Pegylated interferon-α2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C in a real-life setting: the Hepatys French cohort (2003–2007)

Effectiveness of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus infection in hepatitis C/HIV coinfected individuals: A multicenter study

In a hepatitis C virus (HCV)/HIV-positive Brazilian cohort, evaluate the safety and efficacy of HCV DAAs, the frequency of resistance substitutions in the HCV NS5A and NS5B genes and identify predictors of treatment failure.Retrospective multicenter study of HCV/HIV patients treated with sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens at 10 reference centers in Brazil.Clinical and virological data were collected. Genetic diversity in the NS5A and NS5B genes was assessed by direct nucleotide sequencing. The primary outcome was sustained virological response (SVR) 12 weeks after DAA completion.Of 643 HCV/HIV patients analyzed, 74.7% were male, median CD4+ T cell count was 617 cells/mm, 90% had an undetectable HIV viral load. HCV genotype 1 was detected in 80.2%, and 60% were taking at least 1 medication other than antiretroviral drugs during their DAA therapy. Cirrhosis was present in 42%. An SOF/daclatasvir (DCV) regimen was used in most patients (98%). The frequency of NS5A polymorphisms associated with clinically relevant resistance to DCV was 2%; no relevant NS5B variants were identified. The SVR12 rate was 92.8% in an intention to treat (ITT) analysis and 96% in a modified ITT (m-ITT) analysis. AE occurred in 1.6% of patients. By multivariate analysis, therapeutic failure was associated, in the m-ITT analysis, with concomitant use of anticonvulsant drugs (P = .001), age (P = .04), and female gender (P = .04).SOF/DCV regimens were associated with a high SVR rate in an HCV/HIV population. The use of concurrent anticonvulsant drugs and DAAs decreases the chances of achieving an SVR.

Technetium-99 m-PEGylated dendrimer-G2-(Dabcyle-Lys6,Phe7)-pHBSP: A novel Nano-Radiotracer for molecular and early detecting of cardiac ischemic region

In cardiac ischemic disorder, pyroglutamate helix B surface peptide (pHBSP) which derived from erythropoietin causes to increase cell stability. To improve the serum stability of pHBSP, two lipophilic amino acids Arg⁶, Ala⁷ were replaced with Fmoc-(Dabcyle)-Lys-OH and Fmoc-Phe-OH during the peptide synthesis. This peptide was subsequently conjugated to PEGylated dendrimer-G₂ and labeled with ^99mTcO₄^- to detect cardiac ischemic region. Radiochemical purity (RCP) of ^99mTc-PEGylated dendrimer-G₂-(Dabcyle-Lys⁶,Phe⁷)-pHBSP was evaluated by ITLC method. In addition, the radiopeptide was investigated for stability in human serum and binding affinity to hypoxic cells in myocardium H9c2 cell lines. Biodistribution and SPECT/CT scintigraphy were assessed in cardiac ischemic rats. Radiochemical yield indicated that the anionic dendrimer has a very high potential to complex formation with ^99mTcO^-₄ (RCP > 94%) which was stable in human serum with RCP 89% up to 6 h. The binding of ^99mTc- nanoconjugate to hypoxic cells was significantly more than normoxic cells (3-fold higher compared to normoxic cells at 1 h). In biodistribution studies, erythropoietin receptor-Beta common receptor (EPO-BcR)-positive uptake in the cardiac ischemic region was 3.62 ± 0.44% ID/g 30 min post injection. SPECT imaging showed a prominent uptake of ^99mTc-nanoconjugate in EPO-BcR expressing ischemic heart.

Sofosbuvir-based regimens in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection: Real-world efficacy in Thailand

Aims

To analyze the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens in Thai patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection who had pre-existing significant liver fibrosis.

Patients and methods

This was a retrospective cohort study, conducted between 1 June 2018 and 31 May 2019 at Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. All patients completed 12 weeks of SOF-based regimens and had follow-up for at least 12 weeks after therapy discontinuation. The primary outcome was sustained virological response (SVR) 12 weeks after the end of therapy.

Result

A total of 185 patients were included, with 52, 63 and 70 taking SOF+Ledipasvir (SOF+LDV), SOF+LDV+ribavirin (RBV) and SOF+Pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN)+RBV (SOF+Peg-IFN+RBV) respectively. Genotype (GT) 1 was predominant at 40.0%, followed by GT3 at 37.8%, and GT6 at 22.2%. Overall 95.1% of patients in this study achieved SVR (n = 176/185), and the only factor associated with SVR was HCV genotype (p = 0.001). GT6 patients had lower SVR rates compared to GT1 and GT3 patients (82.9%, 98.6%, and 98.6% respectively) while there was no association between SVR and other factors (p >0.05) such as gender, age, BMI, underlying cirrhosis, baseline HCV viral load, or prior treatment history. No serious adverse events were reported in the present study.

Conclusion

Sofosbuvir-based regimens in the treatment of patients with chronic HCV infection were highly efficacious with excellent safety and tolerability profiles in a real-world setting; however, further research is required to establish whether or not such a regimen is an adequate treatment for all genotype 6 patients.

Real-world efficacy and safety of daclatasvir and asunaprevir therapy for hepatitis C virus-infected cirrhosis patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Daclatasvir and asunaprevir combination therapy has shown a high virological response for chronic genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected-patients. However, the real-world efficacy and safety of the therapy for patients with cirrhosis are unknown.

METHODS

A total of 252 patients with genotype 1 HCV infection (158 with chronic hepatitis and 94 with compensated liver cirrhosis) were treated with 24 weeks of daclatasvir and asunaprevir combination therapy. Plasma concentrations of daclatasvir and asunaprevir at day 5 of treatment, end-of-treatment response, sustained virological response (SVR), and the frequencies of adverse events were analyzed.

RESULT

Plasma asunaprevir concentration was significantly higher, and daclatasvir concentration tended to be higher, in cirrhosis patients compared with chronic hepatitis patients. End-of-treatment response was achieved in 95.6% and 94.7% of chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis patients, respectively, and SVR was achieved in 94.3% and 92.6%. Although pre-treatment NS5A drug resistant-associated variants were detected, a high SVR rate was achieved when the population frequency of the variant was low. The frequencies of treatment-related adverse events in cirrhosis patients were similar to those in chronic hepatitis patients. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in three and two patients in chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis groups, respectively; however, four out of five patients with treatment discontinuation nonetheless achieved SVR.

CONCLUSION

Patients with compensated liver cirrhosis have similar virological response and tolerance for daclatasvir plus asunaprevir therapy to patients with chronic hepatitis. This combination therapy might offer a safe and effective treatment for chronic HCV infected-patients with compensated cirrhosis.

The practical management of chronic hepatitis C infection in Japan - dual therapy of daclatasvir + asunaprevir

Without treatment, many of the 200 million people worldwide with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection will develop cirrhosis or liver cancer. Japan was the first nation to approve an interferon-free therapy for HCV, and sustained viral response (SVR) rates >90% have been achieved with asunaprevir, a protease inhibitor, plus daclatasvir, an inhibitor of the non-structural 5A (NS5A) protein. Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the results from both clinical trials and real world experience with asunaprevir and daclatasvir therapy focused primarily on Japan. A literature search using the keywords 'asunaprevir,' 'daclatasvir,' 'interferon-free therapy,' and 'direct-acting antiviral drugs' was initially used to select relevant literature for inclusion in the review. Expert commentary: While not approved in the United States, dual therapy with asunaprevir plus daclatasvir has already been successfully used in Japan and throughout East Asia to treat many thousands of patients. Pre-existing or treatment-emergent NS5A-Y93 or -L31 resistance-associated variants (RAVs) may lead to viral breakthrough, and alternative therapies should be considered for these patients, but patients who harbor NS5A RAVs only at low frequency are likely to achieve SVR. The therapy has also been shown to be safe and effective with renal dysfunction or liver cirrhosis.

Conceptual framework for outcomes research studies of hepatitis C: an analytical review

Hepatitis C virus infection is one of the main causes of chronic liver disease worldwide. Until recently, the standard antiviral regimen for hepatitis C was a combination of an interferon derivative and ribavirin, but a plethora of new antiviral drugs is becoming available. While these new drugs have shown great efficacy in clinical trials, observational studies are needed to determine their effectiveness in clinical practice. Previous observational studies have shown that multiple factors, besides the drug regimen, affect patient outcomes in clinical practice. Here, we provide an analytical review of published outcomes studies of the management of hepatitis C virus infection. A conceptual framework defines the relationships between four categories of variables: health care system structure, patient characteristics, process-of-care, and patient outcomes. This framework can provide a starting point for outcomes studies addressing the use and effectiveness of new antiviral drug treatments.

IMPACT OF THE PEGYLATED-INTERFERON AND RIBAVIRIN THERAPY ON THE TREATMENT-RELATED MORTALITY OF PATIENTS WITH CIRRHOSIS DUE TO HEPATITIS C VIRUS

Although the protease inhibitors have revolutionized the therapy of chronic hepatitis C (CHC), the concomitant use of pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) is associated to a high rate of adverse effects. In this study, we evaluated the consequences of PEG-IFN and RBV and their relationship with mortality in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Medical records of CHC who underwent treatment with PEG-IFN and RBV in a public hospital in Brazil were evaluated. All the patients with cirrhosis were selected, and their clinical and laboratory characteristics, response to treatment, side effects and mortality were evaluated.

RESULTS

From the 1,059 patients with CHC, 257 cirrhotic patients were evaluated. Of these, 45 (17.5%) achieved sustained viral response (SVR). Early discontinuation of therapy occurred in 105 (40.8%) patients, of which 39 (15.2%) were due to serious adverse effects. The mortality rate among the 257 cirrhotic patients was 4.3%, occurring in 06/242 (2.4%) of the Child-A, and in 05/15 (33.3%) of the Child-B patients. In conclusion, the treatment of patients with cirrhosis due to HCV with PEG-IFN and RBV shows a low SVR rate and a high mortality, especially in patients with liver dysfunction.

Costs and outcomes of treating chronic hepatitis C patients in routine care - results from a nationwide multicenter trial

Viral hepatitis is a major public health problem affecting millions of people worldwide. Long-term consequences are the development of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of the study was to assess outcomes and costs of treating patients with chronic hepatitis C in clinical practice in Germany. We carried out a prospective noninterventional study. Information on treatment outcomes, resource utilization and quality of life was provided by 281 physicians throughout Germany. Data of 3708 monoinfected HCV-patients treated between 2008 and 2011 were analysed. Therapy consisted of peginterferon/ribavirin. Mean age of patients was 43.7 years, 60.3% were male and estimated duration of infection was 13.6 years. Predominantly genotype 1 (61.3%) or 3 (28.5%) infections were observed. Sustained viral response (SVR)-rates in most frequently observed genotypes were 49.2% in GT-1 and 61.9% in GT-3 treatment-naive patients (Relapser: GT-1: 35.3% and GT-3: 57.3%; Nonresponder: GT-1: 25.0% and GT-3: 33.3%). Average treatment costs were lowest in treatment-naive patients (€18 965) and higher in patients who failed previous treatments (relapsers: €24 753; nonresponders: €19 511). Differences according to genotype were observed. Average costs per SVR in treatment-naive patients were €44 744 for GT-1 and €22 218 for GT-3. Treatment was associated with a decrease in quality of life; post-treatment quality of life was higher in patients achieving SVR. Our insight on real-life treatment outcomes and costs can serve as a reference for a comparison with other treatments. There is high need for short-term and long-term cost-effectiveness analysis in real-life settings as newly introduced treatment strategies with direct acting antivirals result in high SVR-rates but are more costly.

Evaluation of Dual Therapy in Real Life Setting in Treatment-Naïve Turkish Patients with HCV Infection: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Before the introduction of direct-acting antivirals in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients, the combination of peginterferon alpha and ribavirin was the standard therapy. Observational studies that investigated sustained virological response (SVR) rates by these drugs yielded different outcomes.

AIMS

The goal of the study was to demonstrate real life data concerning SVR rate achieved by peginterferon alpha plus ribavirin in patients who were treatment-naïve.

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter, retrospective observational study.

METHODS

The study was conducted retrospectively on 1214 treatment naïve-patients, being treated with peginterferon alpha-2a or 2b plus ribavirin in respect of the current guidelines between 2005 and 2013. The patients' data were collected from 22 centers via a standard form, which has been prepared for this study. The data included demographic and clinical characteristics (gender, age, body weight, initial Hepatitis C virus RNA (HCV RNA) level, disease staging) as well as course of treatment (duration of treatment, outcomes, discontinuations and adverse events). Renal insufficiency, decompensated liver disease, history of transplantation, immunosuppressive therapy or autoimmune liver disease were exclusion criteria for the study. Treatment efficacy was assessed according to the patient's demographic characteristics, baseline viral load, genotype, and fibrosis scores.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 50.74 (±0.64) years. Most of them were infected with genotype 1 (91.8%). SVR was achieved in 761 (62.7%) patients. SVR rate was 59.1% in genotype 1, 89.4% in genotype 2, 93.8% in genotype 3, and 33.3% in genotype 4 patients. Patients with lower viral load yielded higher SVR (65.8% vs. 58.4%, p=0.09). SVR rates according to histologic severity were found to be 69.3%, 66.3%, 59.9%, 47.3%, and 45.5% in patients with fibrosis stage 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. The predictors of SVR were male gender, genotype 2/3, age less than 45 years, low fibrosis stage, low baseline viral load and presence of early virological response. SVR rates to each peginterferon were found to be similar in genotype 1/4 although SVR rates were found to be higher for peginterferon alpha-2b in patients with genotype 2/3. The number of patients who failed to complete treatment due to adverse effects was 33 (2.7%). The number of patients failed to complete treatment due to adverse effects was 33 (2.7%).

CONCLUSION

Our findings showed that the rate of SVR to dual therapy was higher in treatment-naïve Turkish patients than that reported in randomized controlled trials. Also peginterferon alpha-2a and alpha-2b were found to be similar in terms of SVR in genotype 1 patients.

Cost-effectiveness of sofosbuvir in the treatment of patients with hepatitis C

In France, 190,306 patients were suffering from chronic hepatitis C in 2012. These patients have a decreased life expectancy and are susceptible to complications associated with chronic hepatitis. Current treatments are poorly tolerated and their effectiveness varies depending on the genotype of the virus. Sofosbuvir, a new class of treatment, has demonstrated in five phase III trials sustained viral response (SVR) rates of over 90% across genotypes, higher than current treatments and has a tolerance profile similar to placebo. The objective was to determine the cost-effectiveness of using sofosbuvir in the treatment of chronic HCV infection. A Markov model was used to compare treatment strategies with and without sofosbuvir. The model simulated the natural history of HCV infection. SVR rates were based on data from clinical trials. Utilities associated with different stages of disease were based on data from the literature. French direct medical costs were used. Price for sofosbuvir was the price used in the early access program for severe fibrosis stages. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for sofosbuvir versus current reference treatments was € 16,278/QALY and varied from 40,000 €/QALY for F0 stages to 12,080 €/QALY for F4 stages. The sensitivity analyses carried out confirmed the robustness of this result. Sofosbuvir is a cost-effective treatment option for patients with hepatitis C.

Prospective, observational real-life study on eligibility for and outcomes of antiviral treatment with peginterferon α plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate eligibility, reasons for treatment discontinuation and characteristics of chronic hepatitis C patients with treatment failure to peginterferon/ribavirin in clinical practice.

METHODS

1128 chronic hepatitis C patients, from 45 Italian Hepatology centres, were enrolled in this phase-4, prospective, observational study from January 2009 to February 2010.

RESULTS

687/1118 patients (61.4%) were eligible for antiviral treatment, of which 598 (87.0%) agreed with the physician's decision. Outcome information was available in 500/598 patients, among whom 348 (69.6%) completed treatment. Treatment was discontinued in 152 patients due to: lack of response (28.9%), personal reasons (29.6%), adverse events (38.2%), and decompensation (1.3%). Sustained virological response was obtained in 263/500 (52.6%), 71 (14.2%) relapsed and 61 (12.2%) were non-responders. Treatment outcome was not available in 105 (21%): lost while receiving treatment (33.3%), lost during follow-up (25.7%), withdrawn for adverse events (19.1%) or for administrative reasons (21.9%).

CONCLUSION

In clinical practice, only 61% of chronic hepatitis C patients are considered eligible for peginterferon/ribavirin. Of these, 13% refuse treatment. Approximately 30% do not complete the scheduled treatment and, despite this, the sustained virological response rate is similar to that of randomized-controlled trials. In the era of new antiviral combinations, these findings have important implications for assessing eligibility and estimating drop-out rates.

Hepatitis C virus treatment in the 'real-world': how well do 'real' patients respond?

BACKGROUND

Published clinical trials of the treatment of HCV are largely multicentre prospective pharmaceutical trials. Patients in clinical trials tend to have more favorable outcomes than patients in the 'real-world', due to strict patient selection and differences in treatment conditions and available resources.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the outcomes of Hepatitis C infected patients treated at the Barwon Health Liver Clinic with combination Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and Ribavirin (RBV) therapy and to determine factors associated with a treatment response.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients who received treatment for Hepatitis C at our institution's Liver Clinic from January 2001-September 2011. Patient demographics, comorbidities, treatment-related parameters and side effects were extracted from medical records and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 190 patients (120 male, 70 female) with a mean age of 42.8 years (range 20-68 years) commenced treatment. The most common genotype was genotype 3 (48.9%), followed by genotype 1 (42.6%). 150 of 190 patients (78.9%) completed treatment and had end of treatment data available. 107 of 182 patients, (58.8%) for whom sustained virologic response (SVR) rate data was available achieved an SVR. Overall response rates were; 46.9%, 68.8% and 62.4% in genotypes 1, 2 and 3 respectively. The response rate was significantly lower in 29 patients with documented cirrhosis (20.7%). Age, diabetes and alcohol abuse did not predict treatment response in our cohort. Side effects reported in 81.6% of patients included general malaise, hematological disturbance and psychiatric issues, and necessitated cessation of therapy in 16 patients (8.4%) and dose reduction in 26 patients (13.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Response rates to combination PEG-IFN and RBV therapy at our institution are comparable to other 'real-world' and pharmaceutical registration trials. Side effects of combination therapy were prominent but resulted in fewer discontinuations of therapy compared to pharmaceutical trials.

Association between age at diagnosis and degree of liver injury in hepatitis C

Introduction

A population-based survey conducted in Brazilian capital cities found that only 16% of the population had ever been tested for hepatitis C. These data suggest that much of the Brazilian population with HCV infection remains undiagnosed. The distribution of age ranges at diagnosis and its association with the degree of hepatitis C are still unknown in Brazilian patients.

Material and methods

Patients with HCV infection, diagnosed by HCV RNA (Amplicor-HCV, Roche), were included in the study. Patients with HBV or HIV coinfection, autoimmune diseases, or alcohol intake > 20 g/day were excluded. HCV genotyping was performed by sequence analysis, and viral load by quantitative RT-PCR (Amplicor, Roche). The METAVIR classification was used to assess structural liver injury. The Chi-square (χ²) test and student's t-test were used for between-group comparisons. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient were used for analysing the correlation between parameters.

Results

A total of 525 charts were reviewed. Of the patients included, 49.5% were male, only 10% of the patients were aged less than 30 years; peak prevalence of HCV infection occurred in the 51-to-60 years age range. Genotype 1 accounted for 65.4% of the cases. Information on HCV subtype was obtained in 227 patients; 105 had subtype 1a and 122 had 1b. According to the degree of structural liver injury, 8.3% had F0, 23.4% F1, 19.8% F2, 11.9% F3, and 36.5% F4. Age at diagnosis of hepatitis correlated significantly with fibrosis (rs = 0.307, p < 0.001). The degree of fibrosis increased with advancing age. Only age at diagnosis and fasting blood glucose were independently associated with disease stage. Those patients with subtype 1a had higher prevalence of F2–F4 than those with subtype 1b.

Conclusion

In Brazil, diagnosis of hepatitis C is more commonly established in older patients (age 45–60 years) with more advanced disease. Reassessment of strategies for hepatitis C diagnosis in the country is required.

Clinical outcomes in a cohort of anti-hepatitis C virus-positive patients with significant barriers to treatment referred to a Norwegian outpatient clinic

OBJECTIVE

Patient selection and management of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in Norwegian outpatient clinics is not well studied. The aim of the study was to characterize CHC patients referred to a large university hospital in Norway, identify treatment barriers, and investigate the course and outcomes of treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective observational cohort study, all anti-HCV-positive patients referred to Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, for treatment evaluation during the period 2007-2010 were included. Demographics, clinical, laboratory, and treatment results were obtained from electronic medical records.

RESULTS

A total of 256 patients were included. The patients were young (mean age 36 ± 10.3), with a high prevalence of genotypes 3 (55%) and 1 (43%) and low levels of fibrosis (77% <F2). The majority of patients were former or current injection drug users (85%). Treatment uptake among patients attending the clinic was 47% (n = 91). Treatment was significantly less common in patients who were unemployed, those who had nonattendances during clinical evaluation, those with genotypes 1 or 4, those ≥50 years of age, and patients with no biopsy. For patients initiating treatment, the total sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was 63% (by complete case analysis 73%). For genotypes 1 and 3, SVR was achieved in 44% and 75%, respectively, by intention to treat.

CONCLUSIONS

A high treatment uptake of CHC patients in a cohort with high prevalence of injection drug use was found. Young age, low degrees of fibrosis, and good patient attendance ensured a high rate of SVR.

How to optimize current therapy of HCV genotype 1 infection with boceprevir

Treatment with first generation protease inhibitors (PIs) is a milestone in the history of HCV therapy. Triple therapy with boceprevir (BOC) improves sustained virological response (SVR) by 30% in treatment naïve genotype 1 patients and by 50-60% in relapsers, 40-45% in partial responders and 25% in null responders compared with the Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin regimen. To optimize BOC treatment, screening and access to treatment must be improved in genotype 1 patients. To select the ideal candidate for immediate treatment with triple therapy, an individual risk/benefit ratio must be assessed. Recent data have shown that patients with compensated cirrhosis and more advanced disease may also benefit from this regimen. Moreover, in HCV patients with extrahepatic manifestations, patients with HCV recurrence after liver transplantation and HIV-HCV co-infected patients, immediate treatment with triple therapy should be discussed. There is growing evidence that triple therapy with BOC is cost-effective in genotype 1 patients. Finally, the treatment design of BOC must be optimized in relation to baseline characteristics, so that optimal stopping rules can be followed, Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can be prevented and AEs can be accurately prevented and managed.

Impact of emerging hepatitis C virus treatments on future needs for liver transplantation in France: a modelling approach

BACKGROUND

In light of the impact of emerging hepatitis C virus treatments on morbidity and mortality, we sought to determine whether candidates for liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma and decompensated cirrhosis will decrease sufficiently to match liver grafts for hepatitis C virus-infected patients.

AIMS

Using a Markov model, we quantified future liver graft needs for hepatitis C virus-induced diseases and estimated the impact of current and emerging treatments.

METHODS

We simulated progression of yearly-hepatitis-C-virus-infected cohorts from the beginning of the epidemic and calculated 2013-2022 candidates for liver transplantation up until 2022 without and with therapies. We compared these estimated numbers to projected trends in liver grafts for hepatitis C virus.

RESULTS

Overall, current treatment would avoid transplantation of 4425 (4183-4684) potential candidates during the period 2013-2022. It would enable an 88% and 42% reduction in the gap between liver transplantation activity and candidates for hepatocellular carcinoma and decompensated cirrhosis, respectively. Emerging hepatitis C virus treatments would allow adequacy in transplant activities for hepatocellular carcinoma. However, they would not lead to adequacy in decompensated cirrhosis from 2013 to 2022. Results were robust to sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that patients will benefit from public health policies regarding hepatitis C virus screening and therapeutic access to new emerging treatments.

Longitudinal assessment of liver stiffness in patients undergoing antiviral treatment for hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Liver stiffness has been suggested as a parameter of fibrosis progression/regression in hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients.

AIM

To evaluate stiffness before and after peginterferon-ribavirin treatment.

METHODS

Stiffness was prospectively measured in 74 HCV patients, 32 genotypes 1/4 (43.25%) and 42 genotypes 2/3 (56.75%), before, at end of treatment, and after 3 years of follow-up (49 patients). On the same study day, 21 patients underwent liver biopsy.

RESULTS

In 55 patients with sustained virological response (74.32%), liver stiffness decreased significantly at end of therapy (6.8±4.9kPa) vs. baseline (9.5±6.9kPa, p=0.04). The decrease vs. baseline was maintained in 30 sustained virological response patients after 3 years follow-up (6.8±4.6kPa vs. 10.8±8.5kPa, p=0.0141). No difference was found at end of treatment vs. baseline (10.1±4.7kPa vs. 9.7±4.2kPa, p=0.825) and after 3 years of follow-up vs. baseline (10.2±3.4kPa vs. 9.7±4.2kPa, p=0.765) in null responders. Similar results were found in relapsers at end of treatment vs. baseline (13.7±7.7kPa vs. 15.2±8.2kPa, p=0.74), and after 3 years of follow-up vs. baseline (16.9±10.0kPa vs. 15.2±8.2kPa, p=0.734). Pre-treatment stiffness >12kPa was significantly associated with no SVR (p<0.025), RR=2.44 (95%C.I. 1.17-5.07).

CONCLUSION

Liver stiffness may be useful to assess long-term antiviral treatment response.

Protease inhibitor-based triple therapy in chronic hepatitis C: guidelines by the French Association for the Study of the Liver

The recent marketing authorizations and hence availability of the new protease inhibitors, telaprevir and boceprevir, have profoundly changed the management of chronic hepatitis C patients. Guidelines for the use of these new drugs as part of a triple therapy, in combination with the standard therapy of peginterferon plus ribavirin, are proposed. The guidelines have been drawn up and evaluated by a meeting of the French Association for the Study of the Liver, posted online for comments, and extensively reviewed by international experts. The current published data on the various treatment strategies are reviewed. The guidelines address the majority of patient profiles including treatment-naïve patients and patients with failure of previous treatment. They recommend which patients should be treated with triple therapy and consider the results of triple therapy including the factors that are predictive of response. They consider the circumstances in which the length of triple therapy can be shortened and the advantages of a peginterferon plus ribavirin lead-in phase. Virological monitoring, stopping criteria, the evaluation of resistance to protease inhibitors, practical treatment management, treatment adherence and the management of side effects are discussed and simple guidelines proposed.

Ultrasound-assisted one-pot synthesis of anti-CML nucleosides featuring 1,2,3-triazole nucleobase under iron-copper catalysis

A simple and efficient synthesis of modified 1,2,3-triazole nucleosides was developed. The strategy involved sequential one-pot acetylation-azidation-cycloaddition procedure and was found to be highly effective under a cooperative effect of ultrasound activation and iron/copper catalysis. The reactions were carried out under both conventional and ultrasonic irradiation conditions. In general, improvement in rates and yields were observed when reactions were carried out under sonication compared with conventional conditions. This one-pot procedure provides several advantages such as operational simplicity, high yield, safety and environment friendly protocol. The resulting substituted nucleosides were evaluated for their anticancer activity against K562 chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cell line.

Factors responsible for the discrepancy between IL28B polymorphism prediction and the viral response to peginterferon plus ribavirin therapy in Japanese chronic hepatitis C patients

AIM

  IL28B polymorphisms serve to predict response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin therapy (PEG IFN/RBV) in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) very reliably. However, the prediction by the IL28B polymorphism contradicted the virological response to PEG IFN/RBV in some patients. Here, we aimed to investigate the factors responsible for the discrepancy between the IL28B polymorphism prediction and virological responses.

METHODS

  CHC patients with genotype 1b and high viral load were enrolled in this study. In a case-control study, clinical and virological factors were analyzed for 130 patients with rs8099917 TT genotype and 96 patients with rs8099917 TG or GG genotype who were matched according to sex, age, hemoglobin level and platelet count.

RESULTS

  Higher low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, lower γ-glutamyltransferase and the percentage of wild-type phenotype at amino acids 70 and 91 were significantly associated with the rs8099917 TT genotype. Multivariate analysis showed that rs8099917 TG or GG genotype, older age and lower LDL cholesterol were independently associated with the non-virological responder (NVR) phenotype. In patients with rs8099917 TT genotype (predicted as virological responder [VR]), multivariate analysis showed that older age was independently associated with NVR. In patients with rs8099917 TG or GG genotype (predicted as NVR), multivariate analysis showed that younger age was independently associated with VR.

CONCLUSION

  Patient age gave rise to the discrepancy between the prediction by IL28B polymorphism and the virological responses, suggesting that patients should be treated at a younger age.

Future treatment of patients with HCV cirrhosis

Of all hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients, those with cirrhosis are most in need of treatment because of increased morbidity and mortality. Treatment with pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) (PR) has definitely shown the benefits of successful treatment by improving fibrosis, causing the regression of cirrhosis and reducing and preventing cirrhosis-related complications. However, the sustained virological response (SVR) is lower in patients with cirrhosis. First generation protease inhibitors (boceprevir and telaprevir) in combination with PR are a major advancement in the treatment of both naïve and treatment-experienced genotype 1 patients. In naïve patients, the SVR rate with the triple regimen with boceprevir was increased by 14% in patients with severe fibrosis or cirrhosis compared with PR. This benefit was lower than that observed in patients with mild or moderate fibrosis (30%). The SVR rate of the triple regimen with telaprevir was increased by 10-30% compared with PR in patients with severe fibrosis or cirrhosis compared with nearly 30% in patients with mild or moderate fibrosis. In treatment-experienced patients, previous relapsers have the highest increase in SVR with the triple regimen compared with PR, whatever the status of fibrosis. Previous partial or non-responder patients with cirrhosis had lower SVR rates than those without cirrhosis. However, the benefits of telaprevir and boceprevir vs PR was maintained. Previous non-responder patients with cirrhosis benefited the least from treatment. The relapse rate was always higher and side effects were more frequent in patients with cirrhosis compared with those without. First generation protease inhibitors plus PR appear to be a new step forward in the management of HCV genotype 1 patients with cirrhosis.