1
|
Malshy K, Bandari J, Messing EM. Re: Thomas van Doeveren, Sebastiaan Remmers, Egbert R. Boevé, et al. Intravesical Instillation of Chemotherapy Before Radical Surgery for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: The REBACARE Trial. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2024.12.006. Eur Urol 2025:S0302-2838(25)00253-2. [PMID: 40318931 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2025] [Accepted: 02/28/2025] [Indexed: 05/07/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Kamil Malshy
- Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Jathin Bandari
- Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Edward M Messing
- Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Bello F, Siech C, de Angelis M, Rodriguez Peñaranda N, Tian Z, Goyal JA, Collà Ruvolo C, Califano G, Creta M, Saad F, Shariat SF, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Puliatti S, Longo N, Karakiewicz PI. Critical care therapy and in-hospital mortality after radical nephroureterectomy for nonmetastatic upper urinary tract carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2025; 43:328.e9-328.e15. [PMID: 39395866 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.09.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2024] [Revised: 09/02/2024] [Accepted: 09/26/2024] [Indexed: 10/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of critical care therapies (CCT), that include invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and other modalities are unknown after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper urinary tract carcinoma (UUTC). Their relationship with in-hospital mortality is also unknown. METHODS Within the National Inpatient Sample (2008-2019), we identified non-metastatic UUTC patients treated with RNU. Multivariable logistic regression models were used. RESULTS Of 8,995 patients, 375 (4.2%) received CCT and 82 (0.9%) experienced in-hospital mortality. Of CCT modalities, 215 (2.4%) received IMV and 139 (1.5%) TPN. Temporal CCT, IMV, and TPN trends very closely followed in-hospital mortality trends. Relative to historical UUTC patients (2008-2013), contemporary (2014-2019) patients exhibited lower CCT (Δ = 2.2%, P value < 0.0001), lower IMV (Δ = 1.4%, P < 0.0001), lower TPN (Δ = 2.2%, P < 0.0001), and lower in-hospital mortality (Δ = 0.4%, P = 0.03) rates. Of in-hospital mortalities, 52 out of 82 received CCT but 30 of 82 did not. Median age (> 72 years; odds ratio [OR] 1.4; P = 0.002) and Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3 (OR 4.1; P < 0.001) and ≥ 1-2 (OR 1.7; P = 0.001) independently predicted overall higher CCT, IMV, TPN, and in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION After RNU, CCT rates parallels in-hospital mortality rates. CCT represents a 5 to 6-fold multiple of in-hospital mortality rate. In RNU patients, CCT rates are higher in older and sicker individuals. Lower CCT rates that are paralleled by lower in-hospital mortality may be interpreted as an indicator of improved quality of care. Ideally all in-hospital mortalities should be predated by CCT exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen J, Zhang L, Dai Z, Chang C, Tong H, Cui H, Song Z, Fan B, Liu Z, Wang L. Perioperative and oncological outcomes of single position retroperitoneoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Sci Rep 2025; 15:11221. [PMID: 40175503 PMCID: PMC11965278 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-96261-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2025] [Indexed: 04/04/2025] Open
Abstract
Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the gold standard therapy for patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). In this study, we compared the effect of two surgical techniques, single-position complete retroperitoneoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (SCRNU) and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with open bladder cuff excision (LNOBE), on perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes in UTUC patients. We retrospectively collected information on baseline characteristics, clinicopathological characteristics, surgical approaches, perioperative data, and survival outcomes from 174 patients who underwent RNU for UTUC between January 2018 and June 2023 in our center. The data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test, Fisher's exact test, Chi-square test. Linear regressions were applied to explore the effect of surgery approach on the continuous outcomes. Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to describe the survival outcome. Univariate and Multivariate Cox regressions were conducted to explore the independent prognostic factors. To address potential selection bias, we also employed an Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) strategy. Patients who underwent SCRNU had shorter operative times (p < 0.001), reduced estimated blood loss (p < 0.001), less drainage on the first postoperative day (p = 0.009), shorter hospital stays (p = 0.001), and better intravesical recurrence-free survival than those who underwent LNOBE (IVRFS, HR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.07-0.44, p = 0.007). Moreover, SCRNU was confirmed to be a protective factor for IVRFS after IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis was performed (HR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.04-0.77, p = 0.021). SCRNU not only avoids intraoperative repositioning but also improves perioperative outcomes, including the reduction of operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay, and is associated with better IVRFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaqiang Chen
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No.467, Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Urological Digital Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Engineering Research Center of Integrated Precision Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Urological Cancer, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Key Laboratory of Prostate Cancer Research, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
| | - Luxin Zhang
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No.467, Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Urological Digital Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Engineering Research Center of Integrated Precision Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Urological Cancer, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Key Laboratory of Prostate Cancer Research, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
| | - Zhihong Dai
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No.467, Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Urological Digital Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Engineering Research Center of Integrated Precision Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Urological Cancer, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Key Laboratory of Prostate Cancer Research, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
| | - Cheng Chang
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No.467, Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Urological Digital Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Engineering Research Center of Integrated Precision Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Urological Cancer, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Key Laboratory of Prostate Cancer Research, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
| | - Heyao Tong
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No.467, Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Urological Digital Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Engineering Research Center of Integrated Precision Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Urological Cancer, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Key Laboratory of Prostate Cancer Research, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
| | - Hepeng Cui
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No.467, Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Urological Digital Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Engineering Research Center of Integrated Precision Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Urological Cancer, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Key Laboratory of Prostate Cancer Research, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
| | - Zhuwei Song
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No.467, Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Urological Digital Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Engineering Research Center of Integrated Precision Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Urological Cancer, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Key Laboratory of Prostate Cancer Research, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China
| | - Bo Fan
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No.467, Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China.
- Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Urological Digital Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China.
- Liaoning Engineering Research Center of Integrated Precision Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Urological Cancer, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China.
- Dalian Key Laboratory of Prostate Cancer Research, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China.
| | - Zhiyu Liu
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No.467, Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China.
- Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Urological Digital Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China.
- Liaoning Engineering Research Center of Integrated Precision Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Urological Cancer, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China.
- Dalian Key Laboratory of Prostate Cancer Research, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China.
| | - Liang Wang
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No.467, Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China.
- Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Urological Digital Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China.
- Liaoning Engineering Research Center of Integrated Precision Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Urological Cancer, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China.
- Dalian Key Laboratory of Prostate Cancer Research, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Doeveren T, Remmers S, Boevé ER, Cornel EB, van der Heijden AG, Hendricksen K, Cauberg ECC, Jacobs R, Kroon BK, Leliveld AM, Meijer RP, van Melick H, Merks B, Oddens JR, Pradere B, Roelofs LAJ, Somford DM, de Vries P, Wijsman B, Windt WAKM, Yska M, Zwaan PJ, Aben KKH, van Leeuwen PJ, Boormans JL. Intravesical Instillation of Chemotherapy Before Radical Surgery for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: The REBACARE Trial. Eur Urol 2025; 87:444-452. [PMID: 39843302 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2024] [Revised: 12/09/2024] [Accepted: 12/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Intravesical instillation of chemotherapy (IIC) after radical surgery for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) reduces the risk of intravesical recurrence (IVR). However, compliance is low because of possible extravesical leakage after bladder cuff excision. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative IIC in reducing the risk of IVR. METHODS In this prospective, single-arm, multi-institutional, phase 2 clinical trial, 190 chemonaïve patients with primary UTUC without prior or concurrent bladder cancer received a single intravesical instillation of mitomycin C for 1-2 hr within 3 h before surgery. The primary endpoint was the 2-yr histologically confirmed IVR rate, with a target reduction of >40% (from 33.2% according to literature data to <20%). A historical cohort of 247 patients with UTUC who did not receive perioperative IIC served as the reference. Secondary endpoints included compliance, toxicity, and IVR-free survival, which was analyzed via multivariable Cox regression and stratified by previous diagnostic ureteroscopy (d-URS). KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS The 2-yr IVR rate was 24% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18-31%) on intention-to-treat analysis and 23% (95% CI 13-32%) on per-protocol analysis. Multivariable analysis revealed that d-URS was associated with higher IVR risk. In the REBACARE cohort, patients without d-URS had threefold lower IVR risk (hazard ratio 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.87) in comparison to the reference cohort. Compliance with preoperative instillation was 96% and no grade >2 toxicity occurred. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Preoperative IIC with mitomycin C was feasible and well tolerated and significantly reduced IVR risk for patients without d-URS. These findings suggest that preoperative IIC is a viable strategy for this subset of UTUC patients and that d-URS should be performed judiciously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas van Doeveren
- Department of Urology Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.
| | - Sebastiaan Remmers
- Department of Urology Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Egbert R Boevé
- Department of Urology Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Erik B Cornel
- Department of Urology Ziekenhuis Groep Twente Hengelo The Netherlands
| | | | - Kees Hendricksen
- Department of Urology Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | | | - Rens Jacobs
- Department of Urology Zuyderland Medical Center Heerlen The Netherlands
| | - Bin K Kroon
- Department of Urology Rijnstate Medical Center Arnhem The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie M Leliveld
- Department of Urology University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Richard P Meijer
- Department of Oncological Urology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Harm van Melick
- Department of Urology St. Antonius Ziekenhuis Nieuwegein The Netherlands
| | - Bob Merks
- Department of Urology Haaglanden Medical Center Leidschendam The Netherlands
| | - Jorg R Oddens
- Department of Urology Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology La Croix du Sud Hospital Quint-Fonsegrives France
| | - Luc A J Roelofs
- Department of Urology Treant Zorggroep Emmen The Netherlands
| | - Diederik M Somford
- Department of Urology Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis Nijmegen The Netherlands
| | - Peter de Vries
- Department of Urology Zuyderland Medical Center Heerlen The Netherlands
| | - Bart Wijsman
- Department of Urology Elisabeth-Tweesteden Medical Center Tilburg The Netherlands
| | | | - Marit Yska
- Department of Urology Maasstad Ziekenhuis Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Peter J Zwaan
- Department of Urology Gelre Ziekenhuis Apeldoorn The Netherlands
| | - Katja K H Aben
- Department of Research and Development Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization Utrecht The Netherlands; IQ Health Science Department Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Messing EM, Malshy K. Intravesical instillation of chemotherapy before surgery for upper tract urothelial cancer. Bladder Cancer 2025; 11:23523735251332755. [PMID: 40342811 PMCID: PMC12059432 DOI: 10.1177/23523735251332755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2025] [Accepted: 03/13/2025] [Indexed: 05/11/2025]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kamil Malshy
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Di Bello F, Rodriguez Peñaranda N, Marmiroli A, Longoni M, Falkenbach F, Le QC, Tian Z, Goyal JA, Collà Ruvolo C, Califano G, Creta M, Saad F, Shariat SF, Puliatti S, De Cobelli O, Briganti A, Graefen M, Chun FHK, Longo N, Karakiewicz PI. In-Hospital Outcomes after Robotic Vs Open Radical Nephroureterectomy. J Endourol 2025; 39:127-134. [PMID: 39829349 DOI: 10.1089/end.2024.0730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2025] Open
Abstract
Objective: To test whether the contemporary robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (RNU) is associated with more favorable in-hospital outcomes than historical RNU, relative to the same endpoints in open NU (ONU). Methods: Within the National Inpatient Sample (2008-2019), we identified RNU and ONU patients. Multivariable logistic and Poisson regression models were fitted. Results: Of 8032 NU patients, historical (2008-2013) vs contemporary (2014-2019) proportions were 776 (41%) vs 1104 (59%) for RNU and 3719 (60%) vs 2433 (40%) for ONU. The rates of RNU have increased over time (2008-2019; Δ absolute: +18%; p < 0.001). Contemporary RNU patients exhibited significantly better in-hospital outcomes in 6 of 12 comparisons vs historical that ranged from -54% for genitourinary complications to -12% for median length of stay (LOS). Contemporary ONU patients also exhibited significantly better in-hospital outcomes in 11 of 12 comparisons vs historical that ranged from -67% for blood transfusions to -26% for gastrointestinal complications. When historical RNU was compared with historical ONU, RNU in-hospital outcomes were better in 7 of 12 comparisons that ranged from -61% for median LOS to -16% for postoperative complications. Conversely, when contemporary RNU was compared with contemporary ONU, RNU in-hospital outcomes were only better in 2 of 12 comparisons: -25% cardiac complications and -13% for median LOS. Conclusion: The magnitude of in-hospital outcomes categories improvement between historical vs contemporary was two-fold more pronounced in ONU (11 improved categories) than in RNU (6 improved categories). Few outcome benefits remained (two categories only) when contemporary RNU was compared with contemporary ONU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Andrea Marmiroli
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabian Falkenbach
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Quynh Chi Le
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Felix H K Chun
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Basile G, Bandini M, Li R, Poch MA, Necchi A, Spiess PE. Gold standard nephroureterectomy, chemoprophylaxis and surveillance in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Curr Opin Urol 2024:00042307-990000000-00208. [PMID: 39529478 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to summarize the most recent evidence on surgical management, strategies to reduce tumor recurrence, and surveillance regimens in patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and elected for radical treatment. RECENT FINDINGS Minimally invasive surgery is gaining momentum in the surgical management of UTUC. Chemoprophylaxis is still the gold standard to reduce intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Novel surveillance strategies have been proposed to adapt follow-up regimens to patients' characteristics. SUMMARY Minimally invasive surgery has been associated with comparable oncological outcomes to the open approach while improving postoperative morbidity. In these cases, bladder cuff excision (BCE) is mostly performed by an extravesical approach, that demonstrates a noninferiority compared to the intravesical one in terms of oncological outcomes. Although lymphadenectomy is recommended in patients with high-risk tumors, its benefits are still unclear. Currently, there is a lack of recent prospective trials on chemoprophylaxis to reduce intravesical recurrence post RNU, making single-dose postoperative chemotherapy instillation the standard treatment. Although novel risk stratification models were released by international urological guidelines, their validity is mainly nonevidence-based. Risk-adapted follow-up strategies incorporating cystoscopy and cross-sectional imaging accounting for individual patient factors should be implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Basile
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Bandini
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Roger Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Michael A Poch
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Roumiguié M, Seisen T, Masson-Lecomte A, Prost D, Allory Y, Xylinas E, Leon P, Bajeot AS, Pradère B, Marcq G, Neuzillet Y, Thibault C, Audenet F, Rouprêt M. French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2024-2026: Upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). THE FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2024; 34:102722. [PMID: 39581669 DOI: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to propose an update of the French guidelines from the national committee ccAFU on upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). METHODS A systematic Medline search for epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment options and follow-up of UTUC was performed between 2022 and 2024 to evaluate available references and their levels of evidence. RESULTS UTUC is a rare malignancy with specific risk factors, including exposure to aristolochic acid and Lynch syndrome. Its diagnosis is based on the use of computed tomography urography and ureterorenoscopy with biopsies. A prognostic classification has been proposed to discriminate low- and high-risk lesions mainly on the basis of tumour grade (low/high) and imaging aspects (non-invasive/invasive). Tumour size (<2/≥2cm), focality (uni-/multifocal), and hydronephrosis (absent/present) are more relative risk factors. The standard of care for low-risk patients is currently conservative treatment involving ureterorenoscopy laser ablation, whereas radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is advised for those with high-risk disease. Adjuvant treatments after RNU include intravesical instillation of chemotherapy to decrease the risk of bladder recurrence and delivery of platinum-based chemotherapy in pT2-T4 and/or pN+ patients. First-line treatment for metastatic UTUC is based on the combination of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab. For unfit patients, platinum-based chemotherapy plus nivolumab followed by maintenance nivolumab or platinum-based chemotherapy followed by maintenance avelumab in those with at least stable disease can be proposed. The surveillance regimen and schedule depend on the disease stage. CONCLUSION These updated guidelines will contribute to improving the management of patients diagnosed with UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Roumiguié
- Urology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, University of Toulouse UT3, Toulouse, France.
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| | | | - Doriane Prost
- Urology Department, Paris Saint Joseph Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Y Allory
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Urology Department, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Anne Sophie Bajeot
- Urology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, University of Toulouse UT3, Toulouse, France
| | - Benjamin Pradère
- UROSUD Urology Department, Clinique Croix Du Sud, 31130 Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Urology Department, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, University Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER - Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris Saclay, Suresnes, France
| | - Constance Thibault
- Medical Oncology Department, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou AP-HP centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - François Audenet
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou AP-HP Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Deng S, Liu L, Wang Y, Zhou C, Zhang H. Laparoscopic Versus Open Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Propensity-Score Matched Studies. Surg Innov 2024; 31:520-529. [PMID: 39101895 DOI: 10.1177/15533506241273378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) vs open nephroureterectomy (ONU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is unclear. METHODS We conducted a meta-analysis of studies based on propensity score-matched cohorts to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of LNU and ONU in UTUC patients. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library until July 12, 2023. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was utilized to assess the quality of eligible studies. Measurements of surgical and oncological outcomes were extracted and pooled including mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), hazard ratios (HR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Five high-quality retrospective studies were included, totaling 6422 patients; 2080 (32.4%) underwent LNU, and 4342 (67.6%) underwent ONU. With respect to surgical outcomes, patients in the LNU group experienced less estimated blood loss and had shorter hospital stay than those in the ONU group, but there was no significant difference in complication rates and operation time. In regard to oncological outcomes, there were no significant differences between the LNU and ONU groups in 3-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). However, 3-year intravesical recurrence free survival (IVRFS) was worse in the LNU group compared to the ONU group. CONCLUSION LNU was associated with less estimated blood loss and shorter hospital stays than ONU, but there were no differences in OS and CSS between the surgical modalities. Nonetheless, LNU might result in poorer IVRFS than ONU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shidong Deng
- Department of Urology, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Lingzhi Liu
- Department of Urology, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Yurou Wang
- Department of Urology, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Chuan Zhou
- Department of Urology, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Huihui Zhang
- Department of Urology, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China
- Institute of Hospital Administration, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wu S, Xiong S, Li J, Hong G, Xie Y, Tang Q, Hao H, Sheng X, Li X, Lin T. A narrative review of advances in the management of urothelial cancer: Diagnostics and treatments. Bladder (San Franc) 2024; 11:e21200003. [PMID: 39308962 PMCID: PMC11413229 DOI: 10.14440/bladder.2024.0003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Revised: 07/16/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma (UC) refers to the malignancies originating from transitional epithelium located on the upper and lower urinary tract. Precise diagnosis of UC is crucial since it dictates the treatment efficacy and prognosis of UC patients. Conventional diagnostic approaches of UC mainly fall into four types, including liquid biopsy, imaging examination, endoscopic examination, and histopathological assessment, among others, each of them has contributed to a more accurate diagnosis of the condition. Therapeutically, UC is primarily managed through surgical intervention. In recent years, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been incrementally used and is showing superiority in terms of lowered perioperative morbidity and quicker recovery with similar oncological outcomes achieved. For advanced UC (aUC), medical therapy is dominant. While platinum-based chemotherapies are the standard first-line option for aUC, some novel treatment alternatives have recently been introduced, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), targeted therapies, and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). ADCs, a group of sophisticated biopharmaceutical agents consisting of monoclonal antibodies, cytotoxic payload, and linker, have been increasingly drawing the attention of clinicians. In this review, we synthesize the recent developments in the precise diagnosis of UC and provide an overview of the treatment options available, including MIS for UC and emerging medications, especially ADCs of aUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaoxu Wu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumour Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory for RNA Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Urological Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shengwei Xiong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
- Institution of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- line>Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Beijing, China
- National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Juan Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Guibin Hong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ye Xie
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qi Tang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
- Institution of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- line>Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Beijing, China
- National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Han Hao
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
- Institution of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- line>Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Beijing, China
- National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Xinan Sheng
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
- Institution of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- line>Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Beijing, China
- National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Tianxin Lin
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumour Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory for RNA Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Urological Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Trecarten S, Bhandari M, Abdelaziz A, Noel O, Liss M, Dursun F, Svatek R, Mansour AM. Open versus minimally invasive nephroureterectomy in octogenarians: An analysis of surgical approach trends, outcomes, and survival analysis with propensity matching. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:220.e9-220.e19. [PMID: 38631967 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare disease accounting only for 5%-10% of urothelial carcinoma (UC). For localized high-risk disease, radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the standard of care. While minimally invasive (MIS) RNU has not been shown to decisively improve overall survival (OS) compared to open surgery, MIS RNU has been associated with reduced hospital length of stay (LOS), blood transfusion requirements and improved recovery, which are important considerations when treating older patients. The purpose of this study is to examine trends in surgical approach selection and outcomes of open vs. MIS RNU in patients aged ≥80 years. METHODS Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), patients aged ≥80 years who underwent open or MIS (either robotic or laparoscopic) RNU were identified from 2010 to 2019. Demographic, patient-related, and disease-specific factors associated with either open or MIS RNU were assessed using multivariate logistic regression models. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox-proportional hazard regression. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was utilized to adjust for confounding variables. Survival analysis was also conducted on the IPTW adjusted cohort using Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox-proportional hazard regression. RESULTS 5,687 patients were identified, with 1,431 (25.2%) and 4,256 (74.8%) patients undergoing open and MIS RNU respectively. The proportion of RNU performed robotically has increased from 12.5% in 2010 to 50.4% in 2019. MIS was associated with a shorter hospital LOS (4.7 days versus 5.9 days, SMD 23.7%). Multivariate analysis revealed that MIS was associated with a significant reduction in 90-day mortality (OR: 0.571; 95%CI: 0.34-0.96, P = 0.033) and improved median OS (53.8 months [95%CI: 50.9-56.9] vs 42.35 months [95%CI: 38.6-46.8], P < 0.001) compared to open surgery. IPTW-adjusted survival analysis revealed improved median OS with MIS when compared to open surgery, with a survival benefit of 46.1 months (95%CI: 40.2-52.4 months) versus 37.7 months (95%CI: 32.6-46.5 months, P = 0.0034) respectively. IPTW-adjusted cox proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that MIS was significantly associated with reduced mortality (HR 0.76, 95%CI: 0.66-0.87, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION In octogenarians undergoing RNU, MIS is associated with improved median OS and 90-day mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaun Trecarten
- Department of Urology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
| | - Mukund Bhandari
- Department of Population Health Sciences, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
| | - Ahmad Abdelaziz
- Department of Urology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
| | - Onika Noel
- Department of Urology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
| | - Michael Liss
- Department of Urology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; UT Health San Antonio/MD Anderson Mays Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX
| | - Furkan Dursun
- Department of Urology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; UT Health San Antonio/MD Anderson Mays Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX
| | - Robert Svatek
- Department of Urology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; UT Health San Antonio/MD Anderson Mays Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX
| | - Ahmed M Mansour
- Department of Urology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; UT Health San Antonio/MD Anderson Mays Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX; Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Refugia JM, Thakker PU, O'Rourke TK, Cohen A, Bradshaw A, Casals R, Sandberg M, Whitman W, Saini S, Hemal AK. Adoption of robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy permits a minimally invasive option for management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma in geriatric patients: comparison with non-geriatric patients with intermediate-term oncologic follow-up. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:257. [PMID: 38896165 PMCID: PMC11186893 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02013-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
To assess the oncologic efficacy and safety of robot-assisted approach to radical nephroureterectomy (RARNU) in geriatric versus younger patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2009 to 2022 of 145 patients (two cohorts: < 75 and ≥ 75 years old) with non-metastatic UTUC who underwent RARNU. Primary endpoint was UTUC-related recurrence of disease during surveillance (bladder-specific and metastatic). Safety was assessed according to 30-day, modified Clavien-Dindo (CD) classifications (Major: C.D. III-V). Survival estimates were performed using Kaplan-Meier method. There were 89 patients < 75 years (median 65 years) and 56 patients ≥ 75 years (median 81 years). Comparing the young versus geriatric cohorts: median follow-up 38 vs 24 months (p = 0.03, respectively) with similar 3-year bladder-specific recurrence survival (60% vs 67%, HR 0.70, 95% CI [0.35, 1.40], p = 0.31) and metastasis-free survival (79% vs 70%, HR 0.71, 95% CI [0.30, 1.70], p = 0.44). Expectedly, the younger cohort had a significant deviation in overall survival compared to the geriatric cohort at 1-year (89% vs 76%) and 3-years (72% vs 41%; HR 3.29, 95% CI [1.88, 5.78], p < 0.01). The 30-day major (1% vs 0) and minor complications (8% vs 14%, p = 0.87). Limitations include retrospective study design of a high-volume, single-surgeon experience. Compared to younger patients with UTUC, geriatric patients undergoing RARNU have similar oncologic outcomes at intermediate-term follow-up with no increased risk of 30-day perioperative complications. Thus, age alone should not be used to disqualify patients from definitive surgical management of UTUC with RARNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin M Refugia
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, 140 Charlois Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27103, USA.
| | - Parth U Thakker
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, 140 Charlois Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27103, USA
| | - Timothy K O'Rourke
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, 140 Charlois Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27103, USA
| | - Adam Cohen
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, 140 Charlois Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27103, USA
| | - Aaron Bradshaw
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, 140 Charlois Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27103, USA
| | - Randy Casals
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, 140 Charlois Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27103, USA
| | - Maxwell Sandberg
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, 140 Charlois Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27103, USA
| | - Wyatt Whitman
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, 140 Charlois Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27103, USA
| | - Sumit Saini
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, 140 Charlois Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27103, USA
| | - Ashok K Hemal
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, 140 Charlois Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27103, USA
| |
Collapse
|