A Systematic Review on Professional Regulation and Credentialing of Public Health Workforce

Exploring Influential Factors Shaping Nursing as a Profession and Science in Healthcare System-A Systematic Literature Review

Introduction: Nursing faces numerous challenges amidst broader socio-political transitions in many countries. Despite efforts to establish formal nursing education and legislative frameworks, the profession's status remains relatively low within some healthcare systems. This study aims to examine the factors influencing nursing professionalism and provide insights into strategies for its enhancement. Aim: The study seeks to summarize the existing literature on nursing professionalism, assess methodological quality, and derive recommendations for future research. Through a systematic review, the study explores various factors shaping nursing professionalism, including communication skills, resilience, education, and cultural perceptions. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across multiple electronic databases from 2014 to 2024 to identify relevant studies on nursing professionalism. The search strategy encompassed elements of professionalism, nursing, and exclusion criteria. Selected studies underwent methodological quality assessment using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Checklist. Results: The review identified 421 records, yielding 72 eligible studies after screening and eliminating duplicates. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, revealing a complex framework of factors influencing nursing professionalism. The key determinants include communication skills, resilience, education, and cultural perceptions. Studies emphasized the importance of effective communication, resilience in crisis management, quality education, and understanding psychological and cultural influences on professionalism. Conclusions: Nursing professionalism is influenced by multifaceted factors, including communication skills, resilience, education, and cultural perceptions. Recognizing these factors is vital for promoting high-quality nursing practice and ensuring patient safety. Addressing these elements can inform targeted interventions to enhance nursing professionalism and support nurses in delivering optimal healthcare. This study underscores the importance of investing in nursing education, fostering resilience, and considering cultural nuances to cultivate a culture of excellence and professionalism within healthcare systems.

Professional development: a mixed methods study of Masters of Public Health alumni

Introduction

We examined the perceptions of the Master of Public Health (MPH) degree graduates regarding their personal competencies, job performance and professional development using a mixed method, explanatory sequential design.

Methods

A cross-sectional, self-administered questionnaire of the Haifa School of Public Health alumni who graduated between 2005 and 2022 was disseminated to 849 graduates between March and June 2022, from which 127 responded (response rate: 14.90%). This was followed by 24 in-depth interviews with alumni from the same sample (conducted between November 2022 and March 2023).

Results

The sample included 74.8% of females with a mean age of 40.7 years, 35% of alumni agreed that the MPH degree helped them attain a promotion in their present position (in rank or salary), and 63.8% felt that the degree helped them improve their job performance and contribute to their current workplace. Most (80.3%) alumni reported not changing jobs after graduation. The interview themes revealed that the MPH contributed to their personal and professional lives, provided them with a holistic view of public health and health systems, and improved their in-depth scientific skills. The main reported barriers to professional development included missing core competencies, low salaries, and a lack of information regarding suitable jobs. Surprisingly, an MPH was not a requirement for some public health sector jobs. Alumni reported that the MPH degree contributed to improving many graduates' careers and satisfaction levels and to build their leadership competencies in public health.

Discussion

There seems to be a lack of coordination between the academic curriculum and the jobs available for alumni, hindering better alumni professional development. Regular discussions, information sharing, and curriculum refinements between MPH program leaders and health sector leaders might help address many of the concerns of MPH degree graduates.

Implementing evidence ecosystems in the public health service: Development of a framework for designing tailored training programs

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of local evidence ecosystems in which academia and practice in the Public Health Service (PHS) are interconnected. However, appropriate organizational structures and well-trained staff are lacking and evidence use in local public health decision-making has to be integrated into training programs in Germany. To address this issue, we developed a framework incorporating a toolbox to conceptualize training programs designed to qualify public health professionals for working at the interface between academia and practice. We conducted a scoping review of training programs, key-informant interviews with public health experts, and a multi-professional stakeholder workshop and triangulated their output. The resulting toolbox consists of four core elements, encompassing 15 parameters: (1) content-related aspects, (2) context-related aspects, (3) aspects relevant for determining the training format, and (4) aspects relevant for consolidation and further development. Guiding questions with examples supports the application of the toolbox. Additionally, we introduced a how-to-use guidance to streamline the creation of new training programs, fostering knowledge transfer at the academia-practice interface, equipping public health researchers and practitioners with relevant skills for needs-based PHS research. By promoting collaborative training development across institutions, our approach encourages cross-institutional cooperation, enhances evidence utilization, and enables efficient resource allocation. This collaborative effort in developing training programs within local evidence ecosystems not only strengthens the scientific and practical impact but also lays a foundation for implementing complex public health measures effectively at the local level.

Barriers to effective clinical supervision from the perspective of nurses: A descriptive qualitative study

AIM

The present study aimed to explain the barriers to effective clinical supervision from the perspective of nurses.

DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive study.

METHODS

The present study enrolled 21 nurses selected by purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, which were digitally recorded and immediately transcribed verbatim, and analysed using content analysis method.

RESULTS

From the nurses' perspective, the influential barriers included poor academic, ethical, communicational, professional competencies at the passive management level, defects in supervision prerequisites, conventional beliefs, ineffective organization, shortage of workforce at the level of inappropriate context, lack of motivation and poor accountability at inadequate professional maturity level.

PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The following items affect how clinical supervision is implemented: Motivation, accountability at the personal level, sufficient workforce, conducive conditions, effective organization of resources, and preparing the individual for supervision at the organizational level to implement effective clinical supervision.