Social participation of individuals with spinal injury using wheelchairs in rural Tanzania after peer training and entrepreneurial skills training

Activity limitations, participation restrictions, and environmental barriers among persons with traumatic spinal cord injury in Kenya

PURPOSE

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a life-changing condition, almost always leading to disability. The aim was to determine the period-prevalence of activity limitations, participation restrictions, and environmental barriers in community-dwelling persons with traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) in Kenya.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of 90 community-dwelling adult persons living with TSCI for more than 1 year, recruited from the database of the only specialised rehabilitation, in-patient, facility in Kenya. Modules of the International Spinal Cord Injury community survey (InSCI) used were demographic and injury characteristics; activity and participation; and environmental factors.

RESULTS

Most prevalent activity limitations and participation restrictions in the total sample were using public transportation (90%), standing unsupported (83%), getting to destination (76%), and toileting (76%). The top environmental barriers were inadequate finances (96%), inaccessibility of public places (92%), and problems with long distance transportation (90%). Participants with tetraplegia were more affected with activity limitations and participation restrictions than those with paraplegia.

CONCLUSION

Functioning problems and environmental barriers are prevalent among adults living with TSCI in Kenya. Although this is the best-case scenario with respect to healthcare services, where individuals received inpatient rehabilitation previously, a need exists to examine the principles and models of rehabilitation and explore the value proposition of primary care/community level rehabilitation to further optimise independence and functioning.

Theories, models and frameworks to understand barriers to the provision of mobility-assistive technologies: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

There is strong evidence that mobility-assistive technologies improve occupational performance, social participation, educational and employment access and overall quality of life in people with disabilities. However, people with disabilities still face barriers in accessing mobility products and related services. This review aims to summarise and synthesise: (1) theories, models and frameworks that have been used to understand mobility-assistive technology access, (2) determinants of access and (3) gaps in knowledge.

DESIGN

A scoping review using the five-step framework by Arksey and O'Malley.

DATA SOURCES

We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and SCOPUS databases for publications published between 2000 and 2024. We searched for articles published up to 20 March 2024.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included English-published literature in peer-reviewed journals that reported (a) barriers to the provision of mobility-assistive technologies, (b) including at least one theory, model or framework and (c) between 2000 and 2024.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

We extracted the study characteristics, theories, models, framework usage, research recommendations, key findings on mobility-assistive technology barriers and theoretical propositions. We conduct a theoretical synthesis guided by Turner's approach.

RESULTS

We included 18 articles that used 8 theories, models and frameworks, synthesised into 9 propositions. The synthesised theory emphasises that mobility is essential for human flourishing, and that certain health conditions may impose restrictions on mobility. This impact can be alleviated by two direct determinants: (1) the provision of suitable services and (2) their comprehensive provision. Policies and costs influence these services indirectly. Environmental and personal factors also affect the use of these services. Ineffectively addressing these determinants can limit access to mobility-assistive technologies and subsequent disabilities.

CONCLUSION

Our synthetic model describes the logic of providing evidence-based mobility-assistive technologies, and we identify the determinants of access that can act as targets for future work to improve the provision of mobility-assistive technologies.

Community mobility and participation assessment of manual wheelchair users: a review of current techniques and challenges

According to the World Health Organization, hundreds of individuals commence wheelchair use daily, often due to an injury such as spinal cord injury or through a condition such as a stroke. However, manual wheelchair users typically experience reductions in individual community mobility and participation. In this review, articles from 2017 to 2023 were reviewed to identify means of measuring community mobility and participation of manual wheelchair users, factors that can impact these aspects, and current rehabilitation techniques for improving them. The selected articles document current best practices utilizing self-surveys, in-clinic assessments, and remote tracking through GPS and accelerometer data, which rehabilitation specialists can apply to track their patients' community mobility and participation accurately. Furthermore, rehabilitation methods such as wheelchair training programs, brain-computer interface triggered functional electric stimulation therapy, and community-based rehabilitation programs show potential to improve the community mobility and participation of manual wheelchair users. Recommendations were made to highlight potential avenues for future research.