Setting Up an Ultra-Fast Next-Generation Sequencing Approach as Reflex Testing at Diagnosis of Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; Experience of a Single Center (LPCE, Nice, France)

Current challenges and practical aspects of molecular pathology for non-small cell lung cancers

The continuing evolution of treatment options in thoracic oncology requires the pathologist to regularly update diagnostic algorithms for management of tumor samples. It is essential to decide on the best way to use tissue biopsies, cytological samples, as well as liquid biopsies to identify the different mandatory predictive biomarkers of lung cancers in a short turnaround time. However, biological resources and laboratory member workforce are limited and may be not sufficient for the increased complexity of molecular pathological analyses and for complementary translational research development. In this context, the surgical pathologist is the only one who makes the decisions whether or not to send specimens to immunohistochemical and molecular pathology platforms. Moreover, the pathologist can rapidly contact the oncologist to obtain a new tissue biopsy and/or a liquid biopsy if he/she considers that the biological material is not sufficient in quantity or quality for assessment of predictive biomarkers. Inadequate control of algorithms and sampling workflow may lead to false negative, inconclusive, and incomplete findings, resulting in inappropriate choice of therapeutic strategy and potentially poor outcome for patients. International guidelines for lung cancer treatment are based on the results of the expression of different proteins and on genomic alterations. These guidelines have been established taking into consideration the best practices to be set up in clinical and molecular pathology laboratories. This review addresses the current predictive biomarkers and algorithms for use in thoracic oncology molecular pathology as well as the central role of the pathologist, notably in the molecular tumor board and her/his participation in the treatment decision-making. The perspectives in this setting will be discussed.

Referred molecular testing as a barrier to optimal treatment decision making in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Experience at a tertiary academic institution in Canada

BACKGROUND

Molecular testing is critical to guiding treatment approaches in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), with testing delays adversely impacting the timeliness of treatment decisions. Here, we aimed to evaluate the time from initial mNSCLC diagnosis to treatment decision (TTD) following implementation of in-house EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1 testing at our institution.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 165 patients (send-out testing, n = 92; in-house testing, n = 73) with newly diagnosed mNSCLC treated at our institution. Data were compared during the send-out (March 2017-May 2019) and in-house (July 2019-March 2021) testing periods. We performed a detailed workflow analysis to provide insight on the pre-analytic, analytic, and post-analytic intervals that constituted the total TTD.

RESULTS

TTD was significantly shorter with in-house testing (10 days vs. 18 days, p < 0.0001), driven largely by decreased internal handling and specimen transit times (2 days vs. 3 days, p < 0.0001) and laboratory turnaround times (TAT, 3 days vs. 8 days, p < 0.0001), with 96% of in-house cases meeting the international guideline of a ≤ 10-day intra-laboratory TAT (vs. 74% send-out, p < 0.001). Eighty-eight percent of patients with in-house testing had results available at their first oncology consultation (vs. 52% send-out, p < 0.0001), and all patients with in-house testing had results available at the time of treatment decision (vs. 86% send-out, p = 0.57).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate the advantages of in-house biomarker testing for mNSCLC at a tertiary oncology center. Incorporation of in-house testing may reduce barriers to offering personalized medicine by improving the time to optimal systemic therapy decision.

Uterine Tumours Resembling Ovarian Sex-Cord Tumors: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex-cord tumors (UTROSCT) are thought to develop from pluripotent uterine mesenchymal cells or endometrial stromal cells with secondary sex-cord differentiation. The patient was a 73-year-old postmenopausal woman who had abnormal vaginal bleeding, and she underwent a laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. The diagnosis was a case of UTROSCT. A scoping review of the UTROSCT case report present in the literature has been conducted, and 63 articles were found, of which 45 were considered for the 66 clinical cases examined. At the time of diagnosis, six metastatic localizations were found in 59 patients undergoing demolitive surgery (10.2%). Recurrences were diagnosed in 13/59 (22%) patients with multiple locations. A molecular study was performed in 18/66 cases (27.3%) and genetic alterations were found in 10/18 (55.6%) patients. UTROSCTs are considered rare uterine tumors, typically with a favorable prognosis, and are generally considered to have a good prognosis. But, from the review done, they may already manifest themselves at advanced stages, with the possibility of recurrences even at a distance. It would, therefore, be important to be able to define the most aggressive forms and, perhaps, molecular investigation with sequencing could help identify patients most at risk.

c-Met immunohistochemistry as reflex test at diagnosis for non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world experience from a monocentric case series

AIMS

Recent clinical trials have shown promising results with drugs targeting the hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-Met) for advanced non-small cell lung cancers overexpressing c-Met. We assessed reflex testing of c-Met immunohistochemistry (IHC) at diagnosis for NSCLC in the real-world.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected clinical, pathological and molecular data of cases diagnosed with NSCLC in our institution from January 2021 to June 2023. We performed c-Met IHC (SP44 clone) and scored the expression using a H-score and a three-tier classification.

RESULTS

391 cases with interpretable c-Met IHC staining were included. The median age at diagnosis was 70 years (range 25-89 years) including 234 males (male/female ratio 1:5). 58% of the samples came from surgical resections, 35% from biopsies and 8% from cytological procedures. 52% of cases were classified as c-Met-positive (H-score≥150) and 19% were classified as c-Methigh (≥50%, 3+). 43% of the c-Metneg presented with lymph node and/or visceral metastases at diagnosis vs 55% for c-Methigh (p=0.042). 23% of the adenocarcinomas showed c-Methigh expression vs 3% for squamous cell carcinomas (p=0.004). 27% of the c-Metneg cases had a high PD-L1 expression vs 58% of c-Methigh cases (p<0.001). MET ex14 skipping was present in 8% of the c-Methigh cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic c-Met testing in daily routine for NSCLC patients is feasible, highlighting a potential correlation with clinicopathological and molecular features.

Real-world EGFR testing practices for non-small-cell lung cancer by thoracic pathology laboratories across Europe

BACKGROUND

Testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations is an essential recommendation in guidelines for metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, and is considered mandatory in European countries. However, in practice, challenges are often faced when carrying out routine biomarker testing, including access to testing, inadequate tissue samples and long turnaround times (TATs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To evaluate the real-world EGFR testing practices of European pathology laboratories, an online survey was set up and validated by the Pulmonary Pathology Working Group of the European Society of Pathology and distributed to 64 expert testing laboratories. The retrospective survey focussed on laboratory organisation and daily EGFR testing practice of pathologists and molecular biologists between 2018 and 2021.

RESULTS

TATs varied greatly both between and within countries. These discrepancies may be partly due to reflex testing practices, as 20.8% of laboratories carried out EGFR testing only at the request of the clinician. Many laboratories across Europe still favour single-test sequencing as a primary method of EGFR mutation identification; 32.7% indicated that they only used targeted techniques and 45.1% used single-gene testing followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS), depending on the case. Reported testing rates were consistent over time with no significant decrease in the number of EGFR tests carried out in 2020, despite the increased pressure faced by testing facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. ISO 15189 accreditation was reported by 42.0% of molecular biology laboratories for single-test sequencing, and by 42.3% for NGS. 92.5% of laboratories indicated they regularly participate in an external quality assessment scheme.

CONCLUSIONS

These results highlight the strong heterogeneity of EGFR testing that still occurs within thoracic pathology and molecular biology laboratories across Europe. Even among expert testing facilities there is variability in testing capabilities, TAT, reflex testing practice and laboratory accreditation, stressing the need to harmonise reimbursement technologies and decision-making algorithms in Europe.

European Real-World Assessment of the Clinical Validity of a CE-IVD Panel for Ultra-Fast Next-Generation Sequencing in Solid Tumors

Molecular profiling of solid tumors facilitates personalized, targeted therapeutic interventions. The ability to perform next-generation sequencing (NGS), especially from small tissue samples, in a short turnaround time (TAT) is essential to providing results that enable rapid clinical decisions. This multicenter study evaluated the performance of a CE in vitro diagnostic (IVD) assay, the Oncomine Dx Express Test, on the Ion Torrent Genexus System for detecting DNA and RNA variants in solid tumors. Eighty-two archived formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue samples from lung, colorectal, central nervous system, melanoma, breast, gastric, thyroid, and soft tissue cancers were used to assess the presence of single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions and deletions (indels), copy number variations (CNVs), gene fusions, and splice variants. These clinical samples were previously characterized at the various academic centers using orthogonal methods. The Oncomine Dx Express Test showed high performance with 100% concordance with previous characterization for SNVs, indels, CNVs, gene fusions, and splice variants. SNVs and indels with allele frequencies as low as 5% were correctly identified. The test detected all the expected ALK, RET, NTRK1, and ROS1 fusion isoforms and MET exon 14-skipping splice variants. The average TAT from extracted nucleic acids to the final variant report was 18.3 h. The Oncomine Dx Express Test in combination with the Ion Torrent Genexus System is a CE-IVD-compliant, performant, and multicenter reproducible method for NGS detection of actionable biomarkers from a range of tumor samples, providing results in a short TAT that could support timely decision- making for targeted therapeutic interventions.

Matched tissue and liquid biopsies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients A potentially indispensable complementary approach

The introduction of liquid biopsies (LB) has brought forth a number of therapeutic opportunities into the domain of thoracic oncology. Many of which have been adopted for care of patients presenting with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (aNS-NSCLC). For example, one of the most frequent indications to perform a LB in these patients, at least in Europe, is for patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting EGFR and ALK genomic alterations when the tumor progresses. A tissue biopsy (TB) must then be taken, ideally from a site of a tumor that progresses, in particular if the LB does not permit detection of a mechanism of resistance to TKI. A LB from a patient with aNS-NSCLC is recommended before first-line therapy if no tissue and/or cytological material is accessible or if the extracted nucleic acid is insufficient in amount and/or of poor quality. At present a LB and a TB are rarely performed simultaneously before treatment and/or on tumor progression. This complementary/matched testing approach is still controversial but needs to be better evaluated to determine the true benefit to care of patients. This review provides an update on the complementarity of the LB and TB method for care of patients presenting with aNS-NSCLC.

Fast In-House Next-Generation Sequencing in the Diagnosis of Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Hospital Budget Impact Analysis

Background: Targeted therapy for cancer is becoming more frequent as the understanding of the molecular pathogenesis increases. Molecular testing must be done to use targeted therapy. Unfortunately, the testing turnaround time can delay the initiation of targeted therapy. Objective: To investigate the impact of a next-generation sequencing (NGS) machine in the hospital that would allow for in-house NGS testing of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) in a US setting. Methods: The differences between 2 hospital pathways were established with a cohort-level decision tree that feeds into a Markov model. A pathway that used in-house NGS (75%) and the use of external laboratories (so-called send-out NGS) (25%), was compared with the standard of exclusively send-out NGS. The model was from the perspective of a US hospital over a 5-year time horizon. All cost input data were in or inflated to 2021 USD. Scenario analysis was done on key variables. Results: In a hospital with 500 mNSCLC patients, the implementation of in-house NGS was estimated to increase the testing costs and the revenue of the hospital. The model predicted a $710 060 increase in testing costs, a $1 732 506 increase in revenue, and a $1 022 446 return on investment over 5 years. The payback period was 15 months with in-house NGS. The number of patients on targeted therapy increased by 3.38%, and the average turnaround time decreased by 10 days when in-house NGS was used. Discussion: Reducing testing turnaround time is a benefit of in-house NGS. It could contribute to fewer mNSCLC patients lost to second opinion and an increased number of patients on targeted therapy. The model outcomes predicted that, over a 5-year period, there would be a positive return on investment for a US hospital. The model reflects a proposed scenario. The heterogeneity of hospital inputs and the cost of send-out NGS means context-specific inputs are needed. Conclusion: Using in-house NGS testing could reduce the testing turnaround time and increase the number of patients on targeted therapy. Additional benefits for the hospital are that fewer patients will be lost to second opinion and that in-house NGS could generate additional revenue.

A Real-World Experience from a Single Center (LPCE, Nice, France) Highlights the Urgent Need to Abandon Immunohistochemistry for ROS1 Rearrangement Screening of Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The detection of ROS1 rearrangements in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma (NS-NSCLC) permits administration of efficient targeted therapy. Detection is based on a testing algorithm associated with ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening followed by ROS1 FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) to confirm positivity. However, (i) ROS1 rearrangements are rare (1-2% of NS-NSCLC), (ii) the specificity of ROS1 IHC is not optimal, and (iii) ROS1 FISH is not widely available, making this algorithm challenging to interpret time-consuming. We evaluated RNA NGS, which was used as reflex testing for ROS1 rearrangements in NS-NSCLC with the aim of replacing ROS1 IHC as a screening method. ROS1 IHC and RNA NGS were prospectively performed in 810 NS-NSCLC. Positive results were analyzed by ROS1 FISH. ROS1 IHC was positive in 36/810 (4.4%) cases that showed variable staining intensity while NGS detected ROS1 rearrangements in 16/810 (1.9%) cases. ROS1 FISH was positive in 15/810 (1.8%) of ROS1 IHC positive cases and in all positive ROS1 NGS cases. Obtaining both ROS1 IHC and ROS1 FISH reports took an average of 6 days, while obtaining ROS1 IHC and RNA NGS reports took an average of 3 days. These results showed that systematic screening for the ROS1 status using IHC must be replaced by NGS reflex testing.

Lack of correlation between MET and PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer revealed by comparative study of matched biopsies and surgical resection samples

INTRODUCTION

Both MET expression and the PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) are companion diagnostics for treatment of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (aNSCLC) patients. We evaluated the rate of correlation between MET expression and the PD-L1 TPS in matched biopsies and surgically resected specimens from NSCLC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis assessed the prevalence and correlation between MET expression (SP44 clone) and the PD-L1 TPS (22C3 clone) by immunohistochemistry together with molecular alterations determined by targeted next-generation sequencing in matched lung biopsy and surgically lung resected specimens from 70 patients with NSCLC.

RESULTS

The study found a significant correlation between the MET H-score in surgical samples and matched biopsies (P-value < 0.0001), as well as between the PD-L1 TPS in paired biopsies and surgical samples (P-value < 0.0001). However, there was no significant correlation between the MET H-score or expression subgroups and the PD-L1 TPS in both types of paired samples (P-value = 0.47, and P-value = 0.90). The MET H-score was significantly higher in adenocarcinoma compared to squamous cell carcinoma (P-value < 0.0001). A mutational analysis showed that the MET H-score was significantly higher in NSCLC cases with targetable molecular alterations (P-value = 0.0095), while no significant correlation was found for the PD-L1 TPS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found no significant correlation between PD-L1 and MET expression in samples from NSCLC patients, highlighting the importance of personalized treatment strategies based on individual expression profiles. These findings provide valuable insight into the development of effective immunotherapy and targeted therapy for NSCLC patients.

An Italian Multicenter Perspective Harmonization Trial for the Assessment of MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations in Standard Reference Samples

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. International societies have promoted the molecular analysis of MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (MET) exon 14 skipping for the clinical stratification of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Different technical approaches are available to detect MET exon 14 skipping in routine practice. Here, the technical performance and reproducibility of testing strategies for MET exon 14 skipping carried out in various centers were evaluated. In this retrospective study, each institution received a set (n = 10) of a customized artificial formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cell line (Custom METex14 skipping FFPE block) that harbored the MET exon 14 skipping mutation (Seracare Life Sciences, Milford, MA, USA), which was previously validated by the Predictive Molecular Pathology Laboratory at the University of Naples Federico II. Each participating institution managed the reference slides according to their internal routine workflow. MET exon 14 skipping was successfully detected by all participating institutions. Molecular analysis highlighted a median Cq cut off of 29.3 (ranging from 27.1 to 30.7) and 2514 (ranging from 160 to 7526) read counts for real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and NGS-based analyses, respectively. Artificial reference slides were a valid tool to harmonize technical workflows in the evaluation of MET exon 14 skipping molecular alterations in routine practice.

Ultrafast Gene Fusion Assessment for Nonsquamous NSCLC

Introduction

Gene fusion testing of ALK, ROS1, RET, NTRK, and MET exon 14 skipping mutations is guideline recommended in nonsquamous NSCLC (NS-NSCLC). Nevertheless, assessment is often hindered by the limited availability of tissue and prolonged next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing, which can protract the initiation of a targeted therapy. Therefore, the development of faster gene fusion assessment is critical for optimal clinical decision-making. Here, we compared two ultrafast gene fusion assays (UFGFAs) using NGS (Genexus, Oncomine Precision Assay, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a multiplex reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (Idylla, GeneFusion Assay, Biocartis) approach at diagnosis in a retrospective series of 195 NS-NSCLC cases and five extrapulmonary tumors with a known NTRK fusion.

Methods

A total of 195 NS-NSCLC cases (113 known gene fusions and 82 wild-type tumors) were included retrospectively. To validate the detection of a NTRK fusion, we added five NTRK-positive extrathoracic tumors. The diagnostic performance of the two UFGFAs and standard procedures was compared.

Results

The accuracy was 92.3% and 93.1% for Idylla and Genexus, respectively. Both systems improved the sensitivity for detection by including a 5'-3' imbalance analysis. Although detection of ROS1, MET exon 14 skipping, and RET was excellent with both systems, ALK fusion detection was reduced with sensitivities of 87% and 88%, respectively. Idylla had a limited sensitivity of 67% for NTRK fusions, in which only an imbalance assessment was used.

Conclusions

UFGFA using NGS and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction approaches had an equal level of detection of gene fusion but with some technique-specific limitations. Nevertheless, UFGFA detection in routine clinical care is feasible with both systems allowing faster initiation of therapy and a broad degree of screening.

Molecular Profiling in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: Towards a Switch to Next-Generation Sequencing Reflex Testing

Molecular diagnosis of lung cancer is a constantly evolving field thanks to major advances in precision oncology. The wide range of actionable molecular alterations in non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma (NS-NSCLC) and the multiplicity of mechanisms of resistance to treatment resulted in the need for repeated testing to establish an accurate molecular diagnosis, as well as to track disease evolution over time. While assessing the increasing complexity of the molecular composition of tumors at baseline, as well as over time, has become increasingly challenging, the emergence and implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing has extensively facilitated molecular profiling in NS-NSCLC. In this review, we discuss recent developments in the molecular profiling of NS-NSCLC and how NGS addresses current needs, as well as how it can be implemented to address future challenges in the management of NS-NSCLC.

Deciphering the Impact of HER2 Alterations on Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: From Biological Mechanisms to Therapeutic Approaches

Despite the recent increase in the number of types of treatments, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the major cause of death from cancer worldwide. So, there is an urgent need to develop new therapeutic strategies. The HER2 gene codes for tyrosine kinase receptor whose alterations are known to drive carcinogenesis. HER2 alterations, including amplification, mutations, and overexpression, have been mainly described in breast and gastric cancers, but up to 4% of NSCLC harbor actionable HER2 mutations. HER2-targeted therapy for NSCLC with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab emtansine has failed to demonstrate an improvement in survival. Nevertheless, recent data from phase II trials have shed light on promising specific therapies for HER2-mutant NSCLC such as trastuzumab deruxtecan. Herein, we aimed to provide an updated review on the biology, epidemiology, molecular testing, and therapeutic strategies for NSCLC with HER2 molecular alterations.