Successful living donor intestinal transplantation in cross-match positive recipients: Initial experience

Chimerism-Mediated Tolerance in Intestinal Transplantation

In this review, the authors outlined concepts and strategies to achieve immune tolerance through inducing hematopoietic chimerism after solid organ transplantation and introduced challenges and opportunities in harnessing two-way alloresponses to improve outcomes after intestinal transplantation (ITx). Next, the authors discussed the dynamics and phenotypes of peripheral blood and intestinal graft T-cell subset chimerism and their association with outcomes. The authors also summarized studies on other types of immune cells after ITx and their potential participation in chimerism-mediated tolerance. The authors further discussed strategies and future directions to promote chimerism-associated tolerance after ITx to overcome rejection and minimize immunosuppression.

B-Cell Induction Therapies in Intestinal Transplantation

Despite advancements in short-term outcomes since the inception of intestinal transplant, significant long-term graft failure persists. Early successes are attributed to the utilization of tacrolimus for maintenance therapy, coupled with T-cell modulating induction regimens, which effectively reduce the incidence of acute cellular rejection. However, the challenge of chronic allograft injury remains unresolved. There is increasing evidence indicating a correlation between donor-specific antibodies and the survival of visceral allografts. Strategies aimed at reducing the presence or load of these antibodies may potentially enhance long-term outcomes. Consequently, our focus is now turning toward B-cell induction therapies as a possible solution.

Updates in induction immunosuppression regimens for intestinal transplantation

Intestinal allografts are the most immunologically complex and carry the highest risk of rejection among solid organ transplantation, necessitating complex immunosuppressive management. We evaluated the latest information regarding induction immunosuppression, with an emphasis on established, novel, and emergent therapies. We also reviewed classic and novel induction immunosuppression strategies for highly sensitized recipients. Comparable progress has been made in intestinal transplantation clinical outcomes since the implementation of induction strategies. This review shows a clear diversity of induction protocols can be observed across different centers. The field of intestinal transplantation is still in its early stages, which is further complicated by the limited number of institutions capable of intestinal transplantation and their geographical variation, which further hinders the development of adequately powered studies in comparison to other organs. As the implementation of institution-specific induction protocols becomes more refined and results are disseminated, future research efforts should be directed towards the development of efficacious induction strategies.

Outcome After Intestinal Transplantation From Living Versus Deceased Donors: A Propensity-matched Cohort Analysis of the International Intestinal Transplant Registry

OBJECTIVE

To describe the worldwide experience with living donation (LD) in intestinal transplantation (ITx) and compare short-term and long-term outcomes to a propensity-matched cohort of deceased donors.

BACKGROUND

ITx is a rare life-saving procedure for patients with complicated intestinal failure (IF). Living donation (LD)-ITx has been performed with success, but no direct comparison with deceased donation (DD) has been performed. The Intestinal Transplant Registry (ITR) was created in 1985 by the Intestinal Transplant Association to capture the worldwide activity and promote center's collaborations.

METHODS

Based on the ITR, 4156 ITx were performed between January 1987 and April 2019, of which 76 (1.8%) were LD, including 5 combined liver-ITx, 7 ITx-colon, and 64 isolated ITx. They were matched with 186 DD-ITx for recipient age/sex, weight, region, IF-cause, retransplant, pretransplant status, ABO compatibility, immunosuppression, and transplant date. Primary endpoints were acute rejection and 1-/5-year patient/graft survival.

RESULTS

Most LDs were performed in North America (61%), followed by Asia (29%). The mean recipient age was: 22 years; body mass index: 19kg/m²; and female/male ratio: 1/1.4. Volvulus (N=17) and ischemia (N=17) were the most frequent IF-causes. Fifty-two percent of patients were at home at the time of transplant. One-/5-year patient survival for LD and DD was 74.2/49.8% versus 80.3/48.1%, respectively ( P =0.826). One-/5-year graft survival was 60.3/40.6% versus 69.2/36.1%, respectively ( P =0.956). Acute rejection was diagnosed in 47% of LD versus 51% of DD ( P =0.723).

CONCLUSION

Worldwide, LD-ITx has been rarely performed. This retrospective matched ITR analysis revealed no difference in rejection and in patient/graft survival between LD and DD-ITx.

Small bowel transplant - novel indications and recent progress

INTRODUCTION

Advances in the management of intestinal failure have led to a reduction in the number of intestinal transplants. The number of bowel transplants has been mainly stable even though a slight increase has been observed in the last 5 years.

AREAS COVERED

Standard indication includes patients with a reasonable life expectancy. Recent progress can be deduced by the increased number of intestine transplants in adults: this is due to the continuous improvement of 1-year graft survival worldwide (without differences in 3- and 5-year) associated with better abdominal wall closure techniques. This review aims to provide an update on new indications and changes in trends of pediatric and adult intestine transplantation. This analysis, which stretches through the past 5 years, is based on a collection of related manuscripts from PubMed.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Intestinal transplants should be solely intended for a group of individuals for whom indications for transplantation are clear and both medical and surgical rehabilitations have failed. Nevertheless, many protocols developed over the years have not yet solved the key question represented by the over-immunosuppression. Novel indications and recent progress in the bowel transplant field, minimal yet consistent, represent a pathway to be followed.

Successful combined auxiliary partial liver and intestinal transplantation in two highly sensitized, cross-match positive patients

INTRODUCTION

Sensitization to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) creates an immunological barrier to intestinal transplantation (ITx). Current desensitization therapies are limited and ineffective in the most highly sensitized patients. A co-transplanted whole liver transplant can protect a kidney, heart, or intestinal allograft from antibody-mediated injury. Whether an auxiliary partial liver allograft provides effective protection for highly sensitized intestinal transplant recipients is unknown.

METHODS

Two patients with strong HLA donor-specific antibody at high titer against their deceased donors underwent combined auxiliary partial liver and ITx across a positive cross-match. The left lateral lobes from the combined-graft recipients and the right liver lobes from the deceased donors were transplanted as a domino procedure to other four patients.

RESULTS

Two combined-graft recipients have had an uneventful postoperative course without major complications at a 12- and 24-month follow-up, respectively. Intestinal graft function has been excellent with no evidence of humoral or cellular rejection. While a positive cross-match turned negative, titers of donor-specific HLA antibodies gradually declined over time after transplant. The left liver lobes procured from the combined-graft recipients were successfully transplanted into two pediatric patients (age 1.9, 2.4 years) and the right lobes from two deceased donors were successfully transplanted into two adult patients. All transplant procedures went well, without post-operative complications related to the splitting technique.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that an auxiliary liver transplant can effectively protect a co-transplanted intestinal allograft against rejection and suggest that this combined procedure may serve as a useful therapeutic adjunct for a highly sensitized intestinal transplant candidate.

Update on immunosuppressive strategies in intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The intestine is the most immunologically complex solid organ allograft with the greatest risk of both rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). High levels of immunosuppression are required, further increasing morbidity. Due to low volume of transplants and few centers with experience, there is paucity of evidence-based, standardized, and effective therapeutic regimens. We herein review the most recent data about immunosuppression, focusing on novel and emerging therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent data are moving the field toward increasing use of basilixumab and consideration of alemtuzumab for induction and inclusion of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and antimetabolites for maintenance. For rejection, we highlight novel roles for tumor necrosis factor-α inhibition, α4β7 integrin inhibition, microbiome modulation, desensitization protocols, and tolerance induction strategies. We also highlight emerging novel therapies for GVHD, especially the promising role of Janus kinase inhibition.

SUMMARY

New insights into immune pathways associated with rejection and GVHD in intestinal allografts have led to an evolution of therapies from broad-based immunosuppression to more targeted strategies that hold promise for reducing morbidity from infection, rejection, and GVHD. These should be the focus of further study to facilitate their widespread use.

Is There a Role for Desensitization in Intestinal Transplantation?

Human leukocyte antigen allosensitization prior to transplant can increase the risk of early graft loss and prolong waitlist times for intestinal transplant candidates. Desensitization offers a potential therapeutic option to reduce the quantity of preformed antibodies prior to organ allocation and facilitate transplantation with a more immunologically compatible donor allograft. However, there remains a paucity of data to guide the use of desensitization in the setting of intestinal transplantation. As a result, in this review we evaluate the existing literature supporting the role of desensitization therapy in intestinal transplant, describe our own experience with the implementation of a risk-stratified desensitization protocol, and finally explore barriers and unanswered questions that continue to limit the widespread adoption of desensitization as a management strategy for highly sensitized intestinal transplant candidates.

Composite and Multivisceral Transplantation: Nomenclature, Surgical Techniques, Current Practice, and Long-term Outcome

The successful development of multivisceral and composite visceral transplantation is among the milestones in the recent history of human organ transplantation. All types of gastrointestinal transplantation have evolved to be the standard of care for patients with gut failure and complex abdominal pathologic conditions. The outcome has markedly improved over the last 3 decades owing to technical innovation, novel immunosuppression, and better postoperative care. Recent data documented significant improvement in the long-term therapeutic indices of all types of visceral transplantation close to that achieved with thoracic and solid abdominal organs.

Duodenocolostomy as Treatment of Ileus in Short Bowel Syndrome: A Case Report

Patient: Male, 68

Final Diagnosis: Short bowel syndrome • small bowel obstruction

Symptoms: Inablility to sustain oral nutrition

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Duodenocolostomy

Specialty: Surgery

Composite and Multivisceral Transplantation: Nomenclature, Surgical Techniques, Current Practice, and Long-term Outcome

The successful development of multivisceral and composite visceral transplantation is among the milestones in the recent history of human organ transplantation. All types of gastrointestinal transplantation have evolved to be the standard of care for patients with gut failure and complex abdominal pathologic conditions. The outcome has markedly improved over the last 3 decades owing to technical innovation, novel immunosuppression, and better postoperative care. Recent data documented significant improvement in the long-term therapeutic indices of all types of visceral transplantation close to that achieved with thoracic and solid abdominal organs.

Living Donor Intestinal Transplantation

Living donor intestinal transplantation (LDIT) has been improved leading to results comparable to those obtained with deceased donors. LDIT should be limited to specific indications and patient selection. The best indication is combined living donor intestinal/liver transplantation in pediatric recipients with intestinal and hepatic failure; the virtual elimination of waiting time may avoid the high mortality experienced by candidates on the deceased waiting list. Potentially, LDIT could be used in highly sensitized recipients to allow the application of de-sensitization protocols. In the case of available identical twins or HLA-identical sibling, LDIT has a significant immunologic advantage and should be offered.

Updates on antibody-mediated rejection in intestinal transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) has increasingly emerged as an important cause of allograft loss after intestinal transplantation (ITx). Compelling evidence indicates that donor-specific antibodies can mediate and promote acute and chronic rejection after ITx. However, diagnostic criteria for ABMR after ITx have not been established yet and the mechanisms of antibody-mediated graft injury are not well-known. Effective approaches to prevent and treat ABMR are required to improve long-term outcomes of intestine recipients. Clearly, ABMR after ITx has become an important area for research and clinical investigation.

Management and Complications of Short Bowel Syndrome: an Updated Review

Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is defined as loss of bowel mass from surgical resection, congenital defects, or disease. Intestinal failure (IF) includes the subset of SBS unable to meet nutrition needs with enteral supplements and requires parenteral nutrition (PN). The parenteral treatment of SBS is now a half-century old. Recent pharmacologic treatment (GLP-2 analogues) has begun to make a significant impact in the care and ultimate management of these patients such that the possibility of reducing PN requirements in formerly PN-dependent patients is a now a real possibility. Finally, newer understanding and possible treatment for some of the complications related to IF have more recently evolved and will be an emphasis of this report. This review will focus on developments over the last 10 years with the goal of updating the reader to new advances in our understanding of the care and feeding of the SBS patient.