Nutritional Status Indicators as Predictors of Postoperative Complications in the Elderly with Gastrointestinal Cancer

Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria: Clinical benefits for patients with gastric cancer

Malnutrition is a prevalent condition among patients with gastric cancer and is associated with poor survival outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in predicting survival among patients with gastric cancer. The multicenter retrospective cohort study (INSCOC study) included 1406 patients enrolled between December 2012 and April 2020, with follow-up data collected until June 2023. Various indices for muscle evaluation, such as calf circumference (CC) and body weight-standardized hand grip strength (HGS/W), were used to diagnose malnutrition. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyze the relationship between nutrition status, as defined by GLIM criteria, and survival outcomes in these patients. The analysis revealed that using CC or HGS/W as positive indicators of malnutrition effectively identified patients with survival-related malnutrition. The incidence of malnutrition was 54.5%, with patients' median overall survival times of 1169 days for stage I and 575 days for stage II cancer (P < 0.001). Malnutrition was identified as an independent risk factor for survival. Additionally, a nomogram developed through Cox regression analysis demonstrated precise predictive capability, incorporating factors such as tumor node metastasis staging, Karnofsky Performance Status Scale, direct bilirubin levels, and nutrition intervention. The study concludes that the GLIM criteria are effective in diagnosing malnutrition and predicting survival in patients with gastric cancer. Nutrition interventions significantly enhance survival outcomes, underscoring the importance of standardized nutrition treatments in improving patient prognosis.

Malnutrition Diagnosed by Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment and the Risk of All-Cause Mortality in Adults With Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Several reviews have highlighted that the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is the best diagnostic tool for assessing nutritional status in cancer patients. However, previous meta-analyses summarizing the prevalence of malnutrition and overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer are quite limited. This study aims to determine the overall prevalence and association between malnutrition, as defined by the PG-SGA, and mortality in adults with GI cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review of articles published from 2005 to 2023 was conducted using Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Sciences and Scopus. The PRISMA guideline was followed to organize the entire content. A random-effects meta-analysis model using R Studio was performed to quantify the pooled proportion and hazard ratios (HRs). Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test and funnel plots. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 and Baujat plots. This study was registered in PROSPERO under the protocol number CRD42023465685.

RESULTS

In this study, 46 publications with 23,235 participants were included in the final meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of malnutrition among adults with GI cancer, as determined by the PG-SGA, was 61% (95% CI: 51%-70%, I2 = 99%). The pooled prevalence of moderate and severe malnutrition were 38% (95% CI: 31%-45%, I2 = 96%) and 21% (95% CI: 13%-31%, I2 = 98%), respectively. By cancer type, malnutrition was more common in patients with oesophageal cancer (78%, 95% CI: 45%-94%, I2 = 99%) and gastric cancer (75%, 95% CI: 68%-81%, I2 = 87%). Additionally, the overall risk (pooled HR) of malnutrition on mortality among GI cancer patients was 2.02 (95% CI: 1.63%-2.5%, I2 = 23%).

CONCLUSION

Malnutrition is common in adults with GI cancer and doubles the risk of all-cause mortality. These results emphasize the importance of ongoing efforts in prevention, early assessment, and intervention for malnutrition to minimize mortality rates.

Prognostic significance of preoperative nutritional status for postoperative acute kidney injury in older patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The association between malnutrition and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) has not been well studied. In this study, the authors examined the association between preoperative nutritional status and postoperative AKI in older patients who underwent major abdominal surgery, as well as the predictive value of malnutrition for AKI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors retrospectively included patients aged 65 or older who underwent major elective abdominal surgery. The nutritional status of the patient was evaluated using three objective nutritional indices, such as the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and the controlling nutritional status (CONUT). AKI was determined using the KDIGO criteria. The authors performed logistic regression analysis to investigate the association between preoperative nutritional status and postoperative AKI, as well as the predictive value of nutritional scores for postoperative AKI.

RESULTS

A total of 2775 patients were included in the study, of which 707 (25.5%), 291 (10.5%), and 517 (18.6%) had moderate to severe malnutrition according to GNRI, PNI, and CONUT calculations. After surgery, 144 (5.2%) patients developed AKI, 86.1% at stage 1, 11.1% at stage 2, and 2.8% at stage 3 as determined by KDIGO criteria. After adjustment for traditional risk factors, worse nutritional scores were associated with a higher AKI risk. In addition to traditional risk factors, these nutritional indices improved the predictive ability of AKI prediction models, as demonstrated by significant improvements in integrated discrimination and net reclassification.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor preoperative nutritional status, as assessed by GNRI, PNI, and CONUT scores, was associated with an increased risk of postoperative AKI. Incorporating these scores into AKI prediction models improved their performance. These findings emphasize the need for screening surgical patients for malnutrition risk. Further research is needed to determine whether preoperative malnutrition assessment and intervention can reduce postoperative AKI incidence.

Nutritional Assessment Tools for Patients with Cancer: A Narrative Review

Cancer patients are at high risk of malnutrition, which can lead to adverse health outcomes such as prolonged hospitalization, increased complications, and increased mortality. Accurate and timely nutritional assessment plays a critical role in effectively managing malnutrition in these patients. However, while many tools exist to assess malnutrition, there is no universally accepted standard. Although different tools have their own strengths and limitations, there is a lack of narrative reviews on nutritional assessment tools for cancer patients. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a non-systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from their inception until May 2023. A total of 90 studies met our selection criteria and were included in our narrative review. We evaluated the applications, strengths, and limitations of 4 commonly used nutritional assessment tools for cancer patients: the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), and Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM). Our findings revealed that malnutrition was associated with adverse health outcomes. Each of these 4 tools has its applications, strengths, and limitations. Our findings provide medical staff with a foundation for choosing the optimal tool to rapidly and accurately assess malnutrition in cancer patients. It is essential for medical staff to be familiar with these common tools to ensure effective nutritional management of cancer patients.

The relationship between GLIM-malnutrition, post-operative complications and long-term prognosis in elderly patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery

Background

Elderly people and patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) are both at high risk of malnutrition. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore suitable malnutrition screening and diagnostic indicators for elderly patients with CRC. Recently, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) proposed new diagnostic criteria for malnutrition. The aim of this article was to evaluate the diagnostic value of GLIM criteria for malnutrition in elderly colorectal patients. We explored the relationship between GLIM-malnutrition, post-operative complications and the long-term prognosis of elderly colorectal patients.

Methods

Elderly patients (aged ≥65 years) who underwent CRC surgery from January 2015 to December 2018 were included. Malnutrition was diagnosed based on the GLIM criteria. The relationships between GLIM-malnutrition and clinical characteristics were analyzed by t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and chi-squared tests. The relationships between GLIM-malnutrition and post-operative complications were analyzed by chi-squared tests, and logistic regression analyses. The relationships between GLIM-malnutrition and the long-term prognosis were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analyses and logistic and Cox regression analyses.

Results

A total of 385 elderly patients were included in this study, and 118 patients (30.65%) were diagnosed with malnutrition according to the GLIM criteria. GLIM-malnutrition was significantly associated with older age, lower body mass index (BMI), lower grip strength, tumor location, higher Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002), and lower levels of albumin and hemoglobin. GLIM-malnutrition was an independent risk factor [odds ratio (OR): 1.753, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.100-2.795, P=0.018] for post-operative complications. Cox regression analysis showed that GLIM-malnutrition was an independent risk factor for overall survival in elderly patients with CRC.

Conclusions

The GLIM criteria are feasible diagnostic criteria for malnutrition of elderly patients with CRC. GLIM-malnutrition is significantly associated with post-operative complications and overall survival in elderly patients with CRC.