Evaluation of Automatic Segmentation of Thalamic Nuclei through Clinical Effects Using Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Leads: A Technical Note

Evaluation of the Rotational Stability of Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Leads: A Case Series and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The rotational stability of directional deep brain stimulation leads is a major prerequisite for sustained clinical effects. Data on directional lead stability are limited and controversial.

METHODS

 We aimed to evaluate the long-term rotational stability of directional leads and define confounding factors in our own population and the current literature. We retrospectively evaluated the orientation of directional leads in patients with available postoperative computed tomography (CT; T1; day of surgery) and an additional postoperative image (T2; CT or rotational fluoroscopy) performed more than 7 days after the initial scan. The potential impact of intracranial air was assessed. We also reviewed the literature to define factors impacting stability.

RESULTS

 Thirty-six leads were evaluated. The mean follow-up between T1 and T2 was 413.3 (7-1,171) days. The difference in rotation between T1 and T2 was 2.444 ± 2.554 degrees (range: 0-9.0 degrees). The volume of intracranial air did not impact the rotation. The literature search identified one factor impacting the stability of directional leads, which is the amount of twist applied at implantation.

CONCLUSION

 Directional leads for deep brain stimulation show stable long-term orientation after implantation. Based on our literature review, large amounts of twist during implantation can lead to delayed rotation and should thus be avoided.

Feasibility of Augmented Reality for Pediatric Giant Supratentorial Tumors: A Report of Three Cases

Giant supratentorial brain tumors (GSBTs) in children are uncommon and extremely challenging entities unique to pediatric neurosurgery. Factors such as young patient age, need for urgent intervention, intraoperative blood loss, and ongoing raised intracranial pressure symptoms are examples of difficulties faced. Recently, there has been a growing body of literature on augmented reality (AR) in adult neurosurgery. In contrast, the use of AR in pediatric neurosurgery is comparatively less. Nonetheless, we postulate that AR systems will be helpful for understanding spatial relationships of complex GSBT anatomy for preoperative planning in a timely fashion. This study describes our experience in trialing AR as a potential tool for three cases of pediatric GSBTs. Overall, the AR platform offers our neurosurgical team excellent visuospatial insights for preoperative decision-making. However, we observe that substantial time is required to set up the AR system prior to each clinical case discussion by the neurosurgical team. In congruency with existing literature, our preliminary results report that there are still obstacles that need to be addressed before the technology can be seamlessly implemented into the clinical workflow for these time-sensitive childhood brain tumors. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the potential use of AR for complex pediatric GSBT cases.

The Therapeutic Potential of Non-Invasive and Invasive Cerebellar Stimulation Techniques in Hereditary Ataxias

The degenerative ataxias comprise a heterogeneous group of inherited and acquired disorders that are characterized by a progressive cerebellar syndrome, frequently in combination with one or more extracerebellar signs. Specific disease-modifying interventions are currently not available for many of these rare conditions, which underscores the necessity of finding effective symptomatic therapies. During the past five to ten years, an increasing number of randomized controlled trials have been conducted examining the potential of different non-invasive brain stimulation techniques to induce symptomatic improvement. In addition, a few smaller studies have explored deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the dentate nucleus as an invasive means to directly modulate cerebellar output, thereby aiming to alleviate ataxia severity. In this paper, we comprehensively review the clinical and neurophysiological effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and dentate nucleus DBS in patients with hereditary ataxias, as well as the presumed underlying mechanisms at the cellular and network level and perspectives for future research.

Deep brain stimulation of the ventrointermediate nucleus of the thalamus to treat essential tremor improves motor sequence learning

The network of brain structures engaged in motor sequence learning comprises the same structures as those involved in tremor, including basal ganglia, cerebellum, thalamus, and motor cortex. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventrointermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM) reduces tremor, but the effects on motor sequence learning are unknown. We investigated whether VIM stimulation has an impact on motor sequence learning and hypothesized that stimulation effects depend on the laterality of electrode location. Twenty patients (age: 38-81 years; 12 female) with VIM electrodes implanted to treat essential tremor (ET) successfully performed a serial reaction time task, varying whether the stimuli followed a repeating pattern or were selected at random, during which VIM-DBS was either on or off. Analyses of variance were applied to evaluate motor sequence learning performance according to reaction times (RTs) and accuracy. An interaction was observed between whether the sequence was repeated or random and whether VIM-DBS was on or off (F[1,18] = 7.89, p = .012). Motor sequence learning, reflected by reduced RTs for repeated sequences, was greater with DBS on than off (T[19] = 2.34, p = .031). Stimulation location correlated with the degree of motor learning, with greater motor learning when stimulation targeted the lateral VIM (n = 23, ρ = 0.46; p = .027). These results demonstrate the beneficial effects of VIM-DBS on motor sequence learning in ET patients, particularly with lateral VIM electrode location, and provide evidence for a role for the VIM in motor sequence learning.

Intraoperative integration of multimodal imaging to improve neuronavigation: a technical note

BACKGROUND

Brain shift may cause significant error in neuronavigation leading the surgeon to possible mistakes. Intraoperative MRI is the most reliable technique in brain tumor surgery. Unfortunately, it is highly expensive and time consuming and, at the moment, it is available only in few neurosurgical centers.

METHODS

In this case series the surgical workflow for brain tumor surgery is described where neuronavigation of pre-operative MRI, intraoperative CT scan and US as well as rigid and elastic image fusion between preoperative MRI and intraoperative US and CT, respectively, was applied to four brain tumor patients in order to compensate for surgical induced brain shift by using a commercially available software (Elements Image Fusion 4.0 with Virtual iMRI Cranial; Brainlab AG).

RESULTS

Three exemplificative cases demonstrated successful integration of different components of the described intraoperative surgical workflow. The data indicates that intraoperative navigation update is feasible by applying intraoperative 3D US and CT scanning as well as rigid and elastic image fusion applied depending on the degree of observed brain shift.

CONCLUSIONS

Integration of multiple intraoperative imaging techniques combined with rigid and elastic image fusion of preoperative MRI may reduce the risk of incorrect neuronavigation during brain tumor resection. Further studies are needed to confirm the present findings in a larger population.

Surgical Strategy for Directional Deep Brain Stimulation

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment for drug-resistant involuntary movements. However, the conventional quadripole cylindrical lead creates electrical fields in all directions, and the resulting spread to adjacent eloquent structures may induce unintended effects. Novel directional leads have therefore been designed to allow directional stimulation (DS). Directional leads have the advantage of widening the therapeutic window (TW), compensating for slight misplacement of the lead and requiring less electrical power to provide the same effect as a cylindrical lead. Conversely, the increase in the number of contacts from four to eight and the addition of directional elements has made stimulation programming more complex. For these reasons, new treatment strategies are required to allow effective directional DBS. During lead implantation, the directional segment should be placed in a "sweet spot," and the orientation of the directional segment is important for programming. Trial-and-error testing of a large number of contacts is unnecessary, and efficient and systematic execution of the programmed procedure is desirable. Recent improvements in imaging technologies have enabled image-guided programming. In the future, optimal stimulations are expected to be programmed by directional recording of local field potentials.