Factors Associated with Increased Risk of Urosepsis during Pregnancy and Treatment Outcomes, in a Urology Clinic

Double-J Ureteral Stenting in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Pivotal or Problematic?

Background and Objectives: Double-J stents are urinary catheters that are frequently used in urology. They are now also used in other specialist areas such as obstetrics and gynecology. However, the use of double-J stents is not without side effects. The aim of this review was to highlight the indications and possible adverse effects of the use of these stents in obstetrics and gynecology. Materials and Methods: We analyzed works published after 1995 in the PUBMED, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases related to the use of double-J stents in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as reported adverse events. We carried out a narrative review of the available literature on this topic. Results: We identified 69 relevant publications that we included in the review. In obstetrics, indications include the treatment of gestational hydronephrosis, some urological conditions during pregnancy, such as obstructive urinary calculi, with or without superinfection, or intraoperative use for cesarean section or hysterectomy after cesarean section, to protect from, or to solve, ureteral lesions. In gynecology, they are used preoperatively or intraoperatively to protect the ureter during gynecological operations in the pelvic area or postoperatively to repair some ureteral injuries. They are also indicated for ureteral obstructions that occur after pelvic radiotherapy for gynecological neoplasms. Complications associated with the use of double-J stents include more frequent urinary tract infections, lower urinary tract symptoms, calcifications and misplacements. Conclusions: Double-J stents are widely used in obstetrics and gynecology and are characterized by good efficiency and safety, although some side effects may occur (lower urinary tract symptoms, hematuria, complications in birth outcomes), which do not limit their use. Summary of evidence: In this review, we analyzed the indications and complications of double-J ureteral stenting in obstetric and gynecologic patients. We found that the procedure is safe, both in the treatment of ureteral obstruction and in the resolution of postoperative complications. No serious complications of ureteral stenting have been noted that would constitute a contraindication to its use. Future prospective studies in large patient cohorts are necessary to validate our data.

Multidrug-Resistant Urinary Tract Infections in Pregnant Patients and Their Association with Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes-A Retrospective Study

Background/Objectives: Multidrug-resistant urinary tract infections (MDR UTIs) constitute an important public health problem, especially in pregnant patients. The aim of this retrospective study was to characterize the bacterial spectrum and the profile of microbial resistance in cases of UTIs occurring in pregnant women, as well as their impact on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. Methods: A total of 371 pregnant patients with UTIs were included in the analysis and were segregated into the following groups based on the type of bacterial resistance to antibiotics: MDR UTIs (70 patients, group 1), UTIs resistant to one class of antibiotics (108 patients, group 2), UTIs resistant to two classes of antibiotics (102 patients, group 3), and sensitive UTIs (91 patients, group 4). We used descriptive statistics for characterizing and comparing the microbial spectrum and the clinical characteristics of the patients. A multinomial logistic regression model for evaluating the relationship between the type of urinary tract infection and adverse obstetric or neonatal outcomes was employed. Results: In the case of MDR UTIs, the bacterial spectrum mainly included Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, and Klebsiella species. We found almost universal resistance to ampicillin. Our data confirmed an increased risk of preterm birth, premature rupture of membranes, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, and neonatal intensive care unit admission for patients with MDR infections. Conclusions: The increased incidence of pathogens resistant to commonly used antibiotic classes in pregnancy suggests the need for the development of local and national protocols that adapt therapeutic and prophylactic regimens to clinical realities.

Distinct maternofetal immune signatures delineate preterm birth onset following urinary tract infection

Preterm birth is the leading cause of infant mortality resulting in over one million neonatal deaths annually. Maternal urinary tract infection (UTI) during pregnancy increases risk for preterm birth; however, biological processes mediating UTI-associated preterm birth are not well-described. We established a murine maternal UTI model in which challenge with uropathogenic E. coli resulted in preterm birth in about half of dams. Dams experiencing preterm birth displayed excessive bladder inflammation and altered uteroplacental T cell polarization compared to non-laboring infected dams, with no differences in bacterial burdens. Additional factors associated with preterm birth included higher proportions of male fetuses and lower maternal serum IL-10. Furthermore, exogenous maternal IL-10 treatment absolved UTI-associated preterm birth but contributed to fetal growth restriction in this model. Using urine samples from a cohort of human pregnancies with or without UTI, we correlated urinary cytokines with birth outcomes and urine culture status. These analyses yielded a non-invasive, highly predictive three-model system for evaluating preterm birth risk implicating cytokines IL-10, IL-15, IL-1β, and IL-1RA. Our unique bimodal murine model coupled with patient samples provides a platform to investigate immunological and microbial factors governing UTI-associated preterm birth, revealing novel therapeutic opportunities to predict or prevent preterm birth.

Particularities of Pyelonephritis With Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Germs During Pregnancy: A Case-Control Study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics of pyelonephritis with multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria in pregnant women in comparison to pyelonephritis with multidrug-sensitive bacteria in this particular patient group.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study over a period of three years on a study group of 17 pregnant patients with pyelonephritis with MDR bacteria and on a control group of 52 pregnant patients with pyelonephritis with multidrug-sensitive bacteria. We analyzed the demographic data, the potential risk factors, aspects of the clinical picture, the incidence and type of bacteria involved, and their sensitivity spectrum.

RESULTS

The patients in the study group had pyelonephritis on the right side (N=10, 58.83%), were in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy (N=16, 94.12%), and had a high percentage of anemia (N=9, 52.94%), as did the control group. Unlike the patients in the control group, the patients in the study group had a higher incidence of antibiotic treatment (N=17,100% vs. N=14, 29.92%, p<0.001), previous urological surgery, especially ureteral catheterization with insertion of double-J catheters (N=9, 52.94% vs. N=9, 17.30%, p=0.003), and an increased incidence of urosepsis on admission (N=11, 64.70% vs. N=11, 21.15%, p<0.001). E. coli (N=8, 47.05% vs. N=28, 53.85%, p=0.626) and Klebsiella pn. (N=5, 29.41% vs. N=12, 23.07%, p=0.598) were predominant in both study groups. Also, the hospitalization days were significantly higher in the study group compared with the control group (N=7.38±2,91 vs. N=5.02±1,87, p=0.002). The spectrum of microbial resistance was increased in favor of the study group for all antibiotics tested, with the exception of ampicillin, where resistance was increased in both groups. The Gram-negative bacteria responsible for the pyelonephritis in both groups retained 100% sensitivity to carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant women in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy who have undergone right-sided double-J catheter insertion during pregnancy and/or who have received antibiotic treatment in the past are at increased risk for pyelonephritis with MDR. E. coli and Klebsiella pn., bacteria are most commonly involved and maintain susceptibility to carbapenems and reserve penicillins.

Maternal-Fetal Complications in Renal Colic during Pregnancy: A Scoping Review

Renal colic is one of the most common non-obstetric causes of hospitalization in pregnant women. Its management is often a challenge for obstetricians/gynecologists, urologists and neonatologists due to the complexity of the problem. The aim of this study was to analyze the possible maternal-fetal complications in renal colic during pregnancy. The authors performed a scoping review of the current literature regarding the analyzed issues. The review was conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. The search generated a total of 237 articles, out of which 7 original studies were ultimately included in the scoping review. In the women affected by renal colic, the incidence of perinatal complications such as urinary tract infections (UTIs), premature rupture of membranes (pPROM), and preterm birth is markedly higher than reported in the general population of pregnant women. Data regarding the recurrence of other perinatal complications such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), preeclampsia (PE), and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) are scarce and ambiguous. Further research on these issues is needed to improve the perinatal outcomes of the affected pregnancies.

Development of a Predictive Nomogram for Sepsis in Patients with Urolithiasis-Related Obstructive Pyelonephritis

Background and Objectives: In patients with urolithiasis-related obstructive pyelonephritis (UROP), sepsis represents a critical and concerning complication that can substantially increase the mortality rate. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for sepsis in UROP patients and to develop a predictive nomogram model. Materials and Methods: We analyzed data from 148 patients who met the UROP criteria and were admitted to Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2021. The primary outcome evaluated was the incidence of sepsis, as defined by the most recent Sepsis-3 guidelines. To identify potential risk factors for sepsis, we employed the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression technique. Subsequently, we utilized multivariable logistic regression to construct the predictive model. Results: There was a total of 102 non-sepsis cases and 46 sepsis cases. Risk factors for sepsis in multivariable analysis were a history of diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR = 4.24, p = 0.007), shock index (SI) (×10-1) (OR = 1.55, p < 0.001), C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/dL) (OR = 1.08, p = 0.005), and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (×10) (OR = 1.58, p = 0.007). The nomogram exhibited an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.890 (95% CI 0.830-0.949). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that patients with UROP who have DM, higher SI, higher NLR, and elevated CRP levels are significantly more likely to develop sepsis. These insights may aid in risk stratification, and it is imperative that clinicians promptly initiate treatment for those identified as high risk.

Urinary Tract Infections with Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Urology Clinic-A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to analyze the factors associated with the increased risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) with carbapenem-resistant (CR) Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kpn) and the antibiotic resistance spectrum of the strains in patients. As secondary objectives, we elaborated the profile of these patients and the incidence of different types of carbapenemases.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case-control study in which we compared a group of 62 patients with urinary tract infections with CR Kpn with a control group consisting of 136 patients with urinary tract infections with multidrug-resistant (MDR), but carbapenem-sensitive (CS), Kpn, who were hospitalized between 1 January 2022 and 31 March 2024.

RESULTS

Compared to patients with urinary tract infections with CS Kpn, patients with urinary tract infections with CR Kpn were preponderant in rural areas (62.9% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.038) and more frequently had an upper urinary tract infection (69.4% vs. 36.8%, p < 0.01). Among the risk factors examined, patients in the study group had a higher presence of urinary catheters inserted for up to one month (50% vs. 34.6%, p = 0.03), rate of hospitalization in the last 180 days (96.8% vs. 69.9%, p < 0.01) and incidence of antibiotic therapy in the last 180 days (100% vs. 64.7%, p < 0.01). They also had a higher rate of carbapenem treatment in the last 180 days (8.1% vs. 0%, p < 0.01). Patients in the study group had a broader spectrum of resistance to all antibiotics tested (p < 0.01), with the exception of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, where the resistance rate was similar in both groups (80.6% vs. 67.6%, p = 0.059). In the multivariate analysis, transfer from other hospitals (OR = 3.51, 95% and CI: 1.430-8.629) and treatment with carbapenems in the last 180 days (OR = 11.779 and 95% CI: 1.274-108.952) were factors associated with an increased risk of disease compared to the control group. The presence of carbapenemases was observed in all patients with CR Kpn, in the order of frequency New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase (NDM) (52.2%), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) (32.6%), and carbapenem-hydrolyzing oxacillinase (Oxa-48) (15.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The environment of origin and previous treatment with carbapenems appear to be the factors associated with an increased risk of urinary tract infection with CR Kpn compared to patients with urinary tract infections with CS Kpn. CR Kpn exhibits a broad spectrum of antibiotic resistance, among which is resistance to carbapenem antibiotics.

The Impact of Urinary Catheterization on the Antibiotic Susceptibility of ESBL-Producing Enterobacterales: A Challenging Duo

INTRODUCTION

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is currently a growing concern among healthcare providers, underscoring the importance of describing the regional susceptibility profile for common microorganisms that are associated with urinary tract infections (UTIs). This knowledge serves as the foundation for proper empirical therapeutic recommendations tailored to local susceptibility patterns.

RESULTS

We found a high prevalence of ESBL-producing strains (36.9%), with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. being the most prevalent isolated bacteria. Among the catheterized patients, Klebsiella spp. emerged as the primary etiology, with a significant correlation between catheterization and Proteus spp. (p = 0.02) and Providencia stuartii (p < 0.0001). We observed significant correlations between urinary catheterization and older age (68.9 ± 13.7 years vs. 64.2 ± 18.1 years in non-catheterized patients, p = 0.026) and with the presence of an isolate with extensive drug resistance (p < 0.0001) or even pandrug resistance (p < 0.0001). Susceptibility rates significantly decreased for almost all the tested antibiotics during the study period. Notably, susceptibility was markedly lower among catheterized patients, with the most pronounced differences observed for carbapenems (59.6% versus 83.4%, p < 0.0001) and aminoglycosides (37.1% versus 46.9%, p = 0.0001).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study analyzing the susceptibility profiles of 724 extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales isolated from urine cultures. Our focus was on highlighting susceptibility profiles among isolates associated with urinary catheterization and assessing the shifts in the susceptibility rates over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The constant rise in AMR rates among Enterobacterales presents significant challenges in treating severe infections, particularly among urinary catheterized patients. This trend leaves clinicians with limited or no effective treatment options. Consequently, the development and implementation of personalized treatment protocols are imperative to ensure efficient empirical therapies.

Efficacy and Safety of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in Patients With Infected Ureterohydronephrosis Due to Ureteral Stones Following Double-J Catheter Insertion

INTRODUCTION

Double-J ureteral catheters in patients with ureteral lithiasis undergoing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) procedures reduce the efficacy of the procedure or have no effect on the stone-free rate. However, the effect of double-J catheters on the patients in whom they were inserted for infected hydronephrosis is not known. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the ESWL procedure in patients with ureteral lithiasis and double-J catheters previously inserted for infected hydronephrosis.

METHOD

We conducted a comparative case-control, match-paired study in a group of patients with ureteral lithiasis treated by ESWL from January 1, 2018, to March 1, 2023, who were divided into two groups according to the presence of the double-J catheter. For each patient with the double-J catheter from the study group, we selected one patient for the control group without the double-J catheter and matched them in terms of size, location of stones, and body mass index (BMI). We analyzed the stone-free rate and complications that occurred in the two groups.

RESULTS

Forty patients with ureteral lithiasis and a double-J catheter inserted for infected hydronephrosis were enrolled in the study group. The control group included 40 patients with ureteral stones without double-J catheters. The patients in the two groups were predominantly men with stones located in the lumbar region and on the right side and with a BMI between 25 and 30 kg/m2. The stones had an average size of 0.9+/-0.12mm and 0.89+/-0.15mm, respectively (p=0.624). There was no statistically significant difference in stone-free rate between the two groups after the first session of ESWL (47.5% vs. 52.5%, p=0.502), the second (70% vs. 75%, p = 0.616), and the third session (85% vs. 87.5%, p=0.761). The rate of complications was similar in both groups (7.5% vs. 5%, p=0.761).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of double-J catheters inserted in patients with ureteral stones who underwent ESWL for infected hydronephrosis does not affect the stone-free rate of the procedure or the complication rate. The procedure of ESWL in patients with ureteral lithiasis and double-J catheters inserted for infected hydronephrosis is a safe and efficient method that can be recommended as an initial treatment alongside retrograde ureteroscopy.