Real-World Experience with Brolucizumab in Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The REBA Study

Long-term efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A multicentre retrospective real-world study

PURPOSE

To investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal brolucizumab (BRZ) injections in patients with typical neovascular age-related macular degeneration (typical nAMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).

METHODS

This multicentre retrospective study included 401 eyes of 398 patients with nAMD who received BRZ injection(s), with a follow-up duration of ≥12 months. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal fluid evaluation and central subfield thickness (CST) on optical coherence tomography were assessed. The efficacy of BRZ was compared between typical nAMD and PCV groups.

RESULTS

Analyses were conducted with 280 eyes of 278 patients with typical nAMD and 121 eyes of 120 patients with PCV (mean age, 71.1 ± 8.6 years). 29 eyes (7.2%) were treatment naïve. The mean follow-up period was 15.3 ± 2.8 months; the mean number of BRZ injections within 1 year was 4.5 ± 1.7. BCVA was maintained during the follow-up period, and CST significantly improved from the first injection month and was maintained for 12 months in both the typical nAMD and PCV groups. The dry macula proportion increased from 2.7% at baseline to 56.1% at 1 month and 42.9% at 12 months. Among the 18 eyes that underwent indocyanine green angiography both before and after treatment, 10 (55.6%) showed polyp regression. Overall, the incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), retinal vasculitis and occlusive retinal vasculitis was 9.4% (38 eyes), 1.2% (5 eyes) and 0.5% (2 eyes), respectively. IOI occurred from the first to the sixth injections, with an average IOI onset of 28.5 ± 1.4 days. All eyes achieved IOI resolution, although the two eyes with occlusive retinal vasculitis showed a severe visual decline after IOI resolution.

CONCLUSION

Brolucizumab was effective in maintaining BCVA and managing fluid in eyes with nAMD for up to 1 year, exhibiting a high polyp regression rate. However, the not uncommon incidence of IOI and the severe visual decline caused by the rare occlusive retinal vasculitis following BRZ treatment underscore the importance of careful monitoring and timely management.

Evaluating photodynamic therapy versus brolucizumab as a second-line treatment for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

BACKGROUND

To compare the one-year outcomes between intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) monotherapy and photodynamic therapy (PDT) as a second-line treatment in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) who did not respond to first-line therapy.

METHODS

This case-control study included eyes with PCV that do not respond to aflibercept or ranibizumab. The patients were retrospectively registered. We compared outcomes, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), anatomical results, and the need for additional treatments, between IVBr and a combination therapy using PDT as second-line treatments for refractory PCV, after adjusting for potential confounders. We analyzed E-values to evaluate the robustness of the results against unmeasured confounders.

RESULTS

Twenty-two eyes received IVBr, and twenty-four underwent PDT. No apparent differences were observed in BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT) changes from baseline between the groups (IVBr vs. PDT: BCVA, 0.01 ± 0.47 logMAR vs. 0.04 ± 0.18 logMAR, P-value = 0.756; CMT: - 36.3 ± 99.4 μm vs. - 114.7 ± 181.4 μm, P-value = 0.146). Only in the PDT group, five eyes (20.8%) did not require additional treatment after the second-line treatment, the adjusted odds ratio indicating no further treatment needed was 11.98 (95% confidence interval: 1.42-2070.07, P-value = 0.019). The E-value for the adjusted odds ratio was 23.44.

CONCLUSIONS

Both second-line treatments for PCV exhibited similar visual and anatomical outcomes. Only in the PDT-treated eyes were there some patients who did not require further treatment after second-line therapy.

Brolucizumab in recalcitrant neovascular age-related macular degeneration-real-world data in Chinese population

This retrospective study aimed to determine the short-term efficacy and safety of brolucizumab treatment for recalcitrant neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in a real-world setting in Taiwan. Recalcitrant nAMD patients who were treated with brolucizumab from November 2021 to August 2022 at Taipei Veterans General Hospital were included. Patients were followed for 3 months after switching to brolucizumab. The primary outcomes were changes in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) from baseline to the third month. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), proportion of patients with subretinal and intraretinal fluid (SRF and IRF), and change in pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height from baseline to the third month. The significance level was considered as p < .05 in all tests. A total of 38 patients (40 eyes) with a mean (±SD) age of 76.3 (±10.84) years were included. The baseline BCVA was 0.92±0.64 logMAR, and the CRT and PED height were 329.0±171.18 and 189.8±114.94 um, respectively. The patients had a significant reduction in CRT and resolution of IRF and SRF from baseline to the third month. There were numerical improvements in mean BCVA and PED height, but they were not significant. The percentages of achieving at least 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 logMAR (equivalent to 5, 10, 15 ETDRS letters) visual gain were 50%, 37.5%, and 30%, respectively, during the first 3 months of follow-up. No IOI occurred in these patients. This study demonstrated that brolucizumab had good short-term structural and functional efficacy in recalcitrant nAMD patients.

Real-world experience with brolucizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration over 2 years: the REBA extension study

BACKGROUND

To determine long-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal brolucizumab therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in the real-world setting.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational, multicentric study and an extension of the REBA study (Real-world Experience with Brolucizumab in nAMD) to 24 months. The study entailed follow-up of 91 consecutive eyes (67 patients) with nAMD who received brolucizumab therapy and completed 24 months of follow-up. Both treatment-naïve and switch therapy patients were included. All relevant data were collected. The primary outcome measure was changed in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over time. Secondary outcome measures included change in central subfield thickness (CST) and complications.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) baseline BCVA was 48.4 (3.5) letters and 36.2 (7.1) letters in treatment-naïve group and switch therapy group, respectively. BCVA gain was + 9.2 (3.7) letters (p = 0.01) and + 7.7 (3.4) letters (p = 0.011), respectively. The change in mean (SD) CST has shown a significant decrease in retinal thickness in treatment-naïve group (from 432.5 (68.4) to 283.0 (51.3) µm; p = 0.018) and in switch therapy group (from 452.5 (40.5) to 271.0 (43.4) µm; p = 0.011) group. One switch patient developed vascular occlusion and another a macular hole after the fifth brolucizumab injection as reported in the primary study. Both patients recovered uneventfully. Three patients demonstrated reversible intraocular inflammation between months 10 and 24.

CONCLUSION

Patients showed a significant anatomical and functional response to brolucizumab therapy in the real world, regardless of prior treatment status, until the end of the follow-up period. Overall, 5 significant untoward events were noted.

Brolucizumab effectiveness in pigment epithelium detachment due to exudative AMD in naïve treatment or non-responder patients

PURPOSE

To investigate outcomes after Brolucizumab injection in naïve treatment or non-responder patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

METHODS

It is a retrospective, comparative, cohort study conducted at the tertiary referral center of the University Hospital Polyclinic of Bari, for 5 years, from November 2017 until May 2022. 41 eyes with wet-AMD (w-AMD) were included, undergoing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal injections. The sample was divided into two groups, the Bro-Switch group, and the Bro-Naïve group. The Bro-Switch group previously received a slot of other anti-VEGF intravitreal drugs. The Bro-Naïve group received Brolucizumab (Bro) as the first treatment. The pigment epithelium detachment (PED) and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) outcomes before and after Bro-injection were evaluated.

RESULTS

A significant reduction in PED measurement was registered in all eyes treated with Bro-injection (p = 0.35). The Bro-Naïve group improved better in PED measurement (mean difference: 297.92 ± 72,32) as compared to the Bro-Switch group (mean difference: 185.06 ± 11.07). On the contrary, no significant reduction in BCVA in the two groups was recorded (p = 0.66).

CONCLUSION

We suggest Bro-injection for w-AMD as effective anatomical outcomes in PED flattening, but not similar in visual results. Although this study evaluated short-term outcomes, the hopeful results can lead to interesting medium-long time effects.

Brolucizumab for recalcitrant macular neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration with pigment epithelial detachment

PURPOSE

To analyze anatomic and functional response to intravitreal brolucizumab in age-related macular degeneration recalcitrant to previous intravitreal anti-VEGF therapies.

METHODS

In this monocentric, one arm, retrospective study, eyes affected by neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) resistant to other intravitreally injected anti-vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors were switched to intravitreal brolucizumab. All patients underwent ophthalmological examinations at baseline and in regular follow-up intervals. Best registered visual acuity (BRVA), Goldmann tonometry, intraocular pressure (IOP), central retinal thickness (CRT) and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) characteristics were analyzed at initiation of anti-VEGF treatment, at treatment switch, and at the end of brolucizumab loading phase.

RESULTS

The study included 20 eyes of 18 consecutively treated patients (age: 77 ± 6 years). All eyes had macular neovascularization with PED. Previous treatments included intravitreal aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab and had not resulted in a significant improvement in BRVA (0.5 ± 0.5 logMAR vs 0.5 ± 0.6 logMAR) or mean CRT (320 ± 60 µm vs 313 ± 83 µm) up to treatment switch to brolucizumab. At the end of the brolucizumab loading phase, there was significant improvement for both BRVA (0.3 ± 0.2 logMAR, P < 0.05) and CRT (264 ± 55 µm, P < 0.05). Under previous anti-VEGF therapy, there was a significant increase/deterioration in both PED area (2.68 mm2 to 5.18 mm2, P < 0.05) and PED volume (0.39 mm3 to 1.07 mm3, P < 0.05); however, both parameters improved after switching to brolucizumab (3.81 mm2 and 0.37 mm3, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest a favourable anatomical and visual response after treatment switch to brolucizumab in patients with nAMD refractory to previous anti-VEGF agents.

Functional and anatomical outcomes of brolucizumab for nAMD in a real-life setting

To report long-term outcomes of brolucizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treatment. Records from 74 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Both naïve eyes and those previously treated with other antiVEGF agents were included. Primary outcomes included variation in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) dimensions. Outcomes were reviewed after the loading phase, at week 24, and at last follow-up. IOI occurrence represented the secondary outcome. BCVA improved significantly in both groups. In switched eyes, IRF and SRF were significantly reduced at every timepoint, with CST reduction from week 24 (p = 0.005). In naïve group, CST decreased from the loading phase (p = 0.006) and all patients showed dry macula from week 24. A significant reduction in PED maximum high was demonstrated in both groups. In seven naïve eyes, PED completely reabsorbed; a slight increase in PED horizontal maximal diameter was also observed from week 24. IOI occurred in 5.4% of cases. In conclusion, brolucizumab showed a strong drying effect, permitting functional improvement together with fluid reabsorption and an encouraging modification of PED dimension, especially on naïve patients. These results together with the extension of treatment intervals make brolucizumab an efficient therapeutic strategy for nAMD.

Real-world experience of brolucizumab in nAMD

PURPOSE

To evaluate real-world outcomes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in relation to anatomical success, visual outcomes, and safety of intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) injection at 1.5 years.

METHODS

Prospective, randomized, single-center study between December 2020 and December 2022 that included 71 eyes of 62 patients with nAMD, who received IVBr. Patients were divided into three groups, i.e., naïve choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM), switched therapy (st) CNVM, and st polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (stPCV). They were subdivided into dry, minimal fluid (fluid <50 microns)/pigment epithelial detachment (PED) and persistent fluid (fluid >100 microns)/PED subgroups depending upon the fluid level at the end of 1.5 years. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), status of fluid, and number of injections at 1.5 years were evaluated. From the beginning, patients were treated on pro re nata (PRN) basis.

RESULTS

Of the 71 eyes, 27 eyes (38%) were naïve CNVM, 35 eyes (49.3%) were stCNVM, and 9 (12.7%) were stPCV cases. Significant vision improvement after 1.5 years was seen in the stCNVM category (P = 0.001), while CMT reduction was significant in all three groups (P < 0.05). The mean number of injections required in naïve CNVM and stCNVM groups was significantly less as compared to the stPCV group (P = 0.017). Further, vision improvement was significant in the "Minimal fluid" subgroup (P = 0.002), while the CMT improvement was significant in the "Minimal fluid" and "Dry" subgroups each with P < 0.0001. No ocular/systemic adverse events including intraocular inflammation (IOI) were noted.

CONCLUSION

In a real-world scenario, with 203 procedures and 1.5-year follow-up, brolucizumab is found to be efficacious and safe with the need for a lesser number of injections and more interval-free period in the management of naïve CNVM, stCNVM, and stPCV patients.

Brolucizumab in age-related macular neovascularization (BRAIN study): Efficacy, optical coherence tomography biomarkers, and safety profile

BACKGROUND

Brolucizumab is a new anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (IPCV).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective, consecutive, interventional study was conducted from a tertiary eye hospital, in which treatment-naïve and treatment-switch patients were included. They underwent an intravitreal injection of brolucizumab. The decision to reinject was made based on the presence of fluid on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) or worsening of vision at follow-up. Outcome measures were changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), fluid (subretinal/intraretinal/sub-retinal pigment epithelium fluid) levels, and OCT biomarkers and safety analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 59 eyes of 50 patients with a total of 132 intravitreal injections were included. There was a statistically significant improvement (P < 0.05) in BCVA from baseline in logMAR treatment-naïve patients (mean BCVA at baseline 0.6 ± 0.41 and 0.37 ± 0.56). The mean baseline CST of all patients significantly reduced from 582.92 ± 233.11 µm at baseline to 474.06 ± 252.89 µm at the final treatment visit. Thirty-eight percent of patients showed complete resolution of SHRM after a single injection. The interval between each subsequent injection increased from a mean of 67 to 96 days in treatment-switch patients and from 47 to 151 days in treatment-naïve patients.

CONCLUSION

Brolucizumab promises reduced number of injections with longer treatment intervals.

One-Year and 18-Month Outcomes in nAMD Patient Eyes Switched to Brolucizumab Alone versus to Brolucizumab Alternating with Other Anti-VEGF Agents

Objective

Retrospective, real-world study to evaluate visual acuity (VA), anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection intervals, and central macular thickness (CMT) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) eyes switched to brolucizumab only or to brolucizumab alternating with another anti-VEGF.

Methods

The overall study population comprised eyes that were given ≥1 brolucizumab injection between 1 October 2019 and 30 November 2021. The brolucizumab-only (BRO) cohort consisted of prior anti-VEGF-treated eyes treated exclusively with ≥3 brolucizumab injections over ≥12 or ≥18 months; the alternating brolucizumab (ALT) cohort comprised prior anti-VEGF-treated eyes treated with ≥2 brolucizumab injections and ≥1 other anti-VEGF over ≥12 or ≥18 months.

Results

A total of 482 eyes received ≥1 brolucizumab injection during the study period. Mean VA changes from baseline were -1.1±15.1 letters (BRO cohort; n = 174) and 1.3±13.0 letters (ALT cohort; n = 47) at Month 12, and 0.0±13.5 letters (BRO cohort; n = 95) and -7.3±17.2 letters (ALT cohort; n = 29) at Month 18. Mean changes in injection intervals were +26.9±48.1 days (BRO cohort) and +11.1±17.3 days (ALT cohort) at Month 12 and +36.3±52.3 days (BRO cohort) and +14.0±19.9 days (ALT cohort) at Month 18. Mean changes in CMT were -35.2±108.1 μm (BRO cohort) and -31.5±91.2 μm (ALT cohort) at Month 12 and -38.9±75.0 μm (BRO cohort) and -9.0±59.9 μm (ALT cohort) at Month 18. Intraocular inflammation-related adverse events were recorded in 22/482 (4.6%) eyes.

Conclusion

Treatment with either brolucizumab alone or brolucizumab alternating with another anti-VEGF can preserve vision, reduce CMT, and extend anti-VEGF injection intervals in patients with nAMD.

Short-Term Treatment Outcomes of Brolucizumab in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Multicentre Indian Real-World Evidence Study

Objective

To evaluate the short-term effectiveness and safety outcomes following brolucizumab treatment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) as a part of real-world clinical practice in India.

Methods

This was a retrospective, observational, multicentre study including patients (≥50 years old) diagnosed with nAMD. Anonymized data of the patients receiving the first dose of brolucizumab intravitreal injection (IVI) who were either treatment-naïve or previously treated with a single or a combination of other anti-VEGF IVIs were included. The present study reported the change in retinal fluid levels from baseline to month 3, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and the number of injections received. The adverse events in the three months after brolucizumab treatment initiation were also monitored.

Results

The study included 63 patients (65 eyes) from four study centres across India (mean age: 69.1 ± 9.7 years). A total of 82 brolucizumab injections were administered during the 3 months of study duration, with 52/65 (80.0%) eyes receiving only 1 injection. Resolution of IRF, SRF, and PED was observed in 76.9%, 64.6%, and 67.7% of eyes, respectively. Further, a significant reduction in CRT was observed (baseline: 403.5 ± 118.7 μm; month 3: 308.3 ± 73.8 μm; p < 0.001), and BCVA also improved notably from 0.7 ± 0.5 logMAR at baseline to 0.5 ± 0.4 logMAR at month 3 (p < 0.001). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 3 eyes from 3 patients; retinal pigment epithelial rip (1) and subretinal hemorrhage (2) after the first injection of brolucizumab, however, none discontinued the treatment.

Conclusion

The study reports on the short-term effectiveness and tolerability of brolucizumab therapy in the management of nAMD in both treatment-naïve and switch eyes. Brolucizumab was observed to have a favourable benefit-risk profile, and study results were within the known safety profile, with no instances of intraocular inflammation.

Clinical features and associated factors of intraocular inflammation following intravitreal brolucizumab as switching therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to explore the clinical features and associated factors of intraocular inflammation (IOI) following intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) administration for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 87 eyes from 87 Japanese patients with nAMD who were followed up for 5 months after the initial administration of IVBr as switching therapy. Clinical pictures of IOI post-IVBr and changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 5 months were evaluated between eyes with and without IOI (non-IOI). The association between IOI and baseline factors (age, sex, BCVA, hypertension, and/or arteriosclerotic changes in the fundus, subretinal hyperreflective material [SHRM], and macular atrophy) was evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 87 eyes, 18 (20.6%) developed IOI and 2 (2.3%) developed retinal artery occlusion. There were 9 (50%) cases of posterior or pan-uveitis among eyes with IOI. The mean interval from initial IVBr administration to IOI was 2 months. The mean changes in logMAR BCVA at 5 months were significantly worse in IOI eyes than in non-IOI eyes (0.09 ± 0.22 vs. - 0.01 ± 0.15, P = 0.03). There were 8 (44.4%) and 7 (10.1%) cases of macular atrophy and 11 (61.1%) and 13 (18.8%) cases of SHRM in the IOI and non-IOI groups, respectively. SHRM and macular atrophy were significantly associated with IOI (P = 0.0008 and P = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In IVBr therapy for nAMD, eyes with SHRM and/or macular atrophy should be observed more meticulously, given the increased risk of developing IOI, which is associated with insufficient BCVA gain.

Functional Outcomes of Brolucizumab-Induced Intraocular Inflammation Involving the Posterior Segment-A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Early poor outcomes of intraocular inflammation (IOI) after intravitreal brolucizumab (IVB) have negatively affected the use of brolucizumab in clinical routine. We wished to identify factors related to the treatment details of IOI involving the posterior segment resulting from IVB for neovascular AMD (nAMD), if these were reported in detail. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrials, and CENTRAL using the following search terms: <Brolucizumab> AND <AMD> AND <intraocular inflammation>. The risk of bias was rated using the JBI Critical Appraisal Tool. We included 31 reports (41 patients and 46 eyes). Patients were 75.9 ± 8.5 years, and 58.5% were female. IOI occurred 41.7 ± 37.5 (median 37.0) days after treatment initiation with 2.0 ± 1.3 (1-6) IVB injections. A mean change in visual acuity of -14.6 ± 21.0 (median -6.5) letters was reported. The mean time from first IOI signs to the initiation of any anti-inflammatory treatment was 3.3 ± 6.2 days, with 63% of the patients receiving systemic corticosteroids as standard treatment. Finally, a period effect was observed, with a change in visual acuity of -25.3 ± 27.1 and -2.6 ± 7.3 letters in the chronologically first and last third, respectively, of treated eyes (effect size: r = 0.71; p = 0.006). Functional outcomes markedly improved with increasing experience in managing IOI.

Real-world study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal brolucizumab for refractory neovascular age-related macular degeneration

This retrospective study evaluated the real-world safety and effectiveness of switching to intravitreal brolucizumab for refractory neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). A total of 81 patients who received brolucizumab injections as switch therapy were followed for more than 3 months. A good response was defined as better anatomical improvement or extended injection intervals compared with previous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment over a mean follow-up period of 41.4 weeks. Approximately 82.7% of patients showed a good response after switching. After 1 year, patients showed significant visual gains (+ 6.6 letters, p = 0.006) and central retinal thickness reductions (- 112.6 µm, p < 0.001), with 30.8% having injection intervals extended over 12 weeks. In the poor-response group, visual acuity and anatomical outcomes worsened soon after switching. More previous injections, thinner baseline central retina, and the presence of prechoroidal cleft or polypoidal lesion resulted in a better response (p < 0.05). Adverse effects occurred in eight eyes (9.9%), including one retinal vascular occlusion and seven intraocular inflammation cases, which were unrelated to the response. Most patients with nAMD refractory to anti-VEGF treatment demonstrated anatomical improvement or extended injection intervals after switching. This study shows that identified structural biomarkers may predict treatment response and select an appropriate therapeutic strategy.

Brolucizumab Intravitreal Injections for Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Real-Life Study on a Cohort of Italian Patients

Background and Objectives: To report the real-life Brolucizumab therapeutical outcomes of treatment-naïve and non-treatment-naïve eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and to analyze the incidence of therapy-related adverse events. Materials and Methods: A total of 56 eyes of 54 patients diagnosed with nAMD were retrospectively evaluated over a 3-month follow-up. Naïve eyes received a 3-month loading phase, whereas non-naïve eyes were treated with one intravitreal injection + ProReNata scheme. The main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) change. In addition, patients were stratified on the basis of fluid accumulation site, whether intra-retinal (IRF), sub-retinal (SRF), or sub-retinal pigmented epithelium (SRPE), to separately assess the eventual BCVA change in each subgroup. Finally, the incidence of ocular adverse events was evaluated. Results: In naïve eyes, a significant improvement of BCVA (LogMar) was observed at all timepoints from baseline (1 month-Mean Difference (MD): -0.13; 2 months MD: -0.17; 3 months MD: -0.24). In non-naïve eyes, a significant mean change was observed at all timepoints, with the exception of 1-month follow-up (2 months MD: -0.08; 3 months MD: -0.05). CRT significantly changed in both groups at all timepoints at a similar pace within the first two months, with naïve eyes displaying a larger overall thickness decrease at the end of the follow-up (Group 1 = MD: -123.91 µm; Group 2 = MD: -110.33 µm). With respect to the location of the edema, a significant BCVA change was observed in naïve patients with fluid in all three sites at the end of the follow-up (SRPE = MD: -0.13 (p = 0.043); SR = MD: -0.15 (p = 0.019); IR = MD: -0.19 (p = 0.041). Non-naïve patients exhibited significant mean BCVA changes only with respect to SR and IR fluid presence (SRPE = MD: -0.13 (p = 0.152); SR = MD: -0.15 (p = 0.007); IR = MD: -0.06 (p = 0.011). One naïve patient experienced acute-onset anterior and intermediate uveitis which completely resolved after therapy. Conclusions: Brolucizumab was demonstrated to be a safe and efficient alternative in improving both the anatomical and functional parameters of eyes with nAMD in this small, uncontrolled, series of patients.

A Treat-and-Extend Regimen of Intravitreal Brolucizumab for Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration Refractory to Aflibercept: A 12-Month Result

We aimed to investigate whether a treat-and-extend regimen of intravitreal brolucizumab (6.0 mg/0.05 mL) is effective for eyes with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) refractory to aflibercept for 12 months. Sixty eyes from 56 patients receiving brolucizumab for exudative AMD refractory to aflibercept were included. Patients received a mean of 30.1 aflibercept administrations for a mean 67.9-month follow-up. All patients exhibited exudation on optical coherence tomography (OCT) despite regular 4-8 weeks of aflibercept administration. Visit 1 was scheduled at the same interval from the last aflibercept injection to the baseline. The treatment interval was extended or shortened by 1-2 weeks depending on the presence or absence of exudation on OCT. After switching to brolucizumab, the follow-up interval significantly extended at 12 months (before switching: 7.6 ± 3.8 weeks vs. at 12 months: 12.1 ± 6.2 weeks, p = 1.3 × 10^-7). Forty-three percent of the eyes achieved a dry macula at 12 months after switching. However, the best-corrected visual acuity did not improve at any visit. Morphologically, the central retinal thickness and subfoveal choroidal thickness significantly decreased from baseline at 12 months (p = 3.6 × 10^-3 and 1.0 × 10^-3, respectively). Switching to brolucizumab can be considered to extend the treatment interval in eyes with exudative AMD refractory to aflibercept.

Brolucizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema: Ophthalmology and Diabetology Treatment Aspects

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies have become the standard of care in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME), resulting in a remarkable decrease in disease-related vision loss. However, the need for regular injections places a significant burden on patients, caregivers, and the healthcare system and improvements in vision may not be maintained long term. As a result of its drying potency and duration of action, brolucizumab, an intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy approved for the treatment of nAMD and DME, could decrease injection frequency for patients and provide an efficacious treatment; however, balancing its benefits and risks can be challenging. There have been reports of intraocular inflammation (IOI) in patients treated with brolucizumab, which, if left untreated, may result in severe vision loss. Recent evidence, however, indicates that early recognition of IOI and prompt and aggressive systemic corticosteroid treatment in response to posterior segment involvement can lead to favorable outcomes in these relatively rare but severe cases. A series of consensus meetings were conducted in 2022 between Swiss medical retina experts and diabetologists, discussing the current data for brolucizumab and exploring various challenges to its use, including the associated risk of IOI. The outcome is a collation of practical insights and guidance for ophthalmologists on the use of brolucizumab in patients with nAMD and DME, including patient selection and assessment, treatment regimen and monitoring, and the recognition and management of adverse events.

Brolucizumab in Pretreated Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Case Series, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis

Background: Recalcitrant neovascular age-related macular degeneration (rnAMD) despite intensive intravitreal anti-neovascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment, can be handled by switching to another anti-VEGF agent. This first systematic review and meta-analysis presents long-term data after switching from another anti-VEGF agent to brolucizumab. Methods: Retrospective case series over two years of patients switched to brolucizumab, and a systematic review and meta-analysis of peer-reviewed studies presenting patients switched to brolucizumab. Weighted mean differences based on the random-effects models were calculated for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST). Results: The systematic review draws on 1200 eyes switched to brolucizumab. The meta-analysis showed a clinically irrelevant decrease in BCVA after one and two months, together with significant decreases in CST for up to one year after the switch but lacking power over 2 years. Of twelve eyes (twelve patients) in our case series, five continued treatment for two years without experiencing significant changes. Conclusions: After switch to brolucizumab, a significant morphological improvement with CST reduction was shown in eyes with rnAMD. The small worsening of BCVA may be owing to the chronically active nature of rnAMD. Brolucizumab thus remains a treatment option in rnAMD despite its potential side effects.

Review on the Safety and Efficacy of Brolucizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration From Major Studies and Real-World Data

Frequent antivascular endothelial growth factor injections in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) often lead to poor compliance and suboptimal outcomes. A longer-acting agent has been a pressing unmet need until recently. Brolucizumab, an antivascular endothelial growth factor agent, is a single-chain antibody fragment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on October 8, 2019, for treating nAMD. It delivers more molecules at equivalent volumes of aflibercept, thus achieving a longer-lasting effect. We reviewed literature published in English between January 2016 and October 2022 from MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane database, Embase, and Google scholar using the keywords: "Brolucizumab, real-world data, intraocular inflammation (IOI), safety, and efficacy". Brolucizumab showed reduced injection frequency, better anatomic outcomes, and noninferior vision gains compared with aflibercept in HAWK and HARRIER studies. However, post hoc studies on brolucizumab revealed a higher-than-expected incidence of IOI, leading to the early termination of 3 studies: MERLIN, RAPTOR, and RAVEN for nAMD, branch retinal vein occlusion, and central retinal vein occlusion, respectively. Contrastingly real-world data showed encouraging outcomes in terms of fewer IOI cases. The subsequent amendment of the treatment protocol resulted in reduced IOI. Thereafter US FDA approved its use in diabetic macular edema on June 1, 2022. Based on major studies and real-world data, this review shows that brolucizumab is effective for treating naive and refractory nAMD. The risk of IOI is acceptable and manageable, but proper preinjection screening and high-vigilance care of IOI are needed. More studies are warranted to evaluate further the incidence, best prevention, and treatment measures for IOI.

Efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in age-related macular degeneration: A systematic review of real-world studies

Intravitreally injected anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents are first-line treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Phase 3 trials demonstrated non-inferiority of anti-VEGF therapy with brolucizumab compared with aflibercept in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) gains, with superior anatomical outcomes after brolucizumab. The purpose of the review was to summarize real-world efficacy and safety data on brolucizumab in patients with nAMD. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021290530). We conducted systematic searches in Embase, Medline and key ophthalmology congress websites (19 October 2021). Original reports of efficacy and/or safety in patients receiving brolucizumab to treat nAMD in clinical practice were eligible. The descriptive summary includes reports describing at least 10 brolucizumab-treated eyes. In total, 2907 brolucizumab-treated eyes from 26 studies were included. Outcomes were available for treatment-naive eyes (six studies), eyes switched to brolucizumab from other anti-VEGFs (16 studies), and/or treatment-naive and switch eyes combined (eight studies). Follow-up time points ranged from 4 weeks to 1 year post-brolucizumab initiation. For BCVA, significant improvements compared with brolucizumab initiation were reported in four of six studies in treatment-naive eyes (mean BCVA improvement, range: +3.7 to +11.9 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters) and in three of 12 studies in switch eyes (range: +9.0 to +15 ETDRS letters) (all p < 0.05); remaining studies reported no significant post-brolucizumab BCVA changes. For central subfield thickness (CST), improvements post-brolucizumab initiation were reported in all six studies in treatment-naive eyes (mean CST improvement, range: -113.4 to -150.1 μm) and in eight of 11 studies in switch eyes (range: -26 to -185.7 μm) (all p < 0.05). The 14 studies reporting on intraretinal, subretinal and/or total fluid observed improvements post-brolucizumab initiation. The four studies comparing treatment intervals observed extension of the interval between injections after switching to brolucizumab from other anti-VEGFs. Incidence of intraocular inflammation ranged from 0% to 19%. In conclusion, real-world efficacy and safety data concur with brolucizumab pivotal trials. Additionally, reduction of disease activity in anti-VEGF switch eyes was demonstrated by fluid reduction and/or visual acuity gain, along with prolongation of the interval between injections.

The Treatment Patterns with Brolucizumab in Germany (REALIZE) Study: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on Longitudinal Prescription Data

INTRODUCTION

This study describes real-world treatment patterns in Germany for brolucizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

METHODS

This single-arm retrospective cohort study used German patient-level prescription data. Patients aged ≥ 50 years, who received ≥ 1 brolucizumab prescription in one eye only (unilateral) and had a minimum of 12 months follow-up were included. Three cohorts were defined from the overall population: anti-VEGF treatment-naive patients ("treatment-naive"); anti-VEGF treatment-experienced patients ("treatment-experienced"); and of the treatment-experienced cohort, patients persistent on brolucizumab for 12 months ("treatment-experienced persistent"), i.e. who received ≥ 2 brolucizumab injections and did not discontinue or use other anti-VEGF agents in that period. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse patient characteristics and injection intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 2089 patients with at least 12 months follow-up and one brolucizumab injection were analysed. Most were female (58.1%), aged 80+ years (54.7%). A total of 539 (25.8%) were treatment-naive, 1550 (74.2%) treatment-experienced and, of those, 787 (50.8%) were persistent. Overall, the median (interquartile range, IQR) number of brolucizumab injections during the 12 months follow-up was 5.0 (3.0-8.0). In the treatment-naive and treatment-experienced sub-cohorts it was 5.0 (3.0-8.0) and 5.0 (3.0-9.0) injections, respectively. In the treatment-experienced persistent cohort the median (IQR) number of injections was 8.0 (5.0-10.0). In this same cohort, the median (IQR) treatment interval between anti-VEGF injections before switch to brolucizumab was 5.1 (4.0-8.0) weeks, whilst the brolucizumab interval at 12 months after switch was 8.0 (6.0-11.9) weeks. Of treatment-experienced patients, 67% extended their treatment interval and those with pre-switch intervals less than 6 weeks (< q6w), in particular, had meaningful treatment interval extensions.

CONCLUSION

Patients who switched to brolucizumab had a median treatment interval extension of about 3 weeks at 12 months. These results show that treatment with brolucizumab has the potential to reduce treatment burden in patients with nAMD in routine clinical practice.

Switching to brolucizumab: injection intervals and visual, anatomical and safety outcomes at 12 and 18 months in real-world eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

BACKGROUND

The anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection interval influences treatment burden and compliance in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This real-world study investigates visual acuity (VA), injection-interval extension, central macular thickness (CMT) and safety in nAMD eyes switched to the anti-VEGF agent brolucizumab and followed for up to 18 months.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with nAMD who were switched from other anti-VEGF agents to brolucizumab only. Patient eyes were grouped into three nested cohorts with the overall cohort receiving ≥ 1 brolucizumab injection, the second receiving ≥ 3 brolucizumab injections with a follow-up period of ≥ 12 months and the third cohort receiving ≥ 3 brolucizumab injections with a follow-up period of ≥ 18 months. Study endpoints included changes from baseline at 12 or 18 months in VA, injection intervals, and CMT. Sub-group analyses were conducted using baseline injection interval length or baseline VA as qualifiers.

RESULTS

Overall, 482 eyes received ≥ 1 brolucizumab injection; 174 eyes received ≥ 3 brolucizumab injections with ≥ 12 months of follow-up, and 95 eyes received ≥ 3 brolucizumab injections with ≥ 18 months of follow-up. VA (mean [95% confidence intervals]) remained stable relative to baseline after 12 months (- 1.1 [- 3.7, 1.6] letters; p = 0.42) and 18 months (0.0 [- 3.1, 3.1] letters; p = 0.98) of brolucizumab treatment, respectively, and pre-switch injection intervals or baseline VA had no notable effect. Following the switch to brolucizumab, injection intervals were extended from baseline to month 12 by 26.9 (19.7, 34.0) days (p < 0.0001), and eyes with pre-switch injection intervals < 8 weeks were able to have their injection intervals extended by 23.6 days longer than eyes with pre-switch injection intervals ≥ 8 weeks. At 18 months, injection intervals were extended by 36.3 (25.6, 46.9) days (p < 0.0001) compared to baseline. Following switch to brolucizumab, CMT was reduced at both 12 and 18 months (12 months: - 35.2 (- 51.7, - 18.8) µm, p < 0.0001; 18 months: - 38.9 (- 54.3, - 22.0) µm, p < 0.0001). Intraocular inflammation-related adverse events were reported in 4.6% of brolucizumab-treated eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study demonstrates that injection intervals may be significantly extended with maintained vision and reduced CMT in nAMD eyes switching to brolucizumab therapy from other anti-VEGFs.

Morphological Macular Changes Under Brolucizumab Treatment for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Refractory to Previous Anti-VEGF Treatment Compared with Treatment-Naive Eyes

Purpose

To evaluate the morphological macular changes and fluid dynamics under brolucizumab treatment in eyes refractory to previous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) compared with treatment-naive eyes.

Methods

Retrospective study of all eyes treated with brolucizumab for nAMD between 2020 and 2021 with a fixed injection regimen and one year follow-up. Treatment-naive eyes (TN) were compared with eyes refractory to previous treatment with bevacizumab, ranibizumab, or aflibercept (RT). The primary outcome measure was change of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Secondary outcome measures included foveal central thickness (FCT), presence of intra- or subretinal fluid (IRF, SRF) and presence of pigment epithelial detachment (PED) at any time point during treatment in both groups.

Results

Seventeen TN eyes and 17 RT eyes were included. Mean BCVA and mean FCT in TN eyes had significantly improved after 3 months and continued to improve during treatment (p<0.05 and p=0.001, respectively). In RT eyes, mean BCVA did not change significantly while mean FCT had improved after 3 months of treatment and remained stable thereafter. SRF or PED were more frequent in RT eyes compared with TN eyes (p=0.003 and p=0.005, respectively).

Conclusion

After 3 months of treatment, the BCVA increased significantly only in TN eyes, while the FCT was significantly reduced in both groups. IRF appears to be similarly seen in both groups after the loading phase; however, SRF and PED appear to be more frequent in the RT eyes compared with TN eyes.

Current Treatments and Innovations in Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide. Multiple treatment options have been used over time to attempt to modify the natural progression of the disease in both proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and diabetic macular edema (DME). These two retinal complications are the result of microvascular occlusions and vascular hyperpermeability and are considered one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness in patients of working age. It is now well demonstrated that PDR and DME are associated with increased levels of inflammatory and pro-angiogenic factors in the ocular compartment. To date, laser photocoagulation, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors, and corticosteroids have demonstrated efficacy in their treatment in large randomized controlled trials and in real-life observational studies. This manuscript aims to provide a comprehensive review of current treatments, including the main drugs used in diabetic pathologic manifestations, as well as new therapeutic alternatives, such as extended-release intraocular devices.

Brolucizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration - Indian Real-World Experience: The BRAILLE Study - Fifty-Two-Week Outcomes

Purpose

To report the 52-week real-world efficacy and safety outcomes of brolucizumab therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in Indian eyes.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective, multicentre chart analysis of 82 eyes of 82 patients with nAMD (switch therapy: 65 eyes; treatment-naïve: 17 eyes) with 52-week follow-up data was performed. Pro-re-nata re-treatment was offered based on visual and tomographic criteria. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), central-subfield thickness (CST), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) were the key outcome measures, coupled with the safety profile.

Results

The mean age of the study population was 67.65 (±10.67) years, with 57 male patients (69.5%). The study's mean number of injections was 4.8 (± 0.77). After brolucizumab therapy, the BCVA improved significantly at weeks 4 (P<0.001), and maintained up to week 52 (P<0.001). The CST also reduced significantly at all the visits (Baseline: 413.6 ± 64.6 µm; 52-week: 292.37 ± 13.5 µm; P<0.001). Significantly fewer eyes demonstrated residual SRF (P<0.001) and IRF (P<0.001) at all visits, starting with week 12 and continuing until week 52. The PED resolution was significant from week 24 through week 52 (P=0.004). Each of the 82 eyes received four injections of brolucizumab, with 63.4% (52 eyes) receiving a fifth dose and only 17.1% requiring a sixth. Mild intraocular inflammation (IOI) was seen in three eyes (3.66%) that resolved conservatively. One patient (1.2%) developed mild fever that subsided with oral medications.

Conclusion

The 52-week BRAILLE study demonstrates that brolucizumab is effective and safe in nAMD eyes in a real-world setting. Brolucizumab treatment can reduce the therapeutic burden in patients with nAMD due to its rapid, sustained efficacy and favourable safety profile.

Cost impact of different treatment regimens of brolucizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A budget impact analysis

BACKGROUND: Brolucizumab is a new anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) approved for treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Multiple treatment regimens are available for treating nAMD. These regimens include manufacturer-recommended regimens, pro re nata (PRN) regimens, and treat-and-extend (T&E) regimens, which are based on clinical practice guidelines and data observed in the real-world clinical setting, classified as real-world evidence (RWE). Most budget impact models predict the financial consequences of adding a new drug to the formulary based on the manufacturer-recommended regimen. With different anti-VEGF treatment regimens being used in nAMD by ophthalmologists, it is OBJECTIVE: To estimate the budget impact of different treatment regimens of brolucizumab in nAMD from a US payer perspective. METHODS: A Microsoft Excel-based budget impact model was developed for different treatment regimens of brolucizumab over a 1-year time frame from a US payer perspective. A separate analysis was performed to estimate the budget impact from a US patient population perspective. Model inputs included drug costs, administration costs, physician visit costs, and disease monitoring costs. Outcomes in the budget impact model included the cost per member per month, annual health plan cost, and the US patient population-based annual cost. Based on the prevalence of nAMD in public and commercial health plans, a scenario analysis was conducted on the US population to account for the differences in the drug cost to the public and commercial payers. Further, 1-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to test model assumptions and uncertainty in model inputs. RESULTS: The addition of brolucizumab to the formulary increased the net budgetary impact under PRN and T&E regimens. The maximum increase in expenditure for a hypothetical health plan with 1 million enrollees was associated with the PRN regimen ($824,696), followed by the T&E regimen ($163,101). In contrast, using the manufacturer-recommended and RWE regimens led to an annual saving of $93,068 and $94,170 for the health plan, respectively. In the US patient population model, the introduction of brolucizumab resulted in savings in the manufacturer-recommended ($30.99 million) and RWE regimens ($31.35 million) but led to an increase in annual expenditures for the PRN ($274.58 million) and T&E ($54.30 million) regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Payers need to evaluate the cost impact of different treatment regimens of existing and new anti-VEGFs when making formulary decisions in nAMD management. DISCLOSURES: Mr Siddiqui, Ms Dhumal, Dr Patel, and Dr LeMasters have nothing to disclose. Dr Kamal has received research funding from Cerevel Therapeutics, served as a consultant to Pfizer/Cytel Inc, and received honoraria from Pharmacy Times Continuing Education. Dr Almony has served as a consultant to Cardinal Health and received honoraria from Pharmacy Times Continuing Education and Prime Education.

Current and Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration AMD is one of the leading causes of blindness in the elderly population. An advanced form of AMD known as neovascular AMD (nAMD) is implicated as the main attributor of visual loss among these patients. The hallmark feature of nAMD is the presence of neovascular structures known as choroidal neovascular membranes (CNVs), along with fluid exudation, hemorrhages, and subretinal fibrosis. These pathological changes eventually result in anatomical and visual loss. A type of proangiogenic factor known as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been known to mediate the pathological process behind nAMD. Therefore, therapy has transitioned over the years from laser therapy that ablates the lesions to using Anti-VEGF to target the pathology directly. In this work, we provide an overview of current and emerging therapies for the treatment of nAMD. Currently approved Anti-VEGF agents include ranibizumab, aflibercept, and brolucizumab. Bevacizumab, also an Anti-VEGF agent, is used to manage nAMD even though this is an off-label use. While Anti-VEGF agents have provided a favorable prognosis for nAMD, they are associated with a substantial financial burden for patients and the healthcare system, due to their high cost as well as the need for frequent repeat treatments and visits. Emerging therapies and studies aim to extend the intervals between required treatments and introduce new treatment modalities that would improve patients’ compliance and provide superior results.

Brolucizumab for the Treatment of Degenerative Macular Conditions: A Review of Clinical Studies

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusion represent some of the commonest degenerative conditions that lead to severe vision impairment in the developed countries. The gold standard treatment of complications associated with these conditions is the intravitreal administration of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents. Brolucizumab is a newly developed, humanised, single-chain fragment of a monoclonal antibody binding all VEGF-A isoforms, which was recently approved for the treatment of neovascular AMD. Intravitreal brolucizumab promises to reduce treatment burden for nAMD patients by achieving comparable therapeutic outcomes with fewer clinic visits. Promising also appears its use for the treatment of more challenging maculopathies like diabetic macular oedema (DMO). The aim of this review is to describe the special pharmacological properties of brolucizumab and display the outcomes of the most important clinical trials and real-world studies regarding its efficacy and safety for the management of degenerative macular disorders.

Early Canadian Real-World Experience with Brolucizumab in Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Experienced Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Retrospective Chart Review

Purpose

To assess early real-world outcomes with brolucizumab in Canadian patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) for which they previously received ≥1 anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent(s).

Patients and Methods

This multisite, real-world, retrospective chart review included data from a consecutive sample of 73 patients who received brolucizumab for nAMD after treatment with ≥1 other anti-VEGF agents. The principal reasons for switching to brolucizumab were to extend the treatment interval (51.6% of patients) and to treat persistent macular fluid (34.2%). The primary outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the incidence rates of intraocular inflammation (IOI), retinal vasculitis (RV), and retinal vascular occlusion (RVO). Secondary outcomes included central retinal thickness (CRT), injection interval, and presence of intraretinal and subretinal fluid (IRF and SRF). All parameters were measured at baseline until the last treatment visit between April 27, 2020, and August 31, 2021.

Results

Over a mean follow-up of 28 weeks, a nonsignificant mean improvement in BCVA was identified (4.3 [standard deviation (SD) 8.3] letters; P=0.057), with 47.9% experiencing a gain of ≥5 letters. IOI was detected in 3 patients (4.1%), one of whom also developed RV and RVO (1.4%), which is consistent with existing brolucizumab data. Significant reductions were observed in mean CRT (−36.6 μm [SD 56.1 μm]; P=0.0002) and presence of any macular fluid (56.1% [SD 5.6%]; P<0.001), IRF (66.6% [SD 6.3%]; P<0.001), and SRF (62.7% [SD 6.3%]; P<0.001). The mean injection interval increased significantly by 2.1 weeks (SD 2.7; P<0.001).

Conclusion

In the first real-world Canadian analysis, brolucizumab was associated with improvements in functional outcomes in treatment-experienced patients, consistent with other real-world studies. The incidence of IOI, RV, and RVO were in line with the post hoc safety analysis of HAWK and HARRIER data.

Efficacy and safety of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a randomized trial in Indian patients

BACKGROUND

The current standard treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) involves intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of two anti-VEGF drugs: brolucizumab and aflibercept, in treatment-naïve nAMD Indian patients over a period of 48 weeks.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, single-centre, single-blinded, two-arm comparative study was conducted between March 2021 and February 2022. Of the 114 patients, 56 received intravitreal injections of brolucizumab (6 mg/50 µL) while 58 received aflibercept (2 mg/50 µL). The patients received 03 initial loading doses at 4-week intervals of both the agents and then respective therapies were given as individualized pro re nata (PRN) regimen based on the signs of active macular neovascularization. The functional and anatomical outcomes measured were mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), central macular thickness (CMT, µm), presence of intraretinal fluid, subretinal fluid or subretinal hyper-reflective material. Furthermore, the average number of additional injections required after the loading doses, the injection-free interval and safety of both the drugs were also assessed.

RESULTS

Brolucizumab was found to be non-inferior to aflibercept in terms of mean change in BCVA (-0.13 ± 0.21 logMAR vs. -0.10 ± 0.15 logMAR) and reduction in CMT (-112.59 ± 81.23 µm vs. -86.38 ± 71.82 µm). The percentage of eyes with IRF and SHRM was comparable between both the groups while fewer eyes treated with brolucizumab indicated SRF presence than aflibercept after the loading doses. These beneficial effects of brolucizumab were observed with significant (p < 0.0001) lesser number of injections (1.8 ± 1.1 vs. 3.8 ± 1.5) from week 12 to week 48. Moreover, the probability of no injections after the loading doses was significantly higher with brolucizumab compared to aflibercept indicating prolonged injection-free intervals. The average ocular side effects were comparable in the two groups. One adverse event of severe vitritis requiring treatment with oral steroids occurred in Brolucizumab group, while no such event occurred in Aflibercept group.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study suggest non-inferiority of brolucizumab PRN regimen to aflibercept PRN regimen in treatment naïve nAMD Indian patients while achieving longer inter-injection intervals. Trial registration Clinical Trial Registration of India (CTRI/2021/06/034415). Registered 03 March, 2021, http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=54328&EncHid=&userName  = .

Guidance on brolucizumab management recommendations

PURPOSE

Brolucizumab, a new generation anti-VEGF, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in AMD in the pivotal HAWK and HARRIER trials. Post-marketing, previously undetected adverse events related to intraocular inflammation have been reported. An independent post hoc review of the pivotal trials puts the rate of IOI at 4.6%. The aim of this paper is to propose a set of recommendations for implementing the management of brolucizumab in clinical practice.

METHODS

The recommendations made by the authors are based on their clinical experience, critical review of (i) the pivotal trials, the post-hoc analysis of the Safety Review Committee, (ii), and (iii) the published literature.

RESULTS

In the pivotal trials, brolucizumab showed sustained functional gains, superior anatomical outcomes with potentially longer intervals between injections and a well-tolerated overall safety profile. Adverse events reported post-marketing include retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion. Based on the available information, experts recommend (i) ruling out non-recommended patient profiles (prior history of ORI), (ii) screening the patient prior to each injection to rule out active ORI, (iii) monitoring the patient for early warning signs, and (iv) treating immediately should any adverse events develop.

CONCLUSIONS

The adverse events reported are rare, but may be associated with severe and irreversible loss of visual acuity. The recommendations made are intended to facilitate the management of brolucizumab in the routine practice of retinologists, to ensure patient safety and, should any adverse events occur, to minimise their impact on vision.

Early OCT Angiography Changes of Macular Neovascularization in Patients with Exudative AMD Treated with Brolucizumab in a Real-World Setting

Background

To report on the short-term outcome of intravitreal brolucizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Methods

This is a prospective, interventional, monocentric study on 10 eyes of 10 patients with a treatment-naïve neovascular AMD. Patients were treated according to the HAWK and HARRIER trials. After loading with 3 monthly injections, eyes received an injection 12 weeks after the upload (q12w) or were adjusted to an 8 week interval (q8w), if disease activity was present 8 weeks after the upload. Main outcome measures were the change in central retinal thickness (CRT) assessed by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), the change in macular neovascularization (MNV) size on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), and the change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 8 and 12 weeks after the upload. We further assessed clinical parameters that predict the treatment response at baseline based on the need of q8w or q12w injections after the upload.

Results

CRT decreased significantly from 461.7 ± 82.9 μm to 343.6 ± 74.3 μm (p=0.004) 12 weeks after the upload. The MNV size decreased significantly from 0.85 ± 1.1 to 0.75 ± 1.2 mm² (p=0.022). BCVA improved from 0.67 ± 0.4 to 0.55 ± 0.4logMAR but without statistical significance. MNV size in eyes on q12w was considerably smaller compared to that in eyes on q8w (0.54 ± 0.7 mm² vs. 1.98 ± 2.4 mm²). The percentage of eyes without any persistent fluid was 70% (7/10 eyes).

Conclusions

Brolucizumab appears to be a valuable tool for the management of patients with nAMD. Furthermore, MNV size at baseline might serve as an early predictor of treatment response.

Age-Related Macular Degeneration: New Insights in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is an aging-related ocular disease that can be responsible for severe loss of visual acuity and loss of autonomy in patients [...]

Brolucizumab: Evaluation of Compassionate Use of a Complex Anti-VEGF Therapy

Objective

To report a consecutive series of compassionate, off-label use of intravitreal brolucizumab as a rescue therapy for complex, non-responsive macular edema. This report delineates primary diagnosis, indications for treatment, adverse events, and visual and anatomic outcomes after intravitreal brolucizumab.

Methods

A retrospective review of a consecutive clinical case series of 110 eyes treated with intravitreal brolucizumab between January 1st and March 1st. 2020. All patients were included if they received intravitreal brolucizumab in an off-label delivery and had ongoing macular edema in the setting of prior, multiple intravitreal anti-VEGF and/or intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide. All patients had spectral domain OCT documented before, at the time of, and in serial follow-up after intravitreal brolucizumab.

Results

Ninety-eight of 98 patients had marked decrease in macular edema. Indications for treatment were assigned to the primary etiologic diagnosis leading to the macular edema secondary to radiation retinopathy, complex epiretinal membrane, or complex diabetic retinopathy. In this series, sdOCT central point thickness decreased by an average of 71.5 microns, subretinal fluid resolved, and visual acuity was improved in 40% (greater than two Snellen lines) and stable in 60% (within two Snellen lines). No patient experienced a severe adverse event to specifically include vitritis and/or vasculitis.

Conclusion

In this series, brolucizumab intravitreal injection was associated with significant improvement in macular edema in each diagnostic category. No serious complications to treatment were found in this series. Brolucizumab, though associated with known intraocular inflammation and vasculitis, demonstrated marked benefit in these complex eyes previously unresponsive to aggressive intravitreal pharmacotherapy.

Brolucizumab for persistent macular fluid in neovascular age-related macular degeneration after prior anti-VEGF treatments

Background

Some patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) have persistent intraretinal/subretinal fluid (IRF/SRF) despite being treated with anti-VEGF agents. There is limited data on efficacy of switching to intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) in these patients.

Purpose

To determine anatomic and visual outcomes of eyes with nAMD treated with for persistent IRF/SRF.

Methods

Retrospective series of eyes with nAMD treated initially with aflibercept (IVA, n = 48) and bevacizumab (IVBe, n = 10), then switched to IVBr for persistent IRF/SRF.

Results

In the IVA-IVBr group, a mean of 42 days after one IVBr, mean logMAR changed from 0.50 to 0.49 (p = 0.73) and mean CSFT changed from 340 to 305 µm (p < 0.001); 31% of eyes had no fluid, 42% had persistent but reduced fluid, 25% had stable fluid, and 2% had increased fluid. For a subgroup of 25 eyes that completed a series of 3 IVBr, mean logMAR changed from 0.44 to 0.40 (p = 0.35) and mean CSFT changed from 325 to 277 µm (p = 0.001); 24% of eyes had no fluid at last follow-up, a mean of 54 days after last IVBr. In the IVBe-IVBr group, a mean of 44 days after one IVBr, mean logMAR changed from 0.46 to 0.40 (p = 0.114) and mean CSFT from 401 to 325 µm (p = 0.009); 30% of eyes had no fluid and 70% had persistent but reduced fluid. For a subgroup of four eyes that completed a series of three IVBr, mean logMAR changed from 0.33 to 0.35 (p = 0.391) and mean CSFT improved from 375 to 275 µm (p = 0.001); 50% of eyes had no fluid at last follow-up, a mean of 65 days after last IVBr.

Conclusion

In nAMD eyes previously treated with IVA and IVBe, switching to IVBr significantly reduced persistent IRF/SRF but did not significantly affect visual outcomes.

Brolucizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration - Indian Real-World Experience: The BRAILLE Study

Purpose

To assess the short-term efficacy and safety profile of intravitreal brolucizumab injection in Indian eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) under real-world conditions.

Patients and Methods

This was a multicenter, retrospective chart review of 94 eyes of 94 patients with nAMD (treatment-naïve and switch-therapy) undergoing brolucizumab therapy. Re-treatment as per pro-re-nata protocol was performed based on fixed visual and tomographic criteria. The main outcome measures were changes in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), central subfield thickness (CST), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) along with safety analysis.

Results

Of the 94 eyes, 20 eyes (21.3%) were treatment-naïve, whereas the rest 74 eyes (78.7%) underwent switch therapy. One hundred and twenty-six injections were given over a mean follow-up of 7.3 ± 2.2 (range 5–30) weeks. The BCVA improved significantly from 0.82 ± 0.5 LogMAR at baseline to 0.66 ± 0.5 LogMAR at the final visit (p < 0.0001). Significant reduction in CST was simultaneously noted (Baseline: 408.45 ± 65.63 µm; Final: 281.14 ± 37.74 µm; p < 0.0001). On qualitative analysis, resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF), intraretinal fluid (IRF), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) was observed in 15.5%, 39.29%, and 23.81% of the eyes, respectively. The mean interval of repeat injection was 10.2 ± 2.1 weeks. Three episodes of ocular adverse drug reaction were reported, including two patients developing subretinal hemorrhage while one having a retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) tear. Notably, no intraocular inflammation (IOI) was seen in any of the eyes, and no systemic side effects were identified.

Conclusion

In a real-world scenario, brolucizumab therapy is efficacious and safe in the management of nAMD over the short term. Further long-term studies are warranted to validate these findings. Additionally, lack of ocular inflammation after 126 brolucizumab injections in our Indian data is peculiar and underlines the necessity to explore the role of race and genetics in predisposing to/safeguarding against brolucizumab-related IOIs.

Initial Pro Re Nata Brolucizumab for Exudative AMD: The PROBE Study

The present study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of pro re nata (PRN) intravitreal brolucizumab therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) without a loading dose in the real-world setting. The PROBE study (Pro Re Nata Brolucizumab for Exudative AMD) is a retrospective, observational, multicentric study that included 27 treatment-naïve patients (27 eyes) with neovascular AMD who received PRN brolucizumab therapy with the treatment interval being at least 8 weeks, should the need for a second consecutive injection arise. The primary outcome measure was changed to best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over time. Secondary outcome measures included the determination of change in central subfield thickness (CST) and complications. The mean follow-up was 11.2 ± 1.2 months. The mean baseline and final BCVA were 57.4 ± 4.5 letters and 65.3 ± 3.12 letters, respectively (p = 0.014). The mean gain in letters at the end of follow-up was 7.8 ± 3.5 letters. There was a significant decrease in CST at the end of the follow-up period (p = 0.013). Patients received a mean of 2.2 ± 0.9 injections (in addition to the first mandatory injection) during the follow-up period. There were no adverse events noted. In conclusion, initial PRN brolucizumab for exudative AMD without a loading dose demonstrated significant visual improvement and no adverse events.

Comparison of Outcomes between 3 Monthly Brolucizumab and Aflibercept Injections for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

We compared the short-term outcomes between 3-monthly aflibercept and brolucizumab injections for treatment-naïve polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). A total of 52 eyes were included. Patients received 3 monthly intravitreal aflibercept (n = 38) or intravitreal brolucizumab (n = 14). Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) was performed at baseline and at the 3-month visit. Selection of anti-VEGF agents depended on time. In the brolucizumab-treated group, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved from 0.27 ± 0.34 (log MAR unit) at baseline to 0.20 ± 0.24 at 3-month visit, which is comparable with the aflibercept-treated group (p = 0.87), after adjustment of confounding factors. Central retinal thickness significantly decreased by 43%−44% in both groups. Subfoveal choroidal thickness also significantly decreased by 20.5% during this interval in the brolucizumab-treated group, which was greater than the aflibercept-treated group. The complete resolution rate of polypoidal lesions on ICGA was significantly higher (p = 0.043) in the brolucizumab-treated group (78.6%) than in the aflibercept-treated group (42.1%). Intraocular inflammation was observed in 14.3% (2/14) in the brolucizumab-treated group only. In short-term follow-up, intravitreal injection of 3-monthly brolucizumab was comparable with aflibercept in terms of BCVA and morphological improvement along with higher resolution of polypoidal lesion(s) on ICGA.