Advancements in the Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors

A convolutional neural network-based system for identifying neuroendocrine neoplasms and multiple types of lesions in the pancreas using EUS (with videos)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

EUS is sensitive in detecting pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (pNEN). However, the endoscopic diagnosis of pNEN is operator-dependent and time-consuming because pNEN mimics normal pancreas and other pancreatic lesions. We intended to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based system, named iEUS, for identifying pNEN and multiple types of pancreatic lesions using EUS.

METHODS

Retrospective data of 12,200 EUS images obtained from pNEN and non-pNEN pancreatic lesions, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), and pancreatic cystic neoplasm (PCN), were used to develop iEUS, which was composed of a 2-category (pNEN or non-pNEN pancreatic lesions) classification model (CNN1) and a 4-category (pNEN, PDAC, AIP, or PCN) classification model (CNN2). Videos from consecutive patients were prospectively collected for a human-iEUS contest to evaluate the performance of iEUS.

RESULTS

Five hundred seventy-three patients were enrolled in this study. In the human-iEUS contest containing 203 videos, CNN1 and CNN2 showed an accuracy of 84.2% and 88.2% for diagnosing pNEN, respectively, which were significantly higher than that of novices (75.4%) and comparable with intermediate endosonographers (85.5%) and experts (85.5%). In addition, CNN2 showed an accuracy of 86.2%, 97.0%, and 97.0% for diagnosing PDAC, AIP, and PCN, respectively. With the assistance of iEUS, the sensitivity of endosonographers at all 3 levels in diagnosing pNEN has significantly improved (64.6% vs 44.8%, 87.5% vs 71.9%, and 74.0% vs 57.6%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The iEUS precisely diagnosed pNEN and other confusing pancreatic lesions and thus can assist endosonographers in achieving more accessible and accurate endoscopic diagnoses with EUS. (Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2100049697.).

Novel biopsy method using an endoscopic tapered sheath for cystic gastric subepithelial lesions

Watch a video of this article.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided bite-on-bite biopsy and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of gastric tumors with negative malignant endoscopy biopsies: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Specific types of gastric tumors, including gastric linitis plastica and lymphoma, may cause extensive deep-layer infiltration, impeding an accurate diagnosis with endoscopic biopsy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided bite-on-bite biopsy and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in diagnosing gastric malignancies with negative endoscopic biopsies.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed suspicious malignant gastric lesion cases in our hospital from October 2017 to August 2023. Clinical manifestations, radiographical examinations, endoscopic examinations, histopathological results, and therapeutic strategies were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty malignant gastric tumor cases with negative endoscopic biopsies were incorporated into our study. EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy was performed in 16 cases exclusively, whereas 17 patients received EUS-FNA exclusively, and seven patients underwent both simultaneously. Among the 23 patients who received the EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy, 22 (95.7%) were diagnosed with malignancies. Among the 24 patients who received EUS-FNA, a total of 19 cases with malignancies (79.2%) were confirmed by EUS-FNA (p = 0.11): 13 gastric adenocarcinomas, five metastatic malignancies, and one malignant stromal tumor. No adverse events were observed in any of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy and EUS-FNA possess their advantages and disadvantages. EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy could serve as a reliable diagnostic method for shallow lesions with negative malignant endoscopic biopsies.

A new endoscopic treatment for gastric fundal subepithelial lesions using loop-assisted inversion and double suture technique

The loop-assisted inversion and double suture technique has been used as an endoscopic treatment for gastric fundal subepithelial lesions. This study aimed to analyse the efficacy and safety of the loop-assisted inversion and double suture technique for the treatment of gastric fundal subepithelial lesions. Consecutive patients with gastric fundal tumours who underwent the loop-assisted inversion and double suture technique at our centre between January 2023 and January 2024 were retrospectively assessed. The primary outcome was surgical success. Twelve patients with 14 gastric fundal subepithelial lesions underwent the loop-assisted inversion and double suture technique during the study period. Two patients had double lesions. Pathology confirmed that out of 14 lesions, 12 were gastrointestinal stromal tumors and 2 were leiomyomas.All the gastrointestinal stromal tumors were of low-risk G1. Operative success was achieved in 14 lesions with complete resection, with no intraoperative transfer to surgery; no adverse effects, including postoperative perforation and bleeding; and no postoperative antibiotic use. During the follow-up period, all 14 lesions showed no recurrence. The loop-assisted inversion and double suture technique is a safe, effective, and time-saving endoscopic treatment for gastric fundal subepithelial lesions. However, prospective large-scale multicentre studies are required.

Advancements in Endoscopic Treatment for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors

Peroral flexible endoscopy is a minimally invasive technique that enables the local resection of gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) with malignant potential. Resection techniques are mainly chosen on the basis of the lesion size. Minute SETs less than 1 cm should be managed through a watch and wait strategy, with the exception of histologically diagnosed superficial lesions, which require endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection. For 1- to 3-cm small SETs, endoscopic enucleation techniques, such as endoscopic submucosal excavation, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection, and peroral endoscopic tumor resection, can be used. However, endoscopic full-thickness resection is preferred for histologically complete removal with negative surgical margins. When endoscopic full-thickness resection is considered technically difficult, laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is a safe and dependable alternative. Moderate-sized SETs (3 to 5 cm) require surgical intervention because the lesions must be removed transabdominally. LECS is a less invasive surgical procedure as it reduces the resection area; however, some LECS techniques that require transoral tumor retrieval are not available. Endoscopic intervention for lesions larger than 5 cm should be used with caution for research purposes. With advancements in endoscopic diagnosis, the indications for endoscopic treatment for SETs are expected to improve, thereby enhancing patients' quality of life.

Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering and Its Influence on Healthcare Structure: Current and Future Prospects

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a growing area of computer science that combines technologies with data science to develop intelligent, highly computation-able systems. Its ability to automatically analyze and query huge sets of data has rendered it essential to many fields such as healthcare. This article introduces you to artificial intelligence, how it works, and what its central role in biomedical engineering is. It brings to light new developments in medical science, why it is being applied in biomedicine, key problems in computer vision and AI, medical applications, diagnostics, and live health monitoring. This paper starts with an introduction to artificial intelligence and its major subfields before moving into how AI is revolutionizing healthcare technology. There is a lot of emphasis on how it will transform biomedical engineering through the use of AI-based devices like biosensors. Not only can these machines detect abnormalities in a patient's physiology, but they also allow for chronic health tracking. Further, this review also provides an overview of the trends of AI-enabled healthcare technologies and concludes that the adoption of artificial intelligence in healthcare will be very high. The most promising are in diagnostics, with highly accurate, non-invasive diagnostics such as advanced imaging and vocal biomarker analyzers leading medicine into the future.

Spontaneous Hemoperitoneum Caused by Malignant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Case Report

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are less prevalent mesenchymal tumors, accounting for 1% of gastrointestinal malignancies. Spontaneous hemoperitoneum (SH) following gastric GIST rupture is a rare occurrence. The present study described a case of a 67-year-old female who presented with acute onset abdominal pain. Vital signs at the time of presentation were unstable. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the abdomen revealed a mixed-density mass lesion with multiple hyperdense areas within. A hemogram indicated a low hemoglobin level. An emergency laparotomy revealed a ruptured pedunculated, friable mass with active bleeding arising from the lesser curvature of the stomach. A wedge resection was carried out to achieve a gross negative margin of the mass. Final pathology confirmed GIST epitheloid type with positive margins (pT3N0M0-pathologically tumor size within 10 cm with no nodal or distant metastasis) and positive for CD117, DOG1. Given the tumor rupture and positive margins, the patient was started on imatinib mesylate therapy. As demonstrated in this case, GIST rarely ruptures, resulting in hemoperitoneum. The primary treatment approach is surgical exploration and resection.

Cold snare endoscopic resection for subepithelial tumors of the upper third of the esophagus

Although most esophagus subepithelial tumors are benign, the possibility of malignancy cannot be completely ruled out and it can gradually increase, leading to symptoms such as dysphagia, so removal is still recommended. The narrow cavity and thin walls of the upper esophagus, as well as movement caused by breathing and heartbeat, makes it difficult to perform operation by endoscopy or surgery. Cold snare pulpectomy may been used to remove subepithelial tumors of the upper third of the esophagus due to a low risk of adverse events and short procedure time.

Diagnostic performance of EUS-guided elastography for differential diagnosis of gallbladder polyp

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

It is difficult to differentiate between neoplastic and non-neoplastic gallbladder (GB) polyps before surgery. EUS-guided elastography (EUS-EG) is a noninvasive complementary diagnostic method. The utility of EUS-EG in the differential diagnosis of GB polyps has not been investigated. We investigated the diagnostic performance of EUS-EG for the differential diagnosis of GB polyps.

METHODS

Patients with GB polyps were prospectively enrolled from June 2020 until November 2022. EUS-EG and semiquantitative evaluation of the strain ratio (SR) were performed for differential diagnosis of GB polyps. Fifty-three eligible patients were divided into 2 groups based on the final diagnosis after surgery. Patient demographics, EUS characteristics, and SR values were compared. A receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff SR value that discriminates between neoplastic and non-neoplastic GB polyps.

RESULTS

The median SR value for neoplastic polyps (32.93 [interquartile range {IQR}, 22.37-69.02]) was significantly higher than for non-neoplastic polyps (5.40 [IQR, 2.36-14.44], P < .001). Significant differences were found in SR values between non-neoplastic, benign neoplastic (23.38 [IQR, 13.62-39.04]), and malignant polyps (49.25 [IQR, 27.90-82.00]). The optimal cutoff SR value to differentiate between neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps was 18.4. In multivariable logistic regression, SR value >18.4 (odds ratio, 33.604; 95% confidence interval, 2.588-436.292) was an independent predictor of neoplastic polyps.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-EG and SR values can be used as a supplementary method for evaluating GB polyps. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04416763.).

Gastric granular cell tumor: A case report and literature review

Granular cell tumors (GCTs) are neoplasms of uncertain histopathological etiology and therefore there are no universally accepted treatment strategies. GCTs are characterized by abundant eosinophilic granules. Since they are predominantly located in the skin and subcutaneous tissues, gastric GCTs are exceedingly rare. The present study documents the case of a 52-year-old man who visited the Gastroenterology Clinic of the People's Hospital of Putuo District (Zhoushan, China) due to upper abdominal fullness. Endoscopic ultrasonography revealed a well-defined hypoechoic nodule in the submucosal layer of the stomach body. The lesion was completely excised using endoscopic submucosal dissection and the patient made a full postoperative recovery. Immunohistochemistry showed positivity for S100 and CD68, with CD34 expression surrounding the tumor cells. At telephone follow-up until May 2024, the patient's fullness and discomfort were noted to be relieved. The characteristics of the CD34 expression pattern may serve as a novel basis for the pathological diagnosis of gastric GCTs. Endoscopic resection is a feasible option for gastric GCTs smaller than 2 cm.

Prevalence and natural course of incidental gastric subepithelial tumors

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) are often encountered during the upper gastrointestinal endoscopic screening. We assessed the prevalence of gastric SETs and the risk factors for their progression.

METHODS

We reviewed the electronic medical records of 30,754 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopic screening at our medical center between January 2013 and December 2016.

RESULTS

Among the 30,754 patients examined, 599 (1.94%) had gastric SETs. The prevalence increased with age and was 9.56% in patients aged ≥70 years. In total, 262 patients underwent serial endoscopy for more than 6 months. The median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR], 61-74), and the number of females was 167 (63.7%). During a median follow-up of 58 months (IQR, 38-75), 22 patients (8.4%) showed significant changes in tumor size. An irregular border (odds ratio, 4.623; 95% confidence interval, 1.093-19.558; p=0.037) was a significant risk factor for progression. Seven patients underwent surgical or endoscopic resections. The pathologies of gastric SETs included leiomyomas (n=3), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (n=2), and lipomas (n=2).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of gastric SETs increases with age. Most gastric SETs do not progress during long-term endoscopic examinations, and the risk of an increase in size is low in asymptomatic small SETs without irregular borders.

Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnosis of Gastric Mesenchymal Tumors Using Digital Endosonography Image Analysis

Background/Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) diagnostic tools have shown excellent performance in diagnosing gastric mesenchymal tumors. This study aimed to assess whether incorporating clinical and endoscopic factors into AI-assisted EUS classification models based on digital image analysis could improve the diagnostic performance of AI-assisted EUS diagnostic tools. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 464 patients who underwent both EUS and surgical resection of gastric mesenchymal tumors, including 294 gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), 52 leiomyomas, and 41 schwannomas. AI-assisted classification models for GISTs and non-GIST tumors were developed utilizing clinical and endoscopic factors and digital EUS image analysis. Results: Regarding the baseline EUS classification models, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) values of the logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, K-nearest neighbor (KNN), and support vector machine (SVM) models were 0.805, 0.673, 0.781, 0.740, and 0.791, respectively. Using the new classification models incorporating clinical and endoscopic factors into the baseline classification models, the AUC values of the logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, KNN, and SVM models increased to 0.853, 0.715, 0.896, 0.825, and 0.794, respectively. In particular, the random forest and KNN models exhibited significant improvement in performance in Delong's test (both p < 0.001). Conclusion: The diagnostic performance of the AI-assisted EUS classification models improved when clinical and endoscopic factors were incorporated. Our results provided direction for developing new AI-assisted EUS models for gastric mesenchymal tumors.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy using a three-prong asymmetry tip needle for pancreatic tumors and peridigestive tract lesions: Retrospective single-center study

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition is vital for diagnosing pancreatic and peridigestive tract lesions. A new three-prong asymmetry tip needle has been developed for this procedure. In this study, we retrospectively assessed the diagnostic ability, tissue collection volume, and procedural adverse events of the three-prong asymmetry tip needle for solid pancreatic, subepithelial, and other organ lesions.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 58 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition using a three-prong asymmetry tip needle between August 2022 and April 2023 at a single care center.

RESULTS

The tissue collection rate was 91.4% with 89.7% accuracy, 89.3% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, and 25% negative predictive value. No significant differences in collection rates or diagnostic performance were observed based on the target organ, puncture route, or lesion size. Using our original assessment method, the average histological core tissue score was 3.1 ± 0.8, whereas the blood contamination volume was 2.5 ± 0.8. Only one of 58 patients (1.7%) developed a pancreatic fistula of moderate severity as an adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

The three-prong asymmetry tip needle demonstrated good diagnostic capability and adequate sample volume with safety for pancreatic, subepithelial, and other organ lesions.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is the first-choice procedure for obtaining pathological tissue samples from gastrointestinal (GI) subepithelial lesions (SELs). However, its diagnostic accuracy is lower than that for pancreatic masses owing to puncture difficulty and the need for immunostaining for definitive diagnosis. The advent of fine-needle biopsy needles, which have become well known in recent years, improves the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA for GI SELs. The forward-viewing echoendoscope and rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) have also helped to improve diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, in facilities where ROSE is not available, endosonographers perform a macroscopic on-site evaluation. With these procedural innovations, EUS-FNA is now performed aggressively even for SELs smaller than 20 mm. The incidence of procedure-related adverse events such as bleeding and infection is low, and thus, EUS-FNA can be safely performed to diagnose SELs.

Second-look upper endoscopy as the initial approach to subepithelial lesions: a reassuring and reliable strategy

BACKGROUND

Although endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) plays a critical role in the management of subepithelial lesions (SEL) of upper gastrointestinal tract many can be classified solely by a thorough upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) which can reduce the burden of additional studies.

AIMS

Analyze the impact of a stepwise approach starting with a second-look UGE before the decision of EUS in patients referred to our center with suspected SEL.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study which included all adult patients referred to our center between 2015 and 2020 with suspected SEL.Second-look UGE evaluated the location, size, color, surface characteristics, movability and consistency of the SEL and bite-on-bite biopsies were performed. Decisions on SEL management and follow-up were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 193 SEL (190 patients) were included. At the index-UGE, stomach was the most frequent location (n = 115;59.6%). Most patients performed a second-look UGE (n = 180; 94.7%). A minority was oriented directly to EUS (n = 8;4.2%) or endoscopic resection (n = 2; 1.1%). In patients who underwent a second-look UGE, SEL were excluded in 25 (13.9%) and 21 (11.7%) did not need further work-up. The remaining patients were submitted to EUS (n = 88;48.9%), surveillance by UGE (n = 44; 24.4%) or endoscopic resection (n = 2; 1.1%).

CONCLUSION

Systematically performing a second-look UGE, in patients referred with suspected SEL, safely preclude the need for subsequent investigation in approximately one-fourth of the patients. As UGE is less invasive and more readily available, we suggest that a second-look UGE should be the initial approach in SEL management.

Comparison of 19G FNA Versus 22G FNB Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Sampling of Subepithelial Tumors: Is Bigger Better?

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic efficiency of 19G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and 22G fine-needle biopsy (FNB) in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling for subepithelial tumors (SETs).

METHODS

The data of patients with SETs who underwent 19G FNA or 22G FNB were reviewed retrospectively in two tertiary hospitals. Tissue cores were assessed by macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE). Cytological or histological diagnosis were classified as definite, suspect, or no diagnosis.

RESULTS

Seventy five patients (mean age: 55 years, 44 males) underwent 19G EUS-FNA (31) or 22G EUS-FNB (44). The overall diagnostic yield was 82.7%. The rate of definite cytological diagnoses was 9.7% (3/31) in 19G and 13.6% (6/44) in 22G group (x2  = 1.520, P = .468). In terms of MOSE, 19G needle, requiring only two punctures, achieved a higher good tissue core rate than 22G group (100.0% [31/31] versus 84.1% [37/44], x2  = 5.440, P = .020]). For histological diagnosis, the 19G group achieved higher definite rate than the 22G group, 93.6% (29/31) versus 65.9% (29/44) (x2  = 7.957, P = .019) on the first puncture, 90.3% (28/31) versus 63.6% (28/44) (x2  = 7.139, P = .028) on the second puncture, 96.8% (30/31) versus 70.5% (31/44) (x2  = 7.319, P = .026) on both the first and second punctures, and 96.8% (30/31) versus 72.7% (32/44) (x2  = 7.538, P = .023) on all three punctures.

CONCLUSIONS

The 19G EUS-FNA requires only two punctures to achieve better tissue core quality by MOSE and yields a higher rate of histological diagnosis than 22G ProCore needle for SETs. The bigger 19G FNA needle seems to play an important role in the evaluation of SETs.

Methods to increase the diagnostic efficiency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: An updated review

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a means to procure adequate specimens for histological and cytologic analysis. The ideal EUS-FNA should be safe, accurate, and have a high sample adequacy rate and low adverse events rate. In recent years, many guidelines and trials on EUS-FNA have been published. The purpose of this article is to provide an update on the influence of some of the main factors on the diagnostic efficiency of EUS-FNA as well as a rare but serious complication known as needle tract seeding.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition beyond the pancreas

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) offers the ability to obtain tissue material via a fine needle under direct visualization for cytological or pathological examination. Prior studies have looked at EUS tissue acquisition; however, most reports have been centered around lesions of the pancreas. This paper aims to review the literature on EUS tissue acquisition in other organs (beyond the pancreas) such as the liver, biliary tree, lymph nodes, and upper and lower gastrointestinal tracts. Furthermore, techniques for obtaining tissue samples under EUS guidance continue to evolve. Specifically, some of the techniques that endoscopists employ are suction techniques (i.e., dry heparin, dry suction technique, wet suction technique), the slow pull technique, and the fanning technique. Apart from acquisition techniques, the type and size of the needle utilized play a major role in the quality of samples. This review describes the indications for tissue acquisition for each organ, and also describes and compares the various tissue acquisition techniques, as well as the different needles used according to their shape and size.

Endoscopic Ultrasound Advanced Techniques for Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) are subepithelial lesions (SELs) that commonly develop in the gastrointestinal tract. GISTs, unlike other SELs, can exhibit malignant behavior, so differential diagnosis is critical to the decision-making process. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is considered the most accurate imaging method for diagnosing and differentiating SELs in the gastrointestinal tract by assessing the lesions precisely and evaluating their malignant risk. Due to their overlapping imaging characteristics, endosonographers may have difficulty distinguishing GISTs from other SELs using conventional EUS alone, and the collection of tissue samples from these lesions may be technically challenging. Even though it appears to be less effective in the case of smaller lesions, histology is now the gold standard for achieving a final diagnosis and avoiding unnecessary and invasive treatment for benign SELs. The use of enhanced EUS modalities and elastography has improved the diagnostic ability of EUS. Furthermore, recent advancements in artificial intelligence systems that use EUS images have allowed them to distinguish GISTs from other SELs, thereby improving their diagnostic accuracy.

Natural Course of Asymptomatic Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesion of 2 cm or Less in Size

There is limited evidence of a natural course of an upper gastrointestinal (UGI)-subepithelial lesion (SEL) of 2 cm or less in size. This study aims to determine the natural course of UGI-SELs and find the risk factors of the endoscopic and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) findings associated with an increase in size. The medical records of 2539 patients with UGI-SELs between 2004 and 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 672 SELs of 2 cm or less in size were analyzed through EUS and followed up for at least 36 months. The mean follow-up duration was 68 months (range: 36-190 months), and 97 SELs (14.4%) showed an increase in size with a mean increase rate of 1.2 mm/year. Initial size (aOR 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.06), an endoscopic finding of a hemorrhagic spot (aOR 3.13, 95% CI 1.14-8.60), and an EUS finding of a lesion in the fourth layer (aOR 1.87, 95% CI (1.21-2.88) were related to an increase in size. An endoscopic finding of translucidity (aOR 0.28, 95% CI (0.10-0.76) and an EUS finding of calcification (aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.09-0.95) were inversely related to an increase in size. There was no death related to UGI-SELs during the follow-up. While most UGI-SELs of 2 cm or less in size showed no significant size change and favorable prognosis, an individualized follow-up strategy needs to be considered in case of the presence of hemorrhagic spots and lesions in the fourth layer.

A case of early gastric cancer resembling a subepithelial lesion diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration

We present a case of early gastric cancer resembling a subepithelial lesion (GCSEL) derived from the submucosal ectopic gastric glands (SEGGs), diagnosed using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). A 55-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for the investigation of a subepithelial lesion (SEL). Contrast computed tomography and esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed two SELs in the greater curvature of the fundus and the posterior wall of the upper body of the stomach. EUS revealed a hypoechoic lesion in the submucosa and suggested partial invasion into the muscularis propria of the greater curvature of the fundus, and an anechoic lesion in the submucosa of the posterior wall of the upper body. The different diagnosis for the SEL in the fundus was GCSEL, neuroendocrine tumor, malignant lymphoma, and gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type. EUS-FNA findings suggested adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent a laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy. Pathological findings confirmed a differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma derived from the SEGG, which partially invaded into the submucosa of the surrounding gastric wall without lymphovascular invasion or lymph node metastasis. The patient has been recurrence-free after 10 months of follow-up. EUS should be performed for SELs followed by EUS-FNA for lesions, such as GCSEL, that require early intervention.