Phase II Study of Irinotecan and Cisplatin Combination Chemotherapy in Metastatic, Unresectable Esophageal Cancer

Efficacy and safety of irinotecan combined with raltitrexed or irinotecan monotherapy for salvage chemotherapy of esophageal squamous cell cancer: A prospective, open label, randomized phase II study

BACKGROUND

Esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) accounts for approximately 90% of esophageal cancer cases in China. There are no standard regimens for second or third-line chemotherapy of metastatic squamous esophageal cancer. The objective of this study was to investigate the security and effectiveness of irinotecan combined with raltitrexed or irinotecan monotherapy for salvage chemotherapy of ESCC.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-eight patients with metastatic ESCC confirmed by histopathology were enrolled into this study. These patients had failure of the first-line chemotherapy combination of fluorouracil or platinum or paclitaxel and had not undergone chemotherapy with irinotecan or raltitrexed previously. Patients were randomly divided into irinotecan combined with raltitrexed group (experiment group) and irinotecan monotherapy group (control group). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

In the control group, the median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS) of patients were 3.37 and 5.3 months. In the experiment group, mPFS and mOS were 3.91 and 7.0 months. There was statistical significance of PFS and OS between two groups (PFS P = 0.002, OS P = 0.01). In subgroup analysis, in the second-line treatment, the mPFS of control and experiment group, was 3.90 and 4.60 months, mOS was 6.95 and 8.5 months, which was statistically significant differences between the two groups. (PFS P = 0.001, OS P = 0.005), In the third-line and beyond treatment, mPFS of control and experiment group was 2.80 and 3.19 months, mOS were 4.5 and 4.8 months. But there was no significant difference of PFS or OS between the two groups (PFS P = 0.19, OS P = 0.31). There was no statistical significance of toxicity side effects between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The PFS and OS of irinotecan plus raltitrexed may be better than that of irinotecan monotherapy, especially in second line treatment, which should be confirmed with a phase III study including much more patients.

Cisplatin-based combination therapy for cancer

Cisplatin, that is, cis-diamminedichloroplatinum is a coordinate compound that is mainly preferred as prior treatment against several solid tumors and malignancies like ovaries, head and neck, testicular, and lung cancers because of its anticancer activity. Cisplatin binds at the N7 position of purine and forms adducts, leading to altered activity of DNA that triggers apoptosis. DNA damage is followed by several signaling pathways like induced oxidative stress, upregulated p53, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK) or Akt pathways along with induced apoptosis. Additionally, cisplatin treatment comes with few disadvantages such as toxic effects, that is, hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, neurotoxicity, etc., and drug resistance. Furthermore, to overcome cisplatin resistance and toxicological effects, combination drug therapy has been considered. The aim of the review is to focus on the molecular mechanism of action of cisplatin and combination drug therapy to reduce the side effects in cancer therapy.

Potent molecular-targeted therapies for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal cancer (EC) remains a public health concern with a high mortality and disease burden worldwide. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a predominant histological subtype of EC that has unique etiology, molecular profiles, and clinicopathological features. Although systemic chemotherapy, including cytotoxic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors, is the main therapeutic option for recurrent or metastatic ESCC patients, the clinical benefits are limited with poor prognosis. Personalized molecular-targeted therapies have been hampered due to the lack of robust treatment efficacy in clinical trials. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop effective therapeutic strategies. In this review, we summarize the molecular profiles of ESCC based on the findings of pivotal comprehensive molecular analyses, highlighting potent therapeutic targets for establishing future precision medicine for ESCC patients, with the most recent results of clinical trials.

Study of PD-1 Inhibitors in Combination with Chemoradiotherapy/Chemotherapy in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in combination with concurrent CRT/CT for patients with inoperable ESCC in the real world and to find predictors for the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors. Patients with unresectable ESCC were evaluated at baseline. The clinical data of patients with ESCC who received CRT/CT with or without PD-1 inhibitor were collected and retrospectively reviewed. The objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed statistically. A total of 96 patients with ESCC were included. As compared with a control group (n = 48), the PFS (6.0 months vs. 5.0 months, p = 0.025) and 6-month OS (70.8% vs. 47.9%, p < 0.001) were significantly longer in the ICIs group (n = 48). There were no significant differences in ORR and 12-month OS between the two groups. In addition, we found that body mass index (BMI) was associated with PFS (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76−0.95, and p = 0.004) and OS (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69−0.98, and p = 0.033) in the ICIs group. PD-1 inhibitors combined with CRT/CT is safe with acceptable complications and improved survival for patients with inoperable ESCC. CRT plus PD-1 inhibitor has superior antitumor efficacy. BMI was positively correlated with the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors.

Rh-Endostatin Plus Irinotecan/Cisplatin as Second-Line Therapy for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Open-Label, Phase II Study

Background

This open-label, phase II study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human endostatin (Rh-endostatin) plus irinotecan/cisplatin as second-line treatment in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

Eligible patients received 15mg/m² Rh-endostatin as a continuous intravenous pump infusion (7 continuous days), 60mg/m² irinotecan (days 1 and 8), and 60mg/m² cisplatin (day 1) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

A total of 50 patients were assessable for efficacy and safety analysis. The median follow-up was 10.97 months (95%CI: 7.03-19.42) as the data cutoff. Median PFS was 4.01 months (95% CI: 3.19-5.49), and median overall survival (OS) was 12.32 months (95% CI: 8.21-17.45); 13 (26%; 95% CI: 15.87-39.55) of 50 patients had an objective response, and 31 (62%; 95% CI: 48.15-74.14) had disease control. Grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 12 (24.0%) patients, and no deaths were reported. The common grade 3 or greater AEs were leucopenia (18.0%) and neutropenia (16.0%). Five (10%) patients discontinued treatment because of AEs.

Conclusion

Rh-endostatin plus irinotecan/cisplatin showed promising anti-tumor activity in advanced ESCC patients with a good safety profile in the second-line setting, which warrants further study in this population. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03797625).

Efficacy of thoracoscopy combined with laparoscopy and esophagectomy and analysis of the risk factors for postoperative infection

OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy of thoracoscopy combined with laparoscopy (TCL) and esophagectomy in patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) and analyze the risk factors for postoperative infection.

METHODS

A total of 122 patients with EC admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into the study group (SG) and the control group (CG), with 61 patients in each group. Patients in the SG were treated with TCL, while patients in the CG were treated with traditional radical surgery for EC. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, swallowing function, length of stay (LOS), number of lymph node dissections, postoperative infection rate, and quality of life in the first month after treatment were recorded and compared between the two groups. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the risk factors for postoperative infection.

RESULTS

The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, LOS, and postoperative infection rate of the SG were significantly lower than those of the CG (all P<0.05). However, the number of lymph node dissections, swallowing function, and quality of life of patients in the SG were significantly higher than those in the CG, with statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). Postoperative hypoproteinemia, diabetes mellitus, and surgical mode were independent risk factors for postoperative infection in patients with EC (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with traditional radical surgery for EC, TCL and resection can effectively reduce trauma, improve the lymph node dissection rate, promote postoperative recovery, and reduce postoperative infection, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion. Hypoproteinemia, diabetes mellitus, and surgical procedures are independent risk factors for postoperative infection in patients with EC. However, with improved medical technologies, the attention to and understanding of these high-risk factors can effectively improve postoperative infection in EC patients.

Self-targeted polymersomal co-formulation of doxorubicin, camptothecin and FOXM1 aptamer for efficient treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

In spite of huge developments in cancer treatment, versatile combinational formulations of different chemotherapeutic agents to enhance anticancer activity while reducing systemic toxicity still remains a challenge. In this regard, in the current study, an amphiphilic hyaluronic acid-b-polycaprolactone diblock copolymer was synthesized using "click chemistry". The synthesized copolymer was self-assembled to form polymersomal structures for co-encapsulation of hydrophilic doxorubicin (DOX) and hydrophobic camptothecin (CPT) in their interior aqueous compartment and their bilayer, respectively with 1:10 and 1:1 ratios. The prepared polymersomal combinational formulation surrounded by hyaluronic acid brush as hydrophilic segment, could provide active targeting of the system against CD44 marker expressed on the surface of cancerous cells. The hyaluronic acid shell could also provide flexible chemistry for the conjugation of therapeutic FOXM1-specific DNA aptamer (Forkhead Box M1; against transcription factor FOXM1) on the surface of polymersomes in order to further suppress cancerous cell proliferation. The obtained results demonstrated that the prepared co-formulation provided sustained, controlled release of the entrapped drugs during 200 h. In vitro cytotoxicity experiments on non-small cell lung cancer, A549 and SK-MES-1 cell lines, demonstrated that the co-formulation of DOX and CPT provided synergistic effect and significantly higher cytotoxicity in comparison with free drugs. The cytotoxicity experiment also indicated that the aptamer conjugation on the co-formulations surface could significantly increase the cytotoxicity and induce apoptosis in combination therapy on both A549 and SK-MES-1 cell lines while aptamer-conjugated blank NPs did not show any cytotoxicity which emphasizes on the sensitization capability of the FOXM1 DNA aptamer against non-small cell lung cancer. Furthermore, it was shown that the co-formulation with or without aptamer renders the formulation specific tumor accumulation in vivo 24 h post-administration, assisting the combination synergy observed in vitro to be translated to in vivo antitumor efficacy. This combinatorial delivery platform strongly offers a novel approach for the synergistic controlled transportation of several chemotherapeutics for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

SHR-1316, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A multicentre, phase 2 study

Background

This multicentre, open‐label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of antiprogrammed death ligand 1 antibody SHR‐1316 plus liposomal irinotecan and 5‐fluorouracil as the first‐line treatment for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

Eligible patients received SHR‐1316 (10 mg/kg), liposomal irinotecan (60 mg/m² for the first cycle, 80 mg/m² thereafter), and 5‐fluorouracil (2400 mg/m²) every 14 days until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

We enrolled 23 patients between 11 March 2019 and 31 May 2019. The median follow‐up duration was 15.2 months (95% CI 14.2–16.2). The median PFS was 8.5 months (95% CI 1.2–15.8), and ORR and DCR were 52.2% (95% CI 30.1–74.3) and 73.9% (95% CI 54.5–93.3), respectively. The median OS was 11.6 months (95% CI 6.7–16.6). The most common treatment‐related grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (17.4%), nausea (13.0%), and anorexia (13.0%). Treatment‐related serious AEs occurred in two patients. No treatment‐related deaths occurred.

Conclusions

SHR‐1316 plus liposomal irinotecan and 5‐fluorouracil has a promising efficacy and manageable safety profile, and could be a new first‐line treatment approach for patients with unresectable locally advanced or distant metastatic ESCC.

Advances in Our Understanding of the Molecular Mechanisms of Action of Cisplatin in Cancer Therapy

Cisplatin and other platinum-based chemotherapeutic drugs have been used extensively for the treatment of human cancers such as bladder, blood, breast, cervical, esophageal, head and neck, lung, ovarian, testicular cancers, and sarcoma. Cisplatin is commonly administered intravenously as a first-line chemotherapy for patients suffering from various malignancies. Upon absorption into the cancer cell, cisplatin interacts with cellular macromolecules and exerts its cytotoxic effects through a series of biochemical mechanisms by binding to Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and forming intra-strand DNA adducts leading to the inhibition of DNA synthesis and cell growth. Its primary molecular mechanism of action has been associated with the induction of both intrinsic and extrinsic pathways of apoptosis resulting from the production of reactive oxygen species through lipid peroxidation, activation of various signal transduction pathways, induction of p53 signaling and cell cycle arrest, upregulation of pro-apoptotic genes/proteins, and down-regulation of proto-oncogenes and anti-apoptotic genes/proteins. Despite great clinical outcomes, many studies have reported substantial side effects associated with cisplatin monotherapy, while others have shown substantial drug resistance in some cancer patients. Hence, new formulations and several combinational therapies with other drugs have been tested for the purpose of improving the clinical utility of cisplatin. Therefore, this review provides a comprehensive understanding of its molecular mechanisms of action in cancer therapy and discusses the therapeutic approaches to overcome cisplatin resistance and side effects.

Clinical efficacy of irinotecan plus raltitrexed chemotherapy in refractory esophageal squamous cell cancer

Our retrospective study assessed the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus raltitrexed in esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) patients who were previously treated with multiple systemic therapies. Between January 2016 and December 2018, records of 38 ESCC patients who underwent irinotecan plus raltitrexed chemotherapy after at least one line of chemotherapy were reviewed. Efficacy assessment was performed every two cycles according to the RECIST version 1.1. A total of 95 cycles of chemotherapy were administered, and the median course was 3 (range 2-6). There was no treatment-related death. Nine patients had partial response, 21 had stable disease and eight had progressive disease. The overall objective response rate was 23.68% (9/38) and the disease control rate was78.94% (30/38). After a median follow-up of 18.5 months, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 105 and 221 days, respectively. There were five patients (13.15%) with grade 3/4 leukopenia, three patients (7.89%) with grade 3/4 neutropenia and one patient (2.63%) with grade 3/4 diarrhea. The combination of irinotecan plus raltitrexed was effective for pretreated ESCC patients. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal dose of the two drugs.

Phase II clinical trial using camrelizumab combined with apatinib and chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Effective therapeutic options are limited for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The incorporation of an immune checkpoint inhibitor and a molecular anti‐angiogenic agent into the commonly adopted chemotherapy may produce synergistic effects. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib combined with chemotherapy as the first‐line treatment of advanced ESCC.

Methods

In this single‐arm prospective phase II trial, patients with unresectable locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic ESCC received camrelizumab 200 mg, liposomal paclitaxel 150 mg/m², and nedaplatin 50 mg/m² on day 1, and apatinib 250 mg on days 1‐14. The treatments were repeated every 14 days for up to 9 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with camrelizumab and apatinib. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

We enrolled 30 patients between August 7, 2018 and February 23, 2019. The median follow‐up was 24.98 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.05‐26.16 months). The centrally assessed ORR was 80.0% (95% CI: 61.4%‐92.3%), with a median duration of response of 9.77 months (range: 1.54 to 24.82+ months). The DCR reached 96.7% (95% CI: 82.8%‐99.9%). The median PFS was 6.85 months (95% CI: 4.46‐14.20 months), and the median OS was 19.43 months (95% CI: 9.93 months – not reached). The most common grade 3‐4 treatment‐related adverse events (AEs) were leukopenia (83.3%), neutropenia (60.0%), and increased aspartate aminotransferase level (26.7%). Treatment‐related serious AEs included febrile neutropenia, leukopenia, and anorexia in one patient (3.3%), and single cases of increased blood bilirubin level (3.3%) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (3.3%). No treatment‐related deaths occurred.

Conclusions

Camrelizumab plus apatinib combined with liposomal paclitaxel and nedaplatin as first‐line treatment demonstrated feasible anti‐tumor activity and manageable safety in patients with advanced ESCC. Randomized trials to evaluate this new combination strategy are warranted.

Trial registration

This trial was registered on July 27, 2018, at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03603756).

Development of chemotherapeutics for unresectable advanced esophageal cancer

INTRODUCTION

The prognosis of unresectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has gradually improved due to efforts for the development of systemic chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

Chemotherapeutic agents such as cytotoxic agents, molecular-targeted agents, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, sometimes used with irradiation, lead in the treatment of unresectable advanced ESCC. Here, we review the latest treatment strategies for unresectable advanced ESCC and discuss future perspectives.

EXPERT OPINION

Immunotherapeutic agents will be part of the treatment of unresectable advanced ESCC in the near future. However, definitive predictive biomarkers to determine good patient candidates remain unclear for immunotherapy in patients with ESCC. Further research is warranted to identify those biomarkers working individually and in combination. Moreover, genome-based therapeutics enable individualized and patient-specific treatment. The development of molecular-targeted drugs against actionable or druggable genes is in progress.

Nivolumab for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and the predictive role of PD-L1 or CD8 expression in its therapeutic effect

INTRODUCTION

Nivolumab, a programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, has recently demonstrated efficacy as second-line therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients in a phase III trial. We report real-world clinical outcomes of nivolumab therapy for ESCC patients.

METHODS

ESCC patients refractory/intolerant to at least one line of chemotherapy and who received nivolumab as a subsequent line of therapy were included. The efficacy and safety of nivolumab and the predictive role of PD-L1 and CD8 expression were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were analyzed for safety and survival outcomes, while 57 were analyzed for objective response rates (ORR) excluding one with no measurable lesions. Eleven patients achieved a partial response, leading to an ORR of 19.3%. The median response duration was 6.5 months (range 4.1-22.4). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 2.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-2.3) and 7.4 (95% CI 4.8-10.0) months, respectively. Among patients with adequate samples, 56.9% (29/51), 27.5% (14/51), and 17.6% (9/51) expressed a combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1, ≥ 10, and ≥ 20, respectively, while 24.4% (11/45) and 57.5% (23/40) were positive for intratumoral and peritumoral CD8 + T cell infiltration, respectively. A significantly longer PFS was observed in patients with a CPS ≥ 20 (7.5 [95% CI 1.8-13.1] vs. 1.9 [1.4-2.3] months, P = 0.05), and a trend towards better survival was seen in those with CPS ≥ 10 or intratumoral CD8 + T cell infiltration.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab is a valuable option at subsequent treatment lines for patients with advanced ESCC.

Treatment of esophageal cancer with multiple liver metastases: a case experience of sustained complete response

Esophageal squamous cell cancer with distant metastases has a poor prognosis. The metastatic sites usually involve the liver, bones, and lungs. Treatment of metastatic disease is essentially palliative and based on chemoradiotherapy. A 57-year-old man with a solitary metastatic mass of 82 × 58 mm in the left liver was treated on 19 October 2012. Irinotecan and cisplatin combination chemotherapy and nimotuzumab targeted therapy were administered. The liver metastatic mass was treated by stereotactic Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Complete remission of the primary disease and hepatic lesion was achieved, and no local or distant recurrence was found during the 7-year follow-up. Because extrahepatic lesions were ruled out and the local disease was completely locoregionally controlled, the use of stereotactic Gamma Knife radiosurgery to remove the hepatic lesion was justified and produced a reasonable outcome.

Safety and Effectiveness of Chemotherapy for Metastatic Esophageal Cancer in a Community Hospital in Brazil

PURPOSE

Despite epidemiologic and molecular differences between esophageal and stomach cancers, most published studies have included patients with either disease in a metastatic scenario. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of chemotherapy in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer in the community setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with synchronous metastatic esophageal cancer treated at a public hospital between 2008 and 2016. Patients were grouped according to a prescribed chemotherapy protocol: platinum and taxane (group A); platinum and irinotecan (group B); platinum and fluoropyrimidine (group C); and without platinum (group D).

RESULTS

Of the 1,789 patients with esophageal cancer treated, we included 397 with metastatic disease at presentation. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most frequent histology (78.8%). Median overall survival (OS) was 7 months (95% CI, 6.15 to 7.85 months). Chemotherapy was administered to 285 patients, who reached a median OS of 9.0 months (95% CI, 8.0 to 9.9 months); for 112 patients who did not receive treatment, median OS was 3 months (95% CI, 2.3 to 3.7 months; P < .001). The most used combination was platinum plus irinotecan (A; 55.5%). Disease control with in groups A, B, C, and D was 39.2%, 30.1%, 53% and 14.3%, respectively. Patients in group C reached a median OS of 17 months (95% CI, 13.1 to 20.8 months; P = .034). No differences were observed in median OS obtained with other protocols (9 months). The toxicity profile was different according to chemotherapy, with more severe events (hematologic, diarrhea, and number of days hospitalized) occurring in group B.

CONCLUSION

Platinum plus paclitaxel or platinum plus irinotecan provided similar OS in community patients, although patients receiving irinotecan experienced more severe events. In the adenocarcinoma population, a fluoropyrimidine plus platinum–based regimen, although less frequently used, had a more favorable toxicity profile, with superior median OS and disease control.

Jiawei Xianglian Decoction (JWXLD), a Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Alleviates CPT-11-Induced Diarrhea in Mice

Irinotecan (CPT-11) is used for therapy of various cancers. However, it has several serious adverse reactions such as diarrhea which is caused by SN-38, the active form of CPT-11. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Jiawei xianglian decoction (JWXLD), which has been widely used for the treatment of diarrhea in China. In this study, a mouse model with delayed diarrhea was generated by CPT-11. Real-time PCR and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were performed to explore intestinal microflora and inflammatory cytokine. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was used to analyze tissue morphology. We found that 0.12, 0.23, and 0.46 g JWXLD significantly reduced the severity of CPT-11-induced diarrhea. The levels of Lactobacillus (Lacto) and Bifidobacterium (Bifid) were significantly downregulated by CPT-11, and these effects can be reversed by JWXLD treatment. Furthermore, JWXLD was observed to decrease the activity of β-glucuronidase (β-GD). Histopathological data showed that CPT-11 induced severe intestinal mucosal injury, which was characterized as grade 6, and JWXLD significantly alleviated the injury. In addition, CPT-11 increased the productions of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), tumor necrosis factor-beta (TNF-β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-1 (IL-1), but decreased interleukin-15 (IL-15), interleukin-7 (IL-7), and uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1). In conclusion, JWXLD can counteract these effects caused by CPT-11 treatment. JWXLD could alleviate CPT-11-induced diarrhea.

Systemic treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: chemotherapy, molecular-targeting therapy and immunotherapy

Systemic treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) mainly consists of cytotoxic agents, aiming to palliate symptoms and prolong survival. Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil have been considered standard treatment for several decades. Efforts to develop more effective treatment have led to clinical trials testing triplet, irinotecan-based, oxaliplatin-based and paclitaxel-based regimens. Molecular-targeting agents, mainly anti-EGFR inhibitors including gefitinib, panitumumab and nimotuzumab, have been investigated; however, no molecular-targeting agents demonstrate the clinical utility in Phase 3 trials so far. Negative results from Phase 3 trials testing gefitinib and panitumumab suggest the importance of identifying predictive biomarkers of responses to molecular-targeting agents. On the basis of results from Phase 3 trials testing PD-1 inhibitors, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, are anticipated to be the standard treatment for patients with ESCC. Dual immune checkpoint inhibition and immunotherapy in combination with cytotoxic agents are under study. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing technologies provide comprehensive catalogues of genetic alterations in ESCC which may lead to therapeutic breakthroughs in a personalized manner. Here, we review the existing clinical data and discuss future perspectives with a focus on the systemic treatment of advanced ESCC.

A combination of irinotecan/cisplatinum and irinotecan/temozolomide or tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R arrest doxorubicin- and temozolomide-resistant myxofibrosarcoma in a PDOX mouse model

Myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) is the most common sarcomas in elderly patients and is either chemo-resistant or recurs with metastasis after chemotherapy. This recalcitrant cancer in need of improved treatment. We have established a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) of MFS. The MFS PDOX model was established in the biceps femoris of nude mice and randomized into 7 groups of 7 mice each: control; doxorubicin (DOX); pazopanib (PAZ); temozolomide (TEM); Irinotecan (IRN); IRN combined with TEM; IRN combined with cisplatinum (CDDP) and Salmonella typhimurium A1-R (S. typhimurium A1-R). Treatment was evaluated by relative tumor volume and relative body weight. The MFS PDOX models were DOX, PAZ, and TEM resistant. IRN combined with TEM and IRN combined with CDDP were most effective on the MFS PDOX. S. typhimurium A1-R arrested the MFS PDOX tumor. There was no significant body weight loss in any group. The present study suggests that the combination of IRN with either TEM or CDDP, and S. typhimurium have clinical potential for MFS.

Human non‑small cell lung cancer cells can be sensitized to camptothecin by modulating autophagy

Lung cancer is a prevalent disease and is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Despite the development of various anticancer drugs, the prognosis of lung cancer is relatively poor. Metastasis of lung cancer, as well as chemoresistance, is associated with a high mortality rate for patients with lung cancer. Camptothecin (CPT) is a well-known anticancer drug, which causes cancer cell apoptosis via the induction of DNA damage; however, the cytotoxicity of CPT easily reaches a plateau at a relatively high dose in lung cancer cells, thus limiting its efficacy. The present study demonstrated that CPT may induce autophagy in two human non‑small cell lung cancer cell lines, H1299 and H460. In addition, the results of a viability assay and Annexin V staining revealed that CPT-induced autophagy could protect lung cancer cells from programmed cell death. Conversely, the cytotoxicity of CPT was increased when autophagy was blocked by 3-methyladenine treatment. Furthermore, inhibition of autophagy enhanced the levels of CPT-induced DNA damage in the lung cancer cell lines. Accordingly, these findings suggested that autophagy exerts a protective role in CPT-treated lung cancer cells, and the combination of CPT with a specific inhibitor of autophagy may be considered a promising strategy for the future treatment of lung cancer.

Combination of histoculture drug response assay and qPCR as an effective method to screen biomarkers for personalized chemotherapy in esophageal cancer

Personalized chemotherapy with the use of biomarkers helps to maximize clinical efficiency. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify a potential method for identifying biomarkers in esophageal cancer. A total of 49 freshly resected tumor tissues and 72 paraffin-embedded specimens from patients with esophageal cancer were obtained. mRNA expression levels of ERCC1, BRCA1, TUBB3, FBW7, RRM1, MDM2, TS and TOP1 were measured quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). In vitro chemosensitivity to cisplatin, docetaxel, gemcitabine, etoposide, fluorouracil and irinotecan were tested using histoculture drug response assay (HDRA). BRCA1 mRNA levels were positively correlated with resistance to cisplatin (P=0.027) and sensitivity to docetaxel (P=0.002). TS mRNA levels were inversely correlated with fluorouracil sensitivity (P=0.044), and TOP1 mRNA expression was positively correlated with irinotecan sensitivity (P=0.008). In addition, high BRCA1 mRNA levels correlated with decreased median overall survival (mOS; P<0.001) and response rate (RR; P=0.002) in cisplatin-fluorouracil chemotherapy group and also correlated with increased mOS (P<0.001) and RR (P=0.023) in docetaxel-fluorouracil chemotherapy group. Overall, these results suggested that HDRA combined with RT-qPCR may serve as an effective method for screening biomarkers in personalized chemotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Relationship between UGT1A1*6/*28 gene polymorphisms and the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan-based chemotherapy

Purpose

A retrospective study was performed to analyze the relationship between uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) *6/*28 gene polymorphisms and adverse reactions associated with irinotecan (CPT-11)-based chemotherapy. The correlation between UGT1A1 polymorphisms and the clinical efficacy of CPT-11 was also analyzed, along with the influence of age and tumor type.

Patients and methods

Patients administered a CPT-11-based regimen in the Beijing Cancer Hospital from April 2015 to September 2016 were included in our study (n=81). Blood samples for detecting UGT1A1 were collected from each patient after various administration regimens.

Results

Colorectal cancer patients with the UGT1A1*6 mutant genotype had a significantly higher risk of severe delayed diarrhea than that of wild-type individuals when administered a CPT-11 dose ≥130 mg/m² (P=0.042); the same phenomenon was observed when the UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28 mutant genotypes were considered together (P=0.028). However, in lung cancer patients administered a low dose of CPT-11, UGT1A1*6/*28 variants were not significantly associated with severe neutropenia or delayed diarrhea. Furthermore, adult patients with the UGT1A1*6 mutation were more likely to develop severe delayed diarrhea than did wild-type adults (P=0.013); however, the difference was not significant in elderly patients. No significant differences in tumor response were found among the different genotypes (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Thus, age and tumor type influence our ability to predict adverse reactions based on UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms in cancer patients. Further, UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms are not correlated with the efficacy of CPT-11-based regimens.

ECRG2 enhances the anti-cancer effects of cisplatin in cisplatin-resistant esophageal cancer cells via upregulation of p53 and downregulation of PCNA

AIM

To explore the anti-tumor effects of esophageal cancer-related gene 2 (ECRG2) in combination with cisplatin (DDP) in DDP-resistant esophageal cancer cells (EC9706/DDP).

METHODS

A drug-resistant cell model was established, with EC9706/DDP cells being treated with ECRG2 and/or DDP. Cell viability was examined by MTT assay. The rate of cell apoptosis was determined by flow cytometry. The mRNA expression levels of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), metallothionein (MT), and p53 were determined by RT-PCR and PCNA, while MT and p53 protein expression levels were determined by western blotting.

RESULTS

The anti-proliferative effect of ECRG2 in combination with DDP was superior when compared to ECRG2 or DDP alone. The inhibition rate for the combination reached its peak (51.33%) at 96 h. The early apoptotic rates of the control, ECRG2 alone, DDP alone, and ECRG2 plus DDP groups were 5.71% ± 0.27%, 12.68% ± 0.61%, 14.15% ± 0.87%, and 27.96% ± 0.36%, respectively. Although all treatment groups were significantly different from the control group (P < 0.05), the combination treatment of ECRG2 plus DDP performed significantly better when compared to either ECRG2 or DDP alone (P < 0.05). The combination of ECRG2 and DDP significantly upregulated p53 mRNA and protein levels and downregulated PCNA mRNA and protein levels compared to ECRG2 or DDP alone (P < 0.05). However, no changes were seen in the expression of MT mRNA or protein.

CONCLUSION

ECRG2 in combination with DDP can inhibit viability and induce apoptosis in esophageal cancer DDP-resistant cells, possibly via upregulation of p53 expression and downregulation of PCNA expression. These findings suggest that the combination of ECRG2 and DDP may be a promising strategy for the clinical treatment of esophageal cancers that are resistant to DDP.