Laparoscopic modified subtotal cholecystectomy for difficult gall bladders: A single-centre experience

Endo-loop or interrupted suture closure of gallbladder remnant during laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy- a retrospective analysis of our experience at a high-volume centre of Eastern Nepal

INTRODUCTION

Subtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LSC) is a rescue procedure in difficult case, retaining all advantages of minimally invasive surgery. The most reputed definition of subtotal cholecystectomy is the removal of 3/4th of gallbladder with closure of the infundibulum. The closure of the infundibulum can be with either intracorporeal interrupted suture or pre-knotted endo-loop. This study aims to share our experience with the stump closure techniques (either interrupted suture closure or endo-loop closure) during LSC so that the result of the study helps surgeons to choose an appropriate technique of the stump closure.

METHODS

This study includes patients with indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy but who underwent LSC (Henneman's type C) because of intraoperative findings over last 5-years(2019-2024AD) in BPKIHS, a high-volume centre of the eastern Nepal.

RESULTS

Over last 5-years period, a total of 4578 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed, 120(2.6%) of which were subtotal. The patients who underwent LSC had male predominance with male/female ratio of 1.3:1 with mean age of 55.53 ± 7.45years (37-71 years). The most common pre-operative diagnosis in these patients who underwent LSC was uncomplicated gall bladder stone in 55(45.5%) patients and intraoperative finding was the frozen Calot in 50(41.7%) patients. Operative time (126.76 ± 26.85 versus 158.65 ± 17.15 min), intraoperative blood loss (210.29 ± 30.56 versus 246.15 ± 28.29 ml), minor stump leak rate (0/68 versus 20/52), length of hospital stay (2.78 ± 0.83 versus 3.58 ± 1.35days) and duration of the drain (5.97 ± 2.75 versus 9 ± 3.55 days) were significantly lower in the stump closure with endo-loop group in comparison to the stump closure with interrupted suture group with p-value < 0.05.

CONCLUSION

Nowadays, LSC is gaining preference over conversion to open procedure in difficult cholecystectomy cases. It is better to close the remnant stump of gallbladder with endo-loop to decrease biliary leak with addition advantage of shorter operative time, lesser intraoperative blood loss, shorter length of hospital stays and shorter duration of the drain placement. We recommend to close the remnant stump with endo-loop if the remnant stump is mobilized all around with intact and adequate length of all sides (including posterior one). However, the stump closure with interrupted suture should be opted if above mentioned criteria are not achieved.

Intraoperative imaging and management of common duct stones during subtotal cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Subtotal cholecystectomy is advocated in patients with severe inflammation and distorted anatomy preventing safe removal of the entire gallbladder. Not well documented in this surgically complex population is the feasibility of intraoperative imaging and management of common bile duct (CBD) stones. We evaluated these operative maneuvers in our subtotal cholecystectomy patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all cholecystectomy cases from 2014 to 2023 at a single Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center using VASQIP (VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program), selecting subtotal cholecystectomy cases for detailed analysis. We reviewed operative reports, imaging and laboratory studies, and clinical notes to understand biliary imaging, stone management, complications, and late outcomes including retained stones (within 6 months), and recurrent stones (beyond 6 months).

RESULTS

419 laparoscopic (n = 406) and open (n = 13) cholecystectomies were performed, including 40 subtotal cholecystectomies (36 laparoscopic, 4 laparoscopic converted to open). Among these 40 patients IOC was attempted in 35 and completed in 26, with successful stone management in 11 (9 common bile duct exploration [CBDE], 2 intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP]). In follow-up, 3 additional patients had CBD stones managed by ERCP, including 1 with a negative IOC and 2 without IOC. Thus, 14 (35%) of 40 patients had CBD stones. Of note, IOC permitted identification and oversewing or closure of the cystic duct in 32 patients. There were no major bile duct injuries and one cystic duct stump leak (2.5%) that resolved spontaneously.

CONCLUSIONS

Subtotal cholecystectomy patients had a high incidence of bile duct stones, with most detected and managed intraoperatively with CBDE, making a strong argument for routine IOC and single-stage care. When intraoperative imaging is not possible, postoperative imaging should be considered. Routine imaging, biliary clearance, and cystic duct closure during subtotal cholecystectomy is feasible in most patients with low rates of retained stones and bile leaks.

Application of 3-Step Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Difficult Cholecystitis

BACKGROUND

With the aging of the global population, the incidence rate of acute cholecystitis is increasing. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered as the first choice to treat acute cholecystitis. How to effectively avoid serious intraoperative complications such as bile duct and blood vessel injury is still a difficult problem that puzzles surgeons. This paper introduces the application of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a new surgical concept, in acute difficult cholecystitis.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis was carried out from January 2019 to January 2021. A total of 36 patients with acute difficult cholecystitis underwent 3-step laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The general information, clinical features, surgical methods, surgical results, and postoperative complications of the patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

All patients successfully completed the surgery, one of them was converted to laparotomy, and the other 35 cases were treated with 3-step laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Postoperative bile leakage occurred in 2 cases (5.56%), secondary choledocholithiasis in 1 case (2.78%), and hepatic effusion in 1 case (2.78%). No postoperative bleeding, septal infection, and other complications occurred, and no postoperative colon injury, gastroduodenal injury, liver injury, bile duct injury, vascular injury, and other surgery-related complications occurred. All 36 patients were discharged from hospital after successful recovery. No one died 30 days after surgery, and there was no abnormality in outpatient follow-up for 3 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-step laparoscopic cholecystectomy seems to be safer and more feasible for acute difficult cholecystitis patients. Compared with traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy or partial cholecystectomy, 3-step laparoscopic cholecystectomy has the advantages of safe surgery and less complications, which is worth trying by clinicians.

A systematic review on laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for difficult gallbladders: a lifesaving bailout or an incomplete operation?

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSTC) is a bailout procedure that is undertaken when it is not safe to proceed with a laparoscopic total cholecystectomy owing to dense adhesions in Calot's triangle. The main aim of this review was to investigate the early (≤30 days) and late (>30 days) morbidity and mortality of LSTC.

METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed® (MEDLINE®), Google Scholar™ and Embase® databases was conducted to identify all studies on LSTC published between 1985 and December 2020. A systematic review was then performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 45 studies involving 2,166 subtotal cholecystectomy patients (51% female) were identified for inclusion in the review. The mean patient age was 55 years (standard deviation: 15 years). Just over half (53%) of the patients had an elective procedure. The conversion rate was 6.2% (n=135). The most common indication was acute cholecystitis (49%). Different techniques were used, with the majority having a closed cystic duct/gallbladder stump (71%). The most common closure technique was intracorporeal suturing (53%), followed by endoloop closure (15%). Four patients (0.18%) died within thirty days of surgery. Morbidity within 30 days included bile duct injury (0.23%), bile leak (18%) and intra-abdominal collection (4%). Reoperation was reported in 23 patients (1.2%), most commonly for unresolving intra-abdominal collections and failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to control bile leak. Long-term follow-up was reported in 30 studies, the median follow-up duration being 22 months. Late morbidity included incisional hernias (6%), symptomatic gallstones (4%) and common bile duct stones (2%), with 2% of cases requiring completion of cholecystectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

LSTC is an acceptable alternative in patients with a "difficult" Calot's triangle.

D-line Approach for Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Initial Experience

Introduction The critical view of safety is an important concept for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, no standard step-by-step approach for achieving the critical view of safety has been established until now. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate a new approach for achieving the critical view of safety using the diagonal line of liver segment IV as an anatomical landmark. Patients and methods In this prospective non-randomized study, patients (n= 112) who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis were included. The first 47 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the diagonal line approach (DLC group) whereas, the next 65 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the conventional method (CLC group).  Results No significant difference between both groups regarding the preoperative characteristics, operative time, and intraoperative blood loss. Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy was performed more in the DLC group (6% vs 0%, p= 0.07). Whereas, in the CLC group, there was a tendency towards conversion to open cholecystectomy in difficult cases (6% vs 2%, p= 0.40). No intra- or postoperative complications occurred in either group.  Conclusion The diagonal line approach is a feasible and useful step-by-step technique to achieve the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and enables surgeons to perform safe laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in difficult cases.

Review of the Literature on Partial Resections of the Gallbladder, 1898-2022: The Outline of the Conception of Subtotal Cholecystectomy and a Suggestion to Use the Terms 'Subtotal Open-Tract Cholecystectomy' and 'Subtotal Closed-Tract Cholecystectomy'

Current descriptions of the history of subtotal cholecystectomy require more details and accuracy. This study presented a narrative review of the articles on partial resections of the gallbladder published between 1898 and 2022. The Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles items guided the style and content of this paper. The systematic literature search yielded 165 publications. Of them, 27 were published between 1898 and 1984. The evolution of the partial resections of the gallbladder began in the last decade of the 19th century when Kehr and Mayo performed them. The technique of partial resection of the gallbladder leaving the hepatic wall in situ was well known in the 3rd and 4th decades of the 20th century. In 1931, Estes emphasised the term 'partial cholecystectomy'. In 1947, Morse and Barb introduced the term 'subtotal cholecystectomy'. Madding and Farrow popularised it in 1955-1959. Bornman and Terblanche revitalised it in 1985. This term became dominant in 2014. From a subtotal cholecystectomy technical execution perspective, it is either a single-stage (when it includes only the resectional component) or two-stage (when it also entails closure of the remnant of the gallbladder or cystic duct) operation. Recent papers on classifications of partial resections of the gallbladder indicate the extent of gallbladder resection. Subtotal cholecystectomy is an umbrella term for incomplete cholecystectomies. 'Subtotal open-tract cholecystectomy' and 'subtotal closed-tract cholecystectomy' are terms that characterise the type of completion of subtotal cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopic Lumen-guided cholecystectomy in face of the difficult gallbladder

BACKGROUND

Where the critical view of safety cannot be established during cholecystectomy, certain salvage techniques are indicated to reduce the likelihood of bile duct injury. The present study describes a salvage technique termed the "laparoscopic lumen-guided cholecystectomy" (LLC) and reports its peri-operative outcomes.

METHOD

A summary of the technique is as follows: (1) Hartmann's pouch is incised and stones are evacuated; (2) the cystic anatomy is inspected from the inside of the gallbladder; (3) the lumen is used to guide retrograde dissection towards the cystic pedicle; (4) cystic duct control is achieved if deemed safe. LLC cases performed between June 2020 and January 2022 in a single health board were included. The operative details and peri-operative outcomes of the technique are reported and compared to cases of similar difficulty where the LLC was not attempted.

RESULTS

LLC was performed in 4.6% (27/587) of cases. In all 27 cases, LLC was performed for a "frozen" cholecystohepatic triangle. Hartmann's pouch was completely excised in all cases (27/27) and cystic duct control was achieved in 85.2% of cases (23/27). No cases of bile leak or ductal injury were reported. Rates of bile leak, post-operative complications and ERCP were lower following LLC compared to the group where LLC was not attempted (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

LLC is a safe salvage technique and should be considered in cases where the critical view of safety cannot be established. The technique achieves cystic duct control in the majority of cases and favourable outcomes in the face of a difficult cholecystectomy.

Efficacy of bailout surgery for preventing intraoperative biliary injury in acute cholecystitis

BACKGROUND

Bailout surgery (BOS; partial cholecystectomy, open conversion, and fundus-first approach) has been recommended for difficult cases to ensure safe performance of cholecystectomy. However, the efficacy of BOS for preventing intraoperative massive bleeding and bile duct injury (BDI) remains unclear, especially in the context of acute cholecystitis (AC). This study aimed to retrospectively validate the feasibility of BOS for AC.

METHODS

We enrolled 479 patients who underwent emergency cholecystectomies for AC between 2011 and 2021. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to detect the risk factors for BOS in patients with AC. Perioperative variables were compared between patients who underwent total cholecystectomy (TC) and those who underwent BOS. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the two groups.

RESULTS

Significant differences in American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, TG18 severity grading, white blood cell count, and albumin and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were found between the TC and BOS groups. Preoperative CT imaging demonstrated severe inflammation evidenced by gallbladder wall thickness, enhancement of the liver bed, and duodenal edema in the BOS group compared to the TC group. Postoperative complications were significantly higher in the BOS group than in the TC group. Further, BDI was completely prevented by BOS. Multivariate analysis identified TG18 grade ≥ II, CRP ≥ 7.7, and duodenal edema as independent risk factors for BOS. After PSM analysis, postoperative complications were not worse in patients who underwent BOS rather than TC. Among BOS procedures, laparoscopic BOS (lap-BOS) was the most efficacious in preventing intraoperative blood loss and postoperative bile leakage.

CONCLUSION

Severity grading > II, elevated CRP levels, or duodenum edema revealed by CT were determined to be risk factors impeding total cholecystectomy. BOS is a safe, feasible, and efficacious procedure for preventing BDI. Among BOS procedures, lap-BOS showed better postoperative outcomes.

Cholecystectomy for asymptomatic gallstones: Markov decision tree analysis

Gallstones are a common public health problem, especially in developed countries. There are an increasing number of patients who are diagnosed with gallstones due to increasing awareness and liberal use of imaging, with 22.6%-80% of gallstone patients being asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. Despite being asymptomatic, this group of patients are still at life-long risk of developing symptoms and complications such as acute cholangitis and acute biliary pancreatitis. Hence, while early prophylactic cholecystectomy may have some benefits in selected groups of patients, the current standard practice is to recommend cholecystectomy only after symptoms or complications occur. After reviewing the current evidence about the natural course of asymptomatic gallstones, complications of cholecystectomy, quality of life outcomes, and economic outcomes, we recommend that the option of cholecystectomy should be discussed with all asymptomatic gallstone patients. Disclosure of material information is essential for patients to make an informed choice for prophylactic cholecystectomy. It is for the patient to decide on watchful waiting or prophylactic cholecystectomy, and not for the medical community to make a blanket policy of watchful waiting for asymptomatic gallstone patients. For patients with high-risk profiles, it is clinically justifiable to advocate cholecystectomy to minimize the likelihood of morbidity due to complications.

A nationwide analysis of gallbladder surgery in England between 2000 and 2019

BACKGROUND

There are no reports on nationwide trends in subtotal cholecystectomy (STC) and cholecystostomy in England. We hypothesized that, as in the United States, a substantial increase in the utilization of these surgical procedures, over time, may be observed. We aimed to generate a reliable report on 4 of the most common gallbladder surgical procedures in England to allow cross-procedure comparisons and highlight significant changes in the management of benign gallbladder disease over time.

METHODS

We obtained data from NHS Digital and extracted population estimates from the Office of National Statistics. We examined the trends in the use of STC, cholecystostomy, cholecystolithotomy and total cholecystectomy (TC) between 2000 and 2019.

RESULTS

Of the 1,234,319 gallbladder surgeries performed, TC accounted for 96.8% (n = 1,194,786) and the other 3 surgeries for 3.2% (n = 39,533). The total number of gallbladder surgeries performed annually increased by 80.4% from 2000 to 2019. We detected increases in the counts of cholecystostomies by 723.1% (n = 290 in 2000 vs n = 2,387 in 2019) and STCs by 716.6% (n = 217 in 2000 vs n = 1,772 in 2019). Consequently, there was a decrease in the ratio of TC to STC (180:1 in 2000 vs 38:1 in 2019). A similar decrease was observed in the ratio of cholecystectomy to cholecystostomy (135:1 in 2000 vs 29:1 in 2019).

CONCLUSION

Increased utilization of STC and cholecystostomy was detected in England. These findings highlight the importance of regular monitoring of nationwide trends in gallbladder surgery and the associated clinical outcomes.

Subtotal cholecystectomy for difficult acute cholecystitis: how to finalize safely by laparoscopy-a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Aim of this study was to clarify the best laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSTC) technique for finalizing a difficult cholecystectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A review was performed (1987-2021) searching "difficulty cholecystectomy" AND/OR "subtotal cholecystectomy". The LSTC techniques considered were as follows: type A, leaving posterior wall attached to the liver and the remainder of the gallbladder stump open; type B, like type A but with the stump closed; type C, resection of both the anterior and posterior gallbladder walls and the stump closed; type D, like type C but with the stump open. Morbidity (including mortality) was analysed with Dindo-Clavien classification.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles were included. Of the 13,340 patients screened, 678 (8.2%) had cholecystectomy finalized by LSTC: 346 patients (51.0%) had type A LSTC, 134 patients (19.8%) had type B LSTC, 198 patients (29.2%) had type C LSTC, and 198 patients (0%) had type D LSTC. Bile leakage was found in 83 patients (12.2%), and recorded in 58 patients (69.9%) treated by type A. Twenty-three patients (3.4%) developed a subhepatic collection, 19 of whom (82.6%) were treated by type A. Other complications were reported in 72 patients (10.6%). The Dindo-Clavien classification was four for grade I, 27 for grade II, 126 for grade IIIa, 18 for grade IIIb, zero for grade IV and three for grade V.

CONCLUSION

In the case of LSTC, closure of the gallbladder stump represents the best method to avoid complications. Careful exploration of the gallbladder stump is mandatory, washing the abdominal cavity and leaving drainage.

Risks associated with subtotal cholecystectomy and the factors influencing them: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 studies published between 1985 and 2020

BACKGROUND

Subtotal cholecystectomy is recognized as a rescue procedure performed in grossly suboptimal circumstances that would deem a total cholecystectomy too risky to execute. An earlier systematic review based on 30 studies published between 1985 and 2013 concluded that subtotal cholecystectomy had a morbidity rate comparable to that of total cholecystectomy. This systematic review appraises 17 clinical outcomes in patients undergoing subtotal cholecystectomy.

METHODS

The study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (CRD42020172808). MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane bibliographic databases, and Google Scholar were used to identify papers published between 1985 and June 2020. Data related to the surgical setting, approach, intervention on the hepatic wall of the gallbladder, type of completion of subtotal cholecystectomy, year of study, and study design were collected. Seventeen clinical outcomes were considered. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model, and the effect size was presented as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

From 1,017 records, 85 eligible studies were identified and included. These included 3,645 patients who underwent subtotal cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic (80.1%, n = 2,918) and reconstituting (74.6%, n = 2,719) approaches represented the majority of all subtotal cholecystectomy cases. Seven (0.2%) cases of injury to the bile duct were reported. Bile leak was reported in 506 (13.9%) patients. Reconstituting subtotal cholecystectomy was associated with a lower risk for 11 clinical outcomes. Open subtotal cholecystectomy was associated with an increased rate of 30-day mortality and wound infections.

CONCLUSION

Subtotal cholecystectomy is associated with significant morbidity. Laparoscopic and reconstituting surgery may reduce the risks of some perioperative complications and long-term sequelae after subtotal cholecystectomy.

'Hot gall bladder service' by emergency general surgeons: Is this safe and feasible?

Background:

Despite NICE/AUGIS recommendations, the practice of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) has been particularly poor in the UK offered only by 11%–20% surgeons as compared to 33%–67% internationally, possibly due to financial constraints, logistical difficulties and shortage of expertise, thus, reflecting the varied provision of emergency general surgical care. To assess whether emergency general surgeons (EGS) could provide a 'Hot Gall Bladder Service' (HGS) with an acceptable outcome.

Patients and Methods:

This was a prospective HGS observational study that was protocol driven with strict inclusion/exclusion criteria and secure online data collection in a district general hospital between July 2018 and June 2019. A weekly dedicated theatre slot was allocated for this list.

Results:

Of the 143 referred for HGS, 86 (60%) underwent ELC which included 60 (70%) women. Age, ASA and body mass index was 54* (18–85) years, II* (I-III) and 27* (20–54), respectively. 86 included 46 (53%), 19 (22%), 19 (22%) and 2 (3%) patients presenting with acute calculus cholecystitis, gallstone pancreatitis, biliary colic, and acalculus cholecystitis, respectively. 85 (99%) underwent LC with a single conversion. Grade of surgical difficulty, duration of surgery and post-operative stay was 2* (1–4) 68* (30–240) min and 0* (0–13) day, respectively. Eight (9%) required senior surgical input with no intra-operative complications and 2 (2%) 30-day readmissions. One was post-operative subhepatic collection that recovered uneventfully and the second was pancreatitis, imaging was clear requiring no further intervention.

Conclusion:

In the current climate of NHS financial crunch, COVID pandemic and significant pressure on inpatient beds: Safe and cost-effective HGS can be provided by the EGS with input from upper GI/HPB surgeons (when required) with acceptable morbidity and a satisfactory outcome.

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: comparison of reconstituting and fenestrating techniques

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC) is a safe bailout procedure in situations when dissection of "critical view of safety" is not possible. After the proposed classification of subtotal cholecystectomy into "fenestrating" and "reconstituting" techniques in 2016, a comparative review of the outcomes of both methods is timely.

METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science database was conducted up to January 31, 2020 for studies that reported LSC. Studies reporting LSC only in patients with Mirizzi syndrome or xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis were excluded. Our analysis includes 39 studies with 1784 cases of LSC. We report a comparison of outcomes between reconstituting and fenestrating LSC on 1505 cases [935 reconstituting (62.1%) and 570 fenestrating (37.9%)].

RESULTS

Following LSC, the rate of open conversion is 7.7%, hemorrhage is 0.4%, bile duct injury is 0.3%, bile leak is 15.4%, retained stone is 4.6%, subhepatic or subphrenic collection is 2.9%, superficial surgical site infection is 2.0% and 30-day mortality is 0.2%. 8.8% of patients required postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), 1.1% required percutaneous intervention, and 2.2% required reoperation. Compared to reconstituting LSC, fenestrating LSC has a higher incidence of open conversion (n = 58, 10.2% vs. n = 43, 4.6%, p < 0.001), retained stones (n = 38, 6.7% vs. n = 38, 4.1%, p = 0.0253), subhepatic or subphrenic collections (n = 33, 5.8% vs. n = 13, 1.4%, p < 0.001), superficial surgical site infections (n = 18, 3.2% vs. n = 14, 1.5%, p = 0.0303), postoperative ERCP (n = 82, 14.4% vs. n = 62, 6.6%, p < 0.001), and need for reoperation (n = 20, 3.5% vs. n = 12, 1.3%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although reconstituting LSC has better outcomes, both techniques are complementary. Intraoperative findings and surgical expertise impact the choice.

Re-interventions and re-admissions in a 13-year series following use of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy

Background:

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSTC) without cystic duct ligation is an alternative to conversion to open surgery in a difficult cholecystectomy, thus avoiding a potentially hazardous dissection in Calot's triangle. The long-term outcomes of this procedure are not well reported. The aim of this study is to assess the rates of re-presentation, re-admissions, endoscopic interventions and completion cholecystectomy in patients who have undergone LSTC.

Methods:

Details of all patients undergoing cholecystectomy over a 13-year period (2003–2015) were entered on a prospective database. Further information on subsequent hospital attendances, biliary imaging, endoscopic interventions and re-operations following the index LSTC was collected retrospectively from hospital database.

Results:

Overall, 2313 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eighty-five patients (3.7%) underwent LSTC and the rest had standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A controlled bile leak was observed in 16 (19%) patients post-operatively, of which 3 resolved spontaneously. The remaining 13 were managed with an early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and biliary stent. Twenty-seven patients (32%), who underwent LSTC, were re-investigated for the upper abdominal symptoms. The time range for re-investigation was 21 days–124 months. Eight patients underwent ERCP post-discharge, for suspected bile duct stones on radiological imaging. Two patients required open completion cholecystectomy for symptomatic stones in the gallbladder remnant.

Conclusion:

LSTC is a feasible and safe alternative to open surgery with acceptable long-term consequences and re-interventions.

Subtotal cholecystectomy: early and long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

In difficult gallbladders, partial or subtotal cholecystectomy (SC) has been described as a reasonable procedure with safe outcomes. Our aim was to look at our data on SC with respect to safety, morbidity and long-term outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed for 3560 patients undergoing cholecystectomy from January 2010 to June 2016. For patients who underwent SC, demographics, intra-operative and follow-up details were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 168 SC patients were included. 102 (60.7%) were male while 66 (39.3%) were female. The median age was 63 years (31-87). These patients were on follow-up for a median of 29 months (1.7-80). 153 were attempted laparoscopically and there were 25 (16.3%) patients which had open conversion. The rest of the 15 patients had open SC. Mean operative time 150 min (70-315) and average blood loss was 170 ml (50-1500). Median length of stay for these patients was 4 days (1-68). There were no common bile duct (CBD) injuries. We had 12 (7.1%) post-operative collections, 4 (2.4%) wound infections, 1 (0.6%) bile leak and 7 (4.2%) retained stones. Post-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed on 4 (2.4%) patients with successful retrieval of CBD stones. One patient has spontaneous passage of CBD stone. The rest of the two patients with very small retained stones in remnant gallbladder were successfully managed conservatively. There was no 30-day or operation-related mortality. No patient required a second operation.

CONCLUSIONS

SC is safe and feasible when encountering a difficult gallbladder.

Uncommon Presentation of Severe Empyema of the Gallbladder: Case Report and Literature Review

Patient: Male, 60-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Severe empyema of the gallbladder

Symptoms: Abdominal and/or epigastric pain • fever

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Surgery

The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients with mild acute gallstone pancreatitis (MAGP) is controversial. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) in patients with MAGP.

METHODS

A strict search was conducted of the electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE Embase, the ISI Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for all relevant English literature and RevMan5.3 software for statistical analysis was used.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies comprising 2639 patients were included. There was no significant difference in intraoperative complications [risk ratio (RR) = 1.46; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.88-2.41; P = .14)], postoperative complications (RR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.58-1.14; P = .23), rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy (RR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.75-1.33; P = .99), operative time (MD = 1.60; 95% CI = -1.36-4.56; P = .29), and rate of readmission (RR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.19-2.10; P = .45) between the ELC and DLC groups. However, the ELC group was significantly correlated with lower length of hospital stay (MD = -2.01; 95% CI = -3.15 to -0.87; P = .0006), fewer gallstone-related events rates (RR = 0.17; 95% CI = 0.07-0.44; P = .0003), and lower endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) usage (RR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.71-0.97; P = .02) compared with the DLC group.

CONCLUSION

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and effective for patients with MAGP, but the indications and contraindications must be strictly controlled.

Closure of the cystic duct orifice in laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC) has been recognized as an alternative to conversion to laparotomy for severe cholecystitis. However, it may be associated with an increased risk of recurrent stones in the gallbladder remnant. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the complete removal of the gallbladder cavity in LSC for severe cholecystitis using the cystic duct orifice suturing (CDOS) technique.

METHODS

In a consecutive series of 412 laparoscopic cholecystectomies that were performed from January 2015 to June 2017, 12 patients who underwent LSC with CDOS were enrolled in this retrospective study. In this procedure, Hartmann's pouch was carefully identified, and the infundibulum-cystic duct junction was transected while the posterior wall adherent to Calot's triangle was left behind. The clinical records, including the operative records and outcomes, were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median operating time and blood loss were 158 min and 20 mL, respectively. In all cases, LSC with CDOS was completed without conversion to open surgery. No injuries to the bile duct or vessels were experienced. The median postoperative hospital stay was 6 days. Postoperative complications occurred in two patients (bile leakage, n = 1: common bile duct stones, n = 1) and were successfully treated by endoscopic management. A gallbladder remnant was not delineated by postoperative imaging in any of the cases.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that LSC with CDOS is a promising approach that can avoid dissection of Calot's triangle and achieve the complete removal of the gallbladder cavity in patients with severe cholecystitis.

Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos)

In some cases, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) may be difficult to perform in patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) with severe inflammation and fibrosis. The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) expand the indications for LC under difficult conditions for each level of severity of AC. As a result of expanding the indications for LC to treat AC, it is absolutely necessary to avoid any increase in bile duct injury (BDI), particularly vasculo-biliary injury (VBI), which is known to occur at a certain rate in LC. Since the Tokyo Guidelines 2013 (TG13), an attempt has been made to assess intraoperative findings as objective indicators of surgical difficulty; based on expert consensus on these difficulty indicators, bail-out procedures (including conversion to open cholecystectomy) have been indicated for cases in which LC for AC is difficult to perform. A bail-out procedure should be chosen if, when the Calot's triangle is appropriately retracted and used as a landmark, a critical view of safety (CVS) cannot be achieved because of the presence of nondissectable scarring or severe fibrosis. We propose standardized safe steps for LC to treat AC. To achieve a CVS, it is vital to dissect at a location above (on the ventral side of) the imaginary line connecting the base of the left medial section (Segment 4) and the roof of Rouvière's sulcus and to fulfill the three criteria of CVS before dividing any structures. Achieving a CVS prevents the misidentification of the cystic duct and the common bile duct, which are most commonly confused. Free full articles and mobile app of TG18 are available at: http://www.jshbps.jp/modules/en/index.php?content_id=47. Related clinical questions and references are also included.

The outcome of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in difficult cases - A case series

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC) is a widely used technique for managing cholelithiasis with severe cholecystitis. The increasing popularity its utilization is due to the good safety profile and acceptable results. This case series evaluates the short- and long-term results of Indonesian patients who underwent LSC with an objective to determine whether the procedure can be a standard approach for difficult cholecystectomy in our institution.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

Thirty-four Indonesian patients (26 men, 8 women) with the mean age of 54.6 years (median 54 years, range 30-84 years) who underwent LSC were retrospectively analyzed. Nineteen patients are suffering from type II diabetes mellitus and fourteen patients with suspected choledocoholithiasis underwent ERCP prior to LSC. The major postoperative diagnosis was acute cholecystitis (16 patients), followed by gallbladder empyema (10 patients), chronic cholecystitis (5 patients), history of cholangitis (1 patient), Mirizzi's syndrome (1 patient) and stone retention post-ERCP (1 patient).

DISCUSSION

The mean operating time was 158minutes (median 150minutes, range 60-240minutes), mean length of hospital stay of 4.6days (median 3days, range 2-33days) and drain usage for 3.6days (median 3.0days, range 1-19days). Postoperatively there was one case of bilioenteric fistula, one case of stone retention and two cases of prolonged upper gastrointestinal symptoms. There is no case of biliary leakage, peritonitis or wound infection.

CONCLUSION

The outcome of LSC in this case series is comparable with other publications showing a general favorability of LSC. Further studies are needed to elucidate the clinical benefits of several LSC technical points such as stump closure, posterior wall diathermy and drain usage. Based on this preliminary finding, LSC can be applied as a standard procedure for difficult cases in our institution.

IRCAD recommendation on safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy

An expert recommendation conference was conducted to identify factors associated with adverse events during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with the goal of deriving expert recommendations for the reduction of biliary and vascular injury. Nineteen hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeons from high-volume surgery centers in six countries comprised the Research Institute Against Cancer of the Digestive System (IRCAD) Recommendations Group. Systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase was conducted. Using nominal group technique, structured group meetings were held to identify key items for safer LC. Consensus was achieved when 80% of respondents ranked an item as 1 or 2 (Likert scale 1-4). Seventy-one IRCAD HPB course participants assessed the expert recommendations which were compared to responses of 37 general surgery course participants. The IRCAD recommendations were structured in seven statements. The key topics included exposure of the operative field, appropriate use of energy device and establishment of the critical view of safety (CVS), systematic preoperative imaging, cholangiogram and alternative techniques, role of partial and dome-down (fundus-first) cholecystectomy. Highest consensus was achieved on the importance of the CVS as well as dome-down technique and partial cholecystectomy as alternative techniques. The put forward IRCAD recommendations may help to promote safe surgical practice of LC and initiate specific training to avoid adverse events.

Subtotal cholecystectomy for the hostile gallbladder: failure to control the cystic duct results in significant morbidity

BACKGROUND

Outcomes following the inability to control the cystic duct due to a hostile triangle of Calot during cholecystectomy remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of subtotal cholecystectomy, with attention to the necessity for secondary interventions.

METHODS

Sixteen thousand five hundred ninety six cholecystectomies from January 2002 to August 2014 were reviewed, identifying patients managed with subtotal cholecystectomy, defined as the inability to isolate/transect the cystic duct. After propensity matching, we investigated surgical indications, perioperative outcomes, and the necessity for secondary ERCP, percutaneous drainage, and completion cholecystectomy.

RESULTS

65 (0.39%) patients underwent subtotal cholecystectomy; 54 (83.1%) began laparoscopically, of which 30 (55.6%) required conversion to laparotomy. Subtotal cholecystectomy, performed more frequently for acute cholecystitis (70.8% vs 34.6%), was associated with extended hospitalizations (4 d vs 2 d) and frequent surgical site infections (20% vs 4.6%). 25 (38.5%) subtotal cholecystectomy patients required ≥1 secondary intervention, and compared to standard cholecystectomy, underwent higher rates postoperative ERCP (30.8% vs 5.4%), percutaneous drainage (9.2% vs 1.5%), and completion cholecystectomy (6.2% vs 0%) [all P < 0.05].

DISCUSSION

Subtotal cholecystectomy fails to control the cystic duct, resulting in significant morbidity. Most do not require completion cholecystectomy; however, patients demand close observation and, frequently, secondary interventions.

Are They Too Old for Surgery? Safety of Cholecystectomy in Superelderly Patients (≥ Age 90)

CONTEXT

Cholecystectomy is the most common general surgery procedure in patients older than age 65 years. By 2050, it is estimated that 2.0% of the population will be older than age 90 years.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the mortality of cholecystectomy in superelderly patients (≥ age 90 years).

DESIGN

Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, a retrospective analysis was performed of superelderly patients who underwent laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy between 2005 and 2012.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Thirty-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1007 cholecystectomies were performed in superelderly patients between 2005 and 2012. Of these surgical procedures, 807 (80%) were nonemergent and 200 (20%) were performed emergently. Two hundred sixteen procedures (21.4%) were open and 791 (78.6%) were laparoscopic. Mortality did not decrease significantly during the study period. The overall mortality was 5.5%, significantly less for the laparoscopic group (3.7% vs 12%, p < 0.001) and for the nonemergent group (4.5% vs 9.5%, p < 0.005). The median length of stay for open cholecystectomy was 9 days compared with 5 days for laparoscopic (p < 0.001); for nonemergent cholecystectomy it was 5 days compared with 7 days for emergent cholecystectomy (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The mortality after cholecystectomy in superelderly patients did not change significantly during the study period. The mortality and morbidity for laparoscopic and elective procedures were significantly lower than for open procedures and for emergent procedures, respectively.