Erector spinae plane block in abdominal surgery: Case series

The Analgesic Impact of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction: The analysis of postoperative pain has gained prominence as an important outcome following inguinal hernia repair (IHR), and various strategies have been employed. However, the use of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in IHR is debated. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates their efficacy. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing the impact of ESPB on pain outcomes following IHR. Outcomes included pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) rates. Statistical analyses were performed using R software and trial sequential analysis. Results: We included three RCTs comprising 145 patients, of which 66 (45.5%) were submitted to ESPB. Between the included studies, two analyzed minimally invasive IHR, while one analyzed the open Lichtenstein technique. We found no differences in VAS pain scores at 2 hours (MD: -0.56; 95% CI: [-3.53; 2.42]; P = .71) and at 6 hours (MD: -1.13; 95% CI: [-2.50; 0.23]; P = .1) postoperatively. Also, no clinically or statistically significant differences were found in the VAS score for ESPB at 12 hours (MD: -0.96; 95% CI: [-1.94; -.02]; P = .051) and 24 hours postoperatively (MD: -0.19; 95% CI: [-0.53; .15]; P = .28). No statistically significant differences were found in PONV rates between the groups (7.6% versus 20.3%; RR 0.38; 95% CI: [0.14; 1.0]; P = .05). Conclusion: This meta-analysis found no differences in postoperative pain scores or PONV between the ESPB and control groups. Further studies are necessary to better understand the role of ESPB in inguinal hernia repair.

Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) is a common surgical procedure. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and intrathecal morphine (ITM) provide adequate postoperative (PO) analgesia. However, ITM side effects may limit its use. Researchers investigated the efficacy of bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB on PO pain and analgesic consumption compared to ITM in the first 24 h following TAH under general anesthesia.

METHODS

120 patients premedicated with 3 mg intravenous granisetron were randomized into three equal groups: bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB, ITM or control group. The primary outcome of this study was the time to first request for a rescue analgesic (tramadol).

RESULTS

Compared to the control group, the ESPB and ITM groups showed higher time to first request for a rescue analgesic and lower total tramadol consumption 24 h following surgery (P < 0.001) with significant differences between the ESPB and ITM groups (P < 0.001). The ITM group showed lower pain scores and lower readings of both serum glucose and cortisol levels compared to the other two groups 24 h after surgery (P < 0.001). The ITM group also had higher incidences of nausea and pruritus 24 h after surgery (P < 0.001). The use of a single intrathecal injection of 0.3 mg morphine did not show any respiratory depression.

CONCLUSION

0.3 mg intrathecal morphine was superior to erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain relief, 24 h after surgery, regarding attenuated stress response, lower pain scores at rest and on coughing and lower tramadol consumption. IRB: IRB 00006379//31-1-2022.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05218733.

Efficacy of ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block compared to wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain remains a significant problem in patients undergoing donor nephrectomy despite reduced tissue trauma following laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN). Inadequately treated pain leads to physiological and psychological consequences, including chronic neuropathic pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized controlled double-blinded trial was conducted in sixty-nine (n = 69) participants who underwent LLDN under general anesthesia. Participants were randomized into Group B (n = 34) and Group C (n = 35). Group B received ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with bupivacaine 0.125% 20 ml on the surgical side and 10 ml on the contralateral side before extubation, while Group C received wound infiltration with bupivacaine 0.125% 15 ml. The primary objective of the study was to compare cumulative 24-hour morphine consumption postoperatively. The secondary objectives were time to first rescue analgesia, visual numeric rating scale (VNRS) pain scores at rest and during movement, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and complications associated with ESPB.

RESULTS

Participants in Group B required significantly less median (IQR) 24-hour morphine compared to Group C [6 (6-9) mg vs. 15 (12-15) mg; median difference 9; 95% CI in median difference 6-12; p < 0.001), longer median (IQR) time to first rescue analgesia [6 (6-8) hours vs. 1 (1-2) hours; p < 0.001], and lower VNRS at rest and during movement at baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided ESPB provided effective pain relief compared to wound infiltration with local anaesthetic in patients who underwent LLDN.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

INT/IEC/2021/SPL-514; CTRI/2021/07/045909.

Erector Spinae Plane Block as an Anesthetic Technique for Open Gastrostomy: A Case Report

The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a relatively new technique that has been gaining attention for its versatility in providing thoracoabdominal postoperative analgesia. This case report describes the successful use of a bilateral ESPB with sedation as an anesthetic technique in a 50-year-old male diagnosed with esophageal cancer with a suspected bronchoesophageal fistula, who required an open gastrostomy. Given the patient's condition and the potential high risk of respiratory complications associated with general anesthesia, ESPB was chosen for its potential ability to offer effective surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with minimal risks. A total of 12 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% was administered on each side at T9 level, achieving an effective sensory block from T7 to T10. Throughout the procedure, the patient maintained spontaneous ventilation and experienced no intraoperative complications. This report highlights the potential role of ESPB in high-risk patients. Further research is required to validate its efficacy and safety as an anesthetic technique for minor surgical procedures.

Comparisons in analgesic effects between ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and surgical intercostal nerve block after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of anesthesiologist-administrated erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and surgeon-administrated intercostal nerve block (ICNB) following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled, double-blinded study.

SETTING

Operating room, postoperative recovery room and ward in two centers.

PATIENTS

One hundred patients, ASA I-III and scheduled for elective VATS.

INTERVENTIONS

The anesthesiologist-administrated ESPB under ultrasound guidance or surgeon-administrated ICNB under video-assisted thoracoscopy was randomly provided during VATS. Regular oral non-opioid analgesic combined with intravenous rescue morphine were prescribed for multimodal analgesia after surgery.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcomes were the pain score and morphine consumption during 48 h after surgery. Postoperative pain intensity were assessed using the 10-cm visual analogue scale at 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery. Morphine consumption at these time points was compared between the two study groups. Furthermore, oral weak opioid rescue analgesic was also provided at 24 h after surgery. Postoperative quality of recovery at 24 h was also assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, along with duration of chest tube drainage and hospital stay were compared as secondary outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Patients in the two study groups had comparable baseline characteristics, and surgical types were also similar. Postoperative VAS changes at 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery were also comparable between the two study groups. Both groups had low median scores (<4.0) at all time points (all p > 0.05). Patients in the ESPB group required statistically non-significant higher 48-h morphine consumption [3 (0-6) vs. 0 (0-6) mg in the ESPB group and ICNB group respectively; p = 0.135] and lower numbers of oral rescue analgesic (0.4 ± 1.2 vs. 1.0 ± 1.8 in the ESPB group and ICNB group respectively; p = 0.059). Additionally, patients in the two study groups had similar QoR15 scores and lengths of hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Both anesthesiologist-administered ultrasound-guided ESPB and surgeon-administered VATS ICNB were effective analgesic techniques for patients undergoing VATS for tumor resection.

Comparison of the postoperative effects of the erector spinae plane block and local infiltration analgesia in patients operated with lumbotomy surgery incision: Randomized clinical study

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to observe the effects of local infiltration analgesia (LIA) or erector spinae plane block (ESPB) methods, which we applied preemptively in patients who were scheduled for surgery with a lumbotomy surgical incision and on intraoperative remifentanil consumption, and to compare the postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS), morphine demand, consumption, and pain degrees.

METHODS

Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists I to III patients aged 18 to 75 years who were due to be operated on with a lumbotomy surgical incision were included in the study. The present study was conducted via prospective, randomized controlled, double-blind trials. After the induction of standard anesthesia, LIA was applied to 30 patients and ESPB was applied to 30 patients preemptively. The dose of remifentanil consumed in the intraoperative period was measured, and the hemodynamic parameters were measured every 5 minutes. Morphine bolus treatment with the postoperative patient-controlled analgesia and rescue analgesia with paracetamol were planned for the patients. Postoperative morphine and additional analgesia consumption, NRS, hemodynamic parameters, and complications were recorded for 48 hours.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the groups in terms of demographic and hemodynamic data. The mean consumption of remifentanil was measured as 455 ± 165.23 µg in the intraoperative ESPB group and 296.67 ± 110.59 µg in the LIA group, and a statistical difference was observed (P = .001). In the postoperative follow-ups, the ESPB group drug consumption and NRS score averages were significantly lower at all times (P = .01; patient-controlled analgesia-morphine, 41.93 ± 14.47 mg vs 57.23 ± 15.5 mg and additional analgesic-paracetamol: 2.1 ± 1.06 vs 4.27 ± 1.14 g). The mean duration of additional analgesic intake of the groups was 10.6 ± 8.1 in the LIA group, while it was 19.33 ± 8.87 in the ESPB group, a significant difference. The patient satisfaction questionnaire was also significantly in favor of ESPB (P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, it has been shown that the intraoperative LIA method is more effective in terms of remifentanil consumption and in controlling pain in operations performed with a flank incision, but the ESPB method provides longer and more effective pain control in postoperative follow-ups.

Analgesia efficacy of erector spinae plane block in laparoscopic abdominal surgeries: a systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multimodal analgesia is now widely practised to minimise postoperative opioid consumption while optimising pain control. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgeries. This will be determined by perioperative opioid consumption, subjective pain scores, and incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

METHODS

The authors systemically searched electronic databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published up to February 2023 comparing ESPB with other adjuvant analgesic techniques in laparoscopic abdominal surgeries. Nine randomised controlled trials encompassing 666 subjects were included in our study.

RESULTS

ESPB was shown to reduce postoperative opioid consumption [mean difference (MD) of -5.95 mg (95% CI: -8.86 to -3.04; P <0.0001); I2 =89%], intraoperative opioid consumption MD of -102.4 mcg (95% CI: -145.58 to -59.21; P <0.00001); I2 =39%, and incidence of nausea [RR 0.38 (95% CI: 0.25-0.60; P <0.0001); I2 =0%] and vomiting [RR 0.32 (95% CI: 0.17-0.63; P =0.0009); I2 =0%] in laparoscopic abdominal surgeries. Subgroup analysis on laparoscopic colorectal surgeries further showed reduction in postoperative pain scores MD of -0.68 (95% CI: -0.94 to -0.41); P <0.00001; I2 =0%].

CONCLUSIONS

This study concludes that ESPB is a valuable technique with proven efficacy to potentially promote faster postoperative recovery through optimising pain control while minimising opioid requirements.

Opioid-sparing effect of erector spinae plane block and intravenous dexmedetomidine for obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the impact of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine in reduction of perioperative opioid consumption following bariatric surgery and their impact on post-operative recovery, analgesia, and pulmonary functions.

DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Tanta University Hospitals, Tanta, Gharboa, Egypt.

PATIENTS

Forty obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), aged 20-55 years, and eligible for bariatric surgery were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients randomized into group I (received general anesthesia [GA] with opioid, sham ESPB, and IV normal saline) or group II (received GA [without opioid], ESPB [at T7 level] using 20 mL bupivacaine 0.25 percent and bolus IV dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg and then 0.25 µg/kg/h).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Fentanyl consumption (primary outcome), sevoflurane consumption, recovery time, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and pulmonary functions (secondary outcomes) were recorded.

RESULTS

Perioperative fentanyl (intraoperative, post-operative, and total) consumption and sevoflurane consumption were substantially lower in group II compared to group I (p = 0.010, <0.001, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively). Moreover, recovery time was shorter in group II (p < 0.001). At 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours after surgery, group I patients had VAS values considerably higher. Relative to preoperative values, pulmonary function did not significantly alter after surgery. Oxygen desaturation was significantly lower in group II (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The ESPB with IV dexmedetomidine is advantageous for OSAS patients having bariatric surgery as it provides anesthesia and opioid-sparing effect with short recovery, adequate analgesia, and nonsignificant complications. Yet, it had no effect on post-operative pulmonary function.

Comparison of midpoint transverse process to pleura (MTP) block and erector spinae plane block (ESP) for postoperative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy patients: A double-blinded, randomized control trial

Background and Aims

Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is associated with moderate severity of postoperative pain. Besides intravenous (IV) analgesics, various nerve blocks are being described for pain relief of MRM patients. We compared erector spinae plane (ESP) block with midpoint transverse process to pleura (MTP) block in these patients for postoperative analgesia.

Material and Methods

After receiving ethical committee approval from the institutional ethics committee (AIIMS, Jodhpur) and written informed consent from study participants, 66 patients who were assigned American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II, aged 18-75 years, and were scheduled to undergo MRM were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups. Unilateral block was given before surgery at T3 or T4 level and with 15 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine in both the groups. Infusion of 0.5% ropivacaine (Neon laboratories limited, Mumbai, India) and 0.2% ropivacaine at a rate of 5 ml/h was maintained intraoperatively and postoperatively, respectively. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for the next 24 hours. The total number of patients needing rescue analgesia, the total amount of rescue analgesics consumed in the next 24 hours, and patient satisfaction score were also compared between groups.

Results

Demographics and baseline vitals were comparable in the groups. On comparing VAS scores in both the groups during rest and movement at different time intervals, there was no difference in pain scores during the initial two hours. From the third hour, there was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) in pain VAS scores in both groups. The ESP group had lower VAS scores compared to the MTP group when followed for the next 24 hours. There was a statistically significant difference in patient satisfaction.

Conclusion

ESP block is more efficacious when compared to MTP block for postoperative analgesia in MRM patients.

Successful Use of Ultrasound Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Without General Anesthesia for Open Appendectomy in a Patient with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction- A Case Report and Literature Review

Background

Patients diagnosed with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) are at high risk of perioperative cardiovascular complications. While it is important to focus on optimizing their cardiac function, it is also crucial to address and optimize any other modifiable risk factors that could potentially impact postoperative outcome. This also includes careful consideration of anesthetic techniques to suit the patient and facilitate the surgery. However, there is a scarcity of evidence regarding the safety of specific anesthetic approaches for heart failure patients.

Case Presentation

We describe the case of an adult patient in mid-50s, with a history of ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy with reduced Ejection Fraction (about 25%) who presented with acute gangrenous appendicitis and was scheduled for an open appendectomy. It was deemed to be a high-risk patient for general and spinal anesthesia. With the guidance of a multidisciplinary team, surgery was successfully performed using a quadratus lumborum block with standard monitoring. The patient was comfortable and hemodynamically stable throughout the procedure. The postoperative course was uneventful.

Conclusion

Quadratus Lumborum Block for open appendectomy can be a beneficial alternative anesthesia technique in high-risk patients that significantly lowers perioperative cardiovascular risk, maintains hemodynamics, enhances satisfaction, and shortens hospital stay.

Erector spinae plane block for radiofrequency ablation of hepatic focal lesions: Randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the opioid sparing and pain relief effect of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatic focal lesions under conscious sedation.

DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Tanta University Hospitals.

PATIENTS

Fifty patients aged 30-60 years old and eligible for RFA of hepatic focal lesions were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients randomized to receive either local anesthetic infiltration (group I) or ESPB (group II). Both groups received sedation by propofol infusion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome was total fentanyl consumption. Secondary outcomes were nonverbal pain score (NVPS), time to first analgesic request post-procedure, radiologist's satisfaction, and complications.

RESULTS

In group I, NVPS was significantly increased at 10, 15, 25, and 30 minutes during RFA compared to group II (p = 0.008, <0.001, 0.018, and 0.001, respectively) with no significant differences on arrival to post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and after 1 hour. Total fentanyl consumption during the procedure was significantly increased in group I compared to group II (160.9 ± 38.2 and 76 ± 21 µg, respectively; p < 0.001) with prolonged time to first analgesia request post-procedure in group II compared to group I (392.7 ± 38.8 and 101.1 ± 13.6 minutes, respectively; p < 0.001). The level of radiologist's satisfaction was significantly increased in the group II (p = 0.010). Three patients in group I and one patient in group II needed general anesthesia. Lower incidence of complications in group II occurred with statistical insignificance.

CONCLUSIONS

The ESPB provided adequate analgesia and reduced opioids consumption during the hepatic RFA, with high radiologist's satisfaction.

Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Analgesia in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Quality Improvement Project

Introduction Pain management in patients with chronic kidney disease is challenging. Due to impaired kidney function, analgesic options are limited. Postoperative analgesia in transplant recipients is further complicated by their vulnerability to infections, titrated fluid management and optimal haemodynamics to maintain graft function. Erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks have been used successfully in a variety of surgeries. This study is a quality improvement project aiming to assess the efficacy of continuous erector spinae plane catheter analgesia in the postoperative management of kidney transplant recipients. Methods We conducted an initial audit over a period of three months. All patients who underwent kidney transplantation under general anaesthesia with erector spinae plane catheters were included. Erector spinae plane catheters were secured prior to induction, and continuous local anaesthetic infusion was maintained postoperatively. Pain scores using the numerical rating scale (NRS) were recorded at intervals in the first 24 hours postoperatively, and supplementary analgesics given were noted. Following satisfactory results from the initial audit, we implemented erector spinae plane catheters as part of multimodal analgesia in transplant patients in our centre. We re-audited all transplants done over the next year to reassess the quality of postoperative analgesia. Results Five patients were audited during the initial audit. The average NRS score ranged from 0 at rest to a maximum of 5 during mobilisation. All patients were given only paracetamol to supplement analgesia, and none required opioids. During the re-audit, data was collected on postoperative pain management in 13 subsequent transplants conducted over the next year. The NRS scores ranged from 0 at rest to 6 on mobilisation. Two patients required boluses of fentanyl 25 mcg via the catheter, and the rest reported satisfactory analgesia with paracetamol as needed. Conclusion This quality improvement project changed our centre's practice in managing postoperative pain in kidney transplantations. We switched from securing epidural catheters to erector spinae plane catheters due to better safety profile, minimal use of opioids and lesser adverse effects. We shall continue to re-audit our practices for the best outcomes.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block in endovideosurgical hernioplasty inguinal hernias

The objective was to evaluate  the effectiveness of the erector  spinae plane block (ESP-block) as a component of perioperative analgesia in endovideosurgical  hernioplasty of inguinal hernias.

Materials and methods. The study included 70 patients who underwent endovideosurgical plastic surgery of inguinal hernias. All patients randomly divided into the main (n=32) and control  (n=38) groups, were given general combined anesthesia. In the main group, it was supplemented with the ESP-block, which was performed with ropivacaine at the L1 level. Intraoperatively, fentanyl was used for analgesia. The indication for its introduction was an increase in the Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) of more than 50. In the early postoperative period, ketoprofen and tramadol were used for analgesia, which were administered with the development of moderate  and high intensity of the pain. The effectiveness of the ESP-block was evaluated by comparing the total doses of analgesic drugs that were required for analgesia during surgery and in the early postoperative period in patients of both groups.

Results. In the main group, the total doses of fentanyl and ketoprofen were statistically significantly lower compared to the control group (p<0.01). After surgery, tramadol was used only in patients of the control  group. In some patients of the main group who required analgesia in the early postoperative  period (n=15), the pain syndrome  developed  only 12 hours after the end of the surgery. Their intraoperative need for fentanyl  did not differ from other patients of the main group (p>0.05).

Conclusion. In endovideosurgical hernioplasty of inguinal hernias, the use of the ESP-block as part of multimodal analgesia contributes to achieving a good level of analgesia both intra- and in the early postoperative period.

Comparative efficacy of quadratus lumborum type-II and erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Quadratus lumborum and erector spinae plane blocks have been used to provide analgesia in patients undergoing thoracic or abdominal surgeries. Our study compared the analgesic efficacy of the quadratus lumborum type-II block (QLB-II) and the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in parturients who underwent caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients with comparable demographic profiles were randomised into two groups, QLB-II (n = 26) and ESPB (n = 26). After the surgery, patients received either ultrasound-guided QLB-II or ESPB using 0.25% bupivacaine 0.3 mL/kg. Comparison of analgesic efficacy was in terms of fentanyl consumption (primary outcome), pain scores, incidence of complications in the 24-h postoperative period, and quality of recovery (QoR-15) on postoperative days one and two, and day of discharge.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in cumulative number of fentanyl doses (W = 349.000, P = 0.840), numerical rating score at rest (P = 0.648) or with movement (P = 0.520), QoR-15 scores on postoperative day one (P = 0.549), day two (P = 0.927) or day of discharge (P = 0.676).

CONCLUSION

We concluded that patients who underwent QLB-II or ESPB reported similar analgesic efficacy, complications, and quality of recovery in the postoperative period.

Regional and neuraxial anaesthesia techniques for spinal surgery: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Whilst general anaesthesia is commonly used to undertake spine surgery, the use of neuraxial and peripheral regional anaesthesia techniques for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia is an evolving practice. Variations in practice have meant that it is difficult to know which modalities achieve optimal outcomes for patients undergoing spinal surgery. Our objective was to identify available evidence on the use of regional and neuraxial anaesthesia techniques for adult patients undergoing spinal surgery.

METHODS

This study was conducted using a framework for scoping reviews. This included a search of six databases searching for articles published since January 1980. We included studies that involved adult patients undergoing spinal surgery with regional or neuraxial techniques used as the primary anaesthesia method or as part of an analgesic strategy.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight articles were selected for final review. All original papers were included, including case reports, case series, clinical trials, or conference publications. We found that general anaesthesia remains the most common anaesthesia technique for this patient cohort. However, regional anaesthesia, especially non-neuraxial techniques such as fascial plane blocks, is an emerging practice and may have a role in terms of improving postoperative pain relief, quality of recovery, and patient satisfaction. In comparison with neuraxial techniques, the popularity of fascial plane blocks for spinal surgery has significantly increased since 2017.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional and neuraxial anaesthesia techniques have been used both to provide analgesia and anaesthesia for patients undergoing spinal surgery. Outcome metrics for the success of these techniques vary widely and more frequently use physiological outcome metrics more than patient-centred ones.

Erector Spinae Plane Block is Equivalent to Tumescent Local Anesthesia for Perioperative Pain Control with Abdominal Harvest for Fat Grafting

There is increasing evidence that lidocaine is toxic to adipocytes and their precursors, which can contribute to the variability in fat graft resorption. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a new technique to provide analgesia of the trunk and would avoid lidocaine at the fat graft donor site. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ESP block versus tumescent local anesthesia (TLA).

Methods

A retrospective review was performed for all patients who underwent autologous fat grafting from the abdomen at the University of New Mexico Hospital between February 2016 and March 2019. These patients received either ESP block or TLA during abdominal fat harvest. The primary endpoints were intraoperative, postoperative, and total morphine equivalents.

Results

There was no difference in the mean intraoperative, postoperative, and total morphine equivalents administered between the ESP and TLA groups.

Conclusions

ESP block is equivalent to TLA for analgesia when using an abdominal donor site for fat harvest. ESP block should be considered in fat-grafting cases to avoid the potential toxicity of lidocaine to the viability of adipocytes and preadipocytes.

NEW CONCEPT OF FUSION TECHNICS IN REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

The aim of this review article is to introduce a newer approach to multimodal anesthesia. In addition to the usual combination of epidural catheter and general anesthesia as standard techniques in surgical procedures accompanied by intense postoperative pain, we want to encourage reflection on the application of various regional techniques in equally complex surgical conditions. By simply modifying the standard neuraxial technique with a higher thoracic approach, excellent abdominal surgery can be performed to awake the patient. However, placement of an epidural catheter is not always possible due to technical difficulties or patient-related conditions that contraindicate its insertion. Trunk-level fascia blocks (PVB, ESPB, RLB) are simple, safe alternative to an epidural catheter because the transverse process, which is the target of ultrasound, is easily visualized and the injection site is away from neuroaxis, pleura, and large vascular structures. In addition, extensive craniocaudal diffusion of anesthetics allows wide coverage with a single injection. It has been confirmed that PVB, ESPB, RLB blocks act on visceral and somatic pain. Therefore, their ultrasound-guided use in laparoscopic and other abdominal surgeries may be useful. With a well-designed fusion of regional techniques in operations of the upper and lower abdomen, it is possible to achieve hemodynamically and respiratory stable anesthesia in an awake patient with reduced postoperative pain.

A comparison of paravertebral block, erector spinae plane block and the combination of erector spinae plane block and paravertebral block for post-operative analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This study was to determine the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and paravertebral block (PVB) as well as the combination of PVB and ESPB (P + E) after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive ESPB, PVB or PVB combined with ESPB with 0.5% ropivacaine (20 ml). The primary outcomes were cumulative hydromorphone consumption and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores at rest and while coughing at 0 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were effective PCA usage count and rescue analgesia requirement at the same time points.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) hydromorphone consumption, including converted oxycodone, was significantly different at 48 h postoperatively among the three groups (ESPB, 10.24 [9.53-11.71] mg; PVB, 9.94 [9.19-10.75] mg; P + E, 9.44 [8.96-9.97] mg; P = 0.011). Hydromorphone consumption in P + E group was lower compared with that in ESPB group at 12 h, 24 h and 48 h (P < 0.001, P = 0.004 and P = 0.003, respectively). VAS scores at rest were significantly higher for ESPB group compared to P + E group at 0 h postoperatively (P = 0.009). VAS scores while coughing were significantly higher for ESPB group compared to P + E group at 0 h and 12 h postoperatively (P = 0.015 and P < 0.001) and to the PVB group at 12 h postoperatively (P = 0.002). The effective PCA usage count in P + E group was lower than in ESPB group in 0-12 h (P < 0.001). More patients needed rescue analgesia in ESPB group compared to those in P + E group in 0-12 h, 0-24 h and 0-48 h (P = 0.022, 0.035 and 0.035, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided PVB combined with ESPB provided superior analgesia to ESPB for VATS. The combination of PVB and ESPB had a similar analgesic effect compared with PVB alone.

Comparison of Continuous Thoracic Epidural With Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Adult Living Donor Hepatectomy

Background: Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is commonly used for pain management in donor hepatectomy. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a newer ultrasound-guided block described for the management of thoracic and abdominal pain. There is limited literature available comparing the two techniques. The objective of this study was to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of continuous ESPB to continuous TEA in donor hepatectomy.

Methodology: The randomized controlled trial (RCT) was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04151511). A total of 82 patients undergoing donor hepatectomy between January 2020 and December 2020 were recruited, of whom 41 received TEA and 41 received ESPB. Randomization was done by the sealed opaque envelope method.

Results: The mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores in donors who received TEA and ESPB in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (2.7 + 0.9 vs. 2.4 + 0.5; P = 0.02) at one hour (2.7 + 0.9 vs. 2.2 + 0.6; P = 0.008), six hours (1.8 + 0.9 vs. 0.8 + 0.5; P < 0.001), 12 hours (0.9 + 0.7 vs. 0.2 + 0.7; P < 0.001), and 24 hours (0.48 + 0.5 vs. 0.08 + 0.3; P < 0.001) were significantly different. Mean opioid consumption was 3.38 ± 6.24 mg in the ESPB group and 10.75 ± 9.64 mg in the TEA group (P < 0.001). Mean lung volume (MLV) at 24 hours in the TEA group and ESPB group was 1543 ml and 1815 ml (P < 0.001). MLV was 2545 ml in the TEA group and 2820 ml in the ESPB group at 48 hours (P < 0.001). Mean nausea and vomiting score at six hours was 0.1 vs. 0.03 (P = 0.02).

Conclusion: ESPB improves pain control after donor hepatectomy with an enhanced safety profile and reduced opioid consumption.

Abstract No. : ABS0107 : Ultrasound guided lower thoracic erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia following gynaecologic oncology surgery - A randomised controlled trial

Background and Aims:

Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a relatively novel block which provides local and visceral analgesia for abdominal surgery. The present study is aimed to assess the efficacy of ESP block for postoperative analgesia following major open gynaecologic oncology surgery.

Methods:

Sixty female patients posted for elective open gynaecologic oncology surgeries were enroled in this prospective, double blind study and randomised to B and C group. Group B patients received general anaesthesia plus ultrasound guided bilateral ESP block at T9 level at the end of surgery while group C patients received general anaesthesia only. Primary outcome was postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Secondary outcomes were time to first rescue analgesic, 24 hours tramadol consumption, and side effects. Chi square and student t tests were used and P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results:

Postoperative pain scores were lower in B group compared to C group at rest and on movement . Time to first rescue analgesic was prolonged in B group (8.10 ± 1.48 hours) as compared to C group (0.7 ± 0.38 hours) [P < 0.0001]. Total 24 hours tramadol consumption was less in B group (68 ± 48.55 mg) than C group (210 ± 52.65 mg)(table 1) [P < 0.0001].

Conclusion:

Ultrasound guided ESP block with general anaesthesia provides superior postoperative analgesia compared to general anaesthesia alone following major gynaecologic oncology surgeries without any side effects. It can be used as an alternative to epidural analgesia.

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia: Postoperative pain management after Nuss repair for pectus excavatum

AIM OF THE STUDY

Postoperative pain management is a significant challenge in patients undergoing Nuss repair for pectus excavatum chest wall deformity. Therapeutic anesthetic options primarily include patient-controlled intravenous analgesia, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), and cryoanalgesia. However, TEA is limited to inpatient use and both TEA and cryoanalgesia can result in neurologic injury. The novel technique of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane regional analgesia has been used recently in our patients undergoing the Nuss repair and has shown impressive pain relief, but without the potential complications of other modalities. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) postoperative pain management outcomes were studied as compared to TEA.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients with severe pectus excavatum undergoing Nuss repair and placement of ultrasound-guided ESPB were each paired to a historical cohort control patient with TEA postoperative pain management. The cohort patient match was defined by age (± 2 years), gender, and CT pectus index (± 15%). Study variables included hospital length of stay (LOS), pain scores, and pain medication usage.

RESULTS

Pain scores as measured by area under the curve per hour (Day 1: 2.72 (SD = 1.37) vs. 3.90 (SD = 1.81), P = 0.006; Day 2: 2.83 (SD = 1.32) vs. 3.97 (SD = 1.82), P = 0.007) and oral morphine equivalent (OME) pain medication usage (Day 1: 11.9 (SD = 4.9) vs 56.0 (SD = 32.2), P < 0.001; Day 2: 14.7 (SD = 7.1) vs. 38.0 (SD = 21.7), P < 0.001) were higher for the first two postoperative days in the ESPB group. However, mean hospital LOS was nearly one day shorter for ESPB patients (3.78 (SD = 0.82) vs. 2.90 (SD = 0.87), P < 0.001) who were discharged home with the catheter in place until removal, typically at 5-7 days postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided ESPB is thus a feasible, safe, and effective alternative to TEA in postoperative pain management after Nuss repair and results in decreased hospital stay.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Evaluation of Different Pain-Control Procedures for Post-cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Objective

To identify superior pain-control procedures for postoperative patients who undergo cardiac surgeries.

Methods

Literature searches were conducted in globally recognized databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating pain-control procedures after cardiac surgeries. The parameters evaluating analgesic efficacy and postoperative recovery, namely, the pain score and ICU stay, were quantitatively pooled and estimated using Bayesian methods. The values of the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities regarding each parameter were calculated to enable the ranking of various pain-control procedures. Node-splitting analysis was performed to test the inconsistency of the main results, and the publication bias was assessed by examining the funnel-plot symmetry.

Results

After a detailed review, 13 RCTs containing 7 different procedures were included in the network meta-analysis. After pooling the results together, an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and a local parasternal block (LPB) plus target-controlled infusion (TCI) presented the best analgesic effects for reducing pain at rest (SUCRA, .47) and during movement (SUCRA, .52), respectively, while the former also achieved the shortest ICU stay (SUCRA, .48). Moreover, the funnel-plot symmetries showed no inconsistencies or obvious publication bias in the current study.

Conclusions

The current evidence indicates that ESPB is a potential superior analgesic strategy for post-cardiac surgery patients. To verify this conclusion further, it is imperative to obtain more high-quality evidence and conduct relevant investigations in the future.

Comparison of epidural analgesia with ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block in aorto-femoral arterial bypass surgery

Objective:

Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA) was compared with ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block in aorto-femoral arterial bypass surgery for analgesic efficacy, hemodynamic effects, and pulmonary rehabilitation.

Design:

Prospective randomized.

Setting:

Tertiary care centre.

Participants:

Adult patients, who were scheduled for elective aorto-femoral arterial bypass surgery.

Interventions:

It was a prospective pilot study enrolling 20 adult patients who were randomized to group A (ESP block = 10) and group B (TEA = 10). Monitoring of heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pain assessment at rest and deep breathing using visual analog scale (VAS) were done till 48-h post-extubation. Rescue analgesic requirement, Incentive spirometry, oxygenation, duration of ventilation and stay in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) were reported as outcome measures. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired Student T-test or Mann-Whitney U test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results:

HR was lower in group B than group A at 1 and 2 h post- surgery and at 0.5, 16, 20, and 32 h post-extubation (P < 0.05). MAP were lower in group B than A at 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270 minutes and at 0 hour post-surgery and at 4 hours, every 4 hours till 32 hours post-extubation (P < 0.05). Intraoperative midazolam and fentanyl consumption, ventilatory hours, VAS at rest, incentive spirometry, oxygenation, and ICU stay were comparable between the two groups. VAS during deep breathing was more in group A than B at 0.5, 4 hours and every 4 hours till 44 hours post-extubation. The time to receive the first rescue analgesia was shorter in group A than B (P < 0.05).

Conclusion:

Both ESP block and TEA provided comparable analgesia at rest. Further studies with larger sample size are required to evaluate whether ESP block could be an alternative to TEA in aorto-femoral arterial bypass surgery.

Ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block in laparoscopic colon cancer surgery : A randomized controlled prospective trial

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for pain control in other surgeries remains an interesting topic of discussion. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy and quality of recovery of ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB in laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this study 50 patients were included and randomly divided into the intervention group (E group, n = 25) and the control group (C group, n = 25). Patients in the E group received general anesthesia with preoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB, whereas patients in the C group received general anesthesia with saline injection in the erector spinae plane preoperatively. Data on intraoperative and postoperative anesthetic effects and the effect on enhanced recovery after surgery were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Rocuronium consumption in the intervention group was 82.80 ± 21.70 mg, which was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Visual analog scale scores at 2, 6, and 24 h after surgery in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group (F_between = 34.034, P = 0.000). The time to ambulation, consumption of ketorolac tromethamine, time to oral intake and hospital stay after operation in the intervention group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The block area at the different baselines was significant (F_between = 3.211, P = 0.009). The association between baseline and time was significant (F_{baseline * time} = 3.268, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed that ultrasound-guided ESPB technology is safe and beneficial for patients with colon cancer undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery.

Peripheral nerve stimulator guided erector spinae plane block for post-operative analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomies: A feasibility study

Background and Aims:

The pain following total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), a very commonly performed gynaecological surgery, is usually taken care of by various opioids, non-opioids, regional and peripheral nerve blocks. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) under ultrasound guidance is a relatively new approach for postoperative analgesia in thoracic and abdominal surgeries. Ultrasound availability and expertise to use it is a limitation at times. The primary aim of this study was to determine the analgesic efficacy of ESPB using peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) technique in patients undergoing TAH.

Methods:

A total of 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II female patients were posted for abdominal hysterectomy after obtaining ethical committee clearance in a tertiary care centre. Group I (n = 30) received spinal anaesthesia, whereas Group II (n = 30) received ESPB under peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS) guidance with 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine before spinal anaesthesia. Post-operative pain intensity reported using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was considered as the primary outcome. The haemodynamic variables, total duration before the first rescue analgesia, total consumption of tramadol, level of satisfaction regarding analgesia and any complications were considered as secondary outcomes. The data were recorded in an excel sheet, and analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 23.0.

Results:

VAS score was significantly lower (P < 0.001) in Group II at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 h post-operatively. The total dose of rescue analgesia was significantly reduced in the ESPB group.

Conclusion:

PNS-guided ESPB is effective in relieving pain in patients undergoing TAH.

Regional Anesthetic Approaches for Postoperative Analgesia Following Vertebral Body Tethering: A Case Series

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is an innovative surgical technique used to treat juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The optimal anesthetic technique, including the preferred management of postoperative pain, is not known. In this case series, we describe 3 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who received either continuous erector spinae plane block (ESPB) catheters or intercostal liposomal bupivacaine for postoperative pain management after bilateral VBT via minithoracotomy.

Bilateral Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial

BACKGROUND

Major lumbar spine surgery causes severe postoperative pain. The primary objective of this randomized controlled study was to compare the effect of ultrasound (US)-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block on 24-hour postoperative cumulative opioid requirements with standard (opioid-based) analgesia. Postoperative pain control and patient satisfaction were also assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adults scheduled for elective lumbar spine surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to the following (and they are): Control group-no preoperative ESP block, or ESP block group-preoperative bilateral US-guided ESP block. Both groups received standard general anesthesia during surgery. Postoperative pain score, number of patients requiring rescue analgesia, and total morphine consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours were recorded. Patient satisfaction was assessed 24 hours after surgery.

RESULTS

Postoperative morphine consumption was significantly lower in patients in the ESP group compared with those in the control group (1.4±1.5 vs. 7.2±2.0 mg, respectively; P<0.001). All patients in the control group required supplemental morphine compared with only 9 (45%) in the ESP block group (P=0.002). Pain scores immediately after surgery (P=0.002) and at 6 hours after surgery (P=0.040) were lower in the ESP block group compared with the control group. Patient satisfaction scores were more favorable in the block group (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

US-guided ESP block reduces postoperative opioid requirement and improves patient satisfaction compared with standard analgesia in lumbar spine surgery patients.

Opioid-free anesthesia-dexmedetomidine as adjuvant in erector spinae plane block: a case series

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic pain is related to the stretching of the peritoneum and peritoneal irritation caused by insufflation of the parietal peritoneum with carbon dioxide. In 2017, erector spinae plane block (ESPB) was described for management of postoperative pain following open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery. The use of multimodal anesthesia reduces both intraoperative and postoperative opioid use and improves analgesia. The addition of dexmedetomidine to the anesthetic mixture significantly prolongs analgesia, without clinically significant side effects.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe a series of three Caucasian women cases that illustrate the efficacy of bilateral ESPB performed at the level of the T7 transverse process to provide intraoperative and postoperative analgesia for laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

CONCLUSION

Further investigation is recommended to establish the potential for ESPB with dexmedetomidine as adjuvant as an opioid-free anesthetic modality in laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

Erector spinae plane block in laparoscopic nephrectomy as a cause of involuntary hemodynamic instability: A case report

The Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (US-ESPB), used as an anesthesiological block for opioid-sparing approach and for postoperative analgesia, could represent an involuntary cause of hemodynamic instability. This hemodynamic instability is accentuated by a greater diffusion of local anesthetic in the epidural space.

Comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block and peritubal infiltration of levobupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Background and Aims:

Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a simple and safe interfascial plane block reported to provide good analgesia after thoracolumbar surgeries. We compared its efficacy with conventional peritubal local anesthetic infiltration following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Material and Methods:

A total of 60 adult patients posted for elective PCNL were randomly allocated into two groups. Postoperatively, Group I received ultrasound (US) guided peritubular infiltration block with 20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine and Group II received US guided ESP block with 20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine. The two groups were compared for the time to first rescue analgesic (Injection tramadol), number of rescue analgesic demands, total analgesic consumption in first 24 hours, VAS (rest and dynamic) scores and the adverse effects. The data were analyzed by unpaired t-test and Mann Whitney U test.

Results:

The time to first rescue analgesic demand was significantly longer in Group II (6.93 ± 2.15 h vs. 16.21 ± 7.53 h). The VAS scores (rest and dynamic) at eight and twelve hours of measurement were significantly lower in Group II (P < 0.05). The number of analgesic demands were less in group II (2.97 ± 0.49 vs. 1.00 ± 1.05). The total analgesic consumption in first 24 hours was less in Group II (148.33 ± 24.51 mg vs. 51.92 ± 45.78 mg).

Conclusion:

ESP block is a very effective and safe technique to provide prolonged duration of postoperative analgesia following PCNL. Peritubal local anesthetic infiltration is also a reliable technique for postoperative analgesia.

Erector spinae plane block in various abdominal surgeries: A case series

Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a regional anesthesia technique, which provides visceral and somatic analgesia for abdominal surgery; during surgery and in the postoperative period. The local anesthetic is injected between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process and it spreads cranially and caudally into the paravertebral space, affecting the ventral and dorsal branches of the thoracic spinal nerves and the rami communicants that contain sympathetic nerve fibers. ESP block can replace thoracic epidural anesthesia and has a better analgesic effect compared to other plane blocks that are used in abdominal surgery. We described six case series of successfully performed ESP block for postoperative analgesia in various abdominal surgeries such as unilateral open inguinal hernia repair with a supraumbilical hernia, ileostomy reversal surgery, open diaphragmatic hernia repair, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and abdominal abscess evacuation.

Multimodal Anesthesia via Opioid-Free Analgesia and Erector Spinae Plane Block

Multimodal anesthesia, which combines general and epidural anesthesia, is used in surgical cases in which a large or painful incision is anticipated. However, both epidural blocks and opioid-based analgesia have limitations in application. Here, we present a case of supra-infraumbilical laparotomy in a patient whose history of neurostimulator use and marked scoliosis discouraged the placement of an epidural catheter and whose prior adverse response to opioids prohibited their use. The intraoperative and postoperative management of this patient consisted of a combination of analgesia without opioids and erector spinae plane block. Adequate analgesia was achieved, and intraoperative or postoperative opioids were not required. This case illustrates the importance of mastering alternative and multimodal analgesia techniques that can be used in place of classical analgesia techniques when classical analgesia techniques are not appropriate.

Erector spinae plane block and transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in cesarean section: A prospective randomized comparative study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is an interfascial plane block given at the paraspinal region and provides effective visceral and somatic analgesia. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is also an interfascial block that provides adequate somatic pain control. We conducted this study to compare the analgesic efficacy of ESP and TAP blocks with ropivacaine for 48 h after the cesarean section.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty patients scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia, randomly divided into ESP block (n = 30) or TAP block (n = 30) groups. After completion of surgery, ultrasound-guided ESP or TAP block was given using 0.2% ropivacaine (0.2 ml/kg on either side). Postoperatively visual analogue scale (VAS) score and analgesic requirement of each patient was assessed at regular interval for 48 h by a blinded investigator. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 21. Student's t-test and Chi-square test were used for demographic and other data.

RESULTS

ESP block provided prolonged analgesia compared to the TAP block, andthe mean time to first rescue analgesia was 43.53 h and 12.07 h, respectively (P < 0.001). The requirement for total analgesic was also significantly less in the ESP group compared to the TAP group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

ESP block provided prolonged analgesia with a significant decrease in analgesic requirement compared to TAP block and can be used as a standard technique for post-cesarean analgesia.

Anesthesia Experience for Open Gastrostomy with Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Case Report

From the first description in 2016 till today, hundreds of studies have extensively presented Erector Spinae Plane block as an excellent perioperative analgesic technique especially in a multimodal pain management scenario. Only in few cases, this technique was used alone to provide surgical anesthesia.

Safe and Effective Use of Bilateral Erector Spinae Block in Patient Suffering from Post-Operative Coagulopathy Following Hepatectomy

Patient: Male, 75-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Cholangiocarcinoma

Symptoms: Postoperative pain

Medication:—

Clinical Procedure: Continuous erector spinae nerve block

Specialty: Oncology

A case of post-operative posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in children: A preventable neurological catastrophe

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a clinic-radiological syndrome that is generally reversible and may lead to permanent neurological damage if left untreated. PRES has been commonly linked with hypertension along with associated vasogenic oedema. Children are more susceptible to these perturbations due to the narrow range of cerebral autoregulation. PRES must be considered in differentials of any neurological dysfunction which is associated with hypertension in the immediate post-operative period. Inadequate pain control in the post-operative period may cause hypertension that may lead to subsequent PRES. We report a case of postoperative PRES in a 12-year-old previously normotensive child posted for splenectomy with an acute rise in blood pressure in the post-operative period.

Efficacy of bilateral erector spinae plane block in the management of pain: current insights

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a newly described interfascial plane block, and the number of articles on the bilateral application of ESPB is increasing in the literature. In this paper, in addition to analyzing bilateral ESPB cases and studies published so far, we aimed to review the relevant anatomy, describe the mechanism of spread of the injectant, demonstrate varying approaches to ESPB, and summarize case reports and clinical trials, as well as provide current insight on this emerging and popular block. Randomized controlled studies, comparative studies of ESPB versus other methods, and pharmacokinetic studies of bilateral applications must be the next step in clearly understanding bilateral ESPB.

Description of an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and the spread of dye in dog cadavers

OBJECTIVES

To describe a technique to perform an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block and determine the distribution and potential complications after injection of two volumes of methylene blue in dog cadavers.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective experimental cadaveric study.

ANIMALS

A total of eight dog cadavers weighing 9.3 ± 1.9 kg.

METHODS

Ultrasound-guided injections dorsal to the transverse process and ventral to the erector spinae muscles aimed at the fifth thoracic transverse process were performed bilaterally in each dog using 0.5 and 1.0 mL kg^-1 dye solution [low volume (LV) and high volume (HV) treatments, respectively]. Treatments were randomly assigned to the right or left side of each dog, resulting in a total of 16 injections. Anatomical dissections determined dye spread characteristics, including epaxial muscles spread, staining of spinal nerves, dorsal rami, ventral rami (intercostal nerves) and sympathetic trunk spread. Staining indicating potential complications (epidural, mediastinal and intrapleural spread) was recorded.

RESULTS

There was complete staining of at least one dorsal ramus following all injections. A more extensive spread was observed along the muscles in the HV compared with LV (p = 0.036). No significant difference between multisegmental dorsal rami spread (six out of eight injections in each treatment) was noted. Out of 16 injections, one in LV treatment resulted in multisegmental spinal nerve staining and one in HV treatment resulted in ventral ramus (intercostal nerve) staining. Use of anatomic landmarks resulted in inaccurate identification of the fifth transverse process in at least six out of 16 injections (38%). No sympathetic trunk, epidural, mediastinal or intrapleural staining was observed.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Ultrasound-guided ESP injections resulted in extensive staining along the epaxial muscles, as well as staining of the dorsal rami in all dogs. The incidence of dorsal rami mutisegmental spread was the same in both treatments.

The erector spinae plane block: a narrative review

Regional anesthesia and pain management have experienced advances in recent years, especially with the advent of fascial plane blocks. The erector spinae plane block is one of the newest techniques to be described. In the past two years, publications referring to ESP block have increased significantly. The objective of this review is to analyze the articles about ESP block that have been published to date. We performed a search in the main databases and identified 368 articles. After a selection of the relevant articles, 125 studies were found eligible and were included in the review. The ESP block is performed by depositing the local anesthetic in the fascial plane, deeper than the erector spinae muscle at the tip of the transverse process of the vertebra. Many cases of its use have been described with satisfactory results in the treatment of both acute pain and chronic pain. The applicability of the technique covers many clinical scenarios. Of the 98 case reports reviewed, 12 and 87 articles, respectively described the technique as a treatment for chronic pain and acute pain. The single-shot was the most frequently used technique. As described in the articles published to date, the technique is easy to perform and has a low rate of complications. However, despite the effectiveness of the technique, further studies are necessary to obtain more evidence of its actions.