Efficacy of liquid-based cytology versus conventional smears in FNA samples

Utility of Liquid-Based Cytology and Conventional Smears in Fine Needle Aspirates of Thyroid Lesions: A Comparative Study

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is an established technique in evaluation of thyroid nodules. Traditionally, conventional smears (CS) are prepared as an accepted method for cytologic interpretation. However, with the advent and success of liquid-based cytology (LBC) in gynecological and non-gynecological specimens, there has been an increased interest in its application in thyroid FNA as well. Studies evaluating LBC in thyroid aspirates have emerged in recent years and have shown variable results. Patients presenting with complaints of a palpable swelling in the thyroid/midline neck area or with a detectable lesion on ultrasound were subjected to FNA. A split sample technique was used to prepare CS and LBC smears. The cytological diagnosis of CS and LBC was compared with each other and with follow up. The performance of both methods was estimated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy. The specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy of LBC were comparable to CS. The sensitivity of LBC was slightly lower than CS. The diagnostic accuracy of LBC was comparable to CS demonstrating its utility in thyroid FNAs. LBC offers the advantages of lesser screening time, decreased obscuration by blood, decreased artefactual changes, and potential for adjunctive immunocytochemistry/molecular testing. However, due to a higher unsatisfactory rate in benign lesions, LBC may be used as a supplement to CS in thyroid FNAs.

Comparison of Liquid-Based Preparations with Conventional Smears in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspirates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

To compare conventional smears (CSs) and liquid-based preparations (LBPs) for diagnosing thyroid malignant or suspicious lesions.

METHODS

Studies in the PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane database published up to December 2023. We reviewed 17 studies, including 15,861 samples.

RESULTS

The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for CS was 23.6674. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.879, with sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of 0.8266, 0.8668, 0.8969, and 0.7841, respectively. The rate of inadequate specimens was 0.1280. For LBP, the DOR was 25.3587, with an AUC of 0.865. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were 0.8190, 0.8833, 0.8515, and 0.8562. The rate of inadequate specimens was 0.1729. For CS plus LBP, the AUC was 0.813, with a lower DOR of 9.4557 compared to individual methods. Diagnostic accuracy did not significantly differ among CS, LBP, and CS plus LBP. Subgroup analysis was used to compare ThinPrep and SurePath. The DORs were 29.1494 and 19.7734. SurePath had a significantly higher AUC.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy or proportion of inadequate smears between CS and LBP. SurePath demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy than ThinPrep. Recommendations for fine-needle aspiration cytology should consider cost, feasibility, and accuracy.

Comparison of liquid based cytology and conventional smears on lymph node aspirates: A cytomorphological study

Objective

In an era of minimally invasive and rapid diagnostic technologies, fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is most useful when it comes to patients with lymphadenopathies especially of the cervical region. Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is an alternative processing method which is used for both gynecological and non-gynecological samples. Because of the remarkable advantages of LBC smears in gynecological samples, nowadays, many studies have been done to assess its utility in various other lesions. Hereby, with the help of this study, we would like to evaluate the efficiency of LBC smears in comparison to conventional FNAC smears conventional smears (CS) on lymph node aspirates.

Material and Methods

A retrospective study was done over a 1-year period in which 253 cases of lymph node aspirates were included in the study. The slides were prepared using standard conventional and LBC techniques and compared for adequacy, cellularity, cell architecture, necrosis, background debris, presence of cells in monolayer sheets, and nuclear/cytoplasmic details.

Results

Of the total 253 cases, 171 (67.6%) were and 67 (26.5%) were diagnosed as non-neoplastic and malignant, respectively. Although the LBC smears were useful in the diagnosis of malignant cases, they did pose some challenges especially in the non-neoplastic lymph node aspirates due to loss of the background necrosis. In addition, the cellular yield in LBC smears was low in comparison to CS.

Conclusion

LBC smears from lymph node aspirates results in better diagnostic accuracy for malignant cases due to better cellular and nuclear details. However, for non-neoplastic etiology, it should not be considered better than CS as loss of the background necrosis and inflammation may result in an incorrect diagnosis.

A Comparative Analysis of Liquid-Based Cytology and Conventional Smears in Fine-Needle Aspirates of Thyroid Lesions

Background Palpable nodules in the thyroid are present in 4-7% of the general population. Fine-needle aspiration cytology is a safe and cost-effective method of choice for evaluating thyroid nodules. Aspirated samples can be manually spread directly onto the slide and stained in the conventional smear method. The liquid-cased cytology method has been recently introduced, which is an automated machine-based method, yielding a single slide with a clean background and greater preservation of cells and consuming less time for screening. This study aimed to compare the cytomorphological features and diagnostic accuracy of conventional smears and liquid-based cytology smears. Methodology This prospective study comprised 250 cases of thyroid lesions. Fine-needle aspiration cytology using conventional smears and liquid-based cytology smears was reported per the Bethesda system of reporting thyroid cytopathology. Detailed cytomorphological features were evaluated and compared in both techniques. Results The cellularity of conventional smears was significantly higher for scores 2+ and 3+ than paired liquid-based cytology smears (paired t-test, p < 0.001). The overall diagnostic efficacy of conventional smears and liquid-based cytology smears was equivalent in the majority of cases (n = 171, 68.4%). Conventional smears were better than liquid-cased cytology smears in 34 (13.6%) cases, and liquid-based cytology smears were better than conventional smears in eight (3.2%) cases. Liquid-based cytology smears showed a higher unsatisfactory rate compared to conventional Smears (15.6% vs. 5.2%). The sensitivity and specificity of conventional smears were 84.6% and 94.4%, respectively, compared to 68.7% and 92.4%, respectively, of liquid-based cytology smears. Conclusions Conventional smears are a cost-effective and easy method for diagnosing thyroid nodules. Liquid-based cytology smears can be used in association with conventional smears to enhance the accuracy of the evaluation of malignant thyroid nodules.

Diagnostic Value of Preparing Additional Liquid-Based Cytology Slides and Cell Blocks from Residue Material in Thyroid fine Needle Aspiration

Background and Aims

After liquid-based cytology (LBC) technique developed for cervical cytology, it has been used for nongynecological samples and has been very successful. It offers having extra slides of the samples for further examination and ancillary tests. Moreover, cell blocks can be formed from the residue material. The study aimed to evaluate the importance of preparing a second LBC slide or a cell block from the residue material of thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) samples to reach a definitive diagnosis in cases diagnosed as nondiagnostic (ND) after the first slide.

Material and Methods

Seventy five cases diagnosed as ND after the first slide were included in study. For 50 cases, the second LBC slides were prepared (LBC group); for 25 cases, cell block was performed from residue material (CB group). Two groups were compared in terms of reaching a definitive diagnosis.

Results

At the end of secondary procedures, a definitive diagnosis was reached in a total of 24 cases (32%). Twenty of 50 cases (40%) in LBC group reached a definitive diagnosis while four cases (16%) in the CB group reached a definitive diagnosis. Achieving a definitive diagnosis was found statistically higher in the LBC group in which the second slide was formed compared to the CB group (P =0.036).

Conclusion

Preparing a second slide with LBC method is more purposive than preparing a cell block from the residue material of thyroid FNA samples. Reducing the percentage of ND cases will protect patients from complications and morbidity that may arise from repeated FNA.

Deep Learning-Based Screening of Urothelial Carcinoma in Whole Slide Images of Liquid-Based Cytology Urine Specimens

Urinary cytology is a useful, essential diagnostic method in routine urological clinical practice. Liquid-based cytology (LBC) for urothelial carcinoma screening is commonly used in the routine clinical cytodiagnosis because of its high cellular yields. Since conventional screening processes by cytoscreeners and cytopathologists using microscopes is limited in terms of human resources, it is important to integrate new deep learning methods that can automatically and rapidly diagnose a large amount of specimens without delay. The goal of this study was to investigate the use of deep learning models for the classification of urine LBC whole-slide images (WSIs) into neoplastic and non-neoplastic (negative). We trained deep learning models using 786 WSIs by transfer learning, fully supervised, and weakly supervised learning approaches. We evaluated the trained models on two test sets, one of which was representative of the clinical distribution of neoplastic cases, with a combined total of 750 WSIs, achieving an area under the curve for diagnosis in the range of 0.984-0.990 by the best model, demonstrating the promising potential use of our model for aiding urine cytodiagnostic processes.

Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology for Parotid Tumors

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is widely used in clinical practice as a simple and minimally invasive test for parotid tumors that allows for preoperative estimation of benignancy and malignancy, histological type, and malignancy grade and can be performed on an outpatient basis. In recent years, cell blocks prepared with core needle biopsy (CNB) and liquid-based cytology (LBC) have increased the reliability of immunostaining and molecular biological testing, leading to improved diagnostic accuracy. In 2018, the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology was introduced, but it does not include malignancy grade or histological type, so we proposed the Osaka Medical College classification as a more clinically based cell classification that includes both types of information, and we have reported on its usefulness. This review gives an overview of the history and use of FNA and describes CNB and LBC and the two classification systems.

Diagnostic accuracy of Thinprep® in cervical lymph node aspiration: Assessment according to the Sydney system

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a reliable technique that has been used for many years in lymphadenopathy diagnosis. Although conventional smear is the standard approach in FNAC, liquid-based cytology (LBC) is accepted as an alternative method. Reporting standardization is a significant gap in fine-needle aspiration cytology, leading to failure in pathologist-clinician dialog and interobserver variability. In 2020, an expert panel proposed the Sydney system for classifying and reporting lymph node aspiration cytology. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of LBC in lymph node aspiration cytology under the guidance of the Sydney system.

METHODS

Five hundred-four LBC samples were reevaluated and classified according to the Sydney system. Of these, n = 24 were categorized as L1-inadequate/non-diagnostic, n = 283 as L2-benign, n = 36 as L3- atypical cells of undetermined significance/atypical lymphoid cells of uncertain significance (AUS/ALUS), n = 48 as L4-suspicious, and n = 113 as L5-malignant. Four hundred-one samples were histopathologically confirmed. The diagnostic accuracy of LBC and the risk of malignancy for each Sydney category were calculated.

RESULTS

The results were as follows: sensitivity 98.97%; specificity 98.60%; positive predictive value 94.80%; negative predictive value 99.29%; and overall diagnostic accuracy 98.75%. The ROM was 16.6% for L1, 0.7% for L2, 88.8% for L3, and 100% for L4 and L5.

CONCLUSION

LBC is suitable for use in lymph node aspiration under the guidance of the Sydney system and has high diagnostic accuracy. Future comprehensive studies will increase the applicability of the Sydney system and minimize interobserver variability.

Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears

Context:

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is a cyto-preparatory technique that may be applied to fine-needle aspiration (FNA) samples. However, its efficacy over conventional smears (CS) in thyroid is controversial.

Aims:

The aim of this study was to compare CS versus LBC (SurePath, BD) preparations in thyroid FNA samples for diagnostic efficacy.

Settings and Design:

Prospective case-control study using split sample analysis in 200 non-consecutive cases of thyroid FNA reported as per the Bethesda system.

Methods and Material:

Detailed cytomorphological features were evaluated in CS and LBC preparations. Cellularity was scored as 0–3. Based on diagnostic efficacy, they were categorized into three groups:(i) CS and LBC equivalent for diagnosis, (ii) CS better than LBC, and (iii) LBC better than CS for providing the diagnosis.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Paired t test for cellularity scores and descriptive for diagnostic efficacy.

Results:

There were 7 unsatisfactory, 118 benign, 10 atypia or follicular lesion of undetermined significance, 25 follicular neoplasms, 6 suspicious for malignancy, and 34 malignant thyroid FNA cases based on routine conventional smears. Cellularity of conventional smears was significantly higher than paired LBC smears (paired t test, P < 0.005). Comparison of overall diagnostic efficacy showed that LBC and CS were equivalent in 59% of cases; CS was superior to LBC in 37% cases and LBC was better than CS in 4% cases only. LBC smears showed higher unsatisfactory rate as compared to CS (18% vs. 3.5%). In category 2, the two techniques were equivalent in 87% of cases. In categories 4 and 6, CS were superior to LBC.

Conclusions:

In thyroid FNA cases, conventional smears are superior to LBC preparation in terms of cellularity and diagnostic efficacy and hence, LBC preparations should not replace conventional smears for making a routine cytomorphological diagnosis.

Comparison of Diagnostic Rates and Concordance with Subsequent Surgical Resections between Conventional Smear and ThinPrep Preparations versus ThinPrep Only in Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration (T-FNA) Specimens

BACKGROUND

Thyroid fine needle aspiration (T-FNA) is a mainstay in management of thyroid nodules. However, the preparation of T-FNA specimens varies across institutions. Prior studies have compared diagnostic rates between different specimen preparations of T-FNA specimens and their associated advantages and disadvantages. However, few have compared the rates of all diagnostic categories of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) between liquid-based preparations (LBPs) and a combination of LBP and conventional smear (CS) preparations. Our study compares TBSRTC diagnostic rates between these 2 cohorts and correlates cytologic diagnoses with subsequent thyroid resections to evaluate rates of neoplasia (RON) and malignancy (ROM).

METHODS

584 consecutive thyroid FNA specimens were collected and stratified by preparation type (ThinPrep [TP] vs. CS &amp; TP). Diagnostic rates for each TBSRTC diagnostic category were calculated. The institution's electronic medical records database was searched for histologic diagnoses of previously sampled thyroid nodules to evaluate the RON and ROM.

RESULTS

Of 584 thyroid FNA specimens, 73 (12.5%) and 511 (87.5%) were evaluated by TP only and CS &amp; TP, respectively, reflecting the predominance of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) with CS for T-FNAs at our institution. Of the TP only and CS &amp; TP cohorts, 29 (39.7%) and 98 (19.2%) had subsequent resections, respectively. The frequency of non-diagnostic cases was lower in the CS &amp; TP cohort (12.7% vs. 26%). While the diagnostic rate of follicular lesion of undetermined significance was similar for both cohorts, SFN categorization was only utilized in the CS &amp; TP cohort (1.5% vs. 0%). Although RON and ROM were similar between cohorts in many of the TBSRTC categories, there was a higher RON associated with non-diagnostic specimens in the TP only cohort when the denominator included all non-diagnostic cases.

CONCLUSION

The combination of CS and LBP may potentially decrease the non-diagnostic rate of T-FNA specimens as well as the number of passes required for diagnosis, particularly with ROSE. Evaluation of morphologic features highlighted in conventional smears may facilitate diagnostic categorization in the "suspicious for follicular neoplasm" category.

Evaluation of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsies according to Cytological Methods and Comparison with Histopathological Diagnosis

Objectives:

In this study, we aim to compare the results of aspiration of thyroid nodules evaluated according to the Bethesda category (BC) with tissue diagnoses in the operation materials and to compare the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rates according to cytology methods.

Methods:

The previous fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of thyroid nodules of 879 cases diagnosed histopathologically between 2010 and 2017 was examined. The FNAB results determined according to the Bethesda system were matched with tissue diagnoses, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates were investigated according to cytology methods.

Results:

Sensitivity, specificity, Positive predictive value (PPV), Negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy rates were found in all FNAB results (in units of %; Sensitivity; 84.7, Specificity; 81.1, PPV; 74.1, NPV; 89.2, Accuracy; 82.5). All of the cytological evaluation methods of thyroid FNABs were found to be reliable and effective (Generally, the results are 80% and above). Specificity and accuracy rates were close to the general average (82.5%) in all methods. However, in cases evaluated with liquid base cytology (LBC) method and in addition to LBC or conventional smear (CS), the sensitivity rates in cases where cell block (CB) were evaluated together were higher than cases in which LBC and CS were used alone (92.6% and 91.0%). When examined statistically, there was no significant difference concerning sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rates of cytological methods (p>0.05, respectively, p=0.576, 0.065, 0.643).

Conclusion:

In cytopathology, when evaluating thyroid aspirations, it is seen that the LBC method is used instead of CS. In our study, we recommend the use of the LBC method, which seems to have the highest sensitivity (taking into account its technical advantages), instead of CS. However, we think that both CS and LBC methods should be evaluated by supporting them with cell block sections.

Optimizing cytological specimens of EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions: A pilot study to the effect of a smear preparation training for endoscopy personnel on sample quality and accuracy

BACKGROUND

In the absence of rapid on-side pathological evaluation, endoscopy staff generally "smears" endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) specimens on a glass slide. As this technique is vulnerable to preparation artifacts, we assessed if its quality could be improved through a smear-preparation-training for endoscopy staff.

METHODS

In this prospective pilot study, 10 endosonographers and 12 endoscopy nurses from seven regional EUS-centers in the Netherlands were invited to participate in a EUS-FNA smear-preparation-training. Subsequently, post training slides derived from solid pancreatic lesions were compared to pre-training "control" slides. Primary outcome was to assess if the training positively affects smear quality and, consequently, diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions.

RESULTS

Participants collected and prepared 71 cases, mostly pancreatic head lesions (48%). Sixty-eight controls were selected from the pretraining period. The presence of artifacts was comparable for smears performed before and after training (76% vs 82%, P = .36). Likewise, smear cellularity (≥50% target cells) before and after training did not differ (44% (30/68) vs 49% (35/71), P = .48). Similar, no difference in diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was detected (P = .10).

CONCLUSION

In this pilot EUS-FNA smear-preparation-training for endoscopy personnel, smear quality and diagnostic accuracy were not improved after the training. Based on these results, we plan to further study other training programs and possibilities.

Comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology in the evaluation of abdominal masses

Context

Liquid-based cytology.

Aims

Utility of liquid-based cytology (LBC) was compared to conventional smear cytology in ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates of abdominal masses.

Settings and Design

This was a prospective comparative study conducted in collaboration with surgery and pediatrics surgery departments of our institute.

Subjects and Methods

Thirty patients presenting with evidence of abdominal mass were enrolled for the study and underwent fine-needle aspiration cytology. The material was processed for the preparation of conventional smears and residual material was rinsed into cytolyt for LBC by Thin Prep method and into cell block fluid. The smears prepared from both the methods were compared by two independent and experienced pathologists for adequacy, cellularity, architectural pattern, cytoplasmic preservation, nuclear preservation, and background.

Results

: Cellularity was frequently higher in the conventional smears than on Thin Prep slides (P value = 0.025). Recognition of architecture was better on the conventional smears (P value = 0.001). Cytoplasm was better preserved on the conventional smears (P value = 0.001) but difference in the preservation of nuclear details was not statistically significant on slides prepared from both the techniques. The background of Thin Prep slides is significantly cleaner than direct smears (P value = 0.001). Non epithelial elements such as mucin and neurofibrillary tangles were better preserved on direct smears (P value = 0.001) but diagnostic accuracy of both the methodologies showed no statistically significant difference (P value = 0.226).

Conclusions

The Thin Prep technique utilizes expensive equipment and reagents. It also generates certain morphological artefacts in slides with which a cytologist needs to get familiar. When used in isolation, it may not consistently provide any added advantage in the diagnosis of such lesions and should be used as an adjunct to conventional smears. It may be preferred in situations where material has to be transported for processing or is required for ancillary tests.

Fine needle aspiration cytology of cervical lymph nodes: Comparison of liquid based cytology (SurePath) and conventional preparation

BACKGROUND

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the first diagnostic step in patient with cervical lymphadenopathy because of its simplicity, safety and early availability of the results. Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is an alternative processing method which is used for both gynecological and nongynecological samples. Literature reviewed show few studies comparing LBC with conventional preparation (CP).

AIM

The present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of LBC and comparison of LBC and CP in cervical lymphadenopathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, a total of 75 cases of FNAC with cervical lymphadenopathy were included. The first pass was used for CP followed by LBC with the use of SurePath (SP) technique. Both the smears were compared for cellularity, background containing blood, cell debris, lymphoglandular bodies, stromal fragments, cytoarchitectural pattern, etc., by semiquantitative scoring system.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in the cellularity, cell architecture, and monolayer cells (P > .05). On the basis of background containing blood, cell debris, lympho-glandular bodies, stromal fragments (P < .001), nuclear, and cytoplasmic details (P < .05), LBC was found to be superior to CP.

CONCLUSION

LBC is a relatively simple technique and superior to CP in respect of better nuclear and cytoplasmic details with loss of background blood and debris. It has a diagnostic accuracy equivalent to that of CP. However, use of both LBC and CP can result in better diagnostic accuracy.

Small but powerful: the promising role of small specimens for biomarker testing

Emphasis on the use of small specimens for biomarker testing to provide prognostic and predictive information for guiding clinical management for patients with advanced-stage cancer has been increasing. These biomarker tests include molecular analysis, cytogenetic tests, and immunohistochemical assays. Owing to the limited nature of the cellular material procured in these small specimens, which are collected using minimally invasive techniques (ie, fine needle aspiration and core needle biopsy), pathologists have been required to triage these samples judiciously and provide the clinically relevant genomic information required for patient care. Awareness of the advantages and limitations of these specimen preparations and the specific preanalytic requirements for the testing methods will help pathologists to develop optimal strategies to maximize the chances of effectively using these samples for comprehensive diagnostic and relevant biomarker testing.

Comparison of Two Different Methods of Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy and Histopathology for Thyroid Nodules

OBJECTIVE

 Two different methods for fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of thyroid nodules (multi-pass conventional smear, MPCS; single-pass liquid-based cytology, SPLBC) were evaluated regarding the magnitude of nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory sampling ratio, and basic demographic and ultrasonographic (USG) factors to predict such outcome.

METHODS

 One thousand FNAB patients were retrospectively assessed. Of them, 517 nodules were evaluated with the conventional smear method, and the rest were evaluated with liquid-based cytology method using the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. FNAB technique had certain procedural differences for both pathological methods. For conventional smear, a modified "needle-only" technique with three independent passes was performed, whereas a single pass was used for liquid-based cytology. The reduction of nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory results constituted the basis of this study. Pathological results, therefore, were subgrouped under "nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory" (Category I), "benign" (Category II), and "atypia/neoplasia/malignancy" (Category III-VI).

RESULTS

 Both FNAB groups were not statistically different or only slightly different regarding size (P = 0.196), echogenicity (P = 0.014), and the presence of echogenic foci (P = 0.11), therefore considered to have equal USG properties. In MPCS method, the nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory rate (i.e., Category I) was 24%. Other cytological results were as follows: Category II (67.1%), Category III-VI (8.8%). In SPLBC method, the nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory rate (i.e., Category I) was 14.5%. Other cytological results were as follows: Category II (77.6%), Category III-VI (7.8%). A significant difference was found between two sampling methods regarding pathological results (Independent samples t-test, P < 0.0001). The demographic and USG factors, considered in this study, did not offer a successful prediction of nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory outcomes.

CONCLUSION

 SPLBC has significantly lower (14.5% vs 24%) nondiagnostic rate than MPCS, and higher 77.6% vs 67.1%) Category II rate than MPCS. This may point to the possibility that MPCS method undercategorizes many benign (i.e., Category II) nodules under nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory category. The success of the former is due to the elimination of confounding material during the process. Single pass, also, increases patient comfort and compliance, and has additional advantages for the interventionalist, as it obviates the need to smear aspirates. This dramatically decreases the actual duration of the biopsy procedure and is free of interventionalist expertise for smearing.

Comparison of the Diagnostic Utility of Manual Screening and the ThinPrep Imaging System in Liquid-Based Cervical Cytology

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic results of the ThinPrep manual method (TPMM) and ThinPrep automated method (TPAM) in liquid-based cytology and present the advantages and disadvantages of both methods.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A total of 1.500 randomized ThinPrep Pap tests that were screened manually and archived in 2015 were reviewed by a blinded researcher manually and by the ThinPrep automatic method.

RESULTS

There was a 83.3% increase in the detection of ASCUS (Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) with the TPAM compared to the TPMM, and with respect to the reference results, the accuracy was higher for the TPAM than for the TPMM. We also noted a 33.3% increase in the rate of LSIL (Low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) and 20% increase in the rate of HSIL (High grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) by the TPAM. Concordance was best between the TPAM and reference cytologic diagnoses. The sensitivity was higher for the TPAM and the specificity was similar for both methods. The false positive rate was higher for the TPAM than the TPMM but the false negative rate was higher for the TPMM. We determined a 30% gain in screening time per smear by the TPAM. However, rejection of many samples by the system, especially because of air bubbles, was a limitation of the TPAM.

CONCLUSION

The TPAM has advantages over the TPMM as well as disadvantages such as limiting features and a high false positive rate. The TPAM should be supported by the manual method to decrease the false positive rate.

Comparison of cytological adequacy and pain scale score in ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid thyroid nodules for liquid-based cytology with with 23- and 25-gauge needles: a single-center prospective study

In ultrasound (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of solid thyroid nodules (STN) using liquid-based cytology (LBC), the most appropriate needle size for LBC remains unclear. This study compared the cytological adequacy and complications associated with using 23- and 25-gauge needles in US-guided FNA of STNs using LBC. US-guided FNA was performed in consecutive patients by one radiologist to diagnose STNs ≥ 5 mm in the largest diameter. The one-sampling technique through a single needle puncture and multiple to-and-fro needle motions was used in each patient. The 23- and 25-guage needles were used consecutively each day. After FNA, the pain and complications experienced by each patient were investigated by a nurse, who was blinded to the information of needle gauge used. A cytopathologist retrospectively analyzed the cytological adequacy and cellularity of the cases. Of the 99 STNs, eight (8.1%) exhibited inadequate cytology (4 each with 23- and 25-gauge needles). The rate of cytological adequacy was not statistically different between the groups (p = 0.631). The mean pain scale values with 23- and 25-gauge needles were 2.1 ± 1.3 and 1.6 ± 1.3, respectively (p = 0.135). There were no significant complications in either group. In conclusion, both 23- and 25-gauge needles are useful in LBC because cytological adequacy and complications were not statistically different with both sizes of the needles.

Comparative Analysis of Liquid based and Conventional Cytology Smears in Fine Needle Aspirates from Breast Lesions

Context

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is being extensively used for the evaluation of both gynecological and non-gynecological specimens. Suspension of cells in monolayer makes better morphological assessment possible. Along with this, inherent morphological changes such as altered, reduced, or lost background material, fragmented cell clusters, smaller cell size, nucleolar prominence, etc., need to be considered.

Aim

Present study was aimed at comparative evaluation of utility of LBC versus conventional smear (CS) in assessing breast lesions and whether it can be used as an alternative to conventional preparation.

Settings and Design

Present study was a prospective study in which 75 cases of breast fine-needle aspiration cytology from patients with palpable breast lumps constituted the study group.

Material and Methods

The first pass was used for CS and LBC; a second pass was given. The representative CS and LBC smears were compared using several criteria.

Statistics

Each feature was scored individually and evaluated statistically using Wilcoxon's signed rank test on the SPSS program.

Results

A statistically significant difference was found in informative background and background blood-debris, whereas the difference was not statistically significant in other features such as cellularity, cytoarchitectural pattern, presence of monolayer, and nuclear and cytoplasmic details.

Conclusion

LBC is a promising technique in the field of cytology. It has the potential to decrease the number of slides screened per case and decrease the turn-around-time.

Comparison of Conventional Cytology, Liquid-Based Cytology, and Cell Block in the Evaluation of Peritoneal Fluid in Gynecology Malignancies

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal washing cytology has become an accepted method in evaluating gynecology malignancies.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to compare the conventional cytology, liquid-based cytology (LBC), and cell block in the evaluation of peritoneal fluid.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 48 cases with ovarian and uterine malignancy were included in this study. The age of the patients varied from 15 to 71 years. All the 48 cases were subjected to conventional smear, LBC, and cell block preparation.

RESULTS

The results of LBC and conventional methods were in line with all cytological criteria, except for the background (p = 0.045), but no significant difference was found regarding adequacy (p = 0.12), cellularity (p = 0.13), cell architecture (p = 0.751), nuclear details (p = 0.96), and cytoplasmic details (p = 0.32). The kappa correlation between conventional cytology and LBC, conventional cytology and cell block, and LBC and cell block was 0.769, 0.791, and 0.945, respectively. The most prevalent malignancy which led to peritoneal fluid involvement was papillary serous carcinoma of the ovary.

CONCLUSION

Compared to conventional cytology, the liquid-based method had no significant superiority in the evaluation of the peritoneal fluid method, but the combined usage of smears and cell block improved the diagnostic accuracy of the peritoneal washing samples in different gynecological malignancies.

Feasibility Study for the MALDI-MSI Analysis of Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsies: Evaluating the Morphological and Proteomic Stability Over Time

PURPOSE

MALDI-MS imaging (MALDI-MSI) is an emerging technology that enables the spatial distribution of biomolecules within tissue to be combined with the traditional morphological information familiar to clinicians. Thus, for diagnostic or prognostic purposes, along with predicting response to therapeutic treatment, it is important to properly collect and handle biological specimens in order to avoid degradation or the formation of artifacts in the morphological structure and proteomic profile.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In this work, the morphological and proteomic stability of thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsies in PreservCyt (up to 14 days) and CytoLyt (up to 7 days) solutions at 4 °C has been verified, by MALDI-MSI analysis. Moreover, a new measure has been introduced in order to assess the similarity of the obtained MALDI-MSI spectra, by equally taking into account the number of signals (fit and retrofit), and their intensities (Spearman's correlation and spectra overlap).

RESULTS

Results show no degradation of the cellular morphology and a good stability of the samples up to 14 days in PreservCyt solution.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Moreover, this protocol can be easily implemented in pathological units, allowing simple sample collection and shipment to be used not only for the proteomic MALDI-MSI analysis of thyroid FNABs but also for other biological liquid based specimens.

A study of the application of fiberoptic bronchoscopy combined with liquid-based cytology test in the early diagnosis of lung cancer

Application value of fiberoptic bronchoscopy combined with liquid-based cytology test (LCT) in the early diagnosis of lung cancer was investigated. Clinical data of 901 patients who had suspicious lung space-occupying lesions and underwent bronchoscopy combined with LCT in Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital from June 2012 to June 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into four groups to receive different fiberoptic bronchoscopies combined with LCT. Patients in Group A (n=276) received bronchoscopic washing cultures (BWC), Group B (n=204) received bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), Group C (n=187) underwent endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and Group D (n=234) underwent transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB). All patients received pathological biopsy to confirm the lesions. The diagnostic results of lung cancer and the incidence rates of postoperative adverse reactions/complications were analyzed and compared among the four groups. Among 901 patients, 741 cases were pathologically diagnosed with lung cancer. In Group A, there were 224 cases diagnosed with lung cancer, of which 193 cases were successfully detected with a detection rate of 86.17% and a κ-value of 0.426. In Group B, 171 cases were diagnosed with lung cancer, of which 149 cases were successfully detected with a detection rate of 87.13% and a κ-value of 0.430. In Group C, 154 cases were diagnosed with lung cancer, of which 146 cases were successfully detected with a detection rate of 94.81% and a κ-value of 0.769. In Group D, 192 cases were diagnosed with lung cancer, of which 170 cases were successfully detected with a detection rate of 88.54% and a κ-value of 0.440. Therefore, we conclude that fiberoptic bronchoscopy combined with LCT technique is safe and reliable for the diagnosis of the early-stage lung cancer.

Liquid-based cytology versus conventional cytology in fine-needle aspirates of salivary gland neoplasms

Background

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is a method of retrieving and processing of cytological material for the assessment of both gynecological and nongynecological cases introduced in 1996. Mostly conventional smears (CS) are prepared in Indian scenario; however, due to increasing popularity of LBC in nongynecology specimens, LBC is also used in few centers for diagnosing salivary gland neoplasm.

Aim

The aim of this study is to compare CS and LBC in fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the salivary gland neoplasms in terms of cytomorphological details, adequacy, ease of interpretation, pitfalls, and diagnostic efficiency.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a prospective, observational, comparative study which included 64 salivary gland neoplasms. Both CS and LBC (SurePath) were prepared as per standard protocols and examined.

Results and Conclusion

In our study, specificity and positive predictive value of both the techniques (conventional and LBC) were found to be 100%. Sensitivity of both the techniques was found to be similar (66.7%). Negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of conventional technique were found to be almost similar to that of LBC technique (97.6% vs. 97.2% and 97.7% vs. 97.4%). In terms of adequacy and cellularity, CSs were better than LBC. Ease of interpretation was better with CSs due to abundant chondromyxoid stroma, an important clue in the diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma. Nuclear details and background were better in LBC as compared to CS. Hence, we conclude that in salivary gland FNAC, both CS and LBC have similar diagnostic efficiency. however, interpretation of conventional smears is easier than Liquid Based Cytology especially in cases of pleomorphic adenoma. However, some advantages of LBC in respect to conventional cytology, with better-preserved morphology obtained from LBC becomes furthermore obligatory.

A novel solution configuration on liquid-based endometrial cytology

OBJECTIVE

Early detection and diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma and precancerous change would undoubtedly become the most alluring part for researchers. With the emergence of endometrial brush samplers, a new upsurge in endometrial cytology is in the making. But endometrial specimens obtained by the endometrial brush samplers require special preservation solution. The objective of this study is to develop a new kind of endometrial-cell preservation solution and to test the availability compared with a patented liquid-based cell preservation solution.

METHODS

In this controlled study, we had 5 endometrial cases collected with Li Brush from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (09/2016 to 12/2016). The samples of each case were collected 2 times separately and perserved in different perservation solutions. One was a kind of novel endometrial cell preservation solution and the other was a kind of patented liquid-based cell (LBC) preservation solution. The endometrial cells were smeared on slides by using the ZP-C automated slide preparation system and stained with Papanicolaou stain. A semi-quantitative scoring system was used to analyze the quality of slides. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test on the SPSS program (SPSS 18.0). In all LBC preparations, endometrial cells from the novel endometrial cells preservation solution had more cell quantity, less red blood cell fragments, and the background was cleaner compared with control group. Although the novel endometrial-cell preservation solution showed cellularity and absence of blood and debris expressed by no statistically significant differences (p = 0.063 and 0.102 respectively). The preservation period of the two kinds of liquids was equivalent.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel endometrial-cell preservation solution is superior to the liquid-base cell preservation solution for cervical cells, with clear background, diagnostic cells and low cost.

Diagnostic Utility and Efficacy of Conventional Versus SurePath® Liquid-based Cytology in Head and Neck Pathology: A Study in an Indian Tertiary Care Hospital

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is an emerging pathological method for better establishment of the diagnosis in almost all the organs of the body. It is currently used both for the gynecological and non-gynecological (fine-needle aspirates (FNAs)/fluid) specimens in most of the developed and few developing countries. The current study aimed at assessing and illustrating the cytological morphology on SurePath® LBC technique when used on FNAs from head and neck lesions, compared to the conventional smears (CS).

METHODS

In the current prospective study, a total of 1000 FNAs obtained from swellings of head and neck region were simultaneously processed both by the standard conventional and SurePath® LBC techniques. Both of these preparations were studied, compared with a semi-quantitative scoring system, and statistically analyzed. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

LBC smears were better, compared to CS ones, due to the presence of evenly dispersed cells (P≤0.001), clearance of obscuring elements / background debris (P≤0.001), and better cellular details (P≤0.001). However, these abilities of LBC often became its own nemesis and made the interpretation difficult.

CONCLUSION

LBC, though costly, is an acceptable, simple, and valuable technique. However, CS still cannot be considered inferior to it, and it is recommended that in most of the cases LBC, along with CS, should be reported before reaching a final diagnosis. This is beneficial especially in the developing countries such as India where most of the centers are devoid of LBC technique and hence, are not familiar with many cytomorphological features and potential diagnostic pitfalls unique to it.

Thyroid Cytology in India: Contemporary Review and Meta-analysis

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a screening test for triaging thyroid nodules, aiding in subsequent clinical management. However, the advantages have been overshadowed by the multiplicity of reporting systems and a wide range of nomenclature used. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) was formulated in 2007, to give the world a uniform thyroid cytology reporting system, facilitating easy interpretation by the clinicians. Here, we review the status of thyroid FNAC in India in terms of various reporting systems used including a meta-analysis of the previously published data. An extensive literature search was performed using internet search engines. The reports with detailed classification system used in thyroid cytology were included. The meta-analysis of published data was compared with the implied risk of malignancy by TBSRTC. More than 50 studies were retrieved and evaluated. TBSRTC is currently the most widely used reporting system with different studies showing good efficacy and interobserver concordance. Ancillary techniques have, as of now, limited applicability and acceptability in thyroid cytology in India. Twenty-eight published articles met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. When compared with TBSRTC recommendations, the meta-analysis showed a higher risk of malignancy for categories I and III. Thyroid FNAC is practiced all over India. TBSRTC has found widespread acceptance, with most institutions using this system for routine thyroid cytology reporting. However, reasons for a high malignancy risk for categories I and III need to be looked into. Various possible contributing factors are discussed in the review.

Usefulness of conventional transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis, staging and molecular characterization of pulmonary neoplasias by thin-prep based cytology: experience of a single oncological institute

BACKGROUND

Conventional transbronchial needle aspiration (c-TBNA) contributed to improve the bronchoscopic examination, allowing to sample lesions located even outside the tracheo-bronchial tree and in the hilo-mediastinal district, both for diagnostic and staging purposes.

METHODS

We have evaluated the sensitivity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the c-TBNA performed during the 2005-2015 period for suspicious lung neoplasia and/or hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy at the Thoracic endoscopy of the Thoracic Surgery Department of the Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome. Data from 273 consecutive patients (205 males and 68 females) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 158 (58%) adequate specimens, 112 (41%) were neoplastic or contained atypical cells, 46 (17%) were negative or not diagnostic. We considered in the analysis first the overall period; then we compared the findings of the first [2005-2011] and second period [2012-2015] and, finally, only those of adequate specimens. During the overall period, sensibility and accuracy values were respectively of 53% and 63%, in the first period they reached 41% and 53% respectively; in the second period sensibility and accuracy reached 60% and 68%. Considering only the adequate specimens, sensibility and accuracy during the overall period were respectively of 80% and 82%; the values obtained for the first period were 68% and 72%. Finally, in the second period, sensibility reached 86% and accuracy 89%. Carcinoma-subtyping was possible in 112 cases, adenocarcinomas being diagnosed in 50 cases; further, in 30 cases molecular predictive data could be obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

The c-TBNA proved to be an efficient method for the diagnosis/staging of lung neoplasms and for the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Endoscopist's skill and technical development, associated to thin-prep cytology and to a rapid on site examination (ROSE), were able to provide by c-TBNA a high diagnostic yield and molecular predictive data in advanced lung carcinomas.

A diagnostic head and neck fine needle aspiration service can be provided using liquid-based cytology only

OBJECTIVE

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) has been used for non-gynaecological specimens since its introduction into routine use in cervical cytology in the mid-1990s. There are still relatively few large studies comparing performance in reporting the head and neck fine-needle aspirations (H&N FNA) processed by LBC only to conventional direct smears (CDS).

METHODS

This study compared 686 H&N FNAs processed by LBC only with 3719 CDS. All were taken under ultrasound (US) guidance by a small cohort of three consultant radiologists and reported by the author.

RESULTS

The (smaller) LBC sample was statistically representative of the larger CDS population at an alpha level of 0.05. There was no difference between CDS and LBC at a 95% confidence interval (CI) when comparing specificity and sensitivity (specificity: 94.8-96.5% versus 90.2-95.4%; sensitivity: 91.4-94.1% versus 86.8-93.4%). The inadequate rate between the two techniques was similar, 0.5-1.0% for CDS versus 0.7-2.5% for LBC. The significance difference was in the suspicious rate which was greater at 2.8-5.8% for LBC versus 1.7-2.6% for CDS. Consequently, there was a slight but non-significant difference between the two populations with respect to the overall accuracy: 93.5-95.1% for CDS versus 89.4-93.7% for LBC.

CONCLUSIONS

While there are morphological differences between LBC and CDS in H&N FNAs, once a degree of familiarity is achieved, the two techniques have equivalent sensitivity, specificity and inadequate rates.

Diagnostic value of liquid-based cytology with fine needle aspiration specimens for cervical lymphadenopathy

Background

Cervical lymphadenopathy is a symptom that is frequently seen among outpatients, and it is important to differentiate malignant lesions from reactive lymphoid hyperplasia. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology has been widely used for the diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy. However, some limitations of the diagnostic accuracy using conventional smear (CS) cytology have been pointed out. The diagnostic value of liquid‐based cytology (LBC) with FNA specimens has not yet been fully proven.

Methods

Forty‐two patients with cervical lymphadenopathy who underwent FNA with CS cytology from 2007 to 2011 and 123 patients who underwent FNA with LBC utilizing LBCPREP2™ from 2011 to 2015 were studied. Diagnostic values were compared between the CS and the LBC groups.

Results

Of the total 165 patients representing the combined CS and LBC groups, 81 (49.1%) were diagnosed as benign lymph node and 84 (50.9%) were malignant diseases including 37 (22.4%) of metastatic carcinoma except for thyroid carcinoma, 30 (18.2%) of metastatic thyroid carcinoma, and 17 (10.3%) of malignant lymphoma. The overall statistical values including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the CS were 75%, 100%, 100%, 78.9%, and 87.1%, respectively, whereas those values for LBC were 91.2%, 100%, 100%, 90.7%, and 95.3%, respectively. The sensitivity of LBC for malignant diseases tended to be higher than that of CS cytology (p = 0.081).

Conclusion

LBC with FNA specimens from cervical lymphadenopathy is a useful and reliable method for the diagnosis of malignant diseases, especially of metastatic carcinomas, due to its increased sensitivity compared with CS cytology. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2016;44:169–176. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Utility of manual liquid-based cytology and conventional smears in the evaluation of various fine-needle aspiration samples

BACKGROUND

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) preparation is a way to improve and refine the fine-needle aspiration (FNA) samples. There are a few studies comparing LBC with conventional smear (CS).

AIM

The present study was undertaken to evaluate the utility of manual LBC (MLBC) and CS preparations in various FNA samples.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 100 FNA samples from various anatomical sites were evaluated using MLBC and CS preparations. Cellularity, blood, informative background, monolayers, cell architecture, cytoplasmic, and nuclear preservation were compared with MLBC and CS preparations by Wilcoxon signed rank test. P < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

MLBC preparations were superior to CS preparations in view of absence of blood and debris (P = 0.001), presence of monolayers (P < 0.001), and preservation of cytoplasmic (P = 0.001) and nuclear details (P = 0.001). However, no statistically significant differences were found between MLBC and CS preparations with regard to cellularity (P = 0.157), informative background (P = 0.083), and architecture (P = 0.739).

CONCLUSION

MLBC preparations in FNAC are a safe, easy, and less time-consuming procedure, and it may have promising diagnostic value in the evaluation of FNA samples from various anatomical sites. However, the use of both MLBC and CS preparations is recommended to achieve optimal diagnostic yield.

Lowered cutoff of lymph node fine-needle aspiration thyroglobulin in thyroid cancer patients with serum anti-thyroglobulin antibody

OBJECTIVE

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and measurement of thyroglobulin (Tg) in needle washout (FNA-Tg) are recommended for the diagnosis of metastatic or recurrent lymph nodes (LNs) in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). However, the effect of serum Tg antibody (TgAb) on FNA-Tg levels still remains unclear in the preoperative setting. We analyze the interference of serum TgAb on FNA-Tg levels as proof of concept in the diagnostic advantage of serum TgAb combined with FNA-Tg.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 370 suspicious cervical LNs from 273 patients with DTC were included. The primary tumor was confirmed as DTC on preoperative pathology in all patients. We performed FNA-Tg measurement and FNAC on suspicious LNs and evaluated the diagnostic performance of FNAC and FNA-Tg according to TgAb status. Final diagnoses were confirmed by histological examination of excised specimens or by follow-up ultrasonography for at least 6 months.

RESULTS

Data from 273 subjects with suspicious 370 LNs were evaluated. Fifty-five LNs (14.9%) were from TgAb+ positive serum TgAb (TgAb+) patients. Serum Tg and FNA-Tg levels were significantly lower in patients with TgAb+ than in those with TgAb-negative (TgAb-). Final pathology confirmed 109 LNs (29.5%) as malignant. Diagnostic performance of FNA-Tg at the same cutoff level was lower in the TgAb+ than TgAb- group. FNA-Tg cutoff levels determined by ROC curve were lower in the TgAb+ group.

CONCLUSION

The results suggested that the cutoff value of FNA-Tg should be lowered in suspicious LN before thyroidectomy in thyroid cancer patients with TgAb.