and 6 months after, namely infliximab serum concentrations, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and fecal calprotectin.

RESULTS

Included 41 patients in clinical remission, 32 with Crohn's disease (78.0%) and 9 with ulcerative colitis (22.0%). All patients maintained clinical remission during the 6 months after the switch, with a treatment persistence rate of 100%, and no patients requiring corticosteroid therapy, switching back to IV-IFX, or IBD-related hospitalization. The mean infliximab serum concentrations were significantly higher after 6 months of SC-IFX (17.3 ± 6.6 vs. 9.1 ± 5.5 µg/ml, P  < 0.001). However, there were no differences between values of ESR, CRP, and fecal calprotectin, before and after the switch ( P  = 0.791, P  = 0.246, and P  = 0.639). Additionally, none of the patients developed antibodies to infliximab.

CONCLUSION

Switching from IV-IFX to SC-IFX in IBD patients in clinical remission is effective and leads to higher infliximab serum concentrations, regardless of the combination with immunomodulatory therapy.

Effectiveness of switching to subcutaneous infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease patients with inadequate biochemical response during intravenous administration

Infliximab (IFX) has transformed the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). While intravenous (IV) IFX has been effective, a subcutaneous (SC) formulation offers advantages in convenience and cost. However, there is lack of evidence regarding the transition from IV to SC-IFX, especially for patients with inadequate responses. This study investigates the effectiveness of switching from IV to SC-IFX in patients with inadequate responses during IV maintenance therapy. A retrospective study enrolled IBD patients who transitioned to SC-IFX after demonstrating inadequate responses during IV maintenance therapy. The study collected data of demographics of patients and dose and therapies administered prior to the IV-IFX. Primary outcomes included improvements in C-reactive protein (CRP) or fecal calprotectin (FC) levels. This study evaluated the trough levels and its differences between pre- and post-switching. Among 44 patients included, 10 exhibited CRP elevation before the switch, with 6 showing normalization post-switch. Similarly, 42 patients had elevated FC levels pre-switch, with 26 experiencing reductions post-switch. Trough levels increased after the switch. However, there were no significant differences between responders and non-responders. This study is the first study to investigate the transition therapy of IV to SC-IFX in patients with inadequate response. This suggests that SC-IFX could be a viable alternative in the management of IBD. However, further research is necessary to evaluate its efficacy in a larger population of patients who exhibit inadequate responses during IV-IFX maintenance therapy.

Subcutaneous Infliximab (CT-P13 SC) as Maintenance Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Two Randomized Phase 3 Trials (LIBERTY)

BACKGROUND & AIMS

CT-P13 subcutaneous (SC), an SC formulation of the intravenous (IV) infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 IV, creates a unique exposure profile. The LIBERTY studies aimed to demonstrate superiority of CT-P13 SC vs placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

Two randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies were conducted in patients with moderately to severely active CD or UC and inadequate response or intolerance to corticosteroids and immunomodulators. All patients received open-label CT-P13 IV 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, and 6. At week 10, clinical responders were randomized (2:1) to CT-P13 SC 120 mg or placebo every 2 weeks until week 54 (maintenance phase) using prefilled syringes. (Co-) primary end points were clinical remission and endoscopic response (CD) and clinical remission (UC) at week 54 (all-randomized population).

RESULTS

Overall, 396 patients with CD and 548 patients with UC received induction treatment. At week 54 in the CD study, statistically significant higher proportions of CT-P13 SC-treated patients vs placebo-treated patients achieved clinical remission (62.3% vs 32.1%; P < .0001) and endoscopic response (51.1% vs 17.9%; P < .0001). In the UC study, clinical remission rates at week 54 were statistically significantly higher with CT-P13 SC vs placebo (43.2% vs 20.8%; P < .0001). Achievement of key secondary end points was significantly higher with CT-P13 SC vs placebo across both studies. CT-P13 SC was well tolerated, with no new safety signals identified.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-P13 SC was more effective than placebo as maintenance therapy and was well tolerated in patients with moderately to severely active CD or UC who responded to CT-P13 IV induction.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov, Numbers: NCT03945019 (CD) and NCT04205643 (UC).

Intravenous Versus Subcutaneous Infliximab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous [SC] infliximab may provide multiple benefits over intravenous [IV] formulations. However, studies for efficacy and safety in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] have been constrained by small sizes that limit the interpretation of outcomes, particularly for subgroups potentially at high risk of disease relapse.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis up to January 2023, to evaluate the change in clinical remission after transitioning from IV to SC infliximab in patients with IBD in clinical remission. The primary outcome was measured using the relative risk for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 15 studies of patients established ≥ 3 months on IV infliximab, consisting of 1371 patients and 840 patient-years of follow-up. There was no loss of clinical remission in the IBD cohort overall, Crohn's disease [CD], or perianal CD [p = 0.55 and p = 0.11 at 9-12 months, and p = 0.50 at 6 months, respectively]. Neither prior IV dose [≤ 10 mg/kg 6-weekly] [p = 0.48] nor IBD disease subtype was associated with an increased clinical relapse rate at 6 months (p = 0.48 and p = 0.45 [UC vs CD], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Changing patients established on IV infliximab to an SC formulation is associated with a high ongoing clinical remission and a low adverse event rate. Furthermore, there are no signals for adverse outcomes among different IBD disease subtypes, nor in those on escalated IV infliximab dosing schedules up to 10 mg/kg 6-weekly. These data should provide patients and clinicians alike with confidence in SC infliximab use in IBD.

Switching from Dose-Intensified intravenous to SubCutaneoUS infliximab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (DISCUS-IBD): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

A substantial proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on intravenous infliximab require dose intensification. Accessing additional intravenous infliximab is labour-intensive and expensive, depending on insurance and pharmaceutical reimbursement. Observational data suggest that subcutaneous infliximab may offer a convenient and safe alternative to maintain disease remission in patients requiring dose-intensified infliximab. A prospective, controlled trial is required to confirm that subcutaneous infliximab is as effective as dose-intensified intravenous infliximab, to identify predictors of disease flare and to establish the role of subcutaneous infliximab therapeutic drug monitoring.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The DISCUS-IBD trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label non-inferiority study comparing the rate of disease flares in participants randomised to continue dose-intensified intravenous infliximab to those switched to subcutaneous infliximab after 48 weeks. Participants are adult patients with IBD in sustained corticosteroid-free remission on any regimen of dose-intensified infliximab up to a maximum of 10 mg/kg 4-weekly intravenously. Participants allocated to intravenous infliximab will continue infliximab at the same dose-intensified regimen they were receiving at study enrolment. Subcutaneous infliximab dosing will be stratified by prior intravenous infliximab dosing. Clinical (Harvey-Bradshaw Index, partial Mayo score), biochemical (C reactive protein, faecal calprotectin), pharmacokinetic (drug-level±antidrug antibodies) and qualitative data are collected 12-weekly until study conclusion at week 48. 13 sites across Australia will participate in recruitment to reach a calculated sample size of 120 participants.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Multisite ethics approval was obtained from the Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) at The Alfred Hospital under a National Mutual Acceptance (NMA) agreement (HREC/90559/Alfred-2022; Local Reference: Project 618/22, version 1.6, 2 March 2023). Findings will be reported at national and international gastroenterology meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. DISCUS-IBD was prospectively registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) prior to commencing recruitment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12622001458729.

Switching from intravenous to subcutaneous infliximab maintenance therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: Post hoc longitudinal analysis of a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic non-inferiority of subcutaneous (SC) to intravenous (IV) CT-P13 maintenance therapy was demonstrated in a randomized trial (NCT02883452). This post hoc analysis evaluated longitudinal clinical outcomes with the two infliximab treatment strategies.

METHODS

Patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis received CT‑P13 IV loading doses (5 mg/kg; Week [W] 0 and W2) before randomization (1:1) to receive CT-P13 SC (body weight-based dosing every 2 weeks [Q2W]; W6-54; 'SC maintenance group') or CT‑P13 IV (5 mg/kg Q8W; W6-22) then CT-P13 SC (Q2W; W30-54; 'IV-to-SC switch group'). Paired W30/W54 patient-level data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-three (IV-to-SC switch) and fifty-nine (SC maintenance) patients were analyzed. Median trough serum CT-P13 concentrations were significantly higher at W54 versus W30 in the IV-to-SC switch group (20.4 versus 2.3 µg/mL; p < 0.00001), while remaining consistent in the SC maintenance group. Statistically significant improvements in pharmacokinetics, efficacy, fecal calprotectin levels, and quality of life were seen following switch to SC administration at W30 in the IV-to-SC switch group; safety findings were similar pre- and post-switch.

CONCLUSION

Formulation switching from IV to SC infliximab maintenance therapy was well tolerated and may provide additional clinical improvements. Findings require confirmation in larger prospective studies.

Clinical use of biologics for Crohn's disease in adults: lessons learned from real-world studies

INTRODUCTION

The therapeutic armamentarium for managing Crohn's disease (CD) has expanded significantly in recent decades. Several biologics with three different mechanisms of action [anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, anti-integrin α4β7, and anti-IL 12/23] are currently available to manage CD.

AREA COVERED

This narrative review aims to summarize the most significant efficacy and safety data on the use of infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) for the treatment of CD obtained from studies conducted in the real world (RW), compared to the results of randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

EXPERT OPINION

RW studies reported that biologic agents included in this analysis have higher remission rates and lower adverse event rates than findings from RCTs for treating patients with CD. All biological agents have proven effective and safe in RW studies, even when using biosimilars or switching to subcutaneous administration of the molecules for which they are available. Finally, anti-TNF-α agents, particularly IFX, have a higher rate of adverse events (AEs) than VDZ and UST. Therefore, patients at higher risk of AEs may benefit from other biologics than anti-TNF-α. However, further long-term RW studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Therapeutic potential of infliximab for pruritus in mice model of cholestasis induced by bile duct ligation: Possible involvement of IL-31

BACKGROUND

Cholestatic pruritus is a distressful sensation that can cause a massive desire of scratching skin. Despite maximum medication therapy, some patients still experience pruritus. In this study, we evaluated the effect of infliximab on cholestatic pruritus induced in mice by bile duct ligation.

METHODS

Twenty-four balb/c mice were randomly assigned to three groups; sham, control, and treatment. The bile duct ligation procedure was performed on mice in the control and treatment groups. After six days, mice in the treatment group received subcutaneous administration of infliximab, and the next day all mice were subjected to the scratching behavior test. Skin, dorsal root ganglia (DRG), and blood samples of mice were collected and evaluated by histopathological, molecular, and biochemical tests.

RESULTS

The scratching behavior has significantly decreased in mice with cholestasis after the administration of infliximab. The levels of TNFα, TNFR1, TNFR2, NF-κB, and IL-31were higher in control mice compared to sham. In addition, expression levels of TNFR1, NF-κB, and IL-31 were decreased in the treatment group compared to the controls in skin and DRG, while TNFR2 levels were decreased only in DRG.

CONCLUSION

Infliximab can block TNFα interaction with receptors and inhibit further inflammatory response. Also, our results suggested that infliximab can suppress IL-31 expression indirectly, which is a well-known cytokine in pruritus pathophysiology Infliximab can be a potential therapeutic approach in resistant pruritus in cholestatic disorders.

Subcutaneous Infliximab in Refractory Crohn's Disease Patients: A Possible Biobetter?

Background

A subcutaneous formulation of infliximab (IFX-SC) approved to treat patients with inflammatory bowel disease may offer improved efficacy versus intravenous infliximab.

Methods

Patients with refractory Crohn's disease (CD, n = 32) previously treated unsuccessfully with at least 2 biologics were treated with IFX-SC and followed from baseline at Week 0 (W0) to Week 30 (W30). The study's primary endpoint was the treatment's persistence at W30, while secondary goals included the analysis of serum infliximab trough levels (TL IFX), dynamics of anti-IFX antibodies (ATIs), and clinical, serum and fecal markers of CD activity during IFX-SC treatment.

Results

Midterm treatment persistence with the continuation of treatment after W30 was 53%. TL IFX median values showed rapid, significant upward dynamics and exceeded 15.5 μg/mL at W30, whereas median ATI levels significantly declined. Among ATI-negative patients at W0 (n = 15), only one showed IFX immunogenicity with newly developed ATIs at W30. Among ATI-positive patients at W0, ATI seroconversion from ATI-positive to ATI-negative status was observed in 10 of 17 patients (58.8%). Patients who had continued IFX-SC treatment at W30 showed significant decreases in C-reactive protein (P = .0341), fecal calprotectin (P = .0002), and Harvey-Bradshaw index (P = .0029) since W0.

Conclusions

Patients with refractory CD previously treated with at least 2 biologics exhibited clinically relevant improvement with IFX-SC, which showed less immunogenic potential than IFX-IV and highly stable TL IFX.

Editorial: Novel Therapeutic Approaches in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) encompass ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), both of which are inflammatory ailments affecting the gastrointestinal tract [...].

Real-world experience with subcutaneous infliximab: broadening treatment strategies for inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

The first subcutaneous (SC) formulation of infliximab (IFX), CT‑P13 SC, has been approved in Europe and Australia, including for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

AREAS COVERED

We provide a comprehensive overview of available clinical trial and real-world data for IFX SC treatment of IBD, focusing on the potential benefits of switching from IFX intravenous (IV) to IFX SC. We evaluate emerging evidence for IFX SC treatment for difficult-to-treat IBD, use as monotherapy, and suitability for patients receiving escalated IFX IV doses. Therapeutic drug monitoring approaches and patient and healthcare system perspectives on IFX SC are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

IFX SC represents a significant treatment innovation in the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor class after approximately 20 years of IFX IV availability. Evidence suggests that IFX SC is well tolerated and is associated with high patient acceptance and satisfaction. In addition, effectiveness is maintained in patients with stable disease following switch from IFX IV. Switching may be advisable, given the clinical benefits of IFX SC and its potential to improve healthcare service capacity. There are several areas requiring further research, including the role of IFX SC in difficult-to-treat and refractory disease, and the feasibility of IFX SC monotherapy.