Identifying the Need to Discuss Infertility Concerns Affecting Testicular Cancer Patients: An Evaluation (INDICATE Study)

Oncological treatments have limited effects on the fertility prognosis in testicular cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Testicular cancer is the most common solid tumour among young men in the reproductive phase. After completing cancer treatment, up to 77% of cancer survivors report an interest in paternity after completing cancer treatment. To preserve fertility, most guidelines recommend that physicians should counsel their patients about sperm cryopreservation before initiating gonadotoxic therapy. However, few studies have assessed fertility parameters after testicular cancer therapies over the last 20 years.

OBJECTIVES

To close the gap of data regarding gonadotoxicity of testicular cancer therapies to enable more accurate counselling regarding fertility preservation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase and Cochrane until December 2022. The systematic review included studies of men who had undergone all types of unilateral testicular cancer treatment, whereas the meta-analysis excluded studies with unspecified treatments, less than 10 patients for outcome evaluation or rare tumours. Infertility (i.e. azoospermia, failure to achieve paternity or the usage of cryosperm) was defined as outcome.

RESULTS

The qualitative analysis included 30 studies with a total of 13,718 men after unilateral testicular cancer. Treatment comprised active surveillance after unilateral orchidectomy (32.7%), radiotherapy (23.1%), standard- or low-dose chemotherapy (33.7%) and high-dose chemotherapy (1.4%). Post-treatment spermiograms were analysed in 17 studies. The quantitative synthesis included 23 studies, revealing an overall pooled prevalence of infertility (95% CI) of 14% (9%-21%). Azoospermia occurred in 8% (6%-12%). For good-prognosis patients who received standard therapy, the overall prevalence of infertility was only 4% (2%-10%).

CONCLUSION

So far, this very first meta-analysis of overall infertility prevalence provides the best approximation of fertility prognosis for men who have undergone testicular cancer therapy. Despite the low prevalence of infertility, it is still recommended to undergo sperm cryopreservation because of the uncertainty of the subsequent therapy and the lack of large longitudinal data on individual treatment effects.

Psychological Aspects of and Support for Survivors Attempting to Conceive During or After Cancer Treatments: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review

Advances in medical technology are expected to increase the possibilities for pregnancy for women during and after cancer treatment. We aimed to clarify the psychological dimensions of cancer diagnosis for patients hoping for a pregnancy (their own or their spouse/partner's) during or post-treatment and identify ways to improve support for these survivors and their families. A systematic literature review was conducted in May 2023 using six electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Ichushi-Web, and CINAHL. The search targeted English and Japanese studies with English abstracts published between January 1, 2001, and May 10, 2023. Search terms related to cancer, pregnancy, and psychological aspects were included. The initial search identified 1328 potentially relevant studies after removing duplicates. Subsequently, two reviewers screened article titles and abstracts to exclude studies with no data, those unrelated to pregnancy, and so on, and identified 44 potentially relevant studies. Two reviewers then reviewed the full text of each study, and 20 articles finally met the inclusion criteria. Several studies indicated that trying to conceive negatively impacts survivors' finances, their relationships with their spouses/partners, and their mental health. Although many participants required fertility counseling, few received such opportunities. When cancer survivors try to conceive, they experience physical, psychological, and social burdens; moreover, many report a lack of access to fertility counseling or sufficient information about reproductive health care. Health care professionals should provide patients with updated and more accurate information on reproductive medicine and fertility counseling to enhance pregnancy support during the survivorship phase.

Oncological microdissection testicular sperm extraction (Onco-microTESE) outcomes for fertility preservation of patients with testicular cancer with azoospermia or severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia

OBJECTIVE

To determine the success rate of oncological microdissection testicular sperm extraction (onco-microTESE) in patients with testicular cancer (TC) with azoospermia and severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT; <1 million/mL sperm) and to explore any factors that may predict success.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Case series of outcomes from all consecutive patients (42 testes in 38 patients) that presented or were referred to a single specialist tertiary referral centre for fertility management in the context of TC with severe OAT or azoospermia between August 2015 and August 2022. Biochemical, radiological, and histological parameters were collected for all patients. All patients underwent onco-microTESE (simultaneous radical inguinal orchidectomy with ex vivo microTESE of the affected testis). Those with unsuccessful surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) from the affected testis underwent contemporaneous contralateral microTESE, if no contraindication was present. The primary outcome was successful SSR from the affected testicle sufficient for assisted reproductive techniques. Secondary outcomes included contralateral microTESE success, the time from referral to procedure, and the total successful fertility preservation rate.

RESULTS

Initial onco-microTESE was successful in 19 of 31 patients (61%) with azoospermia. Contralateral microTESE was successful in a further two of eight patients with azoospermia with failed onco-microTESE. Overall, 22/31 patients with azoospermia (71%) had successful fertility preservation in this series. In addition, six of seven patients with severe OAT had further sperm harvested by onco-microTESE to maximise their fertility preservation. All surgery was performed within median (interquartile range) of 7 (5-13) days from presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Onco-microTESE represents an effective method of fertility preservation for sub-fertile patients with TC without delaying oncological treatment. Knowledge of the fertility status at first presentation is essential to allow for such additional options for optimal fertility preservation in TC.

Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient Experiences in Fertility Preservation: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) with Cancer

With better survival rates for patients diagnosed with cancer, more attention has been focused on future risks, like fertility decline due to gonadotoxic treatment. In this regard, the emphasis during counselling regarding possible preservation options is often on the treatment itself, meaning that the medical and emotional needs of patients regarding counselling, treatment, and future fertility are often overlooked. This review focuses on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient experiences regarding fertility preservation (FP)-among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer. A systematic review of the literature, with a systematic search of online databases, was performed, resulting in 61 selected articles. A quality assessment was performed by a mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT). Based on this search, three important topics emerged: initiating discussion about the risk of fertility decline, acknowledging the importance of future fertility, and recognizing the need for more verbal and written patient-specific information. In addition, patients value follow-up care and the opportunity to rediscuss FP and their concerns about future fertility and use of stored material. A clear FP healthcare pathway can prevent delays in receiving a referral to a fertility specialist to discuss FP options and initiating FP treatment. This patient-centered approach will optimize FP experiences and help to establish a process to achieve long-term follow up after FP treatment.

Adverse health outcomes and global quality of life in long-term testicular cancer survivors: a longitudinal 30-year perspective

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to characterize the prevalence of self-reported adverse health outcomes (AHOs), track changes in AHOs, and examine their impact on health-related quality of life (HrQoL) in testicular cancer survivors (TCSs) who were diagnosed between 1980 and 1994. These assessments were conducted during two survey waves (SWs), with the first occurring ∼12 years after surgery-only or platinum-based chemotherapy (PBCT), and the second ∼28 years after initial treatment. The study primarily focused on 'typical AHOs', which included Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy (PSN), Raynaud's phenomenon, Tinnitus, and Hearing loss.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 427 TCSs were included in the evaluation, distributed as follows: surgery-only group (n = 155), PBCT-standard group with ≤850 mg cisplatin (n = 222), and PBCT-high group with >850 mg cisplatin (n = 50). For comparison of HrQoL, men from the general population served as a control group (referred to as 'Norms'). The statistical significance level was set at P < 0.05, and clinical importance, in terms of testing HrQoL differences, was defined as Δ ≥2.5 points.

RESULTS

A higher number of TCSs who underwent PBCT reported experiencing typical AHOs compared with those who had surgery only. The highest prevalence rates were observed among TCSs who had undergone PBCT-high. Further, the number of TCSs describing typical AHOs, except Raynaud's phenomenon, increased during the observation period of 16 years. At the last SW, a median of 4 AHOs (any type) were reported after PBCT-high compared with a median of 2 AHOs after Surgery-only or after PBCT-standard. With Surgery-only as reference, PBCT-high, but not PBCT-standard, was associated with decreasing physical HrQoL in the last SW (A2 Regression coefficient: -4.3; P = 0.008). When comparing all TCSs with Norms no clinically important difference in physical and mental HrQoL was observed at either SW. However, at the last SW, TCSs after PBCT-high therapy represented a subgroup of TCSs with clinically important impairment of HRQoL. Of the typical AHOs, only PSN reduced HrQoL. Chronic fatigue, pain, anxiety/depression, sexual dysfunction, unemployment, being single, and low education were additional covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

After a median of 28 years since their treatment, HrQoL in TCSs was found to be comparable to that of Norms. This similarity held true even though AHOs, especially after PBCT-high, were becoming more prevalent among TCSs. The study revealed that individuals with a history of PBCT-high are at a high risk of experiencing a significantly increased prevalence of long-term AHOs, which subsequently leads to diminished HrQoL. It is crucial to recognize and provide specialized attention to these TCSs during lifelong follow-up care.

Therapeutic targets and biomarkers of tumor immunotherapy: response versus non-response

Cancers are highly complex diseases that are characterized by not only the overgrowth of malignant cells but also an altered immune response. The inhibition and reprogramming of the immune system play critical roles in tumor initiation and progression. Immunotherapy aims to reactivate antitumor immune cells and overcome the immune escape mechanisms of tumors. Represented by immune checkpoint blockade and adoptive cell transfer, tumor immunotherapy has seen tremendous success in the clinic, with the capability to induce long-term regression of some tumors that are refractory to all other treatments. Among them, immune checkpoint blocking therapy, represented by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (nivolumab) and CTLA-4 inhibitors (ipilimumab), has shown encouraging therapeutic effects in the treatment of various malignant tumors, such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma. In addition, with the advent of CAR-T, CAR-M and other novel immunotherapy methods, immunotherapy has entered a new era. At present, evidence indicates that the combination of multiple immunotherapy methods may be one way to improve the therapeutic effect. However, the overall clinical response rate of tumor immunotherapy still needs improvement, which warrants the development of novel therapeutic designs as well as the discovery of biomarkers that can guide the prescription of these agents. Learning from the past success and failure of both clinical and basic research is critical for the rational design of studies in the future. In this article, we describe the efforts to manipulate the immune system against cancer and discuss different targets and cell types that can be exploited to promote the antitumor immune response.

The impact of testicular cancer and its treatment on masculinity: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review was to synthesise the literature on the topic of masculinity and testicular cancer (TC) and investigate the relative impact of TC on men's view of their masculinity.

METHODS

Searches were conducted across four databases (MEDline, PsycInfo, CINAHL Plus and Scopus) for articles published before April 2022 that included (1) TC and (2) masculinity. Two researchers independently rated studies for inclusion with a third resolving conflicts. Of the 6464 articles screened, 24 articles (10 quantitative and 14 qualitative) were included in the review. Articles were rated for quality and a narrative synthesis was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, results indicated some men experience a shift in the way they relate to their sense of masculinity following diagnosis and treatment for TC. Being single and without children was related to the experience of negative masculinity-related outcomes, possibly due to a compounding lack of relational support and being unable to conform to protector, provider traditions. Men who described testicle loss as symbolic of their diminished masculinity were also negatively impacted. However, recent, high-quality literature on the topic using standardised masculinity measures was limited.

CONCLUSION

Some men experience a reduced sense of masculinity after TC, however the impact of TC on masculinity remains person dependent. Further research using validated masculinity measures is required to uncover psycho-social variables that may account for whether and how meaning is made between TC and its treatment and any subsequent impact on perceived masculinity. Such factors may better support these men in life beyond cancer.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42020185649.

Survey of Long-Term Experiences of Sperm Cryopreservation in Oncological and Non-Oncological Patients: Usage and Reproductive Outcomes of a Large Monocentric Cohort

Progress in oncological treatment has led to an improved long-term survival of young male cancer patients over the last decades. However, standard cancer treatments frequently implicate fertility-damaging potential. Cryopreservation of sperm is the current standard option to preserve patient’s fertility after treatment, yet long-term data on usage and reproductive experiences is still limited. Natural fertility after treatment and especially in relation to the type of treatment has been poorly analyzed so far. Therefore, we performed a retrospective survey including male patients with an indication for gonadotoxic treatment who cryopreserved reproductive material at our institution between 1994 and 2017. Study questionnaires regarding treatment, material usage, and reproductive outcomes were sent to eligible patients. Additionally, semen analyses of study participants from the time of cryopreservation were evaluated. A total of 99 patients were included in the study. Respondents’ median age was 38.0 years. Most frequent diagnoses were testicular cancer (29.3%) and lymphoma (26.3%). A further 8.1% suffered from autoimmune diseases. Testicular cancer patients had a significantly lower pre-treatment median sperm concentration (18.0 million/ml) compared to non-testicular cancer patients (54.2 million/ml). Until November 2020, the determined sperm usage and cumulative live-birth rate per couple were 17.2% and 58.8%, respectively. Most sperm users received treatments with high (40.0%) or intermediate (33.3%) gonadotoxic potential. 20.7% of all patients reported to had fathered at least one naturally conceived child after treatment, this being the case especially if they had been treated with less or potentially gonadotoxic therapies. In conclusion, our findings emphasize the importance of sperm cryopreservation in the context of male fertility preservation. Furthermore, they indicate that the gonadotoxic potential of patients’ treatments could represent a predictive factor for sperm usage.