1
|
James C, James SJ, Onarinde BA, Dixon RA, Williams N. A Critical Review of AMR Risks Arising as a Consequence of Using Biocides and Certain Metals in Food Animal Production. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:1569. [PMID: 37998771 PMCID: PMC10668721 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12111569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The focus of this review was to assess what evidence exists on whether, and to what extent, the use of biocides (disinfectants and sanitizers) and certain metals (used in feed and other uses) in animal production (both land and aquatic) leads to the development and spread of AMR within the food chain. A comprehensive literature search identified 3434 publications, which after screening were reduced to 154 relevant publications from which some data were extracted to address the focus of the review. The review has shown that there is some evidence that biocides and metals used in food animal production may have an impact on the development of AMR. There is clear evidence that metals used in food animal production will persist, accumulate, and may impact on the development of AMR in primary animal and food production environments for many years. There is less evidence on the persistence and impact of biocides. There is also particularly little, if any, data on the impact of biocides/metal use in aquaculture on AMR. Although it is recognized that AMR from food animal production is a risk to human health there is not sufficient evidence to undertake an assessment of the impact of biocide or metal use on this risk and further focused in-field studies are needed provide the evidence required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian James
- Formerly Food Refrigeration & Process Engineering Research Centre (FRPERC), Grimsby Institute, Nuns Corner, Grimsby DN34 5BQ, UK;
- National Centre for Food Manufacturing (NCFM), University of Lincoln, South Lincolnshire Food Enterprise Zone, Peppermint Way, Holbeach PE12 7FJ, UK;
| | - Stephen J. James
- Formerly Food Refrigeration & Process Engineering Research Centre (FRPERC), Grimsby Institute, Nuns Corner, Grimsby DN34 5BQ, UK;
- National Centre for Food Manufacturing (NCFM), University of Lincoln, South Lincolnshire Food Enterprise Zone, Peppermint Way, Holbeach PE12 7FJ, UK;
| | - Bukola A. Onarinde
- National Centre for Food Manufacturing (NCFM), University of Lincoln, South Lincolnshire Food Enterprise Zone, Peppermint Way, Holbeach PE12 7FJ, UK;
| | - Ronald A. Dixon
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7DL, UK;
| | - Nicola Williams
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston CH64 7TE, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oguadinma I, Mishra A, Dev Kumar G. Antibiotic resistance associated lactic acid cross tolerance in Shiga-toxin producing E. coli. Front Microbiol 2023; 14:1059144. [PMID: 37180239 PMCID: PMC10169816 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1059144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The occurrence of antibiotic resistant (ABR) bacteria in foods is a growing public health challenge. We evaluated sanitizer cross-tolerance among ABR Escherichia coli (E. coli) O157:H7 and non-O157:H7 Shiga-toxin producing E. coli (STEC) serogroups. Sanitizer tolerance in STEC could be a public health concern as mitigation strategies against the pathogen might be compromised. Methods Resistance to ampicillin and streptomycin were evolved in E. coli serogroups: O157:H7 (H1730, and ATCC 43895), O121:H19 and O26:H11. Resistance to antibiotics was evolved chromosomally through incremental exposure to ampicillin (amp C) and streptomycin (strep C). Transformation using a plasmid was performed to confer resistance to ampicillin to generate amp P strep C. Results The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of lactic acid for all strains evaluated was 0.375% v/v. Analysis of bacterial growth parameters in tryptic soy broth amended with 0.0625% v/v, 0.125% v/v, and 0.25% v/v (subMIC) lactic acid indicated that growth correlated positively with the lag phase duration, and negatively with both the maximum growth rate and change in population density for all strains evaluated except for the highly tolerant variant- O157:H7 amp P strep C. Strains O121 NR (non-ABR), O121 amp C, O121 amp P strep C, O157:H7 H1730 amp C and O157:H7 H1730 amp P strep C were not inactivated after exposure to 1% and 2.5% v/v lactic acid for 300 s. No recovery of cells was observed after the strains were exposed to 5% v/v lactic acid for 300 s. ABR strains O157:H7 H1730 amp C and O157: H7 H1730 amp P strep C demonstrated a high tolerance to lactic acid (P ≤ 0.05). Conclusion ABR in isolate E. coli O157: H7 H1730 may improve tolerance to lactic acid. Increased tolerance may be discerned by evaluating growth parameters of bacteria in presence of sub-MIC levels of lactic acid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ikechukwu Oguadinma
- Center for Food Safety, The University of Georgia, Griffin, GA, United States
| | - Abhinav Mishra
- Department of Food Science & Technology, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Neuhaus S, Feßler AT, Dieckmann R, Thieme L, Pletz MW, Schwarz S, Al Dahouk S. Towards a Harmonized Terminology: A Glossary for Biocide Susceptibility Testing. Pathogens 2022; 11:pathogens11121455. [PMID: 36558789 PMCID: PMC9780826 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11121455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Disinfection is a key strategy to reduce the burden of infections. The contact of bacteria to biocides-the active substances of disinfectants-has been linked to bacterial adaptation and the development of antimicrobial resistance. Currently, there is no scientific consensus on whether the excessive use of biocides contributes to the emergence and spread of multidrug resistant bacteria. The comprehensive analysis of available data remains a challenge because neither uniform test procedures nor standardized interpretive criteria nor harmonized terms are available to describe altered bacterial susceptibility to biocides. In our review, we investigated the variety of criteria and the diversity of terms applied to interpret findings in original studies performing biocide susceptibility testing (BST) of field isolates. An additional analysis of reviews summarizing the knowledge of individual studies on altered biocide susceptibility provided insights into currently available broader concepts for data interpretation. Both approaches pointed out the urgent need for standardization. We, therefore, propose that the well-established and approved concepts for interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing data should serve as a role model to evaluate biocide resistance mechanisms on a single cell level. Furthermore, we emphasize the adaptations necessary to acknowledge the specific needs for the evaluation of BST data. Our approach might help to increase scientific awareness and acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Szilvia Neuhaus
- German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany
- Correspondence: (S.N.); (R.D.)
| | - Andrea T. Feßler
- Centre for Infection Medicine, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Microbiology and Epizootics, Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany
- Veterinary Centre for Resistance Research (TZR), Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany
| | - Ralf Dieckmann
- German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany
- Correspondence: (S.N.); (R.D.)
| | - Lara Thieme
- Institute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany
- Leibniz Center for Photonics in Infection Research, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany
| | - Mathias W. Pletz
- Institute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany
| | - Stefan Schwarz
- Centre for Infection Medicine, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Microbiology and Epizootics, Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany
- Veterinary Centre for Resistance Research (TZR), Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany
| | - Sascha Al Dahouk
- German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oguadinma IC, Mishra A, Juneja VK, Dev Kumar G. Antibiotic Resistance Influences Growth Rates and Cross-Tolerance to Lactic Acid in Escherichia coli O157:H7 H1730. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2022; 19:622-629. [PMID: 35856661 DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2022.0009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Escherichia coli O157:H7-contaminated beef has been implicated in numerous foodborne outbreaks. Contamination occurs despite the use of antimicrobial interventions such as lactic acid (LA). In addition, resistance to antibiotics such as ampicillin and streptomycin among isolates has been frequently reported. The influence of antibiotic resistance (ABR) on growth rates and cross-tolerance of lettuce isolate E. coli O157:H7 H1730 to LA was evaluated. Antibiotic-resistant strain variants were generated by conferring resistance to either ampicillin (ampC) or streptomycin (strepC) or both ampicillin and streptomycin (ampC strepC) through incremental exposure to the antibiotics. Ampicillin resistance was also conferred by plasmid transformation to generate the ampP and ampP strepC strains. The minimum inhibitory concentration of LA on all the strains evaluated was 0.375% v/v. The lag phase duration of all strains except E. coli O157:H7 ampP strepC increased with increasing concentration of LA. The ampP strepC and ampC strains were most tolerant to 5% LA with declines in the cell population of 2.86 and 2.56 log CFU/mL, respectively (p < 0.05). The ampP strepC strain was the most tolerant when evaluated by the live/dead viability assay. The addition of the efflux pump inhibitor, carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone, with 2.5% LA resulted in a significant increase in sensitivity in the no resistance (NR) wild-type and ampC strains, resulting in 6.62 and 6.65 log CFU/mL reduction, respectively, while the highly tolerant ampP strepC strain had a 2.90 log CFU/mL decrease. Tolerance to LA was significantly influenced by both the ABR profile of the strain and LA concentration. The results from this study indicate that E. coli O157:H7 strains with certain ABR profiles might be more tolerant to LA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ikechukwu Chukwuma Oguadinma
- Center for Food Safety, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, Georgia, USA
| | - Abhinav Mishra
- Department of Food Science & Technology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
| | - Vijay K Juneja
- Eastern Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Govindaraj Dev Kumar
- Center for Food Safety, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Beier RC, Andrews K, Hume ME, Sohail MU, Harvey RB, Poole TL, Crippen TL, Anderson RC. Disinfectant and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Studies of Staphylococcus aureus Strains and ST398-MRSA and ST5-MRSA Strains from Swine Mandibular Lymph Node Tissue, Commercial Pork Sausage Meat and Swine Feces. Microorganisms 2021; 9:microorganisms9112401. [PMID: 34835526 PMCID: PMC8621428 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9112401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) causes gastrointestinal illness worldwide. Disinfectants are used throughout the food chain for pathogenic bacteria control. We investigated S. aureus bioavailability in swine Mandibular lymph node tissue (MLT) and pork sausage meat (PSM), established susceptibility values for S. aureus to disinfectants, and determined the multilocus sequence type of MRSA strains. Antimicrobial and disinfectant susceptibility profiles were determined for 164 S. aureus strains isolated from swine feces (n = 63), MLT (n = 49) and PSM (n = 52). No antimicrobial resistance (AMR) was detected to daptomycin, nitrofurantoin, linezolid, and tigecycline, while high AMR prevalence was determined to erythromycin (50.6%), tylosin tartrate (42.7%), penicillin (72%), and tetracycline (68.9%). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains, ST398 (n = 6) and ST5 (n = 1), were found in the MLT and PSM, 4 MRSA in MLT and 3 MRSA strains in the PSM. About 17.5% of feces strains and 41.6% of MLT and PSM strains were resistant to chlorhexidine. All strains were susceptible to triclosan and benzalkonium chloride, with no cross-resistance between antimicrobials and disinfectants. Six MRSA strains had elevated susceptibilities to 18 disinfectants. The use of formaldehyde and tris(hydroxylmethyl)nitromethane in DC&R was not effective, which can add chemicals to the environment. Didecyldimethylammonium chloride and benzyldimethylhexadecylammonium chloride were equally effective disinfectants. ST398 and ST5 MRSA strains had elevated susceptibilities to 75% of the disinfectants tested. This study establishes susceptibility values for S. aureus strains from swine feces, mandibular lymph node tissue, and commercial pork sausage against 24 disinfectants. Since it was demonstrated that S. aureus and MRSA strains can be found deep within swine lymph node tissue, it may be beneficial for the consumer if raw swine lymph node tissue is not used in uncooked food products and pork sausage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ross C. Beier
- Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, TX 77845, USA; (K.A.); (M.E.H.); (R.B.H.); (T.L.P.); (T.L.C.); (R.C.A.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Kathleen Andrews
- Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, TX 77845, USA; (K.A.); (M.E.H.); (R.B.H.); (T.L.P.); (T.L.C.); (R.C.A.)
| | - Michael E. Hume
- Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, TX 77845, USA; (K.A.); (M.E.H.); (R.B.H.); (T.L.P.); (T.L.C.); (R.C.A.)
| | - Muhammad Umar Sohail
- Proteomics Core, Weill Cornell Medicine, Qatar Foundation—Education City, Doha P.O. Box 24144, Qatar;
| | - Roger B. Harvey
- Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, TX 77845, USA; (K.A.); (M.E.H.); (R.B.H.); (T.L.P.); (T.L.C.); (R.C.A.)
| | - Toni L. Poole
- Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, TX 77845, USA; (K.A.); (M.E.H.); (R.B.H.); (T.L.P.); (T.L.C.); (R.C.A.)
| | - Tawni L. Crippen
- Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, TX 77845, USA; (K.A.); (M.E.H.); (R.B.H.); (T.L.P.); (T.L.C.); (R.C.A.)
| | - Robin C. Anderson
- Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, TX 77845, USA; (K.A.); (M.E.H.); (R.B.H.); (T.L.P.); (T.L.C.); (R.C.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Genetic but No Phenotypic Associations between Biocide Tolerance and Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli from German Broiler Fattening Farms. Microorganisms 2021; 9:microorganisms9030651. [PMID: 33801066 PMCID: PMC8003927 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9030651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Biocides are frequently applied as disinfectants in animal husbandry to prevent the transmission of drug-resistant bacteria and to control zoonotic diseases. Concerns have been raised, that their use may contribute to the selection and persistence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Especially, extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and AmpC β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli have become a global health threat. In our study, 29 ESBL-/AmpC-producing and 64 NON-ESBL-/AmpC-producing E.coli isolates from three German broiler fattening farms collected in 2016 following regular cleaning and disinfection were phylogenetically characterized by whole genome sequencing, analyzed for phylogenetic distribution of virulence-associated genes, and screened for determinants of and associations between biocide tolerance and antibiotic resistance. Of the 30 known and two unknown sequence types detected, ST117 and ST297 were the most common genotypes. These STs are recognized worldwide as pandemic lineages causing disease in humans and poultry. Virulence determinants associated with extraintestinal pathogenic E.coli showed variable phylogenetic distribution patterns. Isolates with reduced biocide susceptibility were rarely found on the tested farms. Nine isolates displayed elevated MICs and/or MBCs of formaldehyde, chlorocresol, peroxyacetic acid, or benzalkonium chloride. Antibiotic resistance to ampicillin, trimethoprim, and sulfamethoxazole was most prevalent. The majority of ESBL-/AmpC-producing isolates carried blaCTX-M (55%) or blaCMY-2 (24%) genes. Phenotypic biocide tolerance and antibiotic resistance were not interlinked. However, biocide and metal resistance determinants were found on mobile genetic elements together with antibiotic resistance genes raising concerns that biocides used in the food industry may lead to selection pressure for strains carrying acquired resistance determinants to different antimicrobials.
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen Q, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Li K, Liu B, Yue T. Bactericidal effect of glycerol monolaurate complex disinfectants on Salmonella of chicken. Int J Food Microbiol 2021; 345:109150. [PMID: 33735782 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2020] [Revised: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Glycerol monolaurate (GML) is a monoglycerol ester of the fatty lauric acids, which has a wide-spectrum antimicrobial capacity, but fails to inactivate Gram-negative bacteria, especial Salmonella. To enhance the population reduction rate of GML for Salmonella, this reagent was combined with three disinfectants: lactic acid (LA), cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), and trisodium phosphate (TSP), which can present acid, neutral, and alkaline in solution, respectively. The results showed that the 1% GML and a complex disinfectant (0.5% GML-0.025% LA) could powerfully inactivate Salmonella. Their population reduction rates respectively were able to achieve 99.92% and 98.29% with the vortex treatment, indicating that the vortex treatment could improve GML to destruct the outer membrane of Salmonella. During the simulation test of the soaking and rinse processing of chicken, for a short time (0 h), the effect of 0.5% GML-0.025% LA compound was better and more suitable for instantaneous inactivation than others, while for a long time (4 h), 1% GML exhibited a better bactericidal effect, which indicated it to be more suitable for long-term bacteriostasis. The characterization of color and texture for chicken samples were determined using Colormeter Ci7600, TA.XT Plus and Hyper-spectral Imager, which demonstrated that all samples treated by these complex disinfectants were not significantly different from untreated group. In conclusion, GML is a potential and superior disinfectant for the chicken process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Chen
- College of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China; Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling, China; National Engineering Research Center of Agriculture Integration Test, Yangling, China
| | - Yaxin Liu
- College of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China; Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling, China; National Engineering Research Center of Agriculture Integration Test, Yangling, China
| | - Ziyi Zhang
- College of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China; Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling, China; National Engineering Research Center of Agriculture Integration Test, Yangling, China
| | - Ke Li
- Zhejiang Academy of Science & Technology for Inspection & Quarantine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Bin Liu
- College of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China; Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling, China; National Engineering Research Center of Agriculture Integration Test, Yangling, China.
| | - Tianli Yue
- College of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China; Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling, China; National Engineering Research Center of Agriculture Integration Test, Yangling, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Disinfectant and antimicrobial susceptibility studies of the foodborne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni isolated from the litter of broiler chicken houses. Poult Sci 2020; 100:1024-1033. [PMID: 33518061 PMCID: PMC7858144 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.10.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Foodborne illness is an ongoing problem worldwide and is caused by bacteria that invade the food chain from the farm, slaughter house, restaurant or grocery, or in the home and can be controlled by strategies using biocides (antiseptics and disinfectants). Susceptibility profiles were determined for 96 Campylobacter jejuni strains obtained in 2011-2012 from broiler chicken house environments to antimicrobials and disinfectants as per the methods of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and TREK Diagnostics using CAMPY AST Campylobacter plates. Low prevalence of antimicrobial resistance was observed in C. jejuni strains to tetracycline (TET; 21.9%), ciprofloxacin (CIP; 13.5%), and nalidixic acid (NAL; 12.5%). The resistance profiles had a maximum of 3 antimicrobials, CIP-NAL-TET, with TET being the main profile observed. No cross-resistance was observed between antimicrobials and disinfectants. The C. jejuni strains (99%) were resistant to triclosan, 32% were resistant to chlorhexidine, and they all were susceptible to benzalkonium chloride. The strains had low-level minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to the disinfectants P-128, Food Service Sanitizer, F-25 Sanitizer, Final Step 512 Sanitizer, OdoBan, dioctyldimethylammmonium chloride, didecyldimethylammonium chloride (C10AC), benzyldimethyldodecylammonium chloride (C12BAC), and benzyldimethyltetradecylammonium chloride (C14BAC). Intermediate MICs against DC&R, cetylpyridinium bromide hydrate, hexadecylpyridinium chloride, ethylhexadecyldimethylammonium bromide, and hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide with elevated intermediate MICs against Tek-Trol, benzyldimethylhexadecylammonium chloride, tris(hydroxylmethyl)nitromethane (THN), and formaldehyde. The highest MIC were obtained for povidone-iodine. The components THN and the benzylammonium chlorides C12BAC and C14BAC were responsible for the inhibition by DC&R. The components C10AC and C12BAC may act synergistically causing inhibition of C. jejuni by the disinfectant P-128. The formaldehyde component in DC&R was not effective against C. jejuni compared with the ammonium chloride components. Its use in disinfectants may result in additional unnecessary chemicals in the environment. Didecyldimethylammonium chloride is the most effective ammonium chloride component against C. jejuni.
Collapse
|
9
|
Beier RC, Byrd JA, Caldwell D, Andrews K, Crippen TL, Anderson RC, Nisbet DJ. Inhibition and Interactions of Campylobacter jejuni from Broiler Chicken Houses with Organic Acids. Microorganisms 2019; 7:E223. [PMID: 31366094 PMCID: PMC6722939 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7080223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Revised: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Campylobacter jejuni is a bacterium that causes major diarrheal disease worldwide and is also one of the top five foodborne pathogens encountered in the United States. Poultry is a major source of C. jejuni, and a high-risk factor for contracting campylobacteriosis. Organic acids are used in the United States during food animal processing for removal of bacterial contamination from animal carcasses. Six organic acids were evaluated in inhibition studies of 96 C. jejuni strains obtained from shoe covers used in broiler chicken houses at different poultry farms in several states by determining the susceptibilities of the C. jejuni strains, along with the pH values at the molar minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICMs). The undissociated and dissociated organic acid concentrations were calculated at the MICMs with the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation. The results for the 96 C. jejuni strains were treated similarly for each different organic acid. Campylobacter jejuni inhibition did correlate with the dissociated organic acids, but did not correlate with pH or with the undissociated organic acids. When the concentrations of dissociated organic acids decreased, the C. jejuni strains were not disinfected. A carcass wash using organic acids should have the concentration of dissociated acid species carefully controlled. It is suggested to maintain a dissociated acid concentration for propionic, l-lactic, formic, citric, butyric, and acetic acids at 24, 40, 36, 21, 23, and 25 mM, respectively, and at these dissociated organic acid levels an acid wash would be expected to remove or inhibit 97% or more of the C. jejuni bacteria studied here. However, studies must be undertaken to confirm that the suggested concentrations of dissociated organic acids are adequate to remove C. jejuni bacteria in the field vs. the laboratory. Due to propionate, l-lactate, formate, butyrate, and acetate being utilized by C. jejuni, these organic acids may not be appropriate for use as a carcass wash to remove C. jejuni surface contamination. Of all tested organic acids, dissociated citric acid was the most efficient at inhibiting C. jejuni.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ross C Beier
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, TX 77845-4988, USA.
| | - J Allen Byrd
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, TX 77845-4988, USA
| | - Denise Caldwell
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, TX 77845-4988, USA
| | - Kathleen Andrews
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, TX 77845-4988, USA
| | - Tawni L Crippen
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, TX 77845-4988, USA
| | - Robin C Anderson
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, TX 77845-4988, USA
| | - David J Nisbet
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, TX 77845-4988, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Beier RC, Harvey RB, Hernandez CA, Andrews K, Droleskey RE, Hume ME, Davidson MK, Bodeis-Jones S, Young S, Anderson RC, Nisbet DJ. Disinfectant and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Campylobacter coli Isolated in 1998 to 1999 and 2015 from Swine and Commercial Pork Chops. J Food Sci 2019; 84:1501-1512. [PMID: 31116418 DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.14622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Revised: 03/16/2019] [Accepted: 03/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Susceptibility profiles were determined for 111 Campylobacter coli strains obtained in 1998 to 1999 and 2015 from market age pigs and pork chops against 22 disinfectants and 9 antimicrobials. Resistance to tetracycline (TET) was observed in 44.4% of 1998 to 1999 strains, and the antibiotic resistance profile was TET. But strains obtained in 2015 from swine and retail pork chops had 75% TET resistance and the antibiotic resistance profile was TET, followed by azithromycin-erythromycin-TET-telithromycin-clindamycin. Antimicrobial resistance increased in 2015 strains. All strains were resistant to triclosan, and 84.1% and 95.8% of strains in 1998 to 1999 and 2015, respectively, were chlorhexidine resistant. All strains were susceptible to benzalkonium chloride. There was a shift toward higher susceptibility to chlorhexidine, triclosan, P-128, OdoBan, CPB, and CPC in 2015 swine and pork chop strains compared with 1998 to 1999 strains. The disinfectants Tek-Trol and providone-iodine, tris(hydroxylmethyl)nitromethane (THN) and formaldehyde demonstrated the highest susceptibilities. Didecyldimethylammonium chloride (C10AC) appeared to be about equally effective as benzyldimethyltetradecylammonium chloride (C14BAC) for inhibiting C. coli, and both were more effective than C8AC and C12BAC, but C16BAC was not efficient at inhibiting C. coli. The BACs, C12BAC and C14BAC, were the most effective ingredients in DC&R. Also, C12BAC and C14BAC, or these two in synergy with C10AC were responsible for inhibition of C. coli at high P-128 MICs. No cross-resistance was observed between antibiotics and disinfectants. The continued use of THN and formaldehyde in DC&R should be evaluated since these components are not effective, and their inclusion adds unwanted chemicals in the environment. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Campylobacter species cause diarrheal disease throughout the world. Disinfectants are often used on the farm, in veterinary medicine, by the food processing industry, in restaurants, and in consumer's homes. Limited information is available in the literature showing how disinfectants or disinfectant components may affect the many different foodborne pathogens, and, specifically, Campylobacter coli studied here. The knowledge generated in this study concerning the interactions of a broad array of disinfectants against C. coli may well affect the types of disinfectants and disinfectant formulations allowable for use by medical personnel, producers, food processors, restaurants, and consumers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ross C Beier
- USDA-ARS, SPARC, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, TX, 77845, USA
| | - Roger B Harvey
- USDA-ARS, SPARC, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, TX, 77845, USA
| | - Charles A Hernandez
- USDA-ARS, SPARC, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, TX, 77845, USA
| | - Kathleen Andrews
- USDA-ARS, SPARC, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, TX, 77845, USA
| | - Robert E Droleskey
- USDA-ARS, SPARC, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, TX, 77845, USA
| | - Michael E Hume
- USDA-ARS, SPARC, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, TX, 77845, USA
| | - Maureen K Davidson
- USFDA, Office of Research, CVM, 8401 Muirkirk Road, Laurel, MD, 20708, USA
| | - Sonya Bodeis-Jones
- USFDA, Office of Research, CVM, 8401 Muirkirk Road, Laurel, MD, 20708, USA
| | - Shenia Young
- USFDA, Office of Research, CVM, 8401 Muirkirk Road, Laurel, MD, 20708, USA
| | - Robin C Anderson
- USDA-ARS, SPARC, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, TX, 77845, USA
| | - David J Nisbet
- USDA-ARS, SPARC, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, TX, 77845, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Beier RC, Harvey RB, Poole TL, Hume ME, Crippen TL, Highfield LD, Alali WQ, Andrews K, Anderson RC, Nisbet DJ. Interactions of organic acids with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolated from community wastewater in Texas. J Appl Microbiol 2018; 126:480-488. [PMID: 30383327 DOI: 10.1111/jam.14145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Revised: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Investigate the interactions of organic acids (OAs), acetic, butyric, citric, formic, lactic and propionic acid against 50 Gram-positive vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) strains to determine whether pH, undissociated or dissociated acid forms correlate with bacterial inhibition. METHODS AND RESULTS Concentrations of undissociated and dissociated OAs at the molar minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICM s) of the VRE were calculated using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation. The pH at the MICM s of all VRE strains against acetic, butyric, formic and propionic acids was similar, 4·66 ± 0·07, but there was a 1·1 pH unit difference for all six OAs. Inhibition of VRE by all six OAs did not appear to be solely dependent on pH or on the undissociated OA species. The inhibition of VRE by all six dissociated acids was within Δ = 3·1 mmol l-1 . CONCLUSIONS Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium inhibition correlated with the dissociated OA species. A small decrease in the concentration of the dissociated OAs from optimum may result in allowing VRE strains to escape disinfection. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY When an OA is used to disinfect VRE strains, the concentration of the dissociated OA should be carefully controlled. A concentration of at least 20 mmol l-1 dissociated OA should be maintained when disinfecting VRE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R C Beier
- Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, TX, USA
| | - R B Harvey
- Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, TX, USA
| | - T L Poole
- Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, TX, USA
| | - M E Hume
- Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, TX, USA
| | - T L Crippen
- Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, TX, USA
| | | | - W Q Alali
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - K Andrews
- Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, TX, USA
| | - R C Anderson
- Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, TX, USA
| | - D J Nisbet
- Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Beier RC, Harvey RB, Hernandez CA, Hume ME, Andrews K, Droleskey RE, Davidson MK, Bodeis-Jones S, Young S, Duke SE, Anderson RC, Crippen TL, Poole TL, Nisbet DJ. Interactions of organic acids with Campylobacter coli from swine. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0202100. [PMID: 30096155 PMCID: PMC6086449 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 07/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Campylobacter coli is a bacterial species that is a major cause of diarrheal disease worldwide, and Campylobacter spp. are among the top 5 foodborne pathogens in the United States. During food production organic acids (OAs) are often used to remove bacteria from animal carcasses. The interactions of six OAs with 111 C. coli strains obtained from swine and retail pork chops were studied by determining the molar minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICMs) of the C. coli strains, and the pH at the MICMs. The Henderson-Hasselbalch equation was used to calculate the concentrations of the undissociated and dissociated OAs at the MICMs of the C. coli strains. The results for the 111 different C. coli strains obtained from different locations were treated as a single group for each OA since many of the C. coli strains behaved similarly to each different OA. Inhibition of C. coli was not dependent on pH or on the undissociated OA species, but C. coli inhibition correlated with the dissociated OA species. Therefore, if the concentration of the dissociated OAs decreases from optimum, one may then expect that C. coli bacteria would escape disinfection. The concentration of the dissociated OA should be carefully controlled in a carcass wash. We suggest maintaining a concentration of the dissociated acetic, butyric, citric, formic, lactic and propionic acids at 29, 23, 11, 35, 22 and 25 mM, respectively, when using a carcass wash with these OAs to remove C. coli bacteria. However, due to C. coli utilization of acetate, formate, lactate and propionate, these four OAs may not be the best choice to use for a carcass wash to remove C. coli contamination. Of the six OAs, citric acid was the most efficient at inhibiting C. coli.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ross C. Beier
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, Texas, United States of America
| | - Roger B. Harvey
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, Texas, United States of America
| | - Charles A. Hernandez
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, Texas, United States of America
| | - Michael E. Hume
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, Texas, United States of America
| | - Kathleen Andrews
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, Texas, United States of America
| | - Robert E. Droleskey
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, Texas, United States of America
| | - Maureen K. Davidson
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Office of Research, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Laurel, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Sonia Bodeis-Jones
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Office of Research, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Laurel, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Shenia Young
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Office of Research, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Laurel, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Sara E. Duke
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, Texas, United States of America
| | - Robin C. Anderson
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, Texas, United States of America
| | - Tawni L. Crippen
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, Texas, United States of America
| | - Toni L. Poole
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, Texas, United States of America
| | - David J. Nisbet
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, Texas, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Skinner BM, Rogers AT, Jacob ME. Susceptibility of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to Disinfectants In Vitro and in Simulated Footbaths Amended with Manure. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2018; 15:718-725. [PMID: 30036083 DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2018.2457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Escherichia coli O157:H7 is a human pathogen associated with gastrointestinal disease and hemolytic uremic syndrome. Direct contact with ruminants and their feces at agritourism or livestock interaction events is a known source of transmission. Footbath use is a pathogen reduction strategy that may decrease the transmission of E. coli O157:H7 at these interactions. The efficacy of chemical disinfectants in footbaths is not well reported. Our objective was to determine the susceptibility of E. coli O157:H7 toward commonly used disinfectants in vitro and within contaminated footbaths. The minimum inhibitory concentration and the minimum bactericidal concentration (MIC and MBC) and the time-to-kill were determined in vitro for seven E. coli O157:H7 strains using five disinfectant compounds (didecyldimethylammonium chloride [DDAC], glutaraldehyde, hydrogen peroxide, phenol, and sodium hypochlorite). Time-kill assays were performed within simulated footbaths at 22°C, 37°C, and 42°C with and without organic contamination using three commercial disinfectants with similar active ingredients (0.26% Clorox® Bleach, 0.034% Virex® II 256, and 1% Virkon™ S). The MBCs of disinfectants toward E. coli O157:H7 were 3.2, 625, 40, 5000, and 320 ppm of DDAC, glutaraldehyde, hydrogen peroxide, phenol, and sodium hypochlorite, respectively. At 2 × MIC, E. coli O157:H7 reached a 3 log10(colony-forming unit [CFU]/mL) reduction on contact with glutaraldehyde, by 20 min with DDAC and sodium hypochlorite, and by 4 h with phenol and hydrogen peroxide. In simulated footbaths, the commercial disinfectants reduced concentrations by 3 log10(CFU/mL) on contact in the absence of organic contamination, but viable E. coli O157:H7 was recovered from organically contaminated Clorox Bleach and Virex II 256 footbaths. No E. coli O157:H7 was recovered from the Virkon S footbaths after 10 min. This study highlights the ability for organic contamination to compromise the efficacy of disinfectants in footbaths and the importance of choosing an appropriate footbath disinfectant to retain the efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon M Skinner
- Department of Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University , Raleigh, North Carolina
| | - Anna T Rogers
- Department of Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University , Raleigh, North Carolina
| | - Megan E Jacob
- Department of Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University , Raleigh, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Um MM, Brugère H, Kérourédan M, Oswald E, Bibbal D. Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Enterohemorrhagic and Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli of Serotypes O157:H7, O26:H11, O103:H2, O111:H8, O145:H28 Compared to Escherichia coli Isolated from the Same Adult Cattle. Microb Drug Resist 2018; 24:852-859. [PMID: 29723122 DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2017.0106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the antimicrobial resistance profiles of top five enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) and enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) to E. coli isolated from the fecal flora of the same adult cattle. Previous prevalence studies had led to the isolation by immunomagnetic separation (IMS) of 39 EHEC and 80 EPEC. Seven EHEC were resistant (17.9%), and six were multidrug resistant (MDR) (15.4%). None of the top five EHEC was resistant to azithromycin. Nine EPEC O26:H11 (11.3%) were resistant. They were all resistant to tetracycline, and four were MDR (5.0%). An E. coli strain was isolated from the feces (without preselection by IMS) of 97 bovine carriers of top 5 strains. All these strains were susceptible to antibiotics. Comparative analyses did not reveal any differences between the cytotoxic activities of resistant EHEC and their susceptible counterparts or in the production of attachment and effacement lesions. These results highlighted the higher percentage of resistance of EHEC and EPEC strains compared to other E. coli. They also showed that resistance traits did not have any impact on the expression of virulence phenotypes in EHEC strains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryse Michèle Um
- 1 IRSD, Université de Toulouse , INSERM, INRA, ENVT, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | - Hubert Brugère
- 1 IRSD, Université de Toulouse , INSERM, INRA, ENVT, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | - Monique Kérourédan
- 1 IRSD, Université de Toulouse , INSERM, INRA, ENVT, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | - Eric Oswald
- 1 IRSD, Université de Toulouse , INSERM, INRA, ENVT, UPS, Toulouse, France .,2 CHU de Toulouse, Hôpital Purpan , Toulouse, France
| | - Delphine Bibbal
- 1 IRSD, Université de Toulouse , INSERM, INRA, ENVT, UPS, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chen CM, Ke SC, Li CR, Wu YC, Chen TH, Lai CH, Wu XX, Wu LT. High Diversity of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes, Class 1 Integrons, and Genotypes of Multidrug-ResistantEscherichia coliin Beef Carcasses. Microb Drug Resist 2017; 23:915-924. [DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2016.0223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Ming Chen
- Department of Health Food, Chung Chou University of Science and Technology, Changhua, Taiwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Tungs' Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Se-Chin Ke
- Infection Control Office, Tungs' Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Ru Li
- Department of Medical Research, Tungs' Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Chen Wu
- Graduate Institute of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ter-Hsin Chen
- Graduate Institute of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Ho Lai
- Institute of Basic Medical Science, School of Medicine, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Xin-Xia Wu
- Department of Microbiology, The Institute of Medical Science, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Lii-Tzu Wu
- Department of Microbiology, The Institute of Medical Science, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lajhar SA, Brownlie J, Barlow R. Survival capabilities of Escherichia coli O26 isolated from cattle and clinical sources in Australia to disinfectants, acids and antimicrobials. BMC Microbiol 2017; 17:47. [PMID: 28249570 PMCID: PMC5333398 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-017-0963-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 02/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background After E. coli O157, E. coli O26 is the second most prevalent enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) serotype identified in cases of foodborne illness in Australia and throughout the world. E. coli O26 associated foodborne outbreaks have drawn attention to the survival capabilities of this organism in a range of environments. The aim of the present study was to assess the ability of E. coli O26 to survive the effects of disinfectants, acids and antimicrobials and investigate the possible influence of virulence genes in survival and persistence of E. coli O26 from human and cattle sources from Australia. Results Initial characterization indicated that E. coli O26 are a genetically diverse group that were shown to belong to a number of pathotypes. Overall, 86.4% of isolates were susceptible to all antimicrobials tested with no significant differences in resistance observed between pathotypes. A representative subset of isolates (n = 40) were selected to determine their ability to survive disinfectants at proposed industry working concentrations and acid stress. Profoam, Kwiksan 22, and Topactive DES. were able to inhibit the growth of 100% of isolates. The remaining three disinfectants (Dairy Chlor 12.5%, Envirosan and Maxifoam) were not effective against the subset of 40 E. coli O26. Finally, elevated MICs (1,024 to 4,096 μg/ml) of acetic, propionic, lactic, and citric acids were determined for the majority of the isolates (85%). Conclusions Australian E. coli O26 isolates belong to a range of pathotypes that harbor differing virulence markers. Despite this, their response to antimicrobials, disinfectants and acids is similar confirming that stress response appears unrelated to the presence of EHEC virulence markers. Notwithstanding, the tolerance to disinfectants and the elevated acid MICs for EHEC and the other E. coli O26 pathotypes examined in this study may contribute to bacterial colonization on food contact surfaces and subsequent foodborne illness caused by this pathogen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salma A Lajhar
- School of Natural Sciences, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. .,CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. .,Present address: CSIRO Agriculture and Food, 39 Kessels Rd, Coopers Plains, QLD, 4108, Australia.
| | - Jeremy Brownlie
- School of Natural Sciences, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Robert Barlow
- CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Beier RC, Franz E, Bono JL, Mandrell RE, Fratamico PM, Callaway TR, Andrews K, Poole TL, Crippen TL, Sheffield CL, Anderson RC, Nisbet DJ. Disinfectant and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of the Big Six Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Strains from Food Animals and Humans. J Food Prot 2016; 79:1355-70. [PMID: 27497123 DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The disinfectant and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of 138 non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains (STECs) from food animals and humans were determined. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) was moderate (39.1% of strains) in response to 15 antimicrobial agents. Animal strains had a lower AMR prevalence (35.6%) than did human strains (43.9%) but a higher prevalence of the resistance profile GEN-KAN-TET. A decreasing prevalence of AMR was found among animal strains from serogroups O45 > O145 > O121 > O111 > O26 > O103 and among human strains from serogroups O145 > O103 > O26 > O111 > O121 > O45. One animal strain from serogroups O121 and O145 and one human strain from serogroup O26 had extensive drug resistance. A high prevalence of AMR in animal O45 and O121 strains and no resistance or a low prevalence of resistance in human strains from these serogroups suggests a source other than food animals for human exposure to these strains. Among the 24 disinfectants evaluated, all strains were susceptible to triclosan. Animal strains had a higher prevalence of resistance to chlorhexidine than did human strains. Both animal and human strains had a similar low prevalence of low-level benzalkonium chloride resistance, and animal and human strains had similar susceptibility profiles for most other disinfectants. Benzyldimethylammonium chlorides and C10AC were the primary active components in disinfectants DC&R and P-128, respectively, against non-O157 STECs. A disinfectant FS512 MIC ≥ 8 μg/ml was more prevalent among animal O121 strains (61.5%) than among human O121 strains (25%), which may also suggest a source of human exposure to STEC O121 other than food animals. Bacterial inhibition was not dependent solely on pH but was correlated with the presence of dissociated organic acid species and some undissociated acids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ross C Beier
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, Texas 77845, USA.
| | - Eelco Franz
- Laboratory for Zoonoses and Environmental Microbiology, Centre for Infectious Disease Control Netherlands, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - James L Bono
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska 68933, USA
| | - Robert E Mandrell
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Western Regional Research Center, Albany, California 94710, USA
| | - Pina M Fratamico
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania 19038, USA
| | - Todd R Callaway
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, Texas 77845, USA
| | - Kathleen Andrews
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, Texas 77845, USA
| | - Toni L Poole
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, Texas 77845, USA
| | - Tawni L Crippen
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, Texas 77845, USA
| | - Cynthia L Sheffield
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, Texas 77845, USA
| | - Robin C Anderson
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, Texas 77845, USA
| | - David J Nisbet
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, Texas 77845, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
McConnel CS, Stenkamp-Strahm CM, Rao S, Linke LM, Magnuson RJ, Hyatt DR. Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles in Escherichia coli O157 Isolates from Northern Colorado Dairies. J Food Prot 2016; 79:484-7. [PMID: 26939660 PMCID: PMC8641561 DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Escherichia coli O157 (EcO157) infections can lead to serious disease and death in humans. Although the ecology of EcO157 is complex, ruminant animals serve as an important reservoir for human infection. Dairy cattle are unique because they may be a source of contamination for milk, meat, and manure-fertilized crops. Foodborne dairy pathogens such as EcO157 are of primary importance to public health. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a complex phenomenon that complicates the treatment of serious bacterial infections and is of increasing concern. In the face of recommended use restrictions for antimicrobial agents in livestock operations, current AMR patterns in known foodborne pathogens should be documented. The objective of this study was to document AMR patterns in EcO157 isolates from dairies in northern Colorado using antimicrobial agents commonly found on dairies and representative of medically important antimicrobial drug classes. Seventy-five EcO157 isolates were recovered from three dairies. Six isolates were resistant to at least 1 of the 10 tested antimicrobial agents: four were resistant to streptomycin, sulfisoxazole, and tetracycline; one was resistant to streptomycin and tetracycline; and one was resistant to only tetracycline. All resistant isolates were from a single dairy. Overall, a low prevalence (8%) of AMR was observed among the 75 EcO157 isolates. No significant effects on AMR profiles due to virulence genes, parity, or previous antimicrobial treatments within the current lactation period were detected. The results of this study provide background information for future comparative studies investigating AMR trends. Future studies should include more participating farms and more samples and should control for potential confounding factors of AMR that may underlie individual farm variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig S McConnel
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA.
| | - Chloe M Stenkamp-Strahm
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA
| | - Sangeeta Rao
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA
| | - Lyndsey M Linke
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA
| | - Roberta J Magnuson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA
| | - Doreene R Hyatt
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Beier R, Foley S, Davidson M, White D, McDermott P, Bodeis-Jones S, Zhao S, Andrews K, Crippen T, Sheffield C, Poole T, Anderson R, Nisbet D. Characterization of antibiotic and disinfectant susceptibility profiles among Pseudomonas aeruginosa
veterinary isolates recovered during 1994-2003. J Appl Microbiol 2014; 118:326-42. [DOI: 10.1111/jam.12707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2014] [Revised: 11/06/2014] [Accepted: 11/14/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- R.C. Beier
- Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center; Agricultural Research Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture; College Station TX USA
| | - S.L. Foley
- Division of Microbiology, National Center for Toxicological Research; U.S. Food and Drug Administration; Jefferson AR USA
| | - M.K. Davidson
- Office of Research; Center for Veterinary Medicine; U.S. Food and Drug Administration; Laurel MD USA
| | - D.G. White
- Office of Research; Center for Veterinary Medicine; U.S. Food and Drug Administration; Laurel MD USA
| | - P.F. McDermott
- Office of Research; Center for Veterinary Medicine; U.S. Food and Drug Administration; Laurel MD USA
| | - S. Bodeis-Jones
- Office of Research; Center for Veterinary Medicine; U.S. Food and Drug Administration; Laurel MD USA
| | - S. Zhao
- Office of Research; Center for Veterinary Medicine; U.S. Food and Drug Administration; Laurel MD USA
| | - K. Andrews
- Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center; Agricultural Research Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture; College Station TX USA
| | - T.L. Crippen
- Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center; Agricultural Research Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture; College Station TX USA
| | - C.L. Sheffield
- Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center; Agricultural Research Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture; College Station TX USA
| | - T.L. Poole
- Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center; Agricultural Research Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture; College Station TX USA
| | - R.C. Anderson
- Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center; Agricultural Research Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture; College Station TX USA
| | - D.J. Nisbet
- Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center; Agricultural Research Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture; College Station TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
|