Nanostructured Hydroxyapatite-Chitosan Composite Biomaterial for Bone Tissue Engineering

Fish scale-derived hydroxyapatite for alveolar ridge preservation

Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction poses significant challenges for future dental restorations. This study investigated the efficacy of fish scale-derived hydroxyapatite (FSHA) as a socket preservation graft material to maintain alveolar bone volume and architecture. FSHA was extracted from *Labeo rohita* fish scales and characterized using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis. In vitro, biocompatibility and osteogenic potential were assessed using Saos-2 human osteosarcoma cells. Cell viability, migration, and proliferation were evaluated using MTT and scratch assays. In vivo performance was assessed in a rat model, and FSHA was compared to a commercial xenograft (Osseograft) and ungrafted controls. Histological analysis was performed at 8-week post-implantation to quantify new bone formation. FTIR confirmed the purity and homogeneity of FSHA. In vitro, FSHA enhanced Saos-2 viability, migration, and proliferation compared to controls. In vivo, FSHA demonstrated superior bone regeneration compared to Osseograft and ungrafted sites, with balanced graft resorption and new bone formation. Histological analysis revealed an active incorporation of FSHA into new bone, with minimal gaps and ongoing remodeling. Approximately 50%-60% of FSHA was resorbed by 8 weeks, closely matching the rate of new bone deposition. FSHA stimulated more bone formation in the apical socket region than in coronal areas. In conclusion, FSHA is a promising biomaterial for alveolar ridge preservation, exhibiting excellent biocompatibility, osteogenic potential, and balanced resorption. Its ability to promote robust bone regeneration highlights its potential as an effective alternative to currently used graft materials in socket preservation procedures.

In vivo study of chitosan-natural nano hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration

Significant development has been achieved with bioceramics and biopolymer scaffolds in the construction of artificial bone. In the present study, we have developed and compared chitosan-micro hydroxyapatite (chitosan-mHA) and chitosan-nano hydroxyapatite (chitosan-nHA) scaffolds as bone graft substitutes. The biocompatibility and cell proliferation of the prepared scaffolds were checked with preosteoblast (MC3T3-E1) cells. Total Volume (TV), bone volume (BV), bone surface (BS), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular number (Tb.N) and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) were found to be higher in chitosan-nHA than chitosan-mHA scaffold. Hence, we suggest that chitosan-nHA scaffold could be a promising biomaterial for bone tissue engineering.

Chitin and chitosan composites for bone tissue regeneration

In the present world, where there is increased obesity and poor physical activity, the occurrence of bone disorders has also been increased steeply. Therefore, a significant progress has been made in organ transplantation, surgical reconstruction, and the use of artificial prostheses to treat the loss or failure of an organ or bone tissue in the recent years. Bone contains considerable amounts of minerals and proteins. The major component of bone is hydroxyapatite [Ca(10)(PO(4))(6)(OH)(2)] (60-65%) and is one of the most stable forms of calcium phosphate and it occurs along with other materials including collagen, chondroitin sulfate, keratin sulfate, and lipids. To remedy bone defects, new natural and synthetic materials are needed, which will have very similar properties as that of natural bone. Bone tissue engineering is a relatively new and emerging field, which paves the way for bone repair or regeneration. Polymers can serve as a matrix to support cell growth by having various properties such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, porosity, charge, mechanical strength, and hydrophobicity. Considerable attention has been given to chitin and chitosan composite materials and their applications in the field of bone tissue engineering in the recent years, which are natural biopolymers. This chapter reviews the various composites of chitin and chitosan, which are proved to be potential materials for bone tissue regeneration.