A survey of pediatric critical care nurses' knowledge of pain management

Nurses' Beliefs Regarding Pain in Critically Ill Children: A Mixed-Methods Study

The purpose of this study was to provide a current and comprehensive evaluation of nurses' beliefs regarding pain in critically ill children.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used. Nurse beliefs were captured via questionnaire and interview and then compared.

RESULTS

Forty nurses participated. Most beliefs reported via questionnaire were consistent with effective pain management practices. Common inaccurate beliefs included the need to verify pain reports with physical indicators and the pharmacokinetics of intravenous opioids. Beliefs commonly shared during interviews concerned the need to verify pain reports with observed behavior, the accuracy of pain reports, the need to respond to pain, concerns regarding opioid analgesics, and the need to "start low" with interventions. Convergent beliefs between the questionnaire and interview included the use of physical indicators to verify pain, the need to take the child's word when pain is described, and concerns regarding negative effects of analgesics. Divergent and conflicting findings were most often regarding the legitimacy of a child's pain report.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study regarding the accuracy of nurses' pain beliefs for critically ill children are consistent with past research. The presence of divergent and conflicting responses suggests that nurses' pain beliefs are not static and may vary with patient characteristics.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

While most nurses appreciate the risks of unrelieved pain in children, many are concerned about the potential adverse effects of opioid administration. Interventions are needed to guide nurses in minimizing both of these risks.

PICU Nurses' Pain Assessments and Intervention Choices for Virtual Human and Written Vignettes

The purpose of this concurrent mixed-methods study was to 1) examine the factors pediatric intensive care unit nurses consider when assessing and intervening for children who report severe pain and to 2) determine the effect of child behavior and diagnosis on the nurses' pain ratings and intervention choices for written and virtual human vignettes. Quantitative and qualitative results substantiated that despite recommendations to use self-report, many PICU nurses use behavior as the primary indicator to assess and treat pain, even when a child is old enough to articulate pain intensity and there is sufficient cause for pain to be present.

Student nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy of children's pain management: evaluation of an education program in Taiwan

The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a pediatric pain education program (PPEP) for student nurses. The sample consisted of 181 licensed student nurses who were enrolled in a nursing school in Taiwan. Student nurses attended a 4-hour PPEP that involved case scenario discussion, video, and lecture. Data were collected by an extensive questionnaire that assessed student nurses' knowledge of, attitudes toward, and self-efficacy in pediatric pain assessment and pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain management. The results demonstrated that student nurses gained significant knowledge of pediatric pain, expressed more appropriate attitudes, and reported greater self-efficacy in children's pain management after attending PPEP. Their knowledge of analgesic pharmacotherapy did not significantly improve. These results suggest that PPEP should be integrated into pediatric nursing curricula to enhance knowledge and skills regarding children's pain management during the early stage of a nursing career.

Teaching Behavioral Pain Management to Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review of Research in Training Programs

Pain is a common and potentially debilitating condition. Whereas there is vast literature on developmentally appropriate behavioral techniques for pain management, results of curriculum evaluations and knowledge surveys reveal a dearth of awareness of these strategies in healthcare professionals. As a result, the development and evaluation of pain management training programs are important endeavors. Results of studies evaluating such programs are promising and suggest that training might be an effective means of impacting healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and even patient care. These results must be interpreted with caution, however, because the literature contains several conceptual and methodologic limitations. These limitations, in combination with the wide diversity in program components, format of delivery, and research methods, preclude definitive conclusions on the most practical and effective means to provide training. To address this question, further systematic work on the development and evaluation of pain management training programs is warranted.

PERSPECTIVE

To address the problems of dissemination of behavioral pain management techniques, the development and evaluation of pain management training programs are important endeavors. The current article presents a systematic review of studies evaluating such programs and provides recommendations for future systematic work in this area.

Pain evaluation and management: a survey of Italian radiotherapists

GOALS

The objective of this study was to assess the knowledge possessed and the attitudes held by Italian radiotherapists regarding evaluation and treatment of pain.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-six radiotherapists completed a 16-item questionnaire that was specifically designed to investigate three main topics: the attention paid to pain, the use of analgesics, and pain in children. Chi-square or Fisher's exact text was employed to evaluate differences based on position (staff/resident), age (<35 or >35 years old), availability of consultants in pain therapy and/or palliative care, colleagues with main interest in palliative care among their own staff, and region of residence (north/center/south of Italy).

RESULTS

Overall percentage of correct answers was 76.6% (range 34.9-94.4%). Correct answers by groups of items were: attention paid to pain 77.3%, use of analgesics 81.5%, and pain in children 63.7%.

CONCLUSION

Results of the survey demonstrate that knowledge and attitudes of Italian radiotherapists towards the approach to and treatment of pain can be considered satisfactory.

A survey of current perianesthesia nursing practice for pain and comfort management

Widespread dissemination of information and high-profile press coverage about pain and comfort management has resulted in heightened awareness among health care professionals and the public of the need for improvements in the way pain and comfort are managed. Despite significant advances in treatment options for pain relief and comfort, studies show that both phenomena continue to be poorly managed and undertreated. Providing pain relief and comfort to patients are important fundamental components of good nursing care; however, no studies have been performed to evaluate these responsibilities in perianesthesia nursing practice. Therefore, a descriptive survey was undertaken to assess the current practices for pain and comfort management among perianesthesia nurses. A convenience sample of 220 perianesthesia nurses working in preoperative and postoperative settings in rural and urban hospitals, outpatient centers, and freestanding facilities completed a questionnaire survey. The survey asked 10 questions that addressed various aspects of pain and comfort care, including assessment in different settings, discharge criteria, and obstacles in the management of pain and comfort. Findings showed that perianesthesia nurses assessed pain at a frequency of 58% and comfort at a frequency of 56% on admission. Preoperative assessment of patients' desired level of pain relief and comfort occurred at frequencies of 21% and 20%, respectively. Pain was assessed most often with self-report pain ratings and ordinal descriptions such as "no pain" to "severe pain." A moderate pain level was used most often as a discharge criterion. Inappropriate and inadequate physicians' orders were cited as two of the most common obstacles to managing pain and comfort. Findings of this study can be used to increase awareness of the need to evaluate and improve pain and comfort management education and practices in the perianesthesia settings. ASPAN will also use the results as baseline data as it establishes a strategic plan to address the educational needs of its members.

Management of sedation in mechanically ventilated patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There are many new and exciting studies in the sedation literature. Recent studies of new scoring systems to monitor sedation, new medications, and new insights into post-intensive care unit (ICU) sequelae have brought about interesting ideas for achieving an adequate level of sedation of our patients while minimizing complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recent literature focuses on monitoring the level of a patient's sedation with new bedside clinical scoring systems and new technology. Outcomes studies have highlighted problems with both inadequate sedation and excessive sedation in regard to patients' post-ICU psychological health. More insight into drug withdrawal and addiction as complications of ICU care were examined. A new medication for sedation in the ICU has been approved for use, but its role is not yet defined.

SUMMARY

Many patients in the ICU receive mechanical ventilation and will require sedative medications. A frequently overlooked cause of agitation in the ventilated patient is pain, and assessing the adequacy of analgesia is an important part of the continuous assessment of a patient. The goal of sedation is to provide relief while minimizing the development of drug dependency and oversedation. Careful monitoring with bedside scoring systems, the appropriate use of medications, and a strategy of daily interruption can lead to diminished time on the ventilator and in the ICU.

Pain assessment in critical care: what have we learnt from research

Despite an ongoing acknowledgement in the literature that pain is a significant problem within the critical care environment, this issue has not been adequately addressed by critical care nurses. This paper examines strategies for changing pain management practices in critical care, including reviewing documentation practices, the utilisation of guidelines and algorithms to augment clinical decision making, and increasing educational opportunities available to critical care nurses. It is recommended that pain assessment be given a higher priority within the clinical context, particularly as inadequate pain assessment and management has been linked to increased morbidity and mortality within critical care. Importantly, critical care nurses need to not only be aware of research-based pain management practices, but also lead the way in implementation and continuous evaluation as a measure of decreasing patient pain in the future.

How do intensive care nurses assess patients' pain?

Identification and evaluation of pain in critical care patients may be difficult because of communication problems. Moreover, at present there are very few nursing studies that examine the attitudes of critical care nurses towards the assessment of patients' pain. This study was designed to determine the approach of critical care nurses towards assessing patients' pain levels, and to evaluate the problems in nursing diagnosis of those having difficulty in articulating their pain symptoms. We used a questionnaire to assess nurses attitudes to patients' pain. The study sample consisted of 91 critical care nurses who were recruited between January and February 2002. The results suggest that patient pain was considered undesirable by 44% of nurses. About 70-3% of the nurses reported resorting to administering analgesics to relieve their patients' pain. Some 57.1 % of nurses stated that they would have investigated whether the patients had really been experiencing pain, prior to administering the prescribed analgesics to patients. Some 85.7% of the sample indicated that the patients themselves would make the most accurate evaluation of their pain. The data suggested that 39.6% of nurses did not know how to evaluate pain symptoms in critical care patients suffering from complicated problems, and that 37.4% evaluated pain by monitoring the patients' behaviours. The study demonstrated that most of the critical care nurses did not know how to evaluate pain in patients having communication problems. The paper concludes by suggesting that there is a clear need to address nursing education and training with regard to evaluation and management of patients' pain whilst in critical care environment.

Poor communication and knowledge deficits: obstacles to effective management of children's postoperative pain

AIM OF THE STUDY

To explore the perceptions of nurses and parents of the management of postoperative pain in children. This paper focuses on issues of knowledge and communication.

BACKGROUND

Nurses are the key health care professionals with responsibility for managing children's pain, however, nurses are not well supported educationally to manage the level of responsibility.

RESULTS

Using matched interviews between 20 parents and 20 nurses many issues arose relating to the nurse/parent communication process. It was also clear that despite nurses' knowledge of pain management being deficient, they had expectations that required parents to have a level of knowledge they did not possess.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that nurses' poor communication with parents and nurses' knowledge deficits in relation to children's pain management create obstacles to effective pain management. These obstacles need to be addressed in order to improve the management of children's pain through better education of nurses and two way communication with parents.

An action research study exploring how education may enhance pain management in children

The aim of this study was to explore and address the views of children's nurses in relation to their educational needs on pain management. Action research was the methodology used: focus groups were run to identify the problem of nurses' educational needs; action planning was used to develop a short programme of study for nurses to address identified needs. Evaluation was by questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Ten children's nurses attended the study day. All the nurses said they gained knowledge on the day--in particular assessment of pain and the individuality of the pain experience. The nurses felt that their new knowledge increased their confidence and contributed to them feeling assertive when managing children's pain. The study findings suggest that the current provision in relation to education programmes for children's nurses needs to be improved, in order to provide them with the knowledge and confidence to manage children's pain more effectively.

Knowledge and attitudes of Italian medical staff towards the approach and treatment of patients in pain

This study is part of the project, "Towards a Pain-Free Hospital," which aims at improving the approach and treatment of the patient in pain. The objective of the study was to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of doctors and nurses on the wards of a 1000-bed general hospital located in a rather densely-populated, industrialized area of Italy regarding the following topics: attention paid to pain, the use of analgesic drugs, and pain in children. In total, 669 nurses and 225 doctors completed a 16-item questionnaire evaluating knowledge and beliefs about pain. The overall percentage of correct answers was 61% (9.7/16). The score varied among the different wards and ranged from 48% (7.8/16) to 76% (12.3/16). Physicians scored 65% and nurses 59% (p < 0.001). The percentage of correct answers varied widely among the different items (from 30% to 96%). From these results, we conclude that there are still significant knowledge deficits and erroneous beliefs that may hamper treatment of the patient in pain. These results will help in conducting educational programs aimed at improving pain treatment in the different departments of the hospital.

Jordanian nurses' roles in the management of postoperative pain in the postanesthesia care unit

One of the most important patient care issues for nurses is pain because of its significant impact on patients' well-being. Therefore, the main purpose of this exploratory study was to describe the role of Jordanian nurses in the management of postoperative pain in the PACU. A convenience sample of 42 postoperative patients was included in this study. Forty-two nurse-patient encounters involving 20 different nurses were observed during data collection. Findings from this study indicated that nurses in Jordan pay little attention to the area of assessment and management of postoperative pain. Cultural issues were discussed in light of the perception of pain and management of postoperative pain among Jordanian patients. Recommendations related to nursing practice, education, and research were developed to improve the quality of nursing care provided to postoperative patients in Jordan.

Pain in hospitalized children: pediatric nurses' beliefs and practices

A descriptive design was used to gather information regarding nurses' beliefs and documentation practices related to pain assessment and management in children. Pediatric nurses (n = 260) from eight hospital units completed a child and pain survey. Nurses' pain-related documentations on children (n = 153) were also examined. Results showed inconsistency between what nurses believe about pain assessment and management and their documentation of practice. Nurses believed that assessment is the first step toward alleviating pain in children. However, it was not evident in their documentations that nurses used developmentally appropriate tools for assessment or for evaluation of children's responses to pain management strategies.

Nurses' knowledge about pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain management in children

The purpose of this study was to investigate the knowledge base and practices of Finnish nurses in the area of children in pain. The convenience sample consisted of 265 nurses working on children's wards in university hospitals. Data were collected using an instrument designed for the study. The results showed that there remain gaps in the knowledge base of nurses with regard to both pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain management in children. The education and the area of expertise were significant influences on knowledge scores. Nurses used a fairly wide range of nonpharmacological pain alleviation methods but most of these were such that the nurse was in an active role and the child was passive. There is a clear need for further education. Nurses should take a more active role in seeking new information and also should be encouraged to use nonpharmacological methods that let the children be active participants in their own care.

Nurses' assessments and management of pain in children having orthopedic surgery

The specific aims of this research project were to (a) describe selected verbal, nonverbal, and physiological arousal indicators of the child's pain; (b) describe which pain indicators were most influential to nurses in decision-making about interventions for managing the child's pain; (c) describe pain interventions used by nurses; (d) compare postoperative analgesic orders to recommended dosages for the children; and (e) explore relationships between the child's self-report of pain and medication dosages administered. Subjects included 19 children aged 5-17 years who experienced 20 orthopedic surgical procedures (one child had two surgeries one week apart). Data were collected by staff nurses for the first five days after surgery. Pain levels were reported using the Oucher Scale. Postoperative pain was reported at moderate levels and showed only a gradual decrease throughout the hospital stay. Nonverbal pain indicators included crying and tense face. The child's complaint of pain and reported Oucher scores were most influential in influencing nurses to intervene in the child's pain. Nonpharmacological comfort measures included positioning and reassurance. All children received medications for pain; 49% of the orders were within the recommended therapeutic dosage range. A small but significant correlation was found between the child's reported pain level and the morphine equivalents of pain medication received. Recommendations included development of nursing flow charts that provide space to record pain levels and nursing interventions, in-service education for nurses on nonpharmacological interventions, and further research with a larger sample and a single pain rating scale.