Understanding quantitative polymerase chain reaction bioanalysis issues before validation planning: Japan Bioanalysis Forum discussion group

Using qPCR and ddPCR to study biodistribution of cell therapy products: a multi-site evaluation

BACKGROUD AIMS

Regenerative therapies employing cell therapy products (CTPs) have attracted considerable attention. Biodistribution (BD) evaluation of CTPs is mainly performed to clarify the cell survival time, engraftment, and distribution site. This evaluation is crucial for predicting the efficacy and safety profiles of clinical studies based on non-clinical BD study outcomes. However, no internationally unified method has been established for assessing cell BD after administration. Here, we aimed to standardize the BD assay method used for CTPs, conducting the following evaluations using the same protocol across multiple study facilities: (1) in vitro validation of quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) analyses using the primate-specific Alu gene, and (2) in vivo BD studies after the intravenous administration of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) to immunodeficient mice, commonly used in non-clinical tumorigenicity studies.

METHODS

Quality control samples were prepared and analyzed by adding a fixed number of human-derived cells to several mouse tissues. The respective quantitative performances of the qPCR and ddPCR methods were compared for accuracy and precision. hMSCs were intravenously administered to immunodeficient mice, and tissues were collected at 1, 4, and 24 h after administration.

RESULTS

Both methods demonstrated an accuracy (relative error) generally within ±50% and a precision (coefficient of variation) generally less than 50%. While differences in calibration curve ranges were observed between qPCR and ddPCR, no significant differences in quantification were found among the assay facilities. The BD of hMSCs in mice was evaluated at seven facilities (qPCR at three facilities; ddPCR at four facilities), revealing similar tissue distribution profiles in all facilities, with the lungs showing the highest cell distribution among the tissues tested.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative evaluation of qPCR and ddPCR using Alu sequences was conducted, demonstrating that the test method can be adapted for BD evaluation.

Review on the bioanalysis of non-virus-based gene therapeutics

Over the past years, gene therapeutics have held great promise for treating many inherited and acquired diseases. The increasing number of approved gene therapeutics and developing clinical pipelines demonstrate the potential to treat diseases by modifying their genetic blueprints in vivo. Compared with conventional treatments targeting proteins rather than underlying causes, gene therapeutics can achieve enduring or curative effects via gene activation, inhibition, and editing. However, the delivery of DNA/RNA to the target cell to alter the gene expression is a complex process that involves, crossing numerous barriers in both the extracellular and intracellular environment. Generally, the delivery strategies can be divided into viral-based and non-viral-based vectors. This review summarizes various bioanalysis strategies that support the non-virus-based gene therapeutics research, including pharmacokinetics (PK)/toxicokinetics (TK), biodistribution, immunogenicity evaluations for the gene cargo, vector, and possible expressed protein, and highlights the challenges and future perspectives of bioanalysis strategies in non-virus-based gene therapeutics. This review may provide new insights and directions for the development of emerging bioanalytical methods, offering technical support and a research foundation for innovative gene therapy treatments.

Highlights of the 15th Japan Bioanalysis Forum Symposium

The 15th Japan Bioanalysis Forum (JBF) Symposium was held in Kyoto, Japan, between 5 and 7 February 2024. The conference theme, 'Toward the new world - Science as a universal endeavor' indicated that universal discussion based on science is making a basis of regulatory and analytical sciences, now internationally harmonized. The symposium discussed a wide range of topics, including ICH M10, quantitative PCR, immunogenicity, peptide LC-MS, e-notebooks, artificial intelligence, reliability standards, carrier development, inviting domestic and overseas experts. Approximately 360 attendees from various fields, including pharmaceutical companies, contract research organizations, academia and regulators, gathered in person or online.

Utilizing droplet digital polymerase chain reaction for siRNA quantitation in rodent plasma and tissue via stem-loop reverse transcription

Background: siRNA is a promising therapeutic modality highlighted by several US FDA approvals since 2018, with many more oligonucleotide assets in clinical development. To support siRNA discovery and development, robust and sensitive quantitative platforms for bioanalysis must be established to assess pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships and toxicology. Droplet digital PCR offers improved sensitivity and throughput, as well as reduced susceptibility to matrix effects, compared with other analytical platforms. Methodology: The authors developed a stem-loop reverse transcription droplet digital PCR method to measure siRNA in mouse plasma and liver extract using bioanalytical method qualification guidelines. Conclusion: This newly developed assay has been demonstrated to be a superior alternative to other platforms, with the added benefit of greater sensitivity, with dynamic range from 390 to 400,000 copies/reaction and readiness for FDA investigational new drug-enabling applications.

Recommendations for Method Development and Validation of qPCR and dPCR Assays in Support of Cell and Gene Therapy Drug Development

The emerging use of qPCR and dPCR in regulated bioanalysis and absence of regulatory guidance on assay validations for these platforms has resulted in discussions on lack of harmonization on assay design and appropriate acceptance criteria for these assays. Both qPCR and dPCR are extensively used to answer bioanalytical questions for novel modalities such as cell and gene therapies. Following cross-industry conversations on the lack of information and guidelines for these assays, an American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists working group was formed to address these gaps by bringing together 37 industry experts from 24 organizations to discuss best practices to gain a better understanding in the industry and facilitate filings to health authorities. Herein, this team provides considerations on assay design, development, and validation testing for PCR assays that are used in cell and gene therapies including (1) biodistribution; (2) transgene expression; (3) viral shedding; (4) and persistence or cellular kinetics of cell therapies.

Development of Human Rhinovirus RNA Reference Material Using Digital PCR

The human rhinovirus (RV) is a positive-stranded RNA virus that causes respiratory tract diseases affecting both the upper and lower halves of the respiratory system. RV enhances its replication by concentrating RNA synthesis within a modified host membrane in an intracellular compartment. RV infections often occur alongside infections caused by other respiratory viruses, and the RV virus may remain asymptomatic for extended periods. Alongside qualitative detection, it is essential to accurately quantify RV RNA from clinical samples to explore the relationships between RV viral load, infections caused by the virus, and the resulting symptoms observed in patients. A reference material (RM) is required for quality evaluation, the performance evaluation of molecular diagnostic products, and evaluation of antiviral agents in the laboratory. The preparation process for the RM involves creating an RV RNA mixture by combining RV viral RNA with RNA storage solution and matrix. The resulting RV RNA mixture is scaled up to a volume of 25 mL, then dispensed at 100 µL per vial and stored at -80 °C. The process of measuring the stability and homogeneity of RV RMs was conducted by employing reverse transcription droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (RT-ddPCR). Digital PCR is useful for the analysis of standards and can help to improve measurement compatibility: it represents the equivalence of a series of outcomes for reference materials and samples being analyzed when a few measurement procedures are employed, enabling objective comparisons between quantitative findings obtained through various experiments. The number of copies value represents a measured result of approximately 1.6 × 105 copies/μL. The RM has about an 11% bottle-to-bottle homogeneity and shows stable results for 1 week at temperatures of 4 °C and -20 °C and for 12 months at a temperature of -80 °C. The developed RM can enhance the dependability of RV molecular tests by providing a precise reference value for the absolute copy number of a viral target gene. Additionally, it can serve as a reference for diverse studies.

Development and validation of qPCR methods for nucleic acid biomarkers as a drug development tool: points to consider

Nucleic acid (NA) biomarkers play critical roles in drug development. However, the global regulatory guidelines for assessing quantification methods specific to NA biomarkers are limited. The validation of analytical methods is crucial for the use of biomarkers in clinical and post-marketing evaluations of drug efficacy and adverse reactions. Given that quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and reverse transcription qPCR (RT-qPCR) methods are the gold standards for the quantification of NA biomarkers, the Biomarker Analytical Method Validation Study Group in Japan has discussed considerations and made recommendations for the development and validation of qPCR- and RT-qPCR-based analytical methods for endogenous NA biomarkers as drug development tools. This white paper aims to contribute to the global harmonization of NA biomarker assay validation.

Drug Regulatory-Compliant Validation of a qPCR Assay for Bioanalysis Studies of a Cell Therapy Product with a Special Focus on Matrix Interferences in a Wide Range of Organ Tissues

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) has emerged as an important bioanalytical method for assessing the pharmacokinetics of human-cell-based medicinal products after xenotransplantation into immunodeficient mice. A particular challenge in bioanalytical qPCR studies is that the different tissues of the host organism can affect amplification efficiency and amplicon detection to varying degrees, and ignoring these matrix effects can easily cause a significant underestimation of the true number of target cells in a sample. Here, we describe the development and drug regulatory-compliant validation of a TaqMan® qPCR assay for the quantification of mesenchymal stromal cells in the range of 125 to 20,000 cells/200 µL lysate via the amplification of a human-specific, highly repetitive α-satellite DNA sequence of the chromosome 17 centromere region HSSATA17. An assessment of matrix effects in 14 different mouse tissues and blood revealed a wide range of spike recovery rates across the different tissue types, from 11 to 174%. Based on these observations, we propose performing systematic spike-and-recovery experiments during assay validation and correcting for the effects of the different tissue matrices on cell quantification in subsequent bioanalytical studies by multiplying the back-calculated cell number by tissue-specific factors derived from the inverse of the validated percent recovery rate.