Effects of Different Air Particle Abrasion Protocols on the Biaxial Flexural Strength and Fractography of High/Ultra-Translucent Zirconia

Enhancing surface energy and characterizing optical properties of ultra-high translucency zirconia via an innovative heat treatment process

PURPOSE

Ultra-high translucency zirconia (UT-Zr) is known for its high esthetic quality; however, its inert surface results in low hydrophilicity and surface energy (SE). To address this limitation, this study proposes an innovative zirconia heat treatment process (ZHTP) and aims to evaluate the effects of ZHTP on the surface characteristics of UT-Zr, offering a novel and practical approach for surface pretreatment in dental practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The plate-shaped UT-Zr samples were fabricated. After sintering, the samples without additional staining or polishing were divided into the following nine groups: NT (no additional pretreatment), AB (airborne-particle abrasion), PL (nonthermal plasma), PO (polishing), HPO (fine-polishing), NTH (treat with ZHTP), POPL (PL followed by PO), POH (ZHTP followed by PO), and HPOH (ZHTP followed by HPO). The surface roughness (Ra), microstructure, transmittance, glossiness, wettability, and SE of the samples (n = 10), and statistical analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

AB showed the highest Ra and lowest glossiness (P < 0.05), while HPO and HPOH yielded the smoothest surfaces, with HPOH achieving the highest glossiness (P < 0.05). Although the ZHTP approach slightly improved transmittance, it did not affect the microstructure. PO reduced hydrophilicity and SE (P < 0.05), and HPO slightly increased them. PL significantly enhanced both properties (P < 0.05), and ZHTP also increased them (P < 0.05) to levels similar to PL. Notably, hydrophilicity in nonthermal plasma and ZHTP-treated samples decreased similarly after 24 h.

CONCLUSIONS

The ZHTP approach enhances UT-Zr wettability and SE, with slight transmittance improvement. HPOH achieves hydrophilicity and SE comparable to PL, validating ZHTP as a promising strategy for UT-Zr surface optimization in dental applications.

Effect of the Intaglio Surface Treatment and Thickness of Different Types of Yttria-Stabilized Tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystalline Materials on the Flexural Strength: In-Vitro Study

BACKGROUND

Surface treatment of the intaglio surface of zirconia is important for bonding. However, it could affect the strength of the materials. The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of laser, etching, and air abrasion surface treatment methods to a control group on the flexural strength of three zirconia materials with two different thicknesses. (1) Methods: A total of 120 disks were divided into three groups according to the type of zirconia and the ceramic thickness. Then, according to the surface treatment method, the groups were divided into four subdivisions. The change in the microstructure of the ceramic material was investigated through Scanning Electron Microscope (EVO LS10, Carl Zeiss SMT Ltd. Oberkochen, Germany). Phase identification was performed using an X-ray diffraction device (XRD; Ultimate IV X-ray Diffractometer, Rigaku Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The flexural strength was assessed with a biaxial flexural strength test in a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using SPSS Software (SPSS version 26.0.Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). A three-way ANOVA and a post hoc Dunnett T3 test were employed to evaluate the effect of the yttria concentration, thickness, and surface treatment on the flexural strength of zirconia (α = 0.05). (2) Results: At 0.8 mm thickness, air abrasion significantly increased the flexural strength of 3Y-TZP (1130.6 ± 171.3 MPa) and 4Y-TZP (872 ± 108.6 MPa). However, air abrasion significantly decreased the flexural strength of 5Y-TZP materials (373 ± 46.8 MPa). Laser irradiation significantly decreased the flexural strength of 5Y-TZP (347 ± 50.3 MPa), while etching significantly decreased the flexural strength of both 3Y-TZP (530 ± 48.8) and 4Y-TZP (457.1 ± 57.3). When the thickness increased to 1 mm, air abrasion continued to significantly decrease the flexural strength of 5Y-TZP materials. (3) Conclusions: There was a negative effect of surface treatment on the flexural strength at 0.8 mm thickness rather than at 1 mm thickness. Air abrasion enhances the flexural strength of 3Y-TZP and 4Y-TZP materials but significantly reduces the flexural strength of 5Y-TZP materials. Zircos-E etching and Er:YAG surface treatment methods did not significantly reduce the flexural strength of 5Y-TZP materials at 1 mm thickness and can be recommended as an alternative surface treatment for 5Y-TZP materials.

Effect of different surface treatments and adhesive cementation on the surface topography and flexural strength of translucent and ultra-translucent monolithic zirconia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of different surface treatments and adhesive cementation on the miniflexural strength (MFS) of monolithic zirconia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two-hundred and forty (240) sintered bars of translucent zirconia (ZT) and ultra-translucent zirconia (ZUT) were obtained (8 mm ×2 mm ×1 mm). The bars were divided into 16 groups (n = 15) according to the factors "Zirconia" (ZT and ZUT), "Cementation" (Cem) and "surface treatment" (Ctrl:Control, Al:Aluminum oxide/Al2O3 50 µm, Si:Silica/SiO2 coated alumina particles oxide 30 µm, Gl:Glazing+hydrofluoric acid). Half of the bars received an adhesive layer application, followed by application of resin cement and light curing. The surface roughness was measured in non-cemented groups. All the bars were subjected to the MFS test (1.0 mm/min; 100 kgf). Scanning electron microscopy was used for qualitative analyses. MFS data (MPa) and roughness (µm) were statistically evaluated by three-way and two-way ANOVA respectively and Tukey's test (5%).

RESULTS

The surface treatment and the interaction were significant for roughness. Glazing promoted less roughness compared to silicatization. Regarding MFS, only the zirconia and surface treatment factors were significant. For ZT, the sandblasted groups had an increase in MFS and glazing reduced it. There was no difference between the groups without cementation for the ZUT; however, ZUT.Si/Cem, and ZUT.Al/Cem obtained superior MFS among the cemented groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Sandblasting increases the flexural strength for ZT, while glaze application tends to reduce it. Applying resin cement increases the flexural strength of ZUT when associated with sandblasting. Sandblasting protocols promote greater surface roughness.

The Effect of Restoration Thickness on the Fracture Resistance of 5 mol% Yttria-Containing Zirconia Crowns

BACKGROUND

To determine what thickness of 5 mol% yttria zirconia (5Y-Z) translucent crowns cemented with different cements and surface treatments would have equivalent fracture resistance as 3 mol% yttria (3Y-Z) crowns.

METHODS

The study included 0.8 mm, 1.0 mm, and 1.2 mm thickness 5Y-Z (Katana UTML) crowns and 0.5 and 1.0 mm thickness 3Y-Z (Katana HT) crowns as controls. The 5Y-Z crowns were divided among three treatment subgroups (n = 10/subgroup): (1) cemented using RMGIC (Rely X Luting Cement), (2) alumina particle-abraded then luted with the same cement, (3) alumina particle-abraded and cemented using a resin cement (Panavia SA Cement Universal). The 3Y-Z controls were alumina particle-abraded then cemented with RMGIC. The specimens were then loaded in compression at 30° until failure.

RESULTS

All 5Y-Z crowns (regardless of thickness or surface treatment) had a similar to or higher fracture force than the 0.5 mm 3Y-Z crowns. Only the 1.2 mm 5Y-Z crowns with resin cement showed significantly similar fracture force to the 1 mm 3Y-Z crowns.

CONCLUSION

In order to achieve a similar fracture resistance to 0.5 mm 3Y-Z crowns cemented with RMGIC, 5Y-Z crowns may be as thin as 0.8 mm. To achieve a similar fracture resistance to 1.0 mm 3Y-Z crowns cemented with RMGIC, 5Y-Z crowns must be 1.2 mm and bonded with resin cement.

Qualitative SEM analysis of fracture surfaces for dental ceramics and polymers broken by flexural strength testing and crown compression

PURPOSE

To perform qualitative analysis using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of fracture surfaces for ceramic and polymeric dental materials broken via standardized flexural and crunch-the-crown (CTC) tests.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Zirconia, glass-ceramic, and polymeric (Trilor; TRI, Juvora; JUV, Pekkton; PEK) materials were loaded using crowns for CTC tests, discs (zirconia and glass-ceramics) for piston-on-3 ball tests, bars (polymer) for 3-point bend tests, and bars (zirconia, glass-ceramics) for 4-point bend tests. SEM was used to characterize the fracture surfaces and identify fracture surface features (e.g., origin, mist, hackle, and the direction of crack propagation [DCP]). Electron dispersive spectroscopy was used to identify the local chemistry.

RESULTS

Fracture surface features were found to be less visually apparent for glass-ceramics than zirconia. For zirconia bars, fractures originated roughly midway between the corner and center for processing defects related to sintering. Fractures originated at the bottom corners of glass-ceramic bars (void or surface flaw) and PEK bars (surface flaw). TRI bar failures exposed glassy fibers. Fracture features were generally less discernable for discs compared to bars for zirconia and glass-ceramics. Ceramic crowns fractured into 2 to 3 pieces, with fractures originating at the occlusal surface and clear evidence for the DCP. Failures of TRI and JUV specimens (bars and crowns) were less catastrophic than for the ceramics, with exposed fibers (TRI) and surface cracks (JUV). PEK crown and bar fractures presented dimple (ductile) features formed due to microvoid coalescence followed by brittle crack propagation.

CONCLUSIONS

The critical flaws responsible for failure initiation were a function of material composition and test configuration. Fractographic analysis can reveal problems associated with the manufacturing of materials, their handling, grinding and finishing/polishing procedures, the structural design and choice of material, and the quality of the final laboratory-delivered restoration.

Fracture analysis of one/two-piece clinically failed zirconia dental implants

OBJECTIVES

Analyzing factors that may have led to fracture of zirconia implants by macro/micro-fractography.

METHODS

Six one-piece and ten two-piece full-ceramic zirconia implants from two manufacturers, Z-Systems and CeraRoot, were retrieved after clinical failure. The time-to-failure ranged from 3 to 49 months. Optical and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to analyze the fracture planes at the macro- and microscopic level. Treatment planning, surgical protocol, fracture-origin location and characteristic fracture features were assessed.

RESULTS

The fracture of all implants seemed to have been primarily due to overload in bending mode, while the fracture-initiation sites varied for the one- and two-piece implants. The fracture of all one-piece implants originated in the constriction region between two threads in the endosseous implant part. For two-piece implants, the abutment neck, internal abutment-implant connections and inner threads were found to be the main fracture-initiation sites. Surface defects at the root area for one-piece implants and damages at the abutment surface for two-piece implants were connected to the fracture origins. Importantly, the clinical failures of implants were often found to result from combined effects related to patient aspects, treatment planning/protocols, a high bending moment at the weakest link, implant-surface conditions and specific implant designs.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study provided information to be considered for future optimization of treatment planning and the surgical protocol for zirconia implants. Optimization of the surface conditions and the zirconia-starting powder were also suggested.

Adhesive Cementation of Zirconia Based Ceramics-Surface Modification Methods Literature Review

Introduction: The conditioning procedures for glass-based ceramic restorations before adhesive cementation are generally recognized. In the case of polycrystalline ceramics, which include zirconium oxide, there is still no standardized protocol. The aim of this work was to present conditioning methods of the cementation surface of zirconium oxide fixed dentures. The new generation high translucency zirconia has been also considered. Material and method: The following keywords for the PUBMED and EMBASE databases were used: zirconium oxide, zirconium oxide with increased translucency, bond strength, bending strength, surface treatment. The inclusion criteria were original papers in English published between 2015–2021. Results: Out of 1537 publications, 53 articles were selected for the study, covering methods of conditioning zirconium ceramics, including new materials with increased translucency. These procedures were divided into 5 main groups. Summary: Due to the widespread use of zirconia ceramics and the introduction of new zirconia-based materials, the use of a predictable and standardized cementation protocol is one of the most important factors contributing to the long-term clinical success of prosthetic restorations. Therefore, the research showed differences in the properties of the covered materials after conditioning. It suggests the need to create separate conditioning protocols for highly translucent and traditional zirconia.