The use of extubation readiness parameters: a survey of pediatric critical care physicians

Predictive factors for extubation success in very low and extremely low birth weight preterm infants

Background

Although invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) has contributed to the survival of preterm infants with extremely low birth weight (ELBW), it is also associated with unsatisfactory clinical outcomes when used for prolonged periods. This study aimed to identify factors that may be decisive for extubation success in very low birth weight (VLBW) and extremely low birth weight (ELBW) preterm infants.

Methods

The cohort study included preterm infants with gestational age (GA) <36 weeks, birth weight (BW) <1500 grams who underwent IMV, born between 2015 and 2018. The infants were allocated into two groups: extubation success (SG) or failure (FG). A stepwise logistic regression model was created to determine variables associated with successful extubation.

Results

Eighty-three preterm infants were included. GA and post-extubation arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) were predictive of extubation success. Infants from FG had lower GA and BW, while those from SG had higher weight at extubation and lower post-extubation PaCO2.

Discussion

Although we found post-extubation PaCO2 as an extubation success predictor, which is a variable representative of the moment after the primary outcome, this does not diminish its clinical relevance since extubation does not implicate in ET removal only; it also involves all the aspects that take place within a specified period (72 hours) after the planned event.

Conclusion

GA and post-extubation PaCO2 were predictors for extubation success in VLBW and ELBW preterm infants. Infants who experienced extubation failure had lower birth weight and higher FiO2 prior to extubation.

Pediatric ventilation liberation: evaluating the role of endotracheal secretions in an extubation readiness bundle

BACKGROUND

An evidence gap exists regarding the role of endotracheal secretions in pediatric extubation decisions. This study aims to evaluate whether endotracheal secretion burden independently correlates with pediatric extubation failure.

METHODS

This is a single-center, prospective cohort study of children aged <19 years requiring intubation. Nurses (RN) and respiratory therapists (RT) independently used a novel secretion assessment score focusing on secretion volume, character, and trend. We hypothesized that the RN and RT secretion scores would not correlate with extubation outcome and inter-rater reliability would be poor.

RESULTS

RN secretion character sub-score (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.1-11.1, p = 0.048) was independently associated with extubation failure. RN and RT inter-rater reliability was poor (correlation 0.385, 95% CI 0.339-0.429, p < 0.001). A failure prediction model incorporating the RN secretion character sub-score as well as indication for mechanical ventilation and spontaneous breathing trial result demonstrated an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.817 (95% CI 0.730-0.904, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the general pediatric population, the RN assessment of endotracheal secretion character was independently associated with extubation failure. A model incorporating indication for mechanical ventilation, spontaneous breathing result, and RN assessment of endotracheal secretion character demonstrated reasonable accuracy in predicting failure in those clinically selected for extubation.

IMPACT

Development of comprehensive and sensitive extubation readiness bundles are key to balancing the competing risks of prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation duration and extubation failure. Evidence for clinical factors linked to extubation outcomes in children are limited. Endotracheal secretion burden is a common factor considered but has not been studied. This study supports a role for endotracheal secretion burden, as assessed by the bedside nurse, in extubation readiness bundles. Inter-rater reliability with respiratory therapists was poor. A model incorporating other key factors showed good discrimination for extubation outcome and sets the stage for prospective evaluation in the general population and diagnosis-specific subgroups.

Pediatric Ventilation Liberation: A Survey of International Practice Among 555 Pediatric Intensivists

Pediatric ventilation liberation has limited evidence, likely resulting in wide practice variation. To inform future work, practice patterns must first be described.

Effect of pediatric ventilation weaning technique on work of breathing

Background

Ventilator liberation is one of the most challenging aspects in patients with respiratory failure. Most patients are weaned through a transition from full to partial respiratory support, whereas some advocate using a continuous spontaneous ventilation (CSV). However, there is little scientific evidence supporting the practice of pediatric ventilator liberation, including the timing of onset of and the approach to weaning mode. We sought to explore differences in patient effort between a pressure controlled continuous mode of ventilation (PC-CMV) [in this cohort PC assist/control (PC-A/C)] with a reduced ventilator rate and CSV, and to study changes in patient effort with decreasing PS.

Methods

In this prospective physiology cross-over study, we randomized children < 5 years to first PC-A/C with a 25% reduction in ventilator rate, or CSV (continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP] + PS). Patients were then crossed over to the other arm. Patient effort was measured by calculating inspiratory work of breathing (WOB) using the Campbell diagram (WOB_Campbell), and by pressure–rate-product (PRP) and pressure–time-product (PTP). Respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) was used to calculate the phase angle. Measurements were obtained at baseline, during PC-A/C and CPAP + PS, and during decreasing set PS (maximum -6 cmH₂O).

Results

Thirty-six subjects with a median age of 4.4 (IQR 1.5–11.9) months and median ventilation time of 4.9 (IQR 3.4–7.0) days were included. Nearly all patients (94.4%) were admitted with primary respiratory failure. WOB_Campbell during baseline [0.67 (IQR 0.38–1.07) Joules/L] did not differ between CSV [0.49 (IQR 0.17–0.83) Joules/L] or PC-A/C [0.47 (IQR 0.17–1.15) Joules/L]. Neither PRP, PTP, ∆Pes nor phase angle was different between the two ventilator modes. Reducing pressure support resulted in a statistically significant increase in patient effort, albeit that these differences were clinically negligible.

Conclusions

Patient effort during pediatric ventilation liberation was not increased when patients were in a CSV mode of ventilation compared to a ventilator mode with a ventilator back-up rate. Reducing the level of PS did not lead to clinically relevant increases in patient effort. These data may aid in a better approach to pediatric ventilation liberation.

Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT05254691. Registered 24 February 2022

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-022-02106-6.

Ventilation Liberation Practices Among 380 International PICUs

1) Characterize the prevalence of ventilator liberation protocol use in international PICUs, 2) identify the most commonly used protocol elements, and 3) estimate an international extubation failure rate and use of postextubation noninvasive respiratory support modes.

Co-ordinated multidisciplinary intervention to reduce time to successful extubation for children on mechanical ventilation: the SANDWICH cluster stepped-wedge RCT

BACKGROUND

Daily assessment of patient readiness for liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation can reduce the duration of ventilation. However, there is uncertainty about the effectiveness of this in a paediatric population.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of a ventilation liberation intervention in critically ill children who are anticipated to have a prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation (primary objective) and in all children (secondary objective).

DESIGN

A pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster randomised trial with economic and process evaluations.

SETTING

Paediatric intensive care units in the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Invasively mechanically ventilated children (aged < 16 years).

INTERVENTIONS

The intervention incorporated co-ordinated multidisciplinary care, patient-relevant sedation plans linked to sedation assessment, assessment of ventilation parameters with a higher than usual trigger for undertaking an extubation readiness test and a spontaneous breathing trial on low levels of respiratory support to test extubation readiness. The comparator was usual care. Hospital sites were randomised sequentially to transition from control to intervention and were non-blinded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation until the first successful extubation. The secondary outcome measures were successful extubation, unplanned extubation and reintubation, post-extubation use of non-invasive ventilation, tracheostomy, post-extubation stridor, adverse events, length of intensive care and hospital stay, mortality and cost per respiratory complication avoided at 28 days.

RESULTS

The trial included 10,495 patient admissions from 18 paediatric intensive care units from 5 February 2018 to 14 October 2019. In children with anticipated prolonged ventilation (n = 8843 admissions: control, n = 4155; intervention, n = 4688), the intervention resulted in a significantly shorter time to successful extubation [cluster and time-adjusted median difference -6.1 hours (interquartile range -8.2 to -5.3 hours); adjusted hazard ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.20; p = 0.02] and a higher incidence of successful extubation (adjusted relative risk 1.01, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.02; p = 0.03) and unplanned extubation (adjusted relative risk 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 2.51; p = 0.03), but not reintubation (adjusted relative risk 1.10, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.36; p = 0.38). In the intervention period, the use of post-extubation non-invasive ventilation was significantly higher (adjusted relative risk 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.49; p = 0.04), with no evidence of a difference in intensive care length of stay or other harms, but hospital length of stay was longer (adjusted hazard ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 0.97; p = 0.01). Findings for all children were broadly similar. The control period was associated with lower, but not statistically significantly lower, total costs (cost difference, mean £929.05, 95% confidence interval -£516.54 to £2374.64) and significantly fewer respiratory complications avoided (mean difference -0.10, 95% confidence interval -0.16 to -0.03).

LIMITATIONS

The unblinded intervention assignment may have resulted in performance or detection bias. It was not possible to determine which components were primarily responsible for the observed effect. Treatment effect in a more homogeneous group remains to be determined.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention resulted in a statistically significant small reduction in time to first successful extubation; thus, the clinical importance of the effect size is uncertain.

FUTURE WORK

Future work should explore intervention sustainability and effects of the intervention in other paediatric populations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered as ISRCTN16998143.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 18. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

The Decision to Extubate: The Association Between Clinician Impressions and Objective Extubation Readiness Criteria in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Objective Objective tools such as spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) aim to identify patients ready for extubation and shorten the length of mechanical ventilation (MV). Despite passing an SBT, patients sometimes are not extubated based on clinicians' subjective impressions. In this article, we explored the factors that influence the decision to extubate among pediatric intensivists and their association with objective criteria.

Design This is a single-center prospective observational study.

Setting This study was conducted in an academic, multidisciplinary 20-bed pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

Patients The study group involves mechanically ventilated, orally intubated patients admitted to the PICU from January 1 to June 30, 2019.

Measurements and Main Results Objective clinical data were collected for 650 MV days. Attending surveys about extubation readiness were completed for 419 (64.5%) MV days and 63 extubation events. Extubation occurred on 42% of days after passing an SBT. The primary reasons patients who passed an SBT were not extubated on days were unresolved lung pathology (66.6%) and fluid overload (37.6%). On days without extubation, there was no association between a specific reason for not extubating and SBT result (p > 0.05).

Conclusions In this single-center study, the decision to extubate was not strongly associated with passing an SBT, indicating that clinician impressions, namely unresolved lung pathology and fluid overload, outweighed objective measures for determining extubation readiness. To mitigate morbidities and costs associated with unnecessarily prolonged intubations, a better-defined extubation readiness process is needed to guide the decision to extubate in the pediatric population.

Extubation in the pediatric intensive care unit: predictive methods. An integrative literature review

For extubation in pediatric patients, the evaluation of readiness is strongly recommended. However, a device or practice that is superior to clinical judgment has not yet been accurately determined. Thus, it is important to conduct a review on the techniques of choice in clinical practice to predict extubation failure in pediatric patients. Based on a search in the PubMed®, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases, we conducted a survey of the predictive variables of extubation failure most commonly used in clinical practice in pediatric patients. Of the eight predictors described, the three most commonly used were the spontaneous breathing test, the rapid shallow breathing index and maximum inspiratory pressure. Although the disparity of the data presented in the studies prevented statistical treatment, it was still possible to describe and analyze the performance of these tests.

Rapid Shallow Breathing Index as a Predictor of Extubation Outcomes in Pediatric Patients Underwent Cardiac Surgeries at King Faisal Cardiac Center

Introduction

Weaning patients of ventilation is an important step in the intensive care unit; therefore, assessing the perfect timing to do such critical action is of equal significance to prevent complications. Rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) has been used as a prediction tool for weaning adult patients, but for pediatric patients it is still an area of unclarity. Accordingly, the aim of this study is to evaluate the RSBI as a predictor of extubation outcome in pediatric patients underwent cardiac surgery at King Faisal Cardiac Center from 2016 until 2019.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Faisal Cardiac Center on all extubated children having cardiac surgeries from 2016 to 2019 with excluding the patients who were admitted for causes other than cardiac surgery. Their age was ranged from birth until 14 years. Moreover, the patients were grouped based on the extubation outcomes into: success, success with non-invasive ventilation, or failure which was defined as reintubation within 48 hours after extubation. Regarding the collected data, three readings of RSBI on hourly basis prior to extubation were calculated by dividing respiratory rate (RR) over tidal volume (VT) with a correction based on the body weight.

Results

A total of 86 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thirty (34.9%) patients were successfully extubated, 51 (59.3%) patients had successful extubation with the use of non-invasive ventilation, and only five (5.8%) patients suffered from extubation failure. Two-hour RSBI as a predictor of outcome had a P-value of 0.003, one-hour RSBI had a P-value of 0.01, RSBI at time of extubation had a P-value of 0.02. Mean corpuscular volume (MCV) is higher in extubation failure group with a p-value of 0.01.

Conclusion

This study suggests that pediatric patients who suffer from extubation failure usually have a higher RSBI measurement compared to the patients who have a successful extubation. The most significant RSBI measurements to predict the extubation outcome were recorded two hours prior to extubation. Our study also found that extubation failure patients could have higher MCV than the success group.

Monitoring of Respiratory Muscle Function in Critically Ill Children

OBJECTIVES

This review discusses the different techniques used at the bedside to assess respiratory muscle function in critically ill children and their clinical applications.

DATA SOURCES

A scoping review of the medical literature on respiratory muscle function assessment in critically ill children was conducted using the PubMed search engine.

STUDY SELECTION

We included all scientific, peer-reviewed studies about respiratory muscle function assessment in critically ill children, as well as some key adult studies.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data extracted included findings or comments about techniques used to assess respiratory muscle function.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Various promising physiologic techniques are available to assess respiratory muscle function at the bedside of critically ill children throughout the disease process. During the acute phase, this assessment allows a better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease and an optimization of the ventilatory support to increase its effectiveness and limit its potential complications. During the weaning process, these physiologic techniques may help predict extubation success and therefore optimize ventilator weaning.

CONCLUSIONS

Physiologic techniques are useful to precisely assess respiratory muscle function and to individualize and optimize the management of mechanical ventilation in children. Among all the available techniques, the measurements of esophageal pressure and electrical activity of the diaphragm appear particularly helpful in the era of individualized ventilatory management.

The effect of pressure support on imposed work of breathing during paediatric extubation readiness testing

BACKGROUND

Paediatric critical care practitioners often make use of pressure support (PS) to overcome the perceived imposed work of breathing (WOBimp) during an extubation readiness test (ERT). However, no paediatric data are available that shows the necessity of adding of pressure support during such tests. We sought to measure the WOBimp during an ERT with and without added pressure support and to study its clinical correlate. This was a prospective study in spontaneously breathing ventilated children < 18 years undergoing ERT. Using tracheal manometry, WOBimp was calculated by integrating the difference between positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and tracheal pressure (Ptrach) over the measured expiratory tidal volume (VTe) under two paired conditions: continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with and without PS. Patients with post-extubation upper airway obstruction were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients were studied. Median PS during the ERT was 10 cmH₂O. WOBimp was significantly higher without PS (median 0.27, IQR 0.20-0.50 J/L) than with added PS (median 0.00, IQR 0.00-0.11 J/L). Although there were statistically significant changes in spontaneous breath rate [32 (23-42) vs. 37 (27-46) breaths/min, p < 0.001] and higher ET-CO₂ [5.90 (5.38-6.65) vs. 6.23 (5.55-6.94) kPa, p < 0.001] and expiratory Vt decreased [7.72 (6.66-8.97) vs. 7.08 (5.82-8.08) mL/kg, p < 0.001] in the absence of PS, these changes appeared clinically irrelevant since the Comfort B score remained unaffected [12 (10-13) vs. 12 (10-13), P = 0.987]. Multivariable analysis showed that changes in WOBimp occurred independent of endotracheal tube size.

CONCLUSIONS

Withholding PS during ERT does not lead to clinically relevant increases in WOBimp, irrespective of endotracheal tube size.

Epiglottitis: It Hasn't Gone Away

Due to the potentially unforgiving nature of epiglottitis and supraglottitis, the clinician should have a firm understanding of the presentation, work up, and management of a patient presenting with worrisome symptoms.

An Interprofessional Quality Improvement Initiative to Standardize Pediatric Extubation Readiness Assessment

OBJECTIVES

Establishing protocols to wean mechanical ventilation and assess readiness for extubation, with the goal of minimizing morbidity associated with extubation failure and prolonged mechanical ventilation, have become increasingly important in contemporary PICUs. The aim of this quality improvement initiative is to establish a respiratory therapist-led daily spontaneous breathing trial protocol to standardize extubation readiness assessment and documentation in our PICU.

DESIGN

A quality improvement project.

SETTING

Single center, tertiary care Children's Hospital PICU.

PATIENTS

All intubated patients admitted to PICU requiring conventional mechanical ventilation between February 2013 and January 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

A working group of pediatric intensivists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and information technology specialists established the protocol, standardized documentation via the electronic medical record, and planned education. Daily spontaneous breathing trial protocol implementation began in February 2015. All patients on mechanical ventilation were screened daily at approximately 4 AM by a respiratory therapist to determine daily spontaneous breathing trial eligibility. If all screening criteria were met, patients were placed on continuous positive airway pressure of 5 cm H2O with pressure support of 8 cm H2O for up to 2 hours. If tolerated, patients would be extubated to supplemental oxygen delivered via nasal cannula in the morning, after intensivist approval. Daily audits were done to assess screening compliance and accuracy of documentation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We analyzed data from 398 mechanically ventilated patients during daily spontaneous breathing trial period (February 2015-January 2016), compared with 833 patients from the pre-daily spontaneous breathing trial period (February 2013-January 2015). During the daily spontaneous breathing trial period, daily screening occurred in 92% of patients. Extubation failure decreased from 7.8% in the pre-daily spontaneous breathing trial period to 4.5% in daily spontaneous breathing trial period. The use of high-flow nasal cannula slightly increased during the project, while there was no change in duration of mechanical ventilation or the use of noninvasive ventilation.

CONCLUSIONS

An interprofessionally developed respiratory therapist-led extubation readiness protocol can be successfully implemented in a busy tertiary care PICU without adverse events.

Accuracy of an Extubation Readiness Test in Predicting Successful Extubation in Children With Acute Respiratory Failure From Lower Respiratory Tract Disease

OBJECTIVE

Identifying children ready for extubation is desirable to minimize morbidity and mortality associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and extubation failure. We determined the accuracy of an extubation readiness test (Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure extubation readiness test) in predicting successful extubation in children with acute respiratory failure from lower respiratory tract disease.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of data from the Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure clinical trial, a pediatric multicenter cluster randomized trial of sedation.

SETTING

Seventeen PICUs in the intervention arm.

PATIENTS

Children 2 weeks to 17 years receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for lower respiratory tract disease.

INTERVENTION

Extubation readiness test in which spontaneously breathing children with oxygenation index less than or equal to 6 were placed on FIO2 of 0.50, positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O, and pressure support.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 1,042 children, 444 (43%) passed their first extubation readiness test. Of these, 295 (66%) were extubated within 10 hours of starting the extubation readiness test, including 272 who were successfully extubated, for a positive predictive value of 92%. Among 861 children who were extubated for the first time within 10 hours of performing an extubation readiness test, 788 passed their extubation readiness test and 736 were successfully extubated for a positive predictive value of 93%. The median time of day for extubation with an extubation readiness test was 12:15 hours compared with 14:54 hours for extubation without an extubation readiness test within 10 hours (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In children with acute respiratory failure from lower respiratory tract disease, an extubation readiness test, as described, should be considered at least daily if the oxygenation index is less than or equal to 6. If the child passes the extubation readiness test, there is a high likelihood of successful extubation.

Spontaneous breathing test in the prediction of extubation failure in the pediatric population

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the spontaneous breathing test can predict the extubation failure in pediatric population.

METHODS

A prospective and observational study that evaluated data of inpatients at the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit between May 2011 and August 2013, receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours followed by extubation. The patients were classified in two groups: Test Group, with patients extubated after spontaneous breathing test, and Control Group, with patients extubated without spontaneous breathing test.

RESULTS

A total of 95 children were enrolled in the study, 71 in the Test Group and 24 in the Control Group. A direct comparison was made between the two groups regarding sex, age, mechanical ventilation time, indication to start mechanical ventilation and respiratory parameters before extubation in the Control Group, and before the spontaneous breathing test in the Test Group. There was no difference between the parameters evaluated. According to the analysis of probability of extubation failure between the two groups, the likelihood of extubation failure in the Control Group was 1,412 higher than in the Test Group, nevertheless, this range did not reach significance (p=0.706). This model was considered well-adjusted according to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (p=0.758).

CONCLUSION

The spontaneous breathing test was not able to predict the extubation failure in pediatric population.

OBJETIVO

Avaliar se o teste de respiração espontânea pode ser utilizado para predizer falha da extubação na população pediátrica.

MÉTODOS

Estudo prospectivo, observacional, no qual foram avaliados todos os pacientes internados no Centro de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica, no período de maio de 2011 a agosto de 2013, que utilizaram ventilação mecânica por mais de 24 horas e que foram extubados. Os pacientes foram classificados em dois grupos: Grupo Teste, que incluiu os pacientes extubados depois do teste de respiração espontânea; e Grupo Controle, pacientes foram sem teste de respiração espontânea.

RESULTADOS

Dos 95 pacientes incluídos no estudo, 71 crianças eram do Grupo Teste e 24 eram do Grupo Controle. Os grupos foram comparados em relação a: sexo, idade, tempo de ventilação mecânica, indicação para início da ventilação mecânica e parâmetros ventilatórios pré-extubação, no Grupo Controle, e pré-realização do teste, no Grupo Teste. Não foram observadas diferenças entre os parâmetros analisados. Em relação à análise da probabilidade de falha da extubação entre os dois grupos de estudo, a chance de falha do Grupo Controle foi 1.412 maior do que a das crianças do Grupo Teste, porém este acréscimo não foi significativo (p=0,706). O modelo foi considerado bem ajustado de acordo com o teste de Hosmer-Lemeshow (p=0,758).

CONCLUSÃO

O teste de respiração espontânea para a população pediátrica não foi capaz de prever a falha da extubação.

Rapid shallow breathing index

Predicting successful liberation of patients from mechanical ventilation has been a focus of interest to clinicians practicing in intensive care. Various weaning indices have been investigated to identify an optimal weaning window. Among them, the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) has gained wide use due to its simple technique and avoidance of calculation of complex pulmonary mechanics. Since its first description, several modifications have been suggested, such as the serial measurements and the rate of change of RSBI, to further improve its predictive value. The objective of this paper is to review the utility of RSBI in predicting weaning success. In addition, the use of RSBI in specific patient populations and the reported modifications of RSBI technique that attempt to improve the utility of RSBI are also reviewed.

Pediatric extubation readiness tests should not use pressure support

PURPOSE

Pressure support is often used for extubation readiness testing, to overcome perceived imposed work of breathing from endotracheal tubes. We sought to determine whether effort of breathing on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) of 5 cmH2O is higher than post-extubation effort, and if this is confounded by endotracheal tube size or post-extubation noninvasive respiratory support.

METHODS

Prospective trial in intubated children. Using esophageal manometry we compared effort of breathing with pressure rate product under four conditions: pressure support 10/5 cmH2O, CPAP 5 cmH2O (CPAP), and spontaneous breathing 5 and 60 min post-extubation. Subgroup analysis excluded post-extubation upper airway obstruction (UAO) and stratified by endotracheal tube size and post-extubation noninvasive respiratory support.

RESULTS

We included 409 children. Pressure rate product on pressure support [100 (IQR 60, 175)] was lower than CPAP [200 (120, 300)], which was lower than 5 min [300 (150, 500)] and 60 min [255 (175, 400)] post-extubation (all p < 0.01). Excluding 107 patients with post-extubation UAO (where pressure rate product after extubation is expected to be higher), pressure support still underestimated post-extubation effort by 126-147 %, and CPAP underestimated post-extubation effort by 17-25 %. For all endotracheal tube subgroups, ≤3.5 mmID (n = 152), 4-4.5 mmID (n = 102), and ≥5.0 mmID (n = 48), pressure rate product on pressure support was lower than CPAP and post-extubation (all p < 0.0001), while CPAP pressure rate product was not different from post-extubation (all p < 0.05). These findings were similar for patients extubated to noninvasive respiratory support, where pressure rate product on pressure support before extubation was significantly lower than pressure rate product post-extubation on noninvasive respiratory support (p < 0.0001, n = 81).

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of endotracheal tube size, pressure support during extubation readiness tests significantly underestimates post-extubation effort of breathing.

Risk Factors for Extubation Failure Following Neonatal Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Extubation failure after neonatal cardiac surgery has been associated with considerable postoperative morbidity, although data identifying risk factors for its occurrence are sparse. We aimed to determine risk factors for extubation failure in our neonatal cardiac surgical population.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Urban tertiary care free-standing children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Neonates (0-30 d) who underwent cardiac surgery at our institution between January 2009 and December 2012 was performed.

INTERVENTIONS

Extubation failure was defined as reintubation within 72 hours after extubation from mechanical ventilation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors for extubation failure.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We included 120 neonates, of whom 21 (17.5%) experienced extubation failure. On univariate analysis, patients who failed extubation were more likely to have genetic abnormalities (24% vs 6%; p = 0.023), hypoplastic left heart (43% vs 17%; p = 0.009), delayed sternal closure (38% vs 12%; p = 0.004), postoperative infection prior to extubation (38% vs 11%; p = 0.002), and longer duration of mechanical ventilation (median, 142 vs 58 hr; p = 0.009]. On multivariate analysis, genetic abnormalities, hypoplastic left heart, and postoperative infection remained independently associated with extubation failure. Furthermore, patients with infection who failed extubation tended to receive fewer days of antibiotics prior to their first extubation attempt when compared with patients with infection who did not fail extubation (4.9 ± 2.6 vs 7.3 ± 3; p = 0.073).

CONCLUSIONS

Neonates with underlying genetic abnormalities, hypoplastic left heart, or postoperative infection were at increased risk for extubation failure. A more conservative approach in these patients, including longer pre-extubation duration of antibiotic therapy for postoperative infections, may be warranted.