1
|
Kött J, Zimmermann N, Zell T, Rünger A, Heidrich I, Geidel G, Smit DJ, Hansen I, Abeck F, Schadendorf D, Eggermont A, Puig S, Hauschild A, Gebhardt C. Sentinel lymph node risk prognostication in primary cutaneous melanoma through tissue-based profiling, potentially redefining the need for sentinel lymph node biopsy. Eur J Cancer 2024; 202:113989. [PMID: 38518535 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) is pivotal in the contemporary staging of cutaneous melanoma. In this review, we examine advanced molecular testing platforms like gene expression profiling (GEP) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) as tools for predicting the prognosis of sentinel lymph nodes. We compare these innovative approaches with traditional staging assessments. Additionally, we delve into the shared genetic and protein markers between GEP and IHC tests and their relevance to melanoma biology, exploring their prognostic and predictive characteristics. Finally, we assess alternative methods to potentially obviate the need for SLNB altogether. RECENT FINDINGS Progress in adjuvant melanoma therapy has diminished the necessity of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) while underscoring the importance of accurately identifying high-risk stage I and II melanoma patients who may benefit from additional anti-tumor interventions. The clinical application of testing through gene expression profiling (GEP) or immunohistochemistry (IHC) is gaining traction, with platforms such as DecisionDx, Merlin Assay (CP-GEP), MelaGenix GEP, and Immunoprint coming into play. Currently, extensive validation studies are in progress to incorporate routine molecular testing into clinical practice. However, due to significant methodological limitations, widespread clinical adoption of tissue-based molecular testing remains elusive at present. SUMMARY While various tissue-based molecular testing platforms have the potential to stratify the risk of sentinel lymph node positivity (SLNP), most suffer from significant methodological deficiencies, including limited sample size, lack of prospective validation, and limited correlation with established clinicopathological variables. Furthermore, the genes and proteins identified by individual gene expression profiling (GEP) or immunohistochemistry (IHC) tests exhibit minimal overlap, even when considering the most well-established melanoma mutations. However, there is hope that the ongoing prospective trial for the Merlin Assay may safely reduce the necessity for SLNB procedures if successful. Additionally, the MelaGenix GEP and Immunoprint tests could prove valuable in identifying high-risk stage I-II melanoma patients and potentially guiding their selection for adjuvant therapy, thus potentially reducing the need for SLNB. Due to the diverse study designs employed, effective comparisons between GEP or IHC tests are challenging, and to date, there is no study directly comparing the clinical utility of these respective GEP or IHC tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Kött
- University Skin Cancer Center Hamburg, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Noah Zimmermann
- University Skin Cancer Center Hamburg, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tim Zell
- University Skin Cancer Center Hamburg, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alessandra Rünger
- University Skin Cancer Center Hamburg, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Isabel Heidrich
- University Skin Cancer Center Hamburg, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Glenn Geidel
- University Skin Cancer Center Hamburg, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Daniel J Smit
- Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Inga Hansen
- University Skin Cancer Center Hamburg, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Finn Abeck
- University Skin Cancer Center Hamburg, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology & Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum Essen (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT-West), Campus Essen, Germany; Research Alliance Ruhr, Research Center One Health, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Alexander Eggermont
- Princess Máxima Center and University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CS Utrecht, the Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Technical University Munich & Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - Susana Puig
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Center on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), ISCIII, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH) Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christoffer Gebhardt
- University Skin Cancer Center Hamburg, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reschke R, Deitert B, Enk AH, Hassel JC. The role of tissue-resident memory T cells as mediators for response and toxicity in immunotherapy-treated melanoma-two sides of the same coin? Front Immunol 2024; 15:1385781. [PMID: 38562921 PMCID: PMC10982392 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1385781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM cells) have become an interesting subject of study for antitumor immunity in melanoma and other solid tumors. In the initial phases of antitumor immunity, they maintain an immune equilibrium and protect against challenges with tumor cells and the formation of primary melanomas. In metastatic settings, they are a prime target cell population for immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) because they highly express inhibitory checkpoint molecules such as PD-1, CTLA-4, or LAG-3. Once melanoma patients are treated with ICI, TRM cells residing in the tumor are reactivated and expand. Tumor killing is achieved by secreting effector molecules such as IFN-γ. However, off-target effects are also observed. Immune-related adverse events, such as those affecting barrier organs like the skin, can be mediated by ICI-induced TRM cells. Therefore, a detailed understanding of this memory T-cell type is obligatory to better guide and improve immunotherapy regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Reschke
- Department of Dermatology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Deitert
- Institute for Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alex H. Enk
- Department of Dermatology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jessica C. Hassel
- Department of Dermatology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ziemer M, Weidenthaler-Barth B, Gussek P, Pfeiffer M, Kleemann J, Bankov K, Wild PJ, Seibold S, Sureshkumar P, Nickel P, Strobel A, Werner M, Grabbe S. Analytical Validation of an Immunohistochemical 7-Biomarker Prognostic Assay (immunoprint ®) for Early-Stage Cutaneous Melanoma in Archival Tissue of Patients with AJCC v8 T2-T3 Disease. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3096. [PMID: 37835839 PMCID: PMC10572486 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13193096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Selected patients with early-stage melanoma have a "hidden high risk" of poor oncologic outcomes. They might benefit from clinical trials, and ultimately, if warranted by trial results, judicious everyday use of adjuvant therapy. A promising tool to identify these individuals is the immunoprint® assay. This immunohistochemical 7-biomarker prognostic test was clinically validated in three independent cohorts (N = 762) to classify early-stage patients as high-risk or low-risk regarding melanoma recurrence and mortality. Using College of American Pathologists (CAP) recommendations, we analytically validated this assay in primary melanoma specimens (N = 20 patients). We assessed assay precision by determining consistency of risk classification under repeated identical conditions (repeatability) or across varying conditions (reproducibility), involving separate assay runs, operators (laboratory scientists), and/or observers (e.g., dermatopathologists). Reference classification was followed by five analytical validation phases: intra-run/intra-operator, intra-observer, inter-run, inter-operator, and inter-observer. Concordance of classifications in each phase was assessed via Fleiss' kappa (primary endpoint) and percent agreement (secondary endpoint). Seven-marker signature classification demonstrated high consistency across validation categories (Fleiss' kappa 0.864-1.000; overall percent agreement 95-100%), in 9/10 cases, exceeding, and in 1/10 cases, closely approaching, CAP's recommended 0.9 level. The 7-marker assay has now been verified to provide excellent repeatability, reproducibility, and precision, besides having been clinically validated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjana Ziemer
- Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venereology, University Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Beate Weidenthaler-Barth
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (B.W.-B.); (M.P.); (S.G.)
| | - Philipp Gussek
- Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venereology, University Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Maja Pfeiffer
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (B.W.-B.); (M.P.); (S.G.)
| | - Johannes Kleemann
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Katrin Bankov
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; (K.B.); (P.J.W.)
| | - Peter J. Wild
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; (K.B.); (P.J.W.)
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Silke Seibold
- Synvie GmbH, 80992 Munich, Germany; (S.S.); (P.S.); (P.N.); (A.S.); (M.W.)
| | | | - Patricia Nickel
- Synvie GmbH, 80992 Munich, Germany; (S.S.); (P.S.); (P.N.); (A.S.); (M.W.)
| | - Anton Strobel
- Synvie GmbH, 80992 Munich, Germany; (S.S.); (P.S.); (P.N.); (A.S.); (M.W.)
| | - Markus Werner
- Synvie GmbH, 80992 Munich, Germany; (S.S.); (P.S.); (P.N.); (A.S.); (M.W.)
| | - Stephan Grabbe
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (B.W.-B.); (M.P.); (S.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Meyer S, Buser L, Haferkamp S, Berneburg M, Maisch T, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Pauer A, Vogt T, Garbe C. Identification of high-risk patients with a seven-biomarker prognostic signature for adjuvant treatment trial recruitment in American Joint Committee on Cancer v8 stage I-IIA cutaneous melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2023; 182:77-86. [PMID: 36753835 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many patients with resected American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) early-stage cutaneous melanoma nonetheless die of melanoma; additional risk stratification approaches are needed. PATIENTS AND METHODS Using prospectively-collected whole-tissue sections, we assessed in consecutive stage I-IIA patients (N = 439), a previously-validated, immunohistochemistry-based, 7-biomarker signature to prognosticate disease-free survival (DFS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS; primary end-point) and overall survival (OS), independent of AJCC classification. RESULTS Seven-marker signature testing designated 25.1% of patients (110/439) as high-risk (stage IA, 13.3% [43/323], IB, 53.2% [42/79], and IIA, 67.6% [25/37]). A Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated high-risk patients to have significantly worse DFS, MSS and OS versus low-risk counterparts (P < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression modelling also including key clinicopathological/demographic factors, 7-marker signature data independently prognosticated the studied end-points. Models with the 7-marker signature risk category plus clinicopathological/demographic covariates substantially outperformed models with clinicopathological/demographic variables alone in predicting all studied outcomes (areas under the receiver operator characteristic curve 74.1% versus 68.4% for DFS, 81.5% versus 71.2% for MSS, 80.9% versus 73.0% for OS; absolute differences 5.7%, 10.3% and 7.9%, respectively, favouring 7-marker signature risk category-containing models). CONCLUSION In patients with AJCC early-stage disease, the 7-marker signature reliably prognosticates melanoma-related outcomes, independent of AJCC classification, and provides a valuable complement to clinicopathological/demographic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Meyer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Lorenz Buser
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital of Zürich, University of Zürich, Schmelzbergstrasse 12, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
| | - Sebastian Haferkamp
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Mark Berneburg
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Tim Maisch
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
- Tumour Center Regensburg, Institute for Quality Assurance and Healthcare Research, University of Regensburg, Am BioPark 9, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Armin Pauer
- Tumour Center Regensburg, Institute for Quality Assurance and Healthcare Research, University of Regensburg, Am BioPark 9, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Thomas Vogt
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology, Allergology, University Hospital Saarland, Kirrbergerstraße, 66424 Homburg, Germany.
| | - Claus Garbe
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kitrell BM, Blue ED, Siller A, Lobl MB, Evans TD, Whitley MJ, Wysong A. Gene Expression Profiles in Cutaneous Oncology. Dermatol Clin 2022; 41:89-99. [DOI: 10.1016/j.det.2022.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
6
|
Risk Stratification and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Late Recurrence of Melanoma (>10 Years). J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11072026. [PMID: 35407631 PMCID: PMC9000041 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11072026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Most patients with high-risk melanomas develop metastasis within the first few years after diagnosis. However, late recurrence of melanoma is seen in patients that metastasize more than 10 years after the primary diagnosis; a metastasis after 15 years is considered an ultra-late recurrence. It is critical to better understand the clinical and biological characteristics of this subset of melanoma patients in order to offer an individual treatment plan and prevent metastasis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed melanoma patients with recurrence ≥10 years after a primary diagnosis documented between 1993 and 2012 at the skin cancer center of the University Medical Center Leipzig, Germany. We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature and compared the results with our data. Available archived primary melanoma tissue was investigated with a seven-marker immunohistochemical signature (immunoprint®) previously validated to reliably identify high-risk patients within stages IB-III. Results: Out of 36 analyzed patients, a third metastasized ultra-late (≥15 years). The mean age at initial diagnosis was 51 years, with women being diagnosed comparatively younger than men. The largest proportion of patients with late recurrence had primary melanomas located on the trunk. The immunoprint® signature of the available primary melanomas allowed the accurate prediction of a high risk. However, it is difficult to draw a definitive conclusion from the small number of cases that could be analyzed with immunoprint® (n = 2) in this study. Apart from the primary tumor characteristics, the laboratory values at time of metastasis, comorbidities and outcome are also shown. Conclusion: Late and ultra-late recurrent melanomas seem not to differ from melanomas in general, apart from a distinctly higher proportion of lower leg localizations in ultra-late recurrent melanomas. The immunoprint® signature may help to identify high-risk primary tumors at the time of initial diagnosis. However, apart from the risk profile of the primary tumor, it seems that individual immune surveillance can control residual tumor cells for more than a decade. Advanced age and increasing comorbidities may contribute to a disturbed immunological balance.
Collapse
|