Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction between Tofacitinib and Voriconazole in Rats

Drug Interaction-Informed Approaches to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a complex and chronic condition that requires the use of various pharmacological agents for its management. Despite advancements in IBD research, the multifaceted mechanisms involved continue to pose significant challenges for strategic prevention. Therefore, it is crucial to prioritize safe and effective treatment strategies using the currently available pharmacological agents. Given that patients with IBD often require multiple medications due to combination therapy or other underlying conditions, a comprehensive understanding of drug interactions is essential for optimizing treatment regimens. In this review, we examined the pharmacological treatment options recommended in the current IBD management guidelines and provided a comprehensive analysis of the known pharmacokinetic interactions associated with these medications. In particular, this review includes recent research results for the impact of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) on the concentrations of biological agents used in IBD treatment. By leveraging detailed interaction data and employing personalized dosing strategies, healthcare providers can improve therapeutic outcomes and minimize adverse effects, ultimately improving the quality of care for patients with IBD.

CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms and myricetin interaction on tofacitinib metabolism

Tofacitinib can effectively improve the clinical symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. In this current study, a recombinant human CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 system was operated to study the effects of recombinant variants on tofacitinib metabolism. Moreover, the interaction between tofacitinib and myricetin was analyzed in vitro. The levels of M9 (the main metabolite of tofacitinib) was detected by ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). The findings revealed that 11 variants showed significant changes in the levels of M9 compared to CYP3A4.1, while the other variants didn't reveal any remarkable significances. Compared with CYP2C19.1, 11 variants showed increases in the levels of M9, and 10 variants showed decreases. Additionally, it was demonstrated in vitro that the inhibition of tofacitinib by myricetin was a non-competitive type in rat liver microsomes (RLM) and human liver microsomes (HLM). However, the inhibitory mechanism was a competitive type in CYP3A4.18, and mixed type in CYP3A4.1 and .28, respectively. The data demonstrated that gene polymorphisms and myricetin had significant effects on the metabolism of tofacitinib, contributing to important clinical data for the precise use.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of antifungal therapies: do we really need it and what are the best practices?

INTRODUCTION

Despite advancements, invasive fungal infections (IFI) still carry high mortality rates, often exceeding 30%. The challenges in diagnosis, coupled with limited effective antifungal options, make managing IFIs complex. Antifungal drugs are essential for IFI management, but their efficacy can be diminished by drug-drug interactions and pharmacokinetic variability. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM), especially in the context of triazole use, has emerged as a valuable strategy to optimize antifungal therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides current evidence regarding the potential benefits of TDM in IFI management. It discusses how TDM can enhance treatment response, safety, and address altered pharmacokinetics in specific patient populations.

EXPERT OPINION

TDM plays a crucial role in achieving optimal therapeutic outcomes in IFI management, particularly for certain antifungal agents. Preclinical studies consistently show a link between therapeutic drug levels and antifungal efficacy. However, clinical research in mycology faces challenges due to patient heterogeneity and the diversity of fungal infections. TDM's potential advantages in guiding Echinocandin therapy for critically ill patients warrant further investigation. Additionally, for drugs like Posaconazole, assessing whether serum levels or alternative markers like saliva offer the best measure of efficacy is an intriguing question.