What is the Impact of Frailty on Prescription of Anticoagulation in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Profile of patients with atrial fibrillation treated in internal medicine departments in spain. SUMAMOS-FA-SEMI registry

AIM

To update the profile of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are treated in internal medicine wards according to characteristics implicit in elderly patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Multicenter national registry with one-year follow-up that includes adult patients diagnosed with AF. The sample is divided into three groups based on comorbidity and dependency (group 1, functional patients with little comorbidity; group 2, partially dependent patients with comorbidity; group 3, dependent patients with comorbidity) and their characteristics are described, differentiating between inpatients and outpatients.

RESULTS

1215 subjects were analyzed (mean age 81.5 ± 8.7, with 52.1% women). An increase in comorbidities associated with AF is observed compared to previous analyses in the same setting. There is a high rate of frailty (44.4%), and risk of malnutrition (52.9%) with significant differences between the established groups. An increase in baseline anticoagulant therapy was observed with fewer individuals treated in group 3, and a greater use of direct anticoagulants (62.3%) than anti-vitamin K drugs (22.2%), especially in group 3.

DISCUSSION

The current profile of AF patients treated in internal medicine shows an aged but heterogeneous population with a higher rate of baseline anticoagulant therapy than in previous records with a greater use of direct anticoagulants, especially in the more comorbid and dependent population. We observed a high prevalence of frailty and malnutrition with differences between the established groups. This situation could have implications for establishing differentiated approaches.

Influence of Ageing on the Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Chronically Administered Medicines in Geriatric Patients: A Review

As people age, the efficiency of various regulatory processes that ensure proper communication between cells and organs tends to decline. This deterioration can lead to difficulties in maintaining homeostasis during physiological stress. This includes but is not limited to cognitive impairments, functional difficulties, and issues related to caregivers which contribute significantly to medication errors and non-adherence. These factors can lead to higher morbidity, extended hospital stays, reduced quality of life, and even mortality. The decrease in homeostatic capacity varies among individuals, contributing to the greater variability observed in geriatric populations. Significant pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations accompany ageing. Pharmacokinetic changes include decreased renal and hepatic clearance and an increased volume of distribution for lipid-soluble drugs, which prolong their elimination half-life. Pharmacodynamic changes typically involve increased sensitivity to various drug classes, such as anticoagulants, antidiabetic and psychotropic medications. This review examines the primary age-related physiological changes in geriatrics and their impact on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of medications.

Oral Anticoagulation Choice and Dosage in Very Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Selecting the optimal oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy for elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains challenging. Our real-world study investigates clinical factors guiding OAC prescription patterns and compares outcomes between full- and reduced-dose direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in this demographic.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis of the MISOAC-AF trial focused on hospitalized AF patients aged ≥ 75 years prescribed OAC at discharge. Predictors of VKA and reduced DOAC dosing were identified using adjusted odds ratios (aORs). Cox regression models calculated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for primary (all-cause mortality) and secondary outcomes (stroke, bleeding, AF or heart failure hospitalization, cardiovascular death).

RESULTS

Among 450 elderly patients, 63.6% received DOACs and 36.4% received VKAs. Higher CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores and antiplatelet use predicted VKA prescription. Hypertension, prior stroke, and bleeding history favored DOAC use. Advanced age and chronic kidney disease correlated with reduced DOAC dosing. Over a 3.7-year follow-up period, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the DOAC and VKA groups (aHR 0.79, 95% CI 0.58-1.06) or between the full-dose and reduced-dose DOAC groups (aHR 0.96, 95% CI 0.60-1.53). Secondary analyses also did not yield statistically significant results in either comparison.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical profile parameters in elderly AF patients predict VKA or DOAC use. Clinical outcomes were similar between different OAC therapies.

Frailty prevalence in older adults with atrial fibrillation: A cross-sectional study in a resource-limited setting

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Frailty is a common condition among older adults and is associated with an increased risk of adverse health outcomes, including mortality, disability, dysmobility, falls, and hospitalization. In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), these risks are further exacerbated. However, evidence linking AF and frailty, particularly in the South American context, is limited. This study aimed to assess frailty and other geriatric conditions in older outpatients with atrial fibrillation in a resource-limited setting in Lima, Peru.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we included adults aged 60 years and older diagnosed with atrial fibrillation who were attending outpatient check-ups. Patients who were hospitalized, receiving chemotherapy induction, or presenting with acute infections or exacerbations were excluded. Standardized questionnaires were used to assess frailty, cognitive impairment, and functional dependence. Statistical analysis was performed using R Studio version 4.3.1, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Among the 200 patients who agreed to participate (mean age 74.76 ± 8.42 years, 41% females), 28.5% exhibited frailty, and 46.5% were classified as prefrail. Frailty and prefrailty were significantly associated with older age (p<0.01), female gender (p = 0.01), illiteracy (p<0.01), heart failure (p<0.01), falls (p<0.05), cognitive impairment (p<0.01), and functional dependence (p<0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed significant associations between frailty and cognitive impairment (p<0.05), frailty and functional dependence (p<0.05), and cognitive impairment and functional dependence (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

One-third of older outpatients with atrial fibrillation were identified as frail, while half were classified as prefrail. In this population, frailty frequently coexists with cognitive impairment and functional dependence, highlighting the need for timely screening and the implementation of evidence-based interventions for individuals with atrial fibrillation in resource-limited settings.

Frailty and Cardiovascular Health

The incidence of frailty and cardiovascular disease (CVD) increases as the population ages. There is a bidirectional relationship between frailty and CVD, and both conditions share several risk factors and underlying biological mechanisms. Frailty has been established as an independent prognostic marker in patients with CVD. Moreover, its presence significantly influences both primary and secondary prevention strategies for adults with CVD while also posing a barrier to the inclusion of these patients in pivotal clinical trials and advanced cardiac interventions. This review discusses the current knowledge base on the relationship between frailty and CVD, how managing CVD risk factors can modify frailty, the influence of frailty on CVD management, and future directions for frailty detection and modification in patients with CVD.

Effect of nutritional status on adverse clinical events in elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the influence of nutritional status on adverse clinical events in elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort study included 196 patients, 75-102-years-old, with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, hospitalized in our hospital. The nutritional status was assessed using Mini-Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF). Patients with MNA-SF scores of 0-11 and 12-14 were included in the malnutrition and nonmalnutrition groups, respectively.

RESULTS

The average age of the malnutrition group was higher than that of the nonmalnutrition group, and the levels of body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin (HGB), and albumin (ALB) were significantly lower than those of the nonmalnutrition group, with statistical significance (p < .05). The incidence of all-cause death in the malnutrition group was higher than that in the nonmalnutrition group (p = .007). Kaplan-Meier curve indicated that malnutrition patients have a higher risk of all-cause death (log-rank test, p = .001) and major bleeding events (p = .017). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis corrected for confounders showed that malnutrition was an independent risk factor of all-cause death (HR = 1.780, 95%CI:1.039-3.050, p = .036). The malnutrition group had a significantly high incidence of major bleeding than the nonmalnutrition group (p = .026), and there was no significant difference in the proportion of anticoagulation therapy (p = .082) and the incidence of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (p = .310) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Malnutrition is an independent risk factor of all-cause death in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. The incidence of major bleeding in malnourished elderly patients with atrial fibrillation is high, and the benefit of anticoagulation therapy is not obvious.

Assessment and Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Older Adults with Frailty

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major driver of morbidity and mortality among older adults with frailty. Moreover, frailty is highly prevalent in older adults with AF. Understanding and addressing the needs of frail older adults with AF is imperative to guide clinicians caring for older adults. In this review, we summarize current evidence to support the assessment and management of older adults with AF and frailty, incorporating numerous recent landmark trials and studies in the context of the 2023 US AF guideline.

Impact of frailty on the effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study

AIMS

Data on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) use in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and frailty are scarce. Therefore, the impact of frailty on AF-related outcomes and benefit-risk profiles of NOACs in patients with frailty were investigated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

AF patients initiating anticoagulation between 2013 and 2019 were included using Belgian nationwide data. Frailty was assessed with the Claims-based Frailty Indicator. Among 254 478 anticoagulated AF patients, 71 638 (28.2%) had frailty. Frailty was associated with higher all-cause mortality risks [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.43-1.54)], but not with thromboembolism or bleeding. Among subjects with frailty (78 080 person-years of follow-up), NOACs were associated with lower risks of stroke or systemic embolism (stroke/SE) [aHR 0.77, 95%CI (0.70-0.86)], all-cause mortality [aHR 0.88, 95%CI (0.84-0.92)], and intracranial bleeding [aHR 0.78, 95%CI (0.66-0.91)], a similar major bleeding risk [aHR 1.01, 95%CI (0.93-1.09)], and higher gastrointestinal bleeding risk [aHR 1.19, 95%CI (1.06-1.33)] compared with VKAs. Major bleeding risks were lower with apixaban [aHR 0.84, 95%CI (0.76-0.93)], similar with edoxaban [aHR 0.91, 95%CI (0.73-1.14)], and higher with dabigatran [aHR 1.16, 95%CI (1.03-1.30)] and rivaroxaban [aHR 1.11, 95%CI (1.02-1.21)] compared with VKAs. Apixaban was associated with lower major bleeding risks compared with dabigatran [aHR 0.72, 95%CI (0.65-0.80)], rivaroxaban [aHR 0.78, 95%CI (0.72-0.84)] and edoxaban [aHR 0.74, 95%CI (0.65-0.84)], but mortality risk was higher compared with dabigatran and edoxaban.

CONCLUSION

Frailty was an independent risk factor of death. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants had better benefit-risk profiles than VKAs in patients with frailty, especially apixaban, followed by edoxaban.

Selection of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Based on Patient Profile: Perspectives from Vietnamese Experts. Part 2

Part 1 of this review provided an overview of AF in Vietnam, with a particular focus on primary and secondary stroke prevention. Part 2 explores the management of AF in special, high-risk and clinically common patient populations, including those with renal impairment, diabetes, the elderly, and those with coronary artery disease. Furthermore, Part 2 addresses the challenges posed by patients with AF who have a bioprosthetic valve, a group situated in a grey area of consideration. Managing AF in these patient groups presents unique clinical challenges that require careful consideration. Physicians are tasked with addressing specific clinical questions to identify the optimal anticoagulation strategy for each individual. To inform these decisions, subgroup analyses from pivotal studies are presented alongside real-world data derived from clinical practice. By synthesising available information and considering the nuanced clinical context, the aim is to provide informed perspectives that align with current medical knowledge and contribute to the enhancement of patient care in these challenging scenarios.

Associations of medicine use and ejection fraction with the coexistence of frailty and sarcopenia in a sample of heart failure outpatients: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Frailty and sarcopenia have been extensively studied in heart failure (HF) patients, but their coexistence is unknown. The aim of this work is to describe the coexistence of these conditions in a sample of HF outpatients and its association with the use of medication and left-ventricular ejection fraction.

METHODS

Participants in this cross-sectional study were recruited from a HF outpatients' clinic in northern Portugal. Frailty phenotype was assessed according to Fried et al. Sarcopenia was evaluated according to the revised consensus of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People.

RESULTS

A total of 136 HF outpatients (33.8% women, median age 59 years) integrated this study. Frailty and sarcopenia accounted for 15.4% and 18.4% of the sample, respectively. Coexistence of frailty and sarcopenia was found in 8.1% of the participants, while 17.6% had only one of the conditions. In multivariable analysis (n = 132), increasing age (OR = 1.13;95%CI = 1.06,1.20), being a woman (OR = 65.65;95%CI = 13.50, 319.15), having heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (OR = 5.61; 95%CI = 1.22, 25.76), and using antidepressants (OR = 11.05; 95%CI = 2.50, 48.82), anticoagulants (OR = 6.11; 95%CI = 1.69, 22.07), furosemide (OR = 3.95; 95%CI = 1.07, 14.55), and acetylsalicylic acid (OR = 5.01; 95%CI = 1.10, 22.90) were associated with increased likelihood of having coexistence of frailty and sarcopenia, while using statins showed the inverse effect (OR = 0.06; 95%CI = 0.01, 0.30).

CONCLUSIONS

The relatively low frequency of coexistence of frailty and sarcopenia signifies that each of these two conditions still deserve individual attention from health professionals in their clinical practice and should be screened separately. Being a woman, older age, having HFpEF, using anticoagulants, antidepressants, loop diuretics and acetylsalicylic acid, and not using statins, were associated with having concomitant frailty and sarcopenia. These patients can potentially benefit from interventions that impact their quality of life such as nutritional and mental health interventions and exercise training.

Initiation of oral anticoagulation in US older adults newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation during hospitalization

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is a common cause of stroke among older adults and is often first detected during hospitalization, given frequent use of cardiac telemetry.

METHODS

In a 20% national sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, we identified patients aged 65-or-older newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation while hospitalized in 2016. Our primary outcome was an oral anticoagulant claim within 7-days of discharge. Multivariable logistic regression analyses assessed relationships between anticoagulation initiation and thromboembolic and bleeding risk scores while controlling for demographics, frailty, comorbidities, and hospitalization characteristics.

RESULTS

Among 38,379 older adults newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation while hospitalized (mean age 78.2 [SD 8.4]; 51.8% female; 83.3% white), 36,633 (95.4%) had an indication for anticoagulation and 24.6% (9011) of those initiated an oral anticoagulant following discharge. Higher CHA2 DS2 -VASc score was associated with a small increase in oral anticoagulant initiation (predicted probability 20.5% [95% CI, 18.7%-22.3%] for scores <2 and 24.9% [CI, 24.4%-25.4%] for ≥4). Elevated HAS-BLED score was associated with a small decrease in probability of anticoagulant initiation (25.4% [CI, 24.4%-26.4%] for score <2 and 23.1% [CI, 22.5%-23.8%] for ≥3). Frailty was associated with decreased likelihood of oral anticoagulant initiation (24.7% [CI, 23.2%-26.2%] for non-frail and 18.1% [CI, 16.6%-19.6%] for moderately-severely frail). Anticoagulant initiation varied by primary reason for hospitalization, with predicted probability highest among patients with a primary diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (46.1% [CI, 45.0%-47.3%]) and lowest among those with non-cardiovascular conditions (13.8% [CI, 13.3%-14.3%]) and bleeds (3.6% [CI, 2.4%-4.8%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral anticoagulant initiation is uncommon among older adults newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation during hospitalization, even among patients hospitalized primarily for atrial fibrillation and patients with high thromboembolic risk. Clinicians should discuss risks and benefits of oral anticoagulants with all inpatients found to have atrial fibrillation.

A retrospective analysis of frailty status on atrial fibrillation catheter ablation outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces symptoms and improves the quality of life compared with medical treatment. It is unclear if frailty impacts on the outcome of catheter ablation in patients with symptomatic AF. We sought to evaluate the association between frailty as measured by the validated NHS electronic Frailty Index (eFI) and outcomes post-AF ablation.

METHODS

Two hundred forty eight patients who had undergone AF ablation with a mean age of 72.9 ± 5.16 were included in the study retrospectively. The primary endpoint for success was defined as freedom from atrial arrhythmia lasting >30 s beyond the 3-month blanking periods. Frailty was based on the eFI, and the cohort split into four groups: fit (no frailty), mild, moderate and severe frailty.

RESULTS

Frailty was categorized as fit (118/248; 47.6%), mild (66/248; 26.6%), moderate (54/248; 21.8%), and severe (10/248; 4.0%). Freedom from arrhythmia occurred in 167 of 248 (67.3%) patients after a mean follow-up of 25.8 +/- 17.3 months. Fit patients had significantly greater freedom from arrhythmia (92/118; 78%) compared to mild frailty (40/66; 60.6%, p-value = .020), moderate frailty (31/54; 57.4%, p-value = .006), or severe frailty (4/10; 40.0%, p-value < .001). There was also a significant difference in arrhythmia occurrence between patients with mild frailty and severe frailty (p-value = .044).

CONCLUSION

Frailty is associated with poorer outcomes in patients undergoing AF ablation. The eFI may be used in the prognostic evaluation of AF ablation outcomes. Further studies are essential to confirm the findings of this study.

Association of CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED to frailty and frail outcomes: From the TREAT-AF study

BACKGROUND

Morbidity and mortality associated with high CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED scores is not specific to atrial fibrillation (AF). Frailty could be an important contributor to this morbidity and mortality while being mechanistically independent from AF. We sought to evaluate the association of stroke and bleeding risk to noncardiovascular frail events and the association of stroke prevention therapy to outcomes in frail patients with AF.

METHODS

Using the TREAT-AF (The Retrospective Evaluation and Assessment of Therapies in AF) study from the Veterans Health Administration, we identified patients with newly diagnosed AF from 2004 to 2014. Baseline frailty was identified using a previously validated claims-based index requiring ≥2 of 12 ICD-9 diagnoses. Logistic regressions modeled the association between CHA₂DS₂-VASc and modified HAS-BLED and frailty. Cox proportional hazard regressions were used to evaluate the association between CHA₂DS₂-VASc and modified HAS-BLED and a composite of noncardiovascular frail events (fractures, urinary tract infections, bacterial pneumonia, or dehydration). We also evaluated the association of oral anticoagulant (OAC) use with stroke, bleeding, and 1-year mortality in frail patients and non-frail patients.

RESULTS

In 213,435 patients (age 70 ± 11; 98% male; CHA₂DS₂-VASc 2.4 ± 1.7) with AF, 8,498 (4%) were frail. CHA₂DS₂-VASc > 0 and HAS-BLED > 0 were strongly associated with frailty (odds ratio [OR] 13.3 (95% CI: 11.6-15.2) for CHA₂DS₂-VASc 4+ and OR 13.4 (10.2-17.5) for HAS-BLED 3+). After adjusting for covariates, CHA₂DS₂-VASc, and HAS-BLED > 0 were associated with higher risk of non-cardiovascular frail events (hazard ratio [HR] 2.1 (95% CI: 2.0-2.2) for CHA₂DS₂-VASc 4+ and HR 1.4 (95% CI: 1.3-1.5) for HAS-BLED 3+). In frail patients, OAC use was associated with significantly lower risk of 1-year mortality (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.72-0.94, P = .0031) but did not reach significance for risk of stroke (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.55-1.18, P = .26) or major bleeding (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.93-1.25, P = .34).

CONCLUSIONS

High CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED scores are strongly associated with frailty. However, in frail patients, OAC use was associated with reduction in 1-year mortality. For this challenging clinical population with competing risks of frailty and frail events, focused prospective studies are needed to support clinical decision-making. Until then, careful evaluation of frailty should inform shared decision-making.

Managing older people with atrial fibrillation and preventing stroke: a review of anticoagulation approaches

INTRODUCTION

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are the cornerstone of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), but prescribing decisions in older people are complicated. Clinicians must assess the net clinical benefit of OAC in the context of multiple chronic conditions, polypharmacy, frailty and life expectancy. The under-representation of high-risk, older adult sub-populations in clinical trials presents the challenge of choosing the right OAC, where a 'one-size-fits-all' approach cannot be taken.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses OAC approaches for stroke prevention in older people with AF and presents a prescribing aid to support clinicians' decision-making. High-risk older adults with multiple chronic conditions, specifically chronic kidney disease, dementia/cognitive impairment, previous stroke/transient ischemic attack or intracranial hemorrhage, polypharmacy, frailty, low body weight, high falls risk, and those aged ≥75 years are considered.

EXPERT OPINION

Non-vitamin K antagonist OACs are the preferred first-line OAC in older adults with AF, including high-risk subpopulations, after individual assessment of stroke and bleeding risk, except those with mechanical heart valves and moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis. Head-to-head comparisons of NOACs are not available, therefore the choice of drug (and dose) should be based on an individual's risk (stroke and bleeding) and incorporate their treatment preferences. Treatment decisions must be person-centered and principles of shared decision-making applied.

Frailty and oral anticoagulant prescription in adults with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of frailty in the context of atrial fibrillation (AF); to identify the most commonly used frailty instruments in AF; and to describe the effect of frailty on non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) prescription for stroke prevention in adults with AF.

Methods

A systematic search of databases, including Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and CINAHL, was conducted using search terms including "atrial fibrillation," "frailty," and "anticoagulation." A narrative synthesis was undertaken.

Results

A total of 92 articles were screened, and 12 articles were included. The mean age of the participants (n = 212,111) was 82 years (range = 77-85 years) with 56% of participants identified as frail and 44% identified non-frail. A total of five different frailty instruments were identified: the Frailty Phenotype (FP; n = 5, 42%), the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS; n = 4, 33%), Cumulative Deficit Model of Frailty (CDM; n = 1, 8%), Edmonton Frail Scale (n = 1, 8%) and the Resident Assessment Instrument - Minimum Data Set (RAI-MDS 2.0; n = 1, 8%). Frailty was identified as an important barrier to anticoagulant therapy with 52% of the frail population anticoagulated vs 67% non-frail.

Conclusion

Frailty is an important consideration in anticoagulation decision making for stroke prevention in patients with AF. There is scope to improve frailty screening and treatment. Frailty status is an important risk marker and should be considered when evaluating stroke risk alongside congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke, transient ischemic attack, or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category (CHA2DS2-VASc) and Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding, Labile, Elderly, and Drugs (HAS-BLED) scores.

Retrospective Cross-sectional Analysis of Older Adults Living with Frailty and Anticoagulant Use for Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is recommended for most individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF), including those who are frail. Based on previous literature, those who are frail may be less likely to be prescribed OAC, and up to one-third may receive an inappropriate dose if prescribed a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). The objectives of this study were to determine the proportion of frail ambulatory older adults with AF who are prescribed OAC, compare the rates of OAC use across the frailty spectrum, assess the appropriateness of DOAC dosing, and identify if frailty and geriatric syndromes impact OAC prescribing patterns.

Methods

Retrospective cross-sectional review of individuals with AF referred to an ambulatory clinic for older adults living with frailty and/or geriatric syndromes. Rockwood clinical frailty score of ≥4 was used to define frailty and DOAC appropriateness was assessed based on the Canadian Cardiovascular Society AF guidelines.

Results

Two hundred and ten participants were included. The mean age was 84 years, 49% were female and the median frailty score was 5. Of the 185 participants who were frail, 82% were prescribed an OAC (83% with frailty score of 4, 85% with a frailty score of 5, and 78% with a frailty score of 6). Of those prescribed a DOAC, 70% received a guideline-approved dose.

Conclusions

Over 80% of ambulatory older adults with frailty and AF were prescribed an OAC. However, of those prescribed a DOAC, 30% received an unapproved dose, suggesting more emphasis should be placed on initial and ongoing dosage selection.

Association between body mass index and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation taking oral anticoagulants

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The association between body mass index (BMI) and clinical outcomes of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) taking oral anticoagulants (OACs) are controversial, and we thus analyzed the large registry data to elucidate them.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a historical cohort study at 71 centers in Japan and included outpatients with NVAF taking vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Physicians in charge could change VKAs to direct OACs based on their judgement during follow-up period. We categorized patients into four BMI groups (kg/m²): underweight (BMI < 18.5), normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25), overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30), and obese (30 ≤ BMI). The effects of each BMI group relative to the normal weight group on clinical outcomes consisting of all-cause death, ischemic events, and bleeding events were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for potential confounders. We also constructed restricted cubic spline regression model adjusted by multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. We included 6927 patients consisting of an underweight (n = 386), normal weight (n = 3785), overweight (n = 2174), and obese (n = 582) groups. The median follow-up period was 3.9 years. In the underweight group, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause death and ischemic events were 1.75 (1.30-2.34) and 1.61 (1.04-2.50). The HR for all-cause death was 0.63 (0.49-0.82) in the overweight group. Restricted cubic spline regression models confirmed that lower BMI showed significantly higher risks for all-cause death and ischemic events.

CONCLUSION

Among NVAF patients taking OACs, underweight patients had higher risks of all-cause death and ischemic events than other patients. Overweight patients had lower risk of all-cause death.

Prevalence and treatment of atrial fibrillation in older adults

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent cardiac arrhythmia with an impact on morbidity and mortality found in the geriatric population.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study is the first to investigate the prevalence, treatment and comorbidities of AF in a large cohort of older adults.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Older adults with AF hospitalized between 2010 and 2018. The mean age of the 10,700 AF patients in 2018 was 83.2 ± 6.4 years. The frequency of anticoagulation in older adults with AF between 2010 and 2018 was analyzed. The relationship between comorbidities and anticoagulation in 2018 was examined. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify possible predictive factors for anticoagulation.

RESULTS

The prevalence of AF in 35,887 hospitalized older adults was 29.8% in 2018. The mean CHA₂DS₂VASc score was 4.4 ± 1.3 (male 3.8 ± 1.3, female 4.7 ± 1.2). From 2010 to 2018, the frequency of anticoagulation for patients with AF rose from 32.1% to 64.2%. Statistically significant differences in the examined characteristics between anticoagulated and not anticoagulated patients were found. Furthermore, there were no predictive factors for anticoagulation in multivariate logistic analysis.

CONCLUSION

Hospitalized older adults have an increased prevalence of AF compared to the general population. Despite the higher risk of bleeding, older adults were more frequently anticoagulated in the observation period, preferably with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Patients without anticoagulation had more diagnoses and were worse in functional tests. This study suggests that the decision to give anticoagulants to older adults should be personalized.

Use of Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study in Spain

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have substantially improved anticoagulation. However, data on NOAC use among elderly patients are scarce. We sought to describe NOAC use among elderly AF patients in Spain. We performed a non-interventional, multicenter, multispecialty, cross-sectional study in elderly (≥75 years) AF patients treated with NOACs for stroke prevention. Patients' characteristics by NOAC treatment were compared using standardized differences (SDD). NOAC dosing was classified according to the Spanish summary of products characteristics (SmPC) into appropriate (recommended dose) and inappropriate (under and overdosed). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to explore factors associated with inappropriate dosing. 500 patients were included. Mean (SD) age was 81.5 (4.7) years, and 50% were women. Mean (SD) creatinine clearance was 57.4 mL/min (18.8), and 23.6% were frail. Dabigatran treatment totaled 38.4%, rivaroxaban 15.2%, apixaban 33.2%, and edoxaban 13.2%. Almost one-fourth of elderly patients treated with NOACs in Spain were inappropriately dosed (underdosing 14.4% and overdosing 9.6%). Underdosing was significantly associated with weight (OR = 1.03, 95%CI = 1.0-1.1), while higher a EHRA score decreased the risk of underdosing (OR = 0.47, 95%CI = 0.2-1.0). Overdosing was significantly associated with a history of ischemic stroke (OR = 2.95, 95%CI = 1.1-7.7). Addressing incorrect dosing among elderly AF patients is relevant to improve patient outcomes.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Special Populations: Beyond the Clinical Trials

Currently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the first-line anticoagulant strategy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). They are characterized by a more favorable pharmacological profile than warfarin, having demonstrated equal efficacy in stroke prevention and greater safety in terms of intracranial bleeding. The study population in the randomized trials of DOACs was highly selected, so the results of these trials cannot be extended to specific populations such as obese, elderly, frail, and cancer patients, which, on the other hand, are sub-populations widely represented in clinical practice. Furthermore, due to the negative results of DOAC administration in patients with mechanical heart valves, the available evidence in subjects with biological heart valves is still few and often controversial. We sought to review the available literature on the efficacy and safety of DOACs in elderly, obese, underweight, frail, cancer patients, and in patients with bioprosthetic heart valves with NVAF to clarify the best anticoagulant strategy in these special and poorly studied subpopulations.

Oral Anticoagulant Use and Appropriateness in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Complex Clinical Conditions: ACONVENIENCE Study

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is the most common arrhythmia in older patients. Although direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are the antithrombotic treatment of choice, irrespective of age, certain factors may limit their use. The aim of the ACONVENIENCE study was to consult the opinion of a multidisciplinary panel of experts on the appropriateness of using OACs in elderly patients (>75 years) with NVAF associated with certain complex clinical conditions. A consensus project was performed on the basis of a systematic review of the literature, and application of a two-round Delphi survey. The agreement of 79 panellists on 30 Delphi-type statements was evaluated, and their opinion on the appropriateness of different oral anticoagulants in 16 complex clinical scenarios was assessed. A total of 27 consensus statements were agreed upon, including all statements addressing anticoagulation in older patients and in patients at high risk of bleeding complications, and most of those addressing frailty, dementia, risk of falling, and complex cardiac situations. It was almost unanimously agreed upon that advanced age should not influence the anticoagulation decision. Apixaban was the highest-rated therapeutic option in 14/16 situations, followed by edoxaban. There is a high degree of agreement on anticoagulation in older patients with NVAF. Age should not be the single limiting factor when prescribing OACs, and the decision should be made based on net clinical benefit and a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Apixaban, followed by edoxaban, was considered the most appropriate treatment in the various complex clinical situations examined.

Outcomes and Safety of Very-Low-Dose Edoxaban in Frail Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in the ELDERCARE-AF Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) increases with age and is more common in frail patients. However, data are lacking on outcomes of oral anticoagulants (OACs) in very elderly patients with AF with frailty, who are ineligible for standard anticoagulant treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To compare very-low-dose edoxaban (15 mg daily) vs placebo across frailty status, including each of 5 frailty assessment parameters, among patients with AF involved in the ELDERCARE-AF (Edoxaban Low-Dose for Elder Care Atrial Fibrillation Patients) trial.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This is a cohort study using data from ELDERCARE-AF, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of Japanese patients with AF aged 80 years or older who were ineligible for OACs at doses approved for stroke prevention because of their high bleeding risks. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive edoxaban or placebo. The study duration was from August 5, 2016, to November 5, 2019, with the last patient followed up on December 27, 2019. Data analysis was performed from February 2021 to February 2022.

EXPOSURE

Edoxaban (15 mg) once daily or placebo.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary efficacy end point was the composite of stroke or systemic embolism, and the primary safety end point was major bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of 984 patients were randomly assigned to treatment (492 each to the edoxaban and placebo groups); 944 patients (402 frail patients [42.6%]; 542 nonfrail patients [57.4%]; mean [SD] age, 86.6 [4.3] years; 541 women [57.3%]) were included in this analysis. In the placebo group, the estimated event rates (SE) for stroke or systemic embolism were 7.1% (1.6%) per patient-year in the frail group and 6.1% (1.3%) per patient-year in the nonfrail group. Edoxaban was associated with lower event rates for stroke or systemic embolism with no interaction with frailty status or frailty assessment parameters. Major bleeding and major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events were both numerically higher in the edoxaban group than in the placebo group, and no heterogeneity was observed with frailty status. Although both all-cause death and net clinical composite outcome occurred more frequently in the frail group than in the nonfrail group, there was no association with frailty status between the edoxaban and placebo groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Regardless of frailty status, among Japanese patients with AF aged 80 years or older who were ineligible for standard OACs, once-daily 15-mg edoxaban was associated with reduced incidence of stroke or systemic embolism and may be a suitable treatment option for these patients.

Frailty Syndrome in Older Adults with Cardiovascular Diseases-What Do We Know and What Requires Further Research?

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) affect 60% of people over 60 years of age and are one of the main causes of death in the world. Diagnosed cardiovascular disease also triples the likelihood of Frailty syndrome (FS). FS has become increasingly relevant in cardiology and cardiac surgery and occurs in a significant number of patients with CVD, with prevalence ranging from 25% to 62%. Viewed in a multidimensional, biopsychosocial perspective, FS increases a patient's vulnerability, making them susceptible to several adverse clinical outcomes. Frailty syndrome also is a predictor of mortality in patients with CVD regardless of age, severity of disease, multi-morbidity, and disability. Frailty syndrome potentially can be prevented in patients with CVD and its early identification is important to avoid the development of disability, dependence on others and reduced quality of life. The aim of this paper is to show the relationship between FS and specific CVDs (coronary artery disease, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, heart failure) and cardiac procedures (device implantation, cardiac surgery, and transcatheter aortic valve implantation). Furthermore, we highlight those areas that require further research to fully understand the relationship between FS and CVD and to be able to minimize or prevent its adverse effects.

Impact of frailty on all-cause mortality and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Conflicting results have been reported on the impact of frailty on adverse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of frailty on death and major bleeding in patients with AF.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched PubMed and Embase databases until June 30, 2021 for the relevant studies that investigated the impact of frailty on all-cause mortality and major bleeding in AF patients. Pooled multivariable-adjusted risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) was estimated for the frail vs. nonfrail patients using a random-effect model.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 97,413 patients with AF satisfied the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of frailty in patients with AF ranged between 5.9% and 89.5%. Meta-analysis indicated that frailty was associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality (RR 2.77; 95% CI 1.68-4.57) and major bleeding (RR 1.83; 95% CI 1.24-2.71). Subgroup analysis showed that the impact of frailty on all-cause mortality was consistently found in each subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Frailty independently predicts all-cause mortality and major bleeding in patients with AF. Determination of frailty status may play an important role in risk classification of AF patients. However. lack of standardized definition of frailty is the most important limitations of this meta-analysis.

Antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation who survive an intracerebral haemorrhage: results of an EHRA survey

The aim of this survey is to provide a snapshot of current practice regarding antithrombotic therapy (ATT) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) comorbid with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). An online survey was distributed to members of the European Heart Rhythm Association. A total of 163 clinicians responded, mostly cardiologists or electrophysiologists (87.7%), predominantly working in University hospitals (61.3%). Most respondents (47.2%) had seen one to five patients with AF comorbid with ICH in the last 12 months. Among patients sustaining an ICH on oral anticoagulation (OAC), 84.3% respondents would consider some form of ATT post-ICH, with 73.2% preferring to switch from a vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) to a non-VKA oral anticoagulant (NOAC) and 37.2% preferring to switch from one NOAC to another. Most (36.6%) would restart OAC >30 days post-ICH. Among patients considered unable to take OAC, left atrial appendage occlusion procedure was the therapy of choice in 73.3% respondents. When deciding on ATT, respondents considered patient's CHA2DS2-VASc score, ICH type, demographics, risk factors, and patient adherence. The main reason for not restarting or commencing ATT was concern about recurrent ICH (80.8%). National or international clinical guidelines would be advantageous to support decision-making (84.3%). Other helpful resources reported were multidisciplinary team involvement (46.9%) and patient education (82%). In summary, most survey respondents would prescribe OAC therapy for patients with AF who have sustained an ICH on OAC and would restart OAC >30 days post-ICH. The risk of recurrent ICH was the main reason for not prescribing any ATT post-ICH.

Acute heart failure in elderly patients: a review of invasive and non-invasive management

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a major cause of unplanned hospitalisations in the elderly and is associated with high mortality. Its prevalence has grown in the last years due to population aging and longer life expectancy of chronic heart failure patients. Although international societies have provided guidelines for the management of AHF in the general population, scientific evidence for geriatric patients is often lacking, as these are underrepresented in clinical trials. Elderly have a different risk profile with more comorbidities, disability, and frailty, leading to increased morbidity, longer recovery time, higher readmission rates, and higher mortality. Furthermore, therapeutic options are often limited, due to unfeasibility of invasive strategies, mechanical circulatory support and cardiac transplantation. Thus, the in-hospital management of AHF should be tailored to each patient's clinical situation, cardiopulmonary condition and geriatric assessment. Palliative care should be considered in some cases, in order to avoid unnecessary diagnostics and/or treatments. After discharge, a strict follow-up through outpatient clinic or telemedicine is can improve quality of life and reduce rehospitalisation rates. The aim of this review is to offer an insight on current literature and provide a clinically oriented, patient-tailored approach regarding assessment, treatment and follow-up of elderly patients admitted for AHF.

Non-adherence to Thromboprophylaxis Guidelines in Atrial Fibrillation: A Narrative Review of the Extent of and Factors in Guideline Non-adherence

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia. It increases the risk of thromboembolism by up to fivefold. Guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations to effectively mitigate thromboembolic events using oral anticoagulants while minimizing the risk of bleeding. This review focuses on non-adherence to contemporary guidelines and the factors associated with guideline non-adherence. The extent of guideline non-adherence differs according to geographic region, healthcare setting, and risk stratification tools used. Guideline adherence has gradually improved over recent years, but a significant proportion of patients are still not receiving guideline-recommended therapy. Physician-related and patient-related factors (such as patient refusals, bleeding risk, older age, and recurrent falls) also contribute to guideline non-adherence, especially to undertreatment. Quality improvement initiatives that focus on undertreatment, especially in the primary healthcare setting, may help to improve guideline adherence.

Does Chronic Kidney Disease Have an Impact on the Use of Oral Anticoagulants after Stroke? An Observational Follow-Up Study

INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease is common in patients with acute ischemic stroke. We investigated whether chronic kidney disease has an impact on anticoagulation treatment recommendations after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) related with atrial fibrillation (AF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We extracted treatment-related data concerning stroke/TIA patients with AF and available estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) from a monocentric prospective German stroke registry. Chronic kidney disease was defined as eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Using uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses, we investigated whether chronic kidney disease was associated with a lower probability to be treated with anticoagulation early after stroke.

RESULTS

A total of 273 patients entered the analysis. In 242 AF patients (88.6%), oral anticoagulation was recommended after stroke. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, chronic kidney disease was not identified as an independent factor for the decision against anticoagulation (OR 1.63, 95% CI: 0.50-5.31, p = 0.421); only increasing age (OR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.00-1.21, p = 0.061) and a modified Rankin Scale >3 at discharge (OR 3.41, 95% CI: 0.88-13.24, p = 0.077) showed a nonsignificant trend for the decision to omit anticoagulation. A total of 155 of 167 patients (92.8%) were still anticoagulated at follow-up. A total of 44 patients with chronic kidney disease completed follow-up, and of those, 37 were still anticoagulated (84%). In patients without chronic kidney disease, 118/167 (70.7%) had continued anticoagulation (p = 0.310).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that chronic kidney disease was not the main factor in the decision to withhold oral anticoagulation in patients with recent stroke/TIA and AF.

Outcomes of anticoagulant prescribing for older patients with atrial fibrillation depends on disability level provided by long-term care insurance

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients aged ≥75 is one of the major risk factors for stroke, and prescription of oral anticoagulants (OACs) should be considered in these patients. We investigated the use of OAC' for patients certificated for long-term care (LTC) insurance, who have a high risk of bleeding among older patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From 1169 consecutive inpatients aged 75 or older who were admitted to the geriatric ward of The University of Tokyo Hospital between 2012 and 2017, we identified 175 patients (men 48%, mean age 85.5 years) who had AF during admission. The patients' background, prescription of OACs on discharge, and the level of LTC insurance were checked. Patients were followed up for 1 to 5 years. Major bleeding, stroke, and all-cause mortality were investigated as outcomes. Among patients with AF, 63.4% were taking OACs. In multivariate analysis, older age, low BMI and no history of stroke were significant factors for not prescribing OACs. Care level patients with OACs had a higher incidence of stroke than others. There was no difference, irrespective of OAC prescription and disability level, in incidence of major bleeding. Care level patients without OACs had higher mortality than others.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that older care level patients with AF may benefit less from OACs.

Electrophysiology studies for predicting atrioventricular block in patients with syncope: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Syncope may be caused by intermittent complete heart block in patients with bundle branch block. Electrophysiology studies (EPS) testing for infra-Hisian heart block are recommended by the European Society of Cardiology syncope guidelines on the basis of decades-old estimates of their negative predictive values (NPVs) for complete heart block.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the NPV of EPS for complete heart block in patients with syncope and bundle branch block.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL without language restriction from database inception to October 2019 for Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords related to "syncope," "heart block," and "programmed electrical stimulation." A random effects meta-analysis was conducted with a primary outcome of the proportion of patients with a negative EPS who later presented with complete heart block, diagnosed with surface electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings vs continuous implantable cardiac monitor (ICM).

RESULTS

Ten reports contained 12 cohorts with 639 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 69 ± 7 years; 35% ± 10% were women; and 85% of patients had bifascicular block. Seven cohorts recorded clinical outcomes with external ECG recordings, and 5 cohorts featured ICMs. The mean prespecified His-to-ventricle interval criterion was ≥70 ms. In studies featuring surface ECG recordings, there were 7% (95% confidence interval 7%-17%) patients who developed complete heart block compared with 29% (95% confidence interval 24%-35%) in the studies featuring ICM (P = .0001).

CONCLUSION

The NPV of EPS in patients with syncope and bundle branch block is 0.71, sufficiently low to question its use.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant use at doses inappropriately lower than recommended in outpatient older adults: a real-life data

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

There has been a rapid increase in the use of non-vitamin K-antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC). Current guidelines recommend dose adjustments be made in accordance with certain criteria for each NOAC. This study is aimed at determining whether or not NOAC were prescribed for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) in guideline-recommended doses in community-dwelling older adults.

METHODS

Older adults taking NOAC for non-valvular AF presenting to a cardiology outpatient clinic for the first time were included in the study. The NOAC dose for each patient was assessed based on the recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology and were categorized as appropriate or inappropriate (low or high dose). The patients were also evaluated for demographic data, diseases, CHA2DS2-VASc score, HASBLED score, frailty and falls in the previous year.

RESULTS

A total of 302 older adults were included in the study, with a mean age of 75.5 ± 7.5 years. One hundred eighty-four patients (60.9%) were found to be on appropriate doses of NOAC, while 109 (36.1%) were on inappropriately low doses and nine (2.98%) were on inappropriately high doses. Accordingly, 39.1% of the AF patients were found to be on inappropriate doses of NOAC, 92.4% of which were inappropriately low. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the only factor associated with inappropriate low-dose NOAC use was patient age (OR = 1.061, 95% CI = 1.009-1.116, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that the inappropriate use of lower dose NOAC may emerge as a significant problem in outpatient older adults. This inappropriate practice seems to be associated with older age rather than the diseases, CHA2DS2-VASc/HASBLED scores, frailty and presence of falls.

Thromboembolism in Older Adults

Arterial and venous thromboembolism are both more common in older adults. The use of anticoagulants, the mainstay to prevent thromboembolism, requires consideration of the balance between risk and benefit. Such consideration is even more important in the very elderly in whom the risk of anticoagulant-related bleeding and thrombosis are higher. This review will focus on the challenges of implementing and managing anticoagulant therapy in older patients in an era when the options for anticoagulants include not only vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), but also direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

Anticoagulant Therapy for Frail Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) increases with age, as does the proportion of patients with frailty. AF patients with frailty have a higher risk of stroke than those without frailty, and progressive frailty caused by stroke is also associated with a worse prognosis. Despite this, anticoagulant therapy tends to not be used in frail patients because of the risk of falls and bleeding complications. However, some studies have shown that anticoagulant therapy improves the prognosis in patients with frailty. An accurate assessment of the "net-clinical-benefits" is needed in patients with frailty, with the aim of improving the prognoses of patients with frailty by selecting those who will benefit from anticoagulant therapy and actively reducing the risk of bleeding. A comprehensive intervention that includes a team of doctors and social resources is required. We herein review the effectiveness and bleeding risk associated with anticoagulant therapy in frail patients investigated in clinical studies.

Association between falls and cardiovascular diseases in the geriatric population

Objective

To determine the association of cardiovascular diseases with falls in the geriatric population.

Methods

Original, Transversal and analytical study. Elderly patients who attend the external consultation of the Geriatrics service, older than 65 years, with falls history, perform comprehensive geriatric assessment to indentify causes of falls in the period from March 2018 to June 2019. We perform measures of central tendency, chi-square test X2 for qualitative variables, we performed linear regression model.

Results

A total of 669 patients were included, the analysis shows association with frailty [OR 1.65 (95% CI 1.37-3.77), p <0.05], Heart Failure [OR 1.02, (95% CI, 0.68 - 1.54), p < 0.05 ], the logistic regression analysis with the variables (Fragility, SAH, es: DM2, AMI, Stroke, AF, postural hypotensive syncope, Hypothyroidism, Dyslipidemia, and HF) shows that the probability of falling is 57%.

Conclusion

Cardiovascular diseases have a high prevalence in the population studied and increase the risk of falls. Individually analyzed cardiovascular diseases do not show an association with the syndrome of falls in the elderly, except for frailty, which proved to be an independent factor that increases the risk of falls with an OR 1.65. When analyzing them together, the risk of falling increases up to 57%. It is necessary to correctly identify and treat cardiovascular diseases in the elderly.

Oral anticoagulants for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in frail elderly patients: insights from the ARISTOPHANES study

BACKGROUND

Patient frailty amongst patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is associated with adverse health outcomes and increased risk of mortality. Additional evidence is needed to evaluate effective and safe NVAF treatment in this patient population.

OBJECTIVES

This subgroup analysis of the ARISTOPHANES study compared the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (S/SE) and major bleeding (MB) amongst frail NVAF patients prescribed nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or warfarin.

METHODS

This comparative retrospective observational study of frail, older NVAF patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban or warfarin from 01JAN2013-30SEP2015 was conducted using Medicare and 3 US commercial claims databases. To compare each drug, 6 propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts were created. Patient cohorts were pooled from 4 databases after PSM. Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) of S/SE and MB.

RESULTS

Amongst NVAF patients, 34% (N = 150 487) met frailty criteria. Apixaban and rivaroxaban were associated with a lower risk of S/SE vs warfarin (apixaban: HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.55-0.69; rivaroxaban: HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.72-0.87). For MB, apixaban (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.57-0.66) and dabigatran (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.70-0.89) were associated with a lower risk and rivaroxaban (HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08-1.21) was associated with a higher risk vs warfarin.

CONCLUSION

Amongst this cohort of frail NVAF patients, NOACs were associated with varying rates of stroke/SE and MB compared with warfarin. Due to the lack of real-world data regarding OAC treatment in frail patients, these results may inform clinical practice in the treatment of this patient population.

Association Between Frailty and Atrial Fibrillation in Older Adults: The Framingham Heart Study Offspring Cohort

Background Frailty is associated bidirectionally with cardiovascular disease. However, the relations between frailty and atrial fibrillation (AF) have not been fully elucidated. Methods and Results Using the FHS (Framingham Heart Study) Offspring cohort, we sought to examine both the association between frailty (2005-2008) and incident AF through 2016 and the association between prevalent AF and frailty status (2011-2014). Frailty was defined using the Fried phenotype. Models adjusted for age, sex, and smoking. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for competing risk of death, assessed the association between prevalent frailty and incident AF. Logistic regression models assessed the association between prevalent AF and new-onset frailty. For the incident AF analysis, we included 2053 participants (56% women; mean age, 69.7±6.9 years). By Fried criteria, 1018 (50%) were robust, 903 (44%) were prefrail, and 132 (6%) were frail. In total, 306 incident cases of AF occurred during an average 9.2 (SD, 3.1) follow-up years. After adjustment, there was no statistically significant association between prevalent frailty status and incident AF (prefrail versus robust: hazard ratio [HR], 1.22 [95% CI, 0.95-1.55]; frail versus robust: HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.57-1.47]). At follow-up, there were 111 new cases of frailty. After adjustment, there was no statistically significant association between prevalent AF and new-onset frailty (odds ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.17-1.36]). Conclusions Although a bidirectional association between frailty and cardiovascular disease has been suggested, we did not find evidence of an association between frailty and AF. Our findings may be limited by sample size and should be further explored in other populations.

Frailty, Cognitive Impairment, and Anticoagulation Among Older Adults with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is challenging in older patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who are often frail and have cognitive impairment. We examined the characteristics of older NVAF patients associated with higher odds of physical and cognitive impairments. We also examined if these high-risk patients have different OAC prescribing patterns and their satisfaction with treatment because it may impact optimal management of their NVAF.

METHODS

The patients in the Systematic Assessment of Geriatric Elements in Atrial Fibrillation (SAGE-AF study cohort 2016-2018) had NVAF, were aged 65 and older, and eligible for the receipt of OAC. Measures included frailty (Fried Frailty scale), cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment Battery), OAC prescribing and type (direct oral anticoagulant [DOAC] or vitamin K antagonist [VKA]), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), bleeding, stroke risk, and treatment benefit (Anti-Clot Treatment Scale).

RESULTS

Patients (n = 1,244) were 49% female, aged 76 (standard deviation = 7) years. A total of 14% were frail, and 42% had cognitive impairment. Frailty and cognitive impairment co-occurred in 9%. Odds of having both impairments versus none were higher with depression (odds ratio [OR] = 4.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.59-8.26), older age (OR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.29-1.88), lower education (OR = 3.81; 95%CI = 2.13-6.81), race/ethnicity other than non-Hispanic White (OR = 7.94; 95% CI = 4.34-14.55), bleeding risk (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.12-1.81), and stroke risk (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.13-1.62). OAC prescribing was not associated with CI and frailty status. Among patients taking OACs (85%), those with both impairments were more likely to take DOAC than VKA (OR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.01-2.80). Having both impairments (OR = 1.87; 95% CI = 1.08-3.27) or cognitive impairment (OR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.09-2.24) was associated with higher odds of reporting lower treatment benefit.

CONCLUSION

In a large cohort of older NVAF patients, half were frail or cognitively impaired, and 9% had both impairments. We highlight the characteristics of patients who may benefit from cognitive and physical function screenings to maximize treatment and enhance prognosis. Finally, the co-occurrence of impairment was associated with low perceived benefit of treatment that may impede optimal management.

Incident frailty and cognitive impairment by heart failure status in older patients with atrial fibrillation: the SAGE-AF study

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) frequently co-occur in older individuals. Among patients with AF, HF increases risks for stroke and death, but the associations between HF and incident cognition and physical impairment remain unknown. We aimed to examine the cross-sectional and prospective associations between HF, cognition, and frailty among older patients with AF.

Methods

The SAGE-AF (Systematic Assessment of Geriatric Elements in AF) study enrolled 1244 patients with AF (mean age 76 years, 48% women) from five practices in Massachusetts and Georgia. HF at baseline was identified from electronic health records using ICD-9/10 codes. At baseline and 1-year, frailty was assessed by Cardiovascular Health Survey score and cognition was assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.

Results

Patients with prevalent HF (n = 463, 37.2%) were older, less likely to be non-Hispanic white, had less education, and had greater cardiovascular comorbidity burden and higher CHA₂DS₂VASC and HAS-BLED scores than patients without HF (all P's < 0.01). In multivariable adjusted regression models, HF (present vs. absent) was associated with both prevalent frailty (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.64-3.46) and incident frailty at 1 year (aOR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.37-4.51). HF was also independently associated with baseline cognitive impairment (aOR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.22-2.11), but not with developing cognitive impairment at 1 year (aOR 1.04, 95%CI: 0.64-1.70).

Conclusions

Among ambulatory older patients with AF, the co-existence of HF identifies individuals with physical and cognitive impairments who are at higher short-term risk for becoming frail. Preventive strategies to this vulnerable subgroup merit consideration.

The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines program was developed to aid clinicians in the management of these complex patients, as well as to provide direction to policy makers and health care systems regarding related issues. The most recent comprehensive CCS AF guidelines update was published in 2010. Since then, periodic updates were published dealing with rapidly changing areas. However, since 2010 a large number of developments had accumulated in a wide range of areas, motivating the committee to complete a thorough guideline review. The 2020 iteration of the CCS AF guidelines represents a comprehensive renewal that integrates, updates, and replaces the past decade of guidelines, recommendations, and practical tips. It is intended to be used by practicing clinicians across all disciplines who care for patients with AF. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to evaluate recommendation strength and the quality of evidence. Areas of focus include: AF classification and definitions, epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, screening and opportunistic AF detection, detection and management of modifiable risk factors, integrated approach to AF management, stroke prevention, arrhythmia management, sex differences, and AF in special populations. Extensive use is made of tables and figures to synthesize important material and present key concepts. This document should be an important aid for knowledge translation and a tool to help improve clinical management of this important and challenging arrhythmia.

Current Understanding of the Role of Frailty in Cardiovascular Disease

The elderly population is increasing because of increasing life expectancy, and the prevalence of frailty increases with age. Frailty commonly coexists with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), such as coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure (HF), aortic stenosis (AS), and atrial fibrillation (AF). Frail patients who undergo revascularization for CAD have higher complication rates; those with HF have a high prevalence of poor outcomes, and those with AF are vulnerable to increased stroke incidence. Moreover, frailty and asymptomatic severe AS were independent factors for mortality. The presence of frailty can lead to poor clinical outcomes, and frailty has been identified as a risk factor for mortality. Thus, the identification of frail patients who are at higher risks of disability and adverse clinical outcomes is important. In this review, the relationship between frailty and CVD is appraised and optimal treatments for frail patients are discussed.

Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants in Older Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Objective

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia, typically increases with age. Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are the cornerstone of treatment to reduce the associated risk for systemic thromboembolism. Four large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in preventing stroke and systemic embolism, as well as regarding their risk for major bleeding. However, as vulnerable geriatric patients with AF were largely underrepresented in these trials, physicians are faced with the challenge of choosing the right anticoagulant for geriatric patients in real-life clinical practice. In this vulnerable patient group, NOACs tend to be underused or underdosed due to concerns of excessive fall-related intracranial bleeding, cognitive impairment, multiple drug-drug interactions, low body weight or impaired renal function. As life expectancy continues to rise worldwide, the number of geriatric patients substantially increases. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a critical appraisal of the added value of NOACs in geriatric patients with AF at high thromboembolic and bleeding risk.

Methods and Results

This systematic review provides an overview of the literature on the impact of increased age (≥75 years), multimorbidity, polypharmacy, increased falling risk, frailty and dementia on the effectiveness and safety of NOACs as compared to VKAs, after searching the Medline database. Moreover, a meta-analysis on the impact of increased age ≥75 years old was performed after pooling results from 6 post hoc analyses of RCTs and 6 longitudinal observational cohort studies, highlighting the superior effectiveness (hazard ratio (HR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.74–0.94] for stroke/SE; HR 0.77, 95%CI [0.65–0.92] for mortality) and non-inferior safety (HR 0.93, 95%CI [0.86–1.01] for major bleeding; HR 0.58, 95%CI [0.50–0.67] for intracranial bleeding; HR 1.17, 95%CI [0.99–1.38] for gastrointestinal bleeding) of NOACs versus VKAs in older AF patients.

Conclusion

Across geriatric subgroups, apixaban was consistently associated with the most favourable benefit-risk profile and should therefore be preferred in geriatric patients with AF. However, research gaps on the impact of increased falling risk, frailty and baseline dementia were identified, requiring careful consideration while awaiting more results.

Cause of Death and Associated Factors in Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation - Long-Term Retrospective Study

Background: Oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy reduces the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study elucidated the causes of death and related factors in elderly Japanese AF patients.

Methods and Results: Over a median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up period of 46 (20–76) months, there were 171 all-cause deaths (28% cardiovascular, 46% non-cardiovascular, and 26% unknown causes) among 389 AF patients (median [IQR] age 80 [74–85] years; CHAD₂DS₂-VASc score 5 [4–6]). Cox regression analysis indicated that diabetes was associated with an increase in all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–2.13), whereas hypercholesterolemia (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.35–0.79), pre-existing heart failure (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.48–0.95), and OAC use (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.44–0.88) were associated with reductions in all-cause death. Pre-existing heart failure was associated with both cardiovascular (HR 3.03; 95% CI 1.33–8.20) and non-cardiovascular (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.30–0.65) deaths, in opposite directions. OAC use was associated with a reduction in cardiovascular death (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17–0.69). The predominance of non-cardiovascular death and death-related factors were equivalent regardless of when observations started (before 2009 or in 2009 and later).

Conclusions: The predominant cause of death in elderly Japanese AF patients was non-cardiovascular. Distinct clinical factors were associated with cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular death.

Quality of Life and Frailty Syndrome in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and frailty syndrome (FS) are a part of the aging process. Both are still of great importance in the assessment of quality of life (QoL). There is definitely a lack of research clarifying the association between FS and QoL in AF patients.

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of FS on QoL in AF patients.

Materials and Methods

The retrospective and observational study included 158 inpatients with mean age 69.8±7.1 years, treated for AF in the cardiac department from 1 April 2019 to 31 June 2019. The following instruments were used: the Arrhythmia-Specific Questionnaire in Tachycardia and Arrhythmia (ASTA) and the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS).

Results

The mean level of frailty in the study group was 8.5±5.0. In 25.9% of patients, the level of frailty was mild, in 10.1% moderate, and in 17.1% severe. Patients were divided into two groups based on their frailty status. In comparative analysis of the QoL, there were significant differences between the groups: the frail group had more intense symptoms of arrhythmia than the non-frail group (14.9±4.1 vs 11.9±4.9; p<0.001). In the analysis of the total score impact of arrhythmia on QoL, the frail group had a significantly higher score than the non-frail group (23.5±5.2 vs 14.5±5.5), which confirmed the stronger negative impact of arrhythmia on QoL. In the regression coefficient analysis, the independent predictor of symptom severity and QoL was FS. However, we observed a negative impact of diabetes, which increased the impact of arrhythmia on QoL, and physical activity, which improved QoL and decreased the impact of symptoms on everyday life.

Conclusion

Patients in the frail group have worse QoL and higher impact of arrhythmia on QoL in comparison to patients in the non-frail group. Frailty is an independent predictor of higher intensity of symptoms of arrhythmia and worse QoL. Diabetes and physical activity are predictors of QoL for patients with AF.

Rates of Potentially Inappropriate Dosing of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants and Associations With Geriatric Conditions Among Older Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The SAGE-AF Study

Background

Direct‐acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dosing guidelines for atrial fibrillation recommend dose alteration based on age, renal function, body weight, and drug‐drug interactions. There is paucity of data describing the frequency and factors associated with prescription of potentially inappropriate doses.

Methods and Results

In the ongoing SAGE‐AF (Systematic Assessment of Geriatric Elements in Atrial Fibrillation) study, we performed geriatric assessments (frailty, cognitive impairment, sensory impairments, social isolation, and depression) for participants with atrial fibrillation (age ≥65 years, CHA₂DS₂VASc ≥2, no anticoagulant contraindications). We developed an algorithm to analyze DOAC dose appropriateness accounting for drug‐drug interactions, age, renal function, and body weight. We also examined whether geriatric impairments were related to inappropriate dosing. Of 1064 patients prescribed anticoagulants, 460 received a DOAC. Participants were aged 74±7 years, 49% were women, and 82% were white. A quarter (23%; n=105) of participants received inappropriate DOAC dose, of whom 82 (78%) were underdosed and 23 (22%) were overdosed. Among participants receiving an inappropriate dose, 12 (11%) were identified using the drug‐drug interactions criteria and would have otherwise been misclassified. In multivariable regression analyses, older age, higher CHA₂DS₂VASc score, and history of renal failure were associated with inappropriate DOAC dosing (P<0.05). Geriatric conditions were not associated with inappropriate dosing.

Conclusions

In this cohort, over 20% of older patients with atrial fibrillation treated with DOACs were prescribed an inappropriate dose, with most being underdosed. Drug‐drug interactions were common. Factors that influence prescription of guideline‐nonadherent doses may be perception of higher bleeding risk or presence of renal failure in addition to lack of familiarity with dosing guidelines.

Opportunistic screening for atrial fibrillation with a single lead device in geriatric patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic yield of repeated screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) among geriatric patients.

METHODS

A pragmatic prospective cohort study into applying opportunistic screening for AF with a handheld single lead ECG device (SLD) in a geriatric cohort. Consecutive patients of 65 years old and older visiting the geriatric outpatient clinic were eligible for inclusion. A 12 lead ECG was performed, followed by measurements with the SLD during every visit to the geriatric outpatient clinic. A frailty index was based on the accumulation of deficits model.

RESULTS

478 patients were eligible. Patients were excluded if they did not give informed consent (17 patients), had a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (20 patients), or had incomplete medical files (two patients). After exclusion, 439 patients participated in this study. The mean age was 78 years (range 65 to 100 years), 54% were female. AF was known in 89 patients (20%), first detected on the baseline ECG in four patients (1%) and first detected with the SLD in 20 patients (5%) during follow up visits. Sensitivity of the SLD was 90.0%, specificity 99.0%, negative predictive value 99.7%, and positive predictive value 73.5%. Most patients (82%) with AF were frail and 53% were severely frail.

CONCLUSION

Repeated screening in geriatric patients has a five times higher diagnostic yield than usual care. It was easily combined with usual care. Because of the positive predictive value of 73.5%, it remains necessary to confirm AF with a 12 lead ECG or 24-h Holter monitoring.

Frailty and Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients Aged 65 Years or Older with Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Elderly adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased risk of frailty and thromboembolic complications. However, studies on the prevalence of frailty in AF patients and data on the relationship between frailty and the use of anticoagulants are limited.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 500 participants. Patients aged 65 years or older were consecutively selected from the Chinese Atrial Fibrillation Registry study. The patient’s frailty status was assessed with use of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale. We assessed the prevalence of and factors associated with frailty, and how frailty affects anticoagulant therapy.Results: In 500 elderly adults with AF (age 75.2±6.7 years; 51.6% female), 201 patients (40.2%) were frail. The prevalence of frailty was higher in females (P=0.002) and increased with age and CHA2DS2-VASc score (P for trend less than 0.001 for both). The factors associated with frailty were a history of heart failure (odds ratio [OR] 2.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39‐4.14), female sex (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.27‐3.43), and advanced age (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.09‐1.17). Frail patients were significantly less likely to have ever been prescribed anticoagulants compared with nonfrail patients (81.7 vs. 54.9%, P<0.001).Conclusions: Frailty is prevalent in elderly adults with AF, especially in females, those of advanced age, and those with heart failure. Frailty status has a significant impact on prescription of anticoagulants for high-risk AF patients.