1
|
Murakami M, Ishikawa H, Sekino Y, Nishiyama H, Suzuki H, Sugahara S, Iizumi T, Mizumoto M, Okumura T, Keino N, Iizumi Y, Hashimoto K, Gosho M, Sakurai H. Moderately hypofractionated proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of a phase II trial. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2024; 65:402-407. [PMID: 38739903 PMCID: PMC11115470 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
The usefulness of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer has been extensively reported, but there are limited studies on proton beam therapy (PBT) using similar hypofractionation schedules. The aim of this prospective phase II study is to confirm the safety of a shortened PBT course using 70 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in 28 fractions. From May 2013 to June 2015, 102 men with localized prostate cancer were enrolled. Androgen deprivation therapy was administered according to risk classification. Toxicity was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Of the 100 patients ultimately evaluated, 15 were classified as low risk, 43 as intermediate risk, and 42 as high risk. The median follow-up time of the surviving patients was 96 months (range: 60-119 months). The 5-year cumulative incidences of grade 2 gastrointestinal/genitourinary adverse events were 1% (95% CI: 0.1-6.9) and 4% (95% CI: 1.5-10.3), respectively; no grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal/genitourinary adverse events were observed. The current study revealed a low incidence of late adverse events in prostate cancer patients treated with moderately hypofractionated PBT of 70 Gy (RBE) in 28 fractions, indicating the safety of this schedule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Motohiro Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Yuta Sekino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
- JCOG Data Center and Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Science, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Hiroyoshi Suzuki
- Department of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura, Chiba, 285-8741, Japan
| | - Shinji Sugahara
- Department of Radiology, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, 3-20-1 Chuuo, Ami-machi, inashiki-gun, Ibaraki, 300-0395, Japan
| | - Takashi Iizumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Okumura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, 6528 Koibuchi, Kasama, Ibaraki, 309-1793, Japan
| | - Naoto Keino
- Tsukuba Clinical Research and Development Organization (T-CReDO), University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Yuichi Iizumi
- Tsukuba Clinical Research and Development Organization (T-CReDO), University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Koichi Hashimoto
- Tsukuba Clinical Research and Development Organization (T-CReDO), University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Masahiko Gosho
- Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pardo-Montero J, Pombar M, Gómez-Caamaño A, Giordanengo S, González-Crespo I. Variation of the relative biological effectiveness with fractionation in proton therapy: Analysis of prostate cancer response. Med Phys 2023; 50:7304-7312. [PMID: 37818904 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In treatment planning for proton therapy a constant Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 is used, disregarding variations with linear energy transfer, clinical endpoint, or fractionation. PURPOSE To present a methodology to analyze the variation of RBE with fractionation from clinical data of tumor control probability (TCP) and to apply it to study the response of prostate cancer to proton therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS We analyzed the dependence of the RBE on the dose per fraction by using the LQ model and the Poisson TCP formalism. Clinical tumor control probabilities for prostate cancer (low and intermediate risk) treated with photon and proton therapy for conventional fractionation (2 Gy(RBE)×37 fractions), moderate hypofractionation (3 Gy(RBE)×20 fractions) and hypofractionation (7.25 Gy(RBE)×5 fractions) were obtained from the literature and analyzed aiming at obtaining the RBE and its dependence on the dose per fraction. RESULTS The theoretical analysis of the dependence of the RBE on the dose per fraction showed three distinct regions with RBE monotonically decreasing, increasing or staying constant with the dose per fraction, depending on the change of (α, β) values between photon and proton irradiation (the equilibrium point being at (αp /βp ) = (αX /βX )(αX /αp )). An analysis of the clinical data showed RBE values that decline with increasing dose per fraction: for low risk RBE≈1.124, 1.119, and 1.102 for 1.82 Gy, 2.73 Gy and 6.59 Gy per fraction (physical proton doses), respectively; for intermediate risk RBE≈1.119 and 1.102 for 1.82 Gy and 6.59 Gy per fraction (physical proton doses), respectively. These values are nonetheless very close to the nominal 1.1 value. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we have presented a methodology to analyze the RBE for different fractionations, and we used it to study clinical data for prostate cancer and evaluate the RBE versus dose per fraction. The analysis shows a monotonically decreasing RBE with increasing dose per fraction, which is expected from the LQ formalism and the changes in (α, β) values between photon and proton irradiation. However, the calculations in this study have to be considered with care as they may be biased by limitations in the modeling assumptions and/or by the clinical data set used for the analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Pardo-Montero
- Group of Medical Physics and Biomathematics, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Department of Medical Physics, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Miguel Pombar
- Department of Medical Physics, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Antonio Gómez-Caamaño
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | - Isabel González-Crespo
- Group of Medical Physics and Biomathematics, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Iizumi T, Ishikawa H, Sekino Y, Tanaka K, Takizawa D, Makishima H, Numajiri H, Mizumoto M, Nakai K, Okumura T, Sakurai H. Acute toxicity and patient-reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer. J Med Radiat Sci 2021; 69:198-207. [PMID: 34664410 PMCID: PMC9163454 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To confirm the feasibility of hypofractionated proton beam therapy (PBT), we compared the acute adverse event rates and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated (2.0 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE)/fraction) PBT. METHODS We reviewed 289 patients with prostate cancer, of whom 73, 100, and 116 patients were treated with 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 Gy (RBE)/fraction, respectively. The endpoints were acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities and the IPSS, evaluated up to 6 months after PBT initiation. RESULTS No significant differences were found in acute toxicity rates or the IPSS among the fractionation schedules. Diabetes mellitus, age, and androgen deprivation therapy were not identified as factors associated with the IPSS. CONCLUSION There were no significant differences in adverse events or quality of life among the three fractionation schedules early after PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Iizumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuta Sekino
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Tsuchiura, Japan
| | - Keiichi Tanaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Tsuchiura, Japan
| | - Daichi Takizawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi Ltd., Hitachi, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Makishima
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Haruko Numajiri
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Kei Nakai
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Okumura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bryant CM, Henderson RH, Nichols RC, Mendenhall WM, Hoppe BS, Vargas CE, Daniels TB, Choo CR, Parikh RR, Giap H, Slater JD, Vapiwala N, Barrett W, Nanda A, Mishra MV, Choi S, Liao JJ, Mendenhall NP. Consensus Statement on Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:1-16. [PMID: 34722807 PMCID: PMC8489490 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00031.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy is a promising but controversial treatment in the management of prostate cancer. Despite its dosimetric advantages when compared with photon radiation therapy, its increased cost to patients and insurers has raised questions regarding its value. Multiple prospective and retrospective studies have been published documenting the efficacy and safety of proton therapy for patients with localized prostate cancer and for patients requiring adjuvant or salvage pelvic radiation after surgery. The Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group (PTCOG) Genitourinary Subcommittee intends to address current proton therapy indications, advantages, disadvantages, and cost effectiveness. We will also discuss the current landscape of clinical trials. This consensus report can be used to guide clinical practice and research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Curtis M. Bryant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Randal H. Henderson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - R. Charles Nichols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - William M. Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Bradford S. Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | | | - C. Richard Choo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Rahul R. Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Huan Giap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jerry D. Slater
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - William Barrett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Akash Nanda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Mark V. Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Seungtaek Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay J. Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nancy P. Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Negoro H, Iizumi T, Mori Y, Matsumoto Y, Chihara I, Hoshi A, Sakurai H, Nishiyama H, Ishikawa H. Chronoradiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Morning Proton Beam Therapy Ameliorates Worsening Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9072263. [PMID: 32708724 PMCID: PMC7408763 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Worsening lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are a frequent adverse event following proton beam therapy (PBT) for localized prostate cancer. We investigated the differences in worsening LUTS among patients who received PBT at different times of day. Participants and Methods: Among 173 patients who underwent PBT for prostate cancer, 168 patients (median age 68.5 years) completed international prostate symptom score (IPSS) questionnaires and were included. Changes in the IPSS from baseline to the end of PBT were assessed by multiple linear regression analysis for age, National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk classification, androgen deprivation therapy, fractional PBT dose, clinical target volume, severity of IPSS, diabetes, LUTS medication use before PBT, anti-coagulant therapy and radiation time of day (morning (08:30–10:30), around noon (10:31–14:30), and late afternoon (14:31–16:30)). Results: IPSS total score and IPSS-Quality of Life (QoL) score (12 patients were excluded due to missing IPSS-QoL score) increased from eight to 14.9 (p < 0.0001) and from two to four (p < 0.0001), respectively. Time of day (morning) was the only determinant for worsening LUTS (β = −0.24, p < 0.01), voiding subscore (β = −0.22, p < 0.05) and IPSS-QoL (β = −0.27, p < 0.005), and was a determinant in item four (urgency) (β = −0.28, p < 0.005) with age (β = 0.19, p < 0.05). Conclusions: Morning PBT for localized prostate cancer significantly ameliorated worsening LUTS and improved QoL compared with treatment around noon or late afternoon. Chronoradiation therapy for localized prostate cancer may be effective and further research to elucidate the underlying mechanism is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiromitsu Negoro
- Department of Urology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-3575, Japan; (I.C.); (A.H.); (H.N.)
- Correspondence: ; Fax: +81-29-853-8854
| | - Takashi Iizumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan; (T.I.); (Y.M.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (H.I.)
| | - Yutaro Mori
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan; (T.I.); (Y.M.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (H.I.)
| | - Yoshitaka Matsumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan; (T.I.); (Y.M.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (H.I.)
| | - Ichiro Chihara
- Department of Urology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-3575, Japan; (I.C.); (A.H.); (H.N.)
| | - Akio Hoshi
- Department of Urology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-3575, Japan; (I.C.); (A.H.); (H.N.)
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan; (T.I.); (Y.M.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (H.I.)
| | - Hiroyuki Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-3575, Japan; (I.C.); (A.H.); (H.N.)
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan; (T.I.); (Y.M.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (H.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Matsubara H, Ezura T, Hashimoto Y, Karasawa K, Nishio T, Tsuneda M. Prediction of radiation‐induced malfunction for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Med Phys 2020; 47:1489-1498. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.14057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2019] [Accepted: 01/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroaki Matsubara
- Department of Radiation Oncology Tokyo Women’s Medical University Tokyo 162‐8666Japan
| | - Takatomo Ezura
- Department of Radiology Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital Tokyo 162‐8666Japan
| | - Yaichiro Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology Tokyo Women’s Medical University Tokyo 162‐8666Japan
| | - Kumiko Karasawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology Tokyo Women’s Medical University Tokyo 162‐8666Japan
| | - Teiji Nishio
- Department of Radiation Oncology Tokyo Women’s Medical University Tokyo 162‐8666Japan
| | - Masato Tsuneda
- Department of Radiation Oncology Tokyo Women’s Medical University Tokyo 162‐8666Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dutz A, Agolli L, Baumann M, Troost EGC, Krause M, Hölscher T, Löck S. Early and late side effects, dosimetric parameters and quality of life after proton beam therapy and IMRT for prostate cancer: a matched-pair analysis. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:916-925. [PMID: 30882264 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1581373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: To compare early and late toxicities, dosimetric parameters and quality of life (QoL) between conventionally fractionated proton beam therapy (PBT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in prostate cancer (PCA) patients. Methods: Eighty-eight patients with localized PCA treated between 2013 and 2017 with either definitive PBT (31) or IMRT (57) were matched using propensity score matching on PCA risk group, transurethral resection of the prostate, prostate volume, diabetes mellitus and administration of anticoagulants resulting in 29 matched pairs. Early and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and QoL based on EORTC-QLQ-C30/PR25 questionnaires were collected prospectively until 12 months after radiotherapy (RT). Associations between toxicities and dose-volume parameters in corresponding organs at risk (OARs) were modeled by logistic regression. Results: There were no significant differences in GI and GU toxicities between both treatment groups except for late urinary urgency, which was significantly lower after PBT (IMRT: 25.0%, PBT: 0%, p = .047). Late GU toxicities and obstruction grade ≥2 were significantly associated with the relative volume of the anterior bladder wall receiving 70 Gy and the entire bladder receiving 60 Gy, respectively. The majority of patients in both groups reported high functioning and low symptom scores for the QoL questionnaires before and after RT. No or little changes were observed for most items between baseline and 3 or 12 months after RT, respectively. Global health status increased more at 12 months after IMRT (p = .040) compared to PBT, while the change of constipation was significantly better at 3 months after PBT compared to IMRT (p = .034). Conclusions: Overall, IMRT and PBT were well tolerated. Despite the superiority of PBT in early constipation and IMRT in late global health status compared to baseline, overall QoL and the risks of early and late GU and GI toxicities were similar for conventionally fractionated IMRT and PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Almut Dutz
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology – OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Linda Agolli
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology – OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Esther G. C. Troost
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology – OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology – OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Tobias Hölscher
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ye G, Guo L, Xing Y, Sun W, Yuan M. Identification of prognostic biomarkers of prostate cancer with long non-coding RNA-mediated competitive endogenous RNA network. Exp Ther Med 2019; 17:3035-3040. [PMID: 30906477 PMCID: PMC6425256 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.7277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most frequently diagnosed male cancer, and no treatments exist for effective inhibition of metastatic spread of PCa. Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) plays key roles in pathogenesis and development of various cancers through competing with endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs), but at present research on lncRNA functions in PCa is still very limited. Hence, this aspect was investigated using bioinformatics methods. Firstly, the functional lncRNA-mediated ceRNA network associated with PCa was constructed by the multi-step computational approach. Then the cytoscape software was used to analyze the node degree and betweenness centrality (BC) value of lncRNAs and mRNAs in the interaction. Finally, the lncRNAs were screened in the central region of the network by the node degree and BC value, and the functional enrichment of mRNAs was evaluated with the Gene Ontology (GO) database. In our results, LINC00476, MALAT1, SNHG11, LINC00649, and ILF3-AS1 are the lncRNAs which have the most nodes and higher BC values and considered as prognostic markers in PCa. GO analysis suggested that the function of screened lncRNAs was obviously focused on intracellular receptor signaling pathway, which indicated these lncRNAs might be potential biomarkers for diagnosis, evaluation and gene-targeted therapy of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guomei Ye
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250033, P.R. China
| | - Liqiang Guo
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250033, P.R. China
| | - Yanfei Xing
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250033, P.R. China
| | - Wendong Sun
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250033, P.R. China
| | - Mingzhen Yuan
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250033, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hoshina RM, Matsuura T, Umegaki K, Shimizu S. A Literature Review of Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer in Japan. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8010048. [PMID: 30621278 PMCID: PMC6352078 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8010048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2018] [Revised: 12/23/2018] [Accepted: 12/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Patients of proton beam therapy (PBT) for prostate cancer had been continuously growing in number due to its promising characteristics of high dose distribution in the tumor target and a sharp distal fall-off. Considering the large number of proton beam facilities in Japan, the further increase of patients undergoing this treatment is due to the emendations by Japanese National Health Insurance (NHI) and the development of medical equipment and technology, it is necessary to know what kind of research and advancements has been done on proton therapy for prostate cancer in the country. For these reasons, this literature review was conducted. The aim of this review is to identify and discuss research studies of proton beam therapy for prostate cancer in Japan. These include observational, interventional, and secondary data analysis of published articles. Method: A literature review on published works related to proton beam therapy for prostate cancer in Japan was conducted using articles that were gathered in the PubMed database of June 2018. We went through abstracts and manuscripts written in English with the keywords ‘proton beam therapy’, ‘prostate cancer’, and ‘Japan’. Results: A total of 23 articles were included. Fourteen articles were observational studies, most of which focused on the adverse effects of Proton Beam Therapy (PBT). Seven articles were interventional studies related on treatment planning, equipment parts, as well as target positioning. Two were secondary data analysis. The included studies were published in 13 different journals by different institutions using various equipment. Conclusion: Despite the favorable results of proton beam therapy, future research should include more patients and longer follow-up schedules to clarify the definitive role of PBT, yet, up to recent retrospective studies, included in this paper, concluded that PBT can be a suitable treatment option for localized prostate cancer. In addition, interventional studies were conducted by several institutions to further embellish proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rika Maglente Hoshina
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Santo Tomas, España, Manila 1002, Philippines.
| | - Taeko Matsuura
- Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
- Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
- Division of Quantum Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan.
| | - Kikuo Umegaki
- Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
- Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
- Division of Quantum Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan.
| | - Shinichi Shimizu
- Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
- Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|