Oncofertility in Canada: an overview of Canadian practice and suggested action plan

Twenty-year oncology sperm banking experience at a Canadian academic fertility centre: a retrospective study examining the usage and reproductive outcomes from oncology patients

BACKGROUND

Many cancer treatments pose a threat to fertility for patients. Semen cryopreservation before cancer treatment is an effective method to preserve fertility. There are sparse long-term data on the usage of samples from Canadian oncology sperm banks.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all oncology sperm banking samples at a Canadian academic fertility centre from 2001 to 2020 was conducted.

RESULTS

From 2001 to 2020, 4521 samples were banked by 2504 patients. The most frequent diagnoses among these patients were testicular cancer (29.5%) and lymphoma (26.9%). Of these patients, only 81 (3.2%) patients returned to use their samples with intrauterine insemination (IUI) or in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment and 62 (2.5%) patients transferred their samples to another clinic. The time between banking and return for usage of the sperm ranged from 1 to 131 months with a median of 18 months after banking. A total of 66 IVF cycles (104 embryo transfers) and 101 IUI cycles from 67 patients were reviewed. Of the 67 couples who used their samples, 53.7% achieved a clinical pregnancy. The clinical pregnancy rate was 6.6% per cycle for IUI and 30.8% per embryo transfer for IVF. Higher sperm concentration or total motile count was not associated with a higher chance of pregnancy. Patients who conceived had on average 1.9 ± 0.8 (p=0.02) more usable embryos per cycle than those who did not conceive.

CONCLUSIONS

Sperm cryopreservation provides a valuable option for patients with cancer to achieve parenthood after potentially gonadotoxic cancer treatment. However, the overall usage of banked oncology sperm samples is very low.

Fertility preservation in patients undergoing gonadotoxic treatments: a Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society clinical practice guideline

The management of young patients with cancer presents several unique challenges. In general, these patients are ill prepared for the diagnosis and the impact on their fertility. With the improved survival for all tumour types and stages, the need for adequate fertility counselling and a multidisciplinary approach in the reproductive care of these patients is paramount. Recent advances in cryopreservation techniques allow for the banking of spermatozoa, oocytes, embryos and ovarian tissue without compromising survival. This Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society (CFAS) guideline outlines the current understanding of social and medical issues associated with oncofertility, and the medical and surgical technologies available to optimize future fertility.

Gaps in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Education in Oncology Fellowship Training

Purpose: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs, 15-39 years) with cancer experience disparities in care and outcomes compared with older/younger patients. AYAs receive care from medical and pediatric oncologists, however, little is known about the extent of training fellows receive. This needs assessment evaluating current AYA oncology (AYA-O) education in pediatric and medical oncology fellowship programs to identify knowledge gaps for curricular development. Methods: An anonymous, cross-sectional, web-based survey developed by pediatric and medical oncologists was sent to medical (n = 178) and pediatric (n = 119) hematology/oncology program directors (PDs) at 251 sites in the United States. PDs were asked to participate and distribute the survey to their fellows. Survey questions addressed current AYA curriculum, provider comfort, and priorities for future AYA educational content. Results: Participants from 69/251 programs responded (program response rate = 27%), including 51 PDs (32 pediatric, 19 medical oncology) and 58 fellows (33 pediatric, 25 medical oncology). Eighty-five percent of PDs (44/51) reported lacking formal AYA curricula. Of these, 80% (35/44) offer some topic-specific lectures, while 20% (9/44) provide little/no education for any topics. For nearly all topics, at least 45% of combined respondents reported little/no education. Respondents believe AYA topics are important for inclusion in future curricula. The most important topics for inclusion reported were oncofertility (82%), survivorship (78%), and communication (77%). Conclusions: There are large and actionable gaps in AYA-O education during fellowship training. Efforts are underway to develop AYA-O curriculum to provide both medical and pediatric oncology fellows with the knowledge and skills required to provide optimal AYA care.

"Queer Insights": Considerations and Challenges for Assessing Sex, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation in Oncofertility Research

This article addresses issues related to clinical and research approaches to oncofertility for adolescent and young adult (AYA) sexual and gender minority (SGM) cancer patients. Limited attention has been dedicated to understanding the extent to which oncofertility services are appropriately and equitably delivered to AYAs with diverse orientations toward sexual orientation, gender identity, and future family. Unresolved challenges to conducting research with this vulnerable population perpetuate a lack of adequate knowledge about SGM AYA oncofertility needs. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to inform considerations of sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation for investigations that include SGM AYAs. In order to improve the knowledge base and clinical services for this population, we discuss (1) challenges to sampling this population; (2) categorization and survey logic (e.g., skip patterns) in light of fluid sexual orientation and gender identities; and (3) clinical implications of accurately assessing sex and gender for oncofertility research and practice. We also recommend strategies for producing inclusive and accurate assessments of sexual and gender identity categories in both research and clinical encounters with SGM AYAs. Incorporating "queer insights" into empirical research - that is, positioning queer theory at the center of oncofertility study design - is suggested as a future direction for oncofertility research and practice.

Barriers to Oncofertility Care among Female Adolescent Cancer Patients in Canada

High survival rates in adolescent cancer patients have shifted the medical focus to the long-term outcomes of cancer treatments. Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation increase the risk of infertility and infertility-related distress in adolescent cancer patients and survivors. The aims of this narrative review were to (1) describe the psychosocial impacts of cancer-related infertility in adolescents, (2) identify multilevel barriers to fertility preservation (FP) conversations and referrals, and (3) conclude with evidence-based clinical solutions for improving the oncofertility support available to Canadian adolescents. The results of this review revealed that FP decisions occur within the patient, parent, and health care provider (HCP) triad, and are influenced by factors such as parent attitudes, patient maturity, and HCP knowledge. Decision tools and HCP education can promote the occurrence of developmentally appropriate fertility discussions. At the systems level, cost and resource barriers prevent patients from receiving sufficient fertility information and referrals. Clinical models of care (MOCs) can define interdisciplinary roles and referral pathways to improve the integration of oncofertility services into adolescent cancer care. The continued integration of oncofertility care will ensure that all Canadian adolescents receive the exemplary medical and psychological support necessary to make empowered decisions about their own fertility.

Outcomes and Challenges of Reproductive Health in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Survivors

Long-term therapy-related reproductive health side effects impact the quality of life of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) survivors. In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of gonadal dysfunction (GD) pre- and post-HSCT, analyzed factors associated with GD, and explored rates of fertility assessment (FA) and fertility preservation (FP) in a resource-limited setting. FA and outcomes of patients age ≤45 years undergoing HSCT between June 2000 and May 2018 were collected retrospectively. We included 213 patients with a median age of 26 years. Pre-HSCT FA was performed in 71.8%, with a GD rate of 17%. The rate of GD was not different between the sexes (females, 19.5% versus males, 16.1%; P = .616) and was only associated with increasing age. The rate of cryopreservation in the cohort was 3.3%. Almost one-half (47.7%) of post-HSCT patients completed FA and evidenced an increase in GD rate to 48.9%. Comparing pre-HSCT and post-HSCT GD rates, women had a significant increase (19.5% versus 81.4%; P < .001), whereas men did not (16.1% versus 20.4%; P = .76). These results were confirmed by a multiple imputation analysis accounting for missing data. Female sex, pre-HSCT cytotoxic therapy, myeloablative conditioning, and germ cell tumor (GCT) diagnosis were associated with post-HSCT GD. Reproductive health preservation can be positively impacted when FA and FP are prioritized at the initial diagnosis in HSCT candidates, particularly in women of older age and men with a diagnosis of GCT. The low FP success observed urges implementation of strategies that favor accessibility and improve quality of life of HSCT survivors in low- and middle-income countries.

System Performance Indicators for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Care and Control: A Scoping Review

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer represent a unique group with unmet needs. Metrics and quality indicators are important for evaluating AYA cancer care. The purpose of this study is to describe the quality indicators in a Canadian context that are used for AYA (15-39 years of age) cancer care and control. The Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework was applied to undertake a scoping review of the peer-reviewed and gray literature for indicators related to AYA cancer care and control. OVID Medline was searched from January 1995 until April 2018 for English language articles. Inquiries were made to AYA cancer organizations and a Google search conducted to identify unpublished material. Articles were included if they incorporated AYAs and contained cancer care indicators. Data were summarized at the article and indicator level. A total of 610 abstracts were reviewed. Eighty-nine full-text articles and reports were assessed for eligibility, with 19 included in analyses which identified 146 indicators or indicator concepts. Most of the indicators were specific to the AYA age group (65.8%) and dealt with the active care theme (57.5%), almost half focusing on guideline adherence and treatment (26.4%) and multidisciplinary/specialized care (20.7%). Notable deficits in indicators were in fertility, psychosocial care, and prevention. Important progress has been made internationally and within Canada on developing indicators for AYA cancer care and control. However, there is a lack of well-defined AYA-specific cancer care indicators developed through a consensus process.

Development of System Performance Indicators for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Care and Control in Canada

OBJECTIVES

To develop an expert-group, consensus-based list of system performance indicators to be used for monitoring, evaluating, and benchmarking progress for cancer care and control in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) in Canada.

METHODS

A national multidisciplinary panel of AYA oncology experts was convened; they prepared a literature review and undertook a brainstorming exercise to create a comprehensive list of indicators based on a previously defined framework for AYA cancer care and control in Canada. A modified Delphi process was then undertaken to cull the list based on 3 quick screen criteria. Three rounds of ranking were required. The fourth stage employed a face-to-face meeting, and the final stage utilized a survey to rank the indicators on the basis of importance and feasibility.

RESULTS

Nineteen participants contributed to the 5-stage process. From an initial list of 114 indicators, 14 were ultimately endorsed, representing 5 themes: active care, survivorship, psychosocial issues, palliative care, and research. The 5 highest ranked indicators were assessed as very to moderately feasible, with only a single indicator (clinical trial enrollment) in the top 5 assigned a least feasible ranking.

CONCLUSION

The 14 indicators provide a starting point for the development of a standard set of metrics for AYA cancer care and control in Canada and have potential for international utility.

The "Begin Exploring Fertility Options, Risks and Expectations" (BEFORE) decision aid: development and alpha testing of a fertility tool for premenopausal breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Premenopausal breast cancer patients are at risk of treatment-related infertility. Many patients do not receive sufficient fertility information before treatment. As such, our team developed and alpha tested the Begin Exploring Fertility Options, Risks, and Expectations decision aid (BEFORE DA).

METHODS

The BEFORE DA development process was guided by the International Patient Decision Aids Standards and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Our team used integrated knowledge translation by collaborating with multiple stakeholders throughout the development process including breast cancer survivors, multi-disciplinary health care providers (HCPs), advocates, and cancer organization representatives. Based on previously conducted literature reviews and a needs assessment by our team - we developed a paper prototype. The paper prototype was finalized at an engagement meeting with stakeholders and created into a graphically designed paper and mirrored online decision aid. Alpha testing was conducted with new and previously engaged stakeholders through a questionnaire, telephone interviews, or focus group. Iterative reviews followed each step in the development process to ensure a wide range of stakeholder input.

RESULTS

Our team developed an 18-page paper prototype containing information deemed valuable by stakeholders for fertility decision-making. The engagement meeting brought together 28 stakeholders to finalize the prototype. Alpha testing of the paper and online BEFORE DA occurred with 17 participants. Participants found the BEFORE DA usable, acceptable, and most provided enthusiastic support for its use with premenopausal breast cancer patients facing a fertility decision. Participants also identified areas for improvement including clarifying content/messages and modifying the design/photos. The final BEFORE DA is a 32-page paper and mirrored online decision aid ( https://fertilityaid.rethinkbreastcancer.com ). The BEFORE DA includes information on fertility, fertility options before/after treatment, values clarification, question list, next steps, glossary and reference list, and tailored information on the cost of fertility preservation and additional resources by geographic location.

CONCLUSION

The BEFORE DA, designed in collaboration with stakeholders, is a new tool for premenopausal breast cancer patients and HCPs to assist with fertility discussions and decision-making. The BEFORE DA helps to fill the information gap as it is a tool that HCPs can refer patients to for supplementary information surrounding fertility.

A Practical Guide to Gynecologic and Reproductive Health in Women Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

Optimum care of female transplant recipients requires gynecologic care at several stages through the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) process. Sex-based considerations in women post-HCT span gynecologic sequelae of transplant along with assessment and maintenance of optimal sexual and gynecologic health. Pre-HCT, managing menstruation and abnormal uterine or genital bleeding, considering fertility preservation, and assessing for sexually transmitted infections, including human papillomavirus (HPV)-related disease and cervical cancer, enhance women's health. While inpatient during transplant when women are thrombocytopenic, menstrual bleeding requires suppression. Whenever graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is assessed, screening for genital GVHD merits consideration. After the first 100 days, periodic assessments include obtaining a menstrual history, assessing ovarian function, and reviewing current hormonal use and contraindications to hormonal methods. Regular assessment for primary ovarian insufficiency, dyspareunia, and intimacy guides provision of contraception and hormone replacement options. As part of ongoing screening for genital GVHD and HPV-related disease, including sexually transmitted infections, periodic pelvic examinations are performed. Once successful long-term survival is achieved, planning for fertility may be considered. This article offers a comprehensive approach to these aspects of gynecologic care of patients throughout the trajectory of HCT and beyond into survivorship. We review the effects of HCT treatment on sexual health, ovarian function, and resulting menstrual changes and fertility challenges. Identification, treatment, and prevention of subsequent malignancies, including breast cancer, are discussed, with a focus on regular assessment of genital HPV disease and GVHD in long-term follow-up.

Oncofertility Decision Support Resources for Women of Reproductive Age: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Cancer treatments have the potential to cause infertility among women of reproductive age. Many cancer patients do not receive sufficient oncofertility information or referrals to reproductive specialists prior to starting cancer treatment. While health care providers cite lack of awareness on the available oncofertility resources, the majority of cancer patients use the internet as a resource to find additional information to supplement discussions with their providers.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to identify and characterize Web-based oncofertility decision aids and health education materials accessible for women of reproductive age with a diagnosis of any cancer.

METHODS

We searched five databases and the gray literature for the years 1994-2018. The developer and content information for identified resources was extracted. Each resource underwent a quality assessment.

RESULTS

We identified 31 open access resources including 4 decision aids and 27 health educational materials. The most common fertility preservation options listed in the resources included embryo (31/31, 100%), egg (31, 100%), and ovarian tissue freezing (30, 97%). Notably, approximately one-third (11, 35%) contained references and 5 (16%) had a reading level of grade 8 or below. Resources were of varying quality; two decision aids from Australia and the Netherlands, two booklets from Australia and the United Kingdom, and three websites from Canada and the United States rated as the highest quality.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive review characterizes numerous resources available to support patients and providers with oncofertility information, counseling, and decision making. More focus is required to improve the awareness and the access of existing resources among patients and providers. Providers can address patient information needs by leveraging or adapting existing resources to support clinical discussions and their specific patient population.

An evaluation of oncofertility decision support resources among breast cancer patients and health care providers

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients of reproductive age are at risk of infertility as a result of their treatment. Oncofertility decision support resources can assist patients with fertility decision-making before treatment yet available oncofertility resources contain varying levels of detail and different fertility options. The key information/sections needed in oncofertility resources remain unclear. To explore the information needs for oncofertility decision-making before cancer treatment, we aimed to evaluate existing oncofertility decision support resources with breast cancer patients and providers.

METHODS

We conducted 30 to 90-min interviews that included a survey questionnaire and open-ended questions with patients and providers between March and June 2016. Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Analysis involved descriptive statistics for survey responses and thematic analysis of qualitative data.

RESULTS

A total of 16 participants completed interviews. Key information perceived by most participants as necessary for fertility decision-making included tailored post-treatment pregnancy rates, cost ranges and financial assistance for the fertility options based on patients' situation. However, patient and provider participants expressed differing opinions on the inclusion of all before and after treatment fertility options and the amount of fertility information required at diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

The evaluation identified fertility information needs among patients in addition to providers' views on patient needs. While existing oncofertility resources contain information perceived as necessary for decision-making there is an opportunity to use these findings to create or enhance resources to better meet the needs of patients. Additionally, patients and providers differing views on information needs highlight the opportunity for provider training to ensure better communication using resources in clinic to understand specific patient needs.

Patterns of Referral for Fertility Preservation Among Female Adolescents and Young Adults with Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study

Purpose: To assess the fertility preservation (FP) referral rates and patterns of newly diagnosed breast cancer in female adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients.

Methods: Women aged 15–39 years with newly diagnosed breast cancer in Ontario from 2000 to 2017 were identified using the Ontario Cancer Registry. Exclusion criteria included prior sterilizing procedure, health insurance ineligibility, and prior infertility or cancer diagnosis. Women with a gynecology consult between cancer diagnosis and chemotherapy commencement with the billed infertility diagnostic code (ICD-9 628) were used as a surrogate for FP referral. The effect of age, parity, year of cancer diagnosis, staging, income, region, neighborhood marginalization, and rurality on referral status was investigated.

Results: A total of 4452 patients aged 15–39 with newly diagnosed breast cancer met the inclusion criteria. Of these women, 178 (4.0%) were referred to a gynecologist with a billing code of infertility between cancer diagnosis and initiation of chemotherapy. Older patients, prior parity, and advanced disease were inversely correlated with referrals. Referral rates also varied regionally: patients treated in the south-east and south-west Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) had the highest probability of referral, and patients covered by north LHINs had the lowest (central LHIN as reference). General surgeons accounted for 36.5% of all referrals, the highest percentage of all specialists. Referral rates significantly increased over time from 0.4% in 2000 to 10.7% in 2016.

Conclusion: FP referral rates remain low and continue to be influenced by patient demographics and prognosis. These findings highlight the need for further interdisciplinary coordination in addressing the fertility concerns of AYA with newly diagnosed breast cancers.

Adolescent Males' Understanding of Infertility as a Long-Term Effect of Cancer Therapy

Cancer therapy can result in infertility in childhood cancer survivors; however, little is known about how young adolescent males make sense of infertility and potential future parenthood. What's more, research shows that many healthcare professionals in Canada do not discuss fertility preservation (FP) with this vulnerable population. This study examines how male adolescent childhood cancer survivors understand infertility as a long-term effect of cancer treatments. We used a narrative analysis to examine 16 interviews with 14-18-year-old males. The findings from this research illustrate that FP discussions may raise meaningful questions for young men about how they see themselves and construct their identities. The findings also demonstrate that young men's beliefs about FP may be informed by family narratives, and it shows that biological parenthood may be important to adolescent males.

A fertility needs assessment survey of male cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To describe fertility-related informational needs and practices, and to examine if demographic characteristics are related to these needs and practices.

METHODS

A needs assessment survey was conducted at three Canadian cancer centres.

RESULTS

192 male cancer patients (Mage = 33.6) completed the survey. Most patients (70%) recalled having had a discussion with a health care provider regarding their fertility and 44% banked their sperm. Patients reported not getting all the information that they wanted, eg, the risk that a future child may have the same type of cancer (78%), and what was covered by insurance plans (71%). Barriers to sperm preservation were urgency to begin cancer treatment (49%), not planning to have a child in the future (47%) and worries that cancer could be passed on to future children (38%). Participants' age and being the parent of a child were significantly associated with having had a discussion about fertility. Participants' age, province, being the parent of a child and the desire for future children were significantly associated with fertility preservation.

CONCLUSIONS

Discussions with health care providers were more frequent, and fertility preservation rates were higher than in past studies, but still not all patients' questions were answered. Misconceptions about passing on cancer to one's child, and that sperm preservation will delay treatment, should be dispelled. Health care providers can ask patients if they have any desire to have children in the future as a way to initiate a discussion of fertility preservation. Key information gaps and psychosocial resource needs are suggested to fully meet male cancer patients' fertility-related concerns.

Fertility preservation healthcare circuit and networks in cancer patients worldwide: what are the issues?

Background

Fertility preservation (FP) is a major determinant of quality of life after cancer remission for women who may not have achieved their ideal family size. This article describes the FP services and strategy currently available, highlighting issues of oncofertility worldwide.

Main body of the abstract

For these patients in complex situations, health networks are essential to improve coordination of care, and the strengthening of this coordination is a major challenge to improve the performance of the health system. Two international networks have been created in order to foster scientific exchange between countries and to standardize the oncofertility healthcare circuit. However, the paucity of referral nationwide networks lead to a structural gap in health care policies.

Short conclusion

Management strategies of oncofertility in the world are still fragile and uneven. To structure the oncofertility sector, a multidisciplinary project allowing teams to collaborate is of utmost importance particularly in low and middle-income countries.

Listening through narratives: using a narrative approach when discussing fertility preservation options with young cancer patients

Despite clinical practice guideline recommendations mandating that fertility preservation be discussed with young cancer patients, many providers fail to initiate such discussions with adolescents. Researchers and clinicians often focus on system-level changes to improve access to fertility preservation for adolescents and young adults in Canada. However, little of the available information considers the way in which health care providers approach those discussions. Research has shown that, even when fertility preservation options are broached with adolescents, survivors often report dissatisfaction with those conversations, thus raising additional concerns about their content and quality. Here, we consider how a narrative approach-and the Frank narrative typology in particular-could improve the quality of such conversations by helping providers to more accurately and thoughtfully respond to the needs of adolescent patients when discussing the possibility of fertility preservation. Based on findings from a qualitative research project, we provide concrete suggestions for how to more sensitively approach fertility preservation conversations with male adolescent cancer patients and survivors.

A survey on fertility management in young women of reproductive age treated with chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Treatment-related infertility is an important issue for cancer survivors of reproductive age. We aimed to determine the understanding and management of fertility issues in cancer survivors by health care providers.

METHODS

We studied 112 patients aged 15-40 years who underwent chemotherapy in Tokushima University Hospital. The gynecologists and oncologists who treated these patients were surveyed regarding their concerns about infertility issues in young cancer survivors.

RESULTS

Of the 112 women studied, 57 had iatrogenic amenorrhea. Five were referred to reproductive specialists before or during treatment. Three patients with breast cancer were referred after treatment; they could not undergo fertility treatment due to ovarian failure after chemotherapy. Forty-five medical doctors answered the survey: 21 gynecologists (including 9 fertility specialists), 13 oncologists, and 11 surgeons. Of the oncologists and surgeons, 37.5 % (9/24) referred their patients to fertility experts. They listed certain issues regarding the patients: (1) anxiety that the intervention will alter the prognosis by delaying cancer treatment, and (2) a lack of communication between the oncologist and the fertility specialist. Almost all physicians agreed that fertility counseling was needed before chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

This report showed the importance of oncofertility counseling and cooperation between oncologists and fertility specialists. Fertility in cancer survivors depends on type of cancer treatment applied, chemotherapy regimen, and age at treatment. Our institute is now equipped for oncofertility counseling and refers patients for fertility preservation prior to cancer treatment.

Systematic review of available guidelines on fertility preservation of young patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Since the survival rate of breast cancer patients has improved, harmful effects of new treatment modalities on fertility of the young breast cancer patients has become a focus of attention. This study aimed to systematically review and critically appraise all available guidelines for fertility preservation in young breast cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Major citation databases were searched for treatment guidelines. Experts from relevant disciplines appraised the available guidelines. The AGREE II Instrument that includes 23 criteria in seven domains (scope and purpose of the guidelines, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity, applicability, editorial independence, and overall quality) was used to apprise and score the guidelines.

RESULTS

The search strategy retrieved 2,606 citations; 72 were considered for full-text screening and seven guidelines were included in the study. There was variability in the scores assigned to different domains among the guidelines. ASCO (2013), with an overall score of 68.0%, had the highest score, and St Gallen, with an overall score of 24.7%, had the lowest scores among the guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

With the promising survival rate among breast cancer patients, more attention should be given to include specific fertility preservation recommendations for young breast cancer patients.

Fertility preservation in reproductive-age women facing gonadotoxic treatments

BACKGROUND

Advancements in the treatments for cancer and autoimmune and other hematologic conditions continue to improve survival and cure rates. Despite those changes, various gonadotoxic agents and other treatments can still compromise the future fertility of many women. Progress in medical and surgical reproductive technologies has helped to offset the reproductive consequences of the use of gonadotoxic therapies, and allows for future fertility and normal pregnancy.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed to outline the pathophysiology of gonadotoxicity from various treatments. The success of fertility preservation, fertility sparing, and cryopreservation options are reviewed. Barriers and facilitators to referral and oncofertility treatment in Canada are also outlined.

RESULTS

According to the quality of the evidence, recommendations are made for fertility assessment, patient referral, cryopreservation, and other assisted reproductive technologies.

CONCLUSIONS

To ensure ongoing fertility in women undergoing gonadotoxic treatments, assisted reproductive technologies can be combined with a multidisciplinary approach to patient assessment and referral.