Ranibizumab for eyes previously treated with pegaptanib or bevacizumab without clinical response

A Real-World, Multicenter, 6-Month Prospective Study in Greece of the Effectiveness and Safety of Ranibizumab in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration Who Have Inadequately Responded to Aflibercept: The “ELEVATE” Study

Purpose

Real-world evidence on short-term outcomes of ranibizumab in wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) following inadequate response to aflibercept is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the functional and anatomic effects of switching to ranibizumab in cases of wAMD previously treated with aflibercept with inadequate response.

Patients and Methods

Prospective, observational study performed in eight ophthalmology hospital/private clinics in Greece, enrolling consented patients with active wAMD, ≥50 years-old, who had initiated ranibizumab ≥28 days and <2 months after their last aflibercept injection. Data were collected at enrollment, and at 1, 3 and 6 months post-treatment onset (post-baseline).

Results

Between September-2015 and November-2017, 103 eligible patients (56.3% females; mean age: 74.8±8.6 years) were consecutively enrolled. The age at AMD diagnosis in the study eye was 71.3±8.8 years. Aflibercept (median of 5 injections received over 11.3 months) had been discontinued for anatomical (in 69.9%) and/or functional (38.8%) reasons. At baseline (median: 24.3 months after wAMD diagnosis), choroidal neovascularization was occult in 69.1% of evaluable study eyes; 60.2% of the study eyes had pigment epithelial detachment (PED); 42.7% cysts; 21.4% fibrosis; 66.0% subretinal, and 59.2% intraretinal fluid. At 6 months post-baseline: a median of 3 ranibizumab injections (range: 1–6) had been received; the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)≥0 letter gain rate was 81.8%; the BCVA ≥15 letter gain rate was 17.0%; BCVA gain was 3.2 letters [mean increase: 3.2±10.0 letters; median: 0.0; p = 0.002]; PED greatest basal diameter (GBD; median: 1470.5 μm) also decreased (median decrease: 114.0 μm; p = 0.019). Baseline central retinal thickness (CRT; median: 312.0 μm) remained unchanged. One patient permanently discontinued ranibizumab due to adverse event occurrence, assessed as not causally related to ranibizumab. There were no ranibizumab-related adverse reactions.

Conclusion

Six-month treatment with ranibizumab in aflibercept inadequate responders led to visual acuity and PED GBD improvements, with no statistically significant CRT change.

"What should I inject next?" Challenging treatment decisions in the multiple anti-VEGF: a review of publications exploring anti-VEGF switching for nAMD

PURPOSE

The purpose of our work was to collate information from studies published to date focusing on switching in anti-VEGF therapy and describe the currently available data on anti-VEGF switching in nAMD.

METHODS

A PubMed search of published articles from January 2010 to January 2017 was conducted. Published studies were compared in parameters of sample size, reason for switch, duration of follow-up, and switch outcome (functional and anatomical).

RESULTS

Our search revealed 31 relevant publications. Switching from bevacizumab to ranibizumab mostly resulted in improvement in visual acuity (VA) and anatomical outcomes (CMT, CRT; 7/8 and 6/8 studies, respectively), whereas switching from ranibizumab to bevacizumab was less effective (no VA or anatomical improvement in 2/4 studies). Switching from either agent to aflibercept resulted mostly in improvement of anatomical outcomes (19/21 studies), but rarely in VA improvement (6/21 studies). Not all results were statistically significant, likely due to small sample sizes.

CONCLUSION

Switching anti-VEGF therapy from bevacizumab to ranibizumab might be of benefit (functionally and anatomically) for patients who failed to improve with intravitreal bevacizumab injections, whereas switching from either agent to aflibercept resulted mostly in reduced macular thickness only.

WRINKLED VASCULARIZED RETINAL PIGMENT EPITHELIUM DETACHMENT PROGNOSIS AFTER INTRAVITREAL ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR THERAPY

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is frequently associated with vascularized pigment epithelial detachment (v-PED). We observed a peculiar characteristic of v-PED characterized by small lacy folds of the retinal pigment epithelium, appearing as a wrinkled PED (w-PED) on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Our purpose was to describe the visual prognosis and number of intravitreal injections in w-PED compared with non-w-PED.

METHODS

In this retrospective, case-control series, we reviewed retrospectively medical records of 52 eyes of 51 patients who were consecutively included between November 1 and 30, 2015 with a previous minimum 3-year follow-up. Inclusion criteria were: neovascular age-related macular degeneration, affected with w-PED. Baseline characteristics, best-corrected visual acuity (BVCA), number of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections (anti-VEGF IVT) and maximal recurrence-free interval, that is, without intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection, were analyzed. A w-PED was defined as a v-PED ≥200 μm in height on SD-OCT imaging, presenting with at least 4 small lacy folds on the surface of the retinal pigment epithelium. Patients were compared with a control group, that is, patients harboring PED without wrinkle shape (non-w-PED). All patients had been treated by intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection of either ranibizumab (IVR) or aflibercept (IVA) using a pro re nata (PRN) protocol after three initial monthly treatments, with a minimum of follow-up of 3 years.

RESULTS

Two groups of patients were compared, w-PED (29 eyes, from 29 patients), and non-w-PED (23 eyes from 22 patients). In the w-PED group, mean BCVA evolved from 0.28 (±0.18) log MAR (20/40, range 20/25-20/63) at baseline, to 0.29 (±0.21) log MAR (20/40, range 20/25-20/63) at 1 year (P = 0.41), 0.34 (±0.26) log MAR (20/40, range 20/25-20/80) at 2 years (P = 0.49), 0.35 (±0.28) log MAR (20/40, range 20/25-20/80) at 3 years (P = 0.54). In the non-w-PED group, mean BCVA was 0.40 (±0.28) log MAR (20/50, range 20/25-20/100) at baseline and decreased to 0.48 (±0.46) log MAR (20/63, range 20/20-20/160) at 1 year (P = 0.19), 0.48 (±0.35) log MAR (20/63, range 20/25-20/125) at 2 years (P = 0.02), 0.60 (±0.38) log MAR (20/80, range 20/32-20/200) at 3 years (P = 0.002). In the w-PED group, the mean maximal documented recurrence-free interval was 7.87 (±2.94) months at Year 1, 13.5 (±7.52) at Year 2 and 14.78 (±10.70) at Year 3, versus 4.59 (±2.95) months at Year 1, 7.83 (±6.62) at Year 2, 8.57 (±11.18) at Year 3 in the non-w-PED group (P = 0.0004; 0.0101; 0.0168 respectively at Years 1, 2 and 3).

DISCUSSION

The evolution of v-PED after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection is still difficult to predict despite intense clinical research in this topic. In our study, we noticed that w-PED might be a phenotypic prognosis factor for better visual acuity and longer maximal recurrence-free interval.

The Impact of Switching Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in the Management of Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Switching of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in the management of poorly responsive exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) has had suggested benefits in individual reports that have yet to be consolidated. In this retrospective review, 24 studies published between 2009 and 2014 were identified. Reasons for switching included tachyphylaxis, health insurance coverage, cost issues, and nonresponse or inadequate response. Nine studies had data that could be used for comparison between studies. Median follow-up was 10.6 months (range: 4.2 months to 21.8 months). Mean baseline visual acuity (VA) ranged from 0.42 logMar to 0.94 logMar (standard deviation [SD] range: 0.05 logMar to 0.50 logMar) and mean VA on final follow-up ranged from 0.38 logMar to 0.78 logMar (SD range: 0.08 logMar to 0.50 logMar). Five of nine studies reported no statistically significant change in vision, and five of nine studies reported a statistically significant improvement in central retinal thickness. This review found that switching anti-VEGF did not confer significant improvement of VA, although it provided some anatomical improvement. Pertinent considerations for evaluating response following anti-VEGF therapy are also presented in this review. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017;48:859-869.].

Resistance to anti-VEGF therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a comprehensive review

As a progressive chronic disease, age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible vision impairment worldwide. Experimental and clinical evidence has demonstrated that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a vital role in the formation of choroidal neovascularization. Intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents have been recommended as a first-line treatment for neovascular AMD. However, persistent fluid or recurrent exudation still occurs despite standardized anti-VEGF therapy. Patients suffering from refractory or recurrent neovascular AMD may develop mechanisms of resistance to anti-VEGF therapy, which results in a diminished therapeutic effect. Until now, there has been no consensus on the definitions of refractory neovascular AMD and recurrent neovascular AMD. This article aims at clarifying these concepts to evaluate the efficacy of switching drugs, which contributes to making clinical decision more scientifically. Furthermore, insight into the causes of resistance to anti-VEGF therapy would be helpful for developing possible therapeutic approaches, such as combination therapy and multi-target treatment that can overcome this resistance.

Evaluation of the Response to Ranibizumab Therapy following Bevacizumab Treatment Failure in Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema

Background/Aims

Bevacizumab and ranibizumab are routinely used to treat diabetic macular edema (DME). We aim to evaluate the usefulness of switching to ranibizumab therapy following bevacizumab treatment failure in eyes with DME.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of a consecutive group of patients with DME who received ranibizumab injections following the failure of bevacizumab injections. The injections were delivered following a pro re nata protocol every 4–6 weeks. The data collected included demographics, systemic and ophthalmic findings, as well as the central subfield thickness according to spectral-domain OCT.

Results

Eight eyes (5 patients) were included in the study. The median number of bevacizumab injections prior to the switch to ranibizumab was 4, and the median number of ranibizumab injections during the study was 2. The mean follow-up period was 541 ± 258 days. The mean central retinal thickness (CRT) (±SEM) was 539 ± 75 μm before the initiation of bevacizumab treatment, and 524 ± 43 μm after the last bevacizumab injection (p = 0.7). It reduced to 325 ± 26 μm following the ranibizumab injections (p = 0.0063). The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved in 4 eyes and remained stable in 4 eyes following the ranibizumab injections.

Conclusion

A ranibizumab therapy was effective in reducing the CRT in eyes that failed bevacizumab therapy. A BCVA improvement can also occur in these eyes. Switching between anti-vascular endothelial growth factor compounds may be beneficial in eyes with DME.

Treating the untreatable patient: current options for the management of treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents represent the current standard of care for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Although effective in a majority of cases, a significant proportion of patients have persisting retinal exudation despite regular anti-VEGF therapy. This exudation is considered to produce poorer visual outcomes in these patients. Some of these patients may have misdiagnosed nAMD variants such as polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy; however, the majority of these eyes have what has been termed treatment-resistant nAMD. Currently, the best way to care for these patients is uncertain. Here, we review the evidence for different approaches to the management of treatment-resistant nAMD, including high-dose anti-VEGF therapy, combination regimes and switching of anti-VEGF agents, and discuss possible therapeutic approaches for patients with treatment-resistant nAMD.

Drug-induced uveitis

INTRODUCTION

Drug-induced uveitis is a well described but often overlooked and/or misdiagnosed adverse reaction to medication. There are an increasing number of medications that have been related to the onset of intraocular inflammation. Identification of these inciting agents may decisively help the diagnostic algorithm involving new cases of uveitis.

AREAS COVERED

This review intends to be an updated comprehensive, practical guide for practitioners regarding the main drugs that have been associated with uveitis. A classification proposed by Naranjo et al. in 1981 for establishing potential causality is applied examining possible mechanisms of action. A guide for clinicians about the rationale of these observations when dealing with patients with uveitis is provided.

EXPERT OPINION

Several agents with different routes of administration (systemic, topical and/or intraocular) may cause intraocular inflammation. The mechanism behind ocular inflammation is frequently unknown. Clinicians should be aware of the potential drug effect to optimize diagnosis and management of such patients.

Switching intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes after switching between bevacizumab and ranibizumab therapy due to poor treatment effect in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of patients with neovascular AMD with first treatment using intravitreal bevacizumab (group 1) or ranibizumab (group 2) who switched to the other drug due to poor treatment effect. Primary outcome measures were change in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and mean central retinal thickness (CRT) at 1 year and last visit.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven eyes met the inclusion criteria. In group 1 (43 eyes), the mean BCVA decreased from 20/94 to 20/100 at 1 year after being switched (p = 0.573) and to 20/150 (p = 0.015) at final visit (mean 29.2 months, range 12-53). In group 2 (44 eyes), mean BCVA decreased from 20/72 to 20/90 (p = 0.401) and 20/100 (p = 0.081) at 1 year after switch and at final visit (mean 20.1 months, range 10-40), respectively. The mean CRT at switch, 1 year after switch, and at final visit were 344.4 ± 140 µm (mean ± SD), 286.26 ± 155 µm (p = 0.019), and 290.58 ± 196 µm (p = 0.009) in group 1 and 329.36 ± 144 µm, 302.0 ± 179 µm (p = 0.215), and 309.5 ± 220 µm (p = 0.154) in group 2, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The mean BCVA decreased over time in both groups; however, nearly 30% of the eyes in each group showed vision improvement after switching. Mean CRT decreased in both groups, which was more pronounced after being switched from bevacizumab to ranibizumab. In neovascular AMD, a switch between ranibizumab and bevacizumab can be considered as a further therapy option if poor treatment effect is seen with the initial therapy.

VEGF-binding aptides and the inhibition of choroidal and retinal neovascularization

Age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy are leading causes of blindness. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is known to be the main factor that induces pathological angiogenesis in these diseases. In this study, we investigate the therapeutic potential and safety profiles of high-affinity peptides targeting VEGF which are identified using an 'aptide' technology. We show that two VEGF-binding aptides, APTVEGF1 and APTVEGF2, demonstrate high binding affinity and specificity to VEGF. Furthermore, they suppress VEGF-induced activation of VEGF receptor-2, in vitro angiogenesis, and in vivo pathological choroidal and retinal neovascularization. Despite potent anti-angiogenic effects, both VEGF-binding aptides do not induce any definite toxicity at the level of cellular viability, histological integrity, and gene expression. Our data show the therapeutic potential of VEGF-binding peptides for the treatment of choroidal and retinal neovascularization.

Ocular and systemic safety of bevacizumab and ranibizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This study reviews differences in both ocular and systemic safety between intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab in the setting of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

RECENT FINDINGS

Serious adverse events associated with either bevacizumab or ranibizumab injections are generally rare. However, acute intraocular inflammation (AII) tends to occur more frequently following bevacizumab injection. Systemic absorption of bevacizumab is greater than with ranibizumab, and many studies have shown an increased risk of systemic adverse events in patients receiving bevacizumab compared with those receiving ranibizumab.

SUMMARY

Although rare, adverse events with off-label use of bevacizumab are more common than with ranibizumab. Continued study into long-term safety of the two agents is warranted.