Age and Sex Specific Trends in Incidence of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis in Danish Birth Cohorts from 1992 to 2002: A Nationwide Register Linkage Study

The impact of an online, lifestyle intervention programme on the lives of patients with a rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease: a pilot study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the short- and long-term effects of an online, interactive, multifactorial lifestyle intervention programme (Leef! Met Reuma) on health risk and all ICHOM-recommended patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with an inflammatory arthritis (IA), osteoarthritis (OA) or fibromyalgia (FM).

METHODS

Patients with an IA, OA or FM could register for the lifestyle intervention programme. The programme consists of a 3-month intensive part followed by a 21-month aftercare period and focuses on four pillars, namely nutrition, exercise, relaxation and sleep. Health risk and PROMs are collected 3-monthly during the first 6 months and 6-monthly during the next 18 months. Health risk includes self-reported weight, waist circumference and BMI. Following PROMs were included: pain, morning stiffness severity, fatigue, Health Assessment Questionnaire, quality of life, perceived stress, sleep disturbance and impact on life. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the change in health risk and PROMs during the intensive part of the programme and aftercare period.

RESULTS

Of the 264 patients studied, 88, 105 and 71 were diagnosed with IA, OA and FM, respectively. Health risk significantly improved in all three diagnosis groups during the intensive part of the programme. The mean BMI reduction was -1.36 (0.26), -1.22 (0.23) and -1.48 (0.33), whereafter it stabilized in the aftercare period. All PROMs showed a similar trend.

CONCLUSION

An online, interactive lifestyle intervention programme has a positive long-term effect, even after 2 years of follow-up, on health risk and all PRO domains in patients with an IA, OA and FM.

Incidence of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Finland, 2000-2020

OBJECTIVE

Previous epidemiological data of JIA in Finland are from the turn of the millennium. We aimed to determine the recent annual incidence of JIA in several consecutive years in Finland and to explore the differences in incidence between sexes, age groups and regions.

METHODS

We analysed all children <16 years of age who met the ILAR classification criteria for JIA. Cases from 2000-2020 were identified from two national registers: the Care Register for Health Care of the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare and the Reimbursement Register containing medication data from the Social Insurance Institution of Finland; cases from 2016-2020 were identified from the Finnish Rheumatology Quality Register.

RESULTS

The incidence of JIA was 31.7 per 100 000 (95% CI 30.2, 33.1), according to the Care Register in 2000-2020 and peaked in 2010-2014. No considerable differences in incidence rates were observed among registers. In all age groups, incidence in girls was predominant compared with boys. The incidence in girls peaked at the ages of 2 years and 14-15 years. Decreasing incidence was observed among boys 0-3 years old during the entire study period, whereas increasing incidence was observed among teenage girls and boys 4-7 years old in 2000-2013.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of JIA is not only very high with respect to that in other parts of the world but also higher than previously reported in Finland. The incidence varied by region and year but was not higher at the end than the beginning of the study period.

38.3 Primary Immunodeficiencies: When is it not just "JIA"

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is sometimes considered a diagnosis of exclusion as the name signifies that no cause is evident for this form of arthritis. Despite this JIA has some classical clinical features and many categories are defined based on the phenotype. Since there is no diagnostic test for JIA, diseases that can mimic JIA, including Primary Immunodeficiencies (PID) can sometimes be misdiagnosed as JIA. The clues to suspecting PIDs are early age of onset, presence of family history, increased susceptibility to infections, unusual features like urticaria, interstitial lung disease, sensorineural hearing loss and poor response to conventional therapy, amongst others. This review will highlight the basics of PIDs and will discuss PIDs that can present with arthritis and hence can be confused with JIA.

Association of IL-17A and IL-10 Polymorphisms with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis in Finnish Children

To analyze the role of interleukin IL-17A and IL-10 polymorphisms in susceptibility to juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), 98 Finnish children and adolescents with JIA were studied. Data from the 1000 Genomes Project, consisting of 99 healthy Finns, served as the controls. The patients were analyzed for four IL-17A and three IL-10 gene-promoter polymorphisms, and the serum IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-10, and IL-6 levels were determined. The IL-17A rs8193036 variant genotypes (CT/CC) were more common among the patients than controls, especially in those with polyarthritis (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.11-3.36; p = 0.020). IL-17A rs2275913 minor allele A was more common in patients (OR 1.45, 95% Cl 1.08-1.94; p = 0.014) and especially among patients with oligoarthritis and polyarthritis than the controls (OR 1.61, 95%CI 1.06-2.43; p = 0.024). Carriers of the IL-17A rs4711998 variant genotype (AG/AA) had higher serum IL-17A levels than those with genotype GG. However, carriers of the variant genotypes of IL-17A rs9395767 and rs4711998 appeared to have higher IL-17F levels than those carrying wildtype. IL-10 rs1800896 variant genotypes (TC/CC) were more abundant in patients than in the controls (OR 1.97, 95%CI 1.06-3.70; p = 0.042). Carriers of the IL-10 rs1800896 variant genotypes had lower serum levels of IL-17F than those with wildtype. These data provide preliminary evidence of the roles of IL-17 and IL-10 in the pathogenesis of JIA and its subtypes in the Finnish population. However, the results should be interpreted with caution, as the number of subjects included in this study was limited.

An Explainable and Conformal AI Model to Detect Temporomandibular Joint Involvement in Children Suffering from Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease during childhood and adolescence. The temporomandibular joints (TMJ) are among the most frequently affected joints in patients with JIA, and mandibular growth is especially vulnerable to arthritic changes of the TMJ in children. A clinical examination is the most cost-effective method to diagnose TMJ involvement, but clinicians find it difficult to interpret and inaccurate when used only on clinical examinations. This study implemented an explainable artificial intelligence (AI) model that can help clinicians assess TMJ involvement. The classification model was trained using Random Forest on 6154 clinical examinations of 1035 pediatric patients (67% female, 33% male) and evaluated on its ability to correctly classify TMJ involvement or not on a separate test set. Most notably, the results show that the model can classify patients within two years of their first examination as having TMJ involvement with a precision of 0.86 and a sensitivity of 0.7. The results show promise for an AI model in the assessment of TMJ involvement in children and as a decision support tool.

Systematic review to estimate the prevalence of inflammatory rheumatic diseases in Germany

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to update the prevalence estimates of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) in Germany.

METHODS

A systematic literature search in PubMed and Web of Science (last search 08 November 2022) identified original articles (regional and nationwide surveys and claims data analyses for arthritides, connective tissue diseases, and vasculitides) on prevalences for the period 2014-2022. Data sources, collection period, case definition, and risk of bias are reported. Prevalences were estimated from available national data, with consideration of international data.

RESULTS

Screening by two authors yielded 263 hits, of which 18 claims data analyses and 2 surveys met the inclusion criteria. Prevalences ranged from 0.42 to 1.85% (rheumatoid arthritis), 0.32-0.5% (ankylosing spondylitis), 0.11-0.32% (psoriatic arthritis), 0.037-0.14% (systemic lupus erythematosus), 0.07-0.77% (Sjögren's disease/sicca syndrome), 0.14-0.15% (polymyalgia rheumatica, ≥ 40 years), 0.04-0.05% (giant cell arteritis, ≥ 50 years), and 0.015-0.026% (ANCA-associated vasculitis). The risk of bias was moderate in 13 and high in 7 studies. Based on the results, we estimate the prevalence of IRD in Germany to be 2.2-3.0%, which corresponds to approximately 1.5-2.1 million affected individuals. The prevalence of juvenile idiopathic arthritis was reported to be around 0.10% (0.07-0.10%) of 0-18-year-olds, corresponding to about 14,000 children and adolescents in Germany.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review shows an increase in the prevalence of IRD in Germany, which is almost exclusively based on claims data analyses. In the absence of multistage population studies, the available data are, overall, uncertain sources for prevalence estimates, with a moderate to high risk of bias.

[Systematic review to estimate the prevalence of inflammatory rheumatic diseases in Germany. German version]

OBJECTIVE

To update the estimated prevalence of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) in Germany.

METHODS

A systematic literature search in PubMed and Web of Science (last search 8 November 2022) identified original articles (regional and nationwide surveys and routine data analyses for arthritides, connective tissue diseases, and vasculitides) on the prevalence for the period 2014-2022. Data sources, collection period, case definition, and risk of bias are reported. The prevalences were estimated from available national data, with consideration of international data.

RESULTS

Screening by 2 authors yielded 263 hits, of which 18 routine data analyses and 2 surveys met the inclusion criteria. Prevalence data ranged from 0.42% to 1.85% (rheumatoid arthritis), 0.32-0.5% (ankylosing spondylitis), 0.11-0.32% (psoriatic arthritis), 0.037-0.14% (systemic lupus erythematosus), 0.07-0.77% (Sjoegren's disease/sicca syndrome), 0.14-0.15% (polymyalgia rheumatica, ≥ 40 years), 0.04-0.05% (giant cell arteritis, ≥ 50 years), and 0.015-0.026% (ANCA-associated vasculitis). The risk of bias was moderate in 13 and high in 7 studies. Based on the results, we estimate the prevalence of IRD in Germany to be 2.2-3.0%, which corresponds to approximately 1.5-2.1 million affected individuals. Prevalence data of juvenile idiopathic arthritis was reported to be around 0.10% (0.07-0.10%) of patients 0-18 years old, corresponding to about 14,000 children and adolescents in Germany.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review shows an increase in the prevalence of IRD in Germany, which is almost exclusively based on routine data analyses. In the absence of multistage population studies, the available data are overall uncertain sources for prevalence estimates at moderate to high risk of bias.

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: frequency and long-term outcome in Western Australia

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (S-JIA) is a rare but potentially life threatening autoinflammatory condition of childhood. Given the limited data on S-JIA from the Australasian region, we investigated the epidemiological characteristics and long-term disease outcome in S-JIA. All hospitalised patients under the age of 16 years registered with ICD-10-AM code M08.2 in in the period 1999-2014 were identified in longitudinally linked administrative health data across all Western Australian (WA) hospitals. Incidence and point prevalence estimate were per 100,000 population with Poisson regression to analyse the incidence trend. Readmissions with S-JIA as primary diagnosis were considered flares with rates for flare and other complication reported per 100 person years with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Annual S-JIA incidence was 0.61/100,000 (CI 0.28-1.25) (46 incident cases, 71.7% girls, median age 6.5 years) and stable over time as S-JIA point prevalence reached 7.15/100,000 (CI 5.29-7.45) at the end of study. Most incident cases were diagnosed in winter and spring, but documented preceding infections were rare. During a median follow-up of 8 years, disease flares occurred in 24% of patients with higher flares rate in boys (58.3; CI 44.5-74.9) than girls (14.7; CI 9.9-20.9). No deaths occurred and arthroplasty was the main, but uncommon S-JIA complication (4%). However, readmission (86.3; CI 76.4-97.2) and ED visit (73.3; CI 64.2-83.4) rates for illnesses other than S-JIA were substantial. S-JIA is as rare in WA as in other regions and while s-JIA incurred no deaths in the era of biologics, it associated with a significant long-term burden of (co-) morbidity.

The role of liver transaminase levels in methotrexate intolerance in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-a cross-sectional study

Methotrexate (MTX) plays a key role when treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), but MTX-intolerance is challenging. MTX-treatment might affect the liver, causing elevated levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), yet the role of ALT-levels in MTX-intolerance in JIA remains unclear. Our study aimed to investigate the association between ALT-levels during MTX-treatment and MTX-intolerance in JIA. Children (> 9 years old) diagnosed with JIA and treated with MTX (> 6 weeks) were eligible for enrollment. MTX-intolerance was assessed using the Methotrexate Intolerance Severity Score (MISS), completed by the parents, and defined as MISS ≥ 6 with at least 1 point for a behavioral/anticipatory/associative symptom. ALT-levels were determined at enrollment. A total of 118 children were enrolled (80 girls; 38 boys). MTX-intolerance was registered in 61%. ALT-levels did not differ between the MTX-intolerant group (median = 17.0 U/L [IQR: 14.0-26.0]) and the MTX-tolerant group (median = 20.5 U/L [IQR: 16.0-27.5]; p = 0.17). MTX-intolerance was prevalent in around 60% of both boys and girls. Nine out of 50 MTX-intolerant girls had elevated ALT-levels compared to 0/22 MTX-intolerant boys, however, there was no difference in median ALT levels between the two groups. Furthermore, the MTX-intolerant girls had a higher MISS (median = 14.0 [IQR: 9.3-17]) than the MTX-intolerant boys (median = 10.0 [IQR: 7.3-12]; p = 0.009). Our study did not find a difference in ALT-levels between MTX-intolerant and MTX-tolerant children. However, only MTX-intolerant girls and no MTX-intolerant boys showed elevated ALT-levels.

Disparities in Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases

Health and health care disparities in pediatric rheumatology are prevalent among socially disadvantaged and marginalized populations based on race/ethnicity, socioeconomic position, and geographic region. These groups are more likely to experience greater disease severity, morbidity, mortality, decreased quality of life, and poor mental health outcomes, which are in part due to persistent structural and institutional barriers, including decreased access to quality health care. Most of the research on health and health care disparities in pediatric rheumatology focuses on juvenile idiopathic arthritis and childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus; there are significant gaps in the literature assessing disparities associated with other pediatric rheumatic diseases. Understanding the underlying causes of health care disparities will ultimately inform the development and implementation of innovative policies and interventions on a federal, local, and individual level.