Intraocular Pressure rise after Anti-VEGF Treatment: Prevalence, Possible Mechanisms and Correlations

Identifiable Historic and Observable Factors May Predict Progression to Exfoliation Glaucoma in Newly Diagnosed Exfoliation Patients

OBJECTIVE

To identify clinical factors associated with conversion to exfoliation glaucoma (XFG) in exfoliation syndrome (XFS) patients who are most at risk of progression to XFG within 3 years for increased surveillance and early preventive interventions.

DESIGN

A retrospective patient cohort study design was employed.

SUBJECTS

A source population of XFS patients ≥ 50 years was identified from electronic medical records in the Utah Population Database. From this, 487 study patients with one or more dilated eye examinations before chart-confirmed XFS onset in 2011 or later and ≥ 3 years of subsequent eye examinations were selected for study.

METHODS

We implemented binomial linear mixed models with L1-penalized estimation to select variables associated with conversion. Models included a random intercept to account for within-patient correlation for eye-level data. Candidate demographic, lifestyle, systemic, and ocular comorbidities data were obtained, and diagnoses were categorized as binary (history or no history). These potential factors between conversion and nonconversion patients were used in model selection of variables jointly predictive of conversion. Odds ratios and confidence intervals were calculated using the link logit.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

To determine the main outcome of conversion to XFG following an index diagnosis of XFS compared with nonconversion within 3 years, clinical records of each subject's left and right eyes were assessed to confirm XFS and date of onset and date of XFG onset, if conversion occurred. Clinical measurements (e.g., intraocular pressure [IOP], cup-to-disc ratio, provider notes, and IOP-lowering procedures and medications) were used to corroborate conversion status.

RESULTS

Eighteen variables jointly predicted XFG conversion within 3 years correctly in 71% of patient eyes. The odds of conversion were the highest for exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD), 2.3-fold (P = 0.004). Other predictive variables included nonexudative AMD (P = 0.05), primary open angle glaucoma (P < 0.001), obstructive sleep apnea (P = 0.03), and ocular hypertension (P = 0.003) diagnosed before XFS onset.

CONCLUSIONS

We determined a set of clinically relevant factors that predicted which newly diagnosed XFS patients progressed to XFG within 3 years. A planned validation will independently confirm if these prognostic indicators hold promise in other settings.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Real-world analysis of medications inducing meibomian gland dysfunction: based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database

BACKGROUND

Dry eye syndrome (DES) significantly affects quality of life. Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) is a primary contributor to DES and may be drug-induced.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This study analyzed data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) between January 2004 and September 2023 using the Ratio of Odds Ratios (ROR) and Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) to detect potential drug-induced MGD signals. Drugs were categorized by therapeutic class.

RESULTS

Among 289 MGD cases, the average patient age was 51.69 years, with 65.44% female. MGD reports have increased over time, peaking in 2023, primarily from the United States and Europe. Of 148 drugs, nine showed significant associations with MGD, including those in ophthalmology, oncology, immunomodulation, dermatology, and the urogenital system.

CONCLUSION

This real-world study identifies drugs potentially linked to MGD, offering valuable insights for drug safety surveillance. These findings support the development of pharmacovigilance strategies and optimized clinical practice to mitigate ocular risks.

Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of Anti-VEGF Drugs for the Management of Diabetic Retinopathy: An Overview

The discovery of antivascular endothelial growth factor medications has resulted in a substantial change in diabetic retinopathy treatment. The most common cause of diabetic retinopathy blindness is Diabetic Macular Edema. The pathophysiology of Diabetic Macular Edema is thought to include the well-known pro-angiogenic and pro-permeability factor vascular endothelial growth factor. Over the past decade, drugs that impede the functions of vascular endothelial growth factors have established themselves as a standard-of-care treatment for a range of ocular ailments and improved patients' clinical results with diabetic retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema, and their frequency has grown exponentially with the introduction of these agents Pegaptanib, Ranibizumab, and Aflibercept which are approved for ophthalmic indications, while Bevacizumab is used off-label. These medications delivered intravitreally have halted the vascular development of diabetic retinopathy. Various randomized trials have proven that antivascular endothelial growth factor medication is safe and effective in preserving vision. Following an extensive period of preclinical development aimed at enhancing and defining its biological impacts, these drugs were shown in clinical trials to be effective in treating diabetic retinopathy and other ophthalmic conditions. Data from various sources suggest that Pegaptanib, Ranibizumab, and Aflibercept are costly, while Bevacizumab is cost-effective, and in low and middle-income nations, it is thus a desirable therapy choice. However, issues with compounding, counterfeiting, and off-label usage restrict its availability in many nations. The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, adverse effects, and contraindications of antivascular endothelial growth factor agents are discussed, and the results of clinical trials evaluating their efficacy are summarized.

Evaluation of Sustained Intraocular Pressure Elevations Across Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents on the development of sustained intraocular pressure (IOP) elevations. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included eyes receiving anti-VEGF injections for various indications along with nontreated fellow eyes from 2012 to 2022. Patients were grouped according to treatment with bevacizumab, ranibizumab, or aflibercept. Trends in IOP were recorded after treatment initiation for 1 year. The development of sustained IOP elevations (defined as an increase of 5 mm Hg or greater than baseline for 4 or more weeks) and glaucoma manifestations were recorded. Results: The analysis included 1604 eyes (injection cohort, 907; control cohort, 697). The mean age of the injection cohort was 83.3 years; 56.9% were women and 82.0% were White. Injections were for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (498 [54.9%]), diabetic retinopathy (219 [24.1%]), retinal vein occlusion (161 [17.8%]), and other indications (29 [3.2%)]. Bevacizumab was used in 521 eyes (57.4%), ranibizumab in 129 eyes (14.2%), and aflibercept in 257 eyes (28.3%). The mean age in the control cohort was 81.6 years; 56.1% were women and 84.1% were White. Sustained IOP elevations developed in 97 (6.0%) of 1604 eyes throughout the study. Compared with controls, treated eyes overall did not have an increased rate of sustained IOP elevations (P = .38) or glaucoma progression (P = .51), although patients treated with bevacizumab had a significantly greater incidence of IOP elevation than controls (relative risk, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.18-2.78). The mean number of injections to sustained IOP elevation was 5.4 and did not differ between agents (P > .05). Conclusions: Although not all anti-VEGF agents are associated with IOP-related adverse effects, bevacizumab carries an increased risk for sustained IOP elevation. Further investigation into the long-term effects of bevacizumab on IOP and glaucoma and a comparison with other anti-VEGF agents may be warranted.

Exploring the Spectrum of VEGF Inhibitors' Toxicities from Systemic to Intra-Vitreal Usage in Medical Practice

The use of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor inhibitors (VEGFi) has become prevalent in the field of medicine, given the high incidence of various pathological conditions necessitating VEGF inhibition within the general population. These conditions encompass a range of advanced neoplasms, such as colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cancer, ovarian cancer, and others, along with ocular diseases. The utilization of VEGFi is not without potential risks and adverse effects, requiring healthcare providers to be well-prepared for identification and management. VEGFi can be broadly categorized into two groups: antibodies or chimeric proteins that specifically target VEGF (bevacizumab, ramucirumab, aflibercept, ranibizumab, and brolucizumab) and non-selective and selective small molecules (sunitinib, sorafenib, cabozantinib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, etc.) designed to impede intracellular signaling of the VEGF receptor (RTKi, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors). The presentation and mechanisms of adverse effects resulting from VEGFi depend primarily on this distinction and the route of drug administration (systemic or intra-vitreal). This review provides a thorough examination of the causes, recognition, management, and preventive strategies for VEGFi toxicities with the goal of offering support to oncologists in both clinical practice and the design of clinical trials.

VIVEX: A Formula for Calculating Individual Vitreous Volume: A New Approach Towards Tailored Patient Dosing Regime in Intravitreal Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Personalized medicine and patient-tailored drug dosing have been substantiated through thousands of clinical studies, demonstrating their safety and efficacy. The principle: "as much as necessary, as little as possible" is widely spread. Quantities and doses are therefore adjusted individually. This is not the case for intravitreal injections in the context of retinal diseases. Intravitreal injections are not adjusted in relation to the vitreous volume. The vitreous body is described as "approx. 4 cm3" in the literature.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we included 72 eyes of patients who had undergone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the orbit and biometry measurements of the anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length. After segmentation of the volume data, the vitreous volume was extracted by voxel integration, and a simple prediction model was derived to determine the vitreous volume from the axial length (AL) measurement with AL3·π/6·(0.76 + 0.012·(AL-24). This is the volume of a sphere AL3·π/6 and a correction term 0.76 + 0.012·(AL-24) to account for the portion of the vitreous in the entire globe and the proportional increase of the vitreous portion for long (myopic) eyes.

RESULTS

Emmetropic eyes with an axial length of 22.50-23.50 mm had a vitreous volume of around 4.5-5.5 cm3. Myopic eyes with an axial length of 30.00 mm had a calculated vitreous volume of 9.0-10.0 cm3. Hypermetropic eyes with an axial length of 20.00 mm showed a vitreous volume of 3.0-4.0 cm3.

CONCLUSIONS

By implementing the new calculation formula on the IOLCON website, it will be easy to get the exact individual vitreous volume. The data could be used by retinal surgeons prior to surgery. The knowledge of anatomical dimensions and exact individual vitreous volume seems to be important for gas and silicone oil fillings. With the newly derived knowledge, multicentric studies can evaluate the impact of the dose in intravitreal therapies. Patient-tailored dosing could prevent side effects and improve effectiveness.

Effect of Prefilled vs Vial-Drawn Syringes on Sustained Increases in Intraocular Pressure in Patients Treated With Aflibercept

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of syringe type on developing sustained intraocular pressure (IOP) increases. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients in a single academic center receiving antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections from 2012 to 2022 for various indications. Patients were grouped by anti-VEGF treatment of either vial-drawn or prefilled syringe delivery. Trends in IOP were recorded for 1 year after treatment began. Development of sustained IOP increase, ocular hypertension, and glaucoma was recorded. Sustained IOP increase was defined as ≥5 mm Hg above baseline for at least 4 weeks. Results: Of 257 total patients, 6 (2.3%) developed sustained IOP increases throughout the study's duration. No significant differences were noted with respect to prefilled versus vial-drawn syringe status on the development of sustained IOP increases or incident glaucoma (IOP: 1.8% vs 2.7%, respectively, P = .65; glaucoma: 0.0% vs 2.0%, respectively, P = .14). Patients treated with prefilled syringes were significantly less likely to develop ocular hypertension (2.8% vs 8.8%, P < .05). Conclusions: This study found that aflibercept intravitreal injection with prefilled syringes was not associated with a significant increase in IOP-related adverse effects when compared with those treated with vial-drawn syringes.

Exploring the Relationship between Anti-VEGF Therapy and Glaucoma: Implications for Management Strategies

A short-term increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) is a common side effect after intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy, but a sustained increase in IOP with the development of secondary glaucoma has also been reported in some studies after repeated intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. The aim of this review is to present and discuss the possible pathophysiological mechanisms and factors contributing to a sustained rise in IOP, as well as treatment strategies for patients at risk. Close monitoring and adjustable IOP-lowering treatment are recommended for high-risk patients, including those with glaucoma, angle-closure anomalies, ocular hypertension or family history of glaucoma; patients receiving a high number of injections or at shorter intervals; and patients with capsulotomy. Strategies are needed to identify patients at risk in a timely manner and to prevent sustained elevation of IOP.

Immediate Rise in Intraocular Pressure After First-Time Intravitreal Injection of Bevacizumab

Objective This study aims to report an immediate change in intraocular pressure (IOP) after the first injection of bevacizumab. Materials and methods An interventional case series was carried out at Isra Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Al-Ibrahim Eye Hospital, Karachi, from November 2018 to April 2020. All patients with various chorioretinal diseases requiring anti-VEGF treatment were included in the study. Patients with a history of previous anti-VEGF or steroid injections and personal or family history of glaucoma were excluded. Bevacizumab in a dose of 1.25 mg (0.05 ml) was injected intravitreally under topical anesthesia maintaining sterile aseptic conditions in the operating room. IOP was checked one hour prior to the injection, and hourly monitoring of it was continued for the next six hours. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics to compare the mean IOP readings before and after injection. Results A total of 191 eyes of 147 patients were included in the study. Among them, 92 (62.58%) were male and 55 (37.41%) were female with a mean age of 45.5 ± 8.8 years. The mean pre-injection IOP was measured as 12.12 ± 2.11 mmHg. The frequency of IOP elevation of ˃ 21 mmHg was observed in 169 (88.5%) eyes at five minutes, 104 (54.5%) eyes at 30 minutes, 33 (17.3%) eyes at one hour, and 16 (8.4%) eyes at two hours. The raised mean post-operative IOP was 30.44 ± 6.53 mmHg at five minutes, 26.27 ± 4.65 mmHg at 30 minutes, 26.12 ± 3.31 mmHg at one hour, and 25.63 ± 3.03 mmHg at two hours. The IOP reduced to pre-injection value at three hours measuring 12.12 ± 2.11 mmHg and continued to stay at that level for the next three hours. Conclusions The majority of the eyes receiving first-time intravitreal bevacizumab injection showed a significant increase in IOP level within five minutes to two hours post-injection.

Ocular Safety and Toxicokinetics of Bevacizumab-bvzr (Zirabev), a Bevacizumab Biosimilar, Administered to Cynomolgus Monkeys by Intravitreal Injection

Purpose: Bevacizumab-bvzr (Zirabev®), a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and a biosimilar to bevacizumab, is approved for intravenous administration for various indications worldwide. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the ocular toxicity, systemic tolerability, and toxicokinetics (TKs) of bevacizumab-bvzr following repeat intravitreal (IVT) injection to cynomolgus monkeys. Methods: Male monkeys were administered saline, vehicle, or bevacizumab-bvzr at 1.25 mg/eye/dose once every 2 weeks (3 doses total) for 1 month by bilateral IVT injection, followed by a 4-week recovery phase to evaluate the reversibility of any findings. Local and systemic safety was assessed. Ocular safety assessments included in-life ophthalmic examinations, tonometry (intraocular pressure, IOP), electroretinograms (ERGs), and histopathology. In addition, concentrations of bevacizumab-bvzr were measured in serum and in ocular tissues (vitreous humor, retina, and choroid/retinal pigment epithelium) and ocular concentration-time profiles and serum TKs were evaluated. Results: Bevacizumab-bvzr was tolerated locally and systemically, with an ocular safety profile comparable to the saline or vehicle control group. Bevacizumab-bvzr was observed in both serum and in the evaluated ocular tissues. There were no bevacizumab-bvzr-related microscopic changes or effects on IOP or ERGs. Bevacizumab-bvzr-related trace pigment or cells in vitreous humor (in 4 of 12 animals; commonly associated with IVT injection) and transient, nonadverse, mild ocular inflammation (in 1 of 12 animals) were noted upon ophthalmic examination and fully reversed during the recovery phase. Conclusions: Bevacizumab-bvzr was well tolerated via biweekly IVT administration in healthy monkeys, with an ocular safety profile comparable to saline or its vehicle control.

Risk, Prevalence, and Progression of Glaucoma in Eyes With Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treated With Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections

PURPOSE

To examine the risk, prevalence, and progression of glaucoma development in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) eyes receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections compared to controls.

DESIGN

Retrospective clinical cohort study.

METHODS

Retrospective review of eyes receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF injections from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2013, for exudative AMD. Age- and sex-matched control groups of eyes included eyes with nonexudative AMD (NEAMD) and no AMD. Eyes with a diagnosis of glaucoma or glaucoma suspect were reviewed for injection details, type and date of glaucoma diagnosis, glaucoma treatments, standard automated perimetry (SAP), and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Qualitative progression was determined by indication of glaucoma progression in provider notes. Quantitative progression was assessed based on change in mean deviation (MD) on SAP, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness on SD-OCT, and intraocular pressure (IOP).

RESULTS

There were 707 eyes of 504 patients treated with anti-VEGF injections and 1008 eyes in the NEAMD and no-AMD cohorts. There was no difference in glaucoma or suspect prevalence at initial presentation between eyes treated with injections and NEAMD (6.9% vs 9.7%, P = .22) or no-AMD controls (vs 8.5%, P = .55). There was no difference in cumulative 5-year probability of new glaucoma diagnosis after anti-VEGF injections compared to NEAMD (1.9% vs 1.0%, P = .69) or no-AMD controls (vs 1.6%, P = .88). There was no difference in qualitative progression of glaucoma in the injection cohort vs NEAMD (P = .19) or no-AMD controls (P = .61). The rate of MD change in injection eyes was similar to NEAMD eyes (P = .74) but greater than no-AMD eyes (P = .02). Eyes receiving injections required more topical glaucoma medications compared with NEAMD (P = .03) and more glaucoma laser treatments compared with no-AMD controls (P = .009). Eyes receiving injections did not require more frequent incisional glaucoma surgery compared with NEAMD (21.0% vs 15.0%, P = .95) or no-AMD controls (vs 10.0%, P = .10).

CONCLUSION

Eyes treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for exudative AMD did not have increased risk of developing glaucoma compared with controls. Of those with a glaucoma diagnosis, exudative AMD eyes receiving injections required a greater number of topical glaucoma medications compared with NEAMD eyes and had a greater rate of MD loss than no-AMD controls.

Frequency and Symptoms of Intravitreal Silicone Oil Droplets Following Becton Dickinson and Norm-Ject Bevacizumab Injections

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To determine silicone oil droplet frequency and symptomatic impact in patients injected with Norm-Ject (NJ) and/or Becton Dickinson (BD) intravitreal bevacizumab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 426 patients with prior bevacizumab injection(s). Symptomatic floaters questionnaire responses were compiled and statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact t test with 95% CI calculated via the modified Wald method.

RESULTS

Patients who received BD intravitreal bevacizumab showed more droplets (67.2%) than those who received NJ intravitreal bevacizumab (7.8%), and droplets increased with injection quantity. However, the symptomatic patients reporting new floaters were similar (NJ: 39.22%, BD: 39.47%). [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2022;53:108-112.].

Evaluation of the Effect of Garlic Tablet as a Complementary Treatment for Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of garlic (Allium sativum L.) tablets as a complimentary herbal medication in diabetic macular edema.

METHODS

A total of 91 diabetic participants (117 eyes) with central involved macular edema underwent a double-blind randomized trial. The patients used garlic tablets (500 mg) (2 tab/day) or placebo for 4 weeks and subsequently were examined by an expert ophthalmologist. Clinical manifestations including the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), central macular thickness (CMT, μm), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured as the main outcomes.

RESULTS

BCVA was significantly improved by a 0.18 decrease in mean logMAR value in the garlic-treated patients in comparison with 0.06 in the control ones (P value = 0.027). CMT was decreased in both groups by a 102.99 μm decrease in the garlic group compared to 52.67 μm in the placebo group, albeit in a nonsignificant manner (P value: 0.094). IOP was decreased in the garlic group by 1.03 mmHg (P value: 0.024) and increased by 0.3 mmHg (P value: 0.468) in the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

Our trial suggests that garlic supplements can improve visual acuity, decrease the CMT and lower the IOP, and can be considered as an adjuvant treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema. Garlic was satisfactorily tolerated in diabetic patients, and no significant adverse effect interrupting the safety profile was observed.

Intraocular pressure effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection for aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of 0.0125 mL and 0.025 mL doses of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection on intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes with aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, charts of 52 eyes of 26 consecutive infants were reviewed. The patients received 0.0125 mL (Group 1) or 0.025 mL (Group 2) anti-VEGF agents' intravitreally. The IOP was measured before injection, on the first day, during the first week, and in the first month. After each injection, optic nerve head perfusion was evaluated by a binocular indirect ophthalmoscope. IOP values, complications, use of antiglaucomatous drops, and the effects of anti-VEGF drugs were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean baseline IOP before injection was 16.0 ± 3.7 mmHg for Group 1 and 15.5 ± 4.5 mmHg for Group 2 (p = 0.365). The mean value of IOP on the first day was statistically increased in Group 2 (29.2 ± 6.1 mmHg) compared with Group 1 (24.1 ± 6.8 mmHg) (p = 0.013). Moreover, antiglaucomatous drops were needed in 12 eyes for Group 2 compared with seven eyes for Group 1. Anterior chamber paracentesis was not performed after any of the injections.

CONCLUSION

This study found that IOP increases after intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents for the treatment of ROP. The injection of 0.025 mL anti-VEGF agents increases IOP more than the 0.0125 mL injection in the treatment of infants with aggressive posterior ROP.

Intraocular pressure and injection forces during intravitreal injection into enucleated porcine eyes

Injection of biological molecules into the intravitreous humor is of increasing interest for the treatment of posterior segment eye diseases such as age-related degenerative macular degeneration. The injection volume is limited by an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) and 50-100 µL are typically used for most intravitreally (IVT) applied commercial products. Direct measurement of IOP is difficult and has not been studied dependent on solution properties and injection rates. We used an instrumental set-up to study IOP ex vivo using healthy enucleated porcine eyes. IOP was determined as a function of injection volume for viscosities between 1 and 100 mPas, injection rates of 0.1, 1, and 1.5 mL/min, and needle length and diameter (27/30G and 0.5/0.75″) using Dextran solutions. IOP increased exponentially for injection volumes larger than 100 µL. We did not observe differences in IOP dependent on viscosity, injection rate, and needle diameter. However, variability increased significantly for injection volumes larger than 100 µL and, unexpectedly, declined with higher viscosities. We demonstrate that the exponential increase in IOP is not reflected by injection force measurements for typical configurations that are used for IVT application. The present findings may guide injection volumes for intravitreal injection and inform injection force considerations during technical drug product development.

Comparison between two intravitreal injection techniques with respect to fluid reflux, intraocular pressure, and therapeutic effect

CONTEXT:

Effect of fluid reflux on intraocular pressure (IOP) and therapeutic benefits.

AIMS:

The aim of this study is to compare two intravitreal injection techniques in terms of fluid reflux, short-term IOP changes, and therapeutic effect.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN:

A prospective, double-blinded, randomized interventional study.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS:

Sixty eyes were randomly allocated to two groups (direct intravitreal injection technique and oblique intravitreal injection technique). IOP was measured before and immediately after the injection of 0.1 ml comprising of bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 ml) and dexamethasone (0.2 mg/0.05 ml) and then at 30 min after the injection. Occurrence and amount of vitreous reflux were recorded. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were assessed preinjection and 6 weeks postinjection.

RESULTS:

IOP (mmHg ± standard deviation) increased significantly immediately after injection to 24.30 ± 3.02 (direct intravitreal injection) and 31.50 ± 3.49 (oblique intravitreal injection). These pressure rise differed significantly between both groups (mean difference: 7.2, P < 0.0001). Thirty minutes after injection, there was no significant difference in IOP increase between the groups. Occurrence and amount of fluid reflux were significantly higher with direct intravitreal injection. There was no significant difference in BCVA and CMT outcome between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Direct intravitreal injection technique has lower rise in IOP and higher incidence of fluid reflux than the oblique intravitreal technique. Fluid reflux does not cause a therapeutic compromise in terms of BCVA or CMT changes, so the reflux fluid must be the vitreous not the drug. Thus, direct injection technique seems to be the preferred technique.

Current intravitreal therapy and ocular hypertension: A review

To determine the effect of commonly used intravitreal agents on immediate and long-term IOP elevations and their association, if any, with glaucoma. Literature searches in PubMed and the Cochrane databased in January 2020 yielded 407 individual articles. Of these, 87 were selected for review based on our inclusion criteria. Based on the evidence provided, 20 were assigned level I, 27 level II, and 22 level III. Eight articles were rejected because of poor quality, insufficient clarity, or irrelevance based on standardized protocols set out by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. The studies that reported on short-term IOP elevation (i.e., between 0 and 60 min) showed that an immediate increase in IOP is seen in all patients who receive anti-VEGF agents or triamcinolone acetonide when measured between 0 and 30 min of intravitreal injection and that the IOP elevation decreases over time. The data on long-term IOP elevation were mixed; Pretreatment with glaucoma medications, anterior chamber tap, vitreous reflux, longer intervals between injections, and longer axial lengths were associated with lower IOP elevations after injection of anti-VEGF agents, while the position of the implant vis-à-vis, the anterior chamber was important for steroid therapy. Data were mixed on the relationship between IOP increase and the type of intravitreal injection, number of intravitreal injections, preexisting glaucoma, and globe decompression before injection. There were no data on the onset or progression of glaucoma in the studies reviewed in this assessment. However, some studies demonstrated RNFL thinning in patients receiving chronic anti-VEGF therapy. Most, if not all, intravitreal agents cause ocular hypertension, both in the short term and long term. The functional consequences of these observations are not very clear.

Creating an Ocular Biofactory: Surgical Approaches in Gene Therapy for Acquired Retinal Diseases

ABSTRACT

Gene therapy offers the potential to treat inherited retinal disorders and deliver sustained therapy for acquired retinal diseases. In the latter case, host cells can be harnessed to produce non-native proteins that have beneficial properties, such as antivascular endothelial growth factor activity, transforming the eye into an ocular "biofactory." Several gene therapy programs have entered clinical testing for delivery to the vitreous, subretinal, and suprachoroidal space. Improved viral vectors and refined surgical techniques are critical to successful delivery of therapeutic products to the target tissue. In this review, we discuss the development of gene therapy products aimed at acquired retinal diseases and the surgical techniques utilized to achieve targeted delivery.

Williams G, Brocchini S, Awwad S. Injectables and Depots to Prolong Drug Action of Proteins and Peptides

Proteins and peptides have emerged in recent years to treat a wide range of multifaceted diseases such as cancer, diabetes and inflammation. The emergence of polypeptides has yielded advancements in the fields of biopharmaceutical production and formulation. Polypeptides often display poor pharmacokinetics, limited permeability across biological barriers, suboptimal biodistribution, and some proclivity for immunogenicity. Frequent administration of polypeptides is generally required to maintain adequate therapeutic levels, which can limit efficacy and compliance while increasing adverse reactions. Many strategies to increase the duration of action of therapeutic polypeptides have been described with many clinical products having been developed. This review describes approaches to optimise polypeptide delivery organised by the commonly used routes of administration. Future innovations in formulation may hold the key to the continued successful development of proteins and peptides with optimal clinical properties.

"Glaucomatous fields" after monthly intravitreal injections: Normal tension glaucoma or a mimicker?

Purpose

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections, while used to effectively treat numerous retinal vascular conditions, can be associated with transient and prolonged ocular hypertension. There is minimal literature detailing the development of normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) following intravitreal anti-VEGF injections.

Observations

A 38-year-old Caucasian male with no medical or ocular history was diagnosed with an inferior HRVO with macular edema in the left eye. The patient received a total of eleven monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections over one year, with maintenance of stable vision and intraocular pressure (IOP) throughout the treatment period and during follow-up. Nine months after the last aflibercept injection, cup-to-disc asymmetry, inferior thinning of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and reduced superior visual field was evident in the left eye. Clinically, the patient was consistent with normal tension glaucoma and thus, the patient was started on daily timolol drops; however, the role of the glaucomatous findings being secondary to repeated injection-related IOP elevations is possible.

Conclusions and Importance

While the clinical features based on visual fields and RNFL thinning with unmedicated normotensive IOP may suggest NTG in a patient, this clinical presentation may be a masquerader of NTG with the etiology of the glaucoma optic neuropathy caused by cumulative impact of transient IOP elevations secondary to intravitreal injections.

Diabetic Macular Edema Management in Asian Population: Expert Panel Consensus Guidelines

PURPOSE

The aim of this consensus article was to provide comprehensive recommendations in the management of diabetic macular edema (DME) by reviewing recent clinical evidence.

DESIGN

A questionnaire containing 47 questions was developed which encompassed clinical scenarios such as treatment response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and steroid, treatment side effects, as well as cost and compliance/reimbursement in the management of DME using a Dephi questionnaire as guide.

METHODS

An expert panel of 12 retinal specialists from Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, India and Vietnam responded to this questionnaire on two separate occasions. The first round responses were compiled, analyzed and discussed in a round table discussion where a consensus was sought through voting. Consensus was considered achieved, when 9 of the 12 panellists (75%) agreed on a recommendation.

RESULTS

The DME patients were initially profiled based on their response to treatment, and the terms target response, adequate response, nonresponse, and inadequate response were defined. The panellists arrived at a consensus on various aspects of DME treatment such as need for classification of patients before treatment, first-line treatment options, appropriate time to switch between treatment modalities, and steroid-related side effects based on which recommendations were derived, and a treatment algorithm was developed.

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus article provides comprehensive, evidence-based treatment guidelines in the management of DME in Asian population. In addition, it also provides recommendations on other aspects of DME management such as steroid treatment for stable glaucoma patients, management of intraocular pressure rise, and recommendations for cataract development.

A Multicenter, Retrospective Study (RE-ENACT 2) on Razumab™ (World's First Biosimilar Ranibizumab) in Retinal Vein Occlusion

Purpose

The REal life assessmENt of safety And effeCTiveness of Razumab 2 (RE-ENACT 2) study evaluated the long-term effectiveness of biosimilar ranibizumab. We present the subgroup analysis of patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

Methods

Data of patients who received pro re nata (PRN) biosimilar ranibizumab (November 2015 to December 2018, 17 centers) were analyzed. Endpoints were change from baseline in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, Snellen’s/logMAR), central subfield thickness (CSFT), intraocular pressure (IOP), and proportions of patients having intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 30, 36, and 48.

Results

Of 101 patients, 48.51% were men, and the majority (79.21%) were treatment naïve and had received 3 (range 1–5) injections (53.5%). Significant improvements (P < 0.05) were observed from baseline to all timepoints for BCVA [baseline, 0.89 ± 0.06 (n = 94); week 48, 0.41 ± 0.08 (n = 14)] and CSFT [baseline, 527.58 ± 19.9 (n = 85); week 48, 307.47 ± 16.4 (n = 15)]. Changes in IOP (mmHg) were non-significant [baseline, 15.38 ± 0.4 (n = 94); week 48, 13.94 ± 0.6 (n = 16); P = 0.5575). Proportions of patients having IRF [baseline, 71.3% (n = 84) vs week 48, 0% (n = 15)] and SRF [baseline, 52.5% (n = 83) vs week 48, 0% (n = 15)] were decreased. Similar results for BCVA, CSFT, IOP, IRF, and SRF were observed for BRVO and CRVO subgroups. There were no new safety concerns.

Conclusions

Biosimilar ranibizumab demonstrated improvements in visual acuity and disease outcomes up to 48 weeks in patients with RVO without any new safety concerns.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40123-020-00277-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Correlation of ocular rigidity with intraocular pressure spike after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in exudative retinal disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To evaluate the non-invasive measurement of ocular rigidity (OR), an important biomechanical property of the eye, as a predictor of intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) intravitreal injection (IVI).

METHODS

Subjects requiring IVI of anti-VEGF for a pre-existing retinal condition were enrolled in this prospective cross-sectional study. OR was assessed in 18 eyes of 18 participants by measurement of pulsatile choroidal volume change using video-rate optical coherence tomography, and pulsatile IOP change using dynamic contour tonometry. IOP was measured using Tono-Pen XL before and immediately following the injection and was correlated with OR.

RESULTS

The average increase in IOP following IVI was 19±9 mm Hg, with a range of 7-33 mm Hg. The Spearman correlation coefficient between OR and IOP elevation following IVI was 0.796 (p<0.001), showing higher IOP elevation in more rigid eyes. A regression line was also calculated to predict the IOP spike based on the OR coefficient, such that IOP spike=664.17 mm Hg·µL×OR + 4.59 mm Hg.

CONCLUSION

This study shows a strong positive correlation between OR and acute IOP elevation following IVI. These findings indicate that the non-invasive measurement of OR could be an effective tool in identifying patients at risk of IOP spikes following IVI.

Sustained Intraocular Pressure Rise after the Treat and Extend Regimen at 3 Years: Aflibercept versus Ranibizumab

Purpose

To determine the risk factors associated with sustained intraocular pressure (IOP) rise in patients enrolled in the treat and extend (T&E) protocol receiving aflibercept/ranibizumab therapy for 3 years.

Design

Retrospective, observational chart review. Setting. Multicentric. Patients. 789 patients (1021 eyes; 602 males) enrolled in T&E using aflibercept/ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema (DME), wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD), or macular edema in retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Intervention. The history, examination (clinical and special investigations), and treatment records were thoroughly scrutinized. Sustained IOP rise was defined as a rise in IOP above baseline by ≥6 mmHg and/or >24 mmHg on 2 or more consecutive visits. The Wilk-Shapiro test was used for confirming normality of data. The Mantel-Haenszel test and generalized estimating equations were used to analyse multicentric data as well as to analyse data from both eyes of the same patients in the event that both eyes were under therapy. The relative risk, chi-square test (with and without Yates' correction), and univariate and multivariate analysis were used wherever appropriate. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. The primary outcome measure was the determination of risk factors for sustained IOP rise with ranibizumab/aflibercept therapy. Secondary outcome measures included determining the incidence of IOP rise (short term and sustained), visual field, and retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) changes.

Results

The mean follow-up was 42.4 months. Male gender, South Asian ethnicity, older age, presence of AMD and vein occlusion, use of ranibizumab, higher number of injections, narrow angles, switch to bevacizumab/ranibizumab, and preexisting glaucoma were associated with sustained IOP rise. No significant visual field and RNFL changes were seen. The overall incidence was 8.91%. No patient required filtering surgery. No patient with IOP rise returned to baseline.

Conclusion

IOP rise is an important consideration as the chronicity of the condition can eventually lead to glaucomatous changes in eyes with already compromised vision. Follow-ups and use of appropriate therapy can be determined correspondingly.

Sustained Intraocular Pressure Rise after the Treat and Extend Regimen at 3 Years: Aflibercept versus Ranibizumab

Purpose

To determine the risk factors associated with sustained intraocular pressure (IOP) rise in patients enrolled in the treat and extend (T&E) protocol receiving aflibercept/ranibizumab therapy for 3 years.

Design

Retrospective, observational chart review. Setting. Multicentric. Patients. 789 patients (1021 eyes; 602 males) enrolled in T&E using aflibercept/ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema (DME), wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD), or macular edema in retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Intervention. The history, examination (clinical and special investigations), and treatment records were thoroughly scrutinized. Sustained IOP rise was defined as a rise in IOP above baseline by ≥6 mmHg and/or >24 mmHg on 2 or more consecutive visits. The Wilk–Shapiro test was used for confirming normality of data. The Mantel–Haenszel test and generalized estimating equations were used to analyse multicentric data as well as to analyse data from both eyes of the same patients in the event that both eyes were under therapy. The relative risk, chi-square test (with and without Yates' correction), and univariate and multivariate analysis were used wherever appropriate. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. The primary outcome measure was the determination of risk factors for sustained IOP rise with ranibizumab/aflibercept therapy. Secondary outcome measures included determining the incidence of IOP rise (short term and sustained), visual field, and retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) changes.

Results

The mean follow-up was 42.4 months. Male gender, South Asian ethnicity, older age, presence of AMD and vein occlusion, use of ranibizumab, higher number of injections, narrow angles, switch to bevacizumab/ranibizumab, and preexisting glaucoma were associated with sustained IOP rise. No significant visual field and RNFL changes were seen. The overall incidence was 8.91%. No patient required filtering surgery. No patient with IOP rise returned to baseline.

Conclusion

IOP rise is an important consideration as the chronicity of the condition can eventually lead to glaucomatous changes in eyes with already compromised vision. Follow-ups and use of appropriate therapy can be determined correspondingly.

Major factors affecting intraocular pressure spike after intravitreal ranibizumab injection: Vitreous reflux and its amount

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of vitreous reflux and its amount on short-term intraocular pressure after intravitreal injection of ranibizumab.

METHODS

The study included 316 eyes of 276 patients. Intraocular pressures were measured before intravitreal injection (preIOP), immediately after intravitreal injection (postIOP0), and 30 min after intravitreal injection (postIOP30). The amount of vitreous reflux was evaluated by measuring conjunctival bleb diameter, and patients were grouped as; group 1: no vitreous reflux, group 2: less vitreous reflux, and group 3: more vitreous reflux. The data were analyzed using variance analysis, chi-square test, and regression analysis.

RESULTS

PostIOP0 values were highest in group 1, followed by group 2 and group 3 (all p values < 0.001). PostIOP30 values were similar in group 1 and group 2 (p = 0.261), but were lower in group 3 than other two groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.001, respectively). Vitreous reflux was identified as the only factor affecting postinjection intraocular pressure changes (p < 0.001), and a negative correlation was found between the total number of intravitreal injection and vitreous reflux (p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

The major factor affecting short-term postinjection intraocular pressure elevation was vitreous reflux, and intraocular pressure levels increased as the amount of vitreous reflux decreased. Vitreous reflux and its amount decreased as the total number of intravitreal injection increased.

Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab: The Impact of Needle Size in Intraocular Pressure and Pain

Aim

To compare the effect of 30-gauge vs 27-gauge needle size on intraocular pressure (IOP) rise and patients’ pain experience after intravitreal injection (IVI) of bevacizumab.

Materials and methods

Cross-sectional, randomized, double-armed study. Patients were randomized to IVI with 30-gauge or 27-gauge needle. The IOP was measured pre and post IVI. Patients’ pain was graded using the visual analog scale (VAS).

Results

A total of 54 eyes were included. The IVI caused a significant IOP rise in both groups (p < 0.001). In the 30-gauge group, the mean pre- and postinjection IOP was 16.3 ± 3.6 mm Hg and 24.1 ± 9.0 mm Hg. The corresponding figures in the 27-gauge group were 18.0 ± 2.54 (p = 0.26) and 23.1 ± 7.5 mm Hg (p = 0.66). In the 30-gauge group, the mean VAS pain score was 3.2 ± 2.6 compared to 3.0 ± 2.5 in the 27-gauge group (p = 0.78).

Conclusion

The IVI caused a significant rise in IOP after the injection, independently of the needle size used. The 27-gauge needle coursed with lower postinjection IOP without prejudice of the patient comfort.

Clinical significance

The IVI with 27-gauge may be considered for glaucomatous eyes (higher risk eyes), for which IOP spikes are not recommended.

How to cite this article

Loureiro M, Matos R, Sepulveda P, Meira D. Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab: The Impact of Needle Size in Intraocular Pressure and Pain. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2017;11(2):38-41.