Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Opioids in Patients with Solid Tumours: Is Their Association Safe? A Systematic Literature Review

Peripheral blood inflammatory biomarkers neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index/albumin ratio predict prognosis and efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy and opioids

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to assess the value of pretreatment peripheral blood neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and systemic immune-inflammation index/albumin ratio (SII/ALB) for predicting immunotherapy prognosis and efficacy in Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) treated with Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and opioids.

METHODS

A total of 78 NSCLC patients received ICIs and opioids were retrospectively collected. The optimal cut-off values were determined by receiver operating characteristic curves. The univariate and multivariate analysis investigated the effects of NLR, PLR, and SII/ALB on patients prognosis.

RESULTS

NLR and PLR had predictive value of efficacy. SII/ALB > 17.79 was an independent risk factor for worse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

PLR and SII/ALB have predictive value of efficacy, but NLR was not. SII/ALB > 17.79 suggests a poor prognosis following immunotherapy in NSCLC patients receiving ICIs and opioids.

The impact of cannabis on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a systematic review of immunomodulatory effects of cannabis in patients with and without cancer

PURPOSE

Cannabis is commonly used among patients with cancer for palliative benefit. As the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for cancer therapy increases, there is concern about potential interactions between ICIs and cannabis. Preclinical studies suggest that cannabis leads to immunosuppression, which could impair the function of ICIs. However, only a few clinical studies have investigated this relationship. The goal of this review is to synthesize reported immunomodulatory effects of cannabis in patients with and without cancer in order to better understand whether these preclinical findings translate to the clinical space.

METHODS

A database search was conducted through Ovid Medline to identify relevant articles. Clinical studies investigating cannabis use in humans and the immune system were included. Preclinical studies and case studies were excluded. Information pertaining to immune changes with cannabis exposure was abstracted.

RESULTS

Forty studies met inclusion criteria, including 9 randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Analysis of immune-related markers demonstrated no change in cytokines, T-cell counts, and CRP in most studies with cannabis exposure. Among patients with autoimmune diseases, cannabis use showed improvements in clinical symptoms even while objective laboratory immune markers remained unchanged.

CONCLUSION

We did not find evidence of meaningful changes in immune parameters with cannabis use in the clinical setting across multiple diseases. In particular, immune markers relevant to ICI function did not appear to be associated with cannabis use. This evidence may provide some reassurance to patients and oncologists contemplating concomitant cannabis use with ICIs; however, additional well-controlled prospective studies are warranted in this setting.

Association of opioid use with survival in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: it is time for evidence-based behaviors

Cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with pain experienced by most patients undergoing cancer treatment. Opioids are the recommended treatment for cancer pain management, but recent studies suggest a negative association between opioid use and survival rates among patients undergoing immunotherapy. However, conclusions cannot be drawn regarding causality from these observational data. Immunotherapy, which boosts the body's immune system to fight cancer cells, has emerged as a promising treatment option for all types of cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can activate the anticancer function of exhausted T cells and have shown remarkable survival benefits in patients with multiple malignancies. However, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that the use of opioids during ICI treatment has an adverse effect on patient prognosis, while the use of NSAIDs is not significantly associated with the prognosis in patients treated with ICIs. These reviews have major limitations due to the retrospective nature of the studies and the multiple factors that can influence the phenomenon. Therefore, caution is required when interpreting results from retrospective data on drug interactions. The findings of this study are alarming and potentially harmful to patients with cancer suffering from pain or other symptoms requiring opioid drugs.

Effect of hyperthermia combined with opioids on cancer pain control and surgical stress in patients with gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgical palliative surgery is a common method for treating patients with middle and late stage gastrointestinal tumors. However, these patients generally experience high levels of cancer pain, which can in turn stimulate the body's stress and undermine the effect of external surgery. Although opioid drugs have a significantly positive effect on controlling cancer pain, they can induce adverse drug reactions and potential damage to the body 's immune function. Hyperthermia therapy produces a thermal effect that shrinks tumor tissues. However, its effect on relieving the pain of middle and late stage gastrointestinal tumors but also the stress of surgical palliative surgery remains unclear.

AIM

To investigate the effect of hyperthermia combined with opioids on controlling cancer pain in patients with middle and late stage gastrointestinal cancer and evaluate its impact on surgical palliative surgical stress.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study using the data of 70 patients with middle and late stage gastrointestinal tumors who underwent cancer pain treatment and surgical palliative surgery in the Ninth People 's Hospital of Suzhou, China from January 2021 to June 2024. Patients were grouped according to different cancer pain control regimens before surgical palliative surgery, with n = 35 cases in each group, as follows: Patients who solely used opioid drugs to control cancer pain were included in Group S, while patients who received hyperthermia treatment combined with opioid drugs were included in Group L. In both groups, we compared the effectiveness of cancer pain control (pain score, burst pain score, 24-hour burst pain frequency, immune function, daily dosage of opioid drugs, and adverse reactions), surgical palliative indicators (surgery time, intraoperative bleeding, stress response), and postoperative recovery time, including first oral feeding time, postoperative hospital stay).

RESULTS

Analgesic treatment resulted in a significant decrease in the average pain score, burst pain score, and 24-hour burst pain frequency in both Groups L and S; however, these scores were statistically significantly lower in Group L than in Group S group (P < 0.001). Analgesic treatment also resulted in significant differences, namely serum CD4+ (29.18 ± 5.64 vs 26.05 ± 4.76, P = 0.014), CD8+ (26.28 ± 3.75 vs 29.23 ± 3.89, P = 0.002), CD4+/CD8+ (0.97 ± 0.12 vs 0.83 ± 0.17, P < 0.001), between Group L and Group S, respectively. The daily dosage of opioid drugs incidence of adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, and difficulty urinating were statistically significantly lower in Group L than those in group S (P < 0.05). Furthermore, palliative surgery time and intraoperative blood loss in Group L were slightly lower than those in Group S; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). On the first day after surgery, serum cortisol and C-reactive protein levels of patients in group L and group S were 161.43 ± 21.07 vs 179.35 ± 27.86 ug/L (P = 0.003) and 10.51 ± 2.05 vs 13.49 ± 2.17 mg/L (P < 0.001), respectively. Finally, the first oral feeding time and hospitalization time after surgery in group L were statistically significantly shorter than those in group S (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings showed that hyperthermia combined with opioids is effective in controlling cancer pain in patients with middle and late stage gastrointestinal tumors. Furthermore, this method can reduce the dosage of opioids used and minimize potential adverse drug reactions, reduce the patient's surgical palliative surgical stress response, and shorten the overall postoperative recovery time required.

Morphine treatment restricts response to immunotherapy in oral squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are becoming the standard of care for recurrent and metastatic cancer. Opioids, the primary treatment for cancer-related pain, are immunosuppressive raising concerns about their potential to interfere with the efficacy of ICIs. We hypothesize that exogenous opioids given for analgesia suppress antitumor immunity via T cell-mediated mu opioid receptor 1 (OPRM1) signaling.

METHODS

In silico bioinformatics were used to assess OPRM1 receptor expression on tumor-infiltrating immune cells in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and across different cancer types. A syngeneic orthotopic mouse model of oral squamous cell carcinoma was used to study the impact of morphine and OPRM1 antagonism on tumor-infiltrating immune cells, tumor growth and antitumor efficacy of anti-Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody treatment.

RESULTS

In patients with HNSCC, OPRM1 expression was most abundant in CD8+ T cells, particularly in patients who had not been prescribed opioids prior to resection and exhibited increased expression of exhaustion markers. Exogenous morphine treatment in tumor-bearing mice reduced CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell infiltration and subsequently anti-PD1 ICI efficacy. Peripherally acting mu opioid receptor antagonism, when administered in the adjunctive setting, was able to block morphine-induced immunosuppression and recover the antitumor efficacy of anti-PD1.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that morphine acts via a peripheral OPRM1-mediated mechanism to suppress CD8+ T cells, thereby fostering a pro-tumor-impaired immune response. Importantly, peripherally-restricted OPRM1 antagonism can effectively block this morphine-induced immunosuppression while still allowing for centrally-mediated analgesia, indicating a potential therapeutic strategy for mitigating the adverse effects of opioid pain relief in cancer treatment.

Total pain, opioids, and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the survival of patients with cancer

Experimental and observational studies have shown that opioid analgesics may increase tumor growth, potentially reduce immunotherapy efficacy, and shorten survival. As a result of the lack of clinical data, the current rationale for continuing opioid analgesic treatment is based on animal models, which suggests that physical pain itself may potentially influence cancer growth and exert immunosuppressive effects. Total pain encompasses the various factors that patients may experience during their cancer journey: physical symptoms, social isolation/loneliness, psychological, spiritual/existential, and financial distress. These need to be screened and discussed with patients to help them cope with the treatment and disease. As each issue may affect survival, it is essential to identify them to understand how they might affect the patient's immune system, influence immunotherapy outcomes, and ultimately, survival. The question arises whether a single factor, such as the combination of opioids and immune checkpoint inhibitors, negatively affects treatment outcomes. While there is a risk of fostering opioid phobia, the complex interplay between total pain, quality of life, and the immune system must be considered. Thus, in studies that appropriately investigate the interactions between opioid analgesics and the immune system, it is essential to consider all the distress factors that patients may experience at each stage of their illness.

Effects of opioid drugs on immune function in cancer patients

Opioid receptor agonists are often used when cancer patients undergo surgery or analgesic treatment. As analgesics in clinical care, opioids can provide intraoperative or to chronic cancer pain relief. Immune function plays an important role in anti-cancer therapy, with cellular immunity, comprised principally of T-lymphocytes and natural killer cells, representing the primary anti-cancer immune response. However, it remains unclear whether immune function is further affected with the use of opioids in already immunocompromised cancer patients. This article provides a review of the effects of commonly used clinical opioids, including morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl and tramadol, on immune function in cancer patients. It provides a summary of current evidence regarding the immunomodulatory effects of opioids in the cancer setting and mechanisms underlying these interactions.

Opioids and Cancer: Current Understanding and Clinical Considerations

Pain is one of the most common symptoms in patients with cancer. Pain not only negatively affects the quality of life of patients with cancer, but it has also been associated with reduced survival. Pain management is therefore a critical component of cancer care. Prescription opioids remain the first-line approach for the management of moderate-to-severe pain associated with cancer. However, there has been increasing interest in understanding whether these analgesics could impact cancer progression. Furthermore, epidemiological data link a possible association between prescription opioid usage and cancer development. Until more robust evidence is available, patients with cancer with moderate-to-severe pain may receive opioids to decrease suffering. However, future studies should be conducted to evaluate the role of opioids and opioid receptors in specific cancers.

Opioid analgesics for nociceptive cancer pain: A comprehensive review

Pain is one of the most burdensome symptoms in people with cancer, and opioid analgesics are considered the mainstay of cancer pain management. For this review, the authors evaluated the efficacy and toxicities of opioid analgesics compared with placebo, other opioids, nonopioid analgesics, and nonpharmacologic treatments for background cancer pain (continuous and relatively constant pain present at rest), and breakthrough cancer pain (transient exacerbation of pain despite stable and adequately controlled background pain). They found a paucity of placebo-controlled trials for background cancer pain, although tapentadol or codeine may be more efficacious than placebo (moderate-certainty to low-certainty evidence). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs including aspirin, piroxicam, diclofenac, ketorolac, and the antidepressant medicine imipramine, may be at least as efficacious as opioids for moderate-to-severe background cancer pain. For breakthrough cancer pain, oral transmucosal, buccal, sublingual, or intranasal fentanyl preparations were identified as more efficacious than placebo but were more commonly associated with toxicities, including constipation and nausea. Despite being recommended worldwide for the treatment of cancer pain, morphine was generally not superior to other opioids, nor did it have a more favorable toxicity profile. The interpretation of study results, however, was complicated by the heterogeneity in the study populations evaluated. Given the limited quality and quantity of research, there is a need to reappraise the clinical utility of opioids in people with cancer pain, particularly those who are not at the end of life, and to further explore the effects of opioids on immune system function and quality of life in these individuals.

Impact of Opioid Use on Duration of Therapy and Overall Survival for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have significantly improved outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the effect of opioid use on outcomes in patients receiving ICI either alone or with chemotherapy. We conducted a retrospective review of 209 patients with advanced NSCLC who received an ICI at the University of Virginia between 1 February 2015 and 1 January 2020. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to evaluate the impact of opioid use on duration of therapy (DOT) and overall survival (OS). Patients with no or low opioid use (n = 172) had a median DOT of 12.2 months (95% CI: 6.9-17.4) compared to 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.8-2.0) for those with high opioid use (n = 37, HR 0.26 95% CI: 0.17-0.40, p < 0.001). Patients with no or low opioid use had a median OS of 22.6 months (95% CI: 14.8-30.4) compared to 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.7-4.9) for those with high opioid use (HR 0.26 95% CI: 0.17-0.40 p < 0.001). High opioid use was associated with a shorter DOT and worse OS. This difference remained significant when accounting for possible confounding variables. These data warrant investigation of possible mechanistic interactions between opioids, tumor progression, and ICIs, as well as prospective evaluation of opioid-sparing pain management strategies, where possible.

Cannabinoids and the endocannabinoid system in immunotherapy: helpful or harmful?

Numerous studies in various cancer models have demonstrated that ingredients of cannabis can influence tumor growth through the endocannabinoid system (ECS), a network of molecules (mediators, receptors, transporters, enzymes) that maintains homeostasis and protection in many tissues. The main constituents of the ECS are the classical cannabinoid (CB) receptors, such as CB1 and CB2, their endogenous ligands (endocannabinoids), and the endocannabinoids' synthesizing and degrading enzymes. The role of the ECS in cancer is still unclear and its effects often depend on the tumor entity and the expression levels of CB receptors. Many studies have highlighted the tumor cell-killing potential of CB1 agonists. However, cannabis is also known as an immunosuppressant and some data suggest that the use of cannabis during immunotherapy worsens treatment outcomes in cancer patients. CB receptors are widely present in immune cells, and together with monoacylglycerol lipase, the 2-arachidonoylglycerol degrading enzyme, they could be critically involved in the regulation of the immune cell profile of the tumor microenvironment (TME), and hence in tumor progression. So far, data on the impact of the ECS in the immune-TME are still vague. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of the ECS on immunoregulation during tumor growth, and how it might affect the outcome of cancer immunotherapy.

Effects of Acetaminophen Exposure on Outcomes of Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

(1) Background: Several studies have investigated potential interactions between immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and commonly prescribed medications. Although acetaminophen (APAP) has not been considered susceptible to interaction with ICIs, recent research has shown that detectable plasma levels of this drug can hinder the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapies. A reliable assessment of the potential interaction between APAP and ICIs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients would be worthwhile since it is often prescribed in this condition. We sought to evaluate the impact of the concomitant use of APAP in patients with advanced NSCLC on PD-1/PD-L1 blockade using real-world evidence. (2) Methods: This study included consecutive patients with histologically proven stage IV NSCLC who underwent first-line therapy with pembrolizumab as a single agent or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, or second-line therapy with pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or atezolizumab. The intensity of APAP exposure was classified as low (therapeutic intake lasting less than 24 h or a cumulative intake lower than 60 doses of 1000 mg) or high (therapeutic intake lasting more than 24 h or a total intake exceeding 60 doses of 1000 mg). The favorable outcome of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies was defined by durable clinical benefit (DCB). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were relevant to our efficacy analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) methods were applied to adjust for differences between the APAP exposure subgroups. (3) Results: Over the course of April 2018 to October 2022, 80 patients were treated with first-line pembrolizumab either as single-agent therapy or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy. During the period from June 2015 to November 2022, 145 patients were given anti-PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy as second-line treatment. Subsequent efficacy analyses relied on adjusted PSM populations in both treatment settings. Multivariate testing revealed that only the level of APAP and corticosteroid intake had an independent effect on DCB in both treatment lines. Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed high exposure to APAP and immunosuppressive corticosteroid therapy as independent predictors of shorter PFS and OS in both treatment settings. (4) Conclusions: Our findings would strengthen the available evidence that concomitant intake of APAP blunts the efficacy of ICIs in patients with advanced NSCLC. The detrimental effects appear to depend on the cumulative dose and duration of exposure to APAP. The inherent shortcomings of the current research warrant confirmation in larger independent series.

The effect of opioids on the efficacy of immunotherapy in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

OBJECTIVES

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) causes severe pain and opioids, the mainstay of pain management, may have immunomodulatory effects. We evaluated the effect of opioids on immunotherapy efficacy in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HNSCC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective study of 66 R/M HNSCC patients from 2015 to 2020, opioid dosage, calculated as mean morphine milligram equivalent per day, was assessed on the day of anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment and most recent prior visit. Intratumoral T cells were evaluated by single cell RNAseq and immunohistochemistry prior to treatment. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between opioid usage, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate.

RESULTS

Patients were 79% male, 35% oropharynx, 35% oral cavity, 40% locoregional recurrence, and 56% platinum failure. Higher opioid dosage by continuous variable was significantly associated with lower PFS (p = 0.016) and OS (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, including platinum failure status and PD-L1, higher opioids were associated with lower OS. Opioid usage by categorical variable was associated with significantly lower intratumoral CD8+ T cells. Opioid receptor, OPRM1, expression was identified in intratumoral and circulating T cells.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study cohort of anti-PD-1 mAb treatment in R/M HNSCC patients, higher opioids were associated with significantly lower PFS and OS and lower CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment. To our knowledge, this is the first analysis in R/M HNSCC patients and further research into the clinical and biologic effect of opioids is warranted.