1
|
Levy M, Lifshitz S, Goldenberg-Fumanov M, Bazak L, Goldstein RJ, Hamiel U, Berger R, Lipitz S, Maya I, Shohat M. Exome sequencing in every pregnancy? Results of trio exome sequencing in structurally normal fetuses. Prenat Diagn 2024. [PMID: 38735835 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Revised: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the detection rate of clinically significant results of prenatal exome sequencing (pES) in low-risk pregnancies and apparently normal fetuses in non-consanguineous couples. METHODS A retrospective analysis of pES conducted at a single center from January 2020 to September 2023 was performed. Genetic counseling was provided, and detailed medical histories were obtained. High-risk pregnancies were excluded due to major ultrasound anomalies, sonographic soft markers, abnormal maternal biochemical screening, or family history suggestive of monogenic diseases as well as cases with pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) chromosomal microarray results. Exome analysis focused on ∼2100 genes associated with Mendelian genetic disorders. Variant analysis and classification followed the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. RESULTS Among 1825 pES conducted, 1020 low-risk cases revealed 28 fetuses (2.7%) with potentially clinically significant variants indicating known monogenic diseases, primarily de novo dominant variants (64%). Among these 28 cases, 9 fetuses (0.9%) had the potential for severe phenotypes, including shortened lifespan and intellectual disability, and another 12 had the potential for milder phenotypes. Seven cases were reported with variants of uncertain significance (VUS) that, according to the ACMG criteria, leaned toward LP, constituting 0.7% of the entire cohort. Termination of pregnancy was elected in 13 out of 1020 cases (1.2%) in the cohort, including 7/9 in the severe phenotypes group, 2/12 in the milder phenotype group, and 4/7 in the VUS group. CONCLUSION The 2.7% detection rate highlights the significant contribution of pES in low-risk pregnancies. However, it necessitates rigorous analysis, and comprehensive genetic counseling before and after testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Levy
- The Genetic Institute of Maccabi Health Services, Rehovot, Israel
- School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Raphael Recanati Genetics Institute, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Shira Lifshitz
- The Genetic Institute of Maccabi Health Services, Rehovot, Israel
| | | | - Lily Bazak
- The Genetic Institute of Maccabi Health Services, Rehovot, Israel
| | | | - Uri Hamiel
- The Genetic Institute of Maccabi Health Services, Rehovot, Israel
- School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Rachel Berger
- The Genetic Institute of Maccabi Health Services, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Shlomo Lipitz
- School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Idit Maya
- The Genetic Institute of Maccabi Health Services, Rehovot, Israel
- School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Raphael Recanati Genetics Institute, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Mordechai Shohat
- The Genetic Institute of Maccabi Health Services, Rehovot, Israel
- School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Bioinformatics Unit, Cancer Research Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schubert C, Milverton J, Goodall S, Merlin T. A systematic review to assess the utility of genomic autopsy using exome or genome sequencing in cases of congenital anomalies and perinatal death. Genet Med 2024; 26:101159. [PMID: 38704678 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Exome or genome sequencing (ES or GS) can identify genetic causes of otherwise unexplained congenital anomaly and perinatal death (PND) but is not routine practice. The evidence base for "genomic autopsy" after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA) and PND has been synthesized to determine the value of this investigation. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies meeting prespecified inclusion criteria and containing ≥10 cases of TOPFA or PND (with or without major congenital abnormality), in which ES or GS was conducted. We determined test performance, including diagnostic yield, accuracy, and reliability. We also reported outcomes associated with clinical utility and harms, where described. RESULTS From 2245 potentially eligible studies, 32 publications were eligible and had data extracted, representing 2120 cases that could be meta-analyzed. No diagnostic accuracy or comparative studies were identified, although some analysis of concordance between different ES/GS methodologies could be performed. Studies reporting parent-related outcomes or long-term follow-up did not do so in a systematic or quantifiable manner. CONCLUSION Evidence suggests that approximately one-fourth to one-third of fetal losses associated with TOPFA or unexplained PND are associated with a genetic cause identifiable on ES or GS-albeit this estimate varies depending on phenotypic and background risk factors. Despite the large body of evidence on ES and GS, little research has attempted to validate the accuracy of testing, nor measure the clinical or societal outcomes in families that follow the diagnostic investigation in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Schubert
- Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA), School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | - Joanne Milverton
- Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA), School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Stephen Goodall
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tracy Merlin
- Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA), School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marchionni E, Guadagnolo D, Mastromoro G, Pizzuti A. Prenatal Genome-Wide Sequencing analysis (Exome or Genome) in detecting pathogenic Single Nucleotide Variants in fetal Central Nervous System Anomalies: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Hum Genet 2024:10.1038/s41431-024-01590-2. [PMID: 38486024 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-024-01590-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Prenatal Exome (pES) or Genome (pGS) Sequencing analysis showed a significant incremental diagnostic yield over karyotype and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetal structural anomalies. Optimized indications and detection rates in different fetal anomalies are still under investigation. The aim of this study was to assess the incremental diagnostic yield in prenatally diagnosed Central Nervous System (CNS) anomalies. A systematic review on antenatal CNS anomalies was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, including n = 12 paper, accounting for 428 fetuses. Results were pooled in a meta-analysis fitting a logistic random mixed-effect model. The effect of interest was the incremental diagnostic rate of pES over karyotype/CMA in detecting likely pathogenic/pathogenic Single Nucleotide Variants (SNVs). A further meta-analysis adding the available pGS studies (including diagnostic coding SNVs only) and submeta-analysis on three CNS subcategories were also performed. The pooled incremental diagnostic yield estimate of pES studies was 38% (95% C.I.: [29%;47%]) and 36% (95% C.I.: [28%;45%]) when including diagnostic SNVs of pGS studies. The point estimate of the effect resulted 22% (95% C.I.: [15%;31%]) in apparently isolated anomalies, 33% (95% C.I.: [22%;46%]) in CNS-only related anomalies (≥1) and 46% (95% C.I.: [38%;55%]) in non-isolated anomalies (either ≥ 2 anomalies in CNS, or CNS and extra-CNS). Meta-analysis showed a substantial diagnostic improvement in performing Prenatal Genome-Wide Sequencing analysis (Exome or Genome) over karyotype and CMA in CNS anomalies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrica Marchionni
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - Daniele Guadagnolo
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Gioia Mastromoro
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Pizzuti
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Coghlan S, Gyngell C, Vears DF. Ethics of artificial intelligence in prenatal and pediatric genomic medicine. J Community Genet 2024; 15:13-24. [PMID: 37796364 PMCID: PMC10857992 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-023-00678-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This paper examines the ethics of introducing emerging forms of artificial intelligence (AI) into prenatal and pediatric genomic medicine. Application of genomic AI to these early life settings has not received much attention in the ethics literature. We focus on three contexts: (1) prenatal genomic sequencing for possible fetal abnormalities, (2) rapid genomic sequencing for critically ill children, and (3) reanalysis of genomic data obtained from children for diagnostic purposes. The paper identifies and discusses various ethical issues in the possible application of genomic AI in these settings, especially as they relate to concepts of beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, justice, transparency, accountability, privacy, and trust. The examination will inform the ethically sound introduction of genomic AI in early human life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Coghlan
- School of Computing and Information Systems (CIS), Centre for AI and Digital Ethics (CAIDE), The University of Melbourne, Grattan St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision Making and Society (ADM+S), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, 50 Flemington Rd, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia
| | - Danya F Vears
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, 50 Flemington Rd, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boardman F, Horn R. Not putting the cart before the horse: the complex social and ethical terrain of prenatal exome sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:134-135. [PMID: 36336716 PMCID: PMC9905600 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01225-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ruth Horn
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Ethics in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tran Mau-Them F, Delanne J, Denommé-Pichon AS, Safraou H, Bruel AL, Vitobello A, Garde A, Nambot S, Bourgon N, Racine C, Sorlin A, Moutton S, Marle N, Rousseau T, Sagot P, Simon E, Vincent-Delorme C, Boute O, Colson C, Petit F, Legendre M, Naudion S, Rooryck C, Prouteau C, Colin E, Guichet A, Ziegler A, Bonneau D, Morel G, Fradin M, Lavillaureix A, Quelin C, Pasquier L, Odent S, Vera G, Goldenberg A, Guerrot AM, Brehin AC, Putoux A, Attia J, Abel C, Blanchet P, Wells CF, Deiller C, Nizon M, Mercier S, Vincent M, Isidor B, Amiel J, Dard R, Godin M, Gruchy N, Jeanne M, Schaeffer E, Maillard PY, Payet F, Jacquemont ML, Francannet C, Sigaudy S, Bergot M, Tisserant E, Ascencio ML, Binquet C, Duffourd Y, Philippe C, Faivre L, Thauvin-Robinet C. Prenatal diagnosis by trio exome sequencing in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies: A powerful diagnostic tool. Front Genet 2023; 14:1099995. [PMID: 37035737 PMCID: PMC10076577 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1099995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Prenatal ultrasound (US) anomalies are detected in around 5%-10% of pregnancies. In prenatal diagnosis, exome sequencing (ES) diagnostic yield ranges from 6% to 80% depending on the inclusion criteria. We describe the first French national multicenter pilot study aiming to implement ES in prenatal diagnosis following the detection of anomalies on US. Patients and methods: We prospectively performed prenatal trio-ES in 150 fetuses with at least two US anomalies or one US anomaly known to be frequently linked to a genetic disorder. Trio-ES was only performed if the results could influence pregnancy management. Chromosomal microarray (CMA) was performed before or in parallel. Results: A causal diagnosis was identified in 52/150 fetuses (34%) with a median time to diagnosis of 28 days, which rose to 56/150 fetuses (37%) after additional investigation. Sporadic occurrences were identified in 34/56 (60%) fetuses and unfavorable vital and/or neurodevelopmental prognosis was made in 13/56 (24%) fetuses. The overall diagnostic yield was 41% (37/89) with first-line trio-ES versus 31% (19/61) after normal CMA. Trio-ES and CMA were systematically concordant for identification of pathogenic CNV. Conclusion: Trio-ES provided a substantial prenatal diagnostic yield, similar to postnatal diagnosis with a median turnaround of approximately 1 month, supporting its routine implementation during the detection of prenatal US anomalies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédéric Tran Mau-Them
- Unité Fonctionnelle Innovation en Diagnostic Génomique des Maladies Rares, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- INSERM UMR1231 GAD, F-21000, Dijon, France
- *Correspondence: Frédéric Tran Mau-Them,
| | - Julian Delanne
- Centre de Référence Maladies Rares “Anomalies Du Développement et Syndromes Malformatifs”, Centre de Génétique, FHU TRANSLAD et Institut GIMI, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Denommé-Pichon
- Unité Fonctionnelle Innovation en Diagnostic Génomique des Maladies Rares, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- INSERM UMR1231 GAD, F-21000, Dijon, France
| | - Hana Safraou
- Unité Fonctionnelle Innovation en Diagnostic Génomique des Maladies Rares, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- INSERM UMR1231 GAD, F-21000, Dijon, France
| | - Ange-Line Bruel
- Unité Fonctionnelle Innovation en Diagnostic Génomique des Maladies Rares, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- INSERM UMR1231 GAD, F-21000, Dijon, France
| | - Antonio Vitobello
- Unité Fonctionnelle Innovation en Diagnostic Génomique des Maladies Rares, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- INSERM UMR1231 GAD, F-21000, Dijon, France
| | - Aurore Garde
- Centre de Référence Maladies Rares “Anomalies Du Développement et Syndromes Malformatifs”, Centre de Génétique, FHU TRANSLAD et Institut GIMI, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Sophie Nambot
- Centre de Référence Maladies Rares “Anomalies Du Développement et Syndromes Malformatifs”, Centre de Génétique, FHU TRANSLAD et Institut GIMI, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Nicolas Bourgon
- Centre de Référence Maladies Rares “Anomalies Du Développement et Syndromes Malformatifs”, Centre de Génétique, FHU TRANSLAD et Institut GIMI, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Caroline Racine
- Centre de Référence Maladies Rares “Anomalies Du Développement et Syndromes Malformatifs”, Centre de Génétique, FHU TRANSLAD et Institut GIMI, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Arthur Sorlin
- INSERM UMR1231 GAD, F-21000, Dijon, France
- Centre de Référence Maladies Rares “Anomalies Du Développement et Syndromes Malformatifs”, Centre de Génétique, FHU TRANSLAD et Institut GIMI, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Sébastien Moutton
- Centre de Référence Maladies Rares “Anomalies Du Développement et Syndromes Malformatifs”, Centre de Génétique, FHU TRANSLAD et Institut GIMI, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Nathalie Marle
- Laboratoire Génétique Chromosomique et Moléculaire, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Thierry Rousseau
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Médecine Fœtale et Stérilité Conjugale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Paul Sagot
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Médecine Fœtale et Stérilité Conjugale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Emmanuel Simon
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Médecine Fœtale et Stérilité Conjugale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Catherine Vincent-Delorme
- CHU Lille, Clinique de Génétique Guy Fontaine, Centre de Référence Maladies Rares “Anomalies Du Développement et Syndromes Malformatifs” Nord-Ouest, FLille, France
| | - Odile Boute
- CHU Lille, Clinique de Génétique Guy Fontaine, Centre de Référence Maladies Rares “Anomalies Du Développement et Syndromes Malformatifs” Nord-Ouest, FLille, France
| | - Cindy Colson
- CHU Lille, Clinique de Génétique Guy Fontaine, Centre de Référence Maladies Rares “Anomalies Du Développement et Syndromes Malformatifs” Nord-Ouest, FLille, France
| | - Florence Petit
- CHU Lille, Clinique de Génétique Guy Fontaine, Centre de Référence Maladies Rares “Anomalies Du Développement et Syndromes Malformatifs” Nord-Ouest, FLille, France
| | - Marine Legendre
- CHU de Bordeaux, Service de Génétique Médicale, Bordeaux, France
| | - Sophie Naudion
- CHU de Bordeaux, Service de Génétique Médicale, Bordeaux, France
| | - Caroline Rooryck
- CHU de Bordeaux, Service de Génétique Médicale, Bordeaux, France
| | - Clément Prouteau
- Biochemistry and Genetics Department, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
| | - Estelle Colin
- Biochemistry and Genetics Department, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
| | - Agnès Guichet
- Biochemistry and Genetics Department, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
| | - Alban Ziegler
- Biochemistry and Genetics Department, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
| | - Dominique Bonneau
- Biochemistry and Genetics Department, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
| | - Godelieve Morel
- Service de Génétique Clinique, Centre de Référence Maladies Rares CLAD-Ouest, CHU Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France
| | - Mélanie Fradin
- Service de Génétique Clinique, Centre de Référence Maladies Rares CLAD-Ouest, CHU Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France
| | - Alinoé Lavillaureix
- Service de Génétique Clinique, Centre de Référence Maladies Rares CLAD-Ouest, CHU Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France
| | - Chloé Quelin
- Service de Génétique Clinique, Centre de Référence Maladies Rares CLAD-Ouest, CHU Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France
| | - Laurent Pasquier
- Service de Génétique Clinique, Centre de Référence Maladies Rares CLAD-Ouest, CHU Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France
| | - Sylvie Odent
- Service de Génétique Clinique, Centre de Référence Maladies Rares CLAD-Ouest, CHU Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France
| | - Gabriella Vera
- Service de Génétique—Unité de Génétique Clinique, Rouen, France
| | | | | | | | - Audrey Putoux
- Service de Génétique—GH Est-Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Lyon, France
| | | | - Carine Abel
- Service de Génétique et Centre de Diagnostic Anténatal, CHU de Lyon HCL—GH Nord-Hôpital de La Croix Rousse, Lyon, France
| | - Patricia Blanchet
- Equipe Maladies Génétiques de L’Enfant et de L’Adulte, Département Génétique Médicale, Maladies Rares et Médecine Personnalisée, CHU de Montpellier, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Constance F. Wells
- Equipe Maladies Génétiques de L’Enfant et de L’Adulte, Département Génétique Médicale, Maladies Rares et Médecine Personnalisée, CHU de Montpellier, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Caroline Deiller
- Equipe Maladies Génétiques de L’Enfant et de L’Adulte, Département Génétique Médicale, Maladies Rares et Médecine Personnalisée, CHU de Montpellier, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Mathilde Nizon
- CHU Nantes, Service de Génétique Médicale, Nantes, France
- Institut Du Thorax, INSERM, CNRS, UNIV Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Sandra Mercier
- CHU Nantes, Service de Génétique Médicale, Nantes, France
- Institut Du Thorax, INSERM, CNRS, UNIV Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Marie Vincent
- CHU Nantes, Service de Génétique Médicale, Nantes, France
- Institut Du Thorax, INSERM, CNRS, UNIV Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Bertrand Isidor
- CHU Nantes, Service de Génétique Médicale, Nantes, France
- Institut Du Thorax, INSERM, CNRS, UNIV Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Jeanne Amiel
- Equipe “Embryologie et Génétiques des Malformations Congénitales", Institut Imagine—INSERM U1163, Institut des Maladies Génétiques, Paris, France
- Service de Génétique Médicale et Clinique, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France
| | - Rodolphe Dard
- Unité Fonctionnelle de Génétique Médicale, Cytogénétique, Génétique Médicale et Biologie de La Reproduction, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France
| | - Manon Godin
- Service de Génétique, CHU Caen Clemenceau, EA 7450 Biotargen, University Caen, Caen, France
| | - Nicolas Gruchy
- Service de Génétique, CHU Caen Clemenceau, EA 7450 Biotargen, University Caen, Caen, France
| | - Médéric Jeanne
- Service de Génétique, CHU de Tours, Tours, France
- UMR 1253, IBrain, Université de Tours, Inserm, Tours, France
| | - Elise Schaeffer
- Service de Génétique Médicale, CHU de Strasbourg—Hôpital de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Maillard
- Service de Génétique Médicale, CHU de Strasbourg—Hôpital de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| | - Frédérique Payet
- Service de Génétique Médicale, Pôle Femme, Mère, Enfants CHU de La Réunion—GH Sud Réunion—Saint-Pierre, Saint-Pierre, France
| | - Marie-Line Jacquemont
- Service de Génétique Médicale, Pôle Femme, Mère, Enfants CHU de La Réunion—GH Sud Réunion—Saint-Pierre, Saint-Pierre, France
| | - Christine Francannet
- Service de Génétique Médicale, Pôle Femme et Enfant, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand—Hôpital D'Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Sabine Sigaudy
- Unité de Génétique Clinique Prénatale, Département de Génétique Médicale, CHU de Marseille—Hôpital de La Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Marine Bergot
- Unité Fonctionnelle Innovation en Diagnostic Génomique des Maladies Rares, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- INSERM UMR1231 GAD, F-21000, Dijon, France
| | | | - Marie-Laure Ascencio
- Centre D'Investigation Clinique CIC-EC Inserm CIC1432, UFR des Sciences de Santé, Université de Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Christine Binquet
- Centre D'Investigation Clinique CIC-EC Inserm CIC1432, UFR des Sciences de Santé, Université de Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Yannis Duffourd
- Unité Fonctionnelle Innovation en Diagnostic Génomique des Maladies Rares, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- INSERM UMR1231 GAD, F-21000, Dijon, France
| | - Christophe Philippe
- Unité Fonctionnelle Innovation en Diagnostic Génomique des Maladies Rares, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- INSERM UMR1231 GAD, F-21000, Dijon, France
| | - Laurence Faivre
- INSERM UMR1231 GAD, F-21000, Dijon, France
- Centre de Référence Maladies Rares “Anomalies Du Développement et Syndromes Malformatifs”, Centre de Génétique, FHU TRANSLAD et Institut GIMI, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Christel Thauvin-Robinet
- Unité Fonctionnelle Innovation en Diagnostic Génomique des Maladies Rares, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- INSERM UMR1231 GAD, F-21000, Dijon, France
- Centre de Référence Maladies Rares “Anomalies Du Développement et Syndromes Malformatifs”, Centre de Génétique, FHU TRANSLAD et Institut GIMI, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mastromoro G, Guadagnolo D, Khaleghi Hashemian N, Bernardini L, Giancotti A, Piacentini G, De Luca A, Pizzuti A. A Pain in the Neck: Lessons Learnt from Genetic Testing in Fetuses Detected with Nuchal Fluid Collections, Increased Nuchal Translucency versus Cystic Hygroma-Systematic Review of the Literature, Meta-Analysis and Case Series. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 13:diagnostics13010048. [PMID: 36611340 PMCID: PMC9818917 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13010048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Fetal Nuchal fluid collections can manifest with two distinct presentations attributable to the same phenotypic spectrum: increased nuchal translucency (iNT) and cystic hygroma. The prenatal detection of these findings should prompt an accurate assessment through genetic counseling and testing, including karyotype, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and multigene RASopathy panel. We performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, to calculate diagnostic yields of genetic testing in fetuses with iNT and cystic hygroma. We compared the results with a cohort of 96 fetuses with these isolated findings. Fetuses with isolated NT ≥ 2.5 mm showed karyotype anomalies in 22.76% of cases and CMA presented an incremental detection rate of 2.35%. Fetuses with isolated NT ≥ 3 mm presented aneuploidies in 14.36% of cases and CMA had an incremental detection rate of 3.89%. When the isolated NT measured at least 3.5 mm the diagnostic yield of karyotyping was 34.35%, the incremental CMA detection rate was 4.1%, the incremental diagnostic rate of the RASopathy panel was 1.44% and it was 2.44% for exome sequencing. Interestingly, CMA presents a considerable diagnostic yield in the group of fetuses with NT ≥ 3.5 mm. Similarly, exome sequencing appears to show promising results and could be considered after a negative CMA result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gioia Mastromoro
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina–Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence: or
| | - Daniele Guadagnolo
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Laura Bernardini
- Cytogenetics Unit, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Foundation, San Giovanni Rotondo, 71013 Foggia, Italy
| | - Antonella Giancotti
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Gerardo Piacentini
- Department of Neonatology and Fetal Cardiology, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina–Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro De Luca
- Medical Genetics Division, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Antonio Pizzuti
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fu F, Li R, Yu Q, Wang D, Deng Q, Li L, Lei T, Chen G, Nie Z, Yang X, Han J, Pan M, Zhen L, Zhang Y, Jing X, Li F, Li F, Zhang L, Yi C, Li Y, Lu Y, Zhou H, Cheng K, Li J, Xiang L, Zhang J, Tang S, Fang P, Li D, Liao C. Application of exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies: clinical experience and lessons learned from a cohort of 1618 fetuses. Genome Med 2022; 14:123. [PMID: 36307859 PMCID: PMC9615232 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-022-01130-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Exome sequencing (ES) is becoming more widely available in prenatal diagnosis. However, data on its clinical utility and integration into clinical management remain limited in practice. Herein, we report our experience implementing prenatal ES (pES) in a large cohort of fetuses with anomalies detected by ultrasonography using a hospital-based in-house multidisciplinary team (MDT) facilitated by a three-step genotype-driven followed by phenotype-driven analysis framework. Methods We performed pES in 1618 fetal cases with positive ultrasound findings but negative for karyotyping and chromosome microarray analysis between January 2014 and October 2021, including both retrospective (n=565) and prospective (n=1053) cohorts. The diagnostic efficiency and its correlation to organ systems involved, phenotypic spectrum, and the clinical impacts of pES results on pregnancy outcomes were analyzed. Results A genotype-driven followed by phenotype-driven three-step approach was carried out in all trio pES. Step 1, a genotype-driven analysis resulted in a diagnostic rate of 11.6% (187/1618). Step 2, a phenotype-driven comprehensive analysis yielded additional diagnostic findings for another 28 cases (1.7%; 28/1618). In the final step 3, data reanalyses based on new phenotypes and/or clinical requests found molecular diagnosis in 14 additional cases (0.9%; 14/1618). Altogether, 229 fetal cases (14.2%) received a molecular diagnosis, with a higher positive rate in the retrospective than the prospective cohort (17.3% vs. 12.4%, p<0.01). The diagnostic rates were highest in fetuses with skeletal anomalies (30.4%) and multiple organ involvements (25.9%), and lowest in fetuses with chest anomalies (0%). In addition, incidental and secondary findings with childhood-onset disorders were detected in 11 (0.7%) cases. Furthermore, we described the prenatal phenotypes for the first time for 27 gene-associated conditions (20.0%, 27/135) upon a systematic analysis of the diagnosed cases and expanded the phenotype spectrum for 26 (19.3%) genes where limited fetal phenotypic information was available. In the prospective cohort, the combined prenatal ultrasound and pES results had significantly impacted the clinical decisions (61.5%, 648/1053). Conclusions The genotype-driven approach could identify about 81.7% positive cases (11.6% of the total cohort) with the initial limited fetal phenotype information considered. The following two steps of phenotype-driven analysis and data reanalyses helped us find the causative variants in an additional 2.6% of the entire cohort (18.3% of all positive findings). Our extensive phenotype analysis on a large number of molecularly confirmed prenatal cases had greatly enriched our current knowledge on fetal phenotype-genotype correlation, which may guide more focused prenatal ultrasound in the future. This is by far the largest pES cohort study that combines a robust trio sequence data analysis, systematic phenotype-genotype correlation, and well-established MDT in a single prenatal clinical setting. This work underlines the value of pES as an essential component in prenatal diagnosis in guiding medical management and parental decision making. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13073-022-01130-x.
Collapse
|
9
|
Yaron Y, Ofen Glassner V, Mory A, Zunz Henig N, Kurolap A, Bar Shira A, Brabbing Goldstein D, Marom D, Ben Sira L, Baris Feldman H, Malinger G, Krajden Haratz K, Reches A. Exome sequencing as first-tier test for fetuses with severe central nervous system structural anomalies. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2022; 60:59-67. [PMID: 35229910 PMCID: PMC9328397 DOI: 10.1002/uog.24885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Prenatally detected central nervous system (CNS) anomalies present a diagnostic challenge. In this study, we compared the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetuses with a major CNS anomaly. METHODS This was a retrospective study of 114 cases referred for genetic evaluation following termination of pregnancy (TOP) due to a major CNS anomaly detected on prenatal ultrasound. All fetuses were first analyzed by CMA. All CMA-negative cases were offered ES. CMA-positive cases were reanalyzed using ES to assess its ability to detect copy-number variants (CNVs). RESULTS CMA identified a pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) CNV in 11/114 (10%) cases. Eighty-six CMA-negative cases were analyzed using ES, which detected P/LP sequence variants in 38/86 (44%). Among recurrent cases (i.e. cases with a previously affected pregnancy), the incidence of P/LP sequence variants was non-significantly higher compared with non-recurrent ones (12/19 (63%) vs 26/67 (39%); P = 0.06). Among the 38 cases with an ES diagnosis, 20 (53%) were inherited and carried a significant risk of recurrence. Reanalysis of 10 CMA-positive cases by ES demonstrated that the bioinformatics pipeline used for sequence variant analysis also detected all P/LP CNVs, as well as three previously known non-causative CNVs. CONCLUSIONS In our study, ES provided a high diagnostic yield (> 50%) in fetuses with severe CNS structural anomalies, which may have been partly due to the highly selected case series that included post-TOP cases from a specialist referral center. These data suggest that ES may be considered as a first-tier test for the prenatal diagnosis of major fetal CNS anomalies, detecting both P/LP sequence variants and CNVs. This is of particular importance given the time constraints of an ongoing pregnancy and the risk of recurrence in future pregnancies. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y. Yaron
- Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis UnitGenetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel AvivIsrael
- Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
| | - V. Ofen Glassner
- Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis UnitGenetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel AvivIsrael
| | - A. Mory
- Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis UnitGenetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel AvivIsrael
| | - N. Zunz Henig
- Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis UnitGenetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel AvivIsrael
| | - A. Kurolap
- Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis UnitGenetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel AvivIsrael
| | - A. Bar Shira
- Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis UnitGenetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel AvivIsrael
| | - D. Brabbing Goldstein
- Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis UnitGenetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel AvivIsrael
- Division of Obstetric Ultrasound, Lis Maternity HospitalTel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel AvivIsrael
| | - D. Marom
- Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis UnitGenetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel AvivIsrael
- Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
| | - L. Ben Sira
- Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
- Radiology DepartmentTel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel AvivIsrael
| | - H. Baris Feldman
- Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis UnitGenetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel AvivIsrael
- Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
| | - G. Malinger
- Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
- Division of Obstetric Ultrasound, Lis Maternity HospitalTel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel AvivIsrael
| | - K. Krajden Haratz
- Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
- Division of Obstetric Ultrasound, Lis Maternity HospitalTel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel AvivIsrael
| | - A. Reches
- Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis UnitGenetics Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel AvivIsrael
- Division of Obstetric Ultrasound, Lis Maternity HospitalTel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel AvivIsrael
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Giordano JL, Cgc, Wapner RJ. The Fetal Sequencing Consortium (FSC): The value of multidisciplinary dialogue and collaboration. Prenat Diagn 2022; 42:807-810. [PMID: 35661204 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies is entering a new phase due to advances in diagnostic sequencing. The creation of an international, multi-disciplinary Fetal Sequencing Consortium (FSC) has provided a forum for regular dialogue and collaboration between diverse clinicians and scientists focused on the interpretation and understanding of sequencing results. The creation of an international fetal sequencing repository utilizing the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) standards will further expand our ability to clinically interpret the fetal genome, advancing both clinical care and scientific discovery. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Giordano
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Obstetrics and Gynecology New York, New York, New York, US
| | | | - Ronald J Wapner
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Obstetrics and Gynecology New York, New York, New York, US
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kernie CG, Wynn J, Rosenbaum A, de Voest J, Galloway S, Giordano J, Stover S, Westerfield L, Gilmore K, Wapner RJ, Van den Veyver IB, Vora NL, Clifton RG, Caughey AB, Chung WK. Information is power: The experiences, attitudes and needs of individuals who chose to have prenatal genomic sequencing for fetal anomalies. Prenat Diagn 2022; 42:947-954. [PMID: 35476893 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study sought to evaluate the experiences of individuals who chose to participate in a study and receive prenatal genomic sequencing (pGS) for fetuses with congenital structural anomalies. METHOD Individuals who received research results of prenatal sequencing were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews about their experiences. A constructivist grounded theory approach was used to code and analyze interviews. RESULTS Thirty-three participants from 27 pregnancies were interviewed. Participants were motivated to enroll in the study to find out more about their fetus' condition and prepare for the future. The waiting period was a time of significant anxiety for participants. Most participants felt relief and closure upon receiving results, regardless of the category of result, and had a clear understanding of the implications of the results. CONCLUSION Participants' experiences with pGS were often intertwined with the experience of having a fetus with an abnormality. Participants were satisfied with the decision to participate in research and the support they received from the healthcare team, although waiting for results was associated with anxiety. The healthcare team plays an integral role in setting expectations and validating feelings of anxiety, fear and uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine G Kernie
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Julia Wynn
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Allison Rosenbaum
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jessica de Voest
- George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Stephanie Galloway
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jessica Giordano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Samantha Stover
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lauren Westerfield
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly Gilmore
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ronald J Wapner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ignatia B Van den Veyver
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neeta L Vora
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rebecca G Clifton
- George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Aaron B Caughey
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mastromoro G, Khaleghi Hashemian N, Guadagnolo D, Giuffrida MG, Torres B, Bernardini L, Ventriglia F, Piacentini G, Pizzuti A. Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Fetuses Detected with Isolated Cardiovascular Malformation: A Multicenter Study, Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12061328. [PMID: 35741137 PMCID: PMC9221891 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12061328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular malformations (CVM) represent the most common structural anomalies, occurring in 0.7% of live births. The CVM prenatal suspicion should prompt an accurate investigation with fetal echocardiography and the assessment through genetic counseling and testing. In particular, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) allows the identification of copy number variations. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature, studying the incremental diagnostic yield of CMA in fetal isolated CVM, scoring yields for each category of heart disease, with the aim of guiding genetic counseling and prenatal management. At the same time, we report 59 fetuses with isolated CVM with normal karyotype who underwent CMA. The incremental CMA diagnostic yield in fetuses with isolated CVM was 5.79% (CI 5.54–6.04), with conotruncal malformations showing the higher detection rate (15.93%). The yields for ventricular septal defects and aberrant right subclavian artery were the lowest (2.64% and 0.66%). Other CVM ranged from 4.42% to 6.67%. In the retrospective cohort, the diagnostic yield was consistent with literature data, with an overall CMA diagnostic yield of 3.38%. CMA in the prenatal setting was confirmed as a valuable tool for investigating the causes of fetal cardiovascular malformations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gioia Mastromoro
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (N.K.H.); (D.G.); (A.P.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Nader Khaleghi Hashemian
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (N.K.H.); (D.G.); (A.P.)
| | - Daniele Guadagnolo
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (N.K.H.); (D.G.); (A.P.)
| | - Maria Grazia Giuffrida
- Cytogenetics Unit, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Foundation, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy; (M.G.G.); (B.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Barbara Torres
- Cytogenetics Unit, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Foundation, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy; (M.G.G.); (B.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Laura Bernardini
- Cytogenetics Unit, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Foundation, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy; (M.G.G.); (B.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Flavia Ventriglia
- Department of Pediatrics, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy;
- Santa Maria Goretti Hospital, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | - Gerardo Piacentini
- Fetal and Pediatric Cardiology Unit, “San Giovanni Calibita” Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina Hospital, 00186 Rome, Italy;
- Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, “San Giovanni Calibita” Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina Hospital, 00186 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Pizzuti
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (N.K.H.); (D.G.); (A.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Maya I, Salzer Sheelo L, Brabbing-Goldstein D, Matar R, Kahana S, Agmon-Fishman I, Klein C, Gurevitch M, Basel-Salmon L, Sagi-Dain L. Residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants in low-risk pregnancies, following exclusion of noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:562.e1-562.e8. [PMID: 34762861 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chromosomal microarray analysis detects a clinically significant amount of copy number variants in approximately 1% of low-risk pregnancies. As the constantly growing use of noninvasive prenatal screening has facilitated the detection of chromosomal aberrations, defining the rate of abnormal chromosomal microarray analysis findings following normal noninvasive prenatal screening is of importance for making informed decisions regarding prenatal testing and screening options. OBJECTIVE To calculate the residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants following theoretically normal noninvasive prenatal screening. STUDY DESIGN The chromosomal microarray results of all pregnancies undergoing amniocentesis between the years 2013 and 2021 in a large hospital-based laboratory were collected. Pregnancies with sonographic anomalies, abnormal maternal serum screening, or multiple fetuses were excluded. Clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) copy number variants were divided into the following: 3-noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable (trisomies 13, 18, and 21), 5- noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable (including sex chromosome aberrations), 5-noninvasive prenatal screening and common microdeletion-detectable (including 1p36.3-1p36.2, 4p16.3-4p16.2, 5p15.3-5p15.1, 15q11.2-15q13.1, and 22q11.2 deletions), and genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable (including variants >7 Mb). The theoretical residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants was calculated following the exclusion of noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable findings. RESULTS Of the 7235 pregnancies, clinically significant copy number variants were demonstrated in 87 cases (1.2%). The residual risk following theoretically normal noninvasive prenatal screening was 1.07% (1/94) for 3-noninvasive prenatal screening, 0.78% (1/129) for 5- noninvasive prenatal screening, 0.74% (1/136) for 5- noninvasive prenatal screening including common microdeletions, and 0.68% (1/147) for genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening. In the subgroup of 4048 pregnancies with advanced maternal age, the residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants following theoretically normal noninvasive prenatal screening ranged from 1.36% (1/73) for 3- noninvasive prenatal screening to 0.82% (1/122) for genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening. In 3187 pregnancies of women <35 years, this residual risk ranged from 0.69% (1/145) for 3- noninvasive prenatal screening to 0.5% (1/199) for genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening. CONCLUSION The residual risk of clinically significant copy number variants in pregnancies without structural sonographic anomalies is appreciable and depends on the noninvasive prenatal screening extent and maternal age. This knowledge is important for the patients, obstetricians, and genetic counselors to facilitate informed decisions regarding prenatal testing and screening options.
Collapse
|
14
|
Mastromoro G, Guadagnolo D, Khaleghi Hashemian N, Marchionni E, Traversa A, Pizzuti A. Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:575. [PMID: 35328129 PMCID: PMC8947110 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Fetal malformations occur in 2-3% of pregnancies. They require invasive procedures for cytogenetics and molecular testing. "Structural anomalies" include non-transient anatomic alterations. "Soft markers" are often transient minor ultrasound findings. Anomalies not fitting these definitions are categorized as "dynamic". This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic yield and the rates of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) in fetuses undergoing molecular testing (chromosomal microarray (CMA), exome sequencing (ES), genome sequencing (WGS)) due to ultrasound findings. The CMA diagnostic yield was 2.15% in single soft markers (vs. 0.79% baseline risk), 3.44% in multiple soft markers, 3.66% in single structural anomalies and 8.57% in multiple structural anomalies. Rates for specific subcategories vary significantly. ES showed a diagnostic rate of 19.47%, reaching 27.47% in multiple structural anomalies. WGS data did not allow meta-analysis. In fetal structural anomalies, CMA is a first-tier test, but should be integrated with karyotype and parental segregations. In this class of fetuses, ES presents a very high incremental yield, with a significant VUSs burden, so we encourage its use in selected cases. Soft markers present heterogeneous CMA results from each other, some of them with risks comparable to structural anomalies, and would benefit from molecular analysis. The diagnostic rate of multiple soft markers poses a solid indication to CMA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gioia Mastromoro
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (D.G.); (N.K.H.); (E.M.); (A.T.); (A.P.)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mellis R, Oprych K, Scotchman E, Hill M, Chitty LS. Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prenat Diagn 2022; 42:662-685. [PMID: 35170059 PMCID: PMC9325531 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Objectives We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to determine the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) for prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies, where karyotype/chromosomal microarray (CMA) is normal. Methods Following electronic searches of four databases, we included studies with ≥10 structurally abnormal fetuses undergoing ES or whole genome sequencing. The incremental diagnostic yield of ES over CMA/karyotype was calculated and pooled in a meta‐analysis. Sub‐group analyses investigated effects of case selection and fetal phenotype on diagnostic yield. Results We identified 72 reports from 66 studies, representing 4350 fetuses. The pooled incremental yield of ES was 31% (95% confidence interval (CI) 26%–36%, p < 0.0001). Diagnostic yield was significantly higher for cases pre‐selected for likelihood of monogenic aetiology compared to unselected cases (42% vs. 15%, p < 0.0001). Diagnostic yield differed significantly between phenotypic sub‐groups, ranging from 53% (95% CI 42%–63%, p < 0.0001) for isolated skeletal abnormalities, to 2% (95% CI 0%–5%, p = 0.04) for isolated increased nuchal translucency. Conclusion Prenatal ES provides a diagnosis in an additional 31% of structurally abnormal fetuses when CMA/karyotype is non‐diagnostic. The expected diagnostic yield depends on the body system(s) affected and can be optimised by pre‐selection of cases following multi‐disciplinary review to determine that a monogenic cause is likely.
What's already known about this topic?
Prenatal exome sequencing (ES) increases genetic diagnoses in fetuses with structural abnormalities and a normal karyotype and chromosomal microarray. Published diagnostic yields from ES are varied and may be influenced by study size, case selection and fetal phenotype.
What does this study add?
This study provides a comprehensive systematic review of the literature to date and investigates the diagnostic yield of ES for a range of isolated system anomalies, to support clinical decision‐making on how to offer prenatal ES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhiannon Mellis
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory HubGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Genetics and Genomic MedicineUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthLondonUK
| | | | - Elizabeth Scotchman
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory HubGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Melissa Hill
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory HubGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Genetics and Genomic MedicineUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthLondonUK
| | - Lyn S Chitty
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory HubGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Genetics and Genomic MedicineUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hart AR, Vasudevan C, Griffiths PD, Foulds N, Piercy H, de Lacy P, Boxall S, Howe D, Vollmer B. Antenatal counselling for prospective parents whose fetus has a neurological anomaly: part 2, risks of adverse outcome in common anomalies. Dev Med Child Neurol 2022; 64:23-39. [PMID: 34482539 DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.15043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2020] [Revised: 07/31/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
After diagnosis of a fetal neurological anomaly, prospective parents want to know the best and worst-case scenarios and an estimation of the risk to their infant of having an atypical developmental outcome. The literature on developmental outcomes for fetal neurological anomalies is poor: studies are characterized by retrospective design, small sample size, often no standardized assessment of development, and differing definitions of anomalies. This review provides an aide-memoir on the risks of adverse neurodevelopmental outcome for ventriculomegaly, cortical anomalies, microcephaly, macrocephaly, agenesis of the corpus callosum, posterior fossa anomalies, and myelomeningocele, to assist healthcare professionals in counselling. The data in this review should be used alongside recommendations on counselling and service design described in part 1 to provide antenatal counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony R Hart
- Department of Perinatal and Paediatric Neurology, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Ryegate Children's Centre, Sheffield, UK
| | - Chakra Vasudevan
- Department of Neonatology, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
| | - Paul D Griffiths
- Academic Unit of Radiology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Nicola Foulds
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Princess Anne Hospital, University Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Hilary Piercy
- The Centre for Health and Social Care, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Patricia de Lacy
- Department of Paediatric Neuosurgery, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sally Boxall
- Wessex Fetal Medicine Unit, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - David Howe
- Wessex Fetal Medicine Unit, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Brigitte Vollmer
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Paediatric and Neonatal Neurology, Southampton Children's Hospital, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Vaknin N, Azoulay N, Tsur E, Tripolszki K, Urzi A, Rolfs A, Bauer P, Achiron R, Lipitz S, Goldberg Y, Berger R, Shohat M. High rate of abnormal findings in Prenatal Exome Trio in low risk pregnancies and apparently normal fetuses. Prenat Diagn 2021; 42:725-735. [PMID: 34918830 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Data on the value of exome sequencing in fetuses with no structural anomalies are limited, especially in the early stages of pregnancy and in low risk pregnancies. We investigated the yield of targeted clinical prenatal trio exome sequencing (pES) in pregnancies with and without fetal structural anomalies. METHODS We performed pES in 353 pregnancies: Group 1 included 143 pregnancies with high clinical suspicion for a genetic disease: pregnancies with increased nuchal translucency, ultrasound structural defects, intrauterine growth restriction, polyhydramnios, or effusion/nuchal edema. Group 2 included 210 pregnancies with no notable abnormal fetal ultrasound findings. 2a. Low risk pregnancies with minor ultrasound findings, referred to the geneticist due to mildly increased risk for genetic disease (50); and 2b. Normal pregnancy surveillance (160). RESULTS Overall, 26 (7.36%) fetal analyses had pathogenic (P)/likely pathogenic (LP) variants. In group 1, 20/143 (13.99%) cases had P/LP variants. In group 2, 6/210 (2.86%) cases were found to have P/LP variants [5/50 in (2a) and 1/160 in (2b)]. CONCLUSION These results show a high rate of abnormal findings on pES even in apparently normal pregnancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noam Vaknin
- The Genetic Institute of Maccabi Health Services, Rehovot, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Noy Azoulay
- The Genetic Institute of Maccabi Health Services, Rehovot, Israel.,Raphael Recanati Genetics Institute, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Erez Tsur
- The Genetic Institute of Maccabi Health Services, Rehovot, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | - Reuven Achiron
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Shlomo Lipitz
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Yael Goldberg
- The Genetic Institute of Maccabi Health Services, Rehovot, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Raphael Recanati Genetics Institute, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Rachel Berger
- The Genetic Institute of Maccabi Health Services, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Mordechai Shohat
- The Genetic Institute of Maccabi Health Services, Rehovot, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Bioinformatics Unit, Cancer Research Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| |
Collapse
|