Managing Difficulties of Microsatellite Instability Testing in Endometrial Cancer-Limitations and Advantages of Four Different PCR-Based Approaches

Microsatellite instability and mismatch repair protein deficiency: equal predictive markers?

Current clinical guidelines recommend mismatch repair (MMR) protein immunohistochemistry (IHC) or molecular microsatellite instability (MSI) tests as predictive markers of immunotherapies. Most of the pathological guidelines consider MMR protein IHC as the gold standard test to identify cancers with MMR deficiency and recommend molecular MSI tests only in special circumstances or to screen for Lynch syndrome. However, there are data in the literature which suggest that the two test types may not be equal. For example, molecular epidemiology studies reported different rates of deficient MMR (dMMR) and MSI in various cancer types. Additionally, direct comparisons of the two tests revealed relatively frequent discrepancies between MMR IHC and MSI tests, especially in non-colorectal and non-endometrial cancers and in cases with unusual dMMR phenotypes. There are also scattered clinical data showing that the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is different if the patient selection was based on dMMR versus MSI status of the cancers. All these observations question the current dogma that dMMR phenotype and genetic MSI status are equal predictive markers of the immunotherapies.

Comparison of standard mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability tests in a large cancer series

BACKGROUND

The tumor-agnostic indication of immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat cancers with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) increased the demand for such tests beyond Lynch syndrome. International guideline recommendations accept immunohistochemistry (IHC) for dMMR or molecular techniques (PCR or NGS) for MSI status determinations considering the two tests are equal, although there are scattered reports contradicting to this presumption.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Here we have directly compared four protein MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) to MSI Pentaplex PCR test in a large cancer patient cohort (n = 1306) of our diagnostic center where the two tests have been run parallel in 703 cases.

RESULTS

In this study we have found a high discrepancy rate (19.3%) of the two tests which was independent of the tumor types. The MSI PCR sensitivity for MMR IHC status was found to be very low resulting in a relatively low positive and negative predicting values. As a consequence, the correlation of the two tests was low (kappa < 0.7). During analysis of the possible contributing factors of this poor performance, we have excluded low tumor percentage of the samples, but identified dMMR phenotypes (classic versus non-classic or unusual) as possible contributors.

CONCLUSION

Although our cohort did not include samples with identified technical errors, our data strongly support previous reports that unidentified preanalytical factors might have the major influence on the poor performance of the MSI PCR and MMR IHC. Furthermore, the case is open whether the two test types are equally powerful predictive markers of immunotherapies.

An Innovative and Accurate Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Microsatellite Instability Detection Method for Colorectal and Endometrial Tumors

The detection of microsatellite instability (MSI) and mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency has become mandatory for most tumors in recent years, owing to the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors as a highly effective therapy for MMR deficiency/MSI tumors. The timely and efficient detection of MSI is valuable, and new methods are increasingly being developed. To date, MMR assessment has been performed using immunohistochemistry of the 4 MMR proteins and/or microsatellite stability/MSI using PCR, mostly using the pentaplex panel. The implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for MSI analysis would improve the effectiveness at a lower cost and in less time. This study describes the development of 8 new microsatellites combined with a classification algorithm, termed "Octaplex CaBio-MSID" (for Cancérologie Biologique MSI Detection tool), to assess MSI using NGS. A series of 303 colorectal cancer and 88 endometrial cancer samples were assessed via MSI testing using NGS using the Octaplex CaBio-MSID algorithm. The sensitivity and specificity of Octaplex CaBio-MSID were 98.4% and 98.4% for colorectal cancers, and 89.3% and 100% for endometrial cancers, respectively. This new NGS-based MSI detection method outperforms previously published methods (ie, Idylla [Biocartis], OncoMate MSI Dx [Promega], and Foundation One CDx [Roche Foundation Medicine]). Although highly efficient, Octaplex CaBio-MSID requires validation in a larger independent series of different tumor types.

Evaluation of an eight marker-panel including long mononucleotide repeat markers to detect microsatellite instability in colorectal, gastric, and endometrial cancers

BACKGROUND

Accurate determination of microsatellite instability (MSI) status is critical for optimal treatment in cancer patients. Conventional MSI markers can sometimes display subtle shifts that are difficult to interpret, especially in non-colorectal cases. We evaluated an experimental eight marker-panel including long mononucleotide repeat (LMR) markers for detection of MSI.

METHODS

The eight marker-panel was comprised of five conventional markers (BAT-25, BAT-26, NR-21, NR-24, and NR-27) and three LMR markers (BAT-52, BAT-59 and BAT-62). MSI testing was performed against 300 specimens of colorectal, gastric, and endometrial cancers through PCR followed by capillary electrophoresis length analysis.

RESULTS

The MSI testing with eight marker-panel showed 99.3% (295/297) concordance with IHC analysis excluding 3 MMR-focal deficient cases. The sensitivity of BAT-59 and BAT-62 was higher than or comparable to that of conventional markers in gastric and endometrial cancer. The mean shift size was larger in LMR markers compared to conventional markers for gastric and endometrial cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

The MSI testing with eight maker-panel showed comparable performance with IHC analysis. The LMR markers, especially BAT-59 and BAT-62, showed high sensitivity and large shifts which can contribute to increased confidence in MSI classification, especially in gastric and endometrial cancers. Further study is needed with large number of samples for the validation of these LMR markers.

Testing for deficient mismatch repair and microsatellite instability : A focused update

Testing to detect mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) has become an integral part of the routine diagnostic workup for colorectal cancer (CRC). While MSI was initially considered to be a possible indicator of a hereditary disposition to cancer (Lynch syndrome, LS), today the prediction of the therapy response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is in the foreground. Corresponding recommendations and testing algorithms are available for use in primary diagnosis (reviewed in: Rüschoff et al. 2021).Given the increasing importance for routine use and the expanding indication spectrum of ICI therapies for non-CRCs, such as endometrial, small intestinal, gastric, and biliary tract cancers, an updated review of dMMR/MSI testing is presented. The focus is on the challenges in the assessment of immunohistochemical stains and the value of PCR-based procedures, considering the expanded ICI indication spectrum. A practice-oriented flowchart for everyday diagnostic decision-making is provided that considers new data on the frequency and type of discordances between MMR-IHC and MSI-PCR findings, and the possible role of Next Generation Sequencing in clarifying them. Reference is made to the significance of systematic quality assurance measures (e.g., QuIP MSI portal and multicenter proficiency testing), including regular continued training and education.

Pathologic, immunologic, and clinical analysis of the microsatellite instability phenotype in endometrial carcinoma

The objective of this study was to determine if quantifying the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype could serve as a biomarker for clinical and immunologic features of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) endometrial cancer (EC). Patients with EC undergoing hysterectomy whose tumors demonstrated dMMR were included. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of mismatch repair proteins and polymerase chain reaction analysis of NR27, BAT25, BAT26, NR24, and NR21 microsatellite loci were performed on each case. The MSI phenotype was quantified by subtracting the number of nucleotides of each microsatellite in tumor tissue from the corresponding microsatellite in paired normal tissue and summing the absolute differences. This was termed marker sum (MS) and is a novel quantification. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were identified by IHC for CD3, CD4, and CD8 and quantified with digital image analysis. Tumor infiltration of lymphocytes and clinical characteristics were stratified by MS. Four hundred fifty-nine consecutive patients with dMMR EC were analyzed. MS ranged from 1 to 32. Post hoc, 2 cohorts were defined using receiver operating characteristic curves (MS less than 13 and MS greater than 12). With the exception of tumor grade, all clinical and pathologic features, all tumor characteristics, and the numbers of TILs were similar between cohorts. The MSI phenotype is highly variable in dMMR EC, and no correlation between the immune profile and the severity of the MSI phenotype was observed.

[Testing deficient mismatch repair and microsatellite instability : A focused update. German version]

Testing to detect mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) has become an integral part of the routine diagnostic workup for colorectal cancer (CRC). While MSI was initially considered to be a possible indicator of a hereditary disposition to cancer (Lynch syndrome, LS), today the prediction of the therapy response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is in the foreground. Corresponding recommendations and testing algorithms are available for use in primary diagnosis (reviewed in: Rüschoff et al. 2021).Given the increasing importance for routine use and the expanding indication spectrum of ICI therapies for non-CRCs, such as endometrial, small intestinal, gastric, and biliary tract cancers, an updated review of dMMR/MSI testing is presented. The focus is on the challenges in the assessment of immunohistochemical stains and the value of PCR-based procedures, considering the expanded ICI indication spectrum. A practice-oriented flowchart for everyday diagnostic decision-making is provided that considers new data on the frequency and type of discordances between MMR-IHC and MSI-PCR findings, and the possible role of Next Generation Sequencing in clarifying them. Reference is made to the significance of systematic quality assurance measures (e.g., QuIP MSI portal and multicenter proficiency testing), including regular continued training and education.

Concordance in detection of microsatellite instability by PCR and NGS in routinely processed tumor specimens of several cancer types

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) occurs in several cancer types and is commonly used for prognosis and as a predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint therapy.

METHODS

We analyzed n = 263 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor specimens (127 colorectal cancer (CRC), 55 endometrial cancer (EC), 33 stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD), and 48 solid tumor specimens of other tumor types) with a capillary electrophoresis based multiplex monomorphic marker MSI-PCR panel and an amplicon-based NGS assay for microsatellite instability (MSI+). In total, n = 103 (39.2%) cases with a known defect of the DNA mismatch repair system (dMMR), determined by a loss in protein expression of MSH2/MSH6 (n = 48, 46.6%) or MLH1/PMS2 (n = 55, 53.4%), were selected. Cases with an isolated loss of MSH6 or PMS2 were excluded.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity and specificity of the NGS assay in comparison with the MSI-PCR were 92.2% and 98.8%. With CRC cases a nearly optimal concordance was reached (sensitivity 98.1% and specificity 100.0%). Whereas EC cases only show a sensitivity of 88.6% and a specificity of 95.2%, caused by several cases with instability in less than five monomorphic markers, which could be difficult to analyze by NGS (subtle MSI+ phenotype).

CONCLUSIONS

MSI analysis of FFPE DNA by NGS is feasible and the results show a high concordance in comparison with the monomorphic marker MSI-PCR. However, cases with a subtle MSI+ phenotype, most frequently manifest in EC, have a risk of a false-negative result by NGS and should be preferentially analyzed by capillary electrophoresis.

Comprehensive genomic and immunohistochemical profiles and outcomes of immunotherapy in patients with recurrent or advanced cervical cancer

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate genomic and immunohistochemical (IHC) profiles and immunotherapy outcomes in patients with cervical cancer.

Methods

Patients with recurrent cervical cancer who underwent tumor next-generation sequencing (NGS) with the TruSight Oncology 500 panel at Yonsei Cancer Center between June 2019 and February 2022, were identified. Patients who received treatment with checkpoint inhibitors during the same period were also identified. Clinical information, including histology, stage, human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype, IHCs profile, and therapy outcome, was reviewed.

Results

We identified 115 patients treated for recurrent cervical cancer, including 74 patients who underwent tumor NGS. Most of these 74 patients were initially diagnosed with advanced stage (63.6%) and had squamous cell histology (52.7%), and high-risk HPV (76.9%). Based on IHC analysis, the programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score (PD-L1 CPS) was higher in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) than in those with adeno or mucinous types (P=0.020). HER2 receptor expression of 2+ and 3+ were identified in 5 and 1 patients, respectively, and significantly varied based on histology (p=0.002). Among the 74 patients, single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number variations (CNVs) were identified in 60 (81.1%) and 13 patients (17.6%), respectively. The most common SNVs were PIK3CA, TP53, STK11, FAT1, and FBXW7 mutations. Mutations in PIK3CA, with two hotspot mutations, were frequently observed in patients with SCC histology, whereas mutations in TP53 were frequently observed in patients with non-SCC histology. Additionally, variations in FAT1 were exclusively identified in patients with SCC histology. Mutations in homologous recombination repair-associated genes were identified in 18 patients (24.3%). The most frequent CNV alteration was CCNE1 amplification. Moreover, among the 36 patients who underwent NGS and received immunotherapy, the tumor mutational burden and microsatellite instability were significantly correlated with immunotherapy duration. During this timeframe, 73 patients received pembrolizumab monotherapy, among whom a small portion showed a durable response.

Conclusion

Comprehensive genomic and IHC profiling may help identify potential candidates for targeted immunotherapy in patients with cervical cancer.

The Day-To-Day Practice of MMR and MSI Assessment in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: What We Know and What We Still Need to Explore

BACKGROUND

The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system is a highly preserved protein complex recognizing short insertions, short deletions, and single base mismatches during DNA replication and recombination. MMR protein status is identified using immunohistochemistry. Deficit in one or more MMR proteins, configuring deficient MMR status (dMMR), leads to frameshift mutations particularly clustered in microsatellite repeats. Thus, microsatellite instability (MSI) is the epiphenomenon of dMMR. In colorectal cancer (CRC), MMR/MSI status is a biomarker with prognostic and predictive value of resistance to 5-fluorouracil and response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

SUMMARY

In this Review, we describe the challenges the practicing pathologist may face in relation to the assessment of MMR/MSI status and any open issues which still need to be addressed, focusing on pre-analytic issues, pitfalls in the interpretation, and technical aspects of the different assays.

KEY MESSAGES

The current methods of detecting dMMR/MSI status have been optimized for CRCs, and whether these techniques can be applied to all tumor and specimen types is still not fully understood. Following the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), tissue/site agnostic drug approval of pembrolizumab for advanced/metastatic MSI tumors, MMR/MSI status in gastrointestinal tract is a common request from the oncologist. In this setting, several issues still need to be addressed, including criteria for sample adequacy.

Evaluating Multiple Next-Generation Sequencing-Derived Tumor Features to Accurately Predict DNA Mismatch Repair Status

Identifying tumor DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is important for precision medicine. Tumor features, individually and in combination, derived from whole-exome sequenced (WES) colorectal cancers (CRCs) and panel-sequenced CRCs, endometrial cancers (ECs), and sebaceous skin tumors (SSTs) were assessed for their accuracy in detecting dMMR. CRCs (n = 300) with WES, where mismatch repair status was determined by immunohistochemistry, were assessed for microsatellite instability (MSMuTect, MANTIS, MSIseq, and MSISensor), Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer tumor mutational signatures, and somatic mutation counts. A 10-fold cross-validation approach (100 repeats) evaluated the dMMR prediction accuracy for i) individual features, ii) Lasso statistical model, and iii) an additive feature combination approach. Panel-sequenced tumors (29 CRCs, 22 ECs, and 20 SSTs) were assessed for the top performing dMMR predicting features/models using these three approaches. For WES CRCs, 10 features provided >80% dMMR prediction accuracy, with MSMuTect, MSIseq, and MANTIS achieving ≥99% accuracy. The Lasso model achieved 98.3% accuracy. The additive feature approach, with three or more of six of MSMuTect, MANTIS, MSIseq, MSISensor, insertion-deletion count, or tumor mutational signature small insertion/deletion 2 + small insertion/deletion 7 achieved 99.7% accuracy. For the panel-sequenced tumors, the additive feature combination approach of three or more of six achieved accuracies of 100%, 95.5%, and 100% for CRCs, ECs, and SSTs, respectively. The microsatellite instability calling tools performed well in WES CRCs; however, an approach combining tumor features may improve dMMR prediction in both WES and panel-sequenced data across tissue types.

Microsatellite instability profiles of gastrointestinal cancers: comparison between non-colorectal and colorectal origin

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a major carcinogenic pathway with prognostic and predictive implications. The validity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based MSI testing is well established in colorectal cancer; however, the data are limited in non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancers. The aim of this study is to clarify the detailed MSI profiles of non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancers and to investigate the differences from those of colorectal cancers. MSI testing was performed using paired tumour/normal tissues of 123 mismatch repair-deficient cancers detected by immunohistochemistry including 80 non-colorectal cancers (eight oesophagogastric junction (EGJ), 57 gastric and 15 small intestine) and 43 colorectal cancers. Fragment size analysis revealed that the mean nucleotide shifts of five markers (Promega panel) were the highest in the stomach (6.4), followed by colorectum (5.7), small intestine (5.0) and EGJ cancers (mean = 4.0; P = 0.015, versus stomach). All cases showed ≥ 1 nucleotide shift in ≥ 2 markers and were considered as MSI-high. However, when the cut-off was set to ≥ 3 nucleotide shifts in ≥ 2 markers, three EGJ (37.5%), two small intestine (13.3%) and two gastric (3.5%) cancers showed false-negative results. In addition, cases with isolated loss of MSH6 or PMS2 showed smaller nucleotide shifts than those in others. MSI testing is applicable to non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancers; however, a subset can yield false-negative results due to subtle nucleotide shift in multiple markers. Analysis of paired tumour/normal tissues and careful interpretation is necessary to avoid false-negative results and ensure appropriate treatment.

High concordance rate of capillary electrophoresis workflow for microsatellite instability analysis and mismatch repair (MMR) immunostaining in colorectal carcinoma

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is the primary predictive biomarker for therapeutic efficacies of cancer immunotherapies. Establishment of the MSI detection methods with high sensitivity and accessibility is important. Because MSI is mainly caused by defects in DNA mismatch repair (MMR), immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for the MMR proteins has been widely employed to predict the responses to immunotherapies. Thus, due to the high sensitivity of PCR, the MSI-PCR analysis has also been recommended as the primary approach as MMR IHC. This study aimed to develop a sensitive and convenient platform for daily MSI-PCR services. The routine workflow used a non-labeling QIAxcel capillary electrophoresis system which did not need the fluorescence labeling of the DNA products or usage of a multi-color fluorescence reader. Furthermore, the 15 and 1000 bp size alignment markers were used to precisely detect the size of the DNA product. A cohort of 336 CRC cases was examined by MSI-PCR on the five mononucleotide MSI markers recommended by ESMO. The PCR products were analyzed in the screening gels, followed by high-resolution gel electrophoresis for confirmation if needed. In the MSI-PCR tests, 90.1% (303/336) cases showed clear major shift patterns in the screening gels, and only 33 cases had to be re-examined using the high-resolution gels. The cohort was also analyzed by MMR IHC is, which revealed 98.5% (331/336) concordance with MSI-PCR. In the five discordant cases, 4 (3 MSI-L and 1 MSS) showed MSH6 loss. Besides, one case exhibited MSI-H but no loss in the MMR IHC. Further NGS analysis, in this case, found that missense and frameshift mutations in the PMS2 and MSH6 genes occurred, respectively. In conclusion, the non-labeling MSI-PCR capillary electrophoresis revealed high concordance with the MMR IHC analysis and is cost- and time-effective. Therefore, it shall be highly applicable in clinical laboratories.

Microsatellite instability evaluation: which test to use for endometrial cancer?

AIMS

Analysis of microsatellite instability (MSI) is strongly recommended in endometrial cancer (EC) and colorectal cancer to screen for Lynch syndrome, to predict prognosis and to determine optimal treatment and follow-up. In a large monoinstitutional series of ECs, we evaluated the reliability and accuracy of Idylla assay, a rapid, fully automated system to detect MSI, and we compared its performance with two routine reference methods.

METHODS

We evaluated MSI status in 174 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded EC tissue samples using immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and Idylla assay. Samples with discordant or equivocal results were analysed with a third technique, the Promega MSI kit.

RESULTS

Idylla MSI assay and IHC were highly concordant (overall agreement: 154/170=90.59%, 95% CI 85.26% to 94.12%). However, in four samples, MMR-IHC staining was equivocal; moreover, 16 cases showed discordant results, that is, MMR deficient using IHC and microsatellite stable using Idylla. These 20 samples were reanalysed using the MSI-Promega kit, which showed the same results of Idylla assay in 18/20 cases (overall agreement: 90%, 95% CI 69.90% to 97.21%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that IHC is an efficient method to determine MMR status in ECs. However, the Idylla MSI assay is a rapid and reliable tool to define MSI status, and it could represent a valuable alternative to conventional MSI-PCR methods.

Improved NGS-based detection of microsatellite instability using tumor-only data

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a molecular signature of mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), a predictive marker of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy response. Despite its recognized pan-cancer value, most methods only support detection of this signature in colorectal cancer. In addition to the tissue-specific differences that impact the sensitivity of MSI detection in other tissues, the performance of most methods is also affected by patient ethnicity, tumor content, and other sample-specific properties. These limitations are particularly important when only tumor samples are available and restrict the performance and adoption of MSI testing. Here we introduce MSIdetect, a novel solution for NGS-based MSI detection. MSIdetect models the impact of indel burden and tumor content on read coverage at a set of homopolymer regions that we found are minimally impacted by sample-specific factors. We validated MSIdetect in 139 Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) clinical samples from colorectal and endometrial cancer as well as other more challenging tumor types, such as glioma or sebaceous adenoma or carcinoma. Based on analysis of these samples, MSIdetect displays 100% specificity and 96.3% sensitivity. Limit of detection analysis supports that MSIdetect is sensitive even in samples with relatively low tumor content and limited microsatellite instability. Finally, the results obtained using MSIdetect in tumor-only data correlate well (R=0.988) with what is obtained using tumor-normal matched pairs, demonstrating that the solution addresses the challenges posed by MSI detection from tumor-only data. The accuracy of MSI detection by MSIdetect in different cancer types coupled with the flexibility afforded by NGS-based testing will support the adoption of MSI testing in the clinical setting and increase the number of patients identified that are likely to benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Detecting mismatch repair deficiency in solid neoplasms: immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability, or both?

In managing patients with solid tumors, the value of detecting the status of tumor DNA mismatch repair function is widely recognized. Mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry and molecular microsatellite instability testing constitute the two major test modalities currently in use, yet each is associated with caveats and limitations that can be consequential. Most notably, the traditional approach of defining mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry abnormality by complete loss of staining in all tumor cells is evolving. Partial or clonal loss is becoming recognized as a manifestation of gene abnormality; in some cases, such clonal loss is associated with germline pathogenic variants. The current criteria and cutoff values for defining microsatellite instability-high are developed primarily according to colorectal tumors. Non-colorectal cases, and occasionally even colorectal tumors, that are mismatch repair-deficient by immunohistochemistry but not microsatellite instability-high by current standards are being recognized. Emerging data suggest that these immunohistochemistry abnormal / non-microsatellite instability-high cases warrant further genetic workup for Lynch syndrome detection. Whether these tumors respond to immunotherapy is a question still to be addressed. It is imperative that pathologists as well as clinicians and investigators be aware of such intricacies regarding routine immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability testing and the results they generate. This review summarizes our current understanding of the advantages and limitations of these tests and offer our view on what constitutes the most optimal strategy in test selection and how best to utilize case context to enhance the interpretation of the test results.

Integrative Genomic Tests in Clinical Oncology

Many clinical decisions in oncology practice rely on the presence or absence of an alteration in a single genetic locus, be it a pathogenic variant in a hereditary cancer gene or activating mutation in a drug target. In addition, there are integrative tests that produce continuous variables and evaluate complex characteristics of the entire tumor genome. Microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis identifies tumors with the accumulation of mutations in short repetitive nucleotide sequences. This procedure is utilized in Lynch syndrome diagnostic pipelines and for the selection of patients for immunotherapy. MSI analysis is well-established for colorectal malignancies, but its applications in other cancer types lack standardization and require additional research. Homologous repair deficiency (HRD) indicates tumor sensitivity to PARP inhibitors and some cytotoxic drugs. HRD-related "genomic scars" are manifested by a characteristic pattern of allelic imbalances, accumulation of deletions with flanking homology, and specific mutation signatures. The detection of the genetic consequences of HRD is particularly sophisticated and expensive, as it involves either whole genome sequencing (WGS) or the utilization of large next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) can be determined by whole exome sequencing (WES) or middle-throughput NGS multigene testing. Although TMB is regarded as an agnostic indicator of tumor sensitivity to immunotherapy, the clinical utility of this test is proven only for a few cancer types.

Microsatellite Instability: From the Implementation of the Detection to a Prognostic and Predictive Role in Cancers

Microsatellite instability (MSI) has been identified in several tumors arising from either germline or somatic aberration. The presence of MSI in cancer predicts the sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors. To date, the predictive role of MSI is currently used in the selection of colorectal cancer patients for immunotherapy; moreover, the expansion of clinical trials into other cancer types may elucidate the predictive value of MSI for non-colorectal tumors. In clinical practice, several assays are used for MSI testing, including immunohistochemistry (IHC), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS). In this review, we provide an overview of MSI in various cancer types, highlighting its potential predictive/prognostic role and the clinical trials performed. Finally, we focus on the comparison data between the different assays used to detect MSI in clinical practice.

The Roles of TP53 and FGFR2 in Progress Made Treating Endometrial Cancer

The morbidity and mortality caused by endometrial cancer (EC) is still rising worldwide. In recent years, a new system of tumor stratification has been proposed based on POLE-mutational status, TP53, and microsatellite stability status. The aim of the study was to analyze a vast panel on the genes potentially involved in the genesis of endometrial cancer in the Polish population. One hundred and three white female patients with confirmed endometrial cancer were enrolled on the study. We performed sequencing using the Hot Spot Illumina panel and microsatellite stability with immunohistochemistry. We confirmed a key role of the TP53 mutation in progress to high-grade EC and parallelly some role of FGFR2 mutation. Moreover, our data present a vast landscape of mutations in EC and their polymorphism. We reported the meaning of FGFR2 mutation and TP53 (high copy number) in high-grade ECs. Our observation in MSI contribution is comparable with other studies. Finally, we see a strong need for the implementation of the TCGA classification.

Genomic Validation of Endometrial Cancer Patient-Derived Xenograft Models as a Preclinical Tool

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the second most frequent gynecological cancer worldwide. Although improvements in EC classification have enabled an accurate establishment of disease prognosis, women with a high-risk or recurrent EC face a dramatic situation due to limited further treatment options. Therefore, new strategies that closely mimic the disease are required to maximize drug development success. Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are widely recognized as a physiologically relevant preclinical model. Hence, we propose to molecularly and histologically validate EC PDX models. To reveal the molecular landscape of PDXs generated from 13 EC patients, we performed histological characterization and whole-exome sequencing analysis of tumor samples. We assessed the similarity between PDXs and their corresponding patient's tumor and, additionally, to an extended cohort of EC patients obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Finally, we performed functional enrichment analysis to reveal differences in molecular pathway activation in PDX models. We demonstrated that the PDX models had a well-defined and differentiated molecular profile that matched the genomic profile described by the TCGA for each EC subtype. Thus, we validated EC PDX's potential to reliably recapitulate the majority of histologic and molecular EC features. This work highlights the importance of a thorough characterization of preclinical models for the improvement of the success rate of drug-screening assays for personalized medicine.

Idylla MSI test combined with immunohistochemistry is a valuable and cost effective strategy to search for microsatellite instable tumors of noncolorectal origin

Recent diagnostic and therapeutic progresses have increased the need of searching for microsatellite instability (MSI) in cancer samples beyond colorectal cancer (CRC) ones. The availability of the fully-automated Idylla MSI test (Biocartis), implementable easily in pathology laboratories, offers the opportunity to reconsider MSI diagnostic strategies towards rapid and in-house diagnosis. In this study, we evaluate the performances and cost-effectiveness of an in-house Idylla MSI testing in comparison with an externalized testing of about 54 non-CRC tumor samples. The Idylla MSI test concluded in valid analyses in 53/54 (98.1%) tumor samples with MSI statuses concordant with external molecular and immunohistochemical testing in 50/53 (94.3%) samples. Wrong Idylla MSI test results were obtained in 3/53 (5.7%) samples. Manual checking of microsatellite analyses results and confrontation between the results of Idylla and immunohistochemical analyses have permitted detection and correction of the discrepancies. The implementation of an in-house Idylla MSI testing for non-CRC tumors, necessarily combined with immunohistochemistry searching for MSI tumors, appeared not only valuable in terms of performances, but also in terms of cost-effectiveness without increasing the analyses-related costs but decreasing dramatically their turnaround times to one single working day.

Mismatch Repair Deficiency and Somatic Mutations in Human Sinonasal Tumors

Simple Summary

Sinonasal carcinomas are rare tumors with an overall poor prognosis. Due to limitations in local therapeutic approaches, systemic neo-adjuvant or adjuvant therapies are becoming increasingly important in order to improve patient outcome. This study aimed to examine potentially therapeutic targetable molecular alterations in different sinonasal tumors, including deficiency in mismatch repair proteins and microsatellite instability as well as driver mutations. According to our results, immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and sequencing-based panel analysis should be integrated into the diagnostics of clinically aggressive inverted sinonasal papilloma (ISP) and sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) in order to enable the therapeutic possibility of a targeted therapy.

Abstract

Due to limitations in local therapy approaches for sinonasal tumors, improvement in systemic therapies plays a pivotal role for prolongation of the patient’s survival. The aim of this study was to examine potential biomarkers, including deficiency in mismatch repair proteins (dMMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI-H) in sinonasal cancers and their precancerous lesions. A comprehensive analysis of 10 sinonasal cancer cell lines by whole exome sequencing, screening 174 sinonasal tumors by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair deficiency and next generation sequencing (NGS) of 136 tumor samples revealed a dMMR/MSI-H sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) cell line based on a somatic missense mutation in MLH1 and an overall frequency of dMMR/MSI-H SNSCC of 3.2% (4/125). Targetable EGFR mutations were found in 89.3% (25/28) of inverted sinonasal papilloma (ISP) and in 60% (6/10) of ISP-associated carcinomas. While PIK3CA and EGFR mutations were not mutually exclusive, KRAS mutated tumors were an EGFR-wildtype. The effect of potential driver mutations in FGFR2, FGFR3, BRAF, HRAS, MAP2K1, PTEN, NOTCH1 and CARD11 need further investigation. Our results suggest that biomarker testing, including MMR-IHC and NGS panel analysis, should be integrated into the diagnostics of clinically aggressive ISPs and SNSCC to assess prognosis and facilitate therapeutic decisions.

MSI testing : What's new? What should be considered?

Based on new trial data regarding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the detection of high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or underlying deficient mismatch repair protein (dMMR) is now becoming increasingly important for predicting treatment response. For the first time, a PD‑1 ICI (pembrolizumab) has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for first-line treatment of advanced (stage IV) dMMR/MSI‑H colorectal cancer (CRC). Further indications, such as dMMR/MSI‑H endometrial carcinoma (EC), have already succeeded (Dostarlimab, 2nd line treatment) and others are expected to follow before the end of 2021. The question of optimal testing in routine diagnostics should therefore be re-evaluated. Based on a consideration of the strengths and weaknesses of the widely available methods (immunohistochemistry and PCR), a test algorithm is proposed that allows quality assured, reliable, and cost-effective dMMR/MSI‑H testing. For CRC and EC, testing is therefore already possible at the primary diagnosis stage, in line with international recommendations (NICE, NCCN). The clinician is therefore enabled from the outset to consider not only the predictive but also the prognostic and predispositional implications of such a test when counseling patients and formulating treatment recommendations. As a basis for quality assurance, participation in interlaboratory comparisons and continuous documentation of results (e.g., QuIP Monitor) are strongly recommended.

Evaluation of Micro Satellite Instability and Mismatch Repair Status in Different Solid Tumors: A Multicenter Analysis in a Real World Setting

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a key role in the treatment of advanced stage colorectal cancer (CRC) patients featuring a deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) system or a high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) profile. However, beyond the established role in CRC patients, ICIs have highly proven efficacy in other solid tumors featuring MSI-H/dMMR status represented by endometrial, gastric, ovarian, prostatic, and pancreatic carcinomas (EC, GC, OC, PrC, and PaC). Our aim was to compare the concordance rates among the Idylla™ MSI test, TapeStation 4200, and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis in assessing MSI-H/dMMR status in EC, GC, OC, PrC, and PaC patients. The Sanger sequencing-based Titano MSI test was used in discordant cases. One hundred and eighty-five cases (n = 40 PrC, n = 39 GC, n = 38 OC, n = 35 PaC, and n = 33 EC) were retrospectively selected. MMR protein expression was evaluated by IHC. After DNA quality and quantity evaluations, the Idylla^TM and TapeStation 4200 platforms were adopted for the evaluation of MSI status. Remarkably, compared to IHC, the Idylla™ platform achieved a global concordance rate of 94.5% (154/163) for the microsatellite stable (MSS)/proficient MMR (pMMR) cases and 77.3% (17/22) for the MSI-H/dMMR cases. Similarly, a global concordance rate of 91.4% (149/163) and 68.2% (15/22) for MSS/pMMR and MSI-H/dMMR cases was also identified between IHC and the TapeStation 4200 microfluidic system. In addition, a global concordance of 93.1% (148/159) and 69.2% (18/26) for MSS/pMMR and MSI-H/dMMR cases was observed between the Idylla™ and TapeStation 4200 platforms. Discordant cases were analyzed using the Titano MSI kit. Overall, our data pinpointed a central role for molecular techniques in the diagnostic evaluation of dMMR/MSI-H status not only in CRC patients but also in other types of solid tumors.

Evaluation of Micro Satellite Instability and Mismatch Repair Status in Different Solid Tumors: A Multicenter Analysis in a Real World Setting

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a key role in the treatment of advanced stage colorectal cancer (CRC) patients featuring a deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) system or a high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) profile. However, beyond the established role in CRC patients, ICIs have highly proven efficacy in other solid tumors featuring MSI-H/dMMR status represented by endometrial, gastric, ovarian, prostatic, and pancreatic carcinomas (EC, GC, OC, PrC, and PaC). Our aim was to compare the concordance rates among the Idylla™ MSI test, TapeStation 4200, and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis in assessing MSI-H/dMMR status in EC, GC, OC, PrC, and PaC patients. The Sanger sequencing-based Titano MSI test was used in discordant cases. One hundred and eighty-five cases (n = 40 PrC, n = 39 GC, n = 38 OC, n = 35 PaC, and n = 33 EC) were retrospectively selected. MMR protein expression was evaluated by IHC. After DNA quality and quantity evaluations, the Idylla^TM and TapeStation 4200 platforms were adopted for the evaluation of MSI status. Remarkably, compared to IHC, the Idylla™ platform achieved a global concordance rate of 94.5% (154/163) for the microsatellite stable (MSS)/proficient MMR (pMMR) cases and 77.3% (17/22) for the MSI-H/dMMR cases. Similarly, a global concordance rate of 91.4% (149/163) and 68.2% (15/22) for MSS/pMMR and MSI-H/dMMR cases was also identified between IHC and the TapeStation 4200 microfluidic system. In addition, a global concordance of 93.1% (148/159) and 69.2% (18/26) for MSS/pMMR and MSI-H/dMMR cases was observed between the Idylla™ and TapeStation 4200 platforms. Discordant cases were analyzed using the Titano MSI kit. Overall, our data pinpointed a central role for molecular techniques in the diagnostic evaluation of dMMR/MSI-H status not only in CRC patients but also in other types of solid tumors.

[MSI testing : What is new? What should be considered? German version]

Based on new trial data regarding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the detection of high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or underlying deficient mismatch repair protein (dMMR) is now becoming increasingly important for predicting treatment response. For the first time, a PD‑1 ICI (pembrolizumab) has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for first-line treatment of advanced (stage IV) dMMR/MSI‑H colorectal cancer (CRC). Further indications, such as dMMR/MSI‑H endometrial carcinoma (EC), have already succeeded (Dostarlimab, 2nd line treatment) and others are expected to follow before the end of 2021. The question of optimal testing in routine diagnostics should therefore be re-evaluated. Based on a consideration of the strengths and weaknesses of the widely available methods (immunohistochemistry and PCR), a test algorithm is proposed that allows quality assured, reliable, and cost-effective dMMR/MSI‑H testing. For CRC and EC, testing is therefore already possible at the primary diagnosis stage, in line with international recommendations (NICE, NCCN). The clinician is therefore enabled from the outset to consider not only the predictive but also the prognostic and predispositional implications of such a test when counseling patients and formulating treatment recommendations. As a basis for quality assurance, participation in interlaboratory comparisons and continuous documentation of results (e.g., QuIP Monitor) are strongly recommended.

Predictive and Prognostic Value of Microsatellite Instability in Gynecologic Cancer (Endometrial and Ovarian)

Simple Summary

Endometrial cancers are the cancers most affected by microsatellite instability. This phenotype confers a demonstrated sensitivity to immunotherapy and in this sense is a major parameter to know in order to manage patients. Molecular biology, therefore, has an essential role in the better knowledge of these endometrial tumors. Moreover, the microsatellite instability phenotype is very poorly understood in ovarian cancer, yet it does exist. We therefore present here a review of the literature concerning microsatellite instability in gynecological cancers (endometrium and ovaries): its diagnosis, its clinical characteristics, and its therapeutic and prognostic impact.

Abstract

For endometrial cancer, a new classification is now available from ESMO, ESGO, and ESTRO based on clinical and molecular characteristics to determine adjuvant therapy. The contribution of molecular biology is major for this pathology mainly by the intermediary of deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability. Detection techniques for this phenotype have many peculiarities in gynecologic cancers (endometrial and ovarian) because it has been initially validated in colorectal cancer only. Endometrial cancer is the most common tumor with deficient mismatch repair, which is an important prognostic factor and a predictor of the benefit of adjuvant treatments. Concerning advanced stages, this phenotype is a theragnostic marker for using immunotherapy. Among ovarian cancer, microsatellite instability is less described in literature but exists, particularly in endometrioid type ovarian cancer. This review aims to provide an overview of the publications concerning deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability in endometrial and ovarian cancers, detection techniques, and clinical implications of these molecular characteristics.