Comparative Longitudinal Analysis of Malignant Transformation in Pleomorphic Adenoma and Recurrent Pleomorphic Adenoma

Clinical behavior of recurrent pleomorphic adenoma in the palate: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review analyzed the clinical behavior and odds of malignancy of the palatal recurrent pleomorphic adenomas.

METHODS

Systematic review of patients with recurrent pleomorphic adenoma arising in the palate. Database search: MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, EMBASE, Virtual Health Library, Google Scholar, and OpenGrey. A binomial logistic regression was performed to assess the odds of detecting recurrence five, 10 and 20 years after the treatment of primary tumor.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies (n = 18 patients) out of 336 were included. The recurrent pleomorphic adenoma in palate was more common in females (61.6%), average age was 49 years old (range 9-73 years old). Four patients progressed to malignant transformation. The odds ratio (OR) of detecting a recurrence at 10 (OR = 5.57; 95% confidence interval - 95%CI 1.13-27.52), and 20 years (OR = 18.78; 95%CI 3.18-110.84) after treatment of primary pleomorphic adenoma was significantly higher than at one-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The recurrence of pleomorphic adenoma in palate remains a rare event of late occurrence. It mainly affects middle-aged female and carries a risk of malignant transformation. Although uncommon, patients with palatal pleomorphic adenoma should be warned about the possibility of recurrence or malignant transformation of tumor at advanced ages.

Don't SUMP it! Utility of PLAG1 immunocytochemistry in basaloid SUMP subcategory

BACKGROUND

Basaloid salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (B-SUMP) is an indeterminate diagnostic subcategory, with pleomorphic adenoma (PA) representing the most common benign neoplasm. Pleomorphic adenoma gene 1 (PLAG1) staining is frequently seen in PAs and could aid in distinguishing them from other basaloid neoplasms. The authors evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunocytochemistry (ICC) in differentiating PAs from other basaloid neoplasms in smears and liquid-based cytology (LBC) specimens.

METHODS

In total, 45 B-SUMP cytology aspirates and corresponding surgical excision specimens were identified. PLAG1 immunostaining was performed in all aspirates and surgical excision specimens and was scored as positive (strong/diffuse), equivocal (focal/weak), or negative.

RESULTS

PLAG1 ICC was performed directly on 38 smears and seven LBC specimens. PLAG1 was positive in 29 of 45 cases (64%), whereas six of 45 (13%) were equivocal, and 10 of 45 (22%) were negative. PLAG1-positive aspirates included 26 (90%) PAs, two (7%) basal cell adenomas (BCAs), and one (3%) carcinoma ex-PA. PLAG1-equivocal aspirates included four (67%) PAs and two (33%) BCAs, whereas negative aspirates included five (50%) BCAs, four (40%) adenoid cystic carcinomas, and one (10%) metastatic adenosquamous carcinoma. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were 87%, 86%, 93%, and 75%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was 87%.

CONCLUSIONS

PLAG1 ICC is useful when positive (strong/diffuse) and can be reliably performed on smears and LBC specimens. PLAG1 was positive in most PAs and in a small subset of BCAs. Therefore, in the absence of atypical cytologic features, PLAG1-positive tumors could be diagnosed as benign, with a note favoring PA versus BCA. In contrast, PLAG1-negative/equivocal tumors should remain in the B-SUMP category.

Recurrent pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland: A population-based study with emphasis on re-recurrence and malignant transformation

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyze the prognostic determinants for re-recurrence and malignant transformation of parotid recurrent pleomorphic adenoma (RPA).

METHODS

Between January 2011 and December 2020, all the cases of RPA of the parotid gland at our single institution were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients were included in this study, with a median age of 41.5 years, and 20 (11.9%) patients developed re-recurrence during follow-up. It has been evidenced that recurrence times (single or multiple) was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival (p = 0.0264). A total of 26 (15.48%) patients experienced malignant transformation of parotid RPA, and older age (>45 year old), male sex, and higher clinical tumor staging (T3-T4) were significantly associated with malignant transformation of parotid RPA.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence times was an independent prognostic factor for re-recurrence of parotid RPA, and older male with high T-stage may more easily develop malignant transformation.

An organoid library of salivary gland tumors reveals subtype-specific characteristics and biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Salivary gland tumors (SGTs) include a large group of rare neoplasms in the head and neck region, and the heterogeneous and overlapping features among the subtypes frequently make diagnostic difficulties. There is an urgent need to understand the cellular mechanisms underlying the heterogeneity and overlap among the subtypes, and explore the subtype-specific diagnostic biomarkers.

METHODS

The tumor tissue and the adjacent normal tissue from the 6 most common types of SGTs were processed for organoid culture which only maintained tumor epithelial cells. Organoids were histologically evaluated based on phenotype markers, followed by transcriptional profiling using RNA-sequencing. The transcriptomic similarities and differences among the subtypes were analyzed by subtype consensus clustering and hierarchical clustering. Furthermore, by comparative transcriptional analysis for these 6 types of SGTs and the matched organoids, the potential diagnostic biomarkers from tumor epithelium were identified, in which two selected biomarkers were evaluated by qPCR and confirmed by immunohistochemistry staining using a tissue microarray.

RESULTS

We generated a biobank of patient-derived organoids (PDOs) with 6 subtypes of SGTs, including 21 benign and 24 malignant SGTs. The PDOs recapitulated the morphological and transcriptional characteristics of the parental tumors. The overlap in the cell types and the heterogenous growth patterns were observed in the different subtypes of organoids. Comparing the bulk tissues, the cluster analysis of the PDOs remarkably revealed the epithelial characteristics, and visualized the intrinsic relationship among these subtypes. Finally, the exclusive biomarkers for the 6 most common types of SGTs were uncovered by comparative analysis, and PTP4A1 was demonstrated as a useful diagnostic biomarker for mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

We established the first organoid biobank with multiple subtypes of SGTs. PDOs of SGTs recapitulate the morphological and transcriptional characteristics of the original tumors, which uncovers subtype-specific biomarkers and reveals the molecular distance among the subtype of SGTs.

Lip pleomorphic adenomas: case series and literature review

BACKGROUND

Pleomorphic adenoma (PA) is the most frequent benign salivary gland tumor, but a lip PA is rare. Although this tumor may be definitively diagnosed by imaging or a tissue biopsy if it is reasonably large, PAs on the lip are relatively small, and they present findings that are similar to those of other lip lesions, which can make a preoperative diagnosis difficult.

METHODS

We analyzed all PAs in the oral region and lesions on the lips treated in our department over the past 20 years, and we discuss them together with the relevant literature.

RESULTS

We found that 11.8% (n=6) of the PAs occurred on a lip (upper lip: 9.8%, lower lip: 2.0%), and ~1% of all mass lesions of the lips were PAs. The average size of the lip PAs was 1.5±0.7 cm (range, 0.7-2.2 cm). For preoperative diagnostic assistance, ultrasonography (US) (n=4), magnetic resonance (MR) (n=3), or no imaging (n=2) was used. An excisional biopsy was performed in all cases, and to date, no recurrence or malignant transformation has been observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Lip PA is relatively rare. Because almost all of these lesions are small, a preoperative diagnosis is more difficult compared to palatal lesions. This tumor is also prone to long-term neglect and has the potential for recurrence and malignant transformation. It is thus necessary to perform an excision that includes the capsule and surrounding tissues, and careful postoperative follow-up should be continued.

Maxillary Sinus Pleomorphic Adenoma: A Systematic Review

Background: Pleomorphic adenoma (PA), also known as a mixed tumor, is a neoplasm of the glandular tissue. The maxillary sinus (MS) is an atypical location of PA; however, as an empty cavity inside the bone, it predisposes tumors to develop unnoticed. The aim of the following systematic review was to identify and characterize the diagnostics and prognosis of maxillary sinus pleomorphic adenoma (MSPA). Methods: The cases of MSPA that underwent treatment and were observed for possible recurrence were qualified for the review. The medical databases were searched using the following engines: ACM, BASE, Google Scholar and PubMed. The risk of bias was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Tool for Case Reports. The extracted data were tabulated and summarized in a descriptive manner. Results: To the best knowledge of the authors, only seven cases of MSPA were described in the last 20 years. Relapse occurred in three of these cases and malignant transformation occurred in two. The longest recorded time without recurrence was 4 years. The size of the detected MSPA in the largest dimension ranged in various cases from 40 to 60 mm, with an average of 48 mm. Discussion: All but one of the seven included reports showed flaws during the risk of bias assessment. Only in two of seven reported cases was there no reason to suspect that the tumor had penetrated the sinus from the oral or nasal cavity. The MS is disadvantageous as a location as tumors occupying the entire volume of the sinus are often diagnosed. Recurrences and malignant transformations seem to be frequent and often remain undetected for a prolonged period. Other information: This research received no external funding. OSF Registries number: 8KVGM.