1
|
Whitmore L, Mackay RI, van Herk M, Korysko P, Farabolini W, Malyzhenkov A, Corsini R, Jones RM. CERN-based experiments and Monte-Carlo studies on focused dose delivery with very high energy electron (VHEE) beams for radiotherapy applications. Sci Rep 2024; 14:11120. [PMID: 38750131 PMCID: PMC11096185 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60997-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Very High Energy Electron (VHEE) beams are a promising alternative to conventional radiotherapy due to their highly penetrating nature and their applicability as a modality for FLASH (ultra-high dose-rate) radiotherapy. The dose distributions due to VHEE need to be optimised; one option is through the use of quadrupole magnets to focus the beam, reducing the dose to healthy tissue and allowing for targeted dose delivery at conventional or FLASH dose-rates. This paper presents an in depth exploration of the focusing achievable at the current CLEAR (CERN Linear Electron Accelerator for Research) facility, for beam energies >200 MeV. A shorter, more optimal quadrupole setup was also investigated using the TOPAS code in Monte Carlo simulations, with dimensions and beam parameters more appropriate to a clinical situation. This work provides insight into how a focused VHEE radiotherapy beam delivery system might be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Whitmore
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- The Cockcroft Institute of Science and Technology, Daresbury, UK
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - R I Mackay
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - M van Herk
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - P Korysko
- Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- CERN, 1211, Geneva 23, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - R M Jones
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
- The Cockcroft Institute of Science and Technology, Daresbury, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lövgren N, Fagerström Kristensen I, Petersson K. Feasibility and constraints of Bragg peak FLASH proton therapy treatment planning. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1369065. [PMID: 38737902 PMCID: PMC11082391 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1369065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction FLASH proton therapy (FLASH-PT) requires ultra-high dose rate (≥ 40 Gy/s) protons to be delivered in a short timescale whilst conforming to a patient-specific target. This study investigates the feasibility and constraints of Bragg peak FLASH-PT treatment planning, and compares the in silico results produced to plans for intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Materials and method Bragg peak FLASH-PT and IMPT treatment plans were generated for bone (n=3), brain (n=3), and lung (n=4) targets using the MIROpt research treatment planning system and the Conformal FLASH library developed by Applications SA from the open-source version of UCLouvain. FLASH-PT beams were simulated using monoenergetic spot-scanned protons traversing through a conformal energy modulator, a range shifter, and an aperture. A dose rate constraint of ≥ 40 Gy/s was included in each FLASH-PT plan optimisation. Results Space limitations in the FLASH-PT adapted beam nozzle imposed a maximum target width constraint, excluding 4 cases from the study. FLASH-PT plans did not satisfy the imposed target dose constraints (D95% ≥ 95% and D2%≤ 105%) but achieved clinically acceptable doses to organs at risk (OARs). IMPT plans adhered to all target and OAR dose constraints. FLASH-PT plans showed a reduction in both target homogeneity (p < 0.001) and dose conformity (non-significant) compared to IMPT. Conclusion Without accounting for a sparing effect, IMPT plans were superior in target coverage, dose conformity, target homogeneity, and OAR sparing compared to FLASH-PT. Further research is warranted in treatment planning optimisation and beam delivery for clinical implementation of Bragg peak FLASH-PT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Lövgren
- Department of Oncology, Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ingrid Fagerström Kristensen
- Clinical Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Department of Oncology, Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rank L, Dogan O, Kopp B, Mein S, Verona-Rinati G, Kranzer R, Marinelli M, Mairani A, Tessonnier T. Development and benchmarking of a dose rate engine for raster-scanned FLASH helium ions. Med Phys 2024; 51:2251-2262. [PMID: 37847027 PMCID: PMC10939952 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy with charged particles at high dose and ultra-high dose rate (uHDR) is a promising technique to further increase the therapeutic index of patient treatments. Dose rate is a key quantity to predict the so-called FLASH effect at uHDR settings. However, recent works introduced varying calculation models to report dose rate, which is susceptible to the delivery method, scanning path (in active beam delivery) and beam intensity. PURPOSE This work introduces an analytical dose rate calculation engine for raster scanned charged particle beams that is able to predict dose rate from the irradiation plan and recorded beam intensity. The importance of standardized dose rate calculation methods is explored here. METHODS Dose is obtained with an analytical pencil beam algorithm, using pre-calculated databases for integrated depth dose distributions and lateral penumbra. Dose rate is then calculated by combining dose information with the respective particle fluence (i.e., time information) using three dose-rate-calculation models (mean, instantaneous, and threshold-based). Dose rate predictions for all three models are compared to uHDR helium ion beam (145.7 MeV/u, range in water of approximatively 14.6 cm) measurements performed at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT) with a diamond-detector prototype. Three scanning patterns (scanned or snake-like) and four field sizes are used to investigate the dose rate differences. RESULTS Dose rate measurements were in good agreement with in-silico generated distributions using the here introduced engine. Relative differences in dose rate were below 10% for varying depths in water, from 2.3 to 14.8 cm, as well as laterally in a near Bragg peak area. In the entrance channel of the helium ion beam, dose rates were predicted within 7% on average for varying irradiated field sizes and scanning patterns. Large differences in absolute dose rate values were observed for varying calculation methods. For raster-scanned irradiations, the deviation between mean and threshold-based dose rate at the investigated point was found to increase with the field size up to 63% for a 10 mm × 10 mm field, while no significant differences were observed for snake-like scanning paths. CONCLUSIONS This work introduces the first dose rate calculation engine benchmarked to instantaneous dose rate, enabling dose rate predictions for physical and biophysical experiments. Dose rate is greatly affected by varying particle fluence, scanning path, and calculation method, highlighting the need for a consensus among the FLASH community on how to calculate and report dose rate in the future. The here introduced engine could help provide the necessary details for the analysis of the sparing effect and uHDR conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luisa Rank
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Faculty of Physics, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Ozan Dogan
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg University, Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Kopp
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stewart Mein
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Rafael Kranzer
- PTW-Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Marco Marinelli
- Industrial Engineering Department, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Physics, National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zeng Y, Li H, Wang W, Liu X, Qin B, Dai S, Pang B, Liu M, Quan H, Yang K, Chang Y, Yang Z. Feasibility study of multiple-energy Bragg peak proton FLASH on a superconducting gantry with large momentum acceptance. Med Phys 2024; 51:2164-2174. [PMID: 38169535 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While the Bragg peak proton beam (BP) is capable of superior target conformity and organs-at-risk sparing than the transmission proton beam (TB), its efficacy in FLASH-RT is hindered by both a slow energy switching process and the beam current. A universal range shifter (URS) can pull back the high-energy proton beam while preserving the beam current. Meanwhile, a superconducting gantry with large momentum acceptance (LMA-SC gantry) enables fast energy switching. PURPOSE This study explores the feasibility of multiple-energy BP FLASH-RT on the LMA-SC gantry. METHOD AND MATERIALS A simultaneous dose and spot map optimization algorithm was developed for BP FLASH-RT treatment planning to improve the dose delivery efficiency. The URS was designed to be 0-27 cm thick, with 1 cm per step. BP plans using the URS were optimized using single-field optimization (SFO) and multiple-field optimization (MFO) for ten prostate cancer patients and ten lung cancer patients. The plan delivery parameters, dose, and dose rate metrics of BP plans were compared to those of TB plans using the parameters of the LMA-SC gantry. RESULTS Compared to TB plans, BP plans significantly reduced MUs by 42.7% (P < 0.001) with SFO and 33.3% (P < 0.001) with MFO for prostate cases. For lung cases, the reduction in MUs was 56.8% (P < 0.001) with SFO and 36.4% (P < 0.001) with MFO. BP plans also outperformed TB plans by reducing mean normal tissue doses. BP-SFO plans achieved a reduction of 56.7% (P < 0.001) for prostate cases and 57.7% (P < 0.001) for lung cases, while BP-MFO plans achieved a reduction of 54.2% (P < 0.001) for the prostate case and 40.0% (P < 0.001) for lung cases. For both TB and BP plans, normal tissues in prostate and lung cases received 100.0% FLASH dose rate coverage (>40 Gy/s). CONCLUSIONS By utilizing the URS and the LMA-SC gantry, it is possible to perform multiple-energy BP FLASH-RT, resulting in better normal tissue sparing, as compared to TB plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiling Zeng
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Wuhan, China
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Wei Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Engineering and Technology, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xu Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Engineering and Technology, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Bin Qin
- State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Engineering and Technology, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Shuyang Dai
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, P. R. China
| | - Bo Pang
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Muyu Liu
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Hong Quan
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Kunyu Yang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yu Chang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhiyong Yang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Precision Radiation Oncology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kaulfers T, Lattery G, Cheng C, Zhao X, Selvaraj B, Wu H, Chhabra AM, Choi JI, Lin H, Simone CB, Hasan S, Kang M, Chang J. Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Bragg Peak Conformal FLASH in Prostate Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:798. [PMID: 38398188 PMCID: PMC10886659 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Bragg peak FLASH radiotherapy (RT) uses a distal tracking method to eliminate exit doses and can achieve superior OAR sparing. This study explores the application of this novel method in stereotactic body radiotherapy prostate FLASH-RT. An in-house platform was developed to enable intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) planning using a single-energy Bragg peak distal tracking method. The patients involved in the study were previously treated with proton stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using the pencil beam scanning (PBS) technique to 40 Gy in five fractions. FLASH plans were optimized using a four-beam arrangement to generate a dose distribution similar to the conventional opposing beams. All of the beams had a small angle of two degrees from the lateral direction to increase the dosimetry quality. Dose metrics were compared between the conventional PBS and the Bragg peak FLASH plans. The dose rate histogram (DRVH) and FLASH metrics of 40 Gy/s coverage (V40Gy/s) were investigated for the Bragg peak plans. There was no significant difference between the clinical and Bragg peak plans in rectum, bladder, femur heads, large bowel, and penile bulb dose metrics, except for Dmax. For the CTV, the FLASH plans resulted in a higher Dmax than the clinical plans (116.9% vs. 103.3%). For the rectum, the V40Gy/s reached 94% and 93% for 1 Gy dose thresholds in composite and single-field evaluations, respectively. Additionally, the FLASH ratio reached close to 100% after the application of the 5 Gy threshold in composite dose rate assessment. In conclusion, the Bragg peak distal tracking method can yield comparable plan quality in most OARs while preserving sufficient FLASH dose rate coverage, demonstrating that the ultra-high dose technique can be applied in prostate FLASH SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Kaulfers
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA; (T.K.); (G.L.)
| | - Grant Lattery
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA; (T.K.); (G.L.)
| | - Chingyun Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA;
| | - Xingyi Zhao
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Balaji Selvaraj
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Hui Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China;
| | - Arpit M. Chhabra
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Jehee Isabelle Choi
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Charles B. Simone
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Shaakir Hasan
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Minglei Kang
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Jenghwa Chang
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA; (T.K.); (G.L.)
- Northwell, 2000 Marcus Ave, Suite 300, New Hyde Park, NY 11042, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tessonnier T, Verona-Rinati G, Rank L, Kranzer R, Mairani A, Marinelli M. Diamond detectors for dose and instantaneous dose-rate measurements for ultra-high dose-rate scanned helium ion beams. Med Phys 2024; 51:1450-1459. [PMID: 37742343 PMCID: PMC10922163 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The possible emergence of the FLASH effect-the sparing of normal tissue while maintaining tumor control-after irradiations at dose-rates exceeding several tens of Gy per second, has recently spurred a surge of studies attempting to characterize and rationalize the phenomenon. Investigating and reporting the dose and instantaneous dose-rate of ultra-high dose-rate (UHDR) particle radiotherapy beams is crucial for understanding and assessing the FLASH effect, towards pre-clinical application and quality assurance programs. PURPOSE The purpose of the present work is to investigate a novel diamond-based detector system for dose and instantaneous dose-rate measurements in UHDR particle beams. METHODS Two types of diamond detectors, a microDiamond (PTW 60019) and a diamond detector prototype specifically designed for operation in UHDR beams (flashDiamond), and two different readout electronic chains, were investigated for absorbed dose and instantaneous dose-rate measurements. The detectors were irradiated with a helium beam of 145.7 MeV/u under conventional and UHDR delivery. Dose-rate delivery records by the monitoring ionization chamber and diamond detectors were studied for single spot irradiations. Dose linearity at 5 cm depth and in-depth dose response from 2 to 16 cm were investigated for both measurement chains and both detectors in a water tank. Measurements with cylindrical and plane-parallel ionization chambers as well as Monte-Carlo simulations were performed for comparisons. RESULTS Diamond detectors allowed for recording the temporal structure of the beam, in good agreement with the one obtained by the monitoring ionization chamber. A better time resolution of the order of few μs was observed as compared to the approximately 50 μs of the monitoring ionization chamber. Both diamonds detectors show an excellent linearity response in both delivery modalities. Dose values derived by integrating the measured instantaneous dose-rates are in very good agreement with the ones obtained by the standard electrometer readings. Bragg peak curves confirmed the consistency of the charge measurements by the two systems. CONCLUSIONS The proposed novel dosimetric system allows for a detailed investigation of the temporal evolution of UHDR beams. As a result, reliable and accurate determinations of dose and instantaneous dose-rate are possible, both required for a comprehensive characterization of UHDR beams and relevant for FLASH effect assessment in clinical treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Luisa Rank
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Rafael Kranzer
- PTW-Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Physics department, National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Marco Marinelli
- Industrial Engineering Department, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Knäusl B, Belotti G, Bertholet J, Daartz J, Flampouri S, Hoogeman M, Knopf AC, Lin H, Moerman A, Paganelli C, Rucinski A, Schulte R, Shimizu S, Stützer K, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Czerska K. A review of the clinical introduction of 4D particle therapy research concepts. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100535. [PMID: 38298885 PMCID: PMC10828898 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Many 4D particle therapy research concepts have been recently translated into clinics, however, remaining substantial differences depend on the indication and institute-related aspects. This work aims to summarise current state-of-the-art 4D particle therapy technology and outline a roadmap for future research and developments. Material and methods This review focused on the clinical implementation of 4D approaches for imaging, treatment planning, delivery and evaluation based on the 2021 and 2022 4D Treatment Workshops for Particle Therapy as well as a review of the most recent surveys, guidelines and scientific papers dedicated to this topic. Results Available technological capabilities for motion surveillance and compensation determined the course of each 4D particle treatment. 4D motion management, delivery techniques and strategies including imaging were diverse and depended on many factors. These included aspects of motion amplitude, tumour location, as well as accelerator technology driving the necessity of centre-specific dosimetric validation. Novel methodologies for X-ray based image processing and MRI for real-time tumour tracking and motion management were shown to have a large potential for online and offline adaptation schemes compensating for potential anatomical changes over the treatment course. The latest research developments were dominated by particle imaging, artificial intelligence methods and FLASH adding another level of complexity but also opportunities in the context of 4D treatments. Conclusion This review showed that the rapid technological advances in radiation oncology together with the available intrafractional motion management and adaptive strategies paved the way towards clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Knäusl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gabriele Belotti
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Juliane Daartz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Mischa Hoogeman
- Department of Medical Physics & Informatics, HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Antje C Knopf
- Institut für Medizintechnik und Medizininformatik Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW, Muttenz, Switzerland
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Astrid Moerman
- Department of Medical Physics & Informatics, HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Chiara Paganelli
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Antoni Rucinski
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland
| | - Reinhard Schulte
- Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University
| | - Shing Shimizu
- Department of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kristin Stützer
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology – OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ye Zhang
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Katarzyna Czerska
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mascia A, McCauley S, Speth J, Nunez SA, Boivin G, Vilalta M, Sharma RA, Perentesis JP, Sertorio M. Impact of Multiple Beams on the FLASH Effect in Soft Tissue and Skin in Mice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:253-261. [PMID: 37541394 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE FLASH proton pencil beam scanning (p-PBS) showed a reduction in mouse skin toxicity and fibrosis when delivered as a single, uninterrupted, high-dose fraction. Clinical p-PBS treatment usually requires multiple beams to achieve good conformality, and these beams are separated by minutes to allow patient and equipment repositioning. We evaluate the impact of multibeam versus single-beam proton radiation on the FLASH sparing effect on skin toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS The right hind leg of 10-week-old female C57Bl/6j mice was irradiated using a Varian ProBeam proton beam scanning gantry system at conventional (1 Gy/s) or FLASH (100 Gy/s) average field dose rate. We scored the skin toxicity after different doses for 7 weeks. The treatment was delivered as 1, 2, or 3 equal beams with an interruption of 2 minutes. For each beam delivery, the equipment remained in the same position so that there was a full overlap of beams administered. RESULTS Single-beam delivery confirmed a benefit for p-PBS FLASH in this model at 30, 35, and 40 Gy. At 30 and 35 Gy, a single beam interruption of 2 minutes (2 × 15 Gy or 2 × 17.5 Gy) reduced the FLASH sparing effect, which remained significant (P < .001). However, 2 interruptions (3 × 10 Gy or 3 × 11.6 Gy) abrogated the normal tissue sparing effect. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that the FLASH sparing effect in areas of beam overlap can be compromised by interruptions in delivery time. Time gap between overlapping beams and spatial arrangement of the delivered beams are important parameters for FLASH studies. The effect of multibeam needs to be studied on different organs of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Mascia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Shelby McCauley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Joseph Speth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Stefanno Alarcon Nunez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Gael Boivin
- Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company, Palo Alto, California
| | - Marta Vilalta
- Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company, Palo Alto, California
| | - Ricky A Sharma
- Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company, Palo Alto, California
| | | | - Mathieu Sertorio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liu G, Zhao L, Li X, Zhang S, Dai S, Lu X, Ding X. A Novel Ultrahigh-Dose-Rate Proton Therapy Technology: Spot-Scanning Proton Arc Therapy + FLASH (SPLASH). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:730-737. [PMID: 37196836 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To take full advantage of FLASH dose rate (40 Gy/s) and high-dose conformity, we introduce a novel optimization and delivery technique, the spot-scanning proton arc therapy (SPArc) + FLASH (SPLASH). METHODS AND MATERIALS SPLASH framework was implemented in an open-source proton planning platform (MatRad, Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center). It optimizes with the clinical dose-volume constraint based on dose distribution and the dose-average dose rate by minimizing the monitor unit constraint on spot weight and accelerator beam current sequentially, enabling the first dynamic arc therapy with voxel-based FLASH dose rate. This new optimization framework minimizes the overall cost function value combined with plan quality and voxel-based dose-rate constraints. Three representative cases (brain, liver, and prostate cancer) were used for testing purposes. Dose-volume histogram, dose-rate-volume histogram, and dose-rate map were compared among intensity modulated proton radiation therapy (IMPT), SPArc, and SPLASH. RESULTS SPLASH/SPArc could offer superior plan quality over IMPT in terms of dose conformity. The dose-rate-volume histogram results indicated SPLASH could significantly improve V40 Gy/s in the target and region of interest for all tested cases compared with SPArc and IMPT. The optimal beam current per spot is simultaneously generated, which is within the existing proton machine specifications in the research version (<200 nA). CONCLUSIONS SPLASH offers the first voxel-based ultradose-rate and high-dose conformity treatment using proton beam therapy. Such a technique has the potential to fit the needs of a broad range of disease sites and simplify clinical workflow without applying a patient-specific ridge filter, which has never before been demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gang Liu
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430023 China.
| | - Lewei Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Xiaoqiang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Sheng Zhang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430023 China.
| | - Shuyang Dai
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072 China
| | - Xiliang Lu
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072 China
| | - Xuanfeng Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lattery G, Kaulfers T, Cheng C, Zhao X, Selvaraj B, Lin H, Simone CB, Choi JI, Chang J, Kang M. Pencil Beam Scanning Bragg Peak FLASH Technique for Ultra-High Dose Rate Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4560. [PMID: 37760528 PMCID: PMC10527307 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Bragg peak FLASH-RT can deliver highly conformal treatment and potentially offer improved normal tissue protection for radiotherapy patients. This study focused on developing ultra-high dose rate (≥40 Gy × RBE/s) intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for hypofractionated treatment of early-stage breast cancer. A novel tracking technique was developed to enable pencil beaming scanning (PBS) of single-energy protons to adapt the Bragg peak (BP) to the target distally. Standard-of-care PBS treatment plans of consecutively treated early-stage breast cancer patients using multiple energy layers were reoptimized using this technique, and dose metrics were compared between single-energy layer BP FLASH and conventional IMPT plans. FLASH dose rate coverage by volume (V40Gy/s) was also evaluated for the FLASH sparing effect. Distal tracking can precisely stop BP at the target distal edge. All plans (n = 10) achieved conformal IMPT-like dose distributions under clinical machine parameters. No statistically significant differences were observed in any dose metrics for heart, ipsilateral lung, most ipsilateral breast, and CTV metrics (p > 0.05 for all). Conventional plans yielded slightly superior target and skin dose uniformities with 4.5% and 12.9% lower dose maxes, respectively. FLASH-RT plans reached 46.7% and 61.9% average-dose rate FLASH coverage for tissues receiving more than 1 and 5 Gy plan dose total under the 250 minimum MU condition. Bragg peak FLASH-RT techniques achieved comparable plan quality to conventional IMPT while reaching adequate dose rate ratios, demonstrating the feasibility of early-stage breast cancer clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grant Lattery
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hofstra University, 1000 Hempstead Turnpike, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA; (G.L.); (T.K.)
| | - Tyler Kaulfers
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hofstra University, 1000 Hempstead Turnpike, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA; (G.L.); (T.K.)
| | - Chingyun Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA;
| | - Xingyi Zhao
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (B.S.); (H.L.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.)
| | - Balaji Selvaraj
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (B.S.); (H.L.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.)
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (B.S.); (H.L.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.)
| | - Charles B. Simone
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (B.S.); (H.L.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.)
| | - J. Isabelle Choi
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (B.S.); (H.L.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.)
| | - Jenghwa Chang
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hofstra University, 1000 Hempstead Turnpike, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA; (G.L.); (T.K.)
- Radiation Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 450 Lakeville Road, Lake Success, NY 11042, USA
| | - Minglei Kang
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (B.S.); (H.L.); (C.B.S.II); (J.I.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aylward JD, Henthorn N, Manger S, Warmenhoven JW, Merchant MJ, Taylor MJ, Mackay RI, Kirkby KJ. Characterisation of the UK high energy proton research beamline for high and ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) irradiation. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2023; 9:055032. [PMID: 37567152 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/acef25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023]
Abstract
Objective. This work sets out the capabilities of the high energy proton research beamline developed in the Christie proton therapy centre for Ultra-High Dose Rate (UHDR) irradiation and FLASH experiments. It also characterises the lower limits of UHDR operation for this Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) proton hardware.Approach. Energy dependent nozzle transmission was measured using a Faraday Cup beam collector. Spot size was measured at the reference plane using a 2D scintillation detector. Integrated depth doses (IDDs) were measured. EBT3 Gafchromic film was used to compare UHDR and conventional dose rate spots. Our beam monitor calibration methodolgy for UHDR is described. A microDiamond detector was used to determine dose rates at zref. Instantaneous depth dose rates were calculated for 70-245 MeV. PBS dose rate distributions were calculated using Folkerts and Van der Water definitions.Main results. Transmission of 7.05 ± 0.1% is achieveable corresponding to a peak instantaneous dose rate of 112.7 Gy s-1. Beam parameters are comparable in conventional and UHDR mode with a spot size ofσx= 4.6 mm,σy= 6.6 mm. Dead time in the beam monitoring electonics warrants a beam current dependent MU correction in the present configuration. Fast beam scanning of 26.4 m s-1(X) and 12.1 m s-1(Y) allows PBS dose rates of the order tens of Grays per second.Significance. UHDR delivery is possible for small field sizes and high energies enabling research into the FLASH effect with PBS protons at our facility. To our knowledge this is also the first thorough characterisation of UHDR irradiation using the hardware of this clinical accelerator at energies less than 250 MeV. The data set out in this publication can be used for designing experiments at this UK research facility and inform the possible future clinical translation of UHDR PBS proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D Aylward
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory, Keckwick Ln, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4AD, United Kingdom
| | - N Henthorn
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - S Manger
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - J W Warmenhoven
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - M J Merchant
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - M J Taylor
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory, Keckwick Ln, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4AD, United Kingdom
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - R I Mackay
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - K J Kirkby
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory, Keckwick Ln, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4AD, United Kingdom
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pennock M, Wei S, Cheng C, Lin H, Hasan S, Chhabra AM, Choi JI, Bakst RL, Kabarriti R, Simone II CB, Lee NY, Kang M, Press RH. Proton Bragg Peak FLASH Enables Organ Sparing and Ultra-High Dose-Rate Delivery: Proof of Principle in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3828. [PMID: 37568644 PMCID: PMC10417542 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS) Bragg peak FLASH combines ultra-high dose rate delivery and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. This proof-of-principle study compared dosimetry and dose rate coverage between PBS Bragg peak FLASH and PBS transmission FLASH in head and neck reirradiation. PBS Bragg peak FLASH plans were created via the highest beam single energy, range shifter, and range compensator, and were compared to PBS transmission FLASH plans for 6 GyE/fraction and 10 GyE/fraction in eight recurrent head and neck patients originally treated with quad shot reirradiation (14.8/3.7 CGE). The 6 GyE/fraction and 10 GyE/fraction plans were also created using conventional-rate intensity-modulated proton therapy techniques. PBS Bragg peak FLASH, PBS transmission FLASH, and conventional plans were compared for OAR sparing, FLASH dose rate coverage, and target coverage. All FLASH OAR V40 Gy/s dose rate coverage was 90-100% at 6 GyE and 10 GyE for both FLASH modalities. PBS Bragg peak FLASH generated dose volume histograms (DVHs) like those of conventional therapy and demonstrated improved OAR dose sparing over PBS transmission FLASH. All the modalities had similar CTV coverage. PBS Bragg peak FLASH can deliver conformal, ultra-high dose rate FLASH with a two-millisecond delivery of the minimum MU per spot. PBS Bragg peak FLASH demonstrated similar dose rate coverage to PBS transmission FLASH with improved OAR dose-sparing, which was more pronounced in the 10 GyE/fraction than in the 6 GyE/fraction. This feasibility study generates hypotheses for the benefits of FLASH in head and neck reirradiation and developing biological models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Pennock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY 10461, USA;
| | - Shouyi Wei
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Chingyun Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA;
| | - Haibo Lin
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Shaakir Hasan
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Arpit M. Chhabra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (C.B.S.II)
| | - J. Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (C.B.S.II)
| | - Richard L. Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology—Radiation Oncology Associates, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA;
| | - Rafi Kabarriti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY 10461, USA;
| | - Charles B. Simone II
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (C.B.S.II)
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Minglei Kang
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Robert H. Press
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL 33176, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ma C, Yang X, Chang CW, Liu R, Bohannon D, Lin L, Liu T, Tian S, Zhou J. Feasibility study of hybrid inverse planning with transmission beams and single-energy spread-out Bragg peaks for proton FLASH radiotherapy. Med Phys 2023; 50:3687-3700. [PMID: 36932635 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) proton planning with only transmission beams (TBs) has limitations in normal tissue sparing. The single-energy spread-out Bragg peaks (SESOBPs) of the FLASH dose rate have been demonstrated feasible for proton FLASH planning. PURPOSE To investigate the feasibility of combining TBs and SESOBPs for proton FLASH treatment. METHODS A hybrid inverse optimization method was developed to combine the TBs and SESOBPs (TB-SESOBP) for FLASH planning. The SESOBPs were generated field-by-field from spreading out the BPs by pre-designed general bar ridge filters (RFs) and placed at the central target by range shifters (RSs) to obtain a uniform dose within the target. The SESOBPs and TBs were fully placed field-by-field allowing automatic spot selection and weighting in the optimization process. A spot reduction strategy was conducted in the optimization process to push up the minimum MU/spot assuring the plan deliverability at beam current of 165 nA. The TB-SESOBP plans were validated in comparison with the TB only (TB-only) plans and the plans with the combination of TBs and BPs (TB-BP plans) regarding 3D dose and dose rate (dose-averaged dose rate) distributions for five lung cases. The FLASH dose rate coverage (V40Gy/s ) was evaluated in the structure volume receiving > 10% of the prescription dose. RESULTS Compared to the TB-only plans, the mean spinal cord D1.2cc drastically reduced by 41% (P < 0.05), the mean lung V7Gy and V7.4 Gy moderately reduced by up to 17% (P < 0.05), and the target dose homogeneity slightly increased in the TB-SESOBP plans. Comparable dose homogeneity was achieved in both TB-SESOBP and TB-BP plans. Besides, prominent improvements were achieved in lung sparing for the cases of relatively large targets by the TB-SESOBP plans compared to the TB-BP plans. The targets and the skin were fully covered with the FLASH dose rate in all three plans. For the OARs, V40Gy/s = 100% was achieved by the TB-only plans while V40Gy/s > 85% was obtained by the other two plans. CONCLUSION We have demonstrated that the hybrid TB-SESOBP planning was feasible to achieve FLASH dose rate for proton therapy. With pre-designed general bar RFs, the hybrid TB-SESOBP planning could be implemented for proton adaptive FLASH radiotherapy. As an alternative FLASH planning approach to TB-only planning, the hybrid TB-SESOBP planning has great potential in dosimetrically improving OAR sparing while maintaining high target dose homogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaoqiong Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Chih-Wei Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ruirui Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Duncan Bohannon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Liyong Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Tian Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sibo Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhang G, Zhang Z, Gao W, Quan H. Treatment planning consideration for very high-energy electron FLASH radiotherapy. Phys Med 2023; 107:102539. [PMID: 36804694 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Very high-energy electron (VHEE) can make up the insufficient treatment depth of the low-energy electron while offering an intermediate dosimetric advantage between photon and proton. Combining FLASH with VHEE, a quantitative comparison between different energies was made, with regard to plan quality, dose rate distribution (both in PTV and OAR), and total duration of treatment (beam-on time). METHODS In two patient cases (head and lung), we created the treatment plans utilizing the scanning pencil beam via the Monte Carlo simulation and a PTV-based optimization algorithm. Geant4 was used to simulate VHEE pencil beams and sizes of 0.3-5 mm defined by the full width at half maximum (FWHM). Monoenergetic beams with Gaussian distribution in x and y directions (ISOURC = 19) were used as the source of electrons. A large-scale non-linear solver (IPOPT) was used to calculate the optimal spot weights. After optimization, a quantitative comparison between different energies was made regarding treatment plan quality, dose rate distribution (both in PTV and OAR), and total beam duration. RESULTS For head (80 MeV, 100 MeV, and 120 MeV) and lung cases (100 MeV, 120 MeV, and 140 MeV), the minimum beam intensity needs to be ∼2.5 × 1011 electrons/s and ∼9.375 × 1011 electrons/s to allow > 90 % volume of PTV reaching the average dose rate (DADR) higher than 40 Gy/s. At this beam intensity (fraction dose: 10 Gy), the overall irradiation time for the head case is 5258.75 ms (80 MeV), 5149.75 ms (100 MeV), and 4976.75 ms (120 MeV), including scanning time 872.75 ms. For lung cases, this number is 1034.25 ms (100 MeV), 981.55 ms (120 MeV), and 928.15 ms (140 MeV), including scanning time 298.75 ms. The plan of higher energy always performs with a higher dose rate (both in PTV and OAR) and thereby costs less delivery time (beam-on time). CONCLUSION The study systematically investigated the currently known FLASH parameters for VHEE radiotherapy and successfully established a benchmark reference for its FLASH dose rate performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guoliang Zhang
- School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, 430072, China
| | - Zhengzhao Zhang
- Cancer Radiation Therapy Center, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, 100039, China
| | - Wenchao Gao
- Cancer Radiation Therapy Center, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, 100039, China
| | - Hong Quan
- School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, 430072, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Liu R, Charyyev S, Wahl N, Liu W, Kang M, Zhou J, Yang X, Baltazar F, Palkowitsch M, Higgins K, Dynan W, Bradley J, Lin L. An Integrated Physical Optimization Framework for Proton Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy FLASH Treatment Planning Allows Dose, Dose Rate, and Linear Energy Transfer Optimization Using Patient-Specific Ridge Filters. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023:S0360-3016(23)00097-4. [PMID: 36736634 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-specific ridge filters provide a passive means to modulate proton energy to obtain a conformal dose. Here we describe a new framework for optimization of filter design and spot maps to meet the unique demands of ultrahigh-dose-rate (FLASH) radiation therapy. We demonstrate an integrated physical optimization Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) (IPO-IMPT) approach for optimization of dose, dose-averaged dose rate (DADR), and dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd). METHODS AND MATERIALS We developed an inverse planning software to design patient-specific ridge filters that spread the Bragg peak from a fixed-energy, 250-MeV beam to a proximal beam-specific planning target volume. The software defines patient-specific ridge filter pin shapes and uses a Monte Carlo calculation engine, based on Geant4, to provide dose and LET influence matrices. Plan optimization, using matRAD, accommodates the IPO-IMPT objective function considering dose, dose rate, and LET simultaneously with minimum monitor unit constraints. The framework enables design of both regularly spaced and sparse-optimized ridge filters, from which some pins are omitted to allow faster delivery and selective LET optimization. To demonstrate the framework, we designed ridge filters for 3 example patients with lung cancer and optimized the plans using IPO-IMPT. RESULTS The IPO-IMPT framework selectively spared the organs at risk by reducing LET and increasing dose rate, relative to IMPT planning. Sparse-optimized ridge filters were superior to regularly spaced ridge filters in dose rate. Depending on which parameter is prioritized, volume distributions and histograms for dose, DADR, and LETd, using evaluation structures specific to heart, lung, and esophagus, show high levels of FLASH dose-rate coverage and/or reduced LETd, while maintaining dose coverage within the beam specific planning target volume. CONCLUSIONS This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the feasibility of using an IPO-IMPT framework to accomplish proton FLASH stereotactic body proton therapy, accounting for dose, DADR, and LETd simultaneously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruirui Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Serdar Charyyev
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Niklas Wahl
- German Cancer Research Center - DKFZ, Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology - HIRO, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Filipa Baltazar
- German Cancer Research Center - DKFZ, Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Instituto SuperiorTécnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Martina Palkowitsch
- German Cancer Research Center - DKFZ, Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology - HIRO, Heidelberg, Germany; Atominstitut, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kristin Higgins
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - William Dynan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jeffrey Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Liyong Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
McMillan MT, Kang M, Shepherd AF, Liu W, Lin L, Lin H, Simone CB. Stereotactic body proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical indications and recommendations. JOURNAL OF RADIOSURGERY AND SBRT 2023; 9:17-32. [PMID: 38029014 PMCID: PMC10681144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a standard treatment approach for early-stage lung cancer and intrathoracic oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. While local control is often excellent with this modality when delivered with photon therapy, toxicities for select patients can be significant. Proton therapy offers a unique opportunity to widen the therapeutic window when treating patients with thoracic malignancies requiring or benefitting from ultra-high doses per fraction. Thoracic proton SBRT may be particularly beneficial in cases requiring dose escalation, for tumors >5 cm, for central or ultra-central tumors, for reirradiation, in patients with interstitial lung diseases, and when combining radiation with immunotherapy. These clinical indications are detailed, along with supporting literature and clinical recommendations. Other considerations, future directions and potential benefits of proton SBRT, including sparing lymphocytes, when delivered as intensity-modulated proton therapy or as FLASH, and for the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer or in patients with homologous recombination repair deficiencies, are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew T. McMillan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Annemarie F. Shepherd
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiation Oncology, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Liyong Lin
- Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Haibo Lin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Xiao Z, Zhang Y, Speth J, Lee E, Mascia A, Lamba M. Evaluation of a conventionally shielded proton treatment room for FLASH radiotherapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:6765-6773. [PMID: 36114793 PMCID: PMC10091931 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) is the potential for a major breakthrough in cancer care, as preclinical results have shown significantly reduced toxicities to healthy tissues while maintaining excellent tumor control. However, FLASH conditions were not considered in the current proton facilities' shielding designs. The purpose of this study is to validate the adequacy of conventionally shielded proton rooms used for FLASH-RT. METHODS Clinical FLASH irradiations typically take place in a few 100 ms, orders of magnitude shorter than the response time of the wide-energy neutron detector (WENDI-II). The nozzle beam current (representing the dose rate) dependence of the WENDI-II detector response was empirically determined to stabilize with a beam current of ≤10 nA at the measurement point with the highest dose rate. A large, predefined proton transmission FLASH plan (250 MeV, 7 × 20 cm2 , 8 Gy at isocenter) was commissioned as part of a FLASH clinical trial. For purpose of this study, that field was adjusted from 250 to 244 MeV, allowing a lower beam current of 10 nA to provide reliable detector response. Radiation surveys were performed for the proton beams with/without extra beam stopper (30 × 30 × 40-cm3 solid water slabs) at 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° gantry angles. RESULTS Ambient doses were recorded at seven different locations. A 170-nA beam current, commonly used for clinical FLASH plans, was chosen to normalize the average ambient dose rate to FLASH conditions. Assuming 200-Gy/h workload (25 FLASH beams, 8 Gy/beam), annual occupational dose at controlled areas was calculated. For all gantry angles, ≤0.4 mSv/year is expected at treatment room door. The highest ambient dose, 2.46 mSv/year, ∼5% of the maximum annual permissible occupational dose, was identified at the isocenter of the adjacent treatment room with 90° gantry. CONCLUSION These survey results indicate that our conventionally shielded proton rotating gantry rooms result in acceptable occupational and public doses when the transmission FLASH beams delivered at four cardinal gantry angles based on 200-Gy/h workload assumption. These findings support that FLASH clinical trials in our conventionally shielded proton facilities can be safely implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyan Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Yongbin Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Joseph Speth
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Eunsin Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Anthony Mascia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Michael Lamba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gao Y, Liu R, Chang C, Charyyev S, Zhou J, Bradley JD, Liu T, Yang X. A potential revolution in cancer treatment: A topical review of FLASH radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13790. [PMID: 36168677 PMCID: PMC9588273 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
FLASH radiotherapy (RT) is a novel technique in which the ultrahigh dose rate (UHDR) (≥40 Gy/s) is delivered to the entire treatment volume. Recent outcomes of in vivo studies show that the UHDR RT has the potential to spare normal tissue without sacrificing tumor control. There is a growing interest in the application of FLASH RT, and the ultrahigh dose irradiation delivery has been achieved by a few experimental and modified linear accelerators. The underlying mechanism of FLASH effect is yet to be fully understood, but the oxygen depletion in normal tissue providing extra protection during FLASH irradiation is a hypothesis that attracts most attention currently. Monte Carlo simulation is playing an important role in FLASH, enabling the understanding of its dosimetry calculations and hardware design. More advanced Monte Carlo simulation tools are under development to fulfill the challenge of reproducing the radiolysis and radiobiology processes in FLASH irradiation. FLASH RT may become one of standard treatment modalities for tumor treatment in the future. This paper presents the history and status of FLASH RT studies with a focus on FLASH irradiation delivery modalities, underlying mechanism of FLASH effect, in vivo and vitro experiments, and simulation studies. Existing challenges and prospects of this novel technique are discussed in this manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Ruirui Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Chih‐Wei Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Serdar Charyyev
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Jeffrey D. Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Tian Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wei S, Lin H, Huang S, Shi C, Xiong W, Zhai H, Hu L, Yu G, Press RH, Hasan S, Chhabra AM, Choi JI, Simone CB, Kang M. Dose rate and dose robustness for proton transmission FLASH-RT treatment in lung cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:970602. [PMID: 36059710 PMCID: PMC9435957 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.970602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purposes To evaluate the plan quality and robustness of both dose and dose rate of proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) transmission FLASH delivery in lung cancer treatment. Methods and materials An in-house FLASH planning platform was used to optimize 10 lung cancer patients previously consecutively treated with proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to receive 3 and 5 transmission beams (Trx-3fds and Trx-5fds, respectively) to 34 Gy in a single fraction. Perturbation scenarios (n=12) for setup and range uncertainties (5 mm and 3.5%) were introduced, and dose-volume histogram and dose-rate-volume histogram bands were generated. Conventional proton SBRT clinical plans were used as a reference. RTOG 0915 dose metrics and 40 Gy/s dose rate coverage (V40Gy/s) were used to assess the dose and dose rate robustness. Results Trx-5fds yields a comparable iCTV D2% of 105.3%, whereas Trx-3fds resulted in inferior D2% of 111.9% to the clinical SBRT plans with D2% of 105.6% (p<0.05). Both Trx-5fds and Trx-3fds plans had slightly worse dose metrics to organs at risk than SBRT plans. Trx-5fds achieved superior dosimetry robustness for iCTV, esophagus, and spinal cord doses than both Trx-3fds and conventional SBRT plans. There was no significant difference in dose rate robustness for V40Gy/s coverage between Trx-3fds and Trx-5fds. Dose rate distribution has similar distributions to the dose when perturbation exists. Conclusion Transmission plans yield overall modestly inferior plan quality compared to the conventional proton SBRT plans but provide improved robustness and the potential for a toxicity-sparing FLASH effect. By using more beams (5- versus 3-field), both dose and dose rate robustness for transmission plans can be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shouyi Wei
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sheng Huang
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Chengyu Shi
- City of Hope, Orange County, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Weijun Xiong
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Huifang Zhai
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Lei Hu
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Gang Yu
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Minglei Kang
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
- *Correspondence: Minglei Kang,
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rahman M, Trigilio A, Franciosini G, Moeckli R, Zhang R, Böhlen TT. FLASH radiotherapy treatment planning and models for electron beams. Radiother Oncol 2022; 175:210-221. [PMID: 35964763 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The FLASH effect designates normal tissue sparing at ultra-high dose rate (UHDR, >40 Gy/s) compared to conventional dose rate (∼0.1 Gy/s) irradiation while maintaining tumour control and has the potential to improve the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy (RT). UHDR high-energy electron (HEE, 4-20 MeV) beams are currently a mainstay for investigating the clinical potential of FLASH RT for superficial tumours. In the future very-high energy electron (VHEE, 50-250 MeV) UHDR beams may be used to treat deep-seated tumours. UHDR HEE treatment planning focused at its initial stage on accurate dosimetric modelling of converted and dedicated UHDR electron RT devices for the clinical transfer of FLASH RT. VHEE treatment planning demonstrated promising dosimetric performance compared to clinical photon RT techniques in silico and was used to evaluate and optimise the design of novel VHEE RT devices. Multiple metrics and models have been proposed for a quantitative description of the FLASH effect in treatment planning, but an improved experimental characterization and understanding of the FLASH effect is needed to allow for an accurate and validated modelling of the effect in treatment planning. The importance of treatment planning for electron FLASH RT will augment as the field moves forward to treat more complex clinical indications and target sites. In this review, TPS developments in HEE and VHEE are presented considering beam models, characteristics, and future FLASH applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahbubur Rahman
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Antonio Trigilio
- Physics Department, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy; INFN National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Rome Section, Rome, Italy
| | - Gaia Franciosini
- Physics Department, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy; INFN National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Rome Section, Rome, Italy
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Rongxiao Zhang
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wei S, Lin H, Isabelle Choi J, Shi C, Simone CB, Kang M. Advanced pencil beam scanning Bragg peak FLASH-RT delivery technique can enhance lung cancer planning treatment outcomes compared to conventional multiple-energy proton PBS techniques. Radiother Oncol 2022; 175:238-247. [PMID: 35961583 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the dosimetric characteristics between an advanced proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) Bragg peak FLASH technique and conventional PBS planning technique in lung tumors. To evaluate the "FLASHness" of single-field in a multiple-field delivery scheme for a hypofractionation regimen and move a step forward to clinical application. METHODS Single-energy PBS Bragg peak FLASH treatment plans were optimized based on a novel Bragg peak tracking technique to enable Bragg peaks to stop at the distal edge of the target. Inverse treatment planning using multiple-field optimization (MFO) can achieve sufficient FLASH dose rate and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT)-equivalent dosimetric quality. The dose rate of organs-at-risk (OARs) and the target were calculated under FLASH machine parameters. A group of 10 consecutive lung SBRT patients was optimized to 34 Gy/fraction using a standard treatment of PBS technique with multiple energy layers as references to the Bragg peak plans. The dosimetric quality was compared between Bragg peak FLASH and conventional plans based on RTOG0915 dose metrics. FLASH dose rate ratios (V40Gy/s) were calculated as a metric of the FLASH-sparing effect. RESULTS For higher dose thresholds, the Bragg peak plans achieved greater V40Gy/s FLASH coverage for all major OARs. The V40Gy/s was close to 100% for all OARs when the dose thresholds were > 5 Gy for full plan and single beam evaluations. The less "FLASHness" region was associated with a low dose distribution, mainly occurring in the PBS field penumbra region. The conventional IMPT treatment plans yielded slightly superior target dose uniformity with a D2%(%) of 108.02% versus that of Bragg peak 300 MU plans of 111.81% (p < 0.01) and that of Bragg peak 1200 MU plans of 115.95% (p < 0.01). No significant difference in dose metrics was found between Bragg peak and IMPT treatment plans for the spinal cord, esophagus, heart, or lung-GTV (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION Hypofractionated lung Bragg peak plans can maintain comparable plan quality to conventional PBS while achieving sufficient FLASH dose rate coverage for major OARs for each field under the multiple-field delivery scheme. The novel Bragg peak FLASH technique has the potential to enhance lung cancer planning treatment outcomes compared to standard PBS treatment techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shouyi Wei
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA.
| | | | - Chengyu Shi
- City of Hope, Orange County, Irvine, CA 92618, USA
| | | | - Minglei Kang
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wei S, Lin H, Shi C, Xiong W, Chen CC, Huang S, Press RH, Hasan S, Chhabra AM, Choi JI, Simone CB, Kang M. Use of single-energy proton pencil beam scanning Bragg peak for intensity-modulated proton therapy FLASH treatment planning in liver hypofractionated radiation therapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:6560-6574. [PMID: 35929404 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The transmission proton FLASH technique delivers high doses to the normal tissue distal to the target, which is less conformal compared to the Bragg peak technique. To investigate FLASH RT planning using single-energy Bragg peak beams with a similar beam arrangement as clinical intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and to characterize the plan quality, dose sparing of organs-at-risk (OARs), and FLASH dose rate percentage. MATERIALS AND METHODS An in-house platform was developed to enable inverse IMPT-FLASH planning using single-energy Bragg peaks. A universal range shifter and range compensators were utilized to effectively align the Bragg peak to the distal edge of the target. Two different minimum MU settings of 400 and 800 MU/spot (Bragg-400MU and Bragg-800MU) plans were investigated on 10 consecutive hepatocellular carcinoma patients previously treated by IMPT-SBRT to evaluate the FLASH dose and dose rate coverage for OARs. The IMPT-FLASH using single-energy Bragg peaks delivered 50 Gy in 5 fractions with similar or identical beam arrangement to the clinical IMPT-SBRT plans. NRG GI003 dose constraint metrics were used. Three dose rate calculation methods, including average dose rate (ADR), dose threshold dose rate (DTDR), and dose-averaged dose rate (DADR), were all studied. RESULTS The novel spot map optimization can fulfill the inverse planning using single-energy Bragg peaks. All the Bragg peak FLASH plans achieved similar results for the liver-GTV Dmean and heart D0.5cc , compared to SBRT-IMPT. The Bragg-800MU plans resulted in 18.3% higher CTV D2cc compared with SBRT (p < 0.05), and no significant difference was found between Bragg-400MU and SBRT plans. For the CTV Dmax , SBRT plans resulted in 10.3% (p<0.01) less than Bragg-400MU plans and 16.6% (p<0.01) less than Bragg-800MU plans. The Bragg-800MU plans generally achieved higher ADR, DADR, and DTDR dose rates than Bragg-400MU plans, and DADR mostly led to the highest V40Gy/s compared to other dose rate calculation methods, whereas ADR led to the lowest. The lower dose rate portions in certain OARs are related to the lower dose deposited due to the farther distances from targets, especially in the penumbra of the beams. CONCLUSION Single-energy Bragg peak IMPT-FLASH plans eliminate the exit dose in normal tissues, maintaining comparable dose metrics to the conventional IMPT-SBRT plans while achieving a sufficient FLASH dose rate for liver cancers. This study demonstrates the feasibility of and sufficiently high dose rate when applying Bragg peak FLASH treatment for liver cancer hypofractionated FLASH therapy. The advancement of this novel method has the potential to optimize treatment for liver cancer patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shouyi Wei
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yang Y, Shi C, Chen CC, Tsai P, Kang M, Huang S, Lin CH, Chang FX, Chhabra AM, Choi JI, Tome WA, Ii CBS, Lin H. A high spatiotemporal resolution 2D strip ionization chamber array for proton pencil beam scanning FLASH radiotherapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:5464-5475. [PMID: 35593052 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Experimental measurements of 2D dose rate distributions in proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) FLASH radiation therapy (RT) are currently lacking. In this study, we characterize a newly designed 2D strip-segmented ionization chamber array (SICA) with high spatial and temporal resolution and demonstrate its applications in a modern proton PBS delivery system at both conventional and ultra-high dose rates. METHODS A dedicated research beamline of the Varian ProBeam system was employed to deliver a 250 MeV proton PBS beam with nozzle currents up to 215 nA. In the research and clinical beamlines, the spatial, temporal, and dosimetric performance of the SICA was characterized and compared with measurements using parallel-plate ion chambers (IBA PPC05 and PTW Advanced Markus chamber), a 2D scintillator camera (IBA Lynx), Gafchromic films (EBT-XD), and a Faraday Cup. A novel reconstruction approach was proposed to enable the measurement of 2D dose and dose rate distributions using such a strip-type detector. RESULTS The SICA demonstrated a position accuracy of 0.12 ± 0.02 mm at a 20 kHz sampling rate (50 μs per event) and a linearity of R2 > 0.99 for both dose and dose rate with nozzle beam currents ranging from 1 nA to 215 nA. The 2D dose comparison to the film measurement resulted in a gamma passing rate of 99.8% (2 mm/2%). A measurement-based proton PBS 2D FLASH dose rate distribution was compared to simulation results and showed a gamma passing rate of 97.3% (2 mm/2%). CONCLUSIONS The newly designed SICA demonstrated excellent spatial, temporal, and dosimetric performance and is well suited for commissioning, quality assurance (QA), and a wide range of clinical applications in proton PBS clinical and FLASH radiotherapy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - J Isabelle Choi
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wolfgang A Tome
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Charles B Simone Ii
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zhang G, Gao W, Peng H. Design of static and dynamic ridge filters for FLASH-IMPT: a simulation study. Med Phys 2022; 49:5387-5399. [PMID: 35595708 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This paper focused on the design and optimization of ridge filter-based intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), and its potential applications for FLASH. Differing from the standard pencil beam scanning (PBS) mode, no energy/layer switching is required and total treatment time can be shortened. METHODS Unique dose influence matrices were generated as a proton beam traverse through slabs of different thicknesses (i.e. modulation by different layers). To establish the references for comparison, conventional IMPT plans (single field) were created using a large-scale non-linear solver. The spot weights from the reference IMPT plans were used as inputs for optimizing the design of ridge filters. Two designs were evaluated: model A (static) and model B (dynamic). The ridge filters designs were first verified (by GEANT4 simulation) in a water phantom and then in a H&N case. Direct comparison was made between the GEANT4 simulation results of two models and their respective references, with regard to plan quality, dose-averaged dose rate (DADR), and total treatment time. RESULTS In both the water phantom and the H&N case, two models are able to modulate dose distributions with high conformity, showing no significant difference relative to the reference plans. Dose rate volume histograms (DRVHs) suggest that in order to achieve a dose rate of 40 Gy/s over 90% PTV, the beam intensity needs to be 2.5×1011 protons/s for both models. For a fraction dose of 10 Gy, the total treatment time (including both irradiation time and dead time) can be shortened by a factor of 4.9 (model A) and 6.5 (model B), relative to the reference plans. CONCLUSION Two proposed designs (both static and dynamic) can be used for PBS-IMPT requiring no layer switching. They are promising candidates for FLASH-IMPT capable of reducing treatment time and achieving high dose rates, while maintaining dose conformity simultaneously. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guoliang Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University
| | - Wenchao Gao
- Cancer Radiation Therapy Center, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital
| | - Hao Peng
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University.,ProtonSmart Inc
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
van Marlen P, Verbakel WFAR, Slotman BJ, Dahele M. Single-fraction 34Gy lung SBRT using proton transmission beams: FLASH-dose calculations and the influence of different dose-rate methods and dose/dose-rate thresholds. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100954. [PMID: 35634574 PMCID: PMC9130077 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Research suggests that in addition to the dose-rate, a dose threshold is also important for the reduction in normal tissue toxicity with similar tumor control after ultrahigh dose-rate radiation therapy (UHDR-RT). In this analysis we aimed to identify factors that might limit the ability to achieve this “FLASH”-effect in a scenario attractive for UHDR-RT (high fractional beam dose, small target, few organs-at-risk): single-fraction 34 Gy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy. Methods and Materials Clinical volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans, intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans and transmission beam (TB) plans were compared for 6 small and 1 large lung lesion. The TB-plan dose-rate was calculated using 4 methods and the FLASH-percentage (percentage of dose delivered at dose-rates ≥40/100 Gy/s and ≥4/8 Gy) was determined for various variables: a minimum spot time (minST) of 0.5/2 ms, maximum nozzle current (maxN) of 200/40 0nA, and 2 gantry current (GC) techniques (energy-layer based, spot-based [SB]). Results Based on absolute doses 5-beam TB and VMAT-plans are similar, but TB-plans have higher rib, skin, and ipsilateral lung dose than IMPT. Dose-rate calculation methods not considering scanning achieve FLASH-percentages between ∼30% to 80%, while methods considering scanning often achieve <30%. FLASH-percentages increase for lower minST/higher maxN and when using SB GC instead of energy-layer based GC, often approaching the percentage of dose exceeding the dose-threshold. For the small lesions average beam irradiation times (including scanning) varied between 0.06 to 0.31 seconds and total irradiation times between 0.28 to 1.57 seconds, for the large lesion beam times were between 0.16 to 1.47 seconds with total irradiation times of 1.09 to 5.89 seconds. Conclusions In a theoretically advantageous scenario for FLASH we found that TB-plan dosimetry was similar to that of VMAT, but inferior to that of IMPT, and that decreasing minST or using SB GC increase the estimated amount of FLASH. For the appropriate machine/delivery parameters high enough dose-rates can be achieved regardless of calculation method, meaning that a possible FLASH dose-threshold will likely be the primary limiting factor.
Collapse
|
26
|
A Universal Range Shifter and Range Compensator Can Enable Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Single-Energy Bragg Peak FLASH-RT Treatment Using Current Commercially Available Proton Systems. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:203-213. [PMID: 35101597 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Transmission beams have been proposed for ultra-high dose (or FLASH) proton planning, limiting the organ sparing potentials of proton therapy. By pulling back the ranges of the highest energy proton beams and compensating proton ranges to adapt to the target distally, the exit dose of proton beams can be eliminated to better protect organs at risk while still preserving FLASH dose rate delivery. METHOD AND MATERIALS An inverse planning tool was developed to optimize intensity modulated proton therapy using a single-energy layer for FLASH radiation therapy planning. The range pull-backs were calculated to stop single-energy proton beams at the distal edge of the target. The spot map and weights of each field were optimized to achieve a sufficient dose rate using proton beam Bragg peaks. A C-shape target in phantom, along with 6 consecutive lung cancer patients previously treated using proton stereotactic body radiation therapy were planned using this novel Bragg Peak method and also transmission technique. Dosimetry characteristics and 3-dimensional dose rate were investigated. RESULTS The minimum monitor units (MU) for transmission and Bragg peak plans were 400 MU/spot and 1200 MU/spot, respectively, corresponding to spot peak dose rates of 670 GyRBE (relative biological effectiveness) per second and 1950 GyRBE per second. Bragg peak plans yield a generally comparable target uniformity while significantly reducing dose spillage volume from the low to medium dose level. For all the 6 lung cases delivery of 34 GyRBE in 1 fraction, assessing Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0915 constraints, the lung V7GyRBE volume was reduced by up to 32% (P = .001) for Bragg peak plans. The transmission plans tended to generate 2.4% higher FLASH dose rate coverage (V40GyRBE/s) versus Bragg peak plans over the major organs at risk. However, Bragg peak plans could also reach the FLASH radiation therapy threshold of V40GyRBE/s using a higher MU/spot and sophisticated dose-rate optimization algorithm. CONCLUSIONS This first proof-of-concept study has demonstrated this novel method of combining range pull-back and powerful inverse optimization capable of achieving FLASH dose rate based on currently available machine parameters using a single-energy Bragg peak. Similar target coverage and uniformity can be maintained by Bragg peak FLASH plans while substantially improving the sparing of organs at risk compared with transmission plans.
Collapse
|
27
|
Wei S, Lin H, Choi JI, Press RH, Lazarev S, Kabarriti R, Hajj C, Hasan S, Chhabra AM, Simone CB, Kang M. FLASH Radiotherapy Using Single-Energy Proton PBS Transmission Beams for Hypofractionation Liver Cancer: Dose and Dose Rate Quantification. Front Oncol 2022; 11:813063. [PMID: 35096620 PMCID: PMC8794777 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.813063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This work aims to study the dose and ultra-high-dose rate characteristics of transmission proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) FLASH radiotherapy (RT) for hypofractionation liver cancer based on the parameters of a commercially available proton system operating under FLASH mode. METHODS AND MATERIALS An in-house treatment planning software (TPS) was developed to perform intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) FLASH-RT planning. Single-energy transmission proton PBS plans of 4.5 Gy × 15 fractions were optimized for seven consecutive hepatocellular carcinoma patients, using 2 and 5 fields combined with 1) the minimum MU/spot chosen between 100 and 400, and minimum spot time (MST) of 2 ms, and 2) the minimum MU/spot of 100, and MST of 0.5 ms, based upon considerations in target uniformities, OAR dose constraints, and OAR FLASH dose rate coverage. Then, the 3D average dose rate distribution was calculated. The dose metrics for the mean dose of Liver-GTV and other major OARs were characterized to evaluate the dose quality for the different combinations of field numbers and minimum spot times compared to that of conventional IMPT plans. Dose rate quality was evaluated using 40 Gy/s volume coverage (V40Gy/s). RESULTS All plans achieved favorable and comparable target uniformities, and target uniformity improved as the number of fields increased. For OARs, no significant dose differences were observed between plans of different field numbers and the same MST. For plans using shorter MST and the same field numbers, better sparing was generally observed in most OARs and was statistically significant for the chest wall. However, the FLASH dose rate coverage V40Gy/s was increased by 20% for 2-field plans compared to 5-field plans in most OARs with 2-ms MST, which was less evident in the 0.5-ms cases. For 2-field plans, dose metrics and V40Gy/s of select OARs have large variations due to the beam angle selection and variable distances to the targets. The transmission plans generally yielded inferior dosimetric quality to the conventional IMPT plans. CONCLUSION This is the first attempt to assess liver FLASH treatment planning and demonstrates that it is challenging for hypofractionation with smaller fractional doses (4.5 Gy/fraction). Using fewer fields can allow higher minimum MU/spot, resulting in higher OAR FLASH dose rate coverages while achieving similar plan quality compared to plans with more fields. Shorter MST can result in better plan quality and comparable or even better FLASH dose rate coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shouyi Wei
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| | | | | | | | | | - Carla Hajj
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | | | | | | | - Minglei Kang
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Yap J, De Franco A, Sheehy S. Future Developments in Charged Particle Therapy: Improving Beam Delivery for Efficiency and Efficacy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:780025. [PMID: 34956897 PMCID: PMC8697351 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.780025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The physical and clinical benefits of charged particle therapy (CPT) are well recognized. However, the availability of CPT and complete exploitation of dosimetric advantages are still limited by high facility costs and technological challenges. There are extensive ongoing efforts to improve upon these, which will lead to greater accessibility, superior delivery, and therefore better treatment outcomes. Yet, the issue of cost remains a primary hurdle as utility of CPT is largely driven by the affordability, complexity and performance of current technology. Modern delivery techniques are necessary but limited by extended treatment times. Several of these aspects can be addressed by developments in the beam delivery system (BDS) which determines the overall shaping and timing capabilities enabling high quality treatments. The energy layer switching time (ELST) is a limiting constraint of the BDS and a determinant of the beam delivery time (BDT), along with the accelerator and other factors. This review evaluates the delivery process in detail, presenting the limitations and developments for the BDS and related accelerator technology, toward decreasing the BDT. As extended BDT impacts motion and has dosimetric implications for treatment, we discuss avenues to minimize the ELST and overview the clinical benefits and feasibility of a large energy acceptance BDS. These developments support the possibility of advanced modalities and faster delivery for a greater range of treatment indications which could also further reduce costs. Further work to realize methodologies such as volumetric rescanning, FLASH, arc, multi-ion and online image guided therapies are discussed. In this review we examine how increased treatment efficiency and efficacy could be achieved with improvements in beam delivery and how this could lead to faster and higher quality treatments for the future of CPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacinta Yap
- School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrea De Franco
- IFMIF Accelerator Development Group, Rokkasho Fusion Institute, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Aomori, Japan
| | - Suzie Sheehy
- School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wei S, Lin H, Choi JI, Simone CB, Kang M. A Novel Proton Pencil Beam Scanning FLASH RT Delivery Method Enables Optimal OAR Sparing and Ultra-High Dose Rate Delivery: A Comprehensive Dosimetry Study for Lung Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5790. [PMID: 34830946 PMCID: PMC8616118 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE While transmission proton beams have been demonstrated to achieve ultra-high dose rate FLASH therapy delivery, they are unable to spare normal tissues distal to the target. This study aims to compare FLASH treatment planning using single energy Bragg peak proton beams versus transmission proton beams in lung tumors and to evaluate Bragg peak plan optimization, characterize plan quality, and quantify organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. MATERIALS AND METHODS Both Bragg peak and transmission plans were optimized using an in-house platform for 10 consecutive lung patients previously treated with proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). To bring the dose rate up to the FLASH-RT threshold, Bragg peak plans with a minimum MU/spot of 1200 and transmission plans with a minimum MU/spot of 400 were developed. Two common prescriptions, 34 Gy in 1 fraction and 54 Gy in 3 fractions, were studied with the same beam arrangement for both Bragg peak and transmission plans (n = 40 plans). RTOG 0915 dosimetry metrics and dose rate metrics based on different dose rate calculations, including average dose rate (ADR), dose-averaged dose rate (DADR), and dose threshold dose rate (DTDR), were investigated. We then evaluated the effect of beam angular optimization on the Bragg peak plans to explore the potential for superior OAR sparing. RESULTS Bragg peak plans significantly reduced doses to several OAR dose parameters, including lung V7.4Gy and V7Gy by 32.0% (p < 0.01) and 30.4% (p < 0.01) for 34Gy/fx plans, respectively; and by 40.8% (p < 0.01) and 41.2% (p < 0.01) for 18Gy/fx plans, respectively, compared with transmission plans. Bragg peak plans have ~3% less in DADR and ~10% differences in mean OARs in DTDR and DADR relative to transmission plans due to the larger portion of lower dose regions of Bragg peak plans. With angular optimization, optimized Bragg peak plans can further reduce the lung V7Gy by 20.7% (p < 0.01) and V7.4Gy by 19.7% (p < 0.01) compared with Bragg peak plans without angular optimization while achieving a similar 3D dose rate distribution. CONCLUSION The single-energy Bragg peak plans achieve superior dosimetry performances in OARs to transmission plans with comparable dose rate performances for lung cancer FLASH therapy. Beam angle optimization can further improve the OAR dosimetry parameters with similar 3D FLASH dose rate coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Minglei Kang
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (J.I.C.); (C.B.S.II)
| |
Collapse
|