Evidence-based practice use of incretin-based therapy in the natural history of diabetes

The Time Is Right for a New Classification System for Diabetes: Rationale and Implications of the β-Cell-Centric Classification Schema

The current classification system presents challenges to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), in part due to its conflicting and confounding definitions of type 1 DM, type 2 DM, and latent autoimmune diabetes of adults (LADA). The current schema also lacks a foundation that readily incorporates advances in our understanding of the disease and its treatment. For appropriate and coherent therapy, we propose an alternate classification system. The β-cell-centric classification of DM is a new approach that obviates the inherent and unintended confusions of the current system. The β-cell-centric model presupposes that all DM originates from a final common denominator-the abnormal pancreatic β-cell. It recognizes that interactions between genetically predisposed β-cells with a number of factors, including insulin resistance (IR), susceptibility to environmental influences, and immune dysregulation/inflammation, lead to the range of hyperglycemic phenotypes within the spectrum of DM. Individually or in concert, and often self-perpetuating, these factors contribute to β-cell stress, dysfunction, or loss through at least 11 distinct pathways. Available, yet underutilized, treatments provide rational choices for personalized therapies that target the individual mediating pathways of hyperglycemia at work in any given patient, without the risk of drug-related hypoglycemia or weight gain or imposing further burden on the β-cells. This article issues an urgent call for the review of the current DM classification system toward the consensus on a new, more useful system.

A discrete-choice experiment to quantify patient preferences for frequency of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist injections in the treatment of type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Understanding patients' preferences for attributes of injectable antihyperglycemic regimens may improve patient satisfaction and medication adherence. Our objective was to quantify the preferences of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) for reducing the frequency of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist injections from once daily to once weekly.

METHODS

A total of 643 respondents with a self-reported physician diagnosis of type 2 diabetes completed a web-based discrete-choice experiment survey. The sample included four prespecified subgroups: currently using exenatide once weekly (n = 150), liraglutide once daily (n = 153), insulin (but not exenatide once weekly or liraglutide) (n = 156), and no injectable treatment (n = 184). Device attributes included type of injection device, needle size and pain, injection frequency, refrigeration, and injection-site reactions. Random-parameters logit was used to estimate the relative impact of device attributes on treatment choice for each subgroup.

RESULTS

In all subgroups, changing injection frequency from daily to weekly (independent of the effect of injection frequency on preferences for other attributes) was the most important predictor of treatment choice. Switching from a longer and thicker needle to a shorter and thinner needle and eliminating injection-site reactions were also statistically significant predictors of device choice (P < 0.05). Exenatide once weekly users and those not currently using injections were more likely to choose a treatment with characteristics similar to exenatide once weekly.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment attribute most important to patients choosing among hypothetical injectable treatments for T2DM was injection frequency: patients preferred weekly over daily injections.

LIMITATIONS

The primary limitations of this study are that it included only a limited number of attributes that may not reflect the full complexity of patient choices, diagnosis was self-reported, and patients were recruited from an Internet panel and may not be representative of the T2DM patient population.

Minimizing Hypoglycemia and Weight Gain with Intensive Glucose Control: Potential Benefits of a New Combination Therapy (IDegLira)

Due to the progressive nature of type 2 diabetes (T2D), the majority of patients require increasing levels of therapy to achieve and maintain good glycemic control. At present, once patients become uncontrolled on oral antidiabetic therapies, the two primary treatment options are glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) or basal insulin, although earlier use of GLP-1RAs has also been advocated. While both of these drug classes have proven efficacy in treating T2D, there can be limitations to their use in some patients, and resistance to further treatment intensification among both patients and physicians. More recently, treatment incorporating both a GLP-1RA and a basal insulin has been used successfully in the clinic and the first such combination product, IDegLira (insulin degludec + liraglutide), has recently been approved for use in Europe. IDegLira combines insulin degludec and the GLP-1RA liraglutide in a single injection. In both insulin-naïve and basal insulin-treated individuals with T2D, IDegLira has demonstrated greater reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) than either of the individual components, with a low rate of hypoglycemia and weight loss. IDegLira may provide a new option for patients requiring treatment intensification but for whom increased weight or a higher risk of hypoglycemia are barriers. This article discusses the rationale behind combining these two drug classes and reviews the available clinical evidence for the efficacy and safety of IDegLira.

Revisiting weight reduction and management in the diabetic patient: Novel therapies provide new strategies

Weight gain has been so synonymous with diabetes care that overweight/obesity is considered an intractable aspect of diabetes and its management. A healthy body mass index (BMI) is paramount, however, in preserving the cardiometabolic profile, slowing the course of the disease and extending the life expectancy of patients. It is also key to fostering a healthy and productive society at large. Two trends in care press us to challenge our assumptions about weight control in this population by reconsidering traditional approaches to the management of diabetes. First, new anti-diabetes drug classes have emerged that are more "weight-friendly" than previously available treatments and "gentler" on the faltering β cell. Second, novel anti-obesity agents are proving efficacious in patients with diabetes. This paper presents the composite of newer and older anti-obesity and anti-diabetic drugs. It makes recommendations for anti-diabetic regimens and processes of care that engender weight loss, or neutralize or minimize weight gain, while getting many patients to their glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) goal. Anti-obesity agents that can be safely and effectively incorporated into these regimens for the patient needing supplemental support are reviewed in detail.

THE RATIONALE FOR USE OF INCRETINS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NEW ONSET DIABETES AFTER TRANSPLANTATION (NODAT)

OBJECTIVE

Owing to advances in transplant science, increasing numbers of patients are receiving solid organ transplantation. New onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) frequently develops in transplant patients and requires acute and often ongoing management of hyperglycemia. The metabolic derangements of NODAT are similar to those of classic type 2 diabetes, and treatment has typically followed diabetes standards of care. Best practices for NODAT management remain to be developed.

METHODS

The mechanistic suitability of incretins to treat NODAT pathogenesis has been hitherto underappreciated. This review details the specific mechanistic value of incretins in patients with immunosuppression-associated hyperglycemia.

RESULTS

Corticosteroids have long been known to exert their effects on glucose metabolism by decreasing glucose utilization and enhancing hepatic gluconeogenesis. Corticosteroids also significantly and directly reduce insulin secretion, as do calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), another commonly used group of immunosuppressive drugs that cause hyperglycemia and NODAT. The ability of incretins to counteract immunosuppressant-induced disruptions in insulin secretion suggest that the insulinotropic, glucagonostatic, and glucose-lowering actions of incretins are well suited to treat immunosuppressant-induced hyperglycemia in NODAT. Additional benefits of incretins include decreased glucagon levels and improved insulin resistance. In the case of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, weight loss is another benefit, countering the weight gain that is a common consequence of both hyperglycemia and transplantation. These benefits make incretins very attractive and deserving of more investigation.

CONCLUSION

Among diabetes treatment options, incretin therapies uniquely counteract immunosuppressant drugs' interference with insulin secretion. We propose an incretin-based treatment paradigm for NODAT management.