Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor as a Therapeutic Target for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer

DNA damage response pathways and cell cycle checkpoints in colorectal cancer: current concepts and future perspectives for targeted treatment

Although several drugs have been designed in the last few years to target specific key pathways and functions in colorectal cancer (CRC), the backbone of CRC treatment is still made up of compounds which rely on DNA damage to accomplish their role. DNA damage response (DDR) and checkpoint pathways are intertwined signaling networks that arrest cell cycle, recognize and repair genetic mistakes which arise during DNA replication and transcription, as well as through the exposure to chemical and physical agents that interact with nucleic acids. The good but highly variable activity of DNA damaging agents in the treatment of CRC suggests that intrinsic alterations in DDR pathways and cell cycle checkpoints may contribute differentially to the way cancer cells react to DNA damage. In the present review, our aim is to depict the recent advances in understanding the molecular basis of the activity of DNA damaging agents used for the treatment of CRC. We focus on the known and potential drug targets that are part of these complex and intertwined pathways. We describe the potential role of the checkpoints in CRC, and how their pharmacological manipulation could lead to chemopotentiation or synergism with currently used drugs. Novel therapeutic agents playing a role in DDR and checkpoint inhibition are assessed. We discuss the possible rationale for combining PARP inhibition with DNA damaging agents, and we address the link between DDR and EGFR pathways in CRC.

PET and MRI of metastatic peritoneal and pulmonary colorectal cancer in mice with human epidermal growth factor receptor 1-targeted 89Zr-labeled panitumumab

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 1 (HER1) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. Panitumumab is an anti-HER1 monoclonal antibody approved for use in colorectal cancer. However, few data exist regarding HER1 status in the corresponding distant metastases, and little corresponding information is available regarding the localization of panitumumab at primary and metastatic lesions. The utility of PET and MRI using (89)Zr-panitumumab to assess the status of HER1 in distant metastases with different metastasis models is presented in this study.

METHODS

In vivo biodistribution and PET studies were performed in HER1-expressing LS-174T and HER1-negative A375 tumor xenografts. Additionally, studies were performed in different models of intraperitoneal and pulmonary metastases. MRI studies were performed for metastatic models to characterize the targeting potential of (89)Zr-panitumumab at different lesion sites.

RESULTS

HER1-mediated targeting was achieved in all HER1-expressing models. The LS-174T tumor area under the curve (AUC) was 3.7-fold greater than the AUC for A375. The LS-174T tumor AUC of 204.13 ± 9.67 was significantly greater (P < 0.001) than the LS-174T tumor AUC of 36.45 ± 1.39 obtained from mice coinjected with 0.1 mg of panitumumab for blocking the target. Differences were observed in 2 intraperitoneal models; tumor uptake in mice with a 3-d tumor burden was more than 2-fold greater than the mice with a 7-d tumor burden. PET and MRI studies revealed HER1-mediated tumor targeting in all metastatic models. However, significant differences were observed between different LS-174T tumor models. Peak tumor uptake of approximately 40 percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) was observed at 3-4 d after injection for the subcutaneous tumor model, in contrast to approximately 75 %ID/g at 2 d after injection for the thoracic tumors and approximately 95 %ID/g at 1-2 d after injection for the intraperitoneal tumors.

CONCLUSION

The potential utility of (89)Zr-panitumumab in assessing HER1 status in distant metastases and understanding the variations in antibody uptake at different lesion sites is demonstrated in this study. (89)Zr-panitumumab can play a vital role in patient stratification and immunotherapy and therefore warrants further investigation for clinical translation.

Prognostic vs predictive molecular biomarkers in colorectal cancer: is KRAS and BRAF wild type status required for anti-EGFR therapy?

An important molecular target for metastatic CRC treatment is the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Many potential biomarkers predictive of response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab and panitumumab) have been retrospectively evaluated, including EGFR activation markers and EGFR ligands activation markers. With regard to the "negative predictive factors" responsible for primary or intrinsic resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies a lot of data are now available. Among these, KRAS mutations have emerged as a major predictor of resistance to panitumumab or cetuximab in the clinical setting and several studies of patients receiving first and subsequent lines of treatment have shown that those with tumors carrying KRAS mutations do not respond to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies or show any survival benefit from such treatments. The role of B-RAF mutations, mutually exclusive with KRAS mutations, in predicting resistance to anti-EGFR mAbs is not yet consolidated. It therefore appears that BRAF mutations may play a strong negative prognostic role and only a slight role in resistance to anti-EGFR Abs.

Molecular mechanism underlying the synergistic interaction between trifluorothymidine and the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib in human colorectal cancer cell lines

The pyrimidine trifluorothymidine (TFT) inhibits thymidylate synthase (TS) and can be incorporated into the DNA. TFT, as part of TAS-102, is clinically evaluated in phase II studies as an oral chemotherapeutic agent. Erlotinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that is often deregulated in colorectal cancer. This study investigated molecular mechanisms underlying the cytotoxic actions of the combination of an EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor with TFT in colorectal cancer cells Caco2, WiDR, Lovo92, and Colo320. Drug interactions were examined by the sulforhodamine B assay and subsequent combination index (CI) analyses, cell cycle effects by FACS analysis of propidium iodide stained cells, Akt, MAPK and EGFR phosphorylation and expression levels by Western blotting and TS activity by the TS in situ assay. All combination schedules were synergistic in wt-EGFR expressing (but with mutated downstream pathways) WiDR and Lovo92 (CI 0.4-0.8) and very synergistic in Caco2 cells (with wt-EGFR and functional downstream pathways; CI 0.1-0.3), but in EGFR-lacking Colo320 cells, no additional activity was found (CI 1.0-1.2). Synergism was mostly related to the induction of cell cycle arrest and an erlotinib-mediated inhibition of the pro-survival signaling through Akt and MAPK that was activated (phosphorylated) by TFT. Erlotinib inhibited TS activity in EGFR-expressing cell lines, probably due to cell cycle arrest in the G(1) phase. TS activity was slightly lower in the combinations, probably due to cell cycle interference. Taken together, the combination of erlotinib with TFT seems to present a potential strategy in the field of molecular therapeutics.

Rapamycin synergizes with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib in non-small-cell lung, pancreatic, colon, and breast tumors

The receptor for epidermal growth factor (EGFR) is overexpressed in many cancers. One important signaling pathway regulated by EGFR is the phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase (PI3K)-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1-Akt pathway. Activation of Akt leads to the stimulation of antiapoptotic pathways, promoting cell survival. Akt also regulates the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-S6K-S6 pathway to control cell growth in response to growth factors and nutrients. Recent reports have shown that the sensitivity of non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines to EGFR inhibitors such as erlotinib (Tarceva, OSI Pharmaceuticals) is dependent on inhibition of the phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1-Akt-mTOR pathway. There can be multiple inputs to this pathway as activity can be regulated by other receptors or upstream mutations. Therefore, inhibiting EGFR alone may not be sufficient for substantial inhibition of all tumor cells, highlighting the need for multipoint intervention. Herein, we sought to determine if rapamycin, an inhibitor of mTOR, could enhance erlotinib sensitivity for cell lines derived from a variety of tissue types (non-small-cell lung, pancreatic, colon, and breast). Erlotinib could inhibit extracellular signal-regulated kinase, Akt, and S6 only in cell lines that were the most sensitive. Rapamycin could fully inhibit S6 in all cell lines, but this was accompanied by activation of Akt phosphorylation. However, combination with erlotinib could down-modulate rapamycin-stimulated Akt activity. Therefore, in select cell lines, inhibition of both S6 and Akt was achieved only with the combination of erlotinib and rapamycin. This produced a synergistic effect on cell growth inhibition, observations that extended in vivo using xenograft models. These results suggest that combining rapamycin with erlotinib might be clinically useful to enhance response to erlotinib.

Phase 1b Dose Escalation Study of Erlotinib in Combination with Infusional 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

Erlotinib (Tarceva) is a potent epidermal growth factor receptor (HER1) inhibitor. Infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) is a standard therapy for colorectal cancer. This trial assessed the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of erlotinib combined with FOLFOX.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with advanced solid tumors were sequentially enrolled into three cohorts (cohort 1: 100 mg/d erlotinib, 65 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin, 200 mg/m(2) leucovorin, 400 mg/m(2) bolus 5-FU, and 400 mg/m(2) continuous infusion 5-FU; cohort 2: oxaliplatin increased to 85 mg/m(2) and 5-FU infusion increased to 600 mg/m(2); and cohort 3: erlotinib increased to 150 mg/d).

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled (23 with colorectal cancer): no dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed in cohort 1. In cohort 2, two of nine patients experienced a DLT (both diarrhea). In cohort 3, two of nine patients had a DLT (diarrhea and staphylococcal septicemia). Cohort 3 determined the MTD cohort and expanded to 17 patients in total. The most common adverse events were diarrhea, nausea, stomatitis, and rash (primarily mild/moderate). No pharmacokinetics interactions were observed. One patient (colorectal cancer) had a complete response, seven patients had a partial response, and nine had stable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD was defined as follows: 150 mg/d erlotinib, 85 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin; 200 mg/m(2) leucovorin, 400 mg/m(2) bolus 5-FU, and 600 mg/m(2) infusion 5-FU. At the MTD, the combination was well tolerated and showed antitumor activity, warranting further investigation in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and other solid tumors.

Mutant p53 protein in the serum of patients with colorectal cancer: Correlation with the level of carcinoembryonic antigen and serum epidermal growth factor receptor

INTRODUCTION

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used for analysis of serum mutant p53 protein, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Serum samples were obtained from 48 patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and a control group of twenty healthy individuals.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated a significant increase of serum mutant p53, EGFR, and CEA levels in CRC patients compared to the control group (P<0.001 for each). Mutant p53 protein was significantly different in the different CRC grades (P=0.028). p53, CEA, and EGFR can differentiate successfully between different CRC grades and normal control (P<0.001 for each). Sensitivities of p53, CEA, and EGFR were 39.6, 31, and 71%, respectively. There was no correlation between CEA, EGFR, and p53 indicating that these variables were independent. Positive status of serum CEA and (or) p53 was found in 29 out of 48 (60%) patients. Also, positive status of serum CEA and (or) EGFR was found in 39 out of 48 (81%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Thus, the simultaneous determination of p53 or EGFR combined with the CEA may increase the sensitivity to diagnose CRC patients and may aid in disease prognosis.

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) Levels Before and After Chemotherapy: A Study in Rectal Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Induction of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) by inflammatory mediators, oncogenes, and carcinogens has been demonstrated in preclinical models. However, there are limited clinical data regarding COX-2 induction by chemotherapy or radiation. Experimental data suggest cross-talk between the EGFR and COX-2 pathways. The aim of this study was to analyze the expression of COX-2 before and after chemoradiation (CRT) and correlate the same with tumor (T) down-staging and survival. Similar data were obtained for EGFR expression before and after chemoradiation.

METHODS

Archival paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from patients undergoing CRT between 1995 and 2001 were analyzed. COX-2 expression was measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC), using the 160112 COX-2 mouse monoclonal antibody. For EGFR, we used mouse monoclonal Ab-10. Standard immunoperoxidase technique was used to detect the avidin- biotin peroxidase complex. Staining in tumor tissue was visually scored and confirmed by an image analyzer (ACIS; ChromaVision Medical Systems, Inc, San Juan Capistrano, CA).

RESULTS

Twenty pretreatment biopsy samples from rectal cancer patients and their paired, post-CRT surgical specimens (n = 17) were analyzed. Three cases had no primary tumor after CRT. COX-2 expression was noted in 19 of 20 pretreatment samples and 17 of 17 surgical specimens. EGFR expression was noted in 10 cases pretreatment. Six patients with weakly positive COX-2 expression pretreatment had increased COX-2 expression after CRT, whereas in 1 patient the expression decreased after CRT. No EGFR induction was noted. There was no statistical association between EGFR and COX-2 expression in this data set. Median survival for the entire cohort was 38.9 months. There was no difference in survival between the COX-2 induced and noninduced groups.

CONCLUSIONS

COX-2 induction was seen with CRT in this population of rectal cancer patients. Prognostic significance of this induction remains to be defined in a larger cohort.

Molekulare Therapie in der Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie

During recent years, molecular techniques have significantly impacted our understanding and therapeutic concepts in gastrointestinal and liver disease. In a number of diseases, diagnostic work-up includes molecular data that supplements the phenotypical evaluation. This includes monogenic diseases as well as the identification of genetic risk factors (e. g. NOD2/CARD15 mutation in Crohn's disease) and viral disease. Attempts to replace liver transplantation in hereditary liver disease by targeted molecular interventions (e. g. via viral vectors) are still experimental, but the associated techniques have improved considerably. The molecular identification of therapeutic targets was followed by the development of specifically tailored therapeutics. These agents are mainly used in the treatment of chronic inflammatory bowel disease and gastrointestinal tumors.

Recent developments in cancer chemotherapy oriented towards new targets

Malignant diseases are one of the major causes of death in the western world. Patients are treated by surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. Chemotherapeutic treatment is used to decrease the tumour burden and to eliminate malignant cells. However, in most cases, resistance against chemotherapy develops. Therefore, there is a permanent need for new additional treatment strategies and chemotherapeutic combination regimens. In the present review article, the authors try to highlight the most promising approaches and summarise a selection of potential targets and compounds which might become alternative treatment options against malignant diseases. Due to the high number of scientific articles and the rapid developments in the area of cancer research, the authors can only mention a few selected targets and treatment options; however, the review focuses on new and notably important targets and compounds.