Repeat hepatectomy for recurred colorectal liver metastasis: is it justified?

HEPATECTOMIES: INDICATIONS AND RESULTS FROM A REFERENCE HOSPITAL IN THE BRAZILIAN AMAZON

BACKGROUND

Hepatectomy is historically associated with higher morbidity and mortality, related to intraoperative blood loss and biliary fistulas. Technological advances and improvements in surgical and anesthetic techniques have led to greater safety in performing these surgeries.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to analyze morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hepatectomy.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing liver resections. The type of hepatectomy, indications, need for intraoperative blood transfusion, hospital stay, complications, and postoperative mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 48 hepatectomies were performed during the studied period, the most common being 26 (54.16%) major hepatectomies, distributed among 13 (50%) left hepatectomies, 11 (42.30%) right hepatectomies, and 2 (7.70%) others. In total, 24 (45.84%) minor hepatectomies were performed, 11 (50%) mono segmentectomies, and 5 (22.72%) left lateral hepatectomies. The main indications for resection in benign diseases were 6 (12.50%) neotropical hepatic hydatidosis, five (10.41%) intrahepatic lithiasis, and in primary malignancies, 9 (18.75%) hepatocarcinomas. There was no need for an intraoperative blood transfusion. Hospital stays after surgery ranged from 2 to 40 days (average=7 days), and 41 (85.42%) patients went to the ICU in the first 72 h after surgery. In total, 9 (18.75%) patients developed postoperative complications. Overall mortality was 2.08%.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatocellular carcinoma and neotropical hydatidosis were the main diseases with surgical indication, and major hepatectomies were the most performed procedures. Morbidity and mortality were in line with results from major global centers.

Hospital variation and outcomes after repeat hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Approximately 70% of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) experiences intrahepatic recurrence after initial liver resection. This study assessed outcomes and hospital variation in repeat liver resections (R-LR).

METHODS

This population-based study included all patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM between 2014 and 2022 in the Netherlands. Overall survival (OS) was collected for patients operated on between 2014 and 2018 by linkage to the insurance database.

RESULTS

Data of 7479 liver resections (1391 (18.6%) repeat and 6088 (81.4%) primary) were analysed. Major morbidity and mortality were not different. Factors associated with major morbidity included ASA 3+, major liver resection, extrahepatic disease, and open surgery. Five-year OS after repeat versus primary liver resection was 42.3% versus 44.8%, P = 0.37. Factors associated with worse OS included largest CRLM >5 cm (aHR 1.58, 95% CI: 1.07-2.34, P = 0.023), >3 CRLM (aHR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.00-1.75, P = 0.046), extrahepatic disease (aHR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.25-2.04, P = 0.001), positive tumour margins (aHR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.09-1.85, P = 0.009). Significant hospital variation in performance of R-LR was observed, median 18.9% (8.2% to 33.3%).

CONCLUSION

Significant hospital variation was observed in performance of R-LR in the Netherlands reflecting different treatment decisions upon recurrence. On a population-based level R-LR leads to satisfactory survival.

Value and prognostic factors of repeat hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal liver metastasis

BACKGROUND

More than 50% of patients with colorectal cancer develop liver metastases. Hepatectomy is the preferred treatment for resectable liver metastases. This review provides a perspective on the utility and relevant prognostic factors of repeat hepatectomy in recurrent colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).

DATA SOURCES

The keywords "recurrent colorectal liver metastases", "recurrent hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer", "liver metastases of colorectal cancer", "repeat hepatectomy", "repeat hepatic resection", "second hepatic resection", and "prognostic factors" were used to retrieve articles published in the PubMed database up to August 2020. Additional articles were identified by a manual search of references from key articles.

RESULTS

Despite improvements in surgical methods and perioperative chemotherapy, recurrence remains common in 37%-68% of patients. Standards or guidelines for the treatment of recurrent liver metastases are lacking. Repeat hepatectomy appears to be the best option for patients with resectable metastases. The commonly reported prognostic factors after repeat hepatectomy were R0 resection, carcinoembryonic antigen level, the presence of extrahepatic disease, a short disease-free interval between initial and repeat hepatectomy, the number (> 1) and size (≥ 5 cm) of hepatic lesions, requiring blood transfusion, and no adjuvant chemotherapy after initial hepatectomy. The median overall survival after repeat hepatectomy ranged from 19.3 to 62 months, and the 5-year overall survival ranged from 21% to 73%. Chemotherapy can act as a test for the biological behavior of tumors with the goal of avoiding unnecessary surgery, and a multimodal approach involving aggressive chemotherapy and repeat hepatectomy might be the treatment of choice for patients with early recurrent CRLM.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat hepatectomy is a relatively safe and effective treatment for resectable recurrent CRLM. The presence or absence of prognostic factors might facilitate patient selection to improve short- and long-term outcomes.

Multicenter study of prognostic factors in paraaortic lymph node dissection for metastatic colorectal cancer

Purpose

The role of paraaortic lymph node dissection (PALND) in colorectal cancer (CRC) has been less evaluated than surgical treatments for other distant metastases. We evaluated surgical outcomes after PALND and identified prognostic factors.

Methods

The medical records of patients who underwent PALND for paraaortic lymph node metastasis (PALNM) were reviewed retrospectively. All patients were categorized into the M1a group (isolated PALNM, n = 27), and the M1bc group (distant metastases other than PALNM, n = 26). Three severity factors (PALNM-SF: number of harvested paraaortic lymph nodes [hLN], ≥14; number of metastatic paraaortic lymph nodes [mLN], ≥5; and lymph nodes ratio [mLN/hLN], ≥0.5) were defined to determine their effects on survival.

Results

The 5-year overall survival (OS) of the M1a and M1bc groups were 61.1% and 6.4%, respectively (P = 0.0013). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of the M1a group was 47.4%, and the 3-year DFS of the M1bc group was 9.1% (P < 0.001). Patients with 2 or more PALNM-SFs showed worse OS than those with 1 PALNM-SF (P = 0.017). In multivariate analysis, M1bc (non-isolated PALNM) was the only significant factor for survival. In the M1a group, patients with 2 or more PALNM-SFs showed significantly worse survival than those with a single PALNM-SF. In multivariate analysis, 2 or more PALNM-SF was a significant factor for survival.

Conclusion

PALND for CRC provided favorable outcomes in the survival of an isolated PALNM, although this was uncertain for non-isolated PALNMs. The PALNM-SFs helped assess the prognosis after PALND.

Safety and long-term prognosis of simultaneous versus staged resection in synchronous colorectal cancer with liver metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The optimal time point for surgical resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCLMs) is still controversial. This meta-analysis evaluated the safety and long-term prognoses of simultaneous and staged resection of SCLM to provide a reference for clinical selection.

METHODS

A systematic literature search for studies published by October 2022 was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library. The evaluated outcome parameters were total, gastrointestinal and hepatic complications, as well as perioperative mortality, intraoperative blood loss, total hospital stay, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 22 nonrandomised and one randomised study comprising 4862 patients. The patients undergoing simultaneous resection of SCLM had similar total (OR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.66-1.19], P = 0.409), gastrointestinal (OR = 1.19, 95% CI [0.89-1.59], P = 0.241) and hepatic (OR = 1.04, 95% CI [0.83-1.31], P = 0.734) complications, as well as perioperative mortality (OR = 1.79, 95% CI [0.88-3.64], P = 0.108), 5-year DFS (HR = 1.26, 95% CI [0.96-1.66], P = 0.098) and 5-year OS (HR = 1.13, 95% CI [0.95-1.34], P = 0.164). Lower intraoperative blood loss (SMD = - 0.39, 95% CI [- 0.60 to - 0.18], P < 0.001) and shorter total hospital stay (WMD = - 5.43, 95% CI [- 7.29 to - 3.58], P < 0.001) were observed in the simultaneous-resection group versus the staged group.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous resection is safe and effective for SCLM patients. The long-term prognosis is equivalent to that of the traditional staged resection. Correct selection of resectable SCLM patients for the simultaneous resection of the primary tumour and liver metastases can be the first choice. Owing to the potential heterogeneity, more RCTs should be included to verify our conclusions.

Outcomes after repeat hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases from the colorectal liver operative metastasis international collaborative (COLOMIC)

BACKGROUND

Resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) is beneficial when feasible. However, the benefit of second hepatectomy for hepatic recurrence in CLM remains unclear.

METHODS

The Colorectal Liver Operative Metastasis International Collaborative retrospectively examined 1004 CLM cases from 2000 to 2018 from a total of 953 patients. Hepatic recurrence after initial hepatectomy was identified in 218 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to offset selection bias. Cox proportional-hazards regression was performed to identify risk factors associated with OS.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients underwent second hepatectomy. Unadjusted median OS was 60.1 months in repeat-hepatectomy versus 38.3 months in the single-hepatectomy group (p = 0.015). In the PSM population, median OS remained significantly better in the repeat-hepatectomy group (60.1 vs. 33.1 months; p = 0.0023); median RFS was 12.4 months for the repeat-hepatectomy group, versus 9.8 months in the single-hepatectomy group (p = 0.0050). Repeat hepatectomy was associated with lower risk of death (hazard ratio: 0.283; p = 0.000012). Obesity, tobacco use, and high intraoperative blood loss were associated with significant risk of death (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In CLM with hepatic recurrence, second hepatectomy was beneficial for OS. With PSM, the OS benefit of performing a second hepatectomy remained significant.

Repeated hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases: is this concept safe and feasible?

Background

The beneficial outcomes of hepatectomy in patients with colorectal metastases have encouraged the attempts of repeated hepatectomy in patients with recurrent disease. Although studies have provided encouraging results regarding perioperative outcomes and survival rates following repeated hepatectomy, it remains unclear whether the reported outcomes reflect the therapeutic results of redo hepatectomy or rather reflect the effect of selection bias. The aim of this study was to investigate differences among patients who underwent single and repeated hepatectomy and to hereby identify prognostic factors that contribute to the premises of repeated resection.

Methods

Patients who underwent hepatectomy due to colorectal metastases were listed in a retrospective database. Study participants were divided into a single partial hepatectomy group, a multiple partial hepatectomies group, and into subgroups of two or more than two hepatectomies.

Results

A total of 338 patients with 439 partial liver resections were included in the analysis. The overall survival rate after 1, 3, and 5 years was 89%, 56%, and 36%, respectively. The survival benefit in patients who underwent multiple partial liver resections versus those with a single partial resection was 10%, 16%, and 4% after 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Repeated hepatectomy was not associated with increased rates of surgical and non-surgical complications.

Conclusion

Beneficial outcomes have been found in terms of median overall survival and perioperative morbidity in patients with recurrence of colorectal hepatic metastases after partial and tissue-sparing repeated liver resections.

Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal liver metastases: A comparative analysis of short- and long-term results

BACKGROUND

Liver recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is frequent. Repeat hepatectomy has been shown to have satisfactory perioperative results. However, the long-term outcomes and the benefits for patients with early recurrence have not been clarified. The aim of this study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing single hepatectomy and repeat hepatectomy for CRLM. Additionally, the oncological outcomes of patients with early (≤ 6 months) and late recurrence who underwent repeat hepatectomy were compared.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM between June 2000 and February 2020 were included and divided into two groups: single hepatectomy and repeat hepatectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 709 patients were included: 649 in the single hepatectomy group and 60 in the repeat hepatectomy group. Patients in the repeat hepatectomy group underwent more cycles of preoperative chemotherapy [4 (3-6) vs. 3 (2-4), P = 0.003]. Patients in the single hepatectomy group more frequently underwent major hepatectomies (34.5% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.004) and had a greater number of lesions resected (2.9 ± 3.6 vs. 1.9 ± 1.8, P = 0.011). There was no increase in operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, or mortality in the repeat hepatectomy group. There were no differences in overall survival (P = 0.626) and disease-free survival (P = 0.579) between the two groups. Similarly, for patients underwent repeat hepatectomy, no difference was observed between the early and late recurrence groups in terms of overall survival (P = 0.771) or disease-free survival (P = 0.350).

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat hepatectomy is feasible and safe, with similar short- and long-term outcomes when compared to single hepatectomy. Surgical treatment of early liver recurrence offers similar oncological outcomes to those obtained for late recurrence.

Liver-Directed Treatment Options Following Liver Tumor Recurrence: A Review of the Literature

Recurrence following curative-intent hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastasis, hepatocellular carcinoma, or cholangiocarcinoma is unfortunately common with a reported incidence as high as 75%. Various treatment modalities can improve survival following disease recurrence. A review of the literature was performed using PubMed. In addition to systemic therapy, liver-directed treatment options for recurrent liver disease include repeat hepatectomy, salvage liver transplantation, radiofrequency or microwave ablation, intra-arterial therapy, and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Repeat resection can be consider for patients with limited recurrent disease that meets resection criteria, as this therapeutic approach can provide a survival benefit and is potentially curative in a subset of patients. Salvage liver transplantation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma is another option, which has been associated with a 5-year survival of 50%. Salvage transplantation may be an option in particular for patients who are not candidates for resection due to underlying liver dysfunction but meet criteria for transplantation. Ablation is another modality to treat patients who recur with smaller tumors and are not surgical candidates due to comorbidity, liver dysfunction, or tumor location. For patients with inoperable disease, transarterial chemoembolization, or radioembolization with Yttrium-90 are liver-directed intra-arterial therapy modalities with relatively low risks that can be utilized. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is another palliative treatment option that can provide a response and local tumor control for smaller tumors.

RE-HEPATECTOMY MEANS MORE MORBIDITY? A MULTICENTRIC ANALYSIS

Colorectal cancer generally metastasizes to the liver. Surgical resection of liver metastasis, which is associated with systemic chemotherapy, is potentially curative, but many patients will present recurrence. In selected patients, repeated hepatectomy is feasible and improves overall survival.

Recurrence and survival after curative-intent treatment for colorectal liver metastases: Implications for adjuvant liver-directed regional chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

This study investigates tumor recurrence patterns and their effect on postrecurrence survival following curative-intent treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) to identify those who stand to benefit the most from adjuvant liver-directed therapy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of all patients that underwent liver resection and/or ablation for CRLM between 2007 and 2019. Postrecurrence survival was compared between recurrence locations. Risk factors for liver recurrence were sought.

RESULTS

The study included 227 patients. Majority were treated with resection (71.0%) while combination resection/ablation (18.9%) and ablation alone (11.0%), were less common. At a median follow-up of 3.0 years, recurrence was observed in 151 (66.5%) patients. Of those, liver, lung, and peritoneal recurrence were most common at 66.9%, 49.6%, and 9.2%, respectively. Median postrecurrence survival after liver, lung, and multisite recurrence was 39.6-, 68.4-, and 33.6 months, respectively. High tumor grade (p < 0.014), perineural invasion (p = 0.002), and N0 node status (p = 0.017) of primary tumor correlated with liver recurrence on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor grade, perineural invasion, and N0 node status of the primary tumor are associated with increased risk of liver recurrence after CRLM resection and represent a target population that may benefit the most from adjuvant liver-directed regional chemotherapy.

Child-Turcotte-Pugh Score as a Predictive Factor for Long-Term Survival After Repeat Hepatectomy for Recurrent Liver Metastases of Colorectal Cancer

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the changes in liver function after repeat hepatectomy and their relationship with survival of patient with colorectal cancer.

Summary of Background Data

Repeat hepatectomy has been accepted as an effective treatment for recurrent liver metastases; however, how repeat hepatectomy changes the liver function during the follow-up period is not well understood.

Methods

Data regarding patients underwent R0 resections at initial hepatectomy for colorectal cancer with liver metastasis from 2012 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into groups according to the total number of hepatectomies. Overall survival and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score after hepatectomy were analyzed.

Results

Fifty-three patients underwent single hepatectomy and 37 patients underwent repeat hepatectomy. There was no significant difference in the overall survival rates between the 2 groups. At 27 months after the initial hepatectomy, mean Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores of patients with repeat hepatectomy started to become statistically higher than those of patients with single hepatectomy. Overall survival of patients who survived after 27 months from the initial hepatectomy showed a statistical difference between the 2 groups. The total number of liver metastases ≥ 4 and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score ≥ 6 at 27 months after the initial hepatectomy were significant risk factors for overall survival of patient who survived after 27 months from the initial hepatectomy.

Conclusions

Liver function after repeat hepatectomy can be deteriorated after a long-term period. Careful approach and continuous assessment of the liver function after hepatectomy are necessary to maintain long-term survival after repeat hepatectomy.

Safety of bioabsorbable membrane (Seprafilim®) in hepatectomy in the era of aggressive liver surgery

BACKGROUND

Repeat hepatectomy has been recognized as an effective treatment for hepatic malignancies, and a sheet type adhesion barrier, Seprafilm® has increasingly been used during hepatectomy to ease future relaparotomy. However, there is not yet sufficient evidence to support the safety of use of Seprafilm in liver surgery.

METHODS

Data of 151 patients who had undergone open hepatectomy were retrospectively reviewed and the incidence of major abdominal morbidity was compared between patients in whom Seprafilm had and had not been used.

RESULTS

Seprafilm was used in 108 patients (Seprafilm group) and no adhesion barrier was used in 43 patients (comparison group). There was no significant difference in the rate of major abdominal morbidities between the two groups (Seprafilm vs. comparison: 10% vs. 16%, P = 0.403). Although the Seprafilm group showed a tendency toward increased incidence of bile leakage (7% vs. 2%), and placement of Seprafilm on the hepatoduodenal ligament or on the visceral surface of the liver seemed to be associated with an increased incidence of major morbidity, multivariate analysis showed no significant correlation between the use of Seprafilm and postoperative major abdominal morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Use of Seprafilm may not increase the risk of major abdominal morbidity in liver surgery.

Resection strategy for colorectal liver metastasis focusing on intrahepatic vessels and resection margins

PURPOSE

We analyzed the impact of surgical margins and vessel preservation on the oncological outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, resected CRLM (n = 242) from 116 patients were assigned to one of the following groups: Group A, apart from vessels (n = 201); Group B, hepatic vein contact (n = 27); or Group C, Glissonean pedicle contact (n = 25). We analyzed the local recurrence rates (LRR) in each group.

RESULTS

The total LRR and that in Groups A, B, and C were 11.6%, 10.4%, 7.4%, and 20%, respectively. In group A, R1 resections were associated with a significantly higher LRR than R0 resections (27.6% vs 7.6%, respectively; P = 0.001); however, the margin widths were not related to the LRR. In group B, the LRR for hepatic vein preservation and resection did not differ. In group C, the Glissonean pedicle preservation group had a higher LRR than the Glissonean pedicle resection group (66.7% vs 5.3%, respectively; P = 0.001). The 5-year overall survival rate of the local recurrence group (25%) was significantly lower than that of the no recurrence group (84%, P < 0.001) and the intrahepatic recurrence group (60%, P = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

R0 resections for CRLM, apart from those involving vessels, can achieve local control. While preserving hepatic vein contact with CRLM is acceptable, the Glissonean pedicle should be resected because of the higher LRR.

Oncological outcomes of repeat metastasectomy for recurrence after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. A case series

Background

Although hepatectomy is the standard and only curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases, recurrence occurs in various organs, including the remnant liver, lung, peritoneum, and others. The outcomes and predictive factors of repeat metastasectomy for recurrence after initial hepatectomy remains controversial.

Methods

We retrospectively assessed a consecutive series of 132 patients who underwent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases in a single institute.

Results

There were 99 recurrence cases after initial hepatectomy, and 42 patients underwent metastasectomy (first repeat metastasectomy) to achieve R0 (17 liver cases, 16 lung cases, and 9 multiple or other cases), while 19 patients underwent subsequent second repeat metastasectomy (4 liver cases, 7 lung cases, and 8 multiple or other cases). Among the 99 recurrent cases after initial hepatectomy, the 5-year overall survival rate of the patients who underwent first repeat metastasectomy was significantly higher than that of chemotherapy/BSC (best supportive care) patients (60% vs. 14%, P < 0.0001). Furthermore, among the 26 recurrent cases after first repeat metastasectomy, the 5-year overall survival rate of the patients who underwent second repeat metastasectomy was significantly higher than that of chemotherapy/BSC patients (P = 0.024). A multivariate analysis revealed that lack of adjuvant chemotherapy, a short (<12 months) disease-free interval, and right-side colon primary were the independent poor prognostic factors for the overall survival after first repeat metastasectomy.

Conclusion

The current study indicated that repeat metastasectomy for recurrence after initial hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases could achieve a longer survival time, especially for patients with favorable predictive factors.

•

Forty-two patients underwent repeat metastasectomy for recurrence after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.

•

Five-year survival rate of the repeat metastasectomy group was significantly higher than that of chemotherapy group.

•

A short disease-free interval was the independent poor prognostic factors for survival after repeat metastasectomy.