Fenofibrate Augments the Sensitivity of Drug-Resistant Prostate Cancer Cells to Docetaxel

Oxidative stress in peroxisomes induced by androgen receptor inhibition through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor promotes enzalutamide resistance in prostate cancer

Androgen receptor (AR)-targeting therapy induces oxidative stress in prostate cancer. However, the mechanism of oxidative stress induction by AR-targeting therapy remains unclear. This study investigated the mechanism of oxidative stress induction by AR-targeting therapy, with the aim to develop novel therapeutics targeting oxidative stress induced by AR-targeting therapy. Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) was examined by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry analysis. The effects of silencing gene expression and small molecule inhibitors on gene expression and cytotoxic effects were examined by quantitative real-time PCR and cell proliferation assay. ROS induced by androgen depletion co-localized with peroxisomes in prostate cancer cells. Among peroxisome-related genes, PPARA was commonly induced by AR inhibition and involved in ROS production via PKC signaling. Inhibition of PPARα by specific siRNA and a small molecule inhibitor suppressed cell proliferation and increased cellular sensitivity to the antiandrogen enzalutamide in prostate cancer cells. This study revealed a novel pathway by which AR inhibition induced intracellular ROS mainly in peroxisomes through PPARα activation in prostate cancer. This pathway is a promising target for the development of novel therapeutics for prostate cancer in combination with AR-targeting therapy such as antiandrogen enzalutamide.

Ritonavir reverses resistance to docetaxel and cabazitaxel in prostate cancer cells with acquired resistance to docetaxel

Aim: Docetaxel is a microtubule-stabilizing drug used for the treatment of several cancers, including prostate cancer. Resistance to docetaxel can either occur through intrinsic resistance or develop under therapeutic pressure, i.e., acquired resistance. A possible explanation for the occurrence of acquired resistance to docetaxel is increased drug efflux via P-glycoprotein (P-gp) drug transporters. Methods: We have generated docetaxel-resistant cell lines DU-145DOC10 and 22Rv1DOC8 by exposing parental cell lines DU-145DOC and 22Rv1 to increasing levels of docetaxel. Gene expression levels between DU-145DOC10 and 22Rv1DOC8 were compared with those of their respective originator cell lines. Both parental and resistant cell lines were treated with the taxane drugs docetaxel and cabazitaxel in combination with the P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitor ritonavir and the P-gp inhibitor elacridar. Results: In the docetaxel-resistant cell lines DU-145DOC10 and 22Rv1DOC8, the ABCB1 (P-gp) gene was highly up-regulated. Expression of the P-gp protein was also significantly increased in the docetaxel-resistant cell lines in a Western blotting assay. The addition of ritonavir to docetaxel resulted in a return of the sensitivity to docetaxel in the DU-145DOC10 and 22Rv1DOC8 to a level similar to the sensitivity in the originator cells. We found that these docetaxel-resistant cell lines could also be re-sensitized to cabazitaxel in a similar manner. In a Caco-2 P-gp transporter assay, functional inhibition of P-gp-mediated transport of docetaxel with ritonavir was demonstrated. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that ritonavir restores sensitivity to both docetaxel and cabazitaxel in docetaxel-resistant cell lines, most likely by inhibiting P-gp-mediated drug efflux.

Targeting lipid biosynthesis on the basis of conventional treatments for clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A promising therapeutic approach

A variety of cancer cells exhibit dysregulated lipid metabolism, characterized by excessive intracellular lipid accumulation, and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most typical disease with these characteristics. As the most common malignancy of all renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), ccRCC is typically characterized by a large accumulation of lipids and glycogen in the cytoplasm and a nucleus that is squeezed by the accumulated lipid droplets and localized to the marginal areas within the cytoplasm. This lipid accumulation has been found to be critically involved in the maintenance of malignant features observed in various cancers. Firstly, it maintains the persistent proliferative and metastasis properties of cancer cells. Secondly, it acts as a buffer against lipid peroxidation, preventing lipid peroxidation-induced ferroptosis. Moreover, lipids can diminish the sensitivity of cancer cells to radiotherapy. As ccRCC is a type of cancer with high lipid synthesis, targeting lipid synthesis-related genes in cancer cells may be a promising therapeutic modality for single treatment or in combination with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. This may revolutionize the choice of treatment modality for ccRCC patients. In this review, we concentrate on the current status and progress of research on lipid biosynthesis in ccRCC and the potential applications of targeting lipid synthesis to treat ccRCC. At last, we propose perspective and future research directions for targeting inhibition of lipid biosynthesis in combination with conventional therapeutic approaches for the treatment of ccRCC, which will help to evolve the therapeutic model.

Targeting DGAT1 inhibits prostate cancer cells growth by inducing autophagy flux blockage via oxidative stress

Impaired macroautophagy/autophagy flux has been implicated in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). However, the mechanism underlying autophagy dysregulation in PCa remains unknown. In the current study, we investigated the role of diacylglycerol acyltransferases 1 (DGAT1) and its potential effects on cellular energy homeostasis and autophagy flux in PCa. The results of immunohistochemical staining suggested that DGAT1 expression was positively corrected with tumor stage and node metastasis, indicating DGAT1 is an important factor involved in the development and progression of PCa. Furthermore, targeting DGAT1 remarkably inhibited cell proliferation in vitro and suppressed PCa growth in xenograft models by triggering severe oxidative stress and subsequently autophagy flux blockage. Mechanically, DGAT1 promoted PCa progression by maintaining cellular energy homeostasis, preserving mitochondrial function, protecting against reactive oxygen species, and subsequently promoting autophagy flux via regulating lipid droplet formation. Moreover, we found that fenofibrate exhibits as an upstream regulator of DGAT1. Fenofibrate performed its anti-PCa effect involved the aforementioned mechanisms, and partially dependent on the regulation of DGAT1. Collectively. These findings indicate that DGAT1 regulates PCa lipid droplets formation and is essential for PCa progression. Targeting DGAT1 might be a promising method to control the development and progression of PCa. Schematic representation of DGAT1 affects autophagy flux by regulating lipid homeostasis and maintaining mitochondrial function in prostate cancer (PCa). PCa is characterized up-regulation of DGAT1, leading to the translocation of free fatty acids into lipid droplets, thereby preventing PCa cell from lipotoxicity. Inhibition of DGAT1 suppresses growth of PCa by inducing oxidative stress and subsequently autophagy flux blockage. Further, the current results revealed that fenofibrate exhibits as an upstream regulator of DGAT1, and fenofibrate plays an anti-PCa role partially dependent on the regulation of DGAT1, suggesting a potential therapeutic approach to ameliorate this refractory tumor.

Fenofibrate attenuates the cytotoxic effect of cisplatin on lung cancer cells by enhancing the antioxidant defense system in vitro

Fenofibrate (FF) is a peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor (PPAR)-α agonist that is widely used for the treatment of hyperlipidemia. It has been shown to have pleiotropic actions beyond its hypolipidemic effect. FF has been shown to exert a cytotoxic effect on some cancer cells when used at higher than clinically relevant concentrations; on the other hand, its cytoprotective effect on normal cells has also been reported. The present study assessed the effect of FF on cisplatin (CDDP) cytotoxicity to lung cancer cells in vitro. The results demonstrated that the effect of FF on lung cancer cells depends on its concentration. FF at ≤50 µM, which is a clinically achievable blood concentration, attenuated CDDP cytotoxicity to lung cancer cells, whereas FF at ≥100 µM, albeit clinically unachievable, had an anticancer effect. The mechanism of FF attenuation of CDDP cytotoxicity involved PPAR-α-dependent aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) expression, which in turn stimulated nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) expression and antioxidant production, resulting in lung cancer cell protection from CDDP-evoked oxidative damage. In conclusion, the present study revealed that FF, at clinically relevant concentrations, attenuated CDDP cytotoxicity to lung cancer cells by enhancing the antioxidant defense system through activation of a pathway that involves the PPAR-α-PPAR response element-AhR xenobiotic response element-Nrf2-antioxidant response element. These findings suggested that concomitant use of FF with CDDP may compromise the efficacy of chemotherapy. Although the anticancer property of FF has recently attracted much attention, concentrations that exceed clinically relevant concentrations are required.

The role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in the tumor microenvironment, tumor cell metabolism, and anticancer therapy

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) have been extensively studied for over 3 decades and consist of three isotypes, including PPARα, γ, and β/δ, that were originally considered key metabolic regulators controlling energy homeostasis in the body. Cancer has become a leading cause of human mortality worldwide, and the role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in cancer is increasingly being investigated, especially the deep molecular mechanisms and effective cancer therapies. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors are an important class of lipid sensors and are involved in the regulation of multiple metabolic pathways and cell fate. They can regulate cancer progression in different tissues by activating endogenous or synthetic compounds. This review emphasizes the significance and knowledge of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in the tumor microenvironment, tumor cell metabolism, and anti-cancer treatment by summarizing recent research on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. In general, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors either promote or suppress cancer in different types of tumor microenvironments. The emergence of this difference depends on various factors, including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor type, cancer type, and tumor stage. Simultaneously, the effect of anti-cancer therapy based on drug-targeted PPARs differs or even opposes among the three peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor homotypes and different cancer types. Therefore, the current status and challenges of the use of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors agonists and antagonists in cancer treatment are further explored in this review.

Mechanisms of Prostate Cancer Cells Survival and Their Therapeutic Targeting

Prostate cancer (PCa) is today the second most common cancer in the world, with almost 400,000 deaths annually. Multiple factors are involved in the etiology of PCa, such as older age, genetic mutations, ethnicity, diet, or inflammation. Modern treatment of PCa involves radical surgical treatment or radiation therapy in the stages when the tumor is limited to the prostate. When metastases develop, the standard procedure is androgen deprivation therapy, which aims to reduce the level of circulating testosterone, which is achieved by surgical or medical castration. However, when the level of testosterone decreases to the castration level, the tumor cells adapt to the new conditions through different mechanisms, which enable their unhindered growth and survival, despite the therapy. New knowledge about the biology of the so-called of castration-resistant PCa and the way it adapts to therapy will enable the development of new drugs, whose goal is to prolong the survival of patients with this stage of the disease, which will be discussed in this review.

Acquired drug resistance interferes with the susceptibility of prostate cancer cells to metabolic stress

Background

Metformin is an inhibitor of oxidative phosphorylation that displays an array of anticancer activities. The interference of metformin with the activity of multi-drug resistance systems in cancer cells has been reported. However, the consequences of the acquired chemoresistance for the adaptative responses of cancer cells to metformin-induced stress and for their phenotypic evolution remain unaddressed.

Methods

Using a range of phenotypic and metabolic assays, we assessed the sensitivity of human prostate cancer PC-3 and DU145 cells, and their drug-resistant lineages (PC-3_DCX20 and DU145_DCX20), to combined docetaxel/metformin stress. Their adaptation responses have been assessed, in particular the shifts in their metabolic profile and invasiveness.

Results

Metformin increased the sensitivity of PC-3 wild-type (WT) cells to docetaxel, as illustrated by the attenuation of their motility, proliferation, and viability after the combined drug application. These effects correlated with the accumulation of energy carriers (NAD(P)H and ATP) and with the inactivation of ABC drug transporters in docetaxel/metformin-treated PC-3 WT cells. Both PC-3 WT and PC-3_DCX20 reacted to metformin with the Warburg effect; however, PC-3_DCX20 cells were considerably less susceptible to the cytostatic/misbalancing effects of metformin. Concomitantly, an epithelial–mesenchymal transition and Cx43 upregulation was seen in these cells, but not in other more docetaxel/metformin-sensitive DU145_DCX20 populations. Stronger cytostatic effects of the combined fenofibrate/docetaxel treatment confirmed that the fine-tuning of the balance between energy supply and expenditure determines cellular welfare under metabolic stress.

Conclusions

Collectively, our data identify the mechanisms that underlie the limited potential of metformin for the chemotherapy of drug-resistant tumors. Metformin can enhance the sensitivity of cancer cells to chemotherapy by inducing their metabolic decoupling/imbalance. However, the acquired chemoresistance of cancer cells impairs this effect, facilitates cellular adaptation to metabolic stress, and prompts the invasive front formation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s11658-022-00400-1.

Long-Term Fenofibrate Treatment Stimulates the Phenotypic Microevolution of Prostate Cancer Cells In Vitro

Fenofibrate is a widely used anti-hyperlipidemic agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα). As a metabolic blocker, fenofibrate interferes with cancer promotion/progression via its misbalancing effects on cellular metabolism. However, the consequences of its long-term application for patients with diagnosed drug-resistant cancers are unknown. We addressed this point by tracing the phenotypic microevolution of naïve and drug-resistant prostate cancer PC3_DCX20 cells that underwent a long-term exposition to 10 μM and 50 μM fenofibrate. Their resistance to fenofibrate, metabolic profile and invasive phenotype were estimated in the control conditions and under fenofibrate-induced stress. Apparently, drug efflux systems are not effective against the cytostatic FF action. However, wtPC3 and PC3_DCX20 cells that survived the long-term 50 μM fenofibrate treatment gave rise to lineages that displayed an increased proliferation rate, lower motility in the control conditions and enhanced fenofibrate resistance. Attenuated fenofibrate bioavailability modified the pattern of PC3 microevolution, as illustrated by phenotypic differences between wtPC3/PC3_DCX20 lineages propagated in the presence of 50 μM and 10 μM fenofibrate. Collectively, our observations indicate that fenofibrate acts as a selective factor that affects prostate cancer microevolution. We also pinpoint potential consequences of long-term exposition of prostate cancer patients to metabolic blockers.

Novel Insights into Autophagy and Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Autophagy is a complex process involved in several cell activities, including tissue growth, differentiation, metabolic modulation, and cancer development. In prostate cancer, autophagy has a pivotal role in the regulation of apoptosis and disease progression. Several molecular pathways are involved, including PI3K/AKT/mTOR. However, depending on the cellular context, autophagy may play either a detrimental or a protective role in prostate cancer. For this purpose, current evidence has investigated how autophagy interacts within these complex interactions. In this article, we discuss novel findings about autophagic machinery in order to better understand the therapeutic response and the chemotherapy resistance of prostate cancer. Autophagic-modulation drugs have been employed in clinical trials to regulate autophagy, aiming to improve the response to chemotherapy or to anti-cancer treatments. Furthermore, the genetic signature of autophagy has been found to have a potential means to stratify prostate cancer aggressiveness. Unfortunately, stronger evidence is needed to better understand this field, and the application of these findings in clinical practice still remains poorly feasible.

Targeting autophagy in prostate cancer: preclinical and clinical evidence for therapeutic response

Prostate cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide and new estimates revealed prostate cancer as the leading cause of death in men in 2021. Therefore, new strategies are pertinent in the treatment of this malignant disease. Macroautophagy/autophagy is a “self-degradation” mechanism capable of facilitating the turnover of long-lived and toxic macromolecules and organelles. Recently, attention has been drawn towards the role of autophagy in cancer and how its modulation provides effective cancer therapy. In the present review, we provide a mechanistic discussion of autophagy in prostate cancer. Autophagy can promote/inhibit proliferation and survival of prostate cancer cells. Besides, metastasis of prostate cancer cells is affected (via induction and inhibition) by autophagy. Autophagy can affect the response of prostate cancer cells to therapy such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, given the close association between autophagy and apoptosis. Increasing evidence has demonstrated that upstream mediators such as AMPK, non-coding RNAs, KLF5, MTOR and others regulate autophagy in prostate cancer. Anti-tumor compounds, for instance phytochemicals, dually inhibit or induce autophagy in prostate cancer therapy. For improving prostate cancer therapy, nanotherapeutics such as chitosan nanoparticles have been developed. With respect to the context-dependent role of autophagy in prostate cancer, genetic tools such as siRNA and CRISPR-Cas9 can be utilized for targeting autophagic genes. Finally, these findings can be translated into preclinical and clinical studies to improve survival and prognosis of prostate cancer patients.

• Prostate cancer is among the leading causes of death in men where targeting autophagy is of importance in treatment;

• Autophagy governs proliferation and metastasis capacity of prostate cancer cells;

• Autophagy modulation is of interest in improving the therapeutic response of prostate cancer cells;

• Molecular pathways, especially involving non-coding RNAs, regulate autophagy in prostate cancer;

• Autophagy possesses both diagnostic and prognostic roles in prostate cancer, with promises for clinical application.

Tumor microenvironment pH-responsive pentagonal gold prism-based nanoplatform for multimodal imaging and combined therapy of castration-resistant prostate cancer

Given that there is lack of effective therapies for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), the combination of photothermal (PTT), photodynamic (PDT), and chemical therapy (CT) has emerged as a prominent strategy. Tumor-targeted delivery and controlled release of antitumor drug are key-elements of any combined therapy. Considering these important elements, we designed and constructed tumor microenvironment (TME)-activated nanoprobes (PGP/CaCO₃@IR820/DTX-HA). The CaCO₃ shell could efficiently entrap the photosensitizer IR820 and the chemotherapeutic docetaxel (DTX) on the surface of pentagonal gold prisms (PGPs) to prevent elimination from the circulation, and it could act as a TME-trigger to achieve TME-responsive drug release. After modification with hyaluronic acid, PGP/CaCO₃@IR820/DTX-HA was capable of synergistic TME-triggered PTT/PDT/CT and tumor-targeted delivery. Our in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrate that PGP/CaCO₃@IR820/DTX-HA could achieve synergistic antitumor effects following near-infrared (NIR)-light irradiation. In addition, using the NIR fluorescence signal from IR820 and the photoacoustic (PA) signal from PGPs, i.e., through multimodal fluorescence/photoacoustic imaging, we could monitor the in vivo distribution and excretion of PGP/CaCO₃@IR820/DTX-HA. Therefore, it can be concluded that PGP/CaCO₃@IR820/DTX-HA shows promising clinical translational potential as a treatment for CRPC. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Utilizing pentagonal gold prisms (PGPs), we constructed a multifunctional nanoplatform (PGP/CaCO₃@IR820/DTX-HA) for effectively delivering agents into the tumor microenvironment (TME) for the diagnosis and therapy of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The synthetic nanoplatform can satisfy TME-activated synergistic photothermal therapy (PTT)/photodynamic therapy (PDT)/chemical therapy (CT) and NIR fluorescence imaging/photoacoustic (PA) imaging. Hyaluronic acid (HA) on the surface of nanoplatform allowed the specific tumor-targeting capacity and biocompatibility. In conclusion, PGP/CaCO₃@IR820/DTX-HA could be a promising integrated nanoplatform for CRPC diagnosis and treatment.

PPARα agonist fenofibrate relieves acquired resistance to gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer by promoting apoptosis via PPARα/AMPK/AKT/FoxO1 pathway

Recent studies show that intracellular accumulation of cholesterol leads to acquired resistance to gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. In this study we investigated how to regulate the cholesterol levels in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC cells. We showed that intracellular cholesterol levels in gefitinib-resistant cell lines (PC-9/GR, H1975, H1650, and A549) were significantly higher than that in gefitinib-sensitive cell line (PC-9). Treatment with gefitinib (5 μM) significantly increased intracellular cholesterol levels in PC-9/GR, H1975, and H1650 cells. Gefitinib treatment downregulated the expression of PPARα, LXRα, and ABCA1, leading to dysregulation of cholesterol efflux pathway. We found that a lipid-lowering drug fenofibrate (20, 40 μM) dose-dependently increased the expression of PPARα, LXRα, and ABCA1, decreased the intracellular cholesterol levels, and enhanced the antiproliferative effects of gefitinib in PC-9/GR, H1975, and H1650 cells. We revealed that fenofibrate increased the gefitinib-induced apoptosis via regulating the key proteins involved in the intrinsic apoptosis pathway. In PC-9/GR, H1975 and H1650 cells, fenofibrate dose-dependently increased the expression of AMPK, FoxO1, and decreased the expression of AKT, which were remarkably weakened by knockdown of PPARα. In PC-9/GR cell xenograft mice, combined administration of gefitinib (25 mg · kg^-1 · d^-1) and fenofibrate (100 mg · kg^-1 · d^-1) caused remarkable inhibition on tumor growth as compared to treatment with either drug alone. All the results suggest that fenofibrate relieves acquired resistance to gefitinib in NSCLC by promoting apoptosis via regulating PPARα/AMPK/AKT/FoxO1 pathway. We propose that combination of gefitinib and fenofibrate is a potential strategy for overcoming the gefitinib resistance in NSCLC.

Stress-Induced Polyploid Giant Cancer Cells: Unique Way of Formation and Non-Negligible Characteristics

Polyploidy is a conserved mechanism in cell development and stress responses. Multiple stresses of treatment, including radiation and chemotherapy drugs, can induce the polyploidization of tumor cells. Through endoreplication or cell fusion, diploid tumor cells convert into giant tumor cells with single large nuclei or multiple small nucleuses. Some of the stress-induced colossal cells, which were previously thought to be senescent and have no ability to proliferate, can escape the fate of death by a special way. They can remain alive at least before producing progeny cells through asymmetric cell division, a depolyploidization way named neosis. Those large and danger cells are recognized as polyploid giant cancer cells (PGCCs). Such cells are under suspicion of being highly related to tumor recurrence and metastasis after treatment and can bring new targets for cancer therapy. However, differences in formation mechanisms between PGCCs and well-accepted polyploid cancer cells are largely unknown. In this review, the methods used in different studies to induce polyploid cells are summarized, and several mechanisms of polyploidization are demonstrated. Besides, we discuss some characteristics related to the poor prognosis caused by PGCCs in order to provide readers with a more comprehensive understanding of these huge cells.

DCX and CRABP2 are candidate genes for differential diagnosis between pre-chemotherapy embryonic and alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma in pediatric patients

IMPORTANCE

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children. More than 90% of cases are classified as embryonic RMS (ERMS) or alveolar RMS (ARMS). ERMS has a worse prognosis than ARMS. Early differential diagnosis is of paramount importance for optimization of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To identify genes that are differentially expressed between ARMS and ERMS, which can be used for accurate rhabdomyosarcoma classification.

METHODS

Three Gene Expression Omnibus datasets composed of ARMS and ERMS samples were screened and 35 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and area under the curve analysis was performed for these 35 DEGs and seven candidate genes with the best differential expression scores between ARMS and ERMS were determined. The expression of these seven candidate genes was validated by immunohistochemical analysis of pre-chemotherapy ARMS and ERMS specimens.

RESULTS

The levels of DCX and CRABP2 were confirmed to be remarkably different between paraffin-embedded ARMS and ERMS tissues, while EGFR abundance was only marginally different between these two RMS subtypes.

INTERPRETATION

DCX and CRABP2 are potential biomarkers for distinguishing ARMS from ERMS in pre-chemotherapy pediatric patients.

Cholesterol Metabolic Reprogramming in Cancer and Its Pharmacological Modulation as Therapeutic Strategy

Cholesterol is a ubiquitous sterol with many biological functions, which are crucial for proper cellular signaling and physiology. Indeed, cholesterol is essential in maintaining membrane physical properties, while its metabolism is involved in bile acid production and steroid hormone biosynthesis. Additionally, isoprenoids metabolites of the mevalonate pathway support protein-prenylation and dolichol, ubiquinone and the heme a biosynthesis. Cancer cells rely on cholesterol to satisfy their increased nutrient demands and to support their uncontrolled growth, thus promoting tumor development and progression. Indeed, transformed cells reprogram cholesterol metabolism either by increasing its uptake and de novo biosynthesis, or deregulating the efflux. Alternatively, tumor can efficiently accumulate cholesterol into lipid droplets and deeply modify the activity of key cholesterol homeostasis regulators. In light of these considerations, altered pathways of cholesterol metabolism might represent intriguing pharmacological targets for the development of exploitable strategies in the context of cancer therapy. Thus, this work aims to discuss the emerging evidence of in vitro and in vivo studies, as well as clinical trials, on the role of cholesterol pathways in the treatment of cancer, starting from already available cholesterol-lowering drugs (statins or fibrates), and moving towards novel potential pharmacological inhibitors or selective target modulators.

Temozolomide Induces the Acquisition of Invasive Phenotype by O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT)+ Glioblastoma Cells in a Snail-1/Cx43-Dependent Manner

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) recurrences after temozolomide (TMZ) treatment result from the expansion of drug-resistant and potentially invasive GBM cells. This process is facilitated by O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT), which counteracts alkylating TMZ activity. We traced the expansion of invasive cell lineages under persistent chemotherapeutic stress in MGMT^low (U87) and MGMT^high (T98G) GBM populations to look into the mechanisms of TMZ-induced microevolution of GBM invasiveness. TMZ treatment induced short-term, pro-invasive phenotypic shifts of U87 cells, in the absence of Snail-1 activation. They were illustrated by a transient induction of their motility and followed by the hypertrophy and the signs of senescence in scarce U87 sub-populations that survived long-term TMZ stress. In turn, MGMT^high T98G cells reacted to the long-term TMZ treatment with the permanent induction of invasiveness. Ectopic Snail-1 down-regulation attenuated this effect, whereas its up-regulation augmented T98G invasiveness. MGMT^low and MGMT^high cells both reacted to the long-term TMZ stress with the induction of Cx43 expression. However, only in MGMT^high T98G populations, Cx43 was directly involved in the induction of invasiveness, as manifested by the induction of T98G invasiveness after ectopic Cx43 up-regulation and by the opposite effect after Cx43 down-regulation. Collectively, Snail-1/Cx43-dependent signaling participates in the long-term TMZ-induced microevolution of the invasive GBM front. High MGMT activity remains a prerequisite for this process, even though MGMT-related GBM chemoresistance is not necessary for its initiation.

Stiffening of DU145 prostate cancer cells driven by actin filaments - microtubule crosstalk conferring resistance to microtubule-targeting drugs

The crucial role of microtubules in the mitotic-related segregation of chromosomes makes them an excellent target for anticancer microtubule targeting drugs (MTDs) such as vinflunine (VFL), colchicine (COL), and docetaxel (DTX). MTDs affect mitosis by directly perturbing the structural organisation of microtubules. By a direct assessment of the biomechanical properties of prostate cancer DU145 cells exposed to different MTDs using atomic force microscopy, we show that cell stiffening is a response to the application of all the studied MTDs (VFL, COL, DTX). Changes in cellular rigidity are typically attributed to remodelling of the actin filaments in the cytoskeleton. Here, we demonstrate that cell stiffening can be driven by crosstalk between actin filaments and microtubules in MTD-treated cells. Our findings improve the interpretation of biomechanical data obtained for living cells in studies of various physiological and pathological processes.

PPAR-α Modulators as Current and Potential Cancer Treatments

Cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. PPAR modulators may hold great potential for the management of cancer patients. Indeed, PPARs are critical sensors and regulators of lipid, and they are able to promote eNOS activation, regulate immunity and inflammation response, and affect proliferation and differentiation of cancer cells. Cancer, a name given to a group of diseases, is characterized by multiple distinctive biological behaviors, including angiogenesis, abnormal cell proliferation, aerobic glycolysis, inflammation, etc. In the last decade, emerging evidence has shown that PPAR-α, a nuclear hormone receptor, can modulate carcinogenesis via exerting effects on one or several characteristic pathological behaviors of cancer. Therefore, the multi-functional PPAR modulators have substantial promise in various types of cancer therapies. This review aims to consolidate the functions of PPAR-α, as well as discuss the current and potential applications of PPAR-α agonists and antagonists in tackling cancer.

CD44+ cells determine fenofibrate-induced microevolution of drug-resistance in prostate cancer cell populations

Combinations of metabolic blockers (incl. fenofibrate) with chemotherapeutic drugs interfere with the drug-resistance of prostate cancer cells. However, their effect on cancer stem cells-dependent microevolution of prostate cancer malignancy remains unaddressed. Here, we hypothesize that the combined docetaxel/fenofibrate treatment prompts the selective expansion of cancer stem cells that affects the microevolution of their progenies. Accordingly, we adapted a combined in vitro/in vivo approach to identify biological and therapeutic consequences of this process. Minute subpopulations of docetaxel-resistant CD133high and/or CD44high cancer stem cell-like (SCL) cells were found in prostate cancer DU145 and PC3 cell populations. When pretreated with docetaxel, they readily differentiated into docetaxel-resistant CD44negative "bulk" cells, thus accounting for the microevolution of drug-resistant cell lineages. Combined docetaxel/fenofibrate treatment induced the generation of poly(morpho)nuclear giant cells and drug-resistant CD44high SCL cells. However, the CD44negative offspring of docetaxel- and docetaxel/fenofibrate-treated SCLs remained relatively sensitive to the combined treatment, while retaining enhanced resistance to docetaxel. Long-term propagation of drug-resistant SCL-derived lineages in the absence of docetaxel/fenofibrate resulted in their reverse microevolution toward the drug-sensitivity and invasive phenotype. Consequently, prostate tumors were able to recover from the combined docetaxel/fenofibrate stress after the initial arrest of their expansion in vivo. In conclusion, we have confirmed the potential of fenofibrate for the metronomic treatment of drug-resistant prostate tumors. However, docetaxel/fenofibrate-induced selective expansion of hyper-resistant CD44high SCL prostate cells and their "bulk" progenies prompts the microevolution of prostate tumor drug-resistance. This process can limit the implementation of metabolic chemotherapy in prostate cancer treatment.