Proton stereotactic radiosurgery in management of persistent acromegaly

Controversies in neuro-oncology: Focal proton versus photon radiation therapy for adult brain tumors

Radiation therapy (RT) plays a fundamental role in the treatment of malignant and benign brain tumors. Current state-of-the-art photon- and proton-based RT combines more conformal dose distribution of target volumes and accurate dose delivery while limiting the adverse radiation effects. PubMed was systematically searched from from 2000 to October 2023 to identify studies reporting outcomes related to treatment of central nervous system (CNS)/skull base tumors with PT in adults. Several studies have demonstrated that proton therapy (PT) provides a reduced dose to healthy brain parenchyma compared with photon-based (xRT) radiation techniques. However, whether dosimetric advantages translate into superior clinical outcomes for different adult brain tumors remains an open question. This review aims at critically reviewing the recent studies on PT in adult patients with brain tumors, including glioma, meningiomas, and chordomas, to explore its potential benefits compared with xRT.

Recurrent acromegaly: a systematic review on therapeutic approaches

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Management of recurrent acromegaly is challenging for both neurosurgeons and endocrinologists. Several treatment options including repeat surgery, medical therapy, and radiation are offered for such patients. The efficacy of these modalities for the treatment of recurrence has not been studied previously in the literature. In this study, we aim to systematically review the existing cases of recurrence and come to a conclusion regarding the appropriate treatment in such cases.

METHOD

A systematic review was performed through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane database to identify studies reporting the treatment outcome of recurrent acromegaly patients. Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, the included studies were reviewed for primary and secondary treatment, complications, and outcomes of the secondary treatment.

RESULTS

The systematic review retrieved 23 records with 95 cases of recurrent acromegaly. The mean time of recurrence was 4.16 years after the initial treatment. The most common primary treatment was surgery followed by radiotherapy. The remission rate was significantly higher in medical and radiotherapy compared to surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

In cases of recurrent acromegaly, the patient may benefit more from radiotherapy and medical therapy compared to surgery. As the quality of evidence is low on this matter feature studies specifically designed for recurrent patients are needed.

Hypofractionated proton therapy for benign tumors of the central nervous system: A systematic review of the literature

AIMS

Aim of the present analysis was to report results of a systematic review of the literature in the setting of patients treated with hypoF PT for benign lesions of the central nervous system (CNS).

METHODS

The methodology complied with the PRISMA recommendations. PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus databases were interrogated in September 2022.

RESULTS

Twelve papers have been selected including patients treated for base of the skull meningiomas (6 papers), vestibular schwannoma (3 papers) and pituitary adenomas (3 papers). Clinical outcomes were evaluated with both radiologic images and clinical parameters. Long-term toxicity was reported in all but one series with an incidence ranging from 2 % to 7 % in patients treated for base of skull meningioma and 1-9 % for schwannoma.

CONCLUSIONS

HypoF PT is a safe and effective treatment in selected benign tumors of the CNS. Further dosimetric and clinical comparisons are required to better refine the patients' selection criteria.

The role of particle radiotherapy in the treatment of skull base tumors

The skull base is an anatomically and functionally critical area surrounded by vital structures such as the brainstem, the spinal cord, blood vessels, and cranial nerves. Due to this complexity, management of skull base tumors requires a multidisciplinary approach involving a team of specialists such as neurosurgeons, otorhinolaryngologists, radiation oncologists, endocrinologists, and medical oncologists. In the case of pediatric patients, cancer management should be performed by a team of pediatric-trained specialists. Radiation therapy may be used alone or in combination with surgery to treat skull base tumors. There are two main types of radiation therapy: photon therapy and particle therapy. Particle radiotherapy uses charged particles (protons or carbon ions) that, due to their peculiar physical properties, permit precise targeting of the tumor with minimal healthy tissue exposure. These characteristics allow for minimizing the potential long-term effects of radiation exposure in terms of neurocognitive impairments, preserving quality of life, and reducing the risk of radio-induced cancer. For these reasons, in children, adolescents, and young adults, proton therapy should be an elective option when available. In radioresistant tumors such as chordomas and sarcomas and previously irradiated recurrent tumors, particle therapy permits the delivery of high biologically effective doses with low, or however acceptable, toxicity. Carbon ion therapy has peculiar and favorable radiobiological characteristics to overcome radioresistance features. In low-grade tumors, proton therapy should be considered in challenging cases due to tumor volume and involvement of critical neural structures. However, particle radiotherapy is still relatively new, and more research is needed to fully understand its effects. Additionally, the availability of particle therapy is limited as it requires specialized equipment and expertise. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the available literature regarding the role of particle radiotherapy in the treatment of skull base tumors.

Dosimetric parameters associated with the long-term oncological outcomes of Gamma Knife surgery for sellar and parasellar tumors in pediatric patients

OBJECTIVE

The authors aimed to investigate the dosimetric parameter and the minimally required dose associated with long-term control of sellar and parasellar tumors after Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) in children.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on pediatric patients younger than 19 years of age who were diagnosed with sellar and parasellar tumors and received GKS at the authors' institution from 1998 to 2019. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to investigate the dosimetric parameters associated with treatment outcome. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze tumor control rates after GKS.

RESULTS

Overall, 37 patients with 40 sellar and parasellar tumors, including 22 craniopharyngiomas and 12 pituitary adenomas, had a mean follow-up of 85.8 months. The gross target volume was 0.05 cm3 to 15.28 cm3, and the mean marginal dose was 15.8 Gy (range 9.6-30.0 Gy). Ten patients experienced treatment failure at a mean of 28.0 ± 26.7 months. The actuarial 5- and 10-year tumor control rates were 79.0% and 69.8%, respectively. D98% was an independent predictive factor of tumor control (HR 0.846 [95% CI 0.749-0.956], p = 0.007), with a cutoff value of 11.5 Gy for the entire cohort and 10 Gy for the craniopharyngioma group. Visual deterioration occurred in 2 patients with the maximum point dose of 10.1 Gy and 10.6 Gy to the optic apparatus.

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric patients, D98% was a reliable index of the minimum required dose for long-term control of sellar and parasellar tumors after GKS. The optimal D98% value for each tumor diagnosis needs to be elucidated in the future.

Proton and Heavy Particle Intracranial Radiosurgery

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) involves the delivery of a highly conformal ablative dose of radiation to both benign and malignant targets. This has traditionally been accomplished in a single fraction; however, fractionated approaches involving five or fewer treatments have been delivered for larger lesions, as well as lesions in close proximity to radiosensitive structures. The clinical utilization of SRS has overwhelmingly involved photon-based sources via dedicated radiosurgery platforms (e.g., Gamma Knife® and Cyberknife®) or specialized linear accelerators. While photon-based methods have been shown to be highly effective, advancements are sought for improved dose precision, treatment duration, and radiobiologic effect, among others, particularly in the setting of repeat irradiation. Particle-based techniques (e.g., protons and carbon ions) may improve many of these shortcomings. Specifically, the presence of a Bragg Peak with particle therapy at target depth allows for marked minimization of distal dose delivery, thus mitigating the risk of toxicity to organs at risk. Carbon ions also exhibit a higher linear energy transfer than photons and protons, allowing for greater relative biological effectiveness. While the data are limited, utilization of proton radiosurgery in the setting of brain metastases has been shown to demonstrate 1-year local control rates >90%, which are comparable to that of photon-based radiosurgery. Prospective studies are needed to further validate the safety and efficacy of this treatment modality. We aim to provide a comprehensive overview of clinical evidence in the use of particle therapy-based radiosurgery.

Management of persistent acromegaly following primary therapy: The current landscape in the UK

Acromegaly is the clinical consequence of chronic exposure of the tissues to excess GH and IGF-I. It is almost exclusively the result of a GH-secreting pituitary adenoma. In addition to the somatic features, uncontrolled acromegaly is associated with a number of complications and excess mortality. Management is aimed at control of the tumour; normalization of GH and IGF-I secretion and relief of symptoms. Initial management of GH-secreting pituitary adenoma is widely accepted as endonasal trans-sphenoidal surgery, with second-line therapy where disease is uncontrolled in most cases being somatostatin analogue therapy. With the combination of surgery and somatostatin analogue therapy, control is achieved in around 75% of patients; however, this leaves a significant proportion of patients requiring multimodality therapy to achieve remission. Within the UK, the health system has finite resources, and decisions for management require consideration of efficacy and cost-effectiveness. To add to the complexity, subtle differences exist in availability of high-cost medications used in the treatment of patients with acromegaly across the devolved nations of the UK. In this article, we discuss options for the management of persistent acromegaly following initial surgery and somatostatin analogue therapy, and explore earlier use of dopaminergics and conservative management.

The Promise of Proton Therapy for Central Nervous System Malignancies

Radiation therapy plays a significant role in management of benign and malignant diseases of the central nervous system. Patients may be at risk of acute and late toxicity from radiation therapy due to dose deposition in critical normal structures. In contrast to conventional photon delivery techniques, proton therapy is characterized by Bragg peak dose deposition which results in decreased exit dose beyond the target and greater sparing of normal structure which may reduce the rate of late toxicities from treatment. Dosimetric studies have demonstrated reduced dose to normal structures using proton therapy as compared to photon therapy. In addition, clinical studies are being reported demonstrating safety, feasibility, and low rates of acute toxicity. Technical challenges in proton therapy remain, including full understanding of depth of proton penetration and the biological activity in the distal Bragg peak. In addition, longer clinical follow-up is required to demonstrate reduction in late toxicities as compared to conventional photon-based radiation techniques. In this review, we summarize the current clinical literature and areas of active investigation in proton therapy for adult central nervous system malignancies.

The risk/benefit ratio of radiotherapy in pituitary tumors

Radiation therapy (RT) is an effective treatment for patients with either nonfunctioning or secreting pituitary adenomas unsuccessfully treated by surgery and/or medical therapy, resulting in local control of 90-95% at 5-10 years and variable normalization of hormonal hypersecretion for patients with GH-, ACTH-, and prolactin-secreting adenomas in the range of 40-80% at 5 years; however, its use has been limited because of concerns regarding potential late toxicity of radiation and delayed efficacy in normalization of hormone hypersecretion. In the last decades, there have been advances in all aspects of radiation treatment, including more accurate immobilization, imaging, treatment planning and dose delivery. RT has evolved with the development of highly conformal stereotactic techniques and new planning and dose delivery techniques, including intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). All these new techniques allow precise and sharply focused radiation delivery reducing the dose to surrounding critical neurovascular and brain structures, and potentially limiting the long-term consequences of radiation treatments. In this review, we present a critical analysis of the more recent available literature on the use of RT in patients with both nonfunctioning and secreting pituitary adenomas, focussing particularly on the risk/benefit ratio of modern radiation techniques.

Proton Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: A Single-Institution Analysis of 370 Patients

PURPOSE

To report the first series of proton stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of patients with single or multiple brain metastases, including failure patterns, survival outcomes, and toxicity analysis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This was a single-institution, retrospective study of 815 metastases from 370 patients treated with proton SRS between April 1991 and November 2016. Cumulative incidence estimates of local failure, distant brain failure, and pathologically confirmed radionecrosis and Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival were calculated. Fine and Gray and Cox regressions were performed to ascertain whether clinical and treatment factors were associated with the described endpoints.

RESULTS

The median follow-up from proton SRS was 9.2 months. The 6- and 12-month estimates of local failure, distant brain failure, and overall survival were 4.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0%-5.9%) and 8.5% (95% CI 6.7%-10.6%), 39.1% (95% CI 34.1%-44.0%) and 48.2% (95% CI 43.0%-53.2%), and 76.0% (95% CI 71.3%-80.0%) and 51.5% (95% CI 46.3%-56.5%), respectively. The median survival was 12.4 months (95% CI 10.8-14.0 months) after proton SRS. The most common symptoms were low-grade fatigue (12.5%), headache (10.0%), motor weakness (6.2%), seizure (5.8%), and dizziness (5.4%). The rate of pathologically confirmed radionecrosis at 12 months was 3.6% (95% CI 2.0%-5.8%), and only target volume was associated on multivariate analysis (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.13, 95% CI 1.0-1.20).

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported series of proton SRS for the management of brain metastases. Moderate-dose proton SRS is well tolerated and can achieve good local control outcomes, comparable to those obtained with conventional photon SRS strategies. Although proton SRS remains resource-intensive, future strategies evaluating its selective utility in patients who would benefit most from integral dose reduction should be explored.

Management of nonfunctioning pituitary tumors: radiotherapy

External beam radiotherapy (RT) is an essential part of the management of intracranial tumors and has been used in treating pituitary adenomas for more than five decades. It has been demonstrated that conventional RT for postoperative residual or progressive nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFAs) present an excellent long-term local tumor control, although its use has been limited because of the potential late toxicity related to radiation treatments. Recent advances in radiation techniques have led to more accurate treatments, rendering obsolete many commonly held views of the "old" radiotherapy. New techniques include intensity modulated radiotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and stereotactic techniques, either stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. New techniques allow the delivering of higher radiation doses to the target with rapid dose fall-off in the surrounding normal tissues, and potentially limiting the long term toxicity of radiation. In this review, we present a critical analysis of the most recent available literature on the use of radiation in patients with NFAs, focusing particularly on the efficacy and safety of radiation stereotactic techniques.

Updates in outcomes of stereotactic radiation therapy in acromegaly

Purpose Treatment of acromegaly has undergone important progress in the last 20 years mainly due to the development of new medical options and advances in surgical techniques. Pituitary surgery is usually first-line therapy, and medical treatment is indicated for persistent disease, while radiation (RT) is often used as third-line therapy. The benefits of RT (tumor volume control and decreased hormonal secretion) are hampered by the long latency of the effect and the high risk of adverse effects. Stereotactic RT methods have been developed with the aim to provide more precise targeting of the tumor with better control of the radiation dose received by the adjacent brain structures. The purpose of this review is to present the updates in the efficacy and safety of pituitary RT in acromegalic patients, with an emphasis on the new stereotactic radiation techniques. Methods A systematic review was performed using PubMed and articles/abstracts and reviews detailing RT in acromegaly from 2000 to 2016 were included. Results Stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic RT (FSRT) for patients with persistent active acromegaly after surgery and/or during medical therapy provide comparable high rates of tumor control, i.e. stable or decrease in size of the tumor in 93-100% of patients at 5-10 years and endocrinological remission in 40-60% of patients at 5 years. Hypofractionated RT is an optimal option for tumors located near the optic structures, due to its lower toxicity for the optic nerves compared to single-dose radiosurgery. The rate of new hypopituitarism varies from 10 to 50% at 5 years and increases with the duration of follow-up. The risk for other radiation-induced complications is usually low (0-5% for new visual deficits, cranial nerves damage or brain radionecrosis and 0-1% for secondary brain tumors) and risk of stroke may be higher in FSRT. Conclusion Although the use of radiotherapy in patients with acromegaly has decreased with advances in medical treatments, it remains an effective treatment option after unsuccessful surgery and/or resistance or unavailability of medical therapy. Long-term studies evaluating secondary morbidity and mortality rate after the new stereotactic techniques are needed, in order to evaluate their potential brain-sparing effect.

Safety and efficacy of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of pituitary adenomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Accumulated studies have not provided conclusive evidence in regards to the comparative efficacy and safety of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of pituitary adenomas. To address this issue, we performed a meta-analysis with eight studies identified from Medline, PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and published up to September 17, 2015. Eligible studies reported the disease control rate, endocrine cure rate (for functional adenomas), the rate of occurrence of new-onset hypopituitarism, and visual disturbance rate in patients treated with either stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Eight studies enrolled a total of 634 patients with pituitary adenoma, 273 patients underwent a stereotactic radiosurgery and 361 patients underwent fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. No significant differences were found in efficacy measures, such as disease control rate and endocrine cure rate, between stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (OR=1.156, p=0.666; OR=0.659, p=0.153, respectively). Additionally, meta-analysis of safety measures, such as the rate of new-onset hypopituitarism and visual disturbance rate, did not show significant differences between different treatments (OR=1.365, p=0.469; OR=0.872, p=0.845 respectively). In conclusion, both stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy have comparable efficacy and safety in the management of pituitary adenoma patients.

Target delineation and optimal radiosurgical dose for pituitary tumors

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) delivered as either single-fraction or multi-fraction SRS (2–5 fractions) is frequently employed in patients with residual or recurrent pituitary adenoma. The most common delivery systems used for SRS include the cobalt-60 system Gamma Knife, the CyberKnife (CK) robotic radiosurgery system, or a modified conventional radiotherapy machine (linear accelerator, LINAC). Tumor control and normalization of hormone hypersecretion have been reported in 75–100 % and 25–80 % of patients, respectively. Hypopituitarism is the most commonly reported late complication of radiation treatment, whereas other toxicities occur less frequently. We have provided an overview of the recent available literature on SRS in patients with a pituitary adenoma. Critical aspects of pituitary irradiation, including target delineation and doses to organs at risk, optimal radiation dose, as well as the long-term efficacy and toxicity of SRS for either nonfunctioning or secreting pituitary adenomas are discussed. Single-fraction SRS represents an effective treatment for patients with a pituitary adenoma; however, caution should be used for lesions > 2.5–3 cm in size and/or involving the anterior optic pathway. Future studies will be necessary to optimize target doses and critical organ dose constrains in order to reduce the long-term toxicity of treatments while maintaining high efficacy.

Monotherapy with lanreotide depot for acromegaly: long-term clinical experience in a pituitary center

PURPOSE

Long-acting somatostatin analogs are one of the main classes of medical therapy used for acromegaly and most patients require ongoing treatment. Few studies have evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of lanreotide depot beyond 2 years. The goal of this study was to provide a long-term longitudinal assessment of efficacy and safety of lanreotide depot in lanreotide responders compared to a surgically cured control group.

METHODS

In this retrospective longitudinal case-control study, patients with acromegaly receiving lanreotide depot monotherapy continuously for at least 24 months (N = 24) and surgically cured patients (N = 39) were compared. Serum IGF-1, pituitary MRIs, lanreotide dose, co-morbidities and adverse effects were assessed longitudinally.

RESULTS

In the lanreotide group, IGF-1 remained normal and unchanged over 6 years; comparable to the surgery only group. There was no difference in prevalence of normal IGF-1 between the lanreotide and surgery only groups at 6 months (100 vs. 97 %), 6 years (89 vs. 90 %) and at last follow-up (96 vs. 92 %). Tumor size remained stable (79 %) or decreased (21 %) in the lanreotide group. In the surgery only group, tumor size remained unchanged in all patients. Hemoglobin A1C did not differ between lanreotide and surgery only groups (baseline 5.8 vs. 6.1 %; last follow-up 6.0 vs. 5.7 %). Two (8 %) of the lanreotide and none of the surgery only group developed new diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION

Lanreotide depot maintains normalization of IGF-1 in 89 % of responders after 6 years, comparable to surgically cured controls, and controlled tumor size in all without significant adverse effects.

RADIOTHERAPY VERSUS RADIOSURGERY IN TREATING PATIENTS WITH ACROMEGALY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

OBJECTIVE

When patients with acromegaly have residual disease following surgery, adjuvant radiation therapy is considered. Both stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and conventional fractionated radiotherapy (RT) are utilized. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the existing evidence and compare outcomes for SRS and RT in patients with acromegaly.

METHODS

We searched Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus through April 2014 for studies in which SRS or RT were used in patients with acromegaly. Outcomes evaluated were serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and growth hormone (GH) levels, biochemical remission, all-cause mortality, hypopituitarism, headaches, and secondary malignancies. We pooled outcomes using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The final search yielded 30 eligible studies assessing 2,464 patients. Compared to RT, SRS was associated with a nonsignificant increase in remission rate at the latest follow-up period (52% vs. 36%; P = .14) and a significantly lower follow-up IGF-I level (-409.72 μg/L vs. -102 μg/L, P = .002). SRS had a lower incidence of hypopituitarism than RT; however, the difference was not statistically significant (32% vs. 51%, respectively; P = .05).

CONCLUSION

SRS may be associated with better biochemical remission, and it had a lower risk of hypopituitarism with at least 1 deficient axis when compared with RT; however, the confidence in such evidence is very low due to the noncomparative nature of the studies, high heterogeneity, and imprecision.

Diagnosis, treatment and clinical perspectives of acromegaly

Acromegaly is an insidious disease of the pituitary caused by a growth hormone-secreting adenoma. Generally, the diagnosis is made rather late in the course of the disease. Currently, acromegaly can be cured in about half of the patients with the disease by expert surgery. The remainder of non-surgically cured patients often can be effectively treated with somatostatin analogs; either with the new generation of dopaminergic drugs or with Pegvisomant, a GH-receptor blocking agent. However, at the time of diagnosis many patients suffer from serious comorbidities, including hypertension, heart disease, arthrosis, sleep apnea and diabetes mellitus. Recent reports have shown that mortality risk can be normalized. Nevertheless, all efforts should be undertaken to treat comorbidities. New strategies for surgery and medical treatment are discussed.

Radiotherapy vs. Radiosurgery in Treating Patients with Acromegaly: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

When patients with acromegaly have residual disease following surgery, adjuvant radiation therapy is considered. Both stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and conventional fractionated radiotherapy (RT) are utilized. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the existing evidence to compare outcomes with SRS and RT in patients with acromegaly.

METHODS

We searched Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus through April 2014 for studies in which SRS or RT were used in patients with acromegaly. Outcomes evaluated were serum IGF-1 and GH levels, biochemical remission, all-cause mortality, hypopituitarism, headaches and secondary malignancies. We pooled outcomes using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

The final search yielded 30 eligible studies enrolling 2464 patients. When compared to RT, SRS was associated with a non-significant increase in remission rate at the latest follow-up period (52% vs. 36%; p = 0.14), and a significantly lower follow-up IGF-1 level (decline of - 409.72 μg/1 vs. -102 μg/1; p = 0.002). SRS was associated with lower incidence of hypopituitarism than RT; however the difference was not statistically significant [(32% vs.51%, respectively; p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

SRS may be associated with better biochemical remission and lower risk of hypopituitarism with at least one deficient axis when compared with RT; however, the confidence in such evidence is very low due to the non-comparative nature of the studies, high heterogeneity, and imprecision.

Treatment of acromegaly patients with risk-adapted single or fractionated stereotactic high-precision radiotherapy: High local control and low toxicity in a pooled series

PURPOSE

The purpose of this work was to evaluate a prospectively initiated two-center protocol of risk-adapted stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with acromegaly.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total 35 patients (16 men/19 women, mean age 54 years) were prospectively included in a treatment protocol of SRS [planning target volume (PTV < 4 ccm, > 2 mm to optic pathways = low risk] or SRT (PTV ≥ 4 ccm, ≤ 2 mm to optic pathways = high risk). The mean tumor volume was 3.71 ccm (range: 0.11-22.10 ccm). Based on the protocol guidelines, 21 patients were treated with SRS and 12 patients with SRT, 2 patients received both consecutively.

RESULTS

The median follow-up (FU) reached 8 years with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 87.3% [confidence interval (CI): 70.8-95.6%] and 5-year local control rate of 97.1% (CI: 83.4-99.8%). Almost 80% (28/35) presented tumor shrinkage during FU. Endocrinological cure was achieved in 23% and IGF-1 normalization with reduced medication was achieved in 40% of all patients. An endocrinological response was generally achieved within the first 3 years, but endocrinological cure can require more than 8 years. A new adrenocorticotropic hypopituitarism occurred in 13 patients (46.4%). A new visual field disorder and a new oculomotor palsy occurred in 1 patient, respectively. Patients with occurrence of visual/neurological impairments had a longer FU (p = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

Our SRS/SRT protocol proved to be safe and successful in terms of tumor control and protection of the visual system. The timing and rate of endocrine improvements are difficult to predict. One has to accept an unavoidable rate of additional adrenocorticotropic hypopituitarism in the long term.

Stereotactic radiation therapy for skull base recurrences: Is a salvage approach still possible?

AIM

A literature review was performed to analyse the role of stereotactic radiotherapy given in a single shot or in a fractionated fashion for recurrent skull base tumours in order to ascertain if it can be a real salvage approach.

BACKGROUND

The management of recurrent skull base tumours can have a curative or palliative intent and mainly includes surgery and RT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One-thousand-ninety-one articles were found in the search databases and the most relevant of them were analysed and briefly described.

RESULTS

Data on recurrences of meningioma, pituitary adenoma, craniopharyngioma, chordoma and chondrosarcoma, vestibular schwannoma, glomus jugulare tumours, olfactory neuroblastoma and recurrences from head and neck tumours invading the base of skull are reported highlighting the most relevant results in terms of local control, survival, side effects and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, it emerges that SRS and FSRT are effective and safe radiation modalities of realize real salvage treatment for recurrent skull base tumours.

Outcomes of proton therapy for patients with functional pituitary adenomas

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

This study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of proton therapy for functional pituitary adenomas (FPAs).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We analyzed 165 patients with FPAs who were treated at a single institution with proton therapy between 1992 and 2012 and had at least 6 months of follow-up. All but 3 patients underwent prior resection, and 14 received prior photon irradiation. Proton stereotactic radiosurgery was used for 92% of patients, with a median dose of 20 Gy(RBE). The remainder received fractionated stereotactic proton therapy. Time to biochemical complete response (CR, defined as ≥ 3 months of normal laboratory values with no medical treatment), local control, and adverse effects are reported.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up time of 4.3 years (range, 0.5-20.6 years) for 144 evaluable patients, the actuarial 3-year CR rate and the median time to CR were 54% and 32 months among 74 patients with Cushing disease (CD), 63% and 27 months among 8 patients with Nelson syndrome (NS), 26% and 62 months among 50 patients with acromegaly, and 22% and 60 months among 9 patients with prolactinomas, respectively. One of 3 patients with thyroid stimulating hormone-secreting tumors achieved CR. Actuarial time to CR was significantly shorter for corticotroph FPAs (CD/NS) compared with other subtypes (P=.001). At a median imaging follow-up time of 43 months, tumor control was 98% among 140 patients. The actuarial 3-year and 5-year rates of development of new hypopituitarism were 45% and 62%, and the median time to deficiency was 40 months. Larger radiosurgery target volume as a continuous variable was a significant predictor of hypopituitarism (adjusted hazard ratio 1.3, P=.004). Four patients had new-onset postradiosurgery seizures suspected to be related to generously defined target volumes. There were no radiation-induced tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Proton irradiation is an effective treatment for FPAs, and hypopituitarism remains the primary adverse effect.

Radiation therapy in the management of pituitary adenomas

Radiation therapy in the form of fractionated treatment or radiosurgery has an important role in the management of pituitary adenomas. Radiation is a reliable way of gaining local control for radiographically progressing pituitary adenomas. For functioning adenomas that are biochemically recurrent or persistent, radiation therapy is less consistent in offering biochemical normalization and often requires a latency period of years or decades. The decision of when to use radiation therapy is a delicate balance between its benefits and late sequelae, especially in the context of benign disease. Recent technological advances in radiation oncology hold the potential to minimize dose to uninvolved normal tissue and therefore reduce the risk of toxicity.

Acromegaly: a single centre's experience of stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy for growth hormone secreting pituitary tumours with the linear accelerator

Primary treatment for growth-hormone secreting pituitary adenomas usually involves surgery, with treatment options for recurrent and persistent disease including repeat surgery, medication and radiation therapy. The majority of previously published series for radiation therapy in acromegaly in the past 20 years have been based on Gamma-Knife (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) surgery. To our knowledge, we present the largest series of linear accelerator-based treatment for this disease, with a review of 121 patients treated at our institution; since 1990, 86 patients underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), 10 patients underwent fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), and for the purposes of comparison we also reviewed 25 patients who underwent conventional radiotherapy prior to 1990. Tumour volume control in all three groups was excellent and consistent with previously reported literature - only three of 86 (4%) patients undergoing SRS had a documented increase in tumour size, and none of the patients undergoing FSRT had a documented increase in size following a median follow-up of 5.5 and 5.1 years for SRS and FSRT, respectively. Target growth hormone levels of <2.5 ng/mL were met by 12 of 86 (14%) of the SRS group, and by two of 10 (20%) in the FSRT group. Target insulin-like growth factor-1 levels of age and sex matched controls were achieved in 16 of 86 patients (18.6%) post-SRS and five of 10 patients (50%) post-FSRT. New hormonal deficits requiring replacement therapy were identified in 17 of 86 (19.8%) patients post-SRS which is consistent with previously published radiosurgical series. Identified non-hormonal morbidity was low (<5%).

Acromegaly: the disease, its impact on patients, and managing the burden of long-term treatment

Acromegaly is a rare disease most often caused by the prolonged secretion of excess growth hormone from a pituitary adenoma. The disease is associated with multiple significant comorbidities and increased mortality. The delay to diagnosis is often long. This may be because of low disease awareness among health care professionals, the insidious onset of differentiating features, and because patients are likely to present with complaints typical of other conditions more frequently seen in primary care. Early identification of acromegaly facilitates prompt treatment initiation and may minimize the permanent effects of excess growth hormone. The primary treatment for many patients will be pituitary surgery, although not all patients will be eligible for surgery or achieve a surgical cure. If biochemical control is not achieved following surgery, other treatment options include medical therapy and radiation therapy. Improved biochemical control may only alleviate rather than reverse the associated comorbidities. Thus, lifelong monitoring of patient health is needed, with particular attention to the management of cardiovascular risk factors. It is additionally important to consider the impact of both disease and treatment on patients’ quality of life and minimize that impact where possible, but particularly for chronic therapies. For the majority of patients, chronic therapy is likely to include somatostatin analog injections. In some circumstances, it may be possible to extend the dosing interval of the analog once good biochemical control is achieved. Additional convenience may be gained from the possibility of self-/partner administration of treatment or administration of treatment by a health care professional at home. Overall, it is clear that the care of patients with acromegaly requires a highly coordinated approach involving numerous specialties (eg, endocrinology, surgery, cardiology). Further, patients’ needs must be at the core of management and every effort must be made to improve health care experiences and minimize treatment burdens.

Radiosurgery with photons or protons for benign and malignant tumours of the skull base: a review

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an important treatment option for intracranial lesions. Many studies have shown the effectiveness of photon-SRS for the treatment of skull base (SB) tumours; however, limited data are available for proton-SRS.Several photon-SRS techniques, including Gamma Knife, modified linear accelerators (Linac) and CyberKnife, have been developed and several studies have compared treatment plan characteristics between protons and photons.The principles of classical radiobiology are similar for protons and photons even though they differ in terms of physical properties and interaction with matter resulting in different dose distributions.Protons have special characteristics that allow normal tissues to be spared better than with the use of photons, although their potential clinical superiority remains to be demonstrated.A critical analysis of the fundamental radiobiological principles, dosimetric characteristics, clinical results, and toxicity of proton- and photon-SRS for SB tumours is provided and discussed with an attempt of defining the advantages and limits of each radiosurgical technique.

Comprehensive review of stereotactic radiosurgery for medically and surgically refractory pituitary adenomas

Despite advances in surgical techniques and medical therapies, a significant proportion of pituitary adenomas remain endocrinologically active, demonstrate persistent radiographic disease, or recur when followed for long periods of time. While surgical intervention remains the first-line therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery is increasingly recognized as a viable treatment option for these often challenging tumors. In this review, we comprehensively review the literature to evaluate both endocrinologic and radiographic outcomes of radiosurgical management of pituitary adenomas. The literature clearly supports the use of radiosurgery, with endocrinologic remission rates and time to remission varying by tumor type [prolactinoma: 20–30%, growth hormone secreting adenomas: ~50%, adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH)-secreting adenomas: 40–65%] and radiographic control rates almost universally greater than 90% with long-term follow-up. We stratify the outcomes by tumor type, review the importance of prognostic factors (particularly, pre-treatment endocrinologic function and tumor size), and discuss the complications of treatment (with special attention to endocrinopathy and visual complications). We conclude that the literature supports the use of radiosurgery for treatment-refractory pituitary adenomas, providing the patient with a minimally invasive, safe, and effective treatment option for an otherwise resistant tumor. As such, we provide literature-based treatment considerations, including radiosurgical dose, endocrinologic, radiographic, and medical considerations for each adenoma type.

Stereotactic Irradiation of GH-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas

Radiotherapy (RT) is often employed in patients with acromegaly refractory to medical and/or surgical interventions in order to prevent tumour regrowth and normalize elevated GH and IGF-I levels. It achieves tumour control and hormone normalization up to 90% and 70% of patients at 10-15 years. Despite the excellent tumour control, conventional RT is associated with a potential risk of developing late toxicity, especially hypopituitarism, and its role in the management of patients with GH-secreting pituitary adenomas remains a matter of debate. Stereotactic techniques have been developed with the aim to deliver more localized irradiation and minimize the long-term consequences of treatment, while improving its efficacy. Stereotactic irradiation can be given in a single dose as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or in multiple doses as fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). We have reviewed the recent published literature on stereotactic techniques for GH-secreting pituitary tumors with the aim to define the efficacy and potential adverse effects of each of these techniques.

Surgery and radiosurgery for acromegaly: a review of indications, operative techniques, outcomes, and complications

Among multimodality treatments for acromegaly, the goals of surgical intervention are to balance maximal tumor resection while preserving normal pituitary function and maintaining patient safety. The resection of growth hormone-(GH-) secreting pituitary adenomas in the hands of experienced surgeons results in hormonal remission in 50-70% of patients. Acromegalic patients often have medical comorbidities and anatomical variations complicating anesthesia and surgical management. Despite these challenges, complications such as CSF leak or new hypopituitarism following surgery remain uncommon. Over the past decade, endoscopic approaches to pituitary tumors have improved visualization and facilitated identification of additional tumor using angled telescopes. Patients with persistent acromegaly following surgery require continued medical and/or radiation-based interventions. The adjunctive use of stereotactic radiosurgery offers hormonal remission in 40-50% of patients. In this article, the current preoperative evaluation, indications for surgery, surgical approaches, role of radiosurgery, complications, and remission criteria following operative resection of GH adenomas are reviewed.

Radiation techniques for acromegaly

Radiotherapy (RT) remains an effective treatment in patients with acromegaly refractory to medical and/or surgical interventions, with durable tumor control and biochemical remission; however, there are still concerns about delayed biochemical effect and potential late toxicity of radiation treatment, especially high rates of hypopituitarism. Stereotactic radiotherapy has been developed as a more accurate technique of irradiation with more precise tumour localization and consequently a reduction in the volume of normal tissue, particularly the brain, irradiated to high radiation doses. Radiation can be delivered in a single fraction by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or as fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) in which smaller doses are delivered over 5-6 weeks in 25-30 treatments. A review of the recent literature suggests that pituitary irradiation is an effective treatment for acromegaly. Stereotactic techniques for GH-secreting pituitary tumors are discussed with the aim to define the efficacy and potential adverse effects of each of these techniques.

Radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas: long-term outcome and complications

PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term local control rate and toxicity in patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for pituitary adenomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 60 patients treated with EBRT for pituitary adenoma at Korea University Medical Center from 1996 and 2006. Thirty-five patients had hormone secreting tumors, 25 patients had non-secreting tumors. Fifty-seven patients had received postoperative radiotherapy (RT), and 3 had received RT alone. Median total dose was 54 Gy (range, 36 to 61.2 Gy). The definition of tumor progression were as follows: evidence of tumor progression on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, worsening of clinical sign requiring additional operation or others, rising serum hormone level against a previously stable or falling value, and failure of controlling serum hormone level so that the hormone level had been far from optimal range until last follow-up. Age, sex, hormone secretion, tumor extension, tumor size, and radiation dose were analyzed for prognostic significance in tumor control.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 5.7 years (range, 2 to 14.4 years). The 10-year actuarial local control rates for non-secreting and secreting adenomas were 96% and 66%, respectively. In univariate analysis, hormone secretion was significant prognostic factor (p = 0.042) and cavernous sinus extension was marginally significant factor (p = 0.054) for adverse local control. All other factors were not significant. In multivariate analysis, hormone secretion and gender were significant. Fifty-three patients had mass-effect symptoms (headache, dizziness, visual disturbance, hypopituitarism, loss of consciousness, and cranial nerve palsy). A total of 17 of 23 patients with headache and 27 of 34 patients with visual impairment were improved. Twenty-seven patients experienced symptoms of endocrine hypersecretion (galactorrhea, amenorrhea, irregular menstruation, decreased libido, gynecomastia, acromegaly, and Cushing's disease). Amenorrhea was abated in 7 of 10 patients, galactorrhea in 8 of 8 patients, acromegaly in 7 of 11 patients, Cushing's disease in 4 of 4 patients. Long-term complication was observed in 4 patients; 3 patients with cerebrovascular accident, 1 patient developed dementia. Of these patients, 3 of 4 received more than 60 Gy of irradiation.

CONCLUSION

EBRT is highly effective in preventing recurrence and reducing mass effect of non-secreting adenoma. Effort to improve tumor control of secreting adenoma is required. Careful long-term follow-up is required when relatively high dose is applied. Modern radiosurgery or proton RT may be options to decrease late complications.

Radiation treatment strategies for acromegaly

The high morbidity and mortality associated with acromegaly can be addressed with multiple treatment modalities, including surgery, medicines, and radiation therapy. Radiation was initially delivered through conventional fractionated radiotherapy, which targets a wide area over many treatment sessions and has been shown to induce remission in 50%&#x2013;60% of patients with acromegaly. However, conventional fractionated radiotherapy takes several years to achieve remission in patients with acromegaly and carries a risk of hypopituitarism that may limit its use. Stereotactic radiosurgery, of which there are several forms, including Gamma Knife surgery, CyberKnife therapy, and proton beam therapy, offers slightly attenuated efficacy but achieves remission in less time and provides more precise targeting of the adenoma with better control of the dose of radiation received by adjacent structures such as the pituitary stalk, pituitary gland, optic chiasm, and cranial nerves in the cavernous sinus. Of the forms of stereotactic radiosurgery, Gamma Knife surgery is the most widely used and, because of its long-term follow-up in clinical studies, is the most likely to compete with medical therapy for first-line adjuvant use after resection. In this review, the authors outline the major modes of radiation therapies in clinical use today, and they critically assess the feasibility of these modalities for acromegaly treatment. Acromegaly is a multisystem disorder that demands highly specialized treatment protocols including neurosurgical and endocrinological intervention. As more efficient forms of pituitary radiation develop, acromegaly treatment options may continue to change with radiation therapies playing a more prominent role.

[Treatment of acromegaly]

Growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion leads to acromegaly which is associated with several co-morbidities and increased mortality. Despite of the typical clinical features and modern diagnostic tools, it often takes years from the onset of the disease until the diagnosis. The aims of the treatment are to reduce or control the tumor growth, inhibit the GH hypersecretion, normalize the insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels, treat the co-morbidities and therefore reduce mortality. There are three approaches for therapy: surgery, medical management (dopamine agonist, somatostatin analogues and GH receptor antagonist), and radiotherapy. Efficient therapy of the disease is based on the appropriate multidisciplinary team management.

Prolactinomas, Cushing's disease and acromegaly: debating the role of medical therapy for secretory pituitary adenomas

Pituitary adenomas are associated with a variety of clinical manifestations resulting from excessive hormone secretion and tumor mass effects, and require a multidisciplinary management approach. This article discusses the treatment modalities for the management of patients with a prolactinoma, Cushing's disease and acromegaly, and summarizes the options for medical therapy in these patients.First-line treatment of prolactinomas is pharmacotherapy with dopamine agonists; recent reports of cardiac valve abnormalities associated with this class of medication in Parkinson's disease has prompted study in hyperprolactinemic populations. Patients with resistance to dopamine agonists may require other treatment.First-line treatment of Cushing's disease is pituitary surgery by a surgeon with experience in this condition. Current medical options for Cushing's disease block adrenal cortisol production, but do not treat the underlying disease. Pituitary-directed medical therapies are now being explored. In several small studies, the dopamine agonist cabergoline normalized urinary free cortisol in some patients. The multi-receptor targeted somatostatin analogue pasireotide (SOM230) shows promise as a pituitary-directed medical therapy in Cushing's disease; further studies will determine its efficacy and safety. Radiation therapy, with medical adrenal blockade while awaiting the effects of radiation, and bilateral adrenalectomy remain standard treatment options for patients not cured with pituitary surgery.In patients with acromegaly, surgery remains the first-line treatment option when the tumor is likely to be completely resected, or for debulking, especially when the tumor is compressing neurovisual structures. Primary therapy with somatostatin analogues has been used in some patients with large extrasellar tumors not amenable to surgical cure, patients at high surgical risk and patients who decline surgery. Pegvisomant is indicated in patients who have not responded to surgery and other medical therapy, although there are regional differences in when it is prescribed.In conclusion, the treatment of patients with pituitary adenomas requires a multidisciplinary approach. Dopamine agonists are an effective first-line medical therapy in most patients with a prolactinoma, and somatostatin analogues can be used as first-line therapy in selected patients with acromegaly. Current medical therapies for Cushing's disease primarily focus on adrenal blockade of cortisol production, although pasireotide and cabergoline show promise as pituitary-directed medical therapy for Cushing's disease; further long-term evaluation of efficacy and safety is important.

[Is proton beam therapy the future of radiotherapy? Part I: clinical aspects]

Proton beam therapy uses positively charged particles, protons, whose physical properties improve dose-distribution (Bragg peak characterized by a sharp distal and lateral penumbra) compared with conventional photon-based radiation therapy (X-ray). These ballistic advantages apply to the treatment of deep-sited tumours located close to critical structures and requiring high-dose levels. [60-250 MeV] proton-beam therapy is now widely accepted as the "gold standard" in specific indications in adults--ocular melanoma, chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the base of skull --and is regarded as a highly promising treatment modality in the treatment of paediatric malignancies (brain tumours, sarcomas…). This includes the relative sparing of surrounding normal organs from low and mid-doses that can cause deleterious side-effects such as radiation-induced secondary malignancies. Other clinical studies are currently testing proton beam in dose-escalation evaluations, in prostate, lung, hepatocellular cancers, etc. Clinical validation of these new indications appears necessary. To date, over 60,000 patients worldwide have received part or all of their radiation therapy program by proton beams, in approximately 30 treatment facilities.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with acromegaly: an interim single-centre audit

AIM

To evaluate the effect of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) in acromegaly in a retrospective analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients (17 females, median 43 years (range 30-74)) with acromegaly were treated with FSRT (conformal dynamic arcing, dose 54 Gy, 27-30 fractions) between January 1998 and April 2007. Of the 34 patients, 32 had undergone transsphenoidal adenotomy, and 28 were on medical therapy before FSRT. Patients on medical therapy continued this during and after the irradiation. The treatment was gradually decreased/withdrawn after careful assessment.

RESULTS

Magnetic resonance scanning of the pituitary gland 34 months (median, range 11-95) after irradiation showed stable or reduced volume of the remaining tumour tissue in 31 of 34 patients (91%). Seventeen patients (50%) were biochemically controlled (normalised nadir GH during oral glucose tolerance test and IGF1 <+2 S.D.) 30 months after FSRT (median, range 6-60), and ten of them had true biochemical remission (off medical therapy) 30 months after FSRT (median, range 12-69). Of 28 patients with one or more functioning pituitary axes before irradiation, 8 (29%) developed further deficit of one or two pituitary axes 48 months (median, range 6-102) after FSRT. Of 34 patients, 20 still required medical treatment for acromegaly at the end of this study, mainly those with a short follow-up period after irradiation.

CONCLUSION

The FSRT seems promising in terms of treatment of acromegaly. Longer follow-up is, however, needed to assess the overall efficacy and safety of FSRT for acromegaly.

Role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of pituitary adenomas

Trans-sphenoidal neurosurgery is the gold standard treatment for pituitary adenomas, but it can be contraindicated or ineffective. Stereotactic radiosurgery is a procedure aimed at controlling hormone hypersecretion and tumor size of pituitary adenomas. This Review discusses the long-term efficacy and adverse effects of stereotactic radiosurgery with the Gamma Knife((R)) in secreting and nonsecreting pituitary adenomas. Long-term data confirm the antisecretory efficacy of the procedure (about 50% remission in hypersecreting tumors) but also a previously unknown low risk of recurrence (2-10% of cases). The time to remission is estimated to range from 12 to 60 months. The antitumoral efficacy of this treatment against nonsecreting tumors is observed in about 90% of cases. Hypopituitarism is the main adverse effect, observed in 20-40% of cases. Comparisons with conventional fractionated radiotherapy reveal a lower rate of remission with Gamma Knife((R)) radiosurgery, counterbalanced by a more rapid efficacy and a lower rate of hypopituitarism. Short-term follow-up results on stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy suggest a risk of hypopituitarism similar to the one observed with radiosurgery. Therefore, stereotactic radiosurgery is probably still useful to treat some cases of pituitary adenoma, despite the fact that antisecretory drugs, particularly for acromegaly and prolactinomas, are becoming more effective and are well tolerated, thus increasing the probability of success with nonsurgical therapy.

Comparison of pegvisomant and long-acting octreotide in patients with acromegaly naïve to radiation and medical therapy

BACKGROUND

Normalization of IGF-I in patients with acromegaly is associated with a decrease in mortality. Pegvisomant may be more effective in lowering IGF-I than octreotide.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The efficacy and safety of pegvisomant and octreotide long-acting release (LAR) were compared in 118 patients with acromegaly in this 52-week, multicenter, open-label, randomized study. The primary endpoint was IGF-I normalization at week 52. Secondary endpoints included mean changes from baseline in IGF-I, IGF binding protein 3, acromegaly signs and symptom scores, ring size, acromegaly quality of life questionnaire scores, and safety.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients received pegvisomant and 57 received octreotide LAR. IGF-I normalized in 51% of pegvisomant patients and 34% treated with octreotide LAR (p=0.09, ns). Patients with baseline IGF-I > or = 2x upper limit of normal had a higher rate of IGF-I normalization with pegvisomant vs octreotide LAR (p=0.05). Among the patients who did not achieve a normalized IGF-I, pegvisomant-treated patients were more likely to be receiving < 30 mg of study drug (71% vs 16%). Treatment-related adverse events were mild-to-moderate in both groups. Mean fasting glucose decreased in diabetic and non-diabetic patients on pegvisomant whereas octreotide LAR was associated with an increase at week 52 (p=0.005 and p=0.003 between groups, respectively). Mean change in tumor volume during treatment was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pegvisomant and octreotide LAR were equally effective in normalizing IGF-I in the overall population, and pegvisomant was more effective in patients with higher baseline IGF-I levels. Pegvisomant had a more favorable effect on parameters of glycemic control.

Recent advances in the treatment of acromegaly

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Description of recent outcomes and approaches to the treatment of patients with de-novo and recurrent acromegaly.

RECENT FINDINGS

Radiosurgery for acromegaly results in a higher likelihood of remission and an earlier time to remission than does conventional radiotherapy. Somatostatin analogs results in control of acromegaly and one half of patients. Combining treatment with pegvisomant and somatostatin analogs results in overall improved quality of life.

SUMMARY

Existing treatments offer patients and their treating physicians opportunities to restore life expectancy to normal and reverse many of the symptoms and signs of acromegaly.