1
|
Resemini R, Geroldi C, Capotorti G, De Toni A, Parisi F, De Sanctis M, Cabai T, Rossini M, Vignali L, Poli MU, Lo Piccolo E, Mariotti B, Arcidiacono A, Biella P, Alghisi E, Bani L, Bertini M, Blasi C, Buffi F, Caprio E, Castiglione S, Digiovinazzo P, Dondina O, Fanelli G, Ferrini F, Fiorilli V, Gaiani G, Gambino D, Genre A, Lasserre B, Maltoni A, Marchetti M, Montagnani C, Ottaviano M, Panigada C, Ronchi S, Salata S, Salbitano F, Simoni E, Versace S, Pastore MC, Citterio S, Labra M, Gentili R. Building Greener Cities Together: Urban Afforestation Requires Multiple Skills to Address Social, Ecological, and Climate Challenges. PLANTS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2025; 14:404. [PMID: 39942966 PMCID: PMC11819661 DOI: 10.3390/plants14030404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2024] [Revised: 01/17/2025] [Accepted: 01/20/2025] [Indexed: 02/16/2025]
Abstract
Urban afforestation is increasingly regarded as a key strategy for fostering biodiversity to restore and enhance the ecosystem services needed to counteract the effects of climate change in built-up areas. In Italy, several experimental afforestation projects have been launched as part of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), focusing on cities or metropolitan areas such as Milan, Rome, Pistoia and Campobasso. These projects follow a multidisciplinary approach, integrating botanists, foresters, urban planners, landscape architects and remote sensing specialists. The goal is to address the challenging complexity of urban forest restoration through reforestation and afforestation actions. Key innovations include the integration of transdisciplinary methodologies (landscape analysis, landscape design, forest and plant ecology) with the application of advanced remote sensing technologies and participatory community engagement frameworks to address ecological and social challenges. Experimental plots have been set up across various urban areas, testing a range of planting schemes to maximise climate change resilience and ensure long-term ecological sustainability. Emphasis has been placed on selecting drought-tolerant and thermophilic species that are better adapted to widespread warming and local urban heat islands. 'Biodiversity strips' with perennial flowers for insects, shrubs with berries for birds and nests for wild bees and vertebrates have been set up to enhance biodiversity in new afforestation areas. Advanced monitoring tools, such as Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and multi-sensor drones, have been employed alongside field observations to assess forest growth, species survival, structural complexity and biodiversity enhancement over time. Historical analyses of landscape patterns and ecological connectivity over the past 200 years, along with evaluations of afforestation projects from the last 70 years, have provided critical insights into the successes and challenges of previous interventions, serving as a guide for future efforts. By focusing on ecological connectivity, the integration of afforested areas into the urban matrix, and citizen engagement, the current project aims to align urban forestry efforts with sustainable development goals. This comprehensive project framework addresses environmental restoration and the social and aesthetic impacts on local communities, contributing to the overall resilience and well-being of urban and peri-urban ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaello Resemini
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (M.R.); (L.V.); (L.B.); (P.D.); (O.D.); (C.M.); or (C.P.); (S.C.)
| | - Chiara Geroldi
- Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.G.); (A.D.T.); (T.C.); (M.U.P.); (A.A.); (D.G.); (S.R.); (S.S.); (M.C.P.)
| | - Giulia Capotorti
- Department of Environmental Biology, University La Sapienza of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (G.C.); (M.D.S.); (F.B.); (G.F.)
| | - Andrea De Toni
- Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.G.); (A.D.T.); (T.C.); (M.U.P.); (A.A.); (D.G.); (S.R.); (S.S.); (M.C.P.)
| | - Francesco Parisi
- Department of Biosciences and Territory, Forestry LABs, University of Molise, 86090 Pesche, Italy; (F.P.); (B.L.); (M.O.); (S.V.)
| | - Michele De Sanctis
- Department of Environmental Biology, University La Sapienza of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (G.C.); (M.D.S.); (F.B.); (G.F.)
| | - Thomas Cabai
- Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.G.); (A.D.T.); (T.C.); (M.U.P.); (A.A.); (D.G.); (S.R.); (S.S.); (M.C.P.)
| | - Micol Rossini
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (M.R.); (L.V.); (L.B.); (P.D.); (O.D.); (C.M.); or (C.P.); (S.C.)
| | - Luigi Vignali
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (M.R.); (L.V.); (L.B.); (P.D.); (O.D.); (C.M.); or (C.P.); (S.C.)
| | - Matteo Umberto Poli
- Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.G.); (A.D.T.); (T.C.); (M.U.P.); (A.A.); (D.G.); (S.R.); (S.S.); (M.C.P.)
| | - Ermes Lo Piccolo
- Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, 50144 Florence, Italy; (E.L.P.); (B.M.); (F.F.); (A.M.)
| | - Barbara Mariotti
- Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, 50144 Florence, Italy; (E.L.P.); (B.M.); (F.F.); (A.M.)
| | - Andrea Arcidiacono
- Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.G.); (A.D.T.); (T.C.); (M.U.P.); (A.A.); (D.G.); (S.R.); (S.S.); (M.C.P.)
| | - Paolo Biella
- ZooPlantLab, Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (P.B.); (M.L.)
| | - Erica Alghisi
- Ente Regionale per i Servizi all’Agricoltura e alle Foreste (ERSAF), 20124 Milan, Italy; (E.A.); (M.B.); (G.G.); (E.S.)
| | - Luciano Bani
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (M.R.); (L.V.); (L.B.); (P.D.); (O.D.); (C.M.); or (C.P.); (S.C.)
| | - Massino Bertini
- Ente Regionale per i Servizi all’Agricoltura e alle Foreste (ERSAF), 20124 Milan, Italy; (E.A.); (M.B.); (G.G.); (E.S.)
| | - Carlo Blasi
- Interuniversity Research Center “Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Sustainability” (CIRBISES), University La Sapienza of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| | - Francesca Buffi
- Department of Environmental Biology, University La Sapienza of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (G.C.); (M.D.S.); (F.B.); (G.F.)
| | - Enrico Caprio
- Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, 10123 Turin, Italy; (E.C.); (V.F.); (A.G.)
| | - Stefano Castiglione
- Department of Chemistry and Biology “A. Zambelli”, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy;
| | - Patrizia Digiovinazzo
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (M.R.); (L.V.); (L.B.); (P.D.); (O.D.); (C.M.); or (C.P.); (S.C.)
| | - Olivia Dondina
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (M.R.); (L.V.); (L.B.); (P.D.); (O.D.); (C.M.); or (C.P.); (S.C.)
| | - Giuliano Fanelli
- Department of Environmental Biology, University La Sapienza of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (G.C.); (M.D.S.); (F.B.); (G.F.)
| | - Francesco Ferrini
- Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, 50144 Florence, Italy; (E.L.P.); (B.M.); (F.F.); (A.M.)
| | - Valentina Fiorilli
- Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, 10123 Turin, Italy; (E.C.); (V.F.); (A.G.)
| | - Gianluca Gaiani
- Ente Regionale per i Servizi all’Agricoltura e alle Foreste (ERSAF), 20124 Milan, Italy; (E.A.); (M.B.); (G.G.); (E.S.)
| | - Daniela Gambino
- Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.G.); (A.D.T.); (T.C.); (M.U.P.); (A.A.); (D.G.); (S.R.); (S.S.); (M.C.P.)
| | - Andrea Genre
- Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, 10123 Turin, Italy; (E.C.); (V.F.); (A.G.)
| | - Bruno Lasserre
- Department of Biosciences and Territory, Forestry LABs, University of Molise, 86090 Pesche, Italy; (F.P.); (B.L.); (M.O.); (S.V.)
| | - Alberto Maltoni
- Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, 50144 Florence, Italy; (E.L.P.); (B.M.); (F.F.); (A.M.)
| | - Marco Marchetti
- Department of Architecture and Design, University of La Sapienza of Rome, 00196 Rome, Italy;
| | - Chiara Montagnani
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (M.R.); (L.V.); (L.B.); (P.D.); (O.D.); (C.M.); or (C.P.); (S.C.)
| | - Marco Ottaviano
- Department of Biosciences and Territory, Forestry LABs, University of Molise, 86090 Pesche, Italy; (F.P.); (B.L.); (M.O.); (S.V.)
| | - Cinzia Panigada
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (M.R.); (L.V.); (L.B.); (P.D.); (O.D.); (C.M.); or (C.P.); (S.C.)
- Rurall S.p.A.—Rural & Urban Digital Hub, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Silvia Ronchi
- Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.G.); (A.D.T.); (T.C.); (M.U.P.); (A.A.); (D.G.); (S.R.); (S.S.); (M.C.P.)
| | - Stefano Salata
- Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.G.); (A.D.T.); (T.C.); (M.U.P.); (A.A.); (D.G.); (S.R.); (S.S.); (M.C.P.)
| | - Fabio Salbitano
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy;
| | - Enrico Simoni
- Ente Regionale per i Servizi all’Agricoltura e alle Foreste (ERSAF), 20124 Milan, Italy; (E.A.); (M.B.); (G.G.); (E.S.)
| | - Soraya Versace
- Department of Biosciences and Territory, Forestry LABs, University of Molise, 86090 Pesche, Italy; (F.P.); (B.L.); (M.O.); (S.V.)
| | - Maria Chiara Pastore
- Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.G.); (A.D.T.); (T.C.); (M.U.P.); (A.A.); (D.G.); (S.R.); (S.S.); (M.C.P.)
| | - Sandra Citterio
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (M.R.); (L.V.); (L.B.); (P.D.); (O.D.); (C.M.); or (C.P.); (S.C.)
| | - Massimo Labra
- ZooPlantLab, Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (P.B.); (M.L.)
| | - Rodolfo Gentili
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (M.R.); (L.V.); (L.B.); (P.D.); (O.D.); (C.M.); or (C.P.); (S.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Montaldi A, Iamonico D, Del Vico E, Valeri S, Lasinio GJ, Capotorti G. Green infrastructure design for the containment of biological invasions. Insights from a peri-urban case study in Rome, Italy. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2024; 365:121555. [PMID: 38924891 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Secondary shrublands and transitional woodland/shrub formations are recognised to be particularly susceptible to plant invasions, one of the main global threats to biodiversity, especially in dynamic peri-urban landscapes. Urban fringes are in fact often the place for the sprawl of artificial surfaces, fragmentation of habitats, and complex land transitions (including both agriculture intensification and abandonment), which in turn increase propagule pressure of exotic species over residual semi-natural ecosystems. Within this framework, the present study was aimed at analysing i) how landscape composition and configuration affect the richness of woody exotic species in shrubland and transitional woodland/shrub patches, and ii) how this threat can be addressed by means of green infrastructure design in a peri-urban case study (Metropolitan City of Rome, Italy). Accordingly, the occurrence of exotic plants was recorded with field surveys and then integrated with landscape analyses, both at patch level and over a 250 m buffer area around each patch. Thus, the effect of landscape features on exotic plant richness was investigated with Generalised Linear Models, and the best model identified (pseudo R-square = 0.62) for inferring invasibility of shrublands throughout the study area. Finally, a Green Infrastructure (GI) to contain biological invasion was planned, based on inferred priority sites for intervention and respective, site-tailored, actions. The latter included not only the removal of invasive woody alien plants, but also reforestation and planting of native trees for containment of dispersal and subsequent establishment. Even though specifically developed for the study site, and consistent with local government needs, the proposed approach represents a pilot planning process that might be applied to other peri-urban regions for the combined containment of biological invasions and sustainable development of peripheral complex landscapes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Montaldi
- Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Environmental Biology, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
| | - Duilio Iamonico
- Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Environmental Biology, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Eva Del Vico
- Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Environmental Biology, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone Valeri
- Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Environmental Biology, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanna Jona Lasinio
- Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Statistical Sciences, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Capotorti
- Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Environmental Biology, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mollashahi H, Szymura M, Szymura TH. Connectivity assessment and prioritization of urban grasslands as a helpful tool for effective management of urban ecosystem services. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0244452. [PMID: 33370396 PMCID: PMC7769447 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Urban grasslands are usually managed as short-cut lawns and have limited biodiversity. Urban grasslands with low-intensity management are species rich and can perform numerous ecosystem services, but they are not accepted by citizens everywhere. Further, increasing and/or maintaining a relatively high level of plant species richness in an urban environment is limited by restricted plant dispersal. In this study, we examined the connectivity of urban grasslands and prioritized the grassland patches with regard to their role in connectivity in an urban landscape. We used high-resolution data from a land use system to map grassland patches in Wrocław city, Silesia, southwest Poland, Central Europe, and applied a graph theory approach to assess their connectivity and prioritization. We next constructed a model for several dispersal distance thresholds (2, 20, 44, 100, and 1000 m), reflecting plants with differing dispersal potential. Our results revealed low connectivity of urban grassland patches, especially for plants with low dispersal ability (2–20 m). The priority of patches was correlated with their area for all dispersal distance thresholds. Most of the large patches important to overall connectivity were located in urban peripheries, while in the city center, connectivity was more restricted and grassland area per capita was the lowest. The presence of a river created a corridor, allowing plants to migrate along watercourse, but it also created a barrier dividing the system. The results suggest that increasing the plant species richness in urban grasslands in the city center requires seed addition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassanali Mollashahi
- Institute of Agroecology and Plant Production, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
- * E-mail:
| | - Magdalena Szymura
- Institute of Agroecology and Plant Production, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Tomasz H. Szymura
- Department of Ecology, Biogeochemistry and Environmental Protection, University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Davies HJ, Doick KJ, Hudson MD, Schreckenberg K. Challenges for tree officers to enhance the provision of regulating ecosystem services from urban forests. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2017; 156:97-107. [PMID: 28342350 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2016] [Revised: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 03/15/2017] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Urbanisation and a changing climate are leading to more frequent and severe flood, heat and air pollution episodes in Britain's cities. Interest in nature-based solutions to these urban problems is growing, with urban forests potentially able to provide a range of regulating ecosystem services such as stormwater attenuation, heat amelioration and air purification. The extent to which these benefits are realized is largely dependent on urban forest management objectives, the availability of funding, and the understanding of ecosystem service concepts within local governments, the primary delivery agents of urban forests. This study aims to establish the extent to which British local authorities actively manage their urban forests for regulating ecosystem services, and identify which resources local authorities most need in order to enhance provision of ecosystem services by Britain's urban forests. Interviews were carried out with staff responsible for tree management decisions in fifteen major local authorities from across Britain, selected on the basis of their urban nature and high population density. Local authorities have a reactive approach to urban forest management, driven by human health and safety concerns and complaints about tree disservices. There is relatively little focus on ensuring provision of regulating ecosystem services, despite awareness by tree officers of the key role that urban forests can play in alleviating chronic air pollution, flood risk and urban heat anomalies. However, this is expected to become a greater focus in future provided that existing constraints - lack of understanding of ecosystem services amongst key stakeholders, limited political support, funding constraints - can be overcome. Our findings suggest that the adoption of a proactive urban forest strategy, underpinned by quantified and valued urban forest-based ecosystem services provision data, and innovative private sector funding mechanisms, can facilitate a change to a proactive, ecosystem services approach to urban forest management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen J Davies
- Centre for Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, University Road, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
| | - Kieron J Doick
- Urban Forest Research Group, Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, Surrey GU10 4LH, United Kingdom.
| | - Malcolm D Hudson
- Centre for Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, University Road, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
| | - Kate Schreckenberg
- Centre for Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, University Road, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|