Scientific Rigor Recommendations for Optimizing the Clinical Applicability of Translational Research

Uric Acid: A Translational Journey in Cerebroprotection That Spanned Preclinical and Human Data

Uric acid (UA) is a strong endogenous antioxidant that neutralizes the toxicity of peroxynitrite and other reactive species on the neurovascular unit generated during and after acute brain ischemia. The realization that a rapid reduction of UA levels during an acute ischemic stroke was associated with a worse stroke outcome paved the way to investigate the value of exogenous UA supplementation to counteract the progression of redox-mediated ischemic brain damage. The long translational journey for UA supplementation recently reached a critical milestone when the results of the multicenter NIH stroke preclinical assessment network (SPAN) were reported. In a novel preclinical paradigm, 6 treatment candidates including UA supplementation were selected and tested in 6 independent laboratories following predefined criteria and strict methodological rigor. UA supplementation was the only intervention in SPAN that exceeded the prespecified efficacy boundary with male and female animals, young mice, young rats, aging mice, obese mice, and spontaneously hypertensive rats. This unprecedented achievement will allow UA to undergo clinical testing in a pivotal clinical trial through a NIH StrokeNet thrombectomy endovascular platform created to assess new treatment strategies in patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy. UA is a particularly appealing adjuvant intervention for mechanical thrombectomy because it targets the microcirculatory hypoperfusion and oxidative stress that limits the efficacy of this therapy. This descriptive review aims to summarize the translational development of UA supplementation, highlighting those aspects that likely contributed to its success. It includes having a well-defined target and mechanism of action, and an approach that simultaneously integrated rigorous preclinical assessment, with epidemiologic and preliminary human intervention studies. Validation of the clinical value of UA supplementation in a pivotal trial would confirm the translational value of the SPAN paradigm in preclinical research.

Differences in Sociodemographic and Alcohol-Related Clinical Characteristics Between Treatment Seekers and Nontreatment Seekers and Their Role in Predicting Outcomes in the COMBINE Study for Alcohol Use Disorder

BACKGROUND

One of the challenges in early-stage clinical research aimed at developing novel treatments for alcohol use disorder (AUD) is that the enrolled participants are heavy drinkers, but do not seek treatment for AUD.

AIMS

To compare nontreatment seekers with alcohol dependence (AD) from 4 human laboratory studies conducted at Brown University (N = 240; 65.4% male) to treatment seekers with AD from the multisite COMBINE study (N = 1,383; 69.1% male) across sociodemographic and alcohol-related clinical variables and to evaluate whether the variables that significantly differentiate the 2 samples predict the 3 main COMBINE clinical outcomes: time to relapse, percent days abstinent (PDA), and good clinical outcome.

METHODS

Sample characteristics were assessed by parametric and nonparametric testing. Three regression models measured the association between the differing variables and the 3 main COMBINE clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The nontreatment seekers, compared to the treatment seekers, were more ethnically diverse, less educated, single, and working part-time or unemployed (p's < 0.05); they met fewer DSM-IV AD criteria and had significantly lower scores on alcohol-related scales (p's < 0.05); they were less likely to have a father with alcohol problems (p < 0.0001) and had a significantly earlier age of onset and longer duration of AD (p's < 0.05); they also had significantly more total drinks, drinks per drinking day, heavy drinking days (HDD), and lower PDA in the 30 days prior to baseline (p's < 0.0001 to <0.05). Having more HDD in the 30 days prior to baseline predicted all of the 3 COMBINE clinical outcomes. All the other characteristics mentioned above that differed significantly between the 2 groups predicted at least 1 of the 3 COMBINE clinical outcomes, except for level of education, age of onset, and duration of AD.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed differences between groups should be considered in efforts across participant recruitment at different stages of the development of new treatments for AUD.

Low-Frequency Vibrations Enhance Thrombolytic Therapy and Improve Stroke Outcomes

Background and Purpose- We aim to determine the potential impact on stroke thrombolysis of drip-and-ship helicopter flights and specifically of their low-frequency vibrations (LFVs). Methods- Mice with a middle cerebral artery autologous thromboembolic occlusion were randomized to receive rtPA (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator; or saline) 90 minutes later in 3 different settings: (1) a motion platform simulator that reproduced the LFV signature of the helicopter, (2) a standardized actual helicopter flight, and (3) a ground control. Results- Mice assigned to the LFV simulation while receiving tPA had smaller infarctions (31.6 versus 54.9 mm3; P=0.007) and increased favorable neurological outcomes (86% versus 28%; P=0.0001) when compared with ground controls. Surprisingly, mice receiving tPA in the helicopter did not exhibit smaller infarctions (47.8 versus 54.9 mm3; P=0.58) nor improved neurological outcomes (37% versus 28%; P=0.71). This could be due to a causative effect of the 20- to 30-Hz band, which was inadvertently attenuated during actual flights. Mice using saline showed no differences between the LFV simulator and controls with respect to infarct size (80.9 versus 95.3; P=0.81) or neurological outcomes (25% versus 11%; P=0.24), ruling out an effect of LFV alone. There were no differences in blood-brain barrier permeability between LFV simulator or helicopter, compared with controls (2.45-3.02 versus 4.82 mm3; P=0.14). Conclusions- Vibration in the low-frequency range (0.5-120 Hz) is synergistic with rtPA, significantly improving the effectiveness of thrombolysis without impairing blood-brain barrier permeability. Our findings reveal LFV as a novel, safe, and simple-to-deliver intervention that could improve the outcomes of patients. Visual Overview- An online visual overview is available for this article.

Dose-response, therapeutic time-window and tPA-combinatorial efficacy of compound 21: A randomized, blinded preclinical trial in a rat model of thromboembolic stroke

The aim of this translational, randomized, controlled, blinded preclinical trial was to determine the effect of compound 21 (C21) in embolic stroke. Rats were subjected to embolic-middle cerebral artery occlusion (eMCAO). They received C21 (0.01, 0.03 and 0.06 mg/kg/d) or saline (orally) for five days, with the first-dose given IV at 3 h post-eMCAO. For the time-window study, the optimal-dose of C21 was initiated at 3, 6 or 24 h post-eMCAO and continued for five days. For the combinatorial study, animals received IV-tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) at either 2 or 4 h, with IV-C21 (0.01 mg/kg) or saline at 3 h post-eMCAO and daily thereafter for five days. After performing the behavior tests, brains were collected for analyses. The dose-response study showed significant motor improvements with the lowest-dose (0.01 mg/kg) of C21. In the time-window study, this same dose resulted in improvements when given 6 h and 24 h post-eMCAO. Moreover, C21-treated animals performed better on the novel object recognition test. Neither the single treatment with C21 or tPA (4 h) nor the combination therapy was effective in reducing the hemorrhage or infarct size, although C21 alone lowered sensorimotor deficit scores post-eMCAO. Future studies should focus on the long-term cognitive benefits of C21, rather than acute neuroprotection.

Methodological standards, quality of reporting and regulatory compliance in animal research on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review

Objectives

The amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) research community was one of the first to adopt methodology guidelines to improve preclinical research reproducibility. We here present the results of a systematic review to investigate how the standards in this field changed over the 10-year period during which the guidelines were first published (2007) and updated (2010).

Methods

We searched for papers reporting ALS research on SOD1 (superoxide dismutase 1) mice published between 2005 and 2015 on the ISI Web of Science database, resulting in a sample of 569 papers to review, after triage. Two scores-one for methodological quality, one for regulatory compliance-were built from weighted sums of separate sets of items, and subjected to multivariable regression analysis, to assess how these related to publication year, type of study, country of origin and journal.

Results

Reporting standards improved over time. Of papers published after the first ALS guidelines were made public, fewer than 9% referred specifically to these. Of key research parameters, only three (genetic background, number of transgenes and group size) were reported in >50% of the papers. Information on housing conditions, randomisation and blinding was absent in over two-thirds of the papers. Group size was among the best reported parameters, but the majority reported using fewer than the recommended sample size and only two studies clearly justified group size.

Conclusions

General methodological standards improved gradually over a period of 8-10 years, but remained generally comparable with related fields with no specific guidelines, except with regard to severity. Only 11% of ALS studies were classified in the highest severity level (animals allowed to reach death or moribund stages), substantially below the proportion in studies of comparable neurodegenerative diseases such as Huntington's. The existence of field-specific guidelines, although a welcome indication of concern, seems insufficient to ensure adherence to high methodological standards. Other mechanisms may be required to improve methodological and welfare standards.

Amygdala and Hypothalamus: Historical Overview With Focus on Aggression

Aggressiveness has a high prevalence in psychiatric patients and is a major health problem. Two brain areas involved in the neural network of aggressive behavior are the amygdala and the hypothalamus. While pharmacological treatments are effective in most patients, some do not properly respond to conventional therapies and are considered medically refractory. In this population, surgical procedures (ie, stereotactic lesions and deep brain stimulation) have been performed in an attempt to improve symptomatology and quality of life. Clinical results obtained after surgery are difficult to interpret, and the mechanisms responsible for postoperative reductions in aggressive behavior are unknown. We review the rationale and neurobiological characteristics that may help to explain why functional neurosurgery has been proposed to control aggressive behavior.

A companion to the preclinical common data elements and case report forms for rodent EEG studies. A report of the TASK3 EEG Working Group of the ILAE/AES Joint Translational Task Force

Electroencephalography (EEG) is commonly used in epilepsy and neuroscience research to study brain activity. The principles of EEG recording such as signal acquisition, digitization, and conditioning share similarities between animal and clinical EEG systems. In contrast, preclinical EEG studies demonstrate more variability and diversity than clinical studies in the types and locations of EEG electrodes, methods of data analysis, and scoring of EEG patterns and associated behaviors. The TASK3 EEG working group of the International League Against Epilepsy/American Epilepsy Society (ILAE/AES) Joint Translational Task Force has developed a set of preclinical common data elements (CDEs) and case report forms (CRFs) for recording, analysis, and scoring of animal EEG studies. This companion document accompanies the first set of proposed preclinical EEG CRFs and is intended to clarify the CDEs included in these worksheets. We provide 7 CRF and accompanying CDE modules for use by the research community, covering video acquisition, electrode information, experimental scheduling, and scoring of EEG activity. For ease of use, all data elements and input ranges are defined in supporting Excel charts (Appendix S1).

Preclinical Efficacy Failure of Human CNS-Derived Stem Cells for Use in the Pathway Study of Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

We previously showed the efficacy of multiple research cell lines (RCLs) of human CNS neural stem cells (HuCNS-SCs) in mouse and rat models of thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI), supporting a thoracic SCI clinical trial. Experts recommend in vivo preclinical testing of the intended clinical cell lot/line (CCL) in models with validity for the planned clinical target. We therefore tested the efficacy of two HuCNS-SC lines in cervical SCI: one RCL, and one CCL intended for use in the Pathway Study of cervical SCI in man. We assessed locomotor recovery and sensory function, as well as engraftment, migration, and fate. No evidence of efficacy of the CCL was observed; some data suggested a negative impact of the CCL on outcomes. These data raise questions about the development and validation of potency/comparability assays for clinical testing of cell products, and lack of US Food and Drug Administration requirements for in vivo testing of intended clinical cell lines.

•

Human CNS stem cells (HuCNS-SCs) have been used in multiple clinical trials

•

Research cell lines of HuCNS-SCs are efficacious in spinal cord injury (SCI) models

•

The clinical cell line (CCL) of HuCNS-SC was not efficacious in a cervical SCI model

•

Despite lack of in vivo efficacy, the CCL was used in the Pathways clinical study

Data Standardization and Quality Management

Important questions regarding the conduct of scientific research and data transparency have been raised in various scientific forums over the last 10 years. It is becoming clear, that in spite of published RIGOR guidelines, that improvement in the transparency of scientific research is required to focus on the discovery and drug development process so that a treatment can be provided to stroke patients. We have the unique privilege of conducting research using animal models of a disease so that we can address the development of a new therapy, and we should do this with great care and vigilance. This document identifies valuable resources for researchers to become Good Laboratory Practices compliant and increase and improve data transparency and provides guidelines for accurate data management to continue to propel the translational stroke research field forward while recognizing that there is a shortage of research funds worldwide. While data audits are being considered worldwide by funding agencies and they are used extensively by industry, they are still quite controversial for basic researchers. Due to the special exploratory nature of basic and translational science research, the current challenging funding environment, and independent and individualized laboratory activities, it is debatable if current individualized non-standardized data management and monitoring represents the best approach. Thus, herein, we propose steps to prepare research study data in an acceptable form for archival purposes so that standards for translational research data can be comparable to those that are accepted and adhered to by the clinical community. If all translational research laboratories follow and institute the guidelines while conducting translational research, data from all sources may be more comparable and reliable.

Impact of Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) Guidelines on Peri-Anesthesia Care for Rat Models of Stroke: A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Years 2005 and 2015

Numerous studies using rats in stroke models have failed to translate into successful clinical trials in humans. The Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) has produced guidelines on the rodent stroke model for preclinical trials in order to promote the successful translation of animal to human studies. These guidelines also underline the importance of anaesthetic and monitoring techniques. The aim of this literature review is to document whether anaesthesia protocols (i.e., choice of agents, mode of ventilation, physiological support and monitoring) have been amended since the publication of the STAIR guidelines in 2009. A number of articles describing the use of a stroke model in adult rats from the years 2005 and 2015 were randomly selected from the PubMed database and analysed for the following parameters: country where the study was performed, strain of rats used, technique of stroke induction, anaesthetic agent for induction and maintenance, mode of intubation and ventilation, monitoring techniques, control of body temperature, vascular accesses, and administration of intravenous fluids and analgesics. For each parameter (stroke, induction, maintenance, monitoring), exact chi-square tests were used to determine whether or not proportions were significantly different across year and p values were corrected for multiple comparisons. An exact p-test was used for each parameter to compare the frequency distribution of each value followed by a Bonferroni test. The level of significant set at < 0.05. Results show that there were very few differences in the anaesthetic and monitoring techniques used between 2005 and 2015. In 2015, significantly more studies were performed in China and significantly fewer studies used isoflurane and nitrous oxide. The most striking finding is that the vast majority of all the studies from both 2005 and 2015 did not report the use of ventilation; measurement of blood gases, end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration, or blood pressure; or administration of intravenous fluids or analgesics. The review of articles published in 2015 showed that the STAIR guidelines appear to have had no effect on the anaesthetic and monitoring techniques in rats undergoing experimental stroke induction, despite the publication of said guidelines in 2009.

The High Cost of Stroke and Stroke Cytoprotection Research

Acute ischemic stroke is inadequately treated in the USA and worldwide due to a lengthy history of neuroprotective drug failures in clinical trials. The majority of victims must endure life-long disabilities that not only affect their livelihood, but also have an enormous societal economic impact. The rapid development of a neuroprotective or cytoprotective compound would allow future stroke victims to receive a treatment to reduce disabilities and further promote recovery of function. This opinion article reviews in detail the enormous costs associated with developing a small molecule to treat stroke, as well as providing a timely overview of the cell-death time-course and relationship to the ischemic cascade. Distinct temporal patterns of cell-death of neurovascular unit components provide opportunities to intervene and optimize new cytoprotective strategies. However, adequate research funding is mandatory to allow stroke researchers to develop and test their novel therapeutic approach to treat stroke victims.

Nonhuman primate model in clinical modeling of diseases for stem cell therapy

Nonhuman primates (NHPs) are alike humans in size, behavior, physiology, biochemistry, and immunology. Given close similarities to humans, the NHP model offers exceptional opportunities to understand the biological mechanisms and translational applications with direct relevance to human conditions. Here, we evaluate the opportunities and limitations of NHPs as animal models for translational regenerative medicine. NHP models of human disease propose exceptional opportunities to advance stem cell-based therapy by addressing pertinent translational concerns related to this research. Nonetheless, the value of these primates must be carefully assessed, taking into account the expense of specialized equipment and requirement of highly specialized staff. Well-designed initial fundamental studies in small animal models are essential before translating research into NHP models and eventually into human trials. In addition, we suggest that applying a directed and collaborative approach, as seen in the evolution of stroke NHP models, will greatly benefit the translation of stem cell therapy in other NHP disease models.

Effect of the Pleiotropic Drug CNB-001 on Tissue Plasminogen Activator (tPA) Protease Activity in vitro: Support for Combination Therapy to Treat Acute Ischemic Stroke

Current state-of-the-art acute ischemic stroke clinical trials are designed to study neuroprotectants when administered following thrombolysis; tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is administered to patients within 3-4.5 hours of an ischemic event. Thus, in order to develop a novel neuroprotectant and move it forward to a clinical trial, it is important to assess the effects of the drug on tPA's proteolytic activity in vitro, prior to extensive in vivo analysis. In this study, we determined if CNB-001 [4-((1E)-2-(5-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxystyryl-)-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazoyl-3-yl)vinyl)-2-methoxy-phenol)], would affect, either enhance or inhibit tPA activity in vitro. In this tPA-inhibitor (plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; PAI-1 and 2,7-Bis-(4-Amidinobenzylidene)-Cycloheptan-1-One Dihydrochloride; tPA stop) controlled study, we used a chromogenic substrate (CH3SO2-D-hexahydrotyrosine-Gly-Arg-p-nitroanilide•AcOH) to study drug interactions in vitro, spectrophotometrically measuring protease released p-Nitroaniline from the substrate. We found that PAI-1 (0.25 μM) and tPA stop (5 μM) significantly (p<0.0001) inhibited substrate release, by 98.6% and 83.4%, respectively, thus inhibiting tPA activity in vitro. In comparison, CNB-001 (0.7-7 μM) reduced tPA activity by 28-32%, with an extrapolated IC50 value of 65.2-704 μM. Thus, although high concentrations of CNB-001 does affects tPA activity in vitro, the study supports the use of CNB-001 in combination with tPA to treat stroke, However, CNB-001 should be administered following thrombolysis to promote neuroprotection and repair.

In vivo animal stroke models: a rationale for rodent and non-human primate models

On average, every four minutes an individual dies from a stroke, accounting for 1 out of every 18 deaths in the United States. Approximately 795,000 Americans have a new or recurrent stroke each year, with just over 600,000 of these being first attack [1]. There have been multiple animal models of stroke demonstrating that novel therapeutics can help improve the clinical outcome. However, these results have failed to show the same outcomes when tested in human clinical trials. This review will discuss the current in vivo animal models of stroke, advantages and limitations, and the rationale for employing these animal models to satisfy translational gating items for examination of neuroprotective, as well as neurorestorative strategies in stroke patients. An emphasis in the present discussion of therapeutics development is given to stem cell therapy for stroke.

J-147 a Novel Hydrazide Lead Compound to Treat Neurodegeneration: CeeTox™ Safety and Genotoxicity Analysis

J-147 is a broad spectrum neuroprotective phenyl hydrazide compound with significant neurotrophic properties related to the induction of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Because this molecule is pleiotropic, it may have substantial utility in the treatment of a wide range of neurodegenerative diseases including acute ischemic stroke (AIS), traumatic brain injury(TBI), and Alzheimer’s disease(AD) where both neuroprotection and neurotrophism would be beneficial. Because of the pleiotropic actions of J-147, we sought to determine the safety profile of the drug using multiple assay analysis.

For CeeTox analyses, we used a rat hepatoma cell line (H4IIE) resulted in estimated C_Tox value (i.e.: sustained concentration expected to produce toxicity in a 14 day repeat dosing study) of 90 μM for J-147. The CeeTox panel shows that J-147 produced some adverse effects on cellular activities, in particular mitochondrial function, but only with high concentrations of the drug. J-147 was also not genetoxic with or without Aroclor-1254 treatment.

For J-147, based upon extensive neuroprotection assay data previously published, and the CeeTox assay (C_Tox value of 90 μM) in this study, we estimated in vitro neuroprotection efficacy (EC₅₀ range 0.06–0.115 μM)/toxicity ratio is 782.6–1500 fold and the neurotrophism (EC₅₀ range 0.025 μM)/toxicity ratio is 3600, suggesting that there is a significant therapeutic safety window for J-147 and that it should be further developed as a novel neuroprotective-neurotrophic agent to treat neurodegenerative disease taking into account current National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) RIGOR guidelines.