Factors affecting disease-free survival in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer who receive adjuvant trastuzumab

Prognostic significance of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), known as a key systemic inflammatory parameter, has been proved to be associated with response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer (BC); however, the results remain controversial. This meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the prognostic values of PLR in patients with BC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant literature published on the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science databases and the Cochrane Library.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All studies involving patients with BC treated with NACT and peripheral blood pretreatment PLR recorded were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two researchers independently extracted and evaluated HR/OR and its 95% CI of survival outcomes, pathological complete response (pCR) rate and clinicopathological parameters.

RESULTS

The last search was updated to 31 December 2022. A total of 22 studies with 5533 patients with BC treated with NACT were enrolled in the final meta-analysis. Our results demonstrate that elevated PLR value appears to correlate with low pCR rate (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.88, p<0.001, I2=75.80%, Ph<0.001) and poor prognosis, including overall survival (OS) (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.59, p<0.001; I2=7.40%, Ph=0.365) and disease-free survival (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.56 to 2.50, p<0.001; I2=0.0%, Ph=0.460). Furthermore, PLR level was associated with age (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.93, p<0.001, I2=40.60%, Ph=0.096), menopausal status (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.90, p<0.001, I2=50.80%, Ph=0.087) and T stage (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11, p=0.035; I2=70.30%, Ph=0.005) of patients with BC.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated that high PLR was significantly related to the low pCR rate, poor OS and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with BC treated with NACT. Therefore, PLR can be used as a potential predictor biomarker for the efficacy of NACT in BC.

Eosinophilia in cancer and its regulation by sex hormones

Gender differences in the functionality of the immune system have been attributed, in part, to direct and indirect effects of sex steroids, especially estrogens, on immune cell repertoire and activity. Notable are studies that have defined roles for estrogens in the regulation of the biology of dendritic cells (DCs), macrophages, T cells and natural killer (NK) cells. Although estrogens can modulate eosinophil function, the mechanisms by which this occurs and how it contributes to the pathobiology of different diseases remains underexplored. Furthermore, although the importance of eosinophils in infection is well established, it remains unclear as to how these innate immune cells, which are present in different tumors, impact the biology of cancer cells and/or response to therapeutics. The observation that eosinophilia influences the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) is significant considering the role of estrogens as regulators of eosinophil function and recent studies suggesting that response to ICBs is impacted by gender. Thus, in this review, we consider what is known about the roles of estrogen(s) in regulating tissue eosinophilia/eosinophil function and how this influences the pathobiology of breast cancer (in particular). This information provides the context for a discussion of how estrogens/the estrogen receptor (ER) signaling axis can be targeted in eosinophils and how this would be expected to influence the activity of standard-of-care interventions and contemporary immunotherapy regimens in cancer(s).

Excess of blood eosinophils prior to therapy correlates with worse prognosis in mesothelioma

Background

Only a fraction of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) will respond to chemo- or immunotherapy. For the majority, the condition will irremediably relapse after 13 to 18 months. In this study, we hypothesized that patients' outcome could be correlated to their immune cell profile. Focus was given to peripheral blood eosinophils that, paradoxically, can both promote or inhibit tumor growth depending on the cancer type.

Methods

The characteristics of 242 patients with histologically proven MPM were retrospectively collected in three centers. Characteristics included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). The mean absolute eosinophil counts (AEC) were determined by averaging AEC data sets of the last month preceding the administration of chemo- or immunotherapy.

Results

An optimal cutoff of 220 eosinophils/µL of blood segregated the cohort into two groups with significantly different median OS after chemotherapy (14 and 29 months above and below the threshold, p = 0.0001). The corresponding two-year OS rates were 28% and 55% in the AEC ≥ 220/µL and AEC < 220/µL groups, respectively. Based on shorter median PFS (8 vs 17 months, p < 0.0001) and reduced DCR (55.9% vs 35.2% at 6 months), the response to standard chemotherapy was significantly affected in the AEC ≥ 220/µL subset. Similar conclusions were also drawn from data sets of patients receiving immune checkpoint-based immunotherapy.

Conclusion

In conclusion, baseline AEC ≥ 220/µL preceding therapy is associated with worse outcome and quicker relapse in MPM.

Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio associated with the clinicopathological features and prognostic value of breast cancer: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The association of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) with the clinicopathological features and prognosis in patients with breast cancer was evaluated.

METHOD

Related studies were searched from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to July 1, 2021. Then, basic characteristic and prognostic data were extracted from the included studies. We synthesized and compared primary outcomes such as overall survival. Subgroups analyses in pathology, geographical area, follow-up time, and sample size were conducted. The pooled hazard ratio (HR), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) served as measures to assess the relationship of PLR with prognosis and clinicopathological features of breast cancer patients. After literature retrieval and selection, 20 studies with 7484 patients were included in this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

High PLR was significantly related to poor overall survival (HR = 1.88; 95% CI 1.61, 2.19; P < 0.001) in breast cancer patients. Also, high PLR was associated with lymph node metastasis (LNM) (OR = 1.82; 95% CI 1.32, 2.52; P < 0.001), advanced tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage (OR = 1.89; 95% CI 1.25, 2.87; P = 0.003), and distant metastasis (OR = 1.76; 95% CI 1.14, 2.72; P = 0.01) in breast cancer. The stability and reliability of results in this meta-analysis were confirmed by sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSION

Elevated PLR is related to a poor prognosis and a higher risk of LNM, advanced TNM stage, and distant metastasis in breast cancer patients. Therefore, PLR can be identified as a biomarker with potential prognostic value in breast cancer.

Associations of Complete Blood Count Parameters with Disease-Free Survival in Right- and Left-Sided Colorectal Cancer Patients

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Some complete blood count (CBC) parameters are found to be associated with CRC prognosis. In this study, ninety-seven pretreated CRC patients were included, and the patients were divided into two groups: left-sided and right-sided, depending on the anatomical location of the tumor. Based on clinicopathologic features including tumor budding, disease stages, and tumor anatomical location, levels of CBC parameters were compared, and disease-free survivals (DFS) were determined. There were differences between patients with different tumor budding scores for only three parameters, including red cell distribution width (RDW), numbers of platelets, and mean platelet volume (MPV). Furthermore, numbers of WBCs, monocytes, and MPV in CRC patients with early disease stages were higher than those with advanced stages. However, levels of eosinophil in CRC patients with advanced stages were higher than those with early stages. Depending on the tumor anatomical location, we observed that numbers of red blood cells (RBCs), hemoglobin (Hgb), and hematocrit (Hct) in CRC patients with left-sided tumors were higher than those with right-sided tumors. We found that low levels of MPV were associated with shorter DFS. However, high levels of eosinophils were associated with shorter DFS in all CRC patients. When patients were divided based on the tumor anatomical location, higher levels of MPV, MCHC, and Hgb were associated with better DFS in the left-sided but not right-sided CRC patients. However, left-sided, but not right-sided, CRC patients with high levels of eosinophil and RDW had shorter DFS. Furthermore, right-sided, but not left-sided, CRC patients with high levels of platelets tended to have a shorter DFS. Our data show that MPV and eosinophils could serve as potential prognostic biomarkers in pre-treatment CRC patients, regardless of the tumor anatomical location. Additionally, lower levels of MPV, MCHC, and Hgb, and high levels of eosinophils and RDW could be negative predictive biomarkers in left-sided CRC patients.

White Blood Cells in Patients Treated with Programmed Cell Death-1 Inhibitors for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose

To investigate whether eosinophils and other white blood cell subtypes could be used as response and prognostic markers to anti-Programmed cell Death-1 or anti-PD-Ligand-1 treatments in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from the NSCLC patients consecutively treated at our hospital with a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor in monotherapy for advanced disease. A total of 191 patients were evaluated at three time-points to investigate any relation between tumor response and WBC counts.

Results

Baseline WBC and subtypes did not differ according to the type of response seen under treatment. A higher relative eosinophil count (REC) correlated with more objective responses (p = 0.019 at t1 and p = 0.014 at t2; OR for progression = 0.54 and 0.53, respectively) independently of the smoking status, PD-L1 status, and immune-related toxicity (IRT). Higher REC was also associated with a longer duration of treatment (p = 0.0096). Baseline absolute neutrophil count was prognostic (p = 0.049). At t1 relative lymphocytes, absolute and relative neutrophils, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were prognostic (p = 0.044, p = 0.014, p = 0.0033, and p = 0.029, respectively).

Conclusion

Our results show that in NSCLC patients anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy induces an early increase only in blood eosinophils, more prominent in responding patients and independent of the smoking status, PD-L1 status, and IRT. Eosinophils are also associated with a longer duration of treatment. Furthermore, our data support a prognostic role of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and their ratio for NSCLC patients with advanced disease treated with PD(L)-1 blockade.

Immunity and Breast Cancer: Focus on Eosinophils

The role of eosinophils, a cell type involved in the immune response to parasitic infections and allergies, has been investigated in different cancer types, in both tumor tissue and at the circulating level. Most studies showed a role mainly in conjunction with immunotherapy in melanomas and lung tumors, while few data are available in breast cancer. In this review, we summarize literature data on breast cancer, showing a prognostic role of circulating eosinophil counts as well as of the presence of tumor tissue infiltration by eosinophils. In particular, some studies showed an association between a higher circulating eosinophil count and a good prognosis, as well as an association with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in hormone receptor-negative/HER2-positive and in triple negative breast cancer. Several mechanistic studies have also been conducted in in vivo models, but the exact mechanism by which eosinophils act in the presence of breast cancer is still unknown. Further studies on this subject are desirable, in order to understand their role at the cellular level, identify related biomarkers and/or possibly search for new therapeutic targets.

Prognostic Relevance of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) in Luminal Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis in the Neoadjuvant Setting

The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a promising predictive and prognostic factor in breast cancer. We investigated its ability to predict disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with luminal A- or luminal B-HER2-negative breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Pre-treatment complete blood cell counts from 168 consecutive patients with luminal breast cancer were evaluated to assess NLR. The study population was stratified into NLR^low or NLR^high according to a cut-off value established by receiving operator curve (ROC) analysis. Data on additional pre- and post-treatment clinical-pathological characteristics were also collected. Kaplan–Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models were used for statistical analyses. Patients with pre-treatment NLR^low showed a significantly shorter DFS (HR: 6.97, 95% CI: 1.65–10.55, p = 0.002) and OS (HR: 7.79, 95% CI: 1.25–15.07, p = 0.021) compared to those with NLR^high. Non-ductal histology, luminal B subtype, and post-treatment Ki67 ≥ 14% were also associated with worse DFS (p = 0.016, p = 0.002, and p = 0.001, respectively). In a multivariate analysis, luminal B subtype, post-treatment Ki67 ≥ 14%, and NLR^low remained independent prognostic factors for DFS, while only post-treatment Ki67 ≥ 14% and NLR^low affected OS. The present study provides evidence that pre-treatment NLR^low helps identify women at higher risk of recurrence and death among patients affected by luminal breast cancer treated with NACT.

Relationship Between FDG Uptake and the Platelet/lymphocyte Ratio in Patients With Breast Invasive Ductal Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

We investigated the relationship between F18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake and the platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), as both represent inflammation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 143 consecutive invasive ductal carcinoma patients who had undergone preoperative FDG-PET and surgery. We divided the patients into groups based on their maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) values: low (<2.5) and high (≥2.5) and based on their PLRs: low (<130) and high (≥130). We determined the relationships between the SUVmax or PLR and clinicopathological features.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients (51.0%) had a high SUVmax in their primary tumor. There were significant associations between SUVmax and the PLR. A multivariate analysis revealed that high PLR, but not NLR, was independent factor associated with a high SUVmax. Seventy-four patients (51.7%) had a high PLR; The factors significantly associated with high PLR were large tumor size, presence of node metastasis, presence of vascular invasion, high NLR, and high SUVmax.

CONCLUSION

In breast cancer patients, the PLR is independently associated with the SUVmax, but not with recurrent disease. In breast cancer patients with a high SUVmax and/or PLR, these values may reflect the tumor microenvironment.

The Prognostic Impact of Eosinophils and the Eosinophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio on Survival Outcomes in Stage II Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The relationship between eosinophils and cancer prognosis is unknown. Therefore, we analyzed the relationship between circulating eosinophils and the survival of stage IIA and IIB pancreatic cancer patients who underwent surgical resection.

METHODS

This study included a retrospective cohort of 67 consecutive patients. Patients were categorized into two different groups based on the optimal cutoff for pretreatment levels of each biomarker, according to the receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

The Kaplan-Meier method showed that low eosinophil (P = 0.0403), high neutrophil (P = 0.0066), and high monocyte (P = 0.0003) counts were associated with short overall survival (OS). Low lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (P = 0.0194) and eosinophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (ELR) (P = 0.0413) were associated with reduced OS. In multivariate analysis, histological differentiation (P = 0.0014), high neutrophils (P = 0.047), high monocytes (P = 0.029), and low eosinophils (P < 0.0001) were correlated with poorer OS. Histological differentiation (P = 0.033), low lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (P = 0.029), and low ELR (P = 0.005) were correlated with poor OS and were significant independent prognostic factors of poor outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Low eosinophils and low ELR were significant independent prognostic factors of poor outcomes.

Blood eosinophilic relative count is prognostic for breast cancer and associated with the presence of tumor at diagnosis and at time of relapse

Background

Cancer outcome is associated with circulating immune cells, including eosinophils. Here we analyze the relative eosinophil count (REC) in different breast cancer subtypes.

Methods

Stage I–III breast cancer patients were included in the study and classified as REC-high vs low (cutoff 1.5%) or relative lymphocyte count (RLC)-high vs low (cutoff 17.5%). The co-primary endpoints were the breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) or the time to treatment failure (TTF) in the REC groups.

Results

Overall 930 patients were included in the study. We observed a benefit for REC-high vs REC-low in TTF (HR 0.610, 95% CI 0.458–0.812), and in BCSS (HR 0.632, 95% CI 0.433–0.923). Similarly, we observed a better TTF (HR 0.421, 95% CI 0.262–0.677) and BCSS (HR 0.350, 95% CI 0.200–0.614) in RLC-high vs low. A lower relapse rate was observed in the REC-high vs REC-low group (17.1% vs 24.7%, p = 0.005), not confirmed in the multivariate analysis. A lower median REC at baseline and at relapse was observed compared to REC after surgery and during cancer-free follow-up (p < .0001).

Conclusions

REC could be a new promising, affordable and accessible predictive and prognostic biomarker in all breast cancer subtypes.

Platelet/Lymphocyte Ratio Is Superior to Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of Chemotherapy Response and Disease-free Survival in Luminal B-like (HER2-) Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been associated with the prognosis in breast cancer (BC). The relationship of the NLR and PLR with chemotherapy sensitivity and prognosis in luminal B-like (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative [HER2^-]) BC are not well studied.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The clinical data from 980 patients with luminal B-like (HER2^-) BC from June 2012 to June 2016 were collected. The differences among the variables were calculated using the χ² test. The associations among the clinicopathologic factors, pretreatment NLR, pretreatment PLR, and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox analyses.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 37 months (range, 5-77 months). For the 480 patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, low pretreatment PLR values were associated with higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rates compared with the high PLR group (15.8% for low vs. 9.2% for high PLR group; P = .027). Multivariate analyses showed that larger tumors, a greater number of lymph nodes involved, a high Ki-67 score, and a high PLR were independent prognostic factors of worse outcomes for the patients with luminal B-like (HER2^-) BC. The risk of metastasis and/or recurrence was greater for the high PLR group than for the low PLR group (hazard ratio, 1.576; 95% confidence interval, 1.039-2.390; P = .032). The pretreatment NLR showed no such associations among this cohort of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study have shown that the pretreatment PLR is superior to the NLR as a predictor of pCR and DFS outcomes in patients with luminal B-like (HER2^-) BC. A low pretreatment PLR was associated with higher pCR rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and was an independent predictive factor for better DFS outcomes among patients with luminal B-like (HER2^-) BC.

High Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Predicts Poor Survival in Patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 Positive Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Trastuzumab

Purpose

Neutrophils and platelets have been described as tumor-promoting factors, but lymphocytes have been described as tumor-inhibiting factors. The prognostic values of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been explored in human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-positive breast cancer, however, the value of the systemic immune- inflammation index (SII) has not been studied in this molecular subtype. Our study aimed to compare the prognostic values of these inflammation-based indexes in Chinese HER2-positive breast cancer patients who received adjuvant trastuzumab.

Methods

A total of 147 HER2-positive breast cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed. The association between clinicopathological factors and inflammation-based indexes was investigated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS); the Log rank test was performed to comparatively evaluate the survivals between the high-value and low-value groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors.

Results

The SII value correlated significantly with histological grade (HG)(p=0.016). The cut-off values determined by ROC analysis for the NLR, PLR and SII were 1.69, 110 and 442, and the corresponding areas under the curves (AUCs) were 0.621, 0.639 and 0.674, respectively. The 5-year DFS was significantly lower in the NLR-high than in the NLR-low group (75.8% vs. 90.7%, p<0.01), in the PLR-high than in the PLR-low group (76.7% vs. 90.6%, p<0.01) and in the SII-high than in the SII-low group (66.8% vs. 90.7%, p<0.01). The 5-year OS was significantly lower in the PLR-high than in the PLR-low group (83.2% vs. 100%, p=0.035) and in the SII-high than in the SII-low group (77.3% vs. 96.4%, p=0.012). A multivariate regression model revealed that tumor size, lymph node involvement, HG, hormone receptor status, PLR and SII were independently correlated with DFS; lymph node involvement and SII were independently correlated with OS.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that SII is an independent prognostic factor for DFS and OS in HER2-positive breast cancer, and in terms of prognostic reliability, the SII is superior to other inflammation-based indexes.

Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio for breast cancer patients: An updated meta-analysis of 17079 individuals

Aims

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic effect of neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for patients with breast cancer (BC).

Methods

A literature search was performed by searching medical databases. Basic characteristics and prognostic data were extracted from included studies. Primary outcomes, such as overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS), were synthesized and compared. Subgroup analyses were performed according to pathology, geographical region, cut‐off value, and tumor progression.

Results

A total of 39 studies comprising 17079 BC patients were included in this meta‐analysis. Among them, 28 studies with 142 64 BC patients investigated predicting role of NLR for OS, showing elevated NLR were associated poor prognosis (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49‐2.13, P < 0.001). Twenty‐seven studies containing 115 04 patients explored the role of NLR in predicting DFS, showing elevated NLR was associated with poor DFS with HR of 1.60 (95% CI: 1.42‐1.96, P < 0.001). Twelve studies explored the role of PLR in predicting OS, showing patients with higher PLR were associated with a significantly worse prognosis with a pooled HR of 1.32 (95% CI: 1.11‐1.57, P = 0.002). Eleven studies with 5013 patients shown patients with elevated PLR were associated shorter DFS (HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.09‐1.86, P = 0.009). Subgroup analyses shown a greater magnitude of association between NLR and OS in triple‐negative BC patients than in HER2‐positive ones.

Conclusions

Our study suggested that elevated NLR and PLR were associated with poor OS as well as high risk of recurrence for BC patients. Subgroup analyses confirmed the prognostic effect of NLR and PLR in HER2‐positive BC patients. As easily accessible parameters, NLR and PLR should be identified as useful biomarkers in the management of BC.

Opposing roles of eosinophils in cancer

Eosinophils are a subset of granulocytes mostly known for their ability to combat parasites and induce allergy. Although they were described to be related to cancer more than 100 years ago, their role in tumors is still undefined. Recent observations revealed that they display regulatory functions towards other immune cell subsets in the tumor microenvironment or direct cytotoxic functions against tumor cells, leading to either antitumor or protumor effects. This paradoxical role of eosinophils was suggested to be dependent on the different factors in the TME. In addition, the clinical relevance of these cells has been recently addressed. In most cases, the accumulation of eosinophils both in the tumor tissue, called tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia, and in the peripheral blood were reported to be prognostic markers for a better outcome of cancer patients. In immunotherapy of cancer, particularly in therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors, eosinophils were even shown to be a potential predictive marker for a beneficial clinical response. A better understanding of their role in cancer progression will help to establish them as prognostic and predictive markers and to design strategies for targeting eosinophils.

Predictive and prognostic role of peripheral blood eosinophil count in triple-negative and hormone receptor-negative/HER2-positive breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment

In current clinical practices, up to 27% of all breast cancer patients receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. High pathological complete response rate is frequently associated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Additionally, circulating immune cells are also often linked to chemotherapy response. We performed a retrospective analysis on a cohort of 112 breast cancer patients (79 triple-negative, 33 hormone receptor-negative/HER2-positive) treated with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eosinophil and lymphocyte counts were collected from whole blood at baseline and during follow-ups and their associations with pathological complete response, relapse, disease-free and breast cancer-specific survival were analyzed. We observed a higher pathological complete response rate in patients who presented at baseline a relative eosinophil count ≥ 1.5% (55.6%) than in those with a relative eosinophil count < 1.5% (36.2%)(p = 0.04). An improvement in breast cancer-specific survival in patients with high relative eosinophil count (p = 0.05; HR = 0.336; 95% CI = 0.107-1.058) or with high relative lymphocyte count (threshold = 17.5%, p = 0.01; HR = 0.217; 95% CI = 0.060-0.783) were also observed. Upon combining the two parameters into the eosinophil x lymphocyte product with a threshold at 35.8, associations with pathological complete response (p = 0.002), relapse (p = 0.028), disease-free survival (p = 0.012) and breast cancer-specific survival (p = 0.001) were also recorded. In conclusion, the relative eosinophil count and eosinophil x lymphocyte product could be promising, affordable and accessible new biomarkers that are predictive for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and prognostic for longer survival in triple-negative and hormone receptors-negative/HER2-positive breast cancers. Confirmation of these results in a larger patient population is needed.

The impacts of pretreatment circulating eosinophils and basophils on prognosis of stage Ⅰ-Ⅲ colorectal cancer

AIM

The effects of circulating eosinophils and basophils on cancer survival are unclear. Here, we aimed to explore the impacts of eosinophils and basophils on prognosis of stage I-III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

METHODS

From February 2003 to March 2013, 569 stage I-III CRC patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. The associations between pretreatment circulating eosinophils, basophils and CRC overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) were investigated. Moreover, the prognostic value of combined eosinophils/basophils and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR)/platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) was investigated.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier methods showed the associations of eosinophils < 0.095 × 10⁹ /L and shorter OS (P < 0.0001), eosinophils < 0.055 × 10⁹ /L and shorter DFS (P < 0.0001), basophils < 0.015 × 10⁹ /L and shorter OS (P = 0.001), basophils < 0.015 × 10⁹ /L and shorter DFS (P = 0.005). Cox regression model showed that eosinophils < 0.095 × 10⁹ /L (hazard ratio [HR], 1.723; 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.177-2.523) and basophils < 0.015 × 10⁹ /L (HR, 1.714; 95% CI = 1.152-2.548) were independent prognostic factors for OS, and eosinophils < 0.055 × 10⁹ /L (HR, 2.309; 95% CI = 1.587-3.361) and basophils < 0.015 × 10⁹ /L (HR, 1.397; 95% CI = 1.003-1.945) were independent prognostic factors for DFS, respectively. The combined eosinophil-PLR (HR, 2.611; 95% CI = 1.328-5.130) and basophil-PLR (HR, 2.520; 95% CI = 1.240-5.123) were the independent prognostic factors for OS. The combined eosinophil-NLR (HR, 2.770; 95% CI = 1.528-5.019) and eosinophil-PLR (HR, 4.788; 95% CI = 2.458-9.329) were the independent prognostic factors for DFS.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment circulating eosinophils < 0.095 × 10⁹ /L/0.055 × 10⁹ /L and circulating basophils < 0.015 × 10⁹ /L have significant impacts on prognosis of stage I-III CRC patients.

High Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Poor Prognosis and Clinicopathological Characteristics in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the correlation of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) with prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer.

METHODS

The PubMed and Embase databases were searched. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to summarize disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Odds ratio (OR) was used to summarize tumor clinicopathological characteristics.

RESULTS

High PLR was associated with poor DFS and OS (DFS: HR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.16-1.85, and Tau2 = 0.070; OS: HR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.27-2.80, and Tau2 = 0.192). A Galbraith plot indicated that the studies by Allan et al. and Cihan et al. contributed the heterogeneity of DFS and OS, respectively. There were significant differences in the incidence of high PLR between stage II-IV and stage I groups (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.20-2.90, and Tau2 < 0.001), between lymph node-positive and lymph node-negative groups (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.22-1.91, and Tau2 =0.014), and between metastasis-positive and metastasis-negative groups (OR = 4.24, 95% CI = 2.73-6.59, and Tau2 < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that PLR was associated with poor prognosis of breast cancer and adequately predicted clinicopathological characteristics.

Platelet-lymphocyte ratio acts as an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer

Platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is a hematological parameter which is investigated as a biomarker for prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Due to the controversial results from previous studies, we performed a meta-analysis. Databases of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched to identify eligible studies. STATA version 12.0 was used for statistical analysis. Seven studies with 3,741 patients were ultimately included in this meta-analysis. High PLR was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.07-2.25, p = 0.022) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.3-2.3, p < 0.001) in breast cancer patients. Subgroup analyses disclosed that elevated PLR could predict worse OS in Asian populations and poor DFS in both Asian and non-Asian patients. In addition, PLR remains a significant prognostic marker for OS in patients receiving systemic treatment (HR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.06-2.99, p = 0.03) and patients receiving chemotherapy (HR = 2.82, 95% CI = 1.09-7.26, p = 0.032). High PLR also indicates poor DFS in patients who receive chemotherapy (HR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.47-4.61, p = 0.001), surgery (HR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.12-2.89, p = 0.016) and systemic treatment (HR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.03-4.01, p = 0.042). Moreover, PLR was also in association with HER-2 positivity (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.2-1.83, p < 0.001). In conclusion, this meta-analysis revealed that PLR could serve as an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer.