Efficacy of metronomic vinorelbine in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and poor performance status

Efficacy and safety of metronomic oral vinorelbine and its combination therapy as second- and later-line regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse reactions of metronomic oral vinorelbine and its combination therapy as second- and later-line regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

NSCLC patients undergoing metronomic oral vinorelbine as second- and later-line regimens in Fujian Cancer Hospital from October 2018 to October 2022 were enrolled, and patients' demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. The efficacy and safety of metronomic oral vinorelbine monotherapy and its combination therapy regimens were compared.

RESULTS

Of 57 study subjects, 63.2% received third- and later-line therapy, with median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 4 months, overall response rate (ORR) of 10.5%, and disease control rate (DCR) of 80.7%. The incidence of therapy-related adverse events was 42.1%, and there was only one case presenting grades 3 and 4 adverse events (1.8%). Among driver gene-negative participants, vinorelbine combination therapy regimens achieved longer mPFS (4.6 vs. 1.2 months, hazards ratio = 0.11, P < 0.0001) and comparable toxicity in relative to metronomic oral vinorelbine, and metronomic oral vinorelbine combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors showed the highest response, with mPFS of 5.6 months (95% CI 4.8 to 6.4 months), ORR of 25%, and DCR of 81.3%. Among participants with gradual resistance to osimertinib, continuing osimertinib in combination with metronomic oral vinorelbine achieved mPFS of 6.3 months (95% CI 0.1 to 12.5 months) and DCR of 86.7%.

CONCLUSION

Metronomic oral vinorelbine and its combination therapy regimens are favorable options as second- and later-line therapy for advanced NSCLC patients, with acceptable efficacy and tolerable toxicity. Vinorelbine combination therapy regimens show higher efficacy and comparable toxicity in relative to metronomic oral vinorelbine, and metronomic oral vinorelbine may have a synergistic effect with immunotherapy and EGFR-TKI targeted therapy.

Revisiting metronomic vinorelbine with mathematical modelling: a Phase I trial in lung cancer

BACKGROUND

A phase Ia/Ib trial of metronomic oral vinorelbine (MOV) driven by a mathematical model was performed in heavily pretreated metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer or Pleural Mesothelioma patients. Disease Control Rate, progression free survival, toxicity and PK/PD were the main endpoints.

METHODS

Best MOV scheduling was selected using a simplified phenomenological, semi-mechanistic model with a total weekly dose of 150-mg vinorelbine. Computation of individual PK parameters was performed using population approach.

RESULTS

The mathematical model proposed the following metronomic schedule for a 150-mg weekly dose of vinorelbine: 60 mg D1, 30 mg D2, 60 mg D4. A total of 37 heavily pre-treated patients (30 evaluable) were enrolled. Grade III/IV neutropenia was observed in 30% patients. Median PFS was 11 weeks. Disease Control Rate was 73% (i.e.; 13% partial response and 60% stable disease). A large variability in drug exposure (AUC_0-24 h: 53%) and PK parameters (Cl: 83%) were observed among patients. Simulated trough levels after D2 and D4 showed similarly 56-73% variability among patients. Drug exposure was not associated with efficacy, but neutropenia was more frequent in patients with AUC > 250 ng/ml.h. Tumor burden, performance status and neutrophils-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were associated with PFS, suggesting that MOV would be indicated in selected patients. We built a composite score to predict efficacy, mixing baseline tumor size and NLR showing 84% selectivity and 75% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

MOV was characterized by important variability in drug exposure among patients. However, and despite being all heavily pre-treated, 73% of disease control rate and 11 weeks PFS were achieved with manageable toxicities. PK/PD relationships yielded conflicting results depending on the initial tumor burden and BSA, suggesting that patients should be carefully selected prior to be scheduled for metronomic regimen. Possible role NLR could play as a predictive marker suggests immunomodulating features with MOV.

Metronomic oral vinorelbine in previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients unfit for platinum-based chemotherapy: results of the randomized phase II Tempo Lung trial

Background

To assess the efficacy and safety of a metronomic schedule of oral vinorelbine (mVNR) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients unfit for platinum-based combination chemotherapy.

Patients and methods

This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label phase II study in treatment-naive patients with TNM stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Patients received mVNR at a fixed dose of 50 mg × 3 or standard schedule 60-80 mg/m² weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) without grade 4 toxicity (G4PFS; NCI-CTC v4). Main secondary objectives were safety, disease control rate (DCR) without grade 4 toxicity (G4DCR), DCR, PFS, overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL).

Results

A total of 167 patients were included, 83 and 84 patients in the mVNR and standard arms, respectively. The median G4PFS was 4.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.6-4.3] and 2.2 months (95% CI: 1.5-2.9), hazard ration (HR) = 0.63 (95% CI: 0.45-0.88), P = 0.0068 in favor of metronomic arm; G4DCR was 45.8% and 26.8% in the mVNR and standard arms, respectively. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were less frequent in the mVNR arm (25.3% versus 54.4%) mainly owing to a reduction in all grades (15.7% versus 51.9%) and grade 3-4 neutropenia (10.8% versus 42%). PFS was 4.3 (95% CI: 3.3-5.1) and 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.8-5.2) in mVNR and standard arms, respectively. No difference in median OS was observed. QoL was comparable between arms.

Conclusions

Metronomic oral vinorelbine significantly prolonged median G4PFS in advanced NSCLC patients unfit for platinum combinations as first-line treatment. It was associated with a clear reduction in toxicity and may be considered as an important option in this challenging population.

•

First-line oral vinorelbine prolonged PFS without grade 4 toxicity in platinum-unfit patients with advanced NSCLC.

•

Metronomic oral vinorelbine is associated with a clear reduction of grade 3-4 toxicities (mainly hematological ones).

•

Metronomic oral vinorelbine allows home treatment and easy tailoring of the treatment according to patient tolerance.

Metronomic therapy in advanced breast cancer and NSCLC: vinorelbine as a paradigm of recent progress

INTRODUCTION

Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) is based on frequent dosing of the drug. . This leads to pharmacologically active but low plasma concentrations that reduce toxicity. MCT seems to work primarily via indirect effects on tumor cells and their microenvironment, rather than direct antitumor effects. Oral vinorelbine is one of the most widely studied MCT approaches in both advanced breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

MCT with vinorelbine has proven efficacy, tolerability and quality of life benefits both as monotherapy and in combination with other MCTs or targeted agents, in first-line therapy and in previously treated patients. Key populations are emerging who may be particularly well suited to metronomic vinorelbine, including those with indolent disease, older individuals, and those with multiple comorbidities and/or bone metastases. Ongoing trials should help to further delineate these target groups. Additional work is needed to better understand the optimal vinorelbine regimen, particularly when used in combination or in non-Caucasian patients. Markers are also required to help identify individuals who are most likely to respond. Nonetheless, the efficacy and tolerability of MCT, allied to improved patient convenience, reduced need for medical engagement and lower cost, make it an appealing option - particular in resource-constrained healthcare environments.

De-escalating cancer treatments during COVID 19 pandemic: Is metronomic chemotherapy a reasonable option?

•

COVID 19 pandemic represents an emergency for public health services.

•

The reorganization of the healthcare system has had an important impact on the management of cancer patients.

•

Oral treatments and de-escalation strategies are encouraged.

•

Oral metronomic chemotherapy could be a reasonable treatment option in some cancer patients subgroups during COVID 19 pandemic.

COVID 19 pandemic represents an emergency for public health services and containment measures to reduce the risk of infection have been promptly activated worldwide.

The healthcare systems reorganization has had a major impact on the management of cancer patients who are considered at high risk of infection.

Recommendations and guidelines on how to manage cancer patients during COVID 19 pandemic have been published. Oral administration of chemotherapy is recommended to limit the access of cancer patients to hospital facilities and in some cases to guarantee the continuum of care.

Low-dose metronomic administration of chemotherapy with different drugs and schedules has emerged in the last years as a possible alternative to conventional chemotherapy, due to its promising tumor control rates and excellent safety profiles. Moreover, given that many metronomic schedules use the oral route administration, it could represent a therapeutic strategy to ensure continuum of cancer care during COVID 19 pandemic.

In this review we have selected all the clinical studies that have used the metronomic strategy, especially with oral drugs, in order to identify the subgroups of cancer patients who can benefit most from a metronomic approach even during COVID 19 pandemic.

Metronomic oral vinorelbine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer progressing after nivolumab immunotherapy: a retrospective analysis

Purpose:

The availability of immune checkpoint inhibitors has deeply changed the therapeutic scenario of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Up until now, chemotherapy still represents the first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC not harbouring genetic mutations or lacking high expression of programmed death ligand even if the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy has recently been shown to improve clinical outcome. We carried out a multi-institutional retrospective analysis on third-line chemotherapy with metronomic oral vinorelbine (VNR) in a series of patients with metastatic NSCLC pre-treated with first-line chemotherapy and second-line immunotherapy.

Patients and methods:

Thirty patients with metastatic NSCLC with progressive disease after first-line chemotherapy and subsequent immunotherapy were treated with metronomic oral VNR continuously at the fixed dose of 30 mg three times per week.

Results:

A partial response was achieved in 4 patients (13.3%), while 10 patients (33.3%) displayed disease stabilisation for an overall disease control rate of 46.7%. Median progression-free survival was 3.9 months (range 1–13 months) and median OS reached 8.1 months (range 4.0–24.0+ months) with a 12-month survival rate of 22%.

Conclusion:

Oral metronomic VNR appears to be active and safe in patients with metastatic NSCLC in progression after first-line chemotherapy and second-line immunotherapy. The results reported, although from a limited sample, may suggest its use for long-term stabilisation of the disease with good patient compliance.

Metronomic chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) is defined as the rhythmic chemotherapy of low-dose cytotoxic drugs with short or no drug-free breaks over prolonged periods. MCT affects tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment. Particularly, the low-dose schedule impairs the repair process of endothelial cells, resulting in an anti-angiogenesis effect. By stimulating the immune system to eliminate tumor cells, MCT induces immunological activation. Furthermore, combined with targeted therapy, anti-angiogenic drugs enhance the efficacy of MCT. The present review is an overview of phase I, II and III clinical trials focusing on the efficacy, toxicity and mechanism of MCT in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Furthermore, the prospects of MCT in NSCLC have been discussed. The present review indicated that MCT is an efficacious treatment for selected patients with NSCLC, with acceptable systemic side effects and economic viability for public health.

Metronomic Oral Vinorelbine: An Alternative Schedule in Elderly and Patients PS2 With Local/Advanced and Metastatic NSCLC Not Oncogene-addicted

BACKGROUND

The MILES and ELVIS studies showed that vinorelbine is one of the best options for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell-lung cancer (NSCLC). Oral vinorelbine at standard schedule (60-80 mg/m²/weekly) has good activity in terms of response rates and progression-free survival. In recent years, a metronomic schedule of oral vinorelbine (40-50 mg/m² three times a week, continuously) has been studied in phase II trials, especially in unfit and elderly patients. In the MOVE trial metronomic oral vinorelbine had a clinical benefit [partial response (PR)+stable disease (SD) >12 weeks] in 58.1% of patients with mild toxicity. On this basis, in 2017 we started a phase II study with metronomic oral vinorelbine in elderly (over 70 years) or unfit [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (ECOG-PS) of 2] patients with locally/advanced and metastatic NSCLC. Primary aims were clinical benefit (PR+SD ≥6 months) and toxicity; secondary aims were progression-free survival and overall survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 25 patients entered the study: 11 with local/advanced and 14 with metastatic NSCLC (five squamous and 20 adenocarcinoma). None of the patients had epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocation, or programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1) expression; those with squamous carcinoma did not have PDL1 expression. The median age was 79 (range=44-90) years. The PS was 0 in 12 patients (48%), 1 in four patients (16%) and 2 in nine patients (36%). Oral vinorelbine was administered at 40 mg three times a week continuously.

RESULTS

Clinical benefit was achieved in eight patients (32%). Objective responses were partial response in two patients (8%), stable disease in seven (28%), progressive disease in nine (36%); seven patients were not evaluable for response (28%). Median progression-free survival was 2 months; median overall survival was 4 months but four out of eight patients with clinical benefit were still alive at 18 months. Overall survival at 1 year was 32%. Toxicity was mild: only one patient experienced grade 4 neutropenia, one grade 3 peripheral neuropathy, four grade 2 asthenia, one grade 2 mucositis, and one grade 2 diarrhoea. The dose needed to be reduced to 30 mg/m²/three times a week in three patients.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed the activity and safety of metronomic oral vinorelbine in patients with wild-type local/advanced and metastatic NSCLC unsuitable for treatment with standard i.v. chemotherapy, allowing patients a comfortable home-based therapy, thereby avoiding frequent hospital visits.

A Phase I Comparative Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Two Intravenous Formulations of Vinorelbine in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety between two vinorelbine formulations [a new oil-in-water emulsion formulation (ANX) versus a previously marketed solution formulation (Navelbine)] in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Method: This was a single-center, randomized, open-label study. Eligible patients aged 18–70 years who had histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC were enrolled. In cycle 1, the patients alternatively received the two formulations (30 mg/m², given as a 10-min infusion) with a 7-day interval. Samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were taken during cycle 1. For all subsequent 21-day cycles (maximum four cycles), ANX was administered on days 1 and day 8. Bioequivalence analysis was performed on C_max, AUC_last, and AUC_inf. The safety profiles and anti-tumor effects were also determined.

Results: From March 2013 to January 2015, 24 patients were enrolled and 20 were eligible for pharmacokinetic evaluation. The 20 subjects in the pharmacokinetic analysis set had a median age of 61 years (range, 37–70 years), and 15 patients were male (75%). Mean vinorelbine C_max values for ANX and Navelbine were 1,317.40 and 1,446.30 ng/mL, respectively. Corresponding AUC_last values were 797.08 and 924.26 ng·h/mL, respectively. AUC_inf values were 830.14 and 957.16 ng·h/mL, respectively. Treatment ratios of the geometric means were 90.00% (90% CI, 83.22–99.07%) for C_max, 86.92% (90% CI, 80.91–93.37%) for AUC_last, and 87.44% (90% CI, 82.08–93.16%) for AUC_inf. These results met the required 80–125% bioequivalence criteria. The most frequently reported adverse events after vinorelbine administration were neutropenia, leucopenia, neutropenic fever, and constipation.

Conclusion: At therapeutic dosage levels, pharmacokinetic behavior and safety profiles were similar for both formulations. Chinese National Registry Code: ChiCTR-IPR-15005856.

Metronomic Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Clinical Experience

Metronomic chemotherapy, continuous and dose-dense administration of chemotherapeutic drugs with lowered doses, is being evaluated for substituting, augmenting, or appending conventional maximum tolerated dose regimens, with preclinical and clinical studies for the past few decades. To date, the principle mechanisms of its action include impeding tumoral angiogenesis and modulation of hosts' immune system, affecting directly tumor cells, their progenitors, and neighboring stromal cells. Its better toxicity profile, lower cost, and easier use are main advantages over conventional therapies. The evidence of metronomic chemotherapy for personalized medicine is growing, starting with unfit elderly patients and also for palliative treatment. The literature reviewed in this article mainly demonstrates that metronomic chemotherapy is advantageous for selected patients and for certain types of malignancies, which make it a promising therapeutic approach for filling in the gaps. More clinical studies are needed to establish a solidified role for metronomic chemotherapy with other treatment models in modern cancer management.

Circulating immune biomarkers as predictors of the response to pembrolizumab and weekly low dose carboplatin and paclitaxel in NSCLC and poor PS: An interim analysis

The combination of standard-dose chemotherapy and immunotherapy has been shown to be beneficial for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with good performance status (PS). However, treatment options for patients with poor PS are limited. In the present study, the feasibility and immunological effects of low-dose chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel combined with immunotherapy with pembrolizumab were examined in patients with metastatic NSCLC and a poor PS. Patients with advanced NSCLC and a PS of 2 were randomized to single-agent pembrolizumab at 200 mg every 3 weeks or pembrolizumab combined with weekly carboplatin area under the curve 1 and paclitaxel 25 mg/m². Blood for circulating immune cell phenotyping, soluble program death ligand 1 (sPD-L1) and immune-modulatory microRNAs (miRNAs) was collected prior to treatment and at weeks 4 and 7. Ten patients were randomized to the combination arm and 10 to the single-agent arm. Therapy was well tolerated. Four patients discontinued carboplatin due to hypersensitivity reactions but continued pembrolizumab and paclitaxel treatments. Increases in activated CD4⁺ T cells and in immune-regulatory miRNA, and decreases in myeloid derived suppressor cells were observed in the blood of patients in the combination arm and not in the single-agent arm. Changes in circulating regulatory T cells and sPD-L1 were not observed. Seven patients in the combination arm manifested a partial response compared with only two in the single-agent arm. Weekly low-dose chemotherapy carboplatin and paclitaxel was well tolerated and immunologically active when combined with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced NSCLC and a PS of 2. This combination merits further study in this patient population.

Metronomic oral vinorelbine for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter international retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

Metronomic oral vinorelbine (MOV) could be a treatment option for unfit patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on its safety profile and high patient compliance.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data on 270 patients [median age 76 (range 48-92) years, M/F 204/66, PS 0 (27)/1 (110)/≥ 2 (133), median of 3 serious comorbidities] with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC treated with MOV as first (T1) (67%), second (T2) (19%) or subsequent (T3) (14%) line. Schedules consisted of vinorelbine 50 mg (138), 40 mg (68) or 30 mg (64) three times a week continuously.

RESULTS

Patients received an overall median of 6 (range 1-25) cycles with a total of 1253 cycles delivered. The overall response rate was 17.8% with 46 partial and 2 complete responses and 119 patients (44.1%) experienced stable disease > 12 weeks with an overall disease control rate of 61.9%. Median overall time to progression was 5 (range 1-21) months [T1 7 (1-21), T2 5.5 (1-19) and T3 4 (1-19) months] and median overall survival 9 (range 1-36) months [T1 10 (1-31), T2 8 (1-36) and T3 6.5 (2-29) months]. Treatment was extremely well tolerated with 2% (25/1253) G3/4 toxicity (mainly G3 fatigue and anemia) and no toxic deaths. We observed the longer OS 14 (range 7-36) months in a subset of squamous NSCLC patients receiving immunotherapy after metronomic oral vinorelbine.

CONCLUSION

We confirmed MOV as an extremely safe treatment in a large real world population of advanced NSCLC with an interesting activity mainly consisting of long-term disease stabilization. We speculate the possibility of a synergistic effect with subsequent immunotherapy.

Metronomic vinorelbine is directly active on Non Small Cell Lung Cancer cells and sensitizes the EGFRL858R/T790M cells to reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Metronomic vinorelbine (mVNR) has been described primarily as an antiangiogenic therapy, and no direct effects of mVNR on Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) cells has yet been demonstrated. The aims of this study were i) to establish the direct activity of mVNR on NSCLC cells either EGFR wt or EGFR^L858R/T790M, and ii) to quantify the synergism of the combination with reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), investigating the underlying mechanism of action. Proliferation assays were performed on A-549 (wt EGFR^high), H-292 (EGFR-wt), H-358 (EGFR-wt), H-1975 (EGFR^L858R/T790M) NSCLC cell lines exposed to mVNR, its active metabolite deacetyl-VNR (D-VNR), gefitinib and erlotinib for 144 h treatments. The synergism between mVNR and EGFR TKIs was determined by the combination index (CI) in EGFR-wt and H-1975 NSCLC cells. Cyclin-D1 and ABCG2 genes expression and protein levels were measured by RT-PCR and ELISA assays, as well as the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and Akt. Intracellular concentrations of EGFR TKIs and VNR were investigated with a mass spectrometry system. mVNR, and its active metabolite D-VNR, were extremely active on NSCLC cells, in particular on H-1975 (IC₅₀ = 13.56 ± 2.77 pM), resistant to TKIs. mVNR inhibited the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and Akt and significantly decreased the expression of both cyclin-D1 and ABCG2 m-RNA and protein. The simultaneous combination of VNR and reversible EGFR TKIs showed a strong synergism on EGFR-wt NSCLC cells and on H-1975 cells (e.g. CI = 0.501 for 50% of affected cells), increasing the intracellular concentrations of EGFR TKIs (e.g. +50.5% vs. gefitinib alone). In conclusions, mVNR has direct effects on NSCLC cells and sensitizes resistant cells to EGFR TKIs, increasing their intracellular concentrations.

Complex epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and their responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in previously untreated advanced lung adenocarcinomas

BACKGROUND

Two or more different epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations can be detected within a single tumor sample, which represents complex mutations. However, the frequency and efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatments for patients harboring these mutations are unknown.

METHODS

From January 2011 to January 2017, patients diagnosed with EGFR mutations were screened. The effectiveness of TKIs in patients with complex mutations was retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 16,840 subjects were screened, and there were 5898 positive patients. One hundred eighty-seven patients (3.2% of all patients with EGFR mutations) had complex EGFR mutations, and 51 of the patients with advanced adenocarcinoma were treated with TKIs as a first-line treatment. The objective response rates for patients who had Del-19+21L858R mutations (n = 15), Del-19/21L858R+atypical mutations (n = 16), double atypical mutations (n = 8), and complex mutations with a primary drug-resistant pattern (n = 12) were 75.0%, 60.0%, 71.0%, and 8.3%, respectively. The median progression-free survival times for the 4 groups were 18.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6-25.9 months), 9.7 months (95% CI, 3.3-15.8 months), 9.6 months (95% CI, 3.3-19.0 months), and 1.4 months (95% CI, 0.4-2.3 months), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These results from the largest sample size suggest that EGFR-TKI therapy is effective in patients with Del-19+21L858R mutations, Del-19/21L858R+atypical mutations, and double atypical mutations but is less effective in patients with a primary drug-resistant pattern. Patients with the Del-19+21L858R mutations may, therefore, benefit more from treatment with first-generation TKIs. Cancer 2018;124:2399-406. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Vinorelbine Potently Induces Placental Cell Death, Does Not Harm Fertility and is a Potential Treatment for Ectopic Pregnancy

Ectopic pregnancies complicate 1–2 pregnancies and are a leading cause of maternal death. An effective oral drug therapy that replaces surgery might make its treatment safer, cheaper, simpler and therefore more widely accessible. The only current medical treatment offered to women is intramuscular methotrexate, but this only reliably resolves smaller ectopic pregnancies. As such, many ectopic pregnancies require surgical excision. We show that vinorelbine, an orally available chemotherapeutic agent, potently induced placental cell death but did not harm fertility in mice. Vinorelbine was 100–1000 times more potent than methotrexate in inducing placental cell death in vitro, and more potent than combination methotrexate and gefitinib (another proposed treatment for ectopic pregnancy being evaluated in phase III trials). Mechanistically, it caused microtubule condensation, blocked mitosis and activated the apoptosis cascade in placental cells. Vinorelbine was more efficacious than methotrexate ± gefitinib in reducing the volume of placental cell tumors xenografted subcutaneously in SCID mice. Mice exposed to vinorelbine and allowed to breed, following a four week washout period, displayed normal fertility, however long-term fertility was not assessed. Human Fallopian tubes treated with vinorelbine did not exhibit up-regulation of apoptosis molecules. Our findings show that placental cells appear sensitive to vinorelbine and it has potential as a tablet-only approach to treat ectopic pregnancy.

•

We have identified vinorelbine, a well tolerated chemotherapeutic, as a potential therapeutic for ectopic pregnancy.

•

Vinorelbine potently reduced placental cell viability in-vitro and in-vivo and proved more efficacious than the current medical therapeutic.

•

Vinorelbine did not impact upon subsequent fertility in a mouse breeding model.

Ectopic pregnancy occurs when a conceptus implants outside of the womb. They are life threating and are a leading cause of maternal death in early pregnancy. Currently, the large majority of ectopic pregnancies are removed surgical, partly owing to the limited efficacy of the only available medical therapeutic, methotrexate. Here, we have identified a potential new medical therapeutic for ectopic pregnancy, vinorelbine. Vinorelbine, which is orally available chemotherapeutic, reduced placental cell viability both in-vitro and in-vivo and did not impact upon mice fertility in a breeding model. As such, vinorelbine may be an efficacious treatment for ectopic pregnancy and further human studies into its application are warranted.